Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

Allie Crystal - Burning Bright

posted
Total Posts
53
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on sábado, 02 de junio de 2018 at 20:34:02

Artist: Allie Crystal
Title: Burning Bright
Source: League of Legends
Tags: lol poppy jinx lulu lux janna star guardian guardianas estelares song Cloudchaser
BPM: 154
Filesize: 16880kb
Play Time: 01:35
Difficulties Available:
  1. Cloudchaser's Hard (3,51 stars, 213 notes)
  2. Easy (1,43 stars, 64 notes)
  3. Normal (1,86 stars, 95 notes)
Download: Allie Crystal - Burning Bright
Download: Allie Crystal - Burning Bright (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
BURNING BRIGHT!
>.<!
Map Finished!
Easy By: ME! (100%)
Normal By: ME! (100%)
Hard By: CloudChaser (100%)

CloudChaser Profile: https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1576498

May the Stars Lead Your Way!

Ready for modding! :D
Last edited by July - San , edited 56 times in total.
UselessXD
36 posts
Joined August 2016
UselessXD
Hi, from my queue ;p

Cloud
00:22:207 (3,4,5,6,7) - I would delete this sequence and do something like this: 00:22:402 - circle, 00:22:596 - bounced 1/4 slider, 00:23:181 - circle, 00:23:376 - bounced 1/4 slider.
00:39:252 (10) - Think about deleting this circle.
00:39:642 - Add there a circle (you will strengthen 'main white' point like you did earlier and late).
00:51:038 (6) - 3/8 slider will probably fit it better.
01:10:324 (9) - Make this slider 1/4 and move this - 01:10:811 (10) to 01:10:713 .
01:15:194 (6) - Go for 1/4 slider, 01:15:778 (1,2) - move it to 01:15:583
01:16:947 - put 2 circles <before the slider> (create the 3stack)
01:28:343 (5,9) - I think that these circles make this part overmapped, delete them.

Also I'm not sure about using this amount of sound effects.. But i know nothing about hitsounding so whatever :P

Nice diff. Good luck! :D
Nekoraw
98 posts
Joined March 2014
Nekoraw
m4m :D
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/679698
General
- disable widescreen support since you dont use a storyboard
- it will be nicer to map at 154bpm instead of 77bpm, so you dont need to map streams at 1/8


Cloud
- i think it would be better a NC on this, 00:20:843 (7) - , and dont create a new combo here 00:21:038 (1) -
- it will be nicer to put a spinner from 01:03:116 to 01:05:843

Normal
- NC here 00:24:155 (4) - and not here 00:24:934 (1) - , maybe newbie players cant read this
- you havent put a kiai here from 00:42:856 to 00:55:226 since you did on Cloud diff
- there is some overlaps normal players cant read
- why a nc here? 01:28:830 (1) -

Easy
- this easy diff is listed as normal in AiMod, try to decrease the star rating https://puu.sh/y4v80/916ead07dc.png
- no kiai here to from 00:42:856 to 00:55:226

btw i had difficulties to find issues in this mapset, good luck :)
Daycore
918 posts
Joined January 2015
Daycore
M4M / !!! BAD GRAMMAR INCOMING !!!

Hello!

General

- BPM is 154, not 77.
- turn off the widescreen support

Cloud
00:19:489 (5) - NC here
00:22:217 (4) - NC here too
00:20:853 (1) - turn off the nc
00:26:103 (6) - NC here
00:27:272 (1,2) - turn off nc on 1 and turn on nc on 2
00:36:428 (9,10,1) - why did you changed the spacing?
00:51:817 (10,11) - ^
01:23:376 (1,2,3,4) - can you make something like this? - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9380040
01:28:830 (8,9,10) - random triple
01:29:609 (1,2,3) - ^

Good luck and thanks for your mod! :)
[ESKA]
58 posts
Joined January 2015
[ESKA]
Hi
M4M req

Easy
are u sure that 1.8 distance spacing is good idea? cuz i am not sure about spacing at overall
00:47:531 (3,4) - these sliders too close to each other
01:10:518 (1) - move it to x:144 y:232 and this 01:10:908 (2) - to x:184 y:328 its made your map easier to read
01:19:869 (3,1) - this looks wrong for my eyes, idk try to make slider rounder
01:22:207 (2,3) - wrong overlapping

Normal
00:05:453 (1,2,3,4,5) - this part looks terribly, try to reduce spacing and make sliders more evenly
00:54:155 (1,2,1,2) - this might be difficult to read

Cloud
00:27:272 (1,2) - make it blanket and then fix that 00:28:635 (3,4)
01:32:337 (3,4,5,6,1) - better make shot stream instead of stack
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

Rus_Brony_osu wrote:

M4M / !!! BAD GRAMMAR INCOMING !!!

