Sinnoh wrote:

this is nice
i'd turn of skin whenever playing because the colours are too dark for me, could increase brightness for more people to play with colours i think it's kinda okay, not too dark for me xd
00:17:027 (1) - Lack of hitsound imo, should use whistle as well because keysound isn’t enough here wtf when did i changed this?

Insane
01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - This actually flowed really well, you could potentially use it on the other diffs too since it’s something memorable xd
01:35:637 (1) - Bit of a combo breaker due to high spacing + SV Really? I think it's not a problem. but i fixed the spacing

Light Extra
this is the diff that I would normally play, more things about distances here
00:17:027 (1) - Just position this a little closer, clicked too late i think that's okay, but i may try to move (2) a little bit closer
00:27:574 (2) - this flows better if moved a bit to the right, bit too far in the corner i'll try
00:32:074 (2,3) - flow from 2 to 3 would be slightly better if 3 was moved up, so that it lines up better. could move 2 down or other things instead well, i tried to move (2) instead since i can't move (3) cuz it'll affect to DS
01:09:762 (3,4,1) - could probably make a better triangle with these I didn't intend to make a triangle here. I tried to make (3)'s slider blanket with (1)
01:15:762 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow too well here, angle is really wide. minor improvement but could ctrl-j 1, better visual flow with next pattern not look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1,1) - flow is really killed here, here's a silly fix, try it maybe https://puu.sh/vgo9c/ac84b469b9.png (although kinda silly) I intead make something similiar to this.
01:18:949 (4,1) - this jump should not be this big, no sound on it idk where should i put here ;;
01:20:262 (1,1) - Hard to read because the head of the slider here is hiding behind 01:20:074 (2) - , I thin it's not a big problem and i think it's playable, but i'll stack (1)'s slider-tail to (1).
01:22:324 (6) - I get that it's an important part to emphasise, but it might be too jumpy in this general area. 6 would be a lot better if it was closer to the stream k
01:29:074 (2,1) - can you make this jump a bit smaller I'm afraid i can't (no explain sry cuz hard to explain)
01:29:449 (2) - drawing from pishi's newest video, this one has a clear kick on both head and tail, should make a triple for music imo leave it as a slider-kick also okay too
01:40:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - should be a little closer since not as intense imo, but opinion I think it's kinda near xd
02:16:512 (1) - this section DS increases compared to the previous?? should really change K

ExtraLiberation
00:01:512 (1) - Slider head/reverse/tail don’t really make sense, higher pitched violins should be clickable here. 1/1 sliders would suit more. There’s potential gimmicks you could play with SV here too if you did it, low sv on 00:01:512 (1) - and higher on 00:02:262 (2) - would match pitch changes well K
00:17:027 (3) - Could potentially do this since it’s the top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I think i'll make somethink as boat's diff does.
00:48:387 (2,3) - would be better if you ctrl-g for spacing emphasis + would make flow angles on 2 and 3 the same (they’re different angle = different emphasis right now) but you don’t the snare too often so idk idk this looks bad for me and i wanna keep ds here too so. .-.
01:19:324 (4,1) - doesn’t flow too well, even for emphasis. 1 should at least be a little more to the right of the head of 1 holy. i'll make a new one now ;w;
01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
01:22:137 (5,1,1) - Really breaks circular flow here, the stream should be going clockwise to follow flow POTASSIUM K
01:22:793 (4,1) - Could add more emphasis here no. i thin it's all the same so it don't need to emphasize imo.

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Lost's Light Insane:

collapsed text

00:45:012 (4) - move a bit up so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:02:262 (3,4) - Think it'll be better if you make these a mirror of 01:00:762 (3,4), it follows the pattern afterwards too i don't think so
01:53:637 (3) - slightly down so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:59:637 (3,4) - ^ fixed

Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked.

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Not gonna lie, this is a great mapset and tbh I can't find much to work with as there's like 30secs of it being intensive with the rest being really straightforward and like 2* in difficulty lol, just a few overlaps that bothered me for the most part. So all of these are just suggestions as I haven't found anything 'wrong' with any of the difficulties really...
So if you feel I'm nitpicking, that's because the map is just this good.

