1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted

Sinnoh wrote:

this is nice
i'd turn of skin whenever playing because the colours are too dark for me, could increase brightness for more people to play with colours i think it's kinda okay, not too dark for me xd
00:17:027 (1) - Lack of hitsound imo, should use whistle as well because keysound isn’t enough here wtf when did i changed this?

Insane
01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - This actually flowed really well, you could potentially use it on the other diffs too since it’s something memorable xd
01:35:637 (1) - Bit of a combo breaker due to high spacing + SV Really? I think it's not a problem. but i fixed the spacing :D

Light Extra
this is the diff that I would normally play, more things about distances here
00:17:027 (1) - Just position this a little closer, clicked too late i think that's okay, but i may try to move (2) a little bit closer
00:27:574 (2) - this flows better if moved a bit to the right, bit too far in the corner i'll try
00:32:074 (2,3) - flow from 2 to 3 would be slightly better if 3 was moved up, so that it lines up better. could move 2 down or other things instead well, i tried to move (2) instead since i can't move (3) cuz it'll affect to DS
01:09:762 (3,4,1) - could probably make a better triangle with these I didn't intend to make a triangle here. I tried to make (3)'s slider blanket with (1)
01:15:762 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow too well here, angle is really wide. minor improvement but could ctrl-j 1, better visual flow with next pattern not look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1,1) - flow is really killed here, here's a silly fix, try it maybe https://puu.sh/vgo9c/ac84b469b9.png (although kinda silly) I intead make something similiar to this. ;)
01:18:949 (4,1) - this jump should not be this big, no sound on it idk where should i put here ;;
01:20:262 (1,1) - Hard to read because the head of the slider here is hiding behind 01:20:074 (2) - , I thin it's not a big problem and i think it's playable, but i'll stack (1)'s slider-tail to (1).
01:22:324 (6) - I get that it's an important part to emphasise, but it might be too jumpy in this general area. 6 would be a lot better if it was closer to the stream k
01:29:074 (2,1) - can you make this jump a bit smaller I'm afraid i can't (no explain sry cuz hard to explain)
01:29:449 (2) - drawing from pishi's newest video, this one has a clear kick on both head and tail, should make a triple for music imo leave it as a slider-kick also okay too
01:40:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - should be a little closer since not as intense imo, but opinion I think it's kinda near xd
02:16:512 (1) - this section DS increases compared to the previous?? should really change K

ExtraLiberation
00:01:512 (1) - Slider head/reverse/tail don’t really make sense, higher pitched violins should be clickable here. 1/1 sliders would suit more. There’s potential gimmicks you could play with SV here too if you did it, low sv on 00:01:512 (1) - and higher on 00:02:262 (2) - would match pitch changes well K
00:17:027 (3) - Could potentially do this since it’s the top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I think i'll make somethink as boat's diff does.
00:48:387 (2,3) - would be better if you ctrl-g for spacing emphasis + would make flow angles on 2 and 3 the same (they’re different angle = different emphasis right now) but you don’t the snare too often so idk idk this looks bad for me and i wanna keep ds here too so. .-.
01:19:324 (4,1) - doesn’t flow too well, even for emphasis. 1 should at least be a little more to the right of the head of 1 holy. i'll make a new one now ;w;
01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
01:22:137 (5,1,1) - Really breaks circular flow here, the stream should be going clockwise to follow flow POTASSIUM K
01:22:793 (4,1) - Could add more emphasis here no. i thin it's all the same so it don't need to emphasize imo.


SB are fuck. Kill me when they are finish :)
posted
Sotarks's Stuff

Sotarks wrote:


[BoatKrab]
00:48:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ok your insane diff has the most complexe rythmn and density here compared to those extras lol, and how the fuck you hear constant 1/2 beats here xd yeaaa please don't use such jumps section for such a calm part..
but yeah otherwise it's pretty good structure here and aesthetics XD pls nerfffff
:V nerf for a bit

01:41:449 (1) - this is so damn hard to read!! well, I added 01:41:355 (5) - and NC at 01:41:449 (1) - for more readable already
Sinnoh

Sinnoh wrote:


Boatkrab
00:17:027 (3) - A lot more readable with the suggestion i put in top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I decide to reduce their DS, must be fine now ;w;
00:47:074 (3,4) - Not really sightreadable since use used the exact same spacing on a 1/2 before where???!
01:16:512 (5,1) - Can you unstack these, in the previous section you established that overlap = 1/2, but this breaks it. You need to unstack it so that the stream can be read as 1/4
good diff Thx :3


Thanks for mods :3
posted
@boatkrab what I meant, same ds but different rhythm
https://puu.sh/vgzab/e25a70bb96.png

@frontier 01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
unsure what happened, but I think there was a 4x repeat slider before. may have selected wrong thingy
posted
may not answer all replies since i have irl stuff to do due it's songkran festival here :D
posted
o/ Here's your mod

Not gonna lie, this is a great mapset and tbh I can't find much to work with as there's like 30secs of it being intensive with the rest being really straightforward and like 2* in difficulty lol, just a few overlaps that bothered me for the most part. So all of these are just suggestions as I haven't found anything 'wrong' with any of the difficulties really...
So if you feel I'm nitpicking, that's because the map is just this good.

Liberation:
collapsed text
01:24:574 (5) - could move this somewhere else, feels too close to the triple
01:40:887 (3) - either stack it with reverse slider or move 01:40:887 (3) - a bit to the left so the overlaps are the same
01:53:637 (3,4) and 02:11:262 (3,5) - I don't think these overlaps are necessary.


