1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted
M4M from my queue

[General]
Enable epilepsy warning coz 00:19:512 and flashy thingy

[Normal]
00:52:137 (5) - x:340 y:236?
else is fine

[Hard]
I highly reccomend you to avoid stack :3
AR 6 is too low :/
00:21:762 (7,8,1) - highly chance to unreadable
00:56:262 (4) - made this a red anchor could be better. or..
example

Yes, a Gero-ish slider

01:17:262 (1,1,1) - These are seriously unpredictable for a Hard diff.
01:35:637 (1) - First anchor might be around x:296
02:10:512 (1,2,1,2,3) -
example

Not really sure about this tho, through its my opinion
If you do this, you might want 02:11:824 (2) - to keep at that place. Its up to you too


[Lost]
00:08:824 (5,1) - Dont touch them?
00:24:574 (2,3) - I'd prefer to blanket them
01:12:012 (1,3) - Fix blanket~
01:35:637 (3,1) - Blanket?
01:36:574 (3,5,6,1) - Its not a good idea to stack them..

[Insane]
oh this is good~~
02:21:762 (1) - x:304 y:280?

[BoarKrab]
00:29:918 (5,1) - Why this doesn't have the same spacing?
Overall this diff is pretty quiet than other diff, dunno why its 4.43*, there are more things to map in this diff, but it just seems undermapped imo
but pp mapping lul

[Light ex]
00:13:512 (1,2) - Blanket them perfectly
00:39:574 (2,3) - CTRL + <

Ex seems ok

omg short and not really helpful mod, no kds if this is seriously not helpful.
posted

Error- wrote:

M4M from my queue

[Lost]
00:08:824 (5,1) - Dont touch them? Fixed
00:24:574 (2,3) - I'd prefer to blanket them Fixed
01:12:012 (1,3) - Fix blanket~ Fixed
01:35:637 (3,1) - Blanket? Fixed
01:36:574 (3,5,6,1) - Its not a good idea to stack them.. Fixed


omg short and not really helpful mod, no kds if this is seriously not helpful.
Warp > http://puu.sh/veisD/ff50b0c837.rar <
posted

Error- wrote:

[BoarKrab]
00:29:918 (5,1) - Why this doesn't have the same spacing? First, to be a sign for new rhythm. 2nd, to stack with 00:29:262 (1) - and if I move 00:29:637 (2,3,4,5) - to make 00:29:918 (5,1) - be the same ds... it would be too close for 00:29:262 (1) - and it will destroy this pattern 00:30:012 (1,2,1,2) - too ;w;

Overall this diff is pretty quiet than other diff, dunno why its 4.43*, there are more things to map in this diff, but it just seems undermapped imo
SR Deceiver hehe xD

but pp mapping lul
Thanks :D
posted
no comment = Fixed, okay?
I asked him what diff. I waited for a reply about 69 hours and I just realized that is EX diff wtf.

Smokeman wrote:

NM

pics are only examples

00:07:137 (2,3,4,5,1) - the flute thingy is not dominant enough to justify a 1/4 rythm here. Try a 1/4 repeatslider if you really want to emphasise it, although i think it doesnt really add to this part of the song since its still relativly calm I instead change to 1/2 pattern here.
00:10:512 (1,2,3,4) - you could flip 00:09:012 (3) - and move 00:10:137 (4) - further upwards so you have more space for 00:10:137 (4) - to move upwards. so then you can do this https://puu.sh/vdBZh/bb78cd9ca9.png oh! looks nice :) (btw wtf you use ar0?)
00:15:762 (1,1,1) - the timing on these is waaay off !!! You should let someone check and time it properly if you cant do it :[ previous mod already shows me how should i mapped here.
00:19:980 - add a note, cuz the violin has started playing here already : )
00:20:637 (6) - make this look a bit different from 00:20:262 (5) - (00:20:262 (5) - is more intense) sv contrast sounds like a good idea I keep DS here
00:21:012 (1,2,3) - spacing equality? Looks wierd when playing (i noticed atleast) / Make the contrast more noticable 00:21:012 (1,2) - shorter, 00:21:574 (2,3) - lardger spacing. example: https://puu.sh/vdzSD/08cc187538.jpg (1,0 to 1,7)
00:22:043 - shoudl be clickable imo It looks weird when I do this
00:22:512 (1,2) - same ^
00:23:168 (3,1) - ingame it is stacked like this https://puu.sh/vdzWC/e3b121aeab.png . i think moving 00:23:262 (1) - upwards (having it spaced) would emphasise the note a lot better. (bad)example https://puu.sh/vdA0X/dbd4e03800.png i made a triangle here
00:25:137 (7) - chaneg here change what?
00:25:887 (2,3,4,5,1) - having a buildup here seems like a good way to emphasise the growing intensity of this part in the song. Just a long spaced stream feels too dull. https://puu.sh/vdAlZ/635074ea0f.png
00:26:449 (2) - the intensity of the music is allready gone here 00:26:355 - . High spacing 00:26:262 (1,2,3) - just felt unfitting playing. ctrl+g 00:26:449 (2) - and readjusting the pattern a bit should do the trick
00:26:637 (3,4,5,6) - and the stack looks like this ingame https://puu.sh/vdA8R/6afe660ec6.png . I'd suggest somethign following the path of the previous slider like this https://puu.sh/vdAeT/61fb36ce40.png
00:27:387 (2) - move this closer to 00:27:012 (1) - and further down so the path to 00:27:762 (3) - follows the slider curve making it a much smoother transition (which i think it fitting, a good way to emphasise this part). e.g. x:100|y:364
00:27:762 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - you could have a lessen the spacing here according to the intensity of the intrumentation. (althought it be hard to get the pattern to fit so only do this if you feel like remapping a bunch of stuff ._.) So hard for me ;w; so I instead reduce overall. xD
00:29:262 (3,4,5,6) - in my opinion a 1/4 slider on 00:29:262 (3) - would make this stand out more since this sound in the music stands out aswell. Atm it just looks like the pattern you used for the melody 00:27:762 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - which doesnt quite for for this new thing here. https://puu.sh/vdB8G/0a536cf949.png ;w; Looks bad 4 me
00:32:637 (3,4,5) - having a bit of movement between 00:32:543 (2,3) - would make the transition less abrupt. I'll tried ;(
00:46:512 (1,2) - 00:46:980 (2,3) - 00:47:637 (4,1) - even though you chaneg the slider velocity here, i think it would add to the visuals if you moved these further appart making their borders clearer and lovelier to read :^D I didn't change sv here xd but i fix some
01:19:512 (1,2,3) - why reduce the spacing here ? The vocals are still going strong and it feels way off to slow down : ( I tried to increase the SV ;(
01:19:887 (3,2) - would also fix this overlap if you moved further apart from 01:19:512 (1) - and from each other. k
01:28:512 (1) - dont let this be similar to 01:28:699 (2,1,2,1,2) - since it shouldnt follow the same intensity (since the intense part starts at 01:28:699 (2) - ) Think of a way to distinguish them! I think it's okay tho
01:36:012 - 01:41:449 - should be kiai aswell ?

AR 9.2 feeks kinda overkill since this is such a low BPM song. AR9 should be fine and feels much better to play on imo (its not really a densly packed map either you know) okay

pm me if you have questions, didnt proofread what i wrote down xD

baaaai!

Error- wrote:

M4M from my queue

[General]
Enable epilepsy warning coz 00:19:512 and flashy thingy later after sb finish :D

[Normal]
00:52:137 (5) - x:340 y:236? instead move to x:348 y:248
else is fine

[Hard]
I highly reccomend you to avoid stack :3 I think it's okay when play in-game
AR 6 is too low :/ Increase to ar7
00:21:762 (7,8,1) - highly chance to unreadable
00:56:262 (4) - made this a red anchor could be better. or.. sorry, not my style ;w;
example

Yes, a Gero-ish slider

01:17:262 (1,1,1) - These are seriously unpredictable for a Hard diff.
01:35:637 (1) - First anchor might be around x:296 i instead moved to x:300
02:10:512 (1,2,1,2,3) - Nice idea, but i prefer mine
example

Not really sure about this tho, through its my opinion
If you do this, you might want 02:11:824 (2) - to keep at that place. Its up to you too


[Insane]
oh this is good~~ Thanks!
02:21:762 (1) - x:304 y:280?

[Light ex]
00:13:512 (1,2) - Blanket them perfectly
00:39:574 (2,3) - CTRL + <

Ex seems ok

omg short and not really helpful mod, no kds if this is seriously not helpful. Better than mine ;w;
Thanks to all ^^

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul
posted
hi from m4m

[General]
not really a mod looking at the general stuff, just wanted to point something that applies to multiple diffs xd
00:15:762 - the snaps here should be consistent throughout all diffs to follow the song, even if it is GD map lol. after listening at 25% i think the best snaps are here http://puu.sh/veEVu/2b570b14e0.jpg (the first one is on 1/6 beat snap)

