Bearsome wrote:

Hi, here from my queue

Nostalgia

07:51:106 (1,2) - I'd try incorporating the pattern from the original map - it fits the song better than those two sliders. this is one of the few places where i didnt follow the original gimick of maps because they dont suit in anyway imo.

Also, the matter with such maps is that usually you don't want to make them too hard - it's hard enough that they're long, once they're over 7,50* is when you should at least consider turning the difficulty down a bit. I got some parts that I think could be 'watered down' in my opinion:

08:30:106 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) (way too big jumps for such high bpm; I know it's from Tengaku, but the bpm there is also lower. Here it's 240bpm)

09:54:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) (I highly doubt much people would be able to get through this part - I'd throw in a kickslider or two somewhere here; that's still higher bpm than the original)

09:54:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same as above

09:59:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - too

Overall, I love how you kept the spirit of the maps based on SakiZ's mashups - keeping the original style, not being afraid of introducing distinct mapping styles right next to each other. I believe those changes aren't just "silencing" what you're trying to say with the map, but I do believe at some points it's taken a bit too far, considering how much faster the mashup is, comparing to the original. Thanks for pointing this out but the thing is we want to keep the original gimmicks executed in best way as we can thats why atleast i wont nerf any part of 240 bpm songs. Theres a 3 seconds break before 240 bpm part where players can pause and regain stamina. Also keeping this hard is what makes it more fun and challenging and thats what i want

-Tatsuo wrote:

hi, random mod (2nd page hype)

01:32:413 (1) - the whole song has no squares D: D:

04:14:413 (1) - CTRL+J for better flow? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7892216 yes

09:25:106 (1,2) - make these circles ye i know monstrata used circles in original map but i want to keep those sliders for aesthetics purposes lol

10:26:195 (1,2,3) - you could still map some circles here (pretty loud sounds) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7892445 will think about it

good luck with the map! i hope it will be ranked

[Jenn] wrote:

from q, sorry for such a crappy mod, im not used to modding such fast maps

• Nostalgia

1. 00:27:613 (1) - imo i think curved slider would look better than s, or maybe deepen the s to make it match the previous sliders a little more ( the ones after the slider, they seem a little odd out) current one fits fine
2. 03:50:863 (7,8,1,2,3) -nerf the tip of stream a little maybe? it looks a bit weird and is sharper than the ones before as well (however, i see it does help transition into the next part so yeah xp) ye i would rather keep this since the song totally changes here
3. 04:19:813 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - why straight? should be "round" like others, the song doesnt change and in just repeating the previous part i have done round in almost all previous streams so yea kinda wanted to have some variation so that the gameplay wont be that much boring lol
4. 05:02:413 (1,2) - these could have a red joint in the middle to match the formation of the circles, go for a little bit square like so the circles arent really odd out sure