Light Extra:
collapsed text
00:20:637 (4,1) - I don't think overlaps like this look good, especially when you do a different kind of overlap here 00:25:137 (4,1) .
00:51:762 (3,1) - Space them a bit so they don't overlap, the vocals get a bit more intensive here as well so it won't screw your emphasis.
01:04:137 (3,1) - Stuff like this, you're only using it here from what I can see, unless all these weird overlaps are your motif for this map, I'd recommend getting rid of them. Up to you~
01:16:887 (2,1) - another one
01:39:574 (4) - I'd move it to x:228 y24 so the follow points go right through 01:39:012 (1) 's center.
01:57:012 (3) - move to x:28 y:326 so overlaps are the same on all 3 sliders


BoatKrab's Insane:
collapsed text
00:21:762 (3,4,1,2) & 00:28:512 (1,2) - Make these overlaps the same
00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like this part, would go with something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7805426 , it's a more natural jump imo
01:21:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Make it smoother maybe?
01:57:012 (3) - I'd go with a bit more curved slider here.
02:17:074 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NCs like here 02:19:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1)


Insane:
collapsed text
02:08:262 (2,5) - make these overlaps the same, and that's pretty much it... can't find anything in this diff


Lost's Light Insane:
collapsed text
00:45:012 (4) - move a bit up so the sliders don't touch
01:02:262 (3,4) - Think it'll be better if you make these a mirror of 01:00:762 (3,4), it follows the pattern afterwards too
01:53:637 (3) - slightly down so the sliders don't touch
01:59:637 (3,4) - ^



Normal:
collapsed text
00:34:605 (1) - I think extending this spinner to 00:36:762 works better maybe?
01:41:262 (5) - maybe place another reverse slider starting on red here instead so it follows the music better?


Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked.
posted

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Lost's Light Insane:
collapsed text
00:45:012 (4) - move a bit up so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:02:262 (3,4) - Think it'll be better if you make these a mirror of 01:00:762 (3,4), it follows the pattern afterwards too i don't think so :cry:
01:53:637 (3) - slightly down so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:59:637 (3,4) - ^ fixed



Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked.


Thanks, Wanko-san ( ´ω` )

warp : http://puu.sh/vhT2Q/d022a64edf.rar
posted
no comment = fixed cuz really busy. sorry guys

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Not gonna lie, this is a great mapset and tbh I can't find much to work with as there's like 30secs of it being intensive with the rest being really straightforward and like 2* in difficulty lol, just a few overlaps that bothered me for the most part. So all of these are just suggestions as I haven't found anything 'wrong' with any of the difficulties really...
So if you feel I'm nitpicking, that's because the map is just this good.

Liberation:
collapsed text
01:24:574 (5) - could move this somewhere else, feels too close to the triple
01:40:887 (3) - either stack it with reverse slider or move 01:40:887 (3) - a bit to the left so the overlaps are the same instead moving (5) to stack with (3)
01:53:637 (3,4) and 02:11:262 (3,5) - I don't think these overlaps are necessary. imo they look nice & i keep ds.


Light Extra:
collapsed text
00:20:637 (4,1) - I don't think overlaps like this look good, especially when you do a different kind of overlap here 00:25:137 (4,1) . They didn't overlap each other. Just slightly but not overlap
00:51:762 (3,1) - Space them a bit so they don't overlap, the vocals get a bit more intensive here as well so it won't screw your emphasis.
01:04:137 (3,1) - Stuff like this, you're only using it here from what I can see, unless all these weird overlaps are your motif for this map, I'd recommend getting rid of them. Up to you~ they look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1) - another one ^
01:39:574 (4) - I'd move it to x:228 y24 so the follow points go right through 01:39:012 (1) 's center.
01:57:012 (3) - move to x:28 y:326 so overlaps are the same on all 3 sliders keep ds here


Insane:
collapsed text
02:08:262 (2,5) - make these overlaps the same, and that's pretty much it... can't find anything in this diff


Normal:
collapsed text
00:34:605 (1) - I think extending this spinner to 00:36:762 works better maybe?
01:41:262 (5) - maybe place another reverse slider starting on red here instead so it follows the music better? 01:41:449 isn't very intense here so i think it's bad idea


Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked. Thanks!
posted

Sinnoh wrote:

@boatkrab what I meant, same ds but different rhythm
https://puu.sh/vgzab/e25a70bb96.png

this is familiar for triple circles but I alway did 1/4 sliders to make a sign for the rhythm like this
may not a problem


Wanko wrote:


BoatKrab's Insane:
collapsed text
00:21:762 (3,4,1,2) & 00:28:512 (1,2) - Make these overlaps the same tell me why... .-.
00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like this part, would go with something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7805426 , it's a more natural jump imo I fixed on my own :3
01:21:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Make it smoother maybe?
01:57:012 (3) - I'd go with a bit more curved slider here. but I wouldn't ;w;
02:17:074 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NCs like here 02:19:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) I can't do it, if it be 02:17:262 (2) - must be start a new nc and 02:17:074 (1) - will be only 1 on combos without a reason ;w;


Thanks :3

Update:
https://puu.sh/vi1ih/90186781ff.rar
posted
I'd suggest moving ft. Guriri to title instead of artist as in official video.Also 구리리 is Guriri's korean name so you can ad it to non-romanised.
reference
This is the only official metadata source rn so you'd better stick to this.

Also since i see you like adding a lot of tags, you can add korean, all of the artists are from there, arent they

wish i could mod but can't really help, sorry. Good luck on the map buddy
posted

Pappy wrote:

I'd suggest moving ft. Guriri to title instead of artist as in official video.Also 구리리 is Guriri's korean name so you can ad it to non-romanised.
reference
This is the only official metadata source rn so you'd better stick to this.