Liberation:

collapsed text

01:24:574 (5) - could move this somewhere else, feels too close to the triple
01:40:887 (3) - either stack it with reverse slider or move 01:40:887 (3) - a bit to the left so the overlaps are the same instead moving (5) to stack with (3)
01:53:637 (3,4) and 02:11:262 (3,5) - I don't think these overlaps are necessary. imo they look nice & i keep ds.

Light Extra:

collapsed text

00:20:637 (4,1) - I don't think overlaps like this look good, especially when you do a different kind of overlap here 00:25:137 (4,1) . They didn't overlap each other. Just slightly but not overlap
00:51:762 (3,1) - Space them a bit so they don't overlap, the vocals get a bit more intensive here as well so it won't screw your emphasis.
01:04:137 (3,1) - Stuff like this, you're only using it here from what I can see, unless all these weird overlaps are your motif for this map, I'd recommend getting rid of them. Up to you~ they look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1) - another one ^
01:39:574 (4) - I'd move it to x:228 y24 so the follow points go right through 01:39:012 (1) 's center.
01:57:012 (3) - move to x:28 y:326 so overlaps are the same on all 3 sliders keep ds here

Insane:

collapsed text

02:08:262 (2,5) - make these overlaps the same, and that's pretty much it... can't find anything in this diff

Normal:

collapsed text

00:34:605 (1) - I think extending this spinner to 00:36:762 works better maybe?
01:41:262 (5) - maybe place another reverse slider starting on red here instead so it follows the music better? 01:41:449 isn't very intense here so i think it's bad idea

Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked. Thanks!

Sinnoh wrote:

@boatkrab what I meant, same ds but different rhythm
https://puu.sh/vgzab/e25a70bb96.png

Wanko wrote:

BoatKrab's Insane:

collapsed text

00:21:762 (3,4,1,2) & 00:28:512 (1,2) - Make these overlaps the same tell me why... .-.
00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like this part, would go with something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7805426 , it's a more natural jump imo I fixed on my own :3
01:21:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Make it smoother maybe?
01:57:012 (3) - I'd go with a bit more curved slider here. but I wouldn't ;w;
02:17:074 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NCs like here 02:19:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) I can't do it, if it be 02:17:262 (2) - must be start a new nc and 02:17:074 (1) - will be only 1 on combos without a reason ;w;

Pappy wrote:

I'd suggest moving ft. Guriri to title instead of artist as in official video.Also 구리리 is Guriri's korean name so you can ad it to non-romanised.
reference
This is the only official metadata source rn so you'd better stick to this.

Also since i see you like adding a lot of tags, you can add korean, all of the artists are from there, arent they

wish i could mod but can't really help, sorry. Good luck on the map buddy

1. I will add guriri in the title!
2. but i think it's okay to not put her korean name into title cuz i see no map add that korean name (e.g https://osu.ppy.sh/s/128645) <, i know it's an old map xd. i will put that name into tags instead and i will also add her japanese name too

Deppyforce wrote:

this is pretty good
and i dont say that to anyone often THX

[g]
02:25:699 - theres glissando try end spinner here sounds more fitting k
this seems like last goodbye farewell type song more than liberating so idk if u wanna change diff name here the reason why i name this diff like this cuz "2. ดอก Marigold หรือดอกดาวเรืองนั้น มีความหมายถึงความสิ้นหวังและความเศร้าโศกอันเนื่องมาจากการสูญเสียความรักไป". so i name it like this xd

[sb]
check ur lyrics in some certain places idk where u copied this from but i got it from this official vid
01:11:824 - it doesnt have 'be' in song
02:07:512 - this says 'i love you too always deeply'
02:16:512 - this doesnt have 'i will '

[liberation]
01:22:324 (1) - remove nc k
02:02:074 - why is there a random green line here lol idk boat did it xd

[light ex]
00:46:137 (4,1) - nazi blanket 1s end get too close sorry
00:54:012 (1,2) - edit this part a bit and try to avoid this overlap http://puu.sh/viYuU/058b5893f2.jpg i instead moving (3) away
01:41:637 (1,2) - can u make it easier by place it over slidertails location instead of the head cuz its weaker sound http://puu.sh/viYDH/ef7953bc78.jpg k
02:09:387 (1) - literally no sound k

gl

Deppyforce wrote:

dam i woulda wanted to gd extra for this
and i dont say dat often also IF YOU CAN MAKE SOMEKIND OF 5.1* THEN YOU GO!!!!!