Hello!

General

- BPM is 154, not 77. Thanks for the help!
- turn off the widescreen support

Cloud
00:19:489 (5) - NC here
00:22:217 (4) - NC here too
00:20:853 (1) - turn off the nc
00:26:103 (6) - NC here
00:27:272 (1,2) - turn off nc on 1 and turn on nc on 2
00:36:428 (9,10,1) - why did you changed the spacing?
00:51:817 (10,11) - ^
01:23:376 (1,2,3,4) - can you make something like this? - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9380040
01:28:830 (8,9,10) - random triple
01:29:609 (1,2,3) - ^

Good luck and thanks for your mod! :)
:D
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

[ESKA] wrote:

Hi
M4M req

Easy
are u sure that 1.8 distance spacing is good idea? cuz i am not sure about spacing at overall I already fixed that with bpm
00:47:531 (3,4) - these sliders too close to each other Fix!
01:10:518 (1) - move it to x:144 y:232 and this 01:10:908 (2) - to x:184 y:328 its made your map easier to read Sorry, I did not understand you
01:19:869 (3,1) - this looks wrong for my eyes, idk try to make slider rounder okey
01:22:207 (2,3) - wrong overlapping ?

Normal
00:05:453 (1,2,3,4,5) - this part looks terribly, try to reduce spacing and make sliders more evenly okey?
00:54:155 (1,2,1,2) - this might be difficult to read fix?

Cloud
00:27:272 (1,2) - make it blanket and then fix that 00:28:635 (3,4)
01:32:337 (3,4,5,6,1) - better make shot stream instead of stack
Yusomi
553 posts
Joined March 2014
Yusomi
hii delivering my m4m~

Cloud
00:23:181 (7,8) - maybe make spacing same as 00:22:986 (6,7) -
00:31:557 (4) - move this to the right a little so it's directly in the middle of 00:31:168 (3,6) -
00:33:116 (9,2) - maybe stack em?
00:45:583 (9,10) - maybe space these similar to 00:44:415 (5,6) -
01:08:960 (4,7) - you could stack the 7 under 4's sliderend
01:10:324 (9,10,11) - i think it's best to even space these
01:21:817 (5,8) - you could fix stacking here to make it prettier
01:25:908 (10,11,12) - make spacing even here?
01:28:051 (4,5,6) - make these similar to 01:28:830 (8,9,10) - for consistency

Normal
Press Ctrl+Shft+A and check the box that says "Check distance snap", there are many issues with this difficulty here :o
00:24:155 (1,2,3) - stuff like this isn't allowed in normal diffs
00:45:973 (2,3,4) - and 00:47:531 (5,6) - , this isn't suitable for a normal diff either, new players will be confused by this

Easy
Similar to the normal AIMod finds many issues in this map
00:51:038 (1,3) - it's best to avoid any sort of overlap in easy diffs

good luck !
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

Yusomi wrote:

hii delivering my m4m~

Cloud
00:23:181 (7,8) - maybe make spacing same as 00:22:986 (6,7) -
00:31:557 (4) - move this to the right a little so it's directly in the middle of 00:31:168 (3,6) -
00:33:116 (9,2) - maybe stack em?
00:45:583 (9,10) - maybe space these similar to 00:44:415 (5,6) -
01:08:960 (4,7) - you could stack the 7 under 4's sliderend
01:10:324 (9,10,11) - i think it's best to even space these
01:21:817 (5,8) - you could fix stacking here to make it prettier
01:25:908 (10,11,12) - make spacing even here?
01:28:051 (4,5,6) - make these similar to 01:28:830 (8,9,10) - for consistency