Also since i see you like adding a lot of tags, you can add korean, all of the artists are from there, arent they

wish i could mod but can't really help, sorry. Good luck on the map buddy


yeah. im not sure about this ;w;
  1. I will add guriri in the title!
  2. but i think it's okay to not put her korean name into title cuz i see no map add that korean name (e.g https://osu.ppy.sh/s/128645) <, i know it's an old map xd. i will put that name into tags instead and i will also add her japanese name too :D


Thanks for helping my map <3
posted
this is pretty good
and i dont say that to anyone often

[g]
02:25:699 - theres glissando try end spinner here sounds more fitting
this seems like last goodbye farewell type song more than liberating so idk if u wanna change diff name here

[sb]
check ur lyrics in some certain places idk where u copied this from but
01:11:824 - it doesnt have 'be' in song
02:07:512 - this says 'i love you too always deeply'
02:16:512 - this doesnt have 'i will '

[liberation]
01:22:324 (1) - remove nc
02:02:074 - why is there a random green line here lol

[light ex]
00:46:137 (4,1) - nazi blanket 1s end get too close
00:54:012 (1,2) - edit this part a bit and try to avoid this overlap http://puu.sh/viYuU/058b5893f2.jpg
01:41:637 (1,2) - can u make it easier by place it over slidertails location instead of the head cuz its weaker sound http://puu.sh/viYDH/ef7953bc78.jpg
02:09:387 (1) - literally no sound

[เรือ in]

00:44:168 - could map 1/4 for dat flute thing
01:15:012 (1) - pls dont do this, fucing r u i n e d especially with this stack leniency http://puu.sh/viYWq/745991765a.jpg
01:24:668 - no piano here atleast change previous note to kickslider or smh to follow it properly

gl
dam i woulda wanted to gd extra for this
and i dont say dat often also
posted

Deppyforce wrote:

this is pretty good
and i dont say that to anyone often THX

[g]
02:25:699 - theres glissando try end spinner here sounds more fitting k
this seems like last goodbye farewell type song more than liberating so idk if u wanna change diff name here the reason why i name this diff like this cuz "2. ดอก Marigold หรือดอกดาวเรืองนั้น มีความหมายถึงความสิ้นหวังและความเศร้าโศกอันเนื่องมาจากการสูญเสียความรักไป". so i name it like this xd

[sb]
check ur lyrics in some certain places idk where u copied this from but i got it from this official vid
01:11:824 - it doesnt have 'be' in song
02:07:512 - this says 'i love you too always deeply'
02:16:512 - this doesnt have 'i will '

[liberation]
01:22:324 (1) - remove nc k
02:02:074 - why is there a random green line here lol idk boat did it xd

[light ex]
00:46:137 (4,1) - nazi blanket 1s end get too close sorry
00:54:012 (1,2) - edit this part a bit and try to avoid this overlap http://puu.sh/viYuU/058b5893f2.jpg i instead moving (3) away
01:41:637 (1,2) - can u make it easier by place it over slidertails location instead of the head cuz its weaker sound http://puu.sh/viYDH/ef7953bc78.jpg k
02:09:387 (1) - literally no sound k

gl

Deppyforce wrote:

dam i woulda wanted to gd extra for this
and i dont say dat often also IF YOU CAN MAKE SOMEKIND OF 5.1* THEN YOU GO!!!!!
posted

Deppyforce wrote:

[เรือ in]

อ็อบเจ็ค ฟิกซ์
00:44:168 - could map 1/4 for dat flute thing I didn't follow the flute for the first
01:15:012 (1) - pls dont do this, fucing r u i n e d especially with this stack leniency http://puu.sh/viYWq/745991765a.jpg
01:24:668 - no piano here atleast change previous note to kickslider or smh to follow it properly มันขาดตอน ถถถถ ;-;

gl


Done: https://puu.sh/vkHEl/8b1e8e87f1.rar
posted
Well, Since the creator was not sure about metadata, I'm here to help a bit!

I founded some links about metadata, so it's up to you to prefer used which one!

Metadata found from Deemo!
Artist: M2U
Title: Marigold

Information: We can see M2U as Composer and Marigold as Title, so yeah!
Metadata found from M2U Official Twitter!
Artist: M2U ft.Guriri
Title: Marigold

Information: It's a tweet from M2U, we can used it :3
Metadata found from SQUARE MUSIQ (스퀘어 뮤직) Official Youtube!
Artist: M2U
Title: Marigold ft. Guriri

Information: We can see it from the video title, so yep! :3


For Information, Guriri never used her Japanese or Korean name. So, We can add it to tags!

https://twitter.com/Guriri0

Good Luck! :3
posted
hello from m4m queue
Lost
00:31:137 (4,1) - im really unsure if you should overlap almost the entire slider body
01:07:137 (4,1) - the overlap feels weird since you didnt overlap patterns on previous section
Insane
00:25:980 (2,3,4,5) - please move closer to slider tail (1) ;w;
02:16:512 (1,2,3,4) - no need to overlap imo since you didnt on 02:19:512 (1,2,3) -
Liberation
01:05:637 (6,1) - spacing too large imo. 2.60-2.90x should be enough
01:33:949 (2) - can ctrl+g if you want, also to keep consistent ds with 01:34:137 (3,4) -


that's all I can suggest.. the mapset is really good i dont have anything good to point out ;w;

good luck!
posted
Greetings

So I was casually browsing through the modding queues when I found this. Storyboard seems really nice, mapped cleanly too. Did you make the storyboard?


  • [General]
  1. Might want to silence the soft-sliderslide, kind of disrupts the calm in some parts of the song, for example 00:13:512 - . Here, take this 44 byte blank wav.
  2. Might want to raise the HP of boatkrab's insane to fit the settings of adjacent difficulties.
  3. The snapping of 00:16:012 - is 1/12 in some diffs and 1/16 in others, try keeping these the same. Personally I think 1/16 sounds more accurate, but better to check with others as well.

