forum

Nardis - Cosmo Memory

posted
Total Posts
6
Topic Starter
Hikomori
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
lcfc
hell yea
xLolicore-
YHEA ME 2 IM GYA
Topic Starter
Hikomori
whoops
Sadistic Potato
offset should be around 34

[PRESTISSIMO]
00:30:186 (1) - 00:35:329 (5) - should be different because they represent different things, the first one is more of like impact and the second one is "slowing down", so I think the SV of the second one should be lowered

00:38:415 (1,2) - maybe consider making it like 00:36:700 (1,2,1) - (because 00:35:672 (1,2) - -> 00:36:700 (1,2) - , so 00:36:700 (1,2) - -> 00:38:415 (1,2) but swapped)

00:49:386 (1,2) - these don't go well (at least for the first time) if they're the same combo because such short spaced 00:49:386 (1,2,3) - will make player think of triple-tapping instead of stopping at the first note. However, 01:38:757 (1,2,3,1) - is okay
(same case with 01:00:357 (1,2) - but this time, player will have a mixed feeling about double-tapping/triple-tapping the sliders)

00:54:957 (1,2,3) - using 01:05:500 (4,5,6) -, 01:38:929 (2,3,1) - imo is better

01:28:129 (5,1,2) - this can mislead some player into thinking that they should nah nevermind i think this is fine (I had trouble in HR though)

01:46:643 (1,2,3) - since it already had a "buildup" (01:45:615 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ), would be nice if the distance of 01:46:643 (1,2,3) - is more wide (make it move faster), and then ctrl + g 01:46:986 (4) - and move it up a little bit

02:06:529 - until 02:06:872 (4) - these sould be like 02:00:357 (3,4,5,6,1) -

Good luck :)!
Topic Starter
Hikomori

Sadistic Potato wrote:

offset should be around 34 its a fade-in (also offset is from stjpa's ranked set)

[PRESTISSIMO]
00:30:186 (1) - 00:35:329 (5) - should be different because they represent different things, the first one is more of like impact and the second one is "slowing down", so I think the SV of the second one should be lowered its is a flash sound so ill keep it until someone mentions this again

00:38:415 (1,2) - maybe consider making it like 00:36:700 (1,2,1) - (because 00:35:672 (1,2) - -> 00:36:700 (1,2) - , so 00:36:700 (1,2) - -> 00:38:415 (1,2) but swapped) nah

00:49:386 (1,2) - these don't go well (at least for the first time) if they're the same combo because such short spaced 00:49:386 (1,2,3) - will make player think of triple-tapping instead of stopping at the first note. However, 01:38:757 (1,2,3,1) - is okay
(same case with 01:00:357 (1,2) - but this time, player will have a mixed feeling about double-tapping/triple-tapping the sliders) so truu

00:54:957 (1,2,3) - using 01:05:500 (4,5,6) -, 01:38:929 (2,3,1) - imo is better this happens on Stjpa's ranked set (its an extra diff tho)

01:28:129 (5,1,2) - this can mislead some player into thinking that they should nah nevermind i think this is fine (I had trouble in HR though) so truu

01:46:643 (1,2,3) - since it already had a "buildup" (01:45:615 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ), would be nice if the distance of 01:46:643 (1,2,3) - is more wide (make it move faster), and then ctrl + g 01:46:986 (4) - and move it up a little bit it would break conection if i ctrl g 01:46:986 (4) - with 01:47:329 (1) - but i spaced the stream

02:06:529 - until 02:06:872 (4) - these sould be like 02:00:357 (3,4,5,6,1) - nah

Good luck :)!
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply