forum

HO-KAGO TEA TIME - Kira Kira Days

posted
Total Posts
9
Topic Starter
MBmasher
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 8:33:57 AM

Artist: HO-KAGO TEA TIME
Title: Kira Kira Days
Source: けいおん!!
Tags: after school keion miracle k-on yui hirasawa 平沢 唯 toyosaki aki 豊崎 愛生 mio akiyama 秋山 澪 ritsu tainaka 田井中 律 azusa nakano 中野 梓 tsumugi mugi kotobuki 琴吹 紬 歌うよ うたうよ ミラクル
BPM: 200
Filesize: 7237kb
Play Time: 03:31
Difficulties Available:
  1. Advanced (2.42 stars, 427 notes)
  2. Easy (1.23 stars, 31 notes)
  3. Light Insane (0 stars, 1 notes)
  4. Utauyo!! (6.2 stars, 863 notes)
Download: HO-KAGO TEA TIME - Kira Kira Days
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
K-ON! in 2017 LUL

DEAD MAPSET

Easy || 10% || By MBmasher

Advanced || 100% || By MBmasher

Light Insane || 0% remapping || By MBmasher

Insane || 0% || OPEN FOR GD

Utauyo!! || 100% || By MBmasher
Aurele
are you planning on ranking this?
Topic Starter
MBmasher
I will try

So basically yes
jas
dab from q mm4m4m4m4

asdf diff (hardest that you wanted me to mod or somethinfsdfsdf)


00:00:434 (1,1) - i would just stack these because it signifies that this is a full beat gap

00:01:634 (4,2) - I would stack these, it looks better visually

00:02:084 (2) - make the slider the same angle as 00:01:784 (1) - for visual purposes

00:02:534 (4,5,6,7) - these jumps are awkward, I would consider spacing them out and changing the pattern like this

00:03:434 (2) - ctrl+g for circular flow

00:04:184 (1,2) - these objects are too close for the spacing you already have

00:10:034 (1) - remove nc

00:05:084 (5,6) - the spacing here is small when 6 is a strong sound

00:10:934 (4,5) - ^ but with 5 being the strong sound

00:11:534 (1) - ctrl g because movement would be really weird and stuff when people play, would also stack reverse part on the head of 00:10:934 (4) - slider

00:11:984 (2) - would stack on 00:11:234 (5) -

00:12:134 (3) - ctrl g because movement would be really weird and stuff when people play

00:15:134 (1) - this slider should be like other sliders xd not at this weird angle, make it like 00:15:434 (2) -

00:16:934 (5,6) - decrease spacing, the vocal is too quiet to emphasize

00:17:384 (6,1) - increase spacing because of downbeat and strong sound

00:17:834 (2) - make the same angle as 00:17:534 (1) - and i personally would ctrl j that

00:18:434 (4,1) - would increase spacing because of the guitar

00:18:884 (2) - ctrl c, ctrl v, ctrl j, and ctrl g of 00:18:584 (1) - , it would look way better

00:20:234 (3,3) - i would make these the same curve

00:27:134 (1,2) - why are these slider anchored? there isnt really a sound here that supports this slider shape, you should just make them curves

00:27:734 (3,4,5) - the jumps here are linear and awkward, how about placing the pattern like this

00:29:684 (1) - you should make the slider imply that it's actually going to 00:30:134 (2) -

00:30:734 (1,2,3,4) - same concept as the 4th thing i said

00:31:934 (1,2,3) - you mapped these like they were the same sounds, change some things around so they actually emphasize the voices better

00:34:634 (2) - would make this jumps since there is a strong vocal sound on the red tick, sort of like 00:36:434 (4,5) - but with less spacing

00:36:434 (4,5) - decrease spacing

00:37:034 (2) - would make this jumps since there is a strong vocal sound on the red tick

00:43:934 (1,2) - would space out as people might think that this is a 1/4 instead of 1/2

00:45:134 (1,2) - ^

00:55:034 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider

00:57:434 (3,5) - ^

00:57:734 (4,5) - these 2 sliders are on weird noises, so you should make them different

00:58:934 (3) - i would make this in 2 circles because its a 2 syllable word or whatever

01:01:334 (3,4,5,6) - same concept as the 4th thing i said

01:03:134 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) -

01:04:634 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider

01:05:534 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) -

01:07:034 (3) - i would make this in 2 circles because its a 2 syllable word or whatever

01:07:034 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider. considering I now see you repeat this in the maps, this is the last one for this problem, this suggestion applies for all the other ones of this pattern. ah maybe it is rankable then. becuase its a pattern. idk, you should just ask a bn or somehting if this is rankable