    [Normal]
  4. 00:45:012 (3) - Try moving the red anchor to the slidertick to reflect the sound at 00:45:387 - , like 00:39:012 (3) - does.
  5. 00:59:262 - This SV change doesn't do anything atm, but I'm pretty sure newer modders may catch on to it and think it's a problem, so consider removing it.
  6. 01:53:449 - This density is a bit high for being such a calm section. Especially in comparison to the others. Try replacing that rhythm with a circle instead, to lower the density. Take a look at 01:59:637 - , for example.
  7. 02:02:262 (2) - 00:47:262 (5) - If possible I would've liked for distinct sounds like these to stand out by having both impacts be circles, rather than being a slider like the rest. Although, it might be beyond the scope of rhythmical density intended for the difficulty. Even so, there is headroom available in terms of SR.
  8. 02:19:512 (1,2,3,1) - Instead of continuing this slider train, I would have notably reduced SV here, along with density. Could try something like this for rhythm.

    [KittyAdventure's Advanced]
  9. 00:01:512 - Some conflicting custom sample settings here, unify them to avoid technical issues in the map.
  10. 00:03:574 - This rhythm feels a bit too dense for being the intro, and this is actually more intense than how the Hard is mapped here. The constant use of circles in between sliders becomes slightly repetitive, especially when used consecutively like this. The contrast between 00:10:512 - and 00:13:512 - is kind of lacking, as well. Because of the repeating pattern of 1/1s and circles, two 1/2s like 00:15:012 (5,6) - also becomes a bit unexpected. This is a lot of things for one section, so would suggest you rework this. Try lowering the overall density a bit to bring more contrast between this part and 00:19:512 - .
  11. 00:21:949 (2) - This impact happens at 00:22:043 - , and not the red tick. Would start a slider from 00:21:762 - , where a prominent snare exists and a click would be more predictable instead. Additionally, would turn 00:22:137 - into a 1/2 slider or circle with 1/1 gap, as 00:22:324 - isn't very strong.
  12. 00:22:512 - is also pretty much the same as 00:21:762 - 00:28:512 - etc, but with a different pitch, so would make if rhythm was somewhat similar.
  13. 00:25:324 - Preferably the circles right before prominent sounds should be placed differently than others, for the sake of making it stand out properly. In this case 00:26:074 (2,3) - is pretty much arranged in the same way 00:25:324 (3,1) - is. Could otherwise stack 00:25:324 (3) - on 00:25:512 (1) - . There's another case at 01:05:824 (6) - , where things are both stacked and unstacked at times, so would change the rhythm, sort of like 01:11:262 (3,4) - 01:08:262 (3,4) - were done.
  14. 00:28:512 (1,2) - For sliders, there's usually a general rule of thumb that white ticks take priority over red ticks, and red over blue, etc, unless the song suggests otherwise. So swapping these rhythmically would make it seem more natural to play, especially since 00:28:512 - is stronger in this case, and 00:28:699 - weaker than 00:28:887 - .
  15. 00:33:012 - This is where density should decrease, but it seems to continue like it did before, which kind of fails to express what the song is doing here. I realize 00:33:762 - is a rhythm technique to switch instrumental layer, but it's usually discouraged in calmer sections, as it requires the player to focus more, which again, goes against how the song sounds here. Could instead try something like this.
  16. 00:44:074 (2) - Here, 00:44:074 - is weaker than 00:44:262 - . I realize you're following the flute, but the flute is no longer heard at 00:44:262 - , where another instrument starts. This leads to players expecting it to be clickable, hence why it feels awkward in gameplay. Would try this instead, where vocals are also prioritized.
  17. 00:57:762 - Two distinct impacts, so would try two circles, where the second could be stacked over 00:58:512 (1) - , to emphasize the transition. Applies to 02:02:262 (3) - as well.
  18. 01:35:262 (4,5) - Could swap these rhythmically to emphasize 01:35:637 - 01:35:824 - , as the current is the same way 01:33:762 (3,4,1,2) - are done, for instance, which wouldn't be good contrast.
  19. 01:41:637 - It's important that rhythm density correlates to the intensity of the song. Having things like 01:42:199 (2,3,4,5,1) - , may fit the individual sounds, but it doesn't fit the song at the time when comparing this section to others. Could try making use of some SV changes as well to make lower density sections feel slower.
  20. 01:43:512 - This part is a break in all other difficulties. Are you sure you don't want any breaks in the map? It is still around 2:30 in length.
  21. 01:58:512 (1) - Refrain from cramping sliders this much, this looks really bad lol
  22. 02:16:512 - This starts off well, but the density quickly starts spiraling into 02:18:012 (1,2,3,4) - and some really dense stuff like 02:20:262 (3,4,5,6) - . Would highly suggest you reconsider parts like these.

    Calm parts may need some work, some sliders start on weaker sounds than they end or roll over etc. There's some things to look into here, although it is relatively new so I suppose it's to be expected.

