Californian wrote:

Hi, I probably should have noticed/spoken up sooner but as of recent maps, I don't think "東方Project" is a valid source anymore. Instead, the recent maps seem to favor more of the game's direct source titles instead of just touhou.

So the correct source of this map should be "東方花映塚　～ Phantasmagoria of Flower View."
source

best of luck ranking the map!

Absolute Zero wrote:

Just a reminder to address the mod above for source; I would agree that would be preferable. yya

[Last Judgement]
00:41:580 (5) - Don't think this should be a 1/4 slider as I don't really hear anything that justifies the end of the slider. This comment applies to other sections like 00:45:370 (4) and 00:52:949 (5). the slider was to hold out the sound that its mapped over
00:46:317 (2,3,4,5,6) - This feels weirdly underspaced compared to something like 00:38:738 (2,3,4,5). the reason it's different is because it still provides a different movement for each note while being a different pattern than the one you mentioned. will space them out though instead of changing completely
00:48:212 (3) - Stronger sound is on the end of this slider right here. Make these two hitcircles with a dash in between instead. You run into a similar problem as places like 00:48:212 (3) and 00:54:843 (5). definitely trying to avoid too many dashes at the start so all applied except for that part
01:22:633 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Feels like this stream is a bit overmapped tbh--if you could give justification for these 1/4 streams that would be nice. overmapped ur right, changed
01:31:791 (2,3,4,5) - Personally I don’t really like this pattern here—It’s kinda bland and standstill. i like the pattern but i spaced it out to make it less standstill
01:33:054 (1,2) - Would accompany the pitch increase with a stronger dash. done
01:36:528 (4,1) - This is completely walkable but still is a pitch increase. I would increase distancing. done
01:49:889 (1,2,3,1,2) - These sliders are pretty constricted to the center. I would consider making the pattern more mobile. was aiming for some slight symmetry here, it's my _ _ _ _ _!
02:00:439 (3) - I think this slider works better as a 1/2 slider. i feel like im missing too much of the sound that way
02:15:486 (2,1) - Increase distancing a little more to accent the huge pitch change. I would move (2) leftwards. big agree
02:24:059 (2,3) - I would making this (3,4) larger than (2,3), even making (2,3) almost stagnant. This is because the melody doesn’t change pitch until (3,4). done
03:28:766 (3,4,5,6) - I think this pattern is excessive for the soft sounds it’s hitting. lowered spacing but i think its fine
04:34:910 (4,5) - The bell sound is quite strong; I would consider making this a stronger dash to reflect that. did that
04:44:125 (4,1) - Consider increasing this to a hyper because of the new phrase and a strong bell and higher pitch in the melody. done done
04:58:268 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - The same music is treated differently between these two patterns. ya fix
05:13:697 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - what the fuck was the accordionist drunk here (working snapping out) owob wasnt sure what consensus you came to so its still the same
05:15:411 (1) - Covering a note with a slider at 05:15:518. Make this three hitcircles instead. ya
05:51:298 (1,2) - I always miss this pattern for some reason—I’m used to it being a 1/4 hypers like at 05:50:698 (5,6). Maybe it’s just me. i feel like it plays fine :,
07:19:704 (5,6,7,8) - Personally, I’m not a huge fan of this pattern as it kinda sticks out a little too much compared to the flow you have before. You can keep it if you want, but I would suggest changing it. at long last i have changed this pattern
08:34:490 (1,2,3,4) - What are these notes following?

alienflybot wrote:

08:34:490 (1,2,3) - Strange. I find 08:34:490 - 08:35:134 - similar to 08:33:159 - 08:33:790 - so both parts should be mapped with the same timeline. As it is impossible to put a 1/1 reversed slider here to cross with multiple offset lines, how about replacing 08:34:490 (1,2) - with circles and add dashes between each other?

^ explanation, was two sliders before to cover the sound (1) starts on
08:36:974 (2,3) - Would make this a hyper to accent the drum. really wanna keep my vision of no hypers at the end :'(

FoxyGrandpa wrote:

recheck!

