DavidEd wrote:

Takk så mye!

alienflybot wrote:

[ General]

• 
  Tags

1. Remove: OP (Included in the start of the keyword 'opening') will do at last update
   
   Difficulty Spread
2. Increase the AR and OD of Overdose to 9.3? It is done so that the AR is different between Rain and Overdose, and can show a gradient of AR/OD values from Salad to Crystal's Acceleration. didnt even notice ;_; changed
   
   Folder
3. There is a black image 'Untitled-1' in the song folder. Is it redundant? If yes then please remove it from the folder. the reason it is there is so that i can playtest the map more accurately in the editor. will not include in the updates from now on though

[ Overdose]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:00:170 - 00:04:961 - A bit strange as the intro. Firstly, maybe it is better if you can use other patterns instead of reversed sliders, it can provide more movements. Secondly, it appeared to be bizarre as only the first stanza with a movement like 00:00:170 (1,2,3) - but the next two are basically the same placements, which starts at left and jump to the right. Probably you can change the patterns in the intro to make it more interesting. i changed the angle of all sliders for more movement but ill keep the arrangement cause the melody is the same for the 2 last stanzas so it follows the music imo
   
   
2. 00:12:461 (1,2,3) - Actually I think the curve started a bit earlier. It should start at 00:12:670 - instead so you may want to change the pattern here. Try this kind of timeline: *Screenshot and add a HDash between the new slider and the stream. the stream didnt fit and didnt follow the music that great anyways so remapped
   
   
3. 00:21:315 (6,7,8) - The distance of (7,8) is a bit wide. I would say it is better if you can move (8) closer to (7) as players will have to do a sharp turn at (7) which is making the difficulty hard. fixed
   
   
4. 01:16:836 (1,2,3) - ^ and this one is even harder. I have missed quite a few times during the testplaying. fixed

[ Rain]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:00:170 - 00:04:961 - There are few things I would like to mention here. First of all, the movements of each stanza here are quite plain, like it is just moving left and right repetitively. What about changing the movement like moving 00:01:420 (2) - to the opposite side with the same distance kept between 00:01:420 (2,3) - ? Or you can use other patterns to replace this kind of reversed slider. Secondly, the patterns has been used throughout the intro, which can be pretty boring to players. I think you can change a bit for the 3rd one, i.e. 00:03:503 (1,2,3) - . Maybe you can use other patterns instead of reversed sliders? did something simular to overdose. but this part is pretty consistent and clean so its fine
   
   
2. 00:19:752 (6,7,8,1) - Wouldn't it be better if you add HDash at (8,1) here instead? It matches the audio here as (1) would be the main beat for emphasis. fix
   
   
3. 00:24:753 (5,6,7,1) - ^, I think HDash at (7,1) matches the rhythm more. fix
   
   
4. 00:38:503 (1,2,3) - This is too hard in my opinion. Basically it is because players are not alert for the HDash at (2,3), it is also strange because HDash is put to emphasize the note starting at blue tick. In addition, (2) also doesn't favor the HDashes as it is completely vertical, which is too hard to control after the HDashes. I would suggest removing the HDash of 00:38:503 (1,2) - , only keep the one at (2,3). i agree, it seems out of place
   
   New Combos
5. 01:24:753 (7) - NC? would be weird for people using combo colors

[ Platter]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:07:253 (2,3,4) - Since the distance of (2,3) is quite far and (3,4) also require a bit of a walk, players often need the momentum given by the dash at (2,3) in order to reach (4). I would suggest moving (4) closer to (3) so players can still continue if they missed the dash. fix
   
   
2. 00:08:920 (2,3,4) - ^ going to keep cause of intensity, but i reduced spacing overall so its justified
   