times are 00:15:762 - 00:16:012 - 00:16:277 - 00:16:652 -

[Ex]
  1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - 1/4 timing is very unexpected to play since it comes right after the break, the large spacing makes it look more like 1/2. maybe you can try like this http://puu.sh/veCpe/73de46c438.jpg
  2. 00:20:262 (5,6) - try using something different for these two since they are mapping very different sounding instruments in the song
  3. 00:22:512 (1,2,3) - maybe use the same spacing between them
  4. 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - would flow much better if you switched them around, due to the angle that the previous circle is coming from http://puu.sh/veCFt/847498691c.jpg
  5. 00:33:762 (2,3,4) - try to use a higher sv here. maybe it was intentional but i think its very easy to be confused for 1/4 because of the SV used earlier. like .75 is ok, you can switch the sv back for the next part, just increase a little here.
  6. 00:43:512 (1,2) - try to shorten the slider to 3/4 and start the reversing slider at the white tick because the stronger sound is at the white so making the
    click for blue tick plays poorly imo
  7. 00:46:512 (1,2) - ^
  8. 00:46:512 (1,2,3) - this pattern is really cramped, some more spacing would be fine
  9. 01:16:887 (1) - no need to nc this. like 00:31:699 (2,3,4) - 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - 01:18:762 (1,2,3,4) - etc.
  10. 01:22:137 (5,1,1) - flow is not very good because the very small spacing between the sliders into a very large spacing for the next jump. also i think it should be closer to the next stream because musically its part of the next pattern as you can tell from the hitsounds. maybe you can try like here or something http://puu.sh/veDDi/db29cc33ad.jpg
  11. 01:22:887 (1,2,3,4,1) - this curve can be better considering the placement of the previous circle
  12. 01:25:699 (1,2) - these should be snapped to the 1/8 , i cant hear any 1/12 here so yeah

    Ranking Criteria Guidelines wrote:

    Sliderends of extended sliders should be snapped according to the song's beat structure. If the song is using a straight beat, 1/4 or 1/8 are recommended. If the song is using a swing beat, 1/6 or 1/12 are recommended. If the song has a beat in a different position from what was recommended, snapping to an actual beat always takes priority.
  13. 01:25:887 (1,4) - maybe should avoid this overlap
  14. 01:31:887 (1) - no need to nc
  15. 01:33:199 (1) - no nc


i love the kiai part

[Lost Light's Insane]
  1. 00:11:262 (2,3) - blanket can be better
  2. 00:15:762 (4,5) - check the general section for what i think is the correct snaps here
  3. 00:22:043 - missing an important piano sound here. maybe try extending the previous slider http://puu.sh/veFcq/32fa2307d9.jpg
  4. 00:34:324 (5) - check ds
  5. 00:35:262 (2) - i dont hear the reason why this is just one long slider theres no one instrument that goes this whole duration
  6. 00:52:512 (5,6) - try moving 6 over a little so it kinda blankets http://puu.sh/veFke/045ee705f2.jpg
  7. 01:21:012 (1) - i dont agree with this rhythm choice, its skipping over strong piano melody sounds at the red
  8. 01:24:012 (1) - maybe you should try to include the triple that can be heard at the red tick
  9. 01:35:637 (3) - i recommend using NC here because theres a really big difference in SV
  10. 01:35:637 (3,1) - curves could match better


that's all from me, good luck!
posted

eeezzzeee wrote:

hi from m4m

[General]
not really a mod looking at the general stuff, just wanted to point something that applies to multiple diffs xd
00:15:762 - the snaps here should be consistent throughout all diffs to follow the song, even if it is GD map lol. after listening at 25% i think the best snaps are here http://puu.sh/veEVu/2b570b14e0.jpg (the first one is on 1/6 beat snap) Wow!! Really thank you! T-T
times are 00:15:762 - 00:16:012 - 00:16:277 - 00:16:652 -

[Ex]
  1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - 1/4 timing is very unexpected to play since it comes right after the break, the large spacing makes it look more like 1/2. maybe you can try like this http://puu.sh/veCpe/73de46c438.jpg okay! that looks great!
  2. 00:20:262 (5,6) - try using something different for these two since they are mapping very different sounding instruments in the song i instead change to 1/2 slider to make it as the other diffs do
  3. 00:22:512 (1,2,3) - maybe use the same spacing between them okay
  4. 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - would flow much better if you switched them around, due to the angle that the previous circle is coming from http://puu.sh/veCFt/847498691c.jpg okay
  5. 00:33:762 (2,3,4) - try to use a higher sv here. maybe it was intentional but i think its very easy to be confused for 1/4 because of the SV used earlier. like .75 is ok, you can switch the sv back for the next part, just increase a little here. That's a great idea, but the next 1/2 slider (00:35:262 (2))have to change the sv as well? Also, the song in this part is kinda calm. The players may know that the slider should be slow as well so I don't think a players would be confused here.
  6. 00:43:512 (1,2) - try to shorten the slider to 3/4 and start the reversing slider at the white tick because the stronger sound is at the white so making the
    click for blue tick plays poorly imo okay
  7. 00:46:512 (1,2) - ^ oh im sorry. i couldn't fix here xd
  8. 00:46:512 (1,2,3) - this pattern is really cramped, some more spacing would be fine Really? I think it's kinda far enough
  9. 01:16:887 (1) - no need to nc this. like 00:31:699 (2,3,4) - 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - 01:18:762 (1,2,3,4) - etc. okay
  10. 01:22:137 (5,1,1) - flow is not very good because the very small spacing between the sliders into a very large spacing for the next jump. also i think it should be closer to the next stream because musically its part of the next pattern as you can tell from the hitsounds. maybe you can try like here or something http://puu.sh/veDDi/db29cc33ad.jpg okay
  11. 01:22:887 (1,2,3,4,1) - this curve can be better considering the placement of the previous circle okay
  12. 01:25:699 (1,2) - these should be snapped to the 1/8 , i cant hear any 1/12 here so yeah okay