    [Hard]
  23. Going to ignore the gap here since we're waiting for kittyadventure's adv. aand it's here
  24. 00:21:762 (7,8) - 00:22:512 (1,2) - Having two different ways to indicate 1/4 may get slightly confusing. These are also the same sounds so having both the same would make sense. Same would apply to 00:28:512 (1,2) - , depending on what you do.
  25. 00:35:262 (5,6) - This would work better if they were rhythmically swapped. Generally priority will go white > red > blue etc, unless the song suggests otherwise, meaning 00:35:262 - would be the start of the slider, and 00:35:637 - would be the circle. This way you'll also rhythmically emphasize 00:35:824 - through contrast.
  26. 00:44:449 - These sliderends felt kind of awkward after previously clicking on the same sound, 00:38:449 - , additionally, 00:44:262 - might want to be covered. In it's current state, this will probably cause players to lift too early. Slider is just a bit too long, and you'd expect to click on the beginning of a new stanza.
  27. 00:47:262 (6) - Could replace this with two circles instead to give contrast from 00:46:512 (5) - , in order to reflect the more prominent sounds here, similarly to what was suggested in Normal. Would also apply to 02:02:262 (2) - .
  28. 01:20:262 (7) - 1/2 stacking should preferably not be done in conjunction with 1/4, 01:20:918 (9) - . Could otherwise just unstack the first stack like this. Break in flow will work as emphasis for the sound.
  29. 01:26:449 - Could end the slider here instead, to cover both that impact as well as 01:26:543 - .
  30. 01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - 5-note streams might be a bit over the top for a Hard. It's sort of edge-case so would recommend you try something else if possible.
  31. 01:53:449 (2,3) - In this case the white > red priority for sliders applies, so basically swap them rhythmically.

    [Lost's Light Insane]
  32. 01:02:262 (3,4) - Might want to stack this considering that 01:00:762 (3,4) - 01:03:762 (3,4) - 01:05:262 (3,4) - etc are stacked, being part of the same concept.
  33. 01:21:387 (1) - This NC looks a bit out of place.

    [Insane]
  34. 00:22:137 (4,6) - Could avoid this overlap by changing the pattern of the second one.
  35. 00:24:012 (1,2,3) - Seems like a lot of notes are sort of cramped together, which sort of damages the visual appeal. Try spreading them out, in this case moving 00:24:012 (1) - downwards or whatnot.
  36. 00:57:762 (1,1,1,1,1) - This is a lot of NCing, try removing the new combo on 00:58:137 (1) - .
  37. 01:04:512 (4,5) - Not going to stack the tail and head like 01:03:012 (1,2) - 01:08:262 (7,1) - 01:11:262 (7,1) - were done?
  38. 02:07:512 (1,2) - 02:09:012 (4,5) - Similarly to how many of the other tails and heads are stacked, could stack these too for visual consistency.


@BoatKrab, you've got conflicting custom sampleset settings on 00:01:512 - .

I can check back in two or three weeks to see how things are going, along with modding the rest, if you'd like.
posted
หิว kds ค่ะ

[Normal]
  1. 00:15:855 (1) - นี่หยุดตรงนี้เพราะขึ้นห้องใหม่ใช่มั้ย -- ลดไปให้หยุดที่ 00:17:168 - ซะ เพราะมันงงมาก งงจริงๆ -.- (เพิ่ม Break ด้วยนะ)
  2. 00:24:012 (3) - NC ตรงนี้เพราะขึ้นจังหวะใหม่ ลบตรงนี้ละกัน 00:25:512 (1) - และไปใส่ตรงนี้แทน 00:27:012 (7) -
  3. 00:32:262 (2) - จริงๆ ทำเป็น 1/2 Slider ก้ได้นะ ดูเข้าดีกว่าด้วยแหละ
  4. 00:35:262 - Spinner ควรเริ่มตรงนี้นะ ไม่ใช่ 00:34:699 -
  5. 00:40:512 (4) - NC ด้วยครับ จังหวะคนละแบบกันเลย 00:51:012 (4) - ด้วย
  6. 01:00:012 (1,2) - ตัวทำลาย Flow ชั้นดีย์
  7. 01:03:012 (1,2,3) - แนะนำว่าให้ทำใหม่ มองยังไงก้ผิดอ่ะ แบบนี้มะ
  8. 01:31:512 (3,4) - กะต็อด 4 มาทางซ้ายหน่อย มันขัดๆ .-.
  9. 01:33:012 (1) - ขยับตาม 4 แล้วก้เอาลงมาด้วยนะ ลงนิดนึง
  10. 01:39:012 (1) - NC จ่ะ
  11. 01:52:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - 01:55:512 (1,2,3,4) - เอาตรงๆ มองผ่านๆไม่คิดอะไร พอมาดูอีกทีคืออะไร ทำไมใช้ 1/2 เยอะแบบยาวเลย ทั้งๆที่ทั้งแมพคง 1/1 มาแต่เน้น DS ห่างๆ ถ้าคิดว่าตาม Vocal จริงๆ แล้ว 01:58:512 (1,2,3,4) - ล่ะ????
  12. 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) - ตรงนี้คิดว่าจะมีปัญหากับผู้เล่นใหม่ กับเราด้วยแหละจริงๆ เพราะก่อนหน้านี้ (ช่วง 02:04:512 - ถึง 02:15:762 -) ไม่ได้ใช้ 1/2 แต่ดันมา 1/2 เอาอีตอนท้ายกระทันหัน เป็นเราก้ตั้งตัวไม่ทันนะจริงๆ แนะว่ให้ทำ 1/2 ช่วงที่กล่าวมาข้างต้นด้วย จะดีมาก ตาม Vocal พอดีแหละ La la la la la land


ดิฟดีย์ แต่ว่าแปลกๆ 55555+

[KittyAdventure's Advanced]
  1. Don't you use Kitty's Advanced for diff name?
  2. 00:15:012 (1) - NC here cus it's being slowly
  3. 00:33:574 (2,3) - I don't know why you place them like this, it's kinda weird try this imo
  4. 00:37:137 (1) - ....?? why??
  5. 00:37:512 - I bet you're forgot to change sampleset to default lel
  6. 01:27:762 (3,4,1) - Don't you make them be a perfect triangle? (like 01:24:012 (1,2,3) - )
  7. 01:37:137 (3,4) - Change to slider for more better? (01:38:637 (4) - 01:40:137 (3) - )
  8. 01:43:887 - 01:52:137 - It's kinda a slow rhythm.. I don't know what are you thinking about this, for me this is unnecessary part. And this part has more frequency of the circle than 01:52:512 - tho
  9. 02:03:012 (4) - Remove NC and add a new one 02:03:387 (1) -
  10. 02:18:949 (4) - Well, this circle is following the rhythm but 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - is now following the vocal with the same part... remove 02:18:949 (4) - for more newbie readable and 02:19:512 - this part is fine cus it's a new rhythm here :3