   
3. 00:11:732 (7,1) - The dash here is quite difficult to hit due to the following reasons. Firstly, the gap is quite big, 1/4 dashing is still too difficult for a Platter. Would be better if you just keep it as a little stream, or you reduce the distance to just a mild dash. Secondly, the shape of the stream 00:11:420 (4,5,6,7) - doesn't favor the jump there, as players cannot get enough force to dash towards (1). What I mean is, if the stream is like this: *Screenshot, players will press their dash key earlier and it will become easier for them. If you decide to change like this, maybe you can curve the stream more and rotate the stream to form different shape. made it so that you dont require dashing between 3 and 4
   
   
4. 00:12:670 (2) - Pretty minor, it feels strange to have this kind of slider, as it doesn't look aesthetic during gameplay. Would be better if you just keep it as a curve or other kind of sliders. fix
   
   
5. 00:12:670 (2,1) - As the HDash is quite strong with such a large distance, I think (1) should be changed so the movement can be easier, such as: *Screenshot, so players will not overshoot easily and miss because of such heavy HDash. fix
   
   
6. 00:49:336 (2) - How about just ending this slider at red tick for a better rhythm? fix
   
   
7. 01:27:670 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Just a little suggestion. Would it be better if you Ctrl+G (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) and keep a dash between (8,1)? I think it is easier for a Platter and players can dash to catch (1) without missing (8) because of being hurry or not aware. Like this: *Screenshot. Also it looks nice in gameplay and have a better flow. made the ending dashable

[ Salad]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:00:170 - 00:04:753 - Though being an intro, I expected a bit dashes in this part but it is actually FC'able without dashing. Maybe add them at 00:01:628 (3,1) - and 00:03:294 (3,1) - ? In addition, I suggest changing one of them to another pattern because they are just repeating by flipping horizontally. What about changing 00:03:503 (1,2) - to another pattern? fix
   
   
2. 00:08:295 (3,1) - I am not sure whether you are putting a dash here or not, in my opinion I think this is better without dash as it is not strong enough like 00:10:170 (1) - to be emphasized. Yet the distance here is quite big and I think beginners may have trouble for catching 00:07:670 (2,3,1) - this part because of making a sharp turn at (3). What about reducing the distance here so that it can be more lenient? fix
   
   
3. 00:10:170 (1,2) - Again. I think the distance here is a bit large but I don't see (2) a good point to be emphasized. Would've cut down the distance slightly so it can be reached without dashing. Also this can provide a better rhythm sense as players will focus on dashing at 00:11:628 (3,1) - . fix
   
   
4. 00:12:670 (2,1) - The distance here is way too big, even with dash I can only catch the fruit at the tip, which can be difficult for the inexperienced. I suggest reducing the distance here. fix
   
   
5. 00:24:128 (2,3) - Still FC'able without dashing here. Maybe you want to add a dash between them, or keeping the same distance as 00:23:503 (1,2) - ? I think it is better to keep it easy and not putting a dash, as there are quite some dashes going on in the previous part. I suggest moving 00:24:128 (2) - to the middle. keeping the dash for consistency
   
   
6. 00:27:253 (1,2,3) - The timeline is a bit confusing, which can be challenging to be read by the beginners. Maybe use simpler patterns? I think it is great to keep Salad easy, especially when this is the easiest difficulty in the mapset, expect that the beginners will play it. remapped
   
   
7. 00:28:920 (2,3,4) - ^ changed with the remap
   
   
8. 00:46:628 (4,1) - The distance here is too wide, with the same issue as 00:12:670 (2,1) - . Please reduce the distance. fix
   
   
9. 00:49:961 (4,1) - ^, should make the gap smaller so it gives more time for beginners to think. fix
   
   
10. 00:50:170 (1,2,1) - This kind of movement have been used before in 00:43:503 (1,2,1) - and 00:46:836 (1,2,1) - so I think it is better if you can make good use of creativity and use another pattern here? In addition remove the dash at 00:51:003 (2,1) - as it will become inconsistent with the previous parts where no dashes can be found in 00:44:336 (2,1) - and 00:47:670 (2,1) - . You can add dash at 00:51:836 (1,2) - instead. changed it up slightly
    