1. 00:38:413 (1) - Maybe split this into circle + 3/4 slider to highlight the pitch change in instrument at 00:38:563 I think it will have a nice feel.
2. 00:39:163 (1,1) - In terms of flow and aesthetics, I think it could be better if you had a jump such that the first slider flows more directly into the second slider, and with their bodies further apart.
3. 01:15:163 (5) - Maybe start a new combo here to highlight the visual pattern.
4. 01:21:763 (2,3) - Curves could be matched better.
5. 01:30:613 (5,6,7,8) - Doesn't really seem like the best jump pattern to lead into the next pattern, and it looks kinda messy and hard to read. I think it would look better and perhaps flow into the next part better if you placed (7) at the left and (8) at the right: http://puu.sh/vwUUZ/63a44e52ac.jpg This would lead up to the side-to-side motion better.
6. 01:53:113 (1,2,3) - More complex slider shapes would show off these heavy electronic sounds better.
7. 01:55:663 (1) - This new combo is not necessary. It just adds confusion.
8. 02:00:013 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Consider comboing pairs of circles to make it more readable, especially since the second group of four circles has different placement than the first.
9. 02:02:413 (1,2,3,4) - This kind of change in distance doesn't seem reasonable to me. It's really uncomfortable to have to change speed suddenly while moving in a straight line like that. How about not stacking them, and doing something like this instead? http://puu.sh/vwVln/4fa66d50eb.jpg
10. 02:06:013 (1) - New combo is not necessary here.
11. 02:39:013 (6,1,2,3,1) - Why ignore the all the 1/4 beat drums here? The 1/2 beats are not really important here. It would make much more sense to either map all the 1/4 beats for drums, or only 1/1 for vocals.
12. 02:44:413 (1) - Slider shape would be prettier without the bump at the 3rd node. Try to make the second segment connect smoothly into the curve?
13. 02:51:613 - Feels very weak to have the end of this repeat slider on the downbeat. Strongly recommend starting the stream at this beat.
14. 03:03:313 (3,4,1) - These large jumps are unsuitable for this part of the music imo. Just keep the spacing the same as previous ones.
15. 03:08:488 (1) - Would make sense to end this spinner 1/2 beat earlier to coincide with pitch change.
16. 03:28:963 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Pattern is kind of backward here. Emphasis should be on the white tick sliders, so it should be group as such: http://puu.sh/vwVQh/a8b9526445.jpg
17. 03:53:338 (3,4,5) - Very awkward rhythm. The rhythm you chose de-emphasizes the note at 03:53:488 which feels really weird, considering that this note is strong in the music. It would be better to start a slider at this spot. Same for similar parts like 03:54:688 and 03:55:888 and 03:58:288 and 03:59:488 etc.
18. 03:56:863 (4,5,6,7) - Why did you choose to do this? Sliders similar to previous patterns would be more suitable.
19. 04:21:613 - Ahhhhhh whoever created this track shifted Mythologia's End by half a beat, and it just makes it feel like a completely different song lol.
20. 05:00:763 (8,9) - Could flow nicer if you swapped the positions to get round flow and a jump into (1).
21. 05:20:113 (5,6,1) - This is quite uncomfortable to play because of the jump distances and angle. I recommend making (6,1) larger distance and tighter angle than (5,6).
22. 05:21:313 (5,6,1) - Same as 05:20:113 (5,6,1)
23. 05:28:213 (1) - Is this new combo really needed? Nothing in the stream changes. If anything, try changing the rhythm/pattern for this second half to contrast between the songs and give a better transition.
24. 05:40:813 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I don't think this is appropriate. It's way too sudden a change to the pacing of the map, and is extremely messy and hard to read. I would recommend sticking to the main beats. At least make a more organized pattern and lower slider velocity.
25. 05:47:713 (4) - Better to have this one unstacked as the only circle at the corner of the stream imo. It makes that note stronger in the map: http://puu.sh/vwXaj/288dc826ac.jpg
26. 06:01:813 (3) - Would be nice to use a circle here to show the stop/start feel in the song imo.
27. 06:03:163 (7,8) - Random jump.. these should really be spaced closer since there's nothing important to jump to at (8).
28. 06:03:763 (10,1) - Spacing here is confusing.
29. 06:12:313 (2,3,2,3) - The close distance spacing between (2,3) don't really make sense, since (3) is stronger than (2).
30. 06:18:013 (1) - New combo is not necessary here. It just breaks the visual pattern.
31. 06:20:113 (4,5) - Recommend stack to avoid confusing it with 1/4 beat.

1. 00:53:413 (4) - unstack this for godlike emphasis i hate this song
2. 01:15:163 (5) - combo for pattern cause it looks kinda messy atm
3. 01:21:763 (2,3) - match them curves better yo
4. 01:30:013 (1) - this whole jump thing looks pretty messy right now
5. 01:33:613 (1,2) - swap nc's for emphasis, same 01:36:013 (1,2) -
6. 01:51:613 (1) - PLAGIARISM REPORTED
7. 01:55:813 (1) - could make this 2 sliders for the hold sound at the sliderned
8. 02:02:563 (2,3) - speeding up while moving in a straight line is kinda awkward tbh
9. 02:03:613 (3) - think you could add an NC here like you did at 02:06:013 (1) - for dat sweet emphasis
10. 02:39:613 (1) - think mapping the 1/4's here would make more sense than the 1/2 w/e sounds
11. 03:03:013 (1,2,3,4) - ew large jumps in a calm part
12. 03:28:963 (1) - think normal stream would've handled this guitar thing better and you wouldn't have to worry about that emphasis cause now it's on the red tick lmao
13. 03:30:463 (2) - sweet pentagram you got there 666
14. 03:32:413 (1) - srsly this is so confusing. I have no idea what you're mapping and then you suddenly map the 1/4 at 03:36:013 (1) - from that touhou song and then go back to 1/1 sliders and i'm just like confused what. TL:DR i think you should be more clear what song you're mapping
15. 03:56:413 (1) - tbh i think circles kill all the "hype" these type of songs have lmao
16. 04:21:613 (1) - what even is this song lmao... think mythologia's end has that sweet syncopation and the track here is kinda idk... fucked?
17. 05:00:613 (7,8,9) - this flow feels really awkward. ctrl+g would do the trick pretty nicely and then you get 05:01:063 (1) - emphasized as well
18. 05:27:613 (7) - nc this and then you can remove the nc from 05:28:213 (1) - cause it literally does nothing
19. 05:47:713 (4) - this being stacked under 05:47:613 (3) - kinda kills the emphasis for that white tick