Good job as always, Kitty <3

[Hard]
  1. 00:17:168 - ไม่แน่ใจว่าควรเพิ่ม Break เข้าไปมั้ย
  2. 00:21:012 (1) - NC ค่ะ เพราะมันมีแค่ Combo ตรงนี้ที่มันเกิน 4 ลองไปดูตรงอื่นที่ท่อนเดียวกันสิ อิอิ
  3. 00:40:512 (6) - NCCCCCCC เอาเหตุผลด้วยมั้ยยย ;-; 00:46:512 (5) - นี่ด้วยค่าาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาาา
  4. 00:57:012 (1,2) - ห่างกับ 00:58:512 (3) - แบบเห็นได้ชัดเลย ไม่มีจังหวะให้เน้นด้วยนะ ;-;
  5. 01:03:012 (1) - จงหาความแตกต่างกับ 01:08:262 (7) - แน่นอนว่าจังหวะเดียวกัน แต่ถ้าให้เดา คงเอา NC ที่เส้นใหญ่เป็นหลัก เอาให้ดีนะ ลบ NC 01:03:012 (1) - เพิ่มใหม่ตรง 01:03:762 (2) - จะดีกว่า อิอิ
  6. 01:16:512 (1) - NC นี่อีก
  7. 01:21:949 (5) - ลด Reverse มา 1 จุด มันสามารถทำให้ Player งงได้ เราเช่นกัน
  8. 01:29:637 (1,1) - ไม่น่าห่างนะ เข้าใจว่าจังหวะหนักแต่ว่า 01:29:262 (3,1) - มันก้ห่างพอๆกันอ่ะ เล่น HD คือ Miss แน่ๆ = ="
  9. 01:19:512 (5) - อันนี้ไม่แน่ใจว่าจะ NC ดีมั้ย แต่อยากให้ NC เพราะจังหวะพาไปมากกว่า imo
  10. 01:33:199 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - แบบนี้ดีกว่ามั้ย จะได้ให้จังหวะรัวไปเน้นตรง 01:34:324 (7,8,1) - ไม่งงด้วย
  11. 01:40:512 (5) - NC
  12. 01:58:512 (1) - ทำไมทำแบบนี้ ทำ 1/1 แล้วใส่ Circle ตรงนี้ 01:59:449 - แทนเหอะ -*-

อยากให้ฝึก NC เยอะๆ ไม่ต้องกลัวว่าจะถี่ไป เอาให้มันเข้าจังหวะก่อน เรื่องอื่นไว้ค่อยปรับทีหลัง

[Lost's Light Insane]
  1. 00:09:668 (2) - จังหวะช้าอยู่เลยนะพี่ มา 1/4 เลยหรอ .-.
  2. 00:36:012 (4) - ถ้าจะลากให้ตัวนี้จังหวะยาว คิดว่าแบบนี้น่าจะเข้ากันมากกว่า
  3. 00:56:074 (5,1) - คิดว่า NC ตรง 00:56:262 (1) - ผิดอ่ะ เพราะพี่ตามเสียง Vocal แล้วมันยังอยู่คำเดียวกันอยู่เลย *remains*
  4. 01:21:387 (1) - ทำไม NC ตรงนี้อ่ะกรรม
  5. 01:22:324 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ เพราะจังหวะกลองมันหนักมาก

ปรมาจารย์เช่นเคย ม็อดไม่ออก ;w;

[Insane]
  1. 00:25:512 (1,2) - โดดบรรลัยวายวอด ห่างกันไปมั้ย ถถถถ
  2. 01:06:762 (3,4) - คือตรงนี้ไม่มีที่วาง 4 ใช่มั้ย ถถถถ เอามาวางไว้ซัก x:28 y:80 ก้ได้ โดดกับ 01:07:512 (5) - ใส่ NC ตรง 5 ด้วยก้ได้ :v
  3. 01:16:512 (5) - เพิ่ม NC ตรงนี้ แล้วไปลบตรง 01:17:262 (7) -

ใช้ได้เลย สวยดีๆ จำได้ว่าเคยม็อดมากกว่านี้ อี Chrome เลว

[Light Extra]
  1. อยากให้เปลี่ยนเป็น Extra ไปเลยเพราะว่าดิฟ Extra จริงๆเป็น Liberation ไปแล้ว GG
  2. 00:05:262 (2) - ทำเป็น Slider เถอะ DS 00:04:512 (1,2) - เท่ากันกับ 1/1 Circle เลยนะ --
  3. 00:37:512 - ตั้งแต่ท่อนนี้จะใช้ DS 2.5x โดยประมาณ และท่อนนี้ก้เช่นกัน 00:40:512 - แต่ว่ามันคนละจังหวะเลย คือมันผิดมาก เห็นได้ชัดแจ๋ว
  4. 01:19:324 (2) - ตรงนี้มันควรจะมี Triple เหมือนกับ 01:18:762 (2,3,4) - 01:18:199 (2,3,4) - เพราะมันอยู่ในท่อนเดียวกัน หันไปทางเดียวกันอีก แนะนำ
  5. 01:20:262 (1) - 01:20:449 (4) - ลบ NC ออก
  6. 01:22:324 (6) - NC ตรงนี้เพราะเน้นจังหวะกลอง ที่จริงอยากให้ทำเป็นรูปร่างใหม่ที่ไม่ได้ก็อปมาจาก 01:22:137 (5) - เพราะมันจังหวะหนักด้วย
  7. 01:22:887 (1) - นี่ก้ควรเป็น 1/4 Slider
  8. 01:23:637 (1) - NC ออก
  9. 01:30:762 (3) - NC ใหม่ตรงนี้
  10. 01:42:012 (3) - ย้าย 3 มาไว้ตรง x:498 Y:201 ให้มันเป็นสามเหลี่ยมแบบดีๆ
  11. 01:52:512 - ท่อนนี้ Player ถูกเซ็ตเป็นที่เรียบร้อยแล้วว่าต้องเล่น 1/2 นะ จนกระทั่ง 02:01:980 (2) - มาจากไหนนนนนน 02:03:480 (2) - นี่อีก DS ชิดไม่ได้ช่วยเลยนะ -.-