    Ranking Criteria Guidelines wrote:

    Sliderends of extended sliders should be snapped according to the song's beat structure. If the song is using a straight beat, 1/4 or 1/8 are recommended. If the song is using a swing beat, 1/6 or 1/12 are recommended. If the song has a beat in a different position from what was recommended, snapping to an actual beat always takes priority.
  13. 01:25:887 (1,4) - maybe should avoid this overlap okay
  14. 01:31:887 (1) - no need to nc okay
  15. 01:33:199 (1) - no nc okay


i love the kiai part Thanks!

that's all from me, good luck! Thanks a lot <3
posted
spoiler sb lol
posted

Battle wrote:

spoiler sb lol
can i give you kd? xd

edit. 800th posts! yay
posted

eeezzzeee wrote:

hi from m4m
[Lost Light's Insane]
  1. 00:11:262 (2,3) - blanket can be better fixed
  2. 00:15:762 (4,5) - check the general section for what i think is the correct snaps here fixed
  3. 00:22:043 - missing an important piano sound here. maybe try extending the previous slider http://puu.sh/veFcq/32fa2307d9.jpg fixed
  4. 00:34:324 (5) - check ds fixed
  5. 00:35:262 (2) - i dont hear the reason why this is just one long slider theres no one instrument that goes this whole duration fixed
  6. 00:52:512 (5,6) - try moving 6 over a little so it kinda blankets http://puu.sh/veFke/045ee705f2.jpg fixed
  7. 01:21:012 (1) - i dont agree with this rhythm choice, its skipping over strong piano melody sounds at the red fixed
  8. 01:24:012 (1) - maybe you should try to include the triple that can be heard at the red tick fixed
  9. 01:35:637 (3) - i recommend using NC here because theres a really big difference in SV fixed
  10. 01:35:637 (3,1) - curves could match better nope ;w;


that's all from me, good luck!
warp > http://puu.sh/vfyib/04b0d38109.rar <
posted
hi m4m from q

[Ex]
imo i would change the diff name 'cause it's kibb's diffname trademark xdxd

00:15:762 (1,2) - i would change the rythmn here to smth like this

00:32:824 (4,5,1) - reduce the spacing would be prefered

00:46:980 (2) - would be prefered to change those into circle to mark the difference between 00:43:887 (2) - this.

01:09:574 (2,4) - can you use same spacing for those 2 ?

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - that plays really badly tbh

02:07:512 (1,2) - stack them like you did before

[Light Extra]
01:23:824 (2) - stack it xd

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - ye maybe u liek those patterns but it gives no emphasis by movment, i'd rather do smth more straight

01:31:512 (5) - 2 circles for those 2 claps emphasis?

really cool diff waow!

[BoatKrab]
00:48:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ok your insane diff has the most complexe rythmn and density here compared to those extras lol, and how the fuck you hear constant 1/2 beats here xd yeaaa please don't use such jumps section for such a calm part..
but yeah otherwise it's pretty good structure here and aesthetics XD pls nerfffff

01:41:449 (1) - this is so damn hard to read!!

[]
GL
posted
Hey o/ from Q
This is hard to mod :(

Ex
Ex


is this an extra?

00:07:887 (2) - i think you could make it just a normal slider and 00:08:637 - this clickable, it could fit better since music is getting higher on this point

00:09:012 (3) - maybe make SV a bit higher, the same reason as above

00:15:762 (1) - lower SV could be nice

00:26:637 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe distance this a bit more

00:29:262 (3,4,5,6,7) - you could play a bit with volume here, try raising it a bit matching the song, just a personal suggestion

00:39:012 (1) - i think this should be more distanced from last note, vocals have a little spike here

00:44:449 (3) - imo a circle fits better 00:44:824 - here, slider into circle

00:54:762 (3,4) - i think these two are too lineal compared to the rest of the section, talking about the pattern, maybe play a bit with 2nd slider so it doesn't
stay the same as first one? idk if i explained myself well sorry

00:58:137 (7) - maybe lower SV a bit? adding some contrast and reflecting vocals, only for this slider

01:04:512 (4,5) - you could do the same as 01:03:012 (1,2) - here maybe?