    
11. 01:21:836 (1,2,3,4,1) - Distances at (2,3) and (4,1) are a bit wide, which can be difficult to inexperienced players. Would be better if you can reduce them by moving 01:22:670 (3,4) - closer to the right. fix
    
    
12. 01:25:170 (1,2,3,4) - ^, and additionally perhaps you can use another pattern here? Since it is better if you are not repeating the same pattern for the same rhythm. I would suggest using another pattern so various movements can be shown. ive been mapping vocals throughout the entire map, so i think that a different pattern will be inconsistent i can consider maybe doing something with aestetics or something, but its fine for now
    
    
13. 01:27:253 (2,3) - I think it doesn't look well in gameplay. Firstly, the flow here is not so good, as (3) curves towards (2), which is quite strange for the movement, I think curving towards the opposite would be better in flow. Secondly, I suggest adding a dash in between as a good finisher. Maybe you can try this: *Screenshot. The curve slider is Ctrl+H'ed and Ctrl+G'ed, then placed at x:120. fix

Despite being a new osu!catch mapper, the mapset is nice in my opinion. Keep it up! thank you

Good luck!

LiousPL wrote:

M4M~ (sry for late)

• 
  General

1. The lowest difficulty must be below 2.0 stars~ From Ranking Criteria thats up to bn to decide (here). ill map a cup if needed
   
   
   Salad
   
   
2. 00:29:232 (2,3) - Maybe change this pattern, becouse you use the same combination few notes later - 00:27:565 (2,3) - And this might to be little boring cant find a better pattern to use here. and im happy with the current ones anyways. nothing wrong with a bit of consistency when the part is only 5 seconds long
   
   
   Platter
   
   
3. 00:22:670 (3,4) - Add here some movement, for increase a hard of flow before Hdash fix
   
   
4. 00:24:336 (2,3) - This too close to note before, add here a movement (the same reason ^^^) fix
   
   
5. 00:43:503 (1,2,1) - I feel here a little boring, maybe do here some addtional move? - Click! -(And it is a great move for add movement into NC too) only changed direction of the heavier vocal beats
   
   
6. 00:46:628 (5,1) - This anti-flow Hdash is not very good idea for this moment, change the position of 5, and change the shape of triplet before for add segment which introduces into flow
   not necessary. this splits the 2 vocal segments into 2
   
7. 00:47:670 (2,1) - Same operation from the previous point (about boring part and NC) fix
   
   
   Rain
   
   
8. 00:24:545 (4,5) - Add here some DS between this objects, you can hear some voice scratch and I think this might to be good idea fix
   
   
9. 01:14:753 (6,1) - Change a shape of 6 to add some anti-flow, like Ctrl+H, anti-flow was looking great here, becouse there is a hdash to a start next vocal line in kiai~ fix
   
   
   Overdose
   
   
10. 00:13:190 (7) - Make here erect slider (start of slider x:116, end x:35), this create some harder anti-flow hdash to break from a stream part to a vocal part~ fix
    
    
11. 00:17:878 (7,8) - Good sound for create a Hdash fix

1. 00:00:170 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - Having the same intro that any other diff, rhythmically and pattern-wise save some hyperdashes and slightly smaller SV, is really boring. Furthermore, exposing players to 1/2 dashes less than 2 secs into the song on a diff that's supposed to introduce dashes is a bit too much. The least I would do is removing 00:01:628 (3,3) - and have 1/1 dashes instead, which are way more lenient and adequate to introduce a dash.
2. 00:09:336 (3,4) - I think you can turn this into a 1/1 slider instead (like you did on 00:07:670 (2) - ). Though I understand you want to highlight the higher-pitched synth, I think you should go for a bit more simplicity considering it's the easier diff in the set and the 1/4 looks a bit cramped due to the low AR.
3. 00:09:961 (5,1) - I think you can make this dash a little bit clearer and less cramped on the horizontal by increasing the distance; something like x:224 or x:228 for (1) should work.
4. 00:12:670 (2,1) - I'd increase the distance a bit to better emphasize the beginning of the Kiai, as the current one feels bland compared to the previous dashes. Moving 00:13:503 (1) - 's head to x:368 (you will have to adjust the rest of the slider a bit) could do it.
5. 00:20:170 (1,2) - This distance looks a bit ambiguous, I'd reduce the spacing a bit so it's clearer that it's walkable.
6. 00:25:170 (1) - Personally I don't like missing strong beats on spinner's ends. I would make the spinner 1/1 shorter (ending on 00:26:420 - ) and map something on 00:26:836 - instead.
7. 00:27:565 (2) - The instrument the head of this slider is following is really weak, and I didn't even notice it the first time I heard it. I suggest you replace this slider with the following timeline, as it follows instruments that are stronger:
   