01:18:584 (6,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead

01:18:884 (1,2,3,4) - nice difficulty spike xd

01:19:334 (4,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead

01:58:334 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) -

01:59:834 (3) - I would stack the end of this slider tail on the end of 01:59:234 (4) -

02:06:584 (6,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead

02:06:884 (1,2) - people might read this as a 1/1 stack, not 1/2 stack, you should just make them into jumps

02:13:934 (1,2) - this is just one long sound, why is there a slider and a circle. just make it into 1 slider

02:23:384 (5,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead

02:23:684 (1,2,3,4) - nice difficulty spike xd

02:24:134 (4,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead

02:25:784 (4,1) - people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps

02:26:234 (1,1,1) - people would probably read the constant nc's as 3/4's or 1/3's since it's used that way in most maps, just remove nc for the 2nd and 3rd one

02:27:734 (3,1) - people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps

02:28:484 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - nice difficulty spike xd

02:29:534 (1) - this could blanket 02:29:084 (5,6,7) - better

02:36:734 (1,2,3,4) - why does this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) - , they arent the same noises

02:40:334 (1) - stack on the reverse arrow of 02:39:134 (1) - and then allign 02:39:934 (1) - with it

02:40:409 (1) - you should just silence the of this spinner

02:46:334 (1,2,1,2) - these both follow the same concept as "people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps"

03:32:009 (1) - you should silence the end of this

end

wow cool gl with rank!
Topic Starter
MBmasher

CraEZy wrote:

dab from q mm4m4m4m4

asdf diff (hardest that you wanted me to mod or somethinfsdfsdf)


00:00:434 (1,1) - i would just stack these because it signifies that this is a full beat gap ok

00:01:634 (4,2) - I would stack these, it looks better visually ok

00:02:084 (2) - make the slider the same angle as 00:01:784 (1) - for visual purposes ok

00:02:534 (4,5,6,7) - these jumps are awkward, I would consider spacing them out and changing the pattern like this ok

00:03:434 (2) - ctrl+g for circular flow ok

00:04:184 (1,2) - these objects are too close for the spacing you already have ok

00:10:034 (1) - remove nc ok

00:05:084 (5,6) - the spacing here is small when 6 is a strong sound ok

00:10:934 (4,5) - ^ but with 5 being the strong sound ok

00:11:534 (1) - ctrl g because movement would be really weird and stuff when people play, would also stack reverse part on the head of 00:10:934 (4) - slider ok

00:11:984 (2) - would stack on 00:11:234 (5) - ok

00:12:134 (3) - ctrl g because movement would be really weird and stuff when people play ok

00:15:134 (1) - this slider should be like other sliders xd not at this weird angle, make it like 00:15:434 (2) - ok

00:16:934 (5,6) - decrease spacing, the vocal is too quiet to emphasize ok

00:17:384 (6,1) - increase spacing because of downbeat and strong sound ok

00:17:834 (2) - make the same angle as 00:17:534 (1) - and i personally would ctrl j that did the first part but not the second

00:18:434 (4,1) - would increase spacing because of the guitar looks fine to me

00:18:884 (2) - ctrl c, ctrl v, ctrl j, and ctrl g of 00:18:584 (1) - , it would look way better ok

00:20:234 (3,3) - i would make these the same curve did it but did a ctrl j also

00:27:134 (1,2) - why are these slider anchored? there isnt really a sound here that supports this slider shape, you should just make them curves ok

00:27:734 (3,4,5) - the jumps here are linear and awkward, how about placing the pattern like this ok

00:29:684 (1) - you should make the slider imply that it's actually going to 00:30:134 (2) - ok

00:30:734 (1,2,3,4) - same concept as the 4th thing i said this one looks fine to me, i only changed the last one because it had an awkward transition to the next notes

00:31:934 (1,2,3) - you mapped these like they were the same sounds, change some things around so they actually emphasize the voices better curved the slider

00:34:634 (2) - would make this jumps since there is a strong vocal sound on the red tick, sort of like 00:36:434 (4,5) - but with less spacing ok

00:36:434 (4,5) - decrease spacing i just made it a slider

00:37:034 (2) - would make this jumps since there is a strong vocal sound on the red tick ok

00:43:934 (1,2) - would space out as people might think that this is a 1/4 instead of 1/2 ok

00:45:134 (1,2) - ^

00:55:034 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider Burai slider is ONE slider that overlaps itself,
these are just stacked sliders. its rankable probably


00:57:434 (3,5) - ^

00:57:734 (4,5) - these 2 sliders are on weird noises, so you should make them different ok

00:58:934 (3) - i would make this in 2 circles because its a 2 syllable word or whatever ok