Normal
Press Ctrl+Shft+A and check the box that says "Check distance snap", there are many issues with this difficulty here :o
Sorry for the mistakes in "Distance Snap" I will try to fix them so that it does not go so badly
00:24:155 (1,2,3) - stuff like this isn't allowed in normal diffs fix?
00:45:973 (2,3,4) - and 00:47:531 (5,6) - , this isn't suitable for a normal diff either, new players will be confused by thisfix


Easy
Similar to the normal AIMod finds many issues in this map sorry
00:51:038 (1,3) - it's best to avoid any sort of overlap in easy diffs fix!

good luck !
Dokatu
39 posts
Joined November 2016
Dokatu
MOD 4 MOD

His mod - CLICK

If there are errors in words, grammar - I'm sorry.



Easy :

  1. Slider velocity should not change. It should be x1.00.
  2. Distance snap should not be changed. It should be from 0.8x to 1.2x.
  3. 01:30:778 (5) - Try this.
  4. 00:30:778 (1,3) - These sliders should be made the same. Better copy the slider 3. (CTRL + C)
Normal :

  1. 00:28:830 (1,2,3,4,5) - Try to do it.
    Big Picture
Cloud :

  1. 01:08:570 (3,4) - 3 slider CTRL + C and put it in place of the slider 4.
  2. Put NC on the selected ticks. (In the normal, too.)
And so ... The map is good. Good luck!
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

XFroceS wrote:

MOD 4 MOD

His mod - CLICK

If there are errors in words, grammar - I'm sorry.



Easy :

  1. Slider velocity should not change. It should be x1.00. FIX!
  2. Distance snap should not be changed. It should be from 0.8x to 1.2x.
  3. 01:30:778 (5) - Try this. ok and fix
  4. 00:30:778 (1,3) - These sliders should be made the same. Better copy the slider 3. (CTRL + C)
fix?
Normal :

  1. 00:28:830 (1,2,3,4,5) - Try to do it.
    Big Picture
Cloud :

  1. 01:08:570 (3,4) - 3 slider CTRL + C and put it in place of the slider 4.
  2. Put NC on the selected ticks. (In the normal, too.) fix
And so ... The map is good. Good luck!
Thanks you, and Thanks for the mod!
_MMMMMM_MMMMMM_
80 posts
Joined September 2016
_MMMMMM_MMMMMM_
Bueno, acá va mi primer mod de STD. No tengo mucha experiencia ni siquiera jugándolo, pero como prometí M4M voy a hacer el intento :P.

  • Easy
1) 00:29:220 - De acuerdo al ranking criteria, los cambios de velocidad de slider pueden ser aplicados únicamente cuando hay un cambio notorio en el ritmo. Se me hace un poco brusco que arranque en la mitad de un combo (y en un slider de 1/1) para una dificultad Easy. Tampoco veo muy necesario el cambio dado que no hay una variación importante en el ritmo durante toda la canción. Mi sugerencia sería borrar los cambios de velocidad en esta dificultad (claro que podés ignorarla).

2) 00:54:155 - Creo que acá podés poner un spinner, obviamente cambiando este objeto 00:52:207 (2) - por dos sliders de 1/1 o fijandote una manera que resulte cómodo para un principiante. Obviamente queda a tu elección c:

3) Nuevamente volviendo al tema de la vel. del deslizador, desconozco la razón de por qué el 90% del mapa tiene la velocidad en 1.20x, pero lo veo innecesario y más para una easy. En caso que 1.0x te resulte demasiado lento, quizás en vez de recurrir a inherited points puedas directamente subir la velocidad del deslizador general (aunque no estoy seguro de si haya una regla sobre eso, como un numero máximo o algo por el estilo).

  • Normal
1) De acuerdo al ranking criteria, el OD en dificultad Normal debe estar entre 3 y 5. Y el de esta dificultad es 6.

2) 00:51:038 (1,2,3) - Ok, esto me parece un poco inapropiado. Nuevamente citando el ranking criteria, en dificultad normal hay que evitar colocar objetos a 1/2 de distancia de un slider. "Los jugadores en este nivel siguen completamente las rutas de los sliders, por lo que colocar un objeto golpeado directamente después del control del slider es más intuitivo"; y acá pusiste 3 objetos seguidos a 1/2, lo cual es un poco complicado para ser Normal...