8. 00:28:086 (4,1) - Doesn't feel that strong to me to deserve a dash. Maybe you can take the dash out?
9. 00:29:232 (2) - Same stuff as mentioned on 00:27:565 (2) -
10. 00:30:170 (1,2) - This is more of a personal thing, but I think you're losing emphasis on the vocal at 00:30:795 - by having it as a slider end. You could replace it with the following timeline, which is slightly simpler (considering it's the easiest diff in the set) and it's clearly focusing on the vocals. Note this would also apply for other parts such as 00:33:503 (1,2) - and 00:36:836 (1,2) - , should you apply it.
    
11. 00:31:628 (3,1) - I would take the dash out of here. Your diff is (for the most part) using a dash every 4/1, which not only makes it really repetitive in dashing, but also makes the Kiai and your own hitsounding some emphasis. If you took this dash out, the dashes for the finish hitsounds at 00:30:170 (1) - and 00:33:295 (3,1) - would become much more important.
12. 00:34:961 (3,1) - ^Similar stuff
13. 00:41:628 (3,1) - ^Similar stuff
14. 00:51:003 (3,1) - Personally I wouldn't have a dash here, but if you intend to keep it I'd make it slightly larger to make it a little bit clearer.
15. 01:13:295 (5,1) - This dash is a bit on the large side, I'd reduce it a couple gridspaces, i.e. (1) on x:320 or so.
16. 01:19:128 (2,3,4,1) - This pattern plays a bit weirdly IMO and the dash at the end is a bit large. I think you can tackle both things by moving 01:19:336 (3,4) - to x:96.
17. 01:21:628 (4,1,2,3,4,1) - The dashes here are missing some strength. You can easily give them a little more strength by moving 01:22:670 (3,4) - to x:396.
18. 01:24:961 (4,1,2,3) - ^Similar stuff for these dashes, you could move 01:25:170 (1,2) - to the right a bit.
19. 01:27:253 (2,3) - The dash here doesn't fit, I'd take it out.