01:01:334 (3,4,5,6) - same concept as the 4th thing i said said this before somewhere

01:03:134 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) - ok

01:04:634 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider said this before

01:05:534 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) - ok

01:07:034 (3) - i would make this in 2 circles because its a 2 syllable word or whatever im not mapping to the vocals here

01:07:034 (3,5) - preeeety sure this is unrankable as (i think) it can classify as a burai slider. considering I now see you repeat this in the maps, this is the last one for this problem, this suggestion applies for all the other ones of this pattern. ah maybe it is rankable then. becuase its a pattern. idk, you should just ask a bn or somehting if this is rankable said this before too

01:18:584 (6,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead ok

01:18:884 (1,2,3,4) - nice difficulty spike xd thanks!

01:19:334 (4,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead ok

01:58:334 (1,2,3,4) - why doesnt this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) - ok

01:59:834 (3) - I would stack the end of this slider tail on the end of 01:59:234 (4) - except you just made me change it

02:06:584 (6,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead ok

02:06:884 (1,2) - people might read this as a 1/1 stack, not 1/2 stack, you should just make them into jumps ok

02:13:934 (1,2) - this is just one long sound, why is there a slider and a circle. just make it into 1 slider ok

02:23:384 (5,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead ok

02:23:684 (1,2,3,4) - nice difficulty spike xd thanks!!

02:24:134 (4,1) - people would probably read this as a 1/2 jump, not 1/1, you should stack it instead ok

02:25:784 (4,1) - people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps ok

02:26:234 (1,1,1) - people would probably read the constant nc's as 3/4's or 1/3's since it's used that way in most maps, just remove nc for the 2nd and 3rd one ok

02:27:734 (3,1) - people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps ok

02:28:484 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - nice difficulty spike xd thanks!!11!1!!!1

02:29:534 (1) - this could blanket 02:29:084 (5,6,7) - better ok

02:36:734 (1,2,3,4) - why does this follow the same pattern as 00:53:534 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:55:934 (1,2,3,4) - , they arent the same noises ok

02:40:334 (1) - stack on the reverse arrow of 02:39:134 (1) - and then allign 02:39:934 (1) - with it ok

02:40:409 (1) - you should just silence the of this spinner ok

02:46:334 (1,2,1,2) - these both follow the same concept as "people could interpret this as 1/4, space it out like the other 1/2 gaps" ok

03:32:009 (1) - you should silence the end of this i moved it back 1/4 where there's a guitar sound

end

wow cool gl with rank! thanks for the mod!!!!
Lefia
Hi from my queue

mod
[General]
  1. Disable Countdown
  2. Disable Widescreen Support
[Normal]
Too much overlap in this diff, you should fix it and please increase the DS in this diff, normal diff shouldn't be like this
(I won't mention about overlap, so please fix it by ur self (sorry))
Slider Velocity is too low, 0.8 is used to easy diff, change it into 1.0 or 1.1

00:12:584 it'll better if you add circle here to follow the vocal
00:12:734 (1) Used 2/1 slider with reverse here is a bad idea, you must make 00:13:784 here clickable , or maybe like this // same with 01:31:934 (1) - 01:36:734 (1)
00:18:734 (1) not very good, don't leave 00:18:384 alone, because the vocal & guitar have emphasis here, how about like this?
00:28:934 (3) if you want follow the guitar's sound (?) you should use 1/1 slider from here 00:28:784
00:30:734 (3) why you don't use 1 1/2 slider here since the strong beat is here 00:31:184 , used 2/1 slider with reverse isn't suitable with the song
00:52:184 (4) if you used 1/2 slider here 00:50:834 to followed the vocal, why you didn't used 1/2 slider here? // same with 01:56:984 (4) - 02:54:584 (4)
00:54:734 (1,2) i think you shouldn't leave 00:55:184, not only that, i think it'll works better if you change the (2) with two 1/2 slider, like this? // same with 00:57:134 (1,2) - 01:04:334 (1,2) - 01:06:734 (1,2) - 01:59:534 (1,2) - 02:01:934 (1,2) - and more
00:01:934 add circle here and NC
01:17:534 (1,2) it'll works better if you put (2) to 01:17:984 to follow the vocal since the vocal have a strong emphasis than here 01:18:134 , like this // same with 02:22:334 (1,2) - 03:19:934 (1,2)
01:19:634 (1) remove NC
01:51:734 (2) it'll works better if you use 1/2 slider with reverse here to follow the vocal // same with 02:49:334 (2)
01:52:784 add circle here?
02:24:734 (1) it'll works better if you make like this because 02:25:784 must be clickable // same with 02:27:134
02:29:534 (1) nice slider, but the slider must end at 02:30:584 and continue it with circle