3) Lo mismo que el punto 2) acá 00:54:155 (1,1,1) -

4) 01:10:518 (2,1) - Esto puede ser confuso para los principiantes de acuerdo al ranking criteria, sugeriría que evites sobreponer circles encima de sliders.

5) 01:15:583 (3,4,5) - Bueno, acá no se si sea necesario aclarar acá y en los próximos patrones de 1/2. Igualmente no sé mucho sobre este modo, así que podría estar equivocándome al decir que son inapropiados :thinking:. Así que, lo dejo a tu criterio.

  • Cloud
La verdad no puedo decir mucho de esta dificultad, pienso que está muy bien. Así que sólo me voy a limitar a decir un par de cositas:

1) Imagino que la dificultad sería lo equivalente a Hard. Según el ranking criteria hay que evitar mezclar ritmos de 1/2 y 1/4 en un mismo combo, "los diferentes ritmos de esta densidad sin indicación de espaciado pueden causar problemas de lectura"

2) 00:31:947 (6) - Este slider está 1 beat más largo de lo que debería. Termina acá 00:32:142 - . Ocurre lo mismo acá 00:38:181 (6) -

Es todo de mi parte. Espero haberte sido de ayuda ~ c:
Maxylan
242 posts
Joined May 2014
Maxylan
M4M From your queue ~
Also star guardian background from League of Legends is so overused in Osu! lol

Cloud
[General]

I'm pretty disappointed in the movements, because it's a "Hard" difficulty, which doesn't have a lot of speed or spacing, this could be forgiven, however I would love to see this mapped in a more fluent way, for example, skipping 00:22:986 (6,7) - 00:24:544 (2,3) - the cursor walking in favor of something that flows better. You could also work a lot more on your aesthetics, for instance, using more consistent slider shapes and stacking objects instead of overlapping, as well as exploring different distances to emphasize sounds in the song.
Also, helpful advice, try and keep new combos under 9-8 :)
[]
  1. I would love to see all your diffs start at this point 00:05:454 - with spinners, the sound on that point and the simular sounds that follows are perfect for spinners.
  2. 00:24:934 (4) - Try and avoid hitsounding when there's no sound in the song to emphasise, same goes if the sound in the song doesn't even exist/match the hitsound.
  3. 00:27:272 (1,2) - This is, bad, for aesthetics, to say the least. Try and think of overlaps like this:
    Overlaps does not mean bad.
    Alot of overlaps or severe overlaps does mean bad.
    Overlaps can always be avoided and should always be avoided if possible.
    Same goes for most other overlaps I see in this diff.
  4. 00:29:025 - You missed a pretty important sound in favor of emphasizing the vocals, which is something that should be avoided whenever possible as well. You could, for example, make 00:28:830 (4) - into a 1/2 slider and putting a repeat arrow on it, that way it covers the drums as well as emphasize the vocals.
  5. 00:30:778 (2,3) - Here you focus on vocals yet here 00:32:337 (7) - You skip them entirely (notice the red tick on 00:32:531 - )
    Also, 00:31:947 (6,7) - since you have never used 1/4 timegaps up to that point, you should make it more obvious to the player that there will be a 1/4 timegap (i.e make for example 00:32:337 (7) - stand out more, or have it stacked under 00:31:947 (6) - , or do the same thing you did on 00:38:181 (6,7) - )
  6. 00:33:311 (10,11,1) - This could be emphasized by moving it further away, making the sound stand out more, however since it has the tripple stacked on it this is fine.
  7. HOWEVER! These two 00:34:869 (3,4) - are on top of pretty important stand-out drum sounds, and because they don't have a tripple on them I suggest moving them further away to give a much clearer emphasis to the drum sound.
    Same goes for 00:37:791 (5) - and many more instances
  8. 00:38:960 (8,9,10,11,12) - This takes me back to what I wrote in "General", try and think of things that actually flow, because cursor walking is not flow.
    If I'm going to use more simple terminology, use sharper angles between objects, 00:38:960 (8) - currently has a very VERY wide angle, around 130 degrees if I should estimate. Keeping angles between objects under 90 degrees not only looks pleasing but also plays more fluently.
    Because I wrote it in General it means I see this problem alot, this was just one example, and this is just my opinion. Keep in mind the rules I stated above are not as important for "Hards, normals and easy" because of these low SR's very limited speed and movement.
  9. 00:52:012 (11,12,1) - This tripple/double whatever you want to call it, is unwarranted, it feels like it's mapped on top of nothing.
  10. 00:53:765 (1,2) - Bodies imply counter intuative movement.
  11. 00:54:934 (3) - 01:19:674 (9) - Why not use a stream here, or a tripple, or anyhing like you did previously?
  12. 01:07:402 (4,5,6,1) - The tripple on 4,5,6 leads very poorly into the slider 1.
  13. 01:08:960 (4,7) - 01:21:817 (5,8) - reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee stack plz
  14. 01:10:518 - Once again an important sound missed, already explained earlier in the mod so wont go into detail again
  15. 01:32:337 (3,4,5,6,1) - ReeeeeeeeeeeEEEEE Now you use stacks and you didn't earlier?