1. I noticed there are a lot of hyperdashes into antiflow sliders (e.g. 00:08:295 (5,1) - , 00:09:961 (5,1) - , 00:14:961 (5,1) - , 00:18:295 (5,1) - , 00:21:420 (4,1) - , 00:23:086 (4,1) - , 00:41:419 (5,1) - , 00:51:003 (3,1) - , 00:53:295 (6,1) - and some more). While I don't agree with the rule as a whole, it is currently unrankable so you need to tone them down. One option is to make the sliders vertical at first and then have the movement back, like you did on 00:12:670 (2,1) -. This provides some leniency for players that might not time the landing correctly.
2. 00:07:670 (3,4) - I think you can separate this 2 objects a bit more by moving (4) to the right, it looks a bit cramped right now.
3. 00:11:003 (3,4,5,6,7) - This is incorrectly snapped, these should be snapped to 1/6.
4. 00:15:170 (1,2) - I think that you could increase the distance a bit if you want to better emphasize the dash, it's a bit ambiguous at the moment, for example, x:212. Also, 00:16:315 (3) - is on a really weak sound and it makes the clap on 00:16:420 (4) - lose a bit of emphasis, so I'd remove it.
5. 00:19:336 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, having a 1/4 pattern limits the distance you can use, and that's clearly noticeable when the finish + clap hitsounded circle at 00:19:752 (5) - has no distance emphasis at all. If you deleted 00:19:648 (4) - , you could have a larger distance.
6. Having 00:20:065 (7) - prohibits you from using a HDash to 00:20:170 (1) - , which would be really emphasized if it had one. So I'd take this circle out and add an HDash between (6,7)
7. 00:26:732 (9) - ^Similar stuff here.
8. 00:27:982 (4,5) - A dash to a blue tick is not really intuitive, and this one is heavily on the large side. I'd reduce the distance to make it like 00:29:024 (5,6) -
9. 00:30:586 (2,3) - I think this dash is a bit on the large side for this section. I'd move 00:30:795 (3,4,5) - a bit to the right, around x:76 or so.
10. 00:32:461 (3) - Similar stuff here, maybe you could move it to x:152
11. 00:41:315 (4,5) - Similar stuff to 00:27:982 (4,5) - , I'd reduce the distance a bit.
12. 00:43:398 (7) - Once again, you wasted an opportunity to add an HDash because you can't use 1/4 HDashes on Platters at this BPM. I'd remove this note and add an HDash instead.
13. 00:50:065 (6) - ^Same
14. 00:50:170 (1,2) - 00:51:836 (1) - Be consistent with your rhythm usages. These are mapped to similar sounds yet the emphases are different.
15. 00:58:399 (7) - I would again take this note out and have an HDash instead, to better emphasize the beginning of the Kiai.
16. 01:05:170 (1,2) - This dash is a bit uncomfortable to play because it feels a bit large. I think you can move 01:05:795 (2,3) - to x:364 and then adjust 01:06:420 (4) - a bit.
17. 01:11:732 (7) - Another instance where you waste a chance to add an HDash because you added a 1/4 note.
18. 01:15:170 (1,2) - Another dash that feels a bit too large, I would move 01:15:795 (2,3,4,5) - slightly to the left.
19. 01:23:295 (6,7,1) - ^Once again.
20. 01:23:503 (1,2) - The 1/4 dash here feels a bit uncomfortable, I'd take the circle on the blue tick out.
21. 01:25:795 (2,3,4) - Another wasted chance to have a bit more emphasis through a dash.
22. 01:28:398 (8,1) - 1/4 HDashes are unrankable at this BPM.

1. 00:06:836 (1,2) - To be honest I don't get why you added 1/4 HDashes between these, when you didn't even use 1/2 HDashes for similar sounds like 00:08:086 (4) - . If the sole reason is adding some difficulty, it should be removed.
2. 00:08:503 (1,2) - ^Same
3. 00:09:753 (5,6) - Spacing between these is too small comparing to the previous 1/4 spacings, so it looks and plays a bit awkward. I'd move (6) a bit to the right if possible.
4. 00:13:085 (7,8,9,10) - The distance increase makes this a bit awkward to play, since it's a tight walk. I'd reduce the spacing between these circles.
5. 00:19:648 (5,6) - It is weird that you decided to add an HDash here, when on a previous pattern with the same sounds you didn't (00:16:315 (5,6) - ). I'd remove the HDash.
6. 00:20:065 (8,1) - Here would be a nice place to have an HDash instead, because of the strong vocal on the downbeat.
7. 00:24:961 (6,7,1,2) - A few weird things here. First, (1) is stronger than (7), so it would make sense that the HDash went between (7,1) rather than (6,7). Also, the current timeline for (1,2) provides emphasis on a beat that's not as strong as those around it (red tick vs white ticks). I think you can tackle both issues with the following pattern:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:31:211 (7,8) - Considering this is a sort of unexpected antiflow movement, I'd put (8) a bit closer to the previous object.
9. 00:32:253 (2,3,4,5) - To me the HDash should be between (4,5) rather than (2,3), (5) is stronger to me.
10. 00:32:670 (5,6) - I fail to get what's 1/6 here. If there's something 1/6, I think it's overshadowed by the sounds at the 1/4.
11. 00:33:086 (7,1) - I'd try to have a HDash here, the note at (1) clearly deserves it.
12. 00:38:920 (2,3) - Feels a bit harsh, not only because of the unexpected HDash to the blue tick, but because of the strong antiflow after it. I'd curve (3) a bit more so it follows the movement from the HDash, at least for the first part.
13. 00:50:170 (1,2,3,4) - Having these 1/4 HDashes feels like adding difficulty just for the sake of adding difficulty, as you didn't for similar sounds (e.g. 00:51:836 (1) - ). I'd take them out.