ถือว่าสวยดีนะ ชอบๆ 555

[Library]
  1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - เอาอีกและ :v
  2. 00:25:137 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ 00:25:512 (1) - ลบ NC ออก 00:26:637 (1) - ลบ NC ออกอีกรอบ :v
  3. 00:46:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - DS เน่าหมดเลย -.-
  4. 01:19:512 (1,2,3,4) - พอทำให้มันเรียงแล้วแปลกๆ ลอง
  5. 01:22:324 (6) - NC ด้วย ถ้าทำเป็น Slider หักจะดีมากกกกก
  6. 01:22:887 (1) - ควรเป็น 1/4 Slider
  7. 01:28:887 (1,1) - ทำไม NC ทั้งๆที่รัวก่อนหน้านี้ไม่เห็น NC แบบเดียวกันเป๊ะ 00:31:137 (3,3) - 01:16:512 (1,2,3,4) -
  8. 01:33:387 (3,4,5,6) - เราว่ารัวตรงนี้ผิดอ่ะ คือมันมีจังหวะที่เป็นเสีบง ติ๊งๆๆๆๆ อยู่ แล้วมารัวเป็น Circle แทนมันเลยแปลกๆ ใส่ 1/4 แทนไป แล้วทำให้เป็นรูปร่างเดียวกัน ประมาณว่าแบบนี้ แล้ว 01:33:762 (1,2,3) - มันก้ตามเสียงติ้งๆด้วยไง
  9. 02:01:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - เกลียดจำพวกรัวแบบนี้ รัวแบบห่างแล้ว Stack 5555
  10. 02:03:012 (1) - NC ออก

ดิฟนี้ชอบสุดละ เล่นมันดี แต่ก้แปลกๆไปบางช่วง ขัดซะหมดเลย

[]
ในที่สุดก้ม็อดเสร็จ ;w;
edit.1 จริงๆม็อดต่อละ แต่อี Chrome เลว แม่งดับ หายเลย
posted

Naxess wrote:



[Lost's Light Insane]
  1. 01:02:262 (3,4) - Might want to stack this considering that 01:00:762 (3,4) - 01:03:762 (3,4) - 01:05:262 (3,4) - etc are stacked, being part of the same concept. yes fixed
  2. 01:21:387 (1) - This NC looks a bit out of place. fixed

BoatKrab wrote:

หิว kds ค่ะ

[Lost's Light Insane]
  1. 00:09:668 (2) - จังหวะช้าอยู่เลยนะพี่ มา 1/4 เลยหรอ .-. ตามเสียงไวโอลินนะ
  2. 00:36:012 (4) - ถ้าจะลากให้ตัวนี้จังหวะยาว คิดว่าแบบนี้น่าจะเข้ากันมากกว่า fixed
  3. 00:56:074 (5,1) - คิดว่า NC ตรง 00:56:262 (1) - ผิดอ่ะ เพราะพี่ตามเสียง Vocal แล้วมันยังอยู่คำเดียวกันอยู่เลย *remains* fixed
  4. 01:21:387 (1) - ทำไม NC ตรงนี้อ่ะกรรม ม็อดบนบอกไปแล้วจ้า
  5. 01:22:324 (7) - NC ตรงนี้ เพราะจังหวะกลองมันหนักมาก fixed

ปรมาจารย์เช่นเคย ม็อดไม่ออก ;w; เง้อ ดีแล้วม็อดยาวขก. แก้ 5555


Thanks Naxess, BoatKrab :)

warp http://puu.sh/vld2k/620fb15e57.rar
posted
Yo

Storyboard
- 00:43:283 - The lyrics disappear too quickly hear, since the text is gone before the vocals sing "as I".
- 00:47:730 - Similar thing, I think this seems to be reoccuring throughout the SB.
- 01:43:512 - I'd maybe put something interesting here rather than just black since there's a break in most diffs here, there'll be more people who could pay attention to the SB.
- 02:07:699 - I think the lyrics go "love you too always deeply".

Normal
- 00:18:012 - Maybe lower the volume for the spinner end? Alternatively end it at 00:17:074 to match the piano.
- 00:30:012 (1,2,1) - Maybe make these equal spacing so distance-time equality is easier to read?
- 00:49:512 (3) - I would rotate this slightly so that the visual flow through 2-3 looks a little neater.

KittyAdventure's Advanced
- 01:21:762 (3) - I would consider making this a reverse slider to reflect the fast piano notes here.
- 01:54:012 (1) - Such a sharp slider feels out of place to me, especially next to 01:54:762 (3).
- 01:58:512 (1) - This seems kind of random too.