Sorry I only modded one diff, I'm kindof pressed for time atm. Here's a video of a cat with a sombrero as an apology

Ikira
161 posts
Joined March 2015
Ikira
HELLUUUU
here's my bad english mod! xd

[Easy]

00:17:921 (1) - why is this slider not symmetric?
ahhh all your sliders aren't symmetric... symmetric sliders are prettier than unsymmetric sliders... (hope you know what i mean)
mhh wait make more sliders symmetric, not all :3
00:43:246 (1,2,3) - don't overlap it's hard for beginners
01:14:804 (1) - i think you should stack this circle on 01:15:194 (2) - this slider
01:23:376 (4,5) - don't overlap

[Normal]

00:11:687 (3) - i think you should make an prettier slider like this 00:05:454 (1) -
00:24:155 (1,2) - overlaaappp it's not so pretty
00:46:363 (3) - what's this for a slider? xd
i like your normal diff

[Cloud]

00:55:713 - 01:04:674 - i think... beauty looong slider are good in this break

01:32:337 (3,4,5,6,1) - don't stack make a ''flow'' stream

i love this diff *Q* :D

I hope my Mod was helpful... i think your map is really good and good luck!
RVMathew
985 posts
Joined December 2013
RVMathew
Hola! Que Tal?

Returning m4m. Note that I am a bit rusty at modding. Also any points I make may overlap with the previous

General
1) When opening the map, there was an error with the video; it seems like it is not added properly. Please fix.

Top Diff
Rhythm seems fine, so I will be focusing on the aesthetic portion of the map.
1) 00:19:479 (5) - The wave slider looks uneven. Please fix.
2) 00:22:596 (5,6,7,8) - The pattern looks uneven due to the visual spacing. Tidy it up so it looks like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9404321
3) 00:28:830 (4,5,6) - Here the music starts to build up a bit. To reflect that, you can increase the distance between 4 and 5 (say 1.3-1.4x apart).
4) 00:37:402 (4,5,6,7) - This part looks very clumsy; the distance between the notes varies quite a bit, and 6 and 7 are way too close.
5) 00:48:116 (8,9) - If you were trying to create a blanket, it is very off. Please fix if that is the case.
6) 00:49:479 (2) - Again the wave slider looks uneven.
7) 01:06:233 (1,2,3) - The music does build up a bit, so you can try and reflect it by making the distance between each successive slider a little bit bigger if you want.
8) 01:07:791 (1,2,3) - Why is the distance between 1 and 2, and 2 and 3 different when there is no obvious change in the music? Please make the distance consistent.
9) 01:08:570 (3,4) - Make the sliders the same shape; it looks better that way.
10) 01:09:739 (7) - Stack this underneath 01:08:960 (4) properly; as it is 7 is not stacked neatly, so it looks bad that way.

The rhythm is fine but the map looks very clumsy. Spend some time making the map a lot more neat.

