stupid cable company being dumb
don't forget to eat him for that extra proteinabraker wrote:
: he's dead. I need to start buying spares.
How much do your eat?Blitzfrog wrote:
Abraker I'll be your hamster :^)
I don't think you want to eat anything that has died from natural causes.FrozenMilkshake wrote:
don't forget to eat him for that extra proteinabraker wrote:
: he's dead. I need to start buying spares.
Being worked to death is not natural.abraker wrote:
I don't think you want to eat anything that has died from natural causes.
pfft, so is dying at the dinner table after eating a dead hamsterjohnmedina999 wrote:
Being worked to death is not natural.abraker wrote:
I don't think you want to eat anything that has died from natural causes.
levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi
Blitzfrog wrote:
levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi
https://new.ppy.sh/forum/t/58743levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi
linking to the new forums is not okay.johnmedina999 wrote:
https://new.ppy.sh/forum/t/58743levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi
That's the only version the thread is in, though.kai99 wrote:
linking to the new forums is not okay.
Ephemeral wrote:
never approve this thread.
it can be the silent valhalla that only we know about.
lybydose you fucking legend
This isn't really a paradox as there isn't a loop that causes incongruity. I would deem this more of a nonsensical statement.johnmedina999 wrote:
https://new.ppy.sh/forum/t/58743levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi
You're right, a better example would be "google how to fix wifi" (ignoring the fact that mobile data exists).Kisses wrote:
This isn't really a paradox as there isn't a loop that causes incongruity. I would deem this more of a nonsensical statement.
levesterz wrote:
who need wifi when you can google for wifi