Little wrote:

1. 00:38:413 (1) - Maybe split this into circle + 3/4 slider to highlight the pitch change in instrument at 00:38:563 I think it will have a nice feel.The song is still pretty calm here even tho theres a pitch change, the slider suits fine
2. 00:39:163 (1,1) - In terms of flow and aesthetics, I think it could be better if you had a jump such that the first slider flows more directly into the second slider, and with their bodies further apart. I think the transition is still nice, the flow from first to second slider is good enough to give it proper emphasis, also i like these aesthetics so gonna keep
3. 02:39:013 (6,1,2,3,1) - Why ignore the all the 1/4 beat drums here? The 1/2 beats are not really important here. It would make much more sense to either map all the 1/4 beats for drums, or only 1/1 for vocals. i m still trying to emphasize the vocals of nippon song here because as in the original map the mapper tries to emphasize the vocals with high spaced square jumps, the 1/4 drums are for reol song and thats not what i tried to follow here
4. 03:53:338 (3,4,5) - Very awkward rhythm. The rhythm you chose de-emphasizes the note at 03:53:488 which feels really weird, considering that this note is strong in the music. It would be better to start a slider at this spot. Same for similar parts like 03:54:688 and 03:55:888 and 03:58:288 and 03:59:488 etc. the rhythm sounds fine to me since all the important sounds are supported by 03:53:338 (3,4,5) - properly and if you refer to the original map, rrtyui used the same rhythm
5. 03:56:863 (4,5,6,7) - Why did you choose to do this? Sliders similar to previous patterns would be more suitable.uh nope, the song is obviously different here
6. 04:21:613 - Ahhhhhh whoever created this track shifted Mythologia's End by half a beat, and it just makes it feel like a completely different song lol. um what
7. 05:00:763 (8,9) - Could flow nicer if you swapped the positions to get round flow and a jump into (1). nice, fixed

Maakkeli wrote:

hi!

1. 01:33:613 (1,2) - swap nc's for emphasis, same 01:36:013 (1,2) - keep because i nc after downbeat or half downbeat
2. 03:32:413 (1) - srsly this is so confusing. I have no idea what you're mapping and then you suddenly map the 1/4 at 03:36:013 (1) - from that touhou song and then go back to 1/1 sliders and i'm just like confused what. TL:DR i think you should be more clear what song you're mapping ko let me explain, since there are 2 songs at the same time playing. i followed both equally and by that i mean i mapped first downbeat for the weeb song and second for touhou song third for weeb and so on
3. 03:56:413 (1) - tbh i think circles kill all the "hype" these type of songs have lmao no the Synth go much calm here thats why small spacing
4. 04:21:613 (1) - what even is this song lmao... think mythologia's end has that sweet syncopation and the track here is kinda idk... fucked? mayb it is
5. 05:00:613 (7,8,9) - this flow feels really awkward. ctrl+g would do the trick pretty nicely and then you get 05:01:063 (1) - emphasized as well did from previous mod

kms

1. 01:09:613 (1) - splitting this to something 1/2 + circle would better for vocal rhythm since you used to follow them on 00:55:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 01:04:813 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - etc
2. 01:45:613 (5,1) - swap NC
3. 02:43:813 (7,8) - kicks would delivers better for 1/4 synth i guess
4. 04:40:513 (7,8,9,10) - buff the spacing here wouldn't hurt tbh
5. 05:02:113 (6,7) - it would be cool if you moved to left side instead for alternating jumps with 05:01:513 (2,3,4,5) -
6. 05:28:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - vs 05:18:613 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - song is different but might consider to make em consistent
7. 06:10:513 (3) - this is the only clap thingy goes too weak compared to 06:09:913 (3) - 06:11:113 (3) - 06:11:713 (3) - so ye maybe can be moved somewhere further away from 06:10:363 (2) -
8. 06:23:713 (7) - isn't should be stacked on 06:23:413 (5) - ?
9. 06:26:713 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,1,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1) - lol evil
10. 07:17:113 (5,6,7,8) - buff spacing a bit? you can just move 07:16:813 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - rightward to stack 07:16:213 (4,1) - again so it's not that hard to add some spice on this part
11. 07:38:606 (3,5,7) - add NC, or remove NC on 07:36:606 (1,1,1) - if you wanted to change the style for variation as new sound comes in 07:36:106 -
12. 08:28:105 (5) - new combo should be here regardless of your aesthetics, also maybe change the slider instead than to repeat 08:27:106 (1,2,3,4) - all over again
13. 08:44:106 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - and 08:52:106 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - these parts looks rly basic compared to other 240bpm parts (remote control and tengaku) maybe try to make em harder as it's already hell diff
14. 09:31:856 (1,2,3) - y u slide them while you placed like something getting intense from 09:29:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - pls add mor circles as new vocal phrase starts on 09:32:606 - so u still have a time 2 jump here and there

Akitoshi wrote:

1. 01:45:613 (5,1) - swap NC yes
2. 04:40:513 (7,8,9,10) - buff the spacing here wouldn't hurt tbh current spacing is fine i guess nothings wrong with it
3. 05:02:113 (6,7) - it would be cool if you moved to left side instead for alternating jumps with 05:01:513 (2,3,4,5) - i prefer current one a
4. 05:28:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - vs 05:18:613 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - song is different but might consider to make em consistent its ok for it to be inconsistent because one of them is my part and other is deppy's
5. 06:10:513 (3) - this is the only clap thingy goes too weak compared to 06:09:913 (3) - 06:11:113 (3) - 06:11:713 (3) - so ye maybe can be moved somewhere further away from 06:10:363 (2) -
6. 07:38:606 (3,5,7) - add NC, or remove NC on 07:36:606 (1,1,1) - if you wanted to change the style for variation as new sound comes in 07:36:106 - Fixed
7. 09:31:856 (1,2,3) - y u slide them while you placed like something getting intense from 09:29:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - pls add mor circles as new vocal phrase starts on 09:32:606 - so u still have a time 2 jump here and there as you know we followed the concepts from original maps and the way i made it here is how its done in the map by monstrata

im nub at modding a diff that i cant even pass lol my bad actually modding in general u said cool earlier
gl

Pachiru wrote:

hola

i like the reference to hw on tsubaki and helix

[nostalgia]

*00:20:413 (1) - all this part in the begining is very undermapped, i think it's your choice, i just think that's weird to have a good song like this undermapped who can be mapped slowly and easily without undermapping it (if its your choice, then i respect it) a yea its intentional

*01:44:113 (1,2,3,4) - why this stream is not like this one: 01:48:913 (1,2,3,4) - ? since they share the same sound, i prefer the second one tbh well if you look in the real map, fanzhen did things the way i did here so ya.

*03:56:413 (1,2,3) - this pattern looks strange here cause during all the camellia song, the map is made with some jumps, and this time, there is 3 notes not spaced (the one i highlighted) on a place where it shouldnt be less spaced like this imo, since it's not a calm part, i don't get why those 3 notes are like this, if you have an explanation ? (tl;dr : space more those 3 notes) i increased spacing a bit but not that much since thats how its done in the original map

i guess that's all, the original song maps' are very well remake, wish this map will be ranked soon tm, the map is a pure masterpiece, that will be my last word i think.