Hard
- 00:43:512 (1) - This long slider misses quite a few piano notes that you could potentially map to, and I feel mapping 00:44:449 to an active beat would emphasise the vocals better like you did at 00:38:449.
- 01:34:137 (6,7,8) - This may be a little too difficult for a Hard diff to both read and understand how to play. A 5-note stream may work since you used one earlier, or just stick with repeat sliders.
- 01:58:512 (1) - Similar issue as the first slider.

Lost's Light Insane
- 00:25:512 (1) - I'd suggest shortening this to the red tick and then placing a circle on the blue so that the stream is a little easier to follow, since it's easier to recognise when to release the slider this way.
- 01:11:637 (4) - I would Ctrl+J this so that the offset in the angle makes it easier to recognise this is two sliders.

Insane
- 00:59:262 (1,1) - I would suggest making these patterns like in my image so that only one movement is required to start following the faster slider making it more comfortable to follow. This applies to other parts in this diff and the higher diffs I guess.

BoatKrab's Insane
- 00:57:012 (1,2,3,1) - I would arrange these similar to how you did at 00:46:512 (1,2,3,4) so it's a little easier to read the timing (I would make 1 a circle in this case).
- 01:03:762 (2) - I would end this slider at 01:04:137 so that it matches the timing of the vocals.
- 02:21:574 (2,1) - I don't think increasing the spacing is necessary for this since this final vocal note is a lot softer.

Light Extra
- 01:25:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like the spacing between the triple and the other circles should be increased to reflect the intensity of the song better, and since you used larger spacing for the kick sliders in this section, this one triple feels underwhelming.
- 02:01:980 (2) - I would suggest something like in my image so that at least one of the stronger beats are clicked.
- 02:03:480 (2) - Could do the same thing here I guess.

Liberation
- 00:55:137 (4,1) - This flow seems pretty uncomfortable for me, which could be improved. I'd say something like this would be better:
- 00:57:012 (1) - I would snap this to either the red or white tick so that it's easier to recognise when to release the slider.
- 01:21:012 (1,1) - This feels kind of uncomfortable and difficult to follow too. I would rotate 01:21:199 (1,2,3) by 180 degrees personally.
- 01:25:699 (1,2,1) - Perfect stacking these probably isn't a good idea, since I couldn't tell this was a 1/8 triple when I was playtesting. I would just offset stack these like a normal triple.
posted
Hello ,
NM from my q

[Normal]
00:33:012 (1) - might be make non curved for visual identity with previous slider, will be feels a bit better as it have less intense in song, also might to put it a bit down, for making start spinner closer to center, it's more comfortable imo
01:00:012 (1) - ctrl-j with idea 01:00:012 (1,3) - blanket , seems cool https://puu.sh/vloht.jpg
01:35:262 (4) - move it to ~ x83 y132 , alose if rotate it ~25 degrees i"ll get https://puu.sh/vloG0.jpg imo more neat variation
01:52:512 (1,2,3) - kind a overmapped for calm part, rhythm suggestion: https://puu.sh/vloPi.jpg or http://puu.sh/vlphQ.jpg <- also make sense to move red dot for end of "you" for emphreise it better

[Advanced]
00:15:012 (5,6) - unexpected rhythm, have no idea why You broke rhythm destiny Suggestion: http://puu.sh/vlq8d.jpg
00:25:512 (1,2,3) - that undermapped stream feels weird, catch 1 beat inside line of identical beats is not best idea Maybe: https://puu.sh/vlqS5.jpg
00:28:699 - Beat kinda weak and it made me confused when i was forced to click it, especially with unclickable strong one 00:28:887 -
suggestion: https://puu.sh/vlqJF.jpg
00:33:574 (2,3,4) - Your ability swaps from strong beats to weak makes me sad :? Suggestion to strong beats: https://puu.sh/vlreh.jpg
01:33:762 (3) - from 01:33:762 - reverse slider fits for repetitive sounds well
01:35:262 (4,5) - ctrl-g by rhythm for 01:34:887 - 01:35:262 - same impact from equal big beats
01:41:637 (1) - 01:42:762 - based exactly on similar sounds ... make sense to do 1/2 reverse 01:42:762 - as well
02:18:387 (2,3,4) - cmon, it's advanced, make less intance for 2 last beat, like 3 1/2 sliders, its calm part so a bit undermap fits well.
02:19:887 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - fogot about last suggestion, this one is really dumb.... You know your hardest moment in map in lastest calmest section... cmon...

[Hard]
00:30:012 - make sense to add one more green line with like ~0.85 SV. There is music becomes calmer with zero emphasis about it on map, and
changes 00:33:012 - feels too sharp, after previous section.
01:01:512 (5,6) - maybe use more softer angle , now it stands out from other 1/2 jumps in this part.
01:14:824 (5) - hmm, why did You spaced it? Vocal? imo it's too much for vocal here, i suggest to nerf this jump 01:14:262 (4,5) -
01:20:262 (7,8,9,1) - i suggest don't use 1/4 and 1/2 stack nearly, it's hard to catch with this AR. Simply unstack 1/2 would work well
rest good

[light Insane]
The best light insane, which I played per 1.5 years

[Insane]
00:20:168 - Make sense to map this sound as it really noticeable, i suggest triple http://puu.sh/vlsz3.jpg and it fits well with your
destiny 00:21:762 (3,4) - 00:22:887 (6,7,1) - Actually 00:20:168 - sounds like 00:26:074 (3,4,5) -
01:04:512 (4,5) - stack it on 4th tail like You did earlier for consistency
01:34:137 - hmm it's too weak to be clicable, it feels much better as continue 4th https://puu.sh/vlt9B.jpg , yeah ruin same time sliders but still better for playability imo...

[]
too tired today, stop here...
Yeah... it's good mapset. Really, i want to see it ranked.
Well done.
GL.
Please sign in to reply.