Deppyforce wrote:

[เรือ in]

อ็อบเจ็ค ฟิกซ์
00:44:168 - could map 1/4 for dat flute thing I didn't follow the flute for the first
01:15:012 (1) - pls dont do this, fucing r u i n e d especially with this stack leniency http://puu.sh/viYWq/745991765a.jpg
01:24:668 - no piano here atleast change previous note to kickslider or smh to follow it properly มันขาดตอน ถถถถ ;-;

gl

• 
  [General]
  

1. Might want to silence the soft-sliderslide, kind of disrupts the calm in some parts of the song, for example 00:13:512 - . Here, take this 44 byte blank wav.
2. Might want to raise the HP of boatkrab's insane to fit the settings of adjacent difficulties.
3. The snapping of 00:16:012 - is 1/12 in some diffs and 1/16 in others, try keeping these the same. Personally I think 1/16 sounds more accurate, but better to check with others as well.
   
   [Normal]
4. 00:45:012 (3) - Try moving the red anchor to the slidertick to reflect the sound at 00:45:387 - , like 00:39:012 (3) - does.
5. 00:59:262 - This SV change doesn't do anything atm, but I'm pretty sure newer modders may catch on to it and think it's a problem, so consider removing it.
6. 01:53:449 - This density is a bit high for being such a calm section. Especially in comparison to the others. Try replacing that rhythm with a circle instead, to lower the density. Take a look at 01:59:637 - , for example.
7. 02:02:262 (2) - 00:47:262 (5) - If possible I would've liked for distinct sounds like these to stand out by having both impacts be circles, rather than being a slider like the rest. Although, it might be beyond the scope of rhythmical density intended for the difficulty. Even so, there is headroom available in terms of SR.
8. 02:19:512 (1,2,3,1) - Instead of continuing this slider train, I would have notably reduced SV here, along with density. Could try something like this for rhythm.
   
   [KittyAdventure's Advanced]
9. 00:01:512 - Some conflicting custom sample settings here, unify them to avoid technical issues in the map.
10. 00:03:574 - This rhythm feels a bit too dense for being the intro, and this is actually more intense than how the Hard is mapped here. The constant use of circles in between sliders becomes slightly repetitive, especially when used consecutively like this. The contrast between 00:10:512 - and 00:13:512 - is kind of lacking, as well. Because of the repeating pattern of 1/1s and circles, two 1/2s like 00:15:012 (5,6) - also becomes a bit unexpected. This is a lot of things for one section, so would suggest you rework this. Try lowering the overall density a bit to bring more contrast between this part and 00:19:512 - .
11. 00:21:949 (2) - This impact happens at 00:22:043 - , and not the red tick. Would start a slider from 00:21:762 - , where a prominent snare exists and a click would be more predictable instead. Additionally, would turn 00:22:137 - into a 1/2 slider or circle with 1/1 gap, as 00:22:324 - isn't very strong.
12. 00:22:512 - is also pretty much the same as 00:21:762 - 00:28:512 - etc, but with a different pitch, so would make if rhythm was somewhat similar.
13. 00:25:324 - Preferably the circles right before prominent sounds should be placed differently than others, for the sake of making it stand out properly. In this case 00:26:074 (2,3) - is pretty much arranged in the same way 00:25:324 (3,1) - is. Could otherwise stack 00:25:324 (3) - on 00:25:512 (1) - . There's another case at 01:05:824 (6) - , where things are both stacked and unstacked at times, so would change the rhythm, sort of like 01:11:262 (3,4) - 01:08:262 (3,4) - were done.
14. 00:28:512 (1,2) - For sliders, there's usually a general rule of thumb that white ticks take priority over red ticks, and red over blue, etc, unless the song suggests otherwise. So swapping these rhythmically would make it seem more natural to play, especially since 00:28:512 - is stronger in this case, and 00:28:699 - weaker than 00:28:887 - .
15. 00:33:012 - This is where density should decrease, but it seems to continue like it did before, which kind of fails to express what the song is doing here. I realize 00:33:762 - is a rhythm technique to switch instrumental layer, but it's usually discouraged in calmer sections, as it requires the player to focus more, which again, goes against how the song sounds here. Could instead try something like this.
16. 00:44:074 (2) - Here, 00:44:074 - is weaker than 00:44:262 - . I realize you're following the flute, but the flute is no longer heard at 00:44:262 - , where another instrument starts. This leads to players expecting it to be clickable, hence why it feels awkward in gameplay. Would try this instead, where vocals are also prioritized.
17. 00:57:762 - Two distinct impacts, so would try two circles, where the second could be stacked over 00:58:512 (1) - , to emphasize the transition. Applies to 02:02:262 (3) - as well.
18. 01:35:262 (4,5) - Could swap these rhythmically to emphasize 01:35:637 - 01:35:824 - , as the current is the same way 01:33:762 (3,4,1,2) - are done, for instance, which wouldn't be good contrast.
19. 01:41:637 - It's important that rhythm density correlates to the intensity of the song. Having things like 01:42:199 (2,3,4,5,1) - , may fit the individual sounds, but it doesn't fit the song at the time when comparing this section to others. Could try making use of some SV changes as well to make lower density sections feel slower.
20. 01:43:512 - This part is a break in all other difficulties. Are you sure you don't want any breaks in the map? It is still around 2:30 in length.
21. 01:58:512 (1) - Refrain from cramping sliders this much, this looks really bad lol
22. 02:16:512 - This starts off well, but the density quickly starts spiraling into 02:18:012 (1,2,3,4) - and some really dense stuff like 02:20:262 (3,4,5,6) - . Would highly suggest you reconsider parts like these.
    