Normal
1) 00:44:025 (4) - I recommend splitting the repeat slider into a note followed by a 1/1 slider. This way you can capture the vocals a lot better.
2) 00:49:090 (2) - Blanket is off.
3) 00:52:207 (3,5) - The overlap does not look nice. Try and remove the overlap.

Good luck with the mod. Again note that at the time of writing this you did have an outstanding mod post to reply to, so some of the stuff may have already been addressed.
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

RVMathew wrote:

Hola! Que Tal?

Returning m4m. Note that I am a bit rusty at modding. Also any points I make may overlap with the previous

General
1) When opening the map, there was an error with the video; it seems like it is not added properly. Please fix. Maybe it's a bug..

Top Diff
Rhythm seems fine, so I will be focusing on the aesthetic portion of the map.
1) 00:19:479 (5) - The wave slider looks uneven. Please fix.
2) 00:22:596 (5,6,7,8) - The pattern looks uneven due to the visual spacing. Tidy it up so it looks like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9404321
3) 00:28:830 (4,5,6) - Here the music starts to build up a bit. To reflect that, you can increase the distance between 4 and 5 (say 1.3-1.4x apart).
4) 00:37:402 (4,5,6,7) - This part looks very clumsy; the distance between the notes varies quite a bit, and 6 and 7 are way too close.
5) 00:48:116 (8,9) - If you were trying to create a blanket, it is very off. Please fix if that is the case.
6) 00:49:479 (2) - Again the wave slider looks uneven.
7) 01:06:233 (1,2,3) - The music does build up a bit, so you can try and reflect it by making the distance between each successive slider a little bit bigger if you want.
8) 01:07:791 (1,2,3) - Why is the distance between 1 and 2, and 2 and 3 different when there is no obvious change in the music? Please make the distance consistent.
9) 01:08:570 (3,4) - Make the sliders the same shape; it looks better that way.
10) 01:09:739 (7) - Stack this underneath 01:08:960 (4) properly; as it is 7 is not stacked neatly, so it looks bad that way.

The rhythm is fine but the map looks very clumsy. Spend some time making the map a lot more neat.

Normal
1) 00:44:025 (4) - I recommend splitting the repeat slider into a note followed by a 1/1 slider. This way you can capture the vocals a lot better. fix
2) 00:49:090 (2) - Blanket is off.
3) 00:52:207 (3,5) - The overlap does not look nice. Try and remove the overlap. FIX!

Good luck with the mod. Again note that at the time of writing this you did have an outstanding mod post to reply to, so some of the stuff may have already been addressed.
Hectic
511 posts
Joined August 2015
Hectic
Hi, m4m here

cloud:
  1. 00:22:207 (4,5,6,7,8) - you seem to follow vocal mostly while maintaining filler rhythm, perhaps try something like this to emphasize lyrics ("so pure, so bright")
  2. 00:26:298 (2,3,1) - again, this rhythm doesn't rrepresent vocal well, something like this should work
  3. 00:27:272 (1,2) - make this overlap cleaner? something like this
  4. 00:28:635 (3,4,5,6,1) - music in this section changes DRASTICALLY, but maps feels the same. you really should represent change in music by making this section more intense so it gives the same feeling as the music (some circles, mini-jumps, anything that makes contrast with previous section would work)
  5. 00:33:116 (9,1) - swap ncs? didn't quite get why they are like this
  6. 00:38:181 (6,7) - you should not place object so close to each other because it doesn't fit with overall style of the map
  7. 00:52:109 (12) - why this note here?
  8. 00:54:934 (3) - mostly personal preference, but how about 5 notes here instead of slider?
  9. 00:55:324 - why did you decide to end break earlier? o.o
  10. 01:07:402 (4,5,6,1) - listen closely - note should be here 01:07:694 - , not here 01:07:499 (5) -
  11. 01:07:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - honestly, i can't figure out what's happening with the rhythm in this whole section, its probably not your fault but music's or im just dumb
  12. 01:20:259 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - as for this section, theres major change in music - halfbpm, drums become twice less dense, but you don't represent this change in any way, rhythm is 1/2 filler as always, no sv change. besides that, there are a lot of 1/4 drums which you ignore but usually you represent 1/4 drums rhythm
  13. also generally i'd suggest adjusting spacing so maps looks neater. Try to keep you objects within the same distance between each other, it really does a lot of work for visual aspect
Hope I was somewhat helpful. If you have any questions, i'd be happy to answer them. Good luck!
Last edited by Hectic , edited 1 time in total.
Maxylan
242 posts
Joined May 2014
Maxylan
July San you should prioritize responding to mods when you receive them, not only is it bad form to leave them be but also without responding to mods and fixing their problems, alot of people just run the risk of repeating the same stuff.