Pachiru wrote:

hola

i like the reference to hw on tsubaki and helix

[nostalgia]

*00:52:663 (1,2,3,4,5) - the angle here looks quite sharp, its quite original, but i think it might be hard to play, compared to the rest of the part. if you could try to make this slider 00:53:713 (5) - curved or sth, that would be good i guess, just an opinion tho (you use some sharp pattern later in the map, but those use less chain sharp angle imo) eh it loosk fine to me might change later if more ppl mention

*02:51:763 (1,2,3,4,5) - i think this stream space is quite op compared to the previous one, maybe reducing a bit the spacing, to make it more accessible for players that can't spaced stream (even if it's not a hard spaced stream) i think this emphasizes the different between instrument and the hihats before pretty well

*03:29:113 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - those slider would sounds better if it was a circle stream instead, because in my opinion, all the guitar sounds should be clickable, its my pov (for instance, i think slider stream works a way better here: 04:10:813 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - like you did) na i try to do wat fycho did

* 05:19:213 (1) - from this point, and during all the fourfolium song, i think the jumps are very spaced, compared to the other songs in this compilation (from what i'm seeing actually, it means that i didn't watched already the rest of the map (edit: forget this if you don't want) e) and maybe the gap between those other other songs and this one can be quite hard, i think increasing step by step the difficulty would be good, even if i know that's hard to make something balanced on a compilation of song. i'm maybe wrong tho there is 1 fourfolium song and yes i love doormat so i want to emphasize more lool

*05:40:813 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - this look quite messy here, why not rearranging this to make something more easy to read? i think that could be better. na follow hw

*06:32:713 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - try to make them less spaced, to still keep a collumn style, but without cause troubles to the player while playing this, i like the way you made it, but i think that would be better if they would be less spaced. na following hw also if i dont space those i dont think it fits with nearby patterns (also that doesnt look like hw!

FiddleBlue wrote:

General

1. Might want to add a storyboard to let people know what songs are playing. Not all players recognize every song. think hokichi is doing that

Extra
[notice]

1. 02:51:763 (1,2,3,4,5) - Isn't this a bit too much for 200bpm? na not rly
2. 03:17:263 (2,3,4,2) - Perhaps overlap these. no idk how is that better
3. 05:22:063 (2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's better if the spacing here is reduced to emphasize 05:22:813 (1,2,3,4) - more as the vocals are stronger there and the current one is hardly different on both. eh na i looked into doormats map while making this and i think this is closer to wat he did than emphasizing the 2nd combo more, he did some similar spacing like t his
4. 05:33:313 (2,3) - Perhaps make these to not overlap. No reason, I just think it looks better. You can ignore this. no mainly cuz mine still looks fine
5. 05:34:363 (6,1) - ^
6. 05:36:913 (7,1,2,3,4,1) - I think it's better if the circle overlap with 05:37:213 (1) - instead of 05:37:438 (4) - . It expresses the overlapping more than the circle looking as if it's cramped between the stream. what?
7. 05:40:813 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Kinda overmapped since there's no sound on the blue tick. And the way it's mapped is hinting a change in intensity due to the gradually increasing spacing, but I find it the same as the rest of the song except for on this part 05:40:813 (1,2,1,2,1) - where the vocal is different. Consider making a new approach to this, and perhaps differentiate the intensity. there is faint 1/4 instrument glissando ish sound
8. 05:44:113 (4,5) - This 1/4 may be too far. nope! ppl mostly ignore sliderpaths anyway (also mimicking hw
9. 06:01:963 - A circle here to emphasize the vocal perhaps. added
10. 06:31:513 (1,2,1,2) - Why changed to a straight movement rather than a very fast sharp turn 06:27:313 (1,2,1,2) - ? idk i just feel like it LOL and it still fits with the same concept of space it every 2 notes
11. 06:54:613 (1,3) - Perhaps overlap these. i think u mean stack but sure
12. 07:09:913 (1,1,1,1) - These 1/8 sliders are supposed to be 1/4. 1/8 just sounds not appropriate and kinda irritating. eh its right cuz drums are on 1/8
13. 07:11:713 (1,2) - The gap between these is 1/8. Make it to 1/4 so that players will have more time to react and tap as 1/8 gap may cause players to lose combo. redo
14. 07:23:563 (2,3) - I know it's an intense part, but isn't this a bit too far for a 1/4 jump? na the original map even did space much more than this so i have to space this a bit so it kinda looks a little like dat
15. 08:31:231 (2,4,2,4) - Why are the one above continue expanding while these repeats? I think it's better if they continue to expand as well as it's odd for it not to when the one above does. ya dont have enough space below the playfield sry