    Calm parts may need some work, some sliders start on weaker sounds than they end or roll over etc. There's some things to look into here, although it is relatively new so I suppose it's to be expected.
    
    [Hard]
23. Going to ignore the gap here since we're waiting for kittyadventure's adv. aand it's here
24. 00:21:762 (7,8) - 00:22:512 (1,2) - Having two different ways to indicate 1/4 may get slightly confusing. These are also the same sounds so having both the same would make sense. Same would apply to 00:28:512 (1,2) - , depending on what you do.
25. 00:35:262 (5,6) - This would work better if they were rhythmically swapped. Generally priority will go white > red > blue etc, unless the song suggests otherwise, meaning 00:35:262 - would be the start of the slider, and 00:35:637 - would be the circle. This way you'll also rhythmically emphasize 00:35:824 - through contrast.
26. 00:44:449 - These sliderends felt kind of awkward after previously clicking on the same sound, 00:38:449 - , additionally, 00:44:262 - might want to be covered. In it's current state, this will probably cause players to lift too early. Slider is just a bit too long, and you'd expect to click on the beginning of a new stanza.
27. 00:47:262 (6) - Could replace this with two circles instead to give contrast from 00:46:512 (5) - , in order to reflect the more prominent sounds here, similarly to what was suggested in Normal. Would also apply to 02:02:262 (2) - .
28. 01:20:262 (7) - 1/2 stacking should preferably not be done in conjunction with 1/4, 01:20:918 (9) - . Could otherwise just unstack the first stack like this. Break in flow will work as emphasis for the sound.
29. 01:26:449 - Could end the slider here instead, to cover both that impact as well as 01:26:543 - .
30. 01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - 5-note streams might be a bit over the top for a Hard. It's sort of edge-case so would recommend you try something else if possible.
31. 01:53:449 (2,3) - In this case the white > red priority for sliders applies, so basically swap them rhythmically.
    
    [Lost's Light Insane]
32. 01:02:262 (3,4) - Might want to stack this considering that 01:00:762 (3,4) - 01:03:762 (3,4) - 01:05:262 (3,4) - etc are stacked, being part of the same concept.
33. 01:21:387 (1) - This NC looks a bit out of place.
    
    [Insane]
34. 00:22:137 (4,6) - Could avoid this overlap by changing the pattern of the second one.
35. 00:24:012 (1,2,3) - Seems like a lot of notes are sort of cramped together, which sort of damages the visual appeal. Try spreading them out, in this case moving 00:24:012 (1) - downwards or whatnot.
36. 00:57:762 (1,1,1,1,1) - This is a lot of NCing, try removing the new combo on 00:58:137 (1) - .
37. 01:04:512 (4,5) - Not going to stack the tail and head like 01:03:012 (1,2) - 01:08:262 (7,1) - 01:11:262 (7,1) - were done?
38. 02:07:512 (1,2) - 02:09:012 (4,5) - Similarly to how many of the other tails and heads are stacked, could stack these too for visual consistency.