01:08:262 (7,1) - the same here but maybe move so it overlaps the same way

01:12:012 (1) - i think you can fix blanket

01:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - Beautiful

01:19:324 (4,1) - maybe you could stick to the same movement you used before, this is more spiky than last ones

01:19:512 (1,2,3) - i think these should have more distance since you put some big intensity on hitsounds

01:22:887 (1,2,3,4) - imo these should be 2 1/4 sliders instead of a stream because of the piano change, but this is pretty personal, just a choice

01:23:637 (4) - hm you emphasized a lot this slider tail, probably a circle fits better

01:25:699 (1,2,1) - nice D, maybe lower tails volume a bit, it can be distracting somehow

01:33:199 (2,3) - this should be a slider imo, piano starts 01:33:387 (4) - here

01:36:012 (1) - you could try to put this closer to last slider, i think this jump is a bit out of the map since you don't use it, just here

02:03:387 - you miss some sounds, i think you just decided to map vocals but i'll still point it

02:07:324 (8,1) - maybe stack them? as you did 02:08:824 (3,4) - here and later
Light Extra
Light Extra


00:22:887 (2) - maybe make it blanket or do the same as you did before

00:30:012 (1,3) - don't make them touch maybe

00:32:918 - i think this is more noticeable so it should be mapped imo

00:40:512 (1) - i think this looks a bit meh for this section, maybe try not to make it that curvy

00:50:824 (4) - this isn't necessary

00:51:762 (3,1) - you could make a better blanket

00:57:574 (1) - i think this should have more distance because intensity
01:15:012 (1) - ^

01:17:262 (1,1) - i think this looks messy, try to change 2nd slider, maybe different shape or move it

01:18:012 (1) - hm i think this spike is too big for the map overall

01:20:887 (2,3,4) - this isn't necessary at all, on an extra maybe, i think you should just put two 1/4 circles instead of this


This song is so good, nice map
Good Luck!
posted
Hi there from t/579994, NM as promised,

I like the map, just a few suggestions.
Normal
01:04:512 (3) - This note seems too close to 01:03:012 (1). I reckon you should move it further away.
01:31:137 (2,3) - I think you should have the 3 blanket 01:30:012 (1) by moving the 2 a little further down. https://puu.sh/vghGY/e14a1a0d1b.png
Hard
00:32:262 (3) - Doesn't change the map a lot, but it does look nicer: https://puu.sh/vghV2/394c9f6da3.png
02:15:762 (7,1) - Blanket these notes?


Light insane diff is very well done. I can't see anything to improve.

Insane
01:18:387 (2,3) - Blanket these two sliders?


All the others diffs are good. Sorry if my suggestions weren't helpful, I tried my best.
posted

Sotarks wrote:

hi m4m from q

[Ex]
imo i would change the diff name 'cause it's kibb's diffname trademark xdxd lol can i change my diff name to melancholy? xD But I will change my diff name to "liberation"

00:15:762 (1,2) - i would change the rythmn here to smth like this There isn't a consistent rhythm here. So, I would like to keep this one.

00:32:824 (4,5,1) - reduce the spacing would be prefered okay

00:46:980 (2) - would be prefered to change those into circle to mark the difference between 00:43:887 (2) - this. oh! that's nice.

01:09:574 (2,4) - can you use same spacing for those 2 ? sure

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - that plays really badly tbh Well, I saw on rrtyui's map and i think it's okay. but i'll fix

02:07:512 (1,2) - stack them like you did before okay

[Light Extra]
01:23:824 (2) - stack it xd okay

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - ye maybe u liek those patterns but it gives no emphasis by movment, i'd rather do smth more straight okay

01:31:512 (5) - 2 circles for those 2 claps emphasis? there is no clap here, isn't it?

really cool diff waow! Thanks!

[]
GL Thanks!

[-Crissaegrim-] wrote:

Hey o/ from Q
This is hard to mod :(

Ex
Ex


is this an extra?

00:07:887 (2) - i think you could make it just a normal slider and 00:08:637 - this clickable, it could fit better since music is getting higher on this point It still in calm section so it shouldn't make a normal slider here. And I won't add a circle at 00:08:637, It would lack the flow.

00:09:012 (3) - maybe make SV a bit higher, the same reason as above ^

00:15:762 (1) - lower SV could be nice isn't 0.35x kinda slow right now?

00:26:637 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe distance this a bit more okay

00:29:262 (3,4,5,6,7) - you could play a bit with volume here, try raising it a bit matching the song, just a personal suggestion I might make it, but If i do then I have to do with other diffs and other parts that has the same rhythm too. Let me ask with GDer first.