Also, yeah if you want the map ranked you have to respond, so, there's that. Check this link if you don't believe me: https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Ranking_Criteria/Code_of_Conduct
m3gB3g
275 posts
Joined January 2015
m3gB3g
hi~ m4m time!

SPOILER
warning:bad eng bcs rus
Cloud

I think this map needs more spinners! Bcs these spinners gonna fit vocal perfect also you will evade breaks and empty unmapped places. (Also ranking criteria says you should have 80%+ track space mapped)

Here my spinner offers:
1) start spinner at 00:05:454 (1) - end here-> 00:10:129 -
2) start 00:11:687 - end 00:16:363 -
3) start 00:55:421 - end 00:59:999 -
4) start 01:01:363 - end 01:04:674 -
I hope you will add them.Dont forget put spinners in low diffs after.

00:33:116 (9) - i think you should stack this with 00:33:895 (2) - . Bcs for me this move seems excess in diff (i mean he is only one in all diff )
00:22:207 (4) - nc



Normal

00:17:921 (1,2) - in low diffs object should have perfect flow for newbies! This pattern have too sharp angle also sliders dont have way for good flow...
00:19:479 (3,1) - for example here it seems awfull.
00:28:830 (1,2,3,4) - its too...
Okay this Normal diff should be remapped bcs you ignoring too many ranking criteria..
I recommend you to take look another ranked low diffs also read ranking criteria, guide and advances in forum for gitgud
For example: Press Ctrl+A . Your objects MUST cover all playfield (at least ~90%)

Easy

Same issues like in" Normal". You need remap this diff .
Top diff seems good but you need to do a lot of things in low diffs. GL you can do it!
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

m3gB3g wrote:

hi~ m4m time!

SPOILER
warning:bad eng bcs rus
Cloud

I think this map needs more spinners! Bcs these spinners gonna fit vocal perfect also you will evade breaks and empty unmapped places. (Also ranking criteria says you should have 80%+ track space mapped)

Here my spinner offers:
1) start spinner at 00:05:454 (1) - end here-> 00:10:129 -
2) start 00:11:687 - end 00:16:363 -
3) start 00:55:421 - end 00:59:999 -
4) start 01:01:363 - end 01:04:674 -
I hope you will add them.Dont forget put spinners in low diffs after.

00:33:116 (9) - i think you should stack this with 00:33:895 (2) - . Bcs for me this move seems excess in diff (i mean he is only one in all diff )
00:22:207 (4) - nc ok



Normal

00:17:921 (1,2) - in low diffs object should have perfect flow for newbies! This pattern have too sharp angle also sliders dont have way for good flow...
00:19:479 (3,1) - for example here it seems awfull.
00:28:830 (1,2,3,4) - its too...
Okay this Normal diff should be remapped bcs you ignoring too many ranking criteria..
I recommend you to take look another ranked low diffs also read ranking criteria, guide and advances in forum for gitgud
For example: Press Ctrl+A . Your objects MUST cover all playfield (at least ~90%)
i will try to fix it!
Easy

Same issues like in" Normal". You need remap this diff . okay, i can try
Top diff seems good but you need to do a lot of things in low diffs. GL you can do it!
Thanks for your mod! :)
July - San
137 posts
Joined July 2016
Topic Starter
July - San

Maxylan wrote:

July San you should prioritize responding to mods when you receive them, not only is it bad form to leave them be but also without responding to mods and fixing their problems, alot of people just run the risk of repeating the same stuff.

Also, yeah if you want the map ranked you have to respond, so, there's that. Check this link if you don't believe me: https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Ranking_Criteria/Code_of_Conduct
I have to wait until the cloud comes back to read the mods of its diff, please wait :| :|
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 53