1. 00:15:855 (1) - นี่หยุดตรงนี้เพราะขึ้นห้องใหม่ใช่มั้ย -- ลดไปให้หยุดที่ 00:17:168 - ซะ เพราะมันงงมาก งงจริงๆ -.- (เพิ่ม Break ด้วยนะ)
2. 00:24:012 (3) - NC ตรงนี้เพราะขึ้นจังหวะใหม่ ลบตรงนี้ละกัน 00:25:512 (1) - และไปใส่ตรงนี้แทน 00:27:012 (7) -
3. 00:32:262 (2) - จริงๆ ทำเป็น 1/2 Slider ก้ได้นะ ดูเข้าดีกว่าด้วยแหละ
4. 00:35:262 - Spinner ควรเริ่มตรงนี้นะ ไม่ใช่ 00:34:699 -
5. 00:40:512 (4) - NC ด้วยครับ จังหวะคนละแบบกันเลย 00:51:012 (4) - ด้วย
6. 01:00:012 (1,2) - ตัวทำลาย Flow ชั้นดีย์
7. 01:03:012 (1,2,3) - แนะนำว่าให้ทำใหม่ มองยังไงก้ผิดอ่ะ แบบนี้มะ
8. 01:31:512 (3,4) - กะต็อด 4 มาทางซ้ายหน่อย มันขัดๆ .-.
9. 01:33:012 (1) - ขยับตาม 4 แล้วก้เอาลงมาด้วยนะ ลงนิดนึง
10. 01:39:012 (1) - NC จ่ะ
11. 01:52:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - 01:55:512 (1,2,3,4) - เอาตรงๆ มองผ่านๆไม่คิดอะไร พอมาดูอีกทีคืออะไร ทำไมใช้ 1/2 เยอะแบบยาวเลย ทั้งๆที่ทั้งแมพคง 1/1 มาแต่เน้น DS ห่างๆ ถ้าคิดว่าตาม Vocal จริงๆ แล้ว 01:58:512 (1,2,3,4) - ล่ะ????
12. 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) - ตรงนี้คิดว่าจะมีปัญหากับผู้เล่นใหม่ กับเราด้วยแหละจริงๆ เพราะก่อนหน้านี้ (ช่วง 02:04:512 - ถึง 02:15:762 -) ไม่ได้ใช้ 1/2 แต่ดันมา 1/2 เอาอีตอนท้ายกระทันหัน เป็นเราก้ตั้งตัวไม่ทันนะจริงๆ แนะว่ให้ทำ 1/2 ช่วงที่กล่าวมาข้างต้นด้วย จะดีมาก ตาม Vocal พอดีแหละ La la la la la land

1. Don't you use Kitty's Advanced for diff name?
2. 00:15:012 (1) - NC here cus it's being slowly
3. 00:33:574 (2,3) - I don't know why you place them like this, it's kinda weird try this imo
4. 00:37:137 (1) - ....?? why??
5. 00:37:512 - I bet you're forgot to change sampleset to default lel
6. 01:27:762 (3,4,1) - Don't you make them be a perfect triangle? (like 01:24:012 (1,2,3) - )
7. 01:37:137 (3,4) - Change to slider for more better? (01:38:637 (4) - 01:40:137 (3) - )
8. 01:43:887 - 01:52:137 - It's kinda a slow rhythm.. I don't know what are you thinking about this, for me this is unnecessary part. And this part has more frequency of the circle than 01:52:512 - tho
9. 02:03:012 (4) - Remove NC and add a new one 02:03:387 (1) -
10. 02:18:949 (4) - Well, this circle is following the rhythm but 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - is now following the vocal with the same part... remove 02:18:949 (4) - for more newbie readable and 02:19:512 - this part is fine cus it's a new rhythm here :3