00:39:012 (1) - i think this should be more distanced from last note, vocals have a little spike here I keep the DS here

00:44:449 (3) - imo a circle fits better 00:44:824 - here, slider into circle Make something similar

00:54:762 (3,4) - i think these two are too lineal compared to the rest of the section, talking about the pattern, maybe play a bit with 2nd slider so it doesn't
stay the same as first one? idk if i explained myself well sorry okay

00:58:137 (7) - maybe lower SV a bit? adding some contrast and reflecting vocals, only for this slider okay

01:04:512 (4,5) - you could do the same as 01:03:012 (1,2) - here maybe? okay

01:08:262 (7,1) - the same here but maybe move so it overlaps the same way I think stacking here isn't a big problem.

01:12:012 (1) - i think you can fix blanket okay

01:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - Beautiful Thanks!

01:19:324 (4,1) - maybe you could stick to the same movement you used before, this is more spiky than last ones well, i think it's okay

01:19:512 (1,2,3) - i think these should have more distance since you put some big intensity on hitsounds so i'll ctrl+g those

01:22:887 (1,2,3,4) - imo these should be 2 1/4 sliders instead of a stream because of the piano change, but this is pretty personal, just a choice the piano sound is the same with the previous one so i think it shouldn't do that.

01:23:637 (4) - hm you emphasized a lot this slider tail, probably a circle fits better okay

01:25:699 (1,2,1) - nice D, maybe lower tails volume a bit, it can be distracting somehow okay

01:33:199 (2,3) - this should be a slider imo, piano starts 01:33:387 (4) - okay

01:36:012 (1) - you could try to put this closer to last slider, i think this jump is a bit out of the map since you don't use it, just here I think it's okay to leave it.

02:03:387 - you miss some sounds, i think you just decided to map vocals but i'll still point it well, i think it's okay

02:07:324 (8,1) - maybe stack them? as you did 02:08:824 (3,4) - here and later fix from sotarks' mod already
Light Extra
Light Extra


00:22:887 (2) - maybe make it blanket or do the same as you did before blanket is bad idea here

00:30:012 (1,3) - don't make them touch maybe k

00:32:918 - i think this is more noticeable so it should be mapped imo k

00:40:512 (1) - i think this looks a bit meh for this section, maybe try not to make it that curvy what does meh mean? xD

00:50:824 (4) - this isn't necessary k

00:51:762 (3,1) - you could make a better blanket POTASSIUM

00:57:574 (1) - i think this should have more distance because intensity POTASSIUM
01:15:012 (1) - ^ i think it's okay here

01:17:262 (1,1) - i think this looks messy, try to change 2nd slider, maybe different shape or move it i think it's okay here, i think it's kinda nice btw

01:18:012 (1) - hm i think this spike is too big for the map overall ????

01:20:887 (2,3,4) - this isn't necessary at all, on an extra maybe, i think you should just put two 1/4 circles instead of this POTASSIUM


This song is so good, nice map Thanks!
Good Luck! Thanks!
Lemme update this first then i'll reply payday's mod later
posted
Sorry for late reply, I took a shower and made my breakfast then.

paydayzcool wrote:

Hi there from t/579994, NM as promised,

I like the map, just a few suggestions.
Normal
01:04:512 (3) - This note seems too close to 01:03:012 (1). I reckon you should move it further away. That's okay
01:31:137 (2,3) - I think you should have the 3 blanket 01:30:012 (1) by moving the 2 a little further down. https://puu.sh/vghGY/e14a1a0d1b.png Isn't it blanket already?
Hard
00:32:262 (3) - Doesn't change the map a lot, but it does look nicer: https://puu.sh/vghV2/394c9f6da3.png okay
02:15:762 (7,1) - Blanket these notes? okay


Light insane diff is very well done. I can't see anything to improve.

Insane
01:18:387 (2,3) - Blanket these two sliders?okay


All the others diffs are good. Sorry if my suggestions weren't helpful, I tried my best. At least your helping is useful for me :D Thanks a lot!
posted
this is nice
i'd turn of skin whenever playing because the colours are too dark for me, could increase brightness for more people to play with colours
00:17:027 (1) - Lack of hitsound imo, should use whistle as well because keysound isn’t enough here

Insane
01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - This actually flowed really well, you could potentially use it on the other diffs too since it’s something memorable
01:35:637 (1) - Bit of a combo breaker due to high spacing + SV

Boatkrab
00:17:027 (3) - A lot more readable with the suggestion i put in top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png
00:47:074 (3,4) - Not really sightreadable since use used the exact same spacing on a 1/2 before
01:16:512 (5,1) - Can you unstack these, in the previous section you established that overlap = 1/2, but this breaks it. You need to unstack it so that the stream can be read as 1/4
good diff