00:07:879 - u should really map here cuz it sounds nice never
06:16:900 - could u lower the bpom here its a little fast thx not done


okay call me back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Storyboarder wrote:

sb finished! thanks for waiting

FoxyGrandpa wrote:

alright looks good!


bbbbbbbbbubbled!

Absolute 0 wrote:

hey its me ABSOLUTE ZERO here's your bubble fii:

Absolute Zero wrote:

just coming back for this quick stuff
00:55:475 (2,3,4,5) - Saw this as well--same overmap argument as mentioned before--I only hear sounds every 1/2.
08:37:249 - Two conflicting timing points here in terms of sample set. Change the uninherited to S:C5.

Ascendance wrote:

hi

08:34:490 (1,2,3,4) - please fix this as we discussed, should definitely be 1/1 and is not unrankable at all, dunno why afb said that
hp -> 6

6* marathon and it's hp5, too forgiving for sure

hopefully the twitter meme dies, gl

Absolute Zero wrote:

Had a very long discussion with Nokashi, celerih, Hareimu, and Fii about this a while ago and decided that it's best that we approximate in evenly for playing and to an extent (as much as I hate to use this word) aesthetics. The relatively exact snapping actually plays on 1/12 and 1/16 ticks, and looks visibly uneven in play. I'm not going to post the screenshot as it is a sore sight.

Kisses wrote:

@AZ Yes I can see that but having 05:13:697 (1) and 05:15:411 (1) play as constant 1/4s and 05:14:554 (1) as constant 1/6 does feel like a sin, given the fact there is almost no contrast between the 3 sections. This is why I stated it come across as very artificial.


edit: @wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww what are the different instruments you're mapping?

Kisses wrote:

edit: @wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww what are the different instruments you're mapping?

Ascendance wrote:

there was no 1/16 and only 1 1/12 in the snapping I discussed with others.

Ascendance wrote:

find something that works better then instead of implying i'm not doing a good enough job fixing your map

-wwwww wrote:

Kisses wrote:

edit: @wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww what are the different instruments you're mapping?

accordion and then the percussion

Kisses wrote:

The percussion does include some 1/6 snaps but it's definitely not a continuous, maybe overmapping would be what some people would go for but it does clash with a problem that I'll state below.

You've mapped the accordion > percussion > accordion all in the space of a few seconds. Switching layers this frequently sounds incredibly off putting and focusing on one instrument is much preferred over mapping different instruments as you please. It does come off as awkward to switch to percussion from the accordion after when the accordion is still very much audible to the player and you've shown so much focus to it at the start

alienflybot wrote:

Recheck!

█ Optional to change --- █ Suggested to change --- █ Unrankable

[ General]

• 
  Tags

1. Remove 'phantasmagoria flower view' as these words are included in the Source.

[ Last Judgement]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 02:15:174 (1,2,1) - Movement here seems to be lacking a bit, so the emphasis at this point is not so well. Maybe you can try this: Ctrl+H 02:13:955 (1,2,1) - altogether and move this to x:428. In that way, the mentioned part will become back and forth movements which can emphasize the beat at 02:15:799 (1) - pretty well by the dash.
2. 02:17:631 (1,2) - Why not a dash? Feels a bit inconsistent since most of these long slider patterns have dashes between each other (for emphasizing Whistles), such as 02:12:128 (1,2) - .
3. 02:25:591 (2) - Maybe change this to 1/2 patterns? The beat at the red tick, i.e. 02:25:900 - is not mapped.
4. 07:08:103 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Maybe just keep them being NC'ed every 2 complete white tick snaps? Only this part has denser amount of NC while the later-on parts are less dense (with at least 6-8 combo each).
5. 07:53:710 (7) - How about inclining this more to the vertical? I think this is less intense than the parts at 07:52:535 (1) - and 07:54:102 (1) - .
6. 07:58:997 (3,4) - I find the distance here a bit large, mind shortening it by moving (4) to x:444 or a few pixel larger? In this case the distance is likely similar to the inner distance of a 1/4 slider.

Poke me after.