1. 00:17:168 - ไม่แน่ใจว่าควรเพิ่ม Break เข้าไปมั้ย
2. 00:21:012 (1) - NC ค่ะ เพราะมันมีแค่ Combo ตรงนี้ที่มันเกิน 4 ลองไปดูตรงอื่นที่ท่อนเดียวกันสิ อิอิ
3. 00:40:512 (6) - NCCCCCCC เอาเหตุผลด้วยมั้ยยย ;-; 00:46:512 (5) - นี่ด้วยค่าาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาา
4. 00:57:012 (1,2) - ห่างกับ 00:58:512 (3) - แบบเห็นได้ชัดเลย ไม่มีจังหวะให้เน้นด้วยนะ ;-;
5. 01:03:012 (1) - จงหาความแตกต่างกับ 01:08:262 (7) - แน่นอนว่าจังหวะเดียวกัน แต่ถ้าให้เดา คงเอา NC ที่เส้นใหญ่เป็นหลัก เอาให้ดีนะ ลบ NC 01:03:012 (1) - เพิ่มใหม่ตรง 01:03:762 (2) - จะดีกว่า อิอิ
6. 01:16:512 (1) - NC นี่อีก
7. 01:21:949 (5) - ลด Reverse มา 1 จุด มันสามารถทำให้ Player งงได้ เราเช่นกัน
8. 01:29:637 (1,1) - ไม่น่าห่างนะ เข้าใจว่าจังหวะหนักแต่ว่า 01:29:262 (3,1) - มันก้ห่างพอๆกันอ่ะ เล่น HD คือ Miss แน่ๆ = ="
9. 01:19:512 (5) - อันนี้ไม่แน่ใจว่าจะ NC ดีมั้ย แต่อยากให้ NC เพราะจังหวะพาไปมากกว่า imo
10. 01:33:199 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - แบบนี้ดีกว่ามั้ย จะได้ให้จังหวะรัวไปเน้นตรง 01:34:324 (7,8,1) - ไม่งงด้วย
11. 01:40:512 (5) - NC
12. 01:58:512 (1) - ทำไมทำแบบนี้ ทำ 1/1 แล้วใส่ Circle ตรงนี้ 01:59:449 - แทนเหอะ -*-

1. 00:09:668 (2) - จังหวะช้าอยู่เลยนะพี่ มา 1/4 เลยหรอ .-.
2. 00:36:012 (4) - ถ้าจะลากให้ตัวนี้จังหวะยาว คิดว่าแบบนี้น่าจะเข้ากันมากกว่า
3. 00:56:074 (5,1) - คิดว่า NC ตรง 00:56:262 (1) - ผิดอ่ะ เพราะพี่ตามเสียง Vocal แล้วมันยังอยู่คำเดียวกันอยู่เลย *remains*
4. 01:21:387 (1) - ทำไม NC ตรงนี้อ่ะกรรม
5. 01:22:324 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ เพราะจังหวะกลองมันหนักมาก

1. 00:25:512 (1,2) - โดดบรรลัยวายวอด ห่างกันไปมั้ย ถถถถ
2. 01:06:762 (3,4) - คือตรงนี้ไม่มีที่วาง 4 ใช่มั้ย ถถถถ เอามาวางไว้ซัก x:28 y:80 ก้ได้ โดดกับ 01:07:512 (5) - ใส่ NC ตรง 5 ด้วยก้ได้ :v
3. 01:16:512 (5) - เพิ่ม NC ตรงนี้ แล้วไปลบตรง 01:17:262 (7) -