Light Extra
this is the diff that I would normally play, more things about distances here
00:17:027 (1) - Just position this a little closer, clicked too late
00:27:574 (2) - this flows better if moved a bit to the right, bit too far in the corner
00:32:074 (2,3) - flow from 2 to 3 would be slightly better if 3 was moved up, so that it lines up better. could move 2 down or other things instead
01:09:762 (3,4,1) - could probably make a better triangle with these
01:15:762 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow too well here, angle is really wide. minor improvement but could ctrl-j 1, better visual flow with next pattern
01:16:887 (2,1,1) - flow is really killed here, here's a silly fix, try it maybe https://puu.sh/vgo9c/ac84b469b9.png (although kinda silly)
01:18:949 (4,1) - this jump should not be this big, no sound on it
01:20:262 (1,1) - Hard to read because the head of the slider here is hiding behind 01:20:074 (2) - ,
01:22:324 (6) - I get that it's an important part to emphasise, but it might be too jumpy in this general area. 6 would be a lot better if it was closer to the stream
01:29:074 (2,1) - can you make this jump a bit smaller
01:29:449 (2) - drawing from pishi's newest video, this one has a clear kick on both head and tail, should make a triple for music
01:40:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - should be a little closer since not as intense imo, but opinion
02:16:512 (1) - this section DS increases compared to the previous?? should really change

Extra
00:01:512 (1) - Slider head/reverse/tail don’t really make sense, higher pitched violins should be clickable here. 1/1 sliders would suit more. There’s potential gimmicks you could play with SV here too if you did it, low sv on 00:01:512 (1) - and higher on 00:02:262 (2) - would match pitch changes well
00:17:027 (3) - Could potentially do this since it’s the top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png
00:48:387 (2,3) - would be better if you ctrl-g for spacing emphasis + would make flow angles on 2 and 3 the same (they’re different angle = different emphasis right now) but you don’t the snare too often so idk
01:19:324 (4,1) - doesn’t flow too well, even for emphasis. 1 should at least be a little more to the right of the head of 1
01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here
01:22:137 (5,1,1) - Really breaks circular flow here, the stream should be going clockwise to follow flow
01:22:793 (4,1) - Could add more emphasis here
posted

Sinnoh wrote:

this is nice
i'd turn of skin whenever playing because the colours are too dark for me, could increase brightness for more people to play with colours i think it's kinda okay, not too dark for me xd
00:17:027 (1) - Lack of hitsound imo, should use whistle as well because keysound isn’t enough here wtf when did i changed this?

Insane
01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - This actually flowed really well, you could potentially use it on the other diffs too since it’s something memorable xd
01:35:637 (1) - Bit of a combo breaker due to high spacing + SV Really? I think it's not a problem. but i fixed the spacing :D

Light Extra
this is the diff that I would normally play, more things about distances here
00:17:027 (1) - Just position this a little closer, clicked too late i think that's okay, but i may try to move (2) a little bit closer
00:27:574 (2) - this flows better if moved a bit to the right, bit too far in the corner i'll try
00:32:074 (2,3) - flow from 2 to 3 would be slightly better if 3 was moved up, so that it lines up better. could move 2 down or other things instead well, i tried to move (2) instead since i can't move (3) cuz it'll affect to DS
01:09:762 (3,4,1) - could probably make a better triangle with these I didn't intend to make a triangle here. I tried to make (3)'s slider blanket with (1)
01:15:762 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow too well here, angle is really wide. minor improvement but could ctrl-j 1, better visual flow with next pattern not look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1,1) - flow is really killed here, here's a silly fix, try it maybe https://puu.sh/vgo9c/ac84b469b9.png (although kinda silly) I intead make something similiar to this. ;)
01:18:949 (4,1) - this jump should not be this big, no sound on it idk where should i put here ;;
01:20:262 (1,1) - Hard to read because the head of the slider here is hiding behind 01:20:074 (2) - , I thin it's not a big problem and i think it's playable, but i'll stack (1)'s slider-tail to (1).
01:22:324 (6) - I get that it's an important part to emphasise, but it might be too jumpy in this general area. 6 would be a lot better if it was closer to the stream k
01:29:074 (2,1) - can you make this jump a bit smaller I'm afraid i can't (no explain sry cuz hard to explain)
01:29:449 (2) - drawing from pishi's newest video, this one has a clear kick on both head and tail, should make a triple for music imo leave it as a slider-kick also okay too
01:40:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - should be a little closer since not as intense imo, but opinion I think it's kinda near xd
02:16:512 (1) - this section DS increases compared to the previous?? should really change K