• 
  Nostalgia

1. 01:30:613 (5,6) - Ctrl+G is better
   01:30:013 (1,2,3) - 01:30:463 (4,5,6) - and should be in the same flow
2. 01:50:113 (1,2,3,4,1) - The image looks more beautiful
   
   img

   
3. 02:12:913 (5) - Ctrl+G is better. I think that it is better to make it in the same direction
   02:12:613 (3,4,1,2) - Circles with similar feeling are moving upwards
4. 03:56:863 (4,5,6,7) - I think that it is okay to let go of the interval a little more
5. 04:33:013 (2,3) - Ctrl+G is better
   01:30:613 (5,6) - For the same reason
6. 06:02:713 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 06:03:913 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Why not make the flow the same?
7. 06:26:713 (1,1,1,1) - Make the distance the same
8. 06:54:613 (1,3) - I think I can stack

FiddleBlue wrote:

Hi from queue.
I like how the mapping style of the original is somewhat applied.

General

1. Might want to add a storyboard to let people know what songs are playing. Not all players recognize every song. what deppy said

Extra

1. 00:24:013 (2,2) - I don't think these really emphasize anything. The first one has a strong piano sound unlike these two. How about making this section to follow the vocal more until 00:27:613 (1) - . since its the intro , i wanted the rhythm to be simple, i m following the really really faint hi hats
2. 00:30:013 (1,2) - The slider ends don't overlap properly, and this applies to the one after. If it's intended, you can ignore this. osu bug,
   fix
3. 02:32:113 (7) - I think these are better being two circles as there's vocal on both tick. It's similar 02:32:713 (2,3,4) - , so I think they should be the same.The first one has slider cuz the vocal at red tik is almost inaudible, it sounds like a continued vocal from the white tick. The other pattern u linked has much different vocals lol
4. 02:33:463 (6,3) - Perhaps overlap these for aesthetics. its intentional
5. 02:38:863 (4,5,6) - How about instead of the last circle of this triple to be the one finishing the quadrilateral, the first circle is the one to do that. Right now the "square" isn't really a square since using follow points make 02:38:413 (1,2) - and 02:38:713 (3,4,5,6) - not parallel. So by adjusting the placement of the triple, it can be a square created by 02:38:413 (1,2,3,4) - instead of 02:38:413 (1,2,3,6) - . Hopefully, you understand. xd yeah i understand but its seriously not even worth fixing this, the square was made perfectly but the stack kinda changed its position, those who have stacking turned off will complain about it later if i do what u said now
6. 05:04:813 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe a 1/4 slider instead of simplifying them? nop as u can see all songs here are following the gimicks of original map and this is how these vocals are executed in the real map of this song
7. 05:22:063 (2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's better if the spacing here is reduced to emphasize 05:22:813 (1,2,3,4) - more as the vocals are stronger there and the current one is hardly different on both.
8. 06:36:013 (1) - Slider is just too generic. Try to use harder slider body to follow and perhaps a couple of sharp edges as what most of the sliders in HW's version use. no one thought of it as "too" generic. its different than every other slider shape used in the whole map so its fine since its unique here, but if this point is pointed out again.i m gonna fix it
9. 08:23:356 (2) - I think this being a 1/4 slider and a circle suit better as the red tick is also strong with the vocal. that doesnt sound totally right, the main instrument that is being followed is the vocal instrument, even tho doing what u said makes somewhat sense but it will be a bit overdone since the songs pitch is lowering.
10. 09:26:606 (1,2,3) - Just a suggestion, but why not make these as a triangle with the heads and tails overlapping one another? i did what monstrata did in his map also i like this pattern a lot more, a triangle was already done in zen zen so its also fine not repeating it here again.

Good luck!

Yasaija 714 wrote:

m4m

• 
  Nostalgia

1. 01:50:113 (1,2,3,4,1) - The image looks more beautiful fixed i guess
   
   img

   
2. 03:56:863 (4,5,6,7) - I think that it is okay to let go of the interval a little more yea
3. 04:33:013 (2,3) - Ctrl+G is better i prefer mine actually since the pattern currently has an angle that feels more convenient to play
4. 06:54:613 (1,3) - I think I can stack fixed

Your map is very beautiful!
I hope to make it useful for you as much as I can

Good luck!