1. 00:10:170 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - I think you can reduce the overall distance here, reducing the strength of the HDashes. It feels a little overdone right now. Also, 00:11:003 (1,2) - should be 1/6 instead.
2. 00:12:878 (5,6) - Kinda harsh spacing after the HDash, I'd move 00:13:086 (6,7) - a bit to the right to add some leniency.
3. 00:14:232 (6,7,8) - To me (8) is stronger than (7), so it's weird that (7) has a 1/4 HDash to it an (8) has a walk to it. If anything, I'd do it the other way around.
4. 00:17:565 (6,7,8,9,1) - Having these (4) HDashes in a row is overdoing it, and it's a heavy difficulty spike compared to the previous pattern mapped to these same sounds.
5. 00:18:503 (1,2,3,4) - Too much hyperdashes in a row. I'd move 00:19:128 (3,4,5) - to the left, and have 00:18:920 (2,3) - at dashing distance, and then adjust 00:19:961 (6,7) - .
6. 00:26:628 (9,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Lots of antiflow movement after 1/4 HDashes. For 00:26:836 (1) - , I'd curve the slider a bit more so it follows the movement from the 1/4 HDash. I'd also delete 00:27:149 (2,5) - to follow the melody closer.
7. 00:29:753 (3) - Similar stuff here, I'd curve the slider a bit more, as it's a bit harsh after the 1/4 HDash.
8. 00:32:670 (4,5) - Similar comment to the Rain, I don't know what are these 1/6s following, so I'd put 1/4s instead.
9. 00:36:003 (4) - ^Same stuff here, should be 1/4 instead. Also, the heavy antiflow at 00:36:211 (5,6) - after the HDash can be a bit harsh, so maybe you could put (6) to the left of (5).
10. 00:40:170 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Rhythms and HDashes aren't really defined to me here. I suggest the following timeline, which is a lot simpler but way clearer in what it's following. For 00:41:836 (1,2,3) - , just repeat (1,2,3,4) from the proposed timeline.
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 00:50:170 (1,2) - If you're not going to HDash this, I'd prefer it to be a walkable distance instead, so I'd move it closer to the slider. Also applies on 00:51:003 (4,5) - and 00:51:836 (1,2) -
12. 00:52:670 (4,5) - While the 1/6 do fit here, I think the HDashes are a bit overdone, so I'd move (5) to the right to reduce the distance a bit.
13. 01:04:336 (3,4,5,6,1) - Having all these HDashes in a row, with one of different snap in between is a bit harsh. Maybe I'd change the direction and position of (6), like this (I then noticed it's similar to what you did on 01:17:670 (4,5,6,7) - ):
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:07:982 (4,5,6,1) - Similar stuff as before. I'd try to rearrange stuff so that you don't have the HDash between (5,6), as (6) is the weakest sound here.
15. 01:08:815 (2,3,4) - Similar stuff here, I think (3,4) should be a normal dash instead.
16. 01:26:315 (4) - I think the sounds at the blue ticks aren't that strong compared to the vocal at the white tick, so I'd delete the slider and place a circle on 01:26:420 - instead.

CLSW wrote:

BG changed :thinking:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

General
Looks good to me, but it should be argued the set needs a Cup just because the Salad is on the edge of 2*. I feel that it's alright since it's under 2*. There's plenty of sets without cups too

Fixed all

1. Well, to be honest I have nothing to add, however it should be noted that there is a nice map, as was to be expected.

1. 00:00:170 (1) - I expected the start to be simple, but not so much, I would recommend making individual sliders, in such a way that the distances were increasing, something like this. Based on that pattern, you can do mirror effect, to give more variety to the map and not to stay in something as simple as "repeats" and more in an overdose.
2. 00:15:170 (1) - As I mentioned at the beginning, large "repeats" do not give good aesthetic to an overdose, that's why I suggest you do what comes in the picture. Same pattern can be applied 00:18:503 (1) - here.
3. Well, I think there is no remedy when explaining pattern by pattern, that is, I want to generalize, that I am not so fanatical about simple patterns in this type of difficulty, that is why I will point out some where based on your criteria you will decide if to leave them Or make the attempt to change them: 00:30:170 (1) - 00:31:836 (1) - 00:33:503 (1) - 00:35:170 (1) - 00:36:836 (1) - etc. As you can see, there is a beat that has been omitted in each of the repeats, that's why it's in your hands.
4. Well, I think there is nothing more to comment, it is a good overdose, very clean and concise, lucky.

1. 00:11:767 (7,1) - An hyper can be good, since it's a loud sound, move it approximately where the note (1) is, then move the note (1) to the left.
3. 00:32:253 (2,3) - I honestly do not think a hyper fit between those notes, I suggest you remove it, but be careful not to make a bad gap.
4. I honestly do not think a hyper fit between those notes, I suggest you remove it, but be careful not to make a bad gap.

Jusenkyo wrote:

[ Overdose]

1. 00:00:170 (1) - I expected the start to be simple, but not so much, I would recommend making individual sliders, in such a way that the distances were increasing, something like this. Based on that pattern, you can do mirror effect, to give more variety to the map and not to stay in something as simple as "repeats" and more in an overdose. im not very satisfied with the option you gave me.
   the current version is still very interactive as you still have to dash between each break. i'll consider doing something about the "repeats", but i couldn't come up with something good right now.
   
   
2. 00:15:170 (1) - As I mentioned at the beginning, large "repeats" do not give good aesthetic to an overdose, that's why I suggest you do what comes in the picture. Same pattern can be applied 00:18:503 (1) - here. since i'm following the vocals, repeat sliders seemed to work out the best because if i mapped it like you suggested, it would more or less follow the general rhythm of the song rather than the vocals alone which wasn't my intention.
   
   
3. Well, I think there is no remedy when explaining pattern by pattern, that is, I want to generalize, that I am not so fanatical about simple patterns in this type of difficulty, that is why I will point out some where based on your criteria you will decide if to leave them Or make the attempt to change them: 00:30:170 (1) - 00:31:836 (1) - 00:33:503 (1) - 00:35:170 (1) - 00:36:836 (1) - etc. As you can see, there is a beat that has been omitted in each of the repeats, that's why it's in your hands. refer to the answer above

[ Rain]

1. 00:11:767 (7,1) - An hyper can be good, since it's a loud sound, move it approximately where the note (1) is, then move the note (1) to the left. that is clever. fixed
   
   
2. 00:32:253 (2,3) - I honestly do not think a hyper fit between those notes, I suggest you remove it, but be careful not to make a bad gap. sure, i didnt use hyper on these vocal beats in the rest of this section so.

BoberOfDarkness wrote:

00:18:295 (5) - you could move it a bit far from borderline since you got a lot space here

00:29:336 (1,2,3,4) - curve this to be consistent with other streams you had mapped

00:55:170 (1,2,3,4) - you could use here hyper dashes or at least spaced this since music calls for stronger jumps here hdashes would feel overdone as this would be the only time ive used hdashes 4 times in a row which is an odd contrast against the kiai since this part will be more intense.

0:56:836 (1,2) - I guess that there's lack of a hyperdash [/list]

weren't the diff nerfed a lot? it used to be 5.2* which aint that bad of a nerf as it also fixed spread issues