ExtraLiberation
00:01:512 (1) - Slider head/reverse/tail don’t really make sense, higher pitched violins should be clickable here. 1/1 sliders would suit more. There’s potential gimmicks you could play with SV here too if you did it, low sv on 00:01:512 (1) - and higher on 00:02:262 (2) - would match pitch changes well K
00:17:027 (3) - Could potentially do this since it’s the top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I think i'll make somethink as boat's diff does.
00:48:387 (2,3) - would be better if you ctrl-g for spacing emphasis + would make flow angles on 2 and 3 the same (they’re different angle = different emphasis right now) but you don’t the snare too often so idk idk this looks bad for me and i wanna keep ds here too so. .-.
01:19:324 (4,1) - doesn’t flow too well, even for emphasis. 1 should at least be a little more to the right of the head of 1 holy. i'll make a new one now ;w;
01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
01:22:137 (5,1,1) - Really breaks circular flow here, the stream should be going clockwise to follow flow POTASSIUM K
01:22:793 (4,1) - Could add more emphasis here no. i thin it's all the same so it don't need to emphasize imo.
SB are fuck. Kill me when they are finish :)
posted
Sotarks's Stuff

Sotarks wrote:

[BoatKrab]
00:48:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ok your insane diff has the most complexe rythmn and density here compared to those extras lol, and how the fuck you hear constant 1/2 beats here xd yeaaa please don't use such jumps section for such a calm part..
but yeah otherwise it's pretty good structure here and aesthetics XD pls nerfffff
:V nerf for a bit

01:41:449 (1) - this is so damn hard to read!! well, I added 01:41:355 (5) - and NC at 01:41:449 (1) - for more readable already
Sinnoh

Sinnoh wrote:

Boatkrab
00:17:027 (3) - A lot more readable with the suggestion i put in top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I decide to reduce their DS, must be fine now ;w;
00:47:074 (3,4) - Not really sightreadable since use used the exact same spacing on a 1/2 before where???!
01:16:512 (5,1) - Can you unstack these, in the previous section you established that overlap = 1/2, but this breaks it. You need to unstack it so that the stream can be read as 1/4
good diff Thx :3


Thanks for mods :3
posted
@boatkrab what I meant, same ds but different rhythm
https://puu.sh/vgzab/e25a70bb96.png

@frontier 01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
unsure what happened, but I think there was a 4x repeat slider before. may have selected wrong thingy
posted
may not answer all replies since i have irl stuff to do due it's songkran festival here :D
posted
o/ Here's your mod

Not gonna lie, this is a great mapset and tbh I can't find much to work with as there's like 30secs of it being intensive with the rest being really straightforward and like 2* in difficulty lol, just a few overlaps that bothered me for the most part. So all of these are just suggestions as I haven't found anything 'wrong' with any of the difficulties really...
So if you feel I'm nitpicking, that's because the map is just this good.

Liberation:
SPOILER
01:24:574 (5) - could move this somewhere else, feels too close to the triple
01:40:887 (3) - either stack it with reverse slider or move 01:40:887 (3) - a bit to the left so the overlaps are the same
01:53:637 (3,4) and 02:11:262 (3,5) - I don't think these overlaps are necessary.


Light Extra:
SPOILER
00:20:637 (4,1) - I don't think overlaps like this look good, especially when you do a different kind of overlap here 00:25:137 (4,1) .
00:51:762 (3,1) - Space them a bit so they don't overlap, the vocals get a bit more intensive here as well so it won't screw your emphasis.
01:04:137 (3,1) - Stuff like this, you're only using it here from what I can see, unless all these weird overlaps are your motif for this map, I'd recommend getting rid of them. Up to you~
01:16:887 (2,1) - another one
01:39:574 (4) - I'd move it to x:228 y24 so the follow points go right through 01:39:012 (1) 's center.
01:57:012 (3) - move to x:28 y:326 so overlaps are the same on all 3 sliders


BoatKrab's Insane:
SPOILER
00:21:762 (3,4,1,2) & 00:28:512 (1,2) - Make these overlaps the same
00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like this part, would go with something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7805426 , it's a more natural jump imo
01:21:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Make it smoother maybe?
01:57:012 (3) - I'd go with a bit more curved slider here.
02:17:074 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NCs like here 02:19:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1)


Insane:
SPOILER
02:08:262 (2,5) - make these overlaps the same, and that's pretty much it... can't find anything in this diff


Lost's Light Insane:
SPOILER
00:45:012 (4) - move a bit up so the sliders don't touch
01:02:262 (3,4) - Think it'll be better if you make these a mirror of 01:00:762 (3,4), it follows the pattern afterwards too
01:53:637 (3) - slightly down so the sliders don't touch
01:59:637 (3,4) - ^



Normal:
SPOILER
00:34:605 (1) - I think extending this spinner to 00:36:762 works better maybe?
01:41:262 (5) - maybe place another reverse slider starting on red here instead so it follows the music better?


Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked.
Please sign in to reply.