1. อยากให้เปลี่ยนเป็น Extra ไปเลยเพราะว่าดิฟ Extra จริงๆเป็น Liberation ไปแล้ว GG
2. 00:05:262 (2) - ทำเป็น Slider เถอะ DS 00:04:512 (1,2) - เท่ากันกับ 1/1 Circle เลยนะ --
3. 00:37:512 - ตั้งแต่ท่อนนี้จะใช้ DS 2.5x โดยประมาณ และท่อนนี้ก้เช่นกัน 00:40:512 - แต่ว่ามันคนละจังหวะเลย คือมันผิดมาก เห็นได้ชัดแจ๋ว
4. 01:19:324 (2) - ตรงนี้มันควรจะมี Triple เหมือนกับ 01:18:762 (2,3,4) - 01:18:199 (2,3,4) - เพราะมันอยู่ในท่อนเดียวกัน หันไปทางเดียวกันอีก แนะนำ
5. 01:20:262 (1) - 01:20:449 (4) - ลบ NC ออก
6. 01:22:324 (6) - NC ตรงนี้เพราะเน้นจังหวะกลอง ที่จริงอยากให้ทำเป็นรูปร่างใหม่ที่ไม่ได้ก็อปมาจาก 01:22:137 (5) - เพราะมันจังหวะหนักด้วย
7. 01:22:887 (1) - นี่ก้ควรเป็น 1/4 Slider
8. 01:23:637 (1) - NC ออก
9. 01:30:762 (3) - NC ใหม่ตรงนี้
10. 01:42:012 (3) - ย้าย 3 มาไว้ตรง x:498 Y:201 ให้มันเป็นสามเหลี่ยมแบบดีๆ
11. 01:52:512 - ท่อนนี้ Player ถูกเซ็ตเป็นที่เรียบร้อยแล้วว่าต้องเล่น 1/2 นะ จนกระทั่ง 02:01:980 (2) - มาจากไหนนนนนน 02:03:480 (2) - นี่อีก DS ชิดไม่ได้ช่วยเลยนะ -.-

1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - เอาอีกและ :v
2. 00:25:137 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ 00:25:512 (1) - ลบ NC ออก 00:26:637 (1) - ลบ NC ออกอีกรอบ :v
3. 00:46:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - DS เน่าหมดเลย -.-
4. 01:19:512 (1,2,3,4) - พอทำให้มันเรียงแล้วแปลกๆ ลอง
5. 01:22:324 (6) - NC ด้วย ถ้าทำเป็น Slider หักจะดีมากกกกก
6. 01:22:887 (1) - ควรเป็น 1/4 Slider
7. 01:28:887 (1,1) - ทำไม NC ทั้งๆที่รัวก่อนหน้านี้ไม่เห็น NC แบบเดียวกันเป๊ะ 00:31:137 (3,3) - 01:16:512 (1,2,3,4) -
8. 01:33:387 (3,4,5,6) - เราว่ารัวตรงนี้ผิดอ่ะ คือมันมีจังหวะที่เป็นเสีบง ติ๊งๆๆๆๆ อยู่ แล้วมารัวเป็น Circle แทนมันเลยแปลกๆ ใส่ 1/4 แทนไป แล้วทำให้เป็นรูปร่างเดียวกัน ประมาณว่าแบบนี้ แล้ว 01:33:762 (1,2,3) - มันก้ตามเสียงติ้งๆด้วยไง
9. 02:01:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - เกลียดจำพวกรัวแบบนี้ รัวแบบห่างแล้ว Stack 5555
10. 02:03:012 (1) - NC ออก

Naxess wrote:

[Lost's Light Insane]

1. 01:02:262 (3,4) - Might want to stack this considering that 01:00:762 (3,4) - 01:03:762 (3,4) - 01:05:262 (3,4) - etc are stacked, being part of the same concept. yes fixed
2. 01:21:387 (1) - This NC looks a bit out of place. fixed

BoatKrab wrote:

หิว kds ค่ะ

[Lost's Light Insane]

1. 00:09:668 (2) - จังหวะช้าอยู่เลยนะพี่ มา 1/4 เลยหรอ .-. ตามเสียงไวโอลินนะ
2. 00:36:012 (4) - ถ้าจะลากให้ตัวนี้จังหวะยาว คิดว่าแบบนี้น่าจะเข้ากันมากกว่า fixed
3. 00:56:074 (5,1) - คิดว่า NC ตรง 00:56:262 (1) - ผิดอ่ะ เพราะพี่ตามเสียง Vocal แล้วมันยังอยู่คำเดียวกันอยู่เลย *remains* fixed
4. 01:21:387 (1) - ทำไม NC ตรงนี้อ่ะกรรม ม็อดบนบอกไปแล้วจ้า
5. 01:22:324 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ เพราะจังหวะกลองมันหนักมาก fixed

ปรมาจารย์เช่นเคย ม็อดไม่ออก ;w; เง้อ ดีแล้วม็อดยาวขก. แก้ 5555