[Utauyo]
Too much part that need to make jump
increase slider velocity to 1.8

00:01:184 (2,3) i don't know your reason to make it stack, it'll works better if you make jump to (3) because there's a strong beat at (3)
00:01:634 (4,1) increase DS (4) to (1) to make jump & emphasis
00:01:784 (1,2) it'll works better if you change it with 3/4 slider and 1/2 slider, because the guitar's sound (?) continue to 00:02:084 // same with 00:04:184 (1,2) - 00:06:584 (1,2)
00:02:834 (6,7) it'll works better if you use 1/2 slider because (7) isn't very strong at all // same with 00:05:234 (6,7)
00:03:134 (1) ctrl + g for better flow and why you didn't used 1/2 slider with reverse here? since you use it before 00:00:734 , i think 1/2 slider with reverse will works better
00:04:034 (4) if you reject my mod before, how about you make this circle blanket with slider (2) ?
00:05:384 (7,1) if you reject my mod, then make it blanket
00:07:934 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) it'll works better if you use circle here
00:09:284 (1,2) how about you use 1/2 slider and circle, then make the circle stack with (2)
00:10:034 (4) please use 3/4 slider to give it more emphasis // same with 00:19:634 (5)
00:10:784 (3,4) make it jump to get more emphasis // same with 00:14:984 (5,1) - 00:16:184 (5,1)
00:12:734 (1,2,3) if you tried to followed the vocal here, you should use 3/4 slider, it's more effective than 1/2 slider // same with 00:17:534 (1,2,3)

i'll stop here (sorry)

Good luck~
Topic Starter
MBmasher

Lefia wrote:

Hi from my queue

mod
[General]
  1. Disable Countdown
  2. Disable Widescreen Support
[Normal]
Too much overlap in this diff, you should fix it and please increase the DS in this diff, normal diff shouldn't be like this
(I won't mention about overlap, so please fix it by ur self (sorry))
Slider Velocity is too low, 0.8 is used to easy diff, change it into 1.0 or 1.1

00:12:584 it'll better if you add circle here to follow the vocal
00:12:734 (1) Used 2/1 slider with reverse here is a bad idea, you must make 00:13:784 here clickable , or maybe like this // same with 01:31:934 (1) - 01:36:734 (1)
00:18:734 (1) not very good, don't leave 00:18:384 alone, because the vocal & guitar have emphasis here, how about like this?
00:28:934 (3) if you want follow the guitar's sound (?) you should use 1/1 slider from here 00:28:784
00:30:734 (3) why you don't use 1 1/2 slider here since the strong beat is here 00:31:184 , used 2/1 slider with reverse isn't suitable with the song
00:52:184 (4) if you used 1/2 slider here 00:50:834 to followed the vocal, why you didn't used 1/2 slider here? // same with 01:56:984 (4) - 02:54:584 (4)
00:54:734 (1,2) i think you shouldn't leave 00:55:184, not only that, i think it'll works better if you change the (2) with two 1/2 slider, like this? // same with 00:57:134 (1,2) - 01:04:334 (1,2) - 01:06:734 (1,2) - 01:59:534 (1,2) - 02:01:934 (1,2) - and more
00:01:934 add circle here and NC why?
01:17:534 (1,2) it'll works better if you put (2) to 01:17:984 to follow the vocal since the vocal have a strong emphasis than here 01:18:134 , like this // same with 02:22:334 (1,2) - 03:19:934 (1,2)
01:19:634 (1) remove NC
01:51:734 (2) it'll works better if you use 1/2 slider with reverse here to follow the vocal // same with 02:49:334 (2)
01:52:784 add circle here?
02:24:734 (1) it'll works better if you make like this because 02:25:784 must be clickable // same with 02:27:134
02:29:534 (1) nice slider, but the slider must end at 02:30:584 and continue it with circle

[Utauyo]
Too much part that need to make jump
increase slider velocity to 1.8 why?

00:01:184 (2,3) i don't know your reason to make it stack, it'll works better if you make jump to (3) because there's a strong beat at (3)
00:01:634 (4,1) increase DS (4) to (1) to make jump & emphasis
00:01:784 (1,2) it'll works better if you change it with 3/4 slider and 1/2 slider, because the guitar's sound (?) continue to 00:02:084 // same with 00:04:184 (1,2) - 00:06:584 (1,2)
00:02:834 (6,7) it'll works better if you use 1/2 slider because (7) isn't very strong at all // same with 00:05:234 (6,7) But how isn't it strong?
00:03:134 (1) ctrl + g for better flow and why you didn't used 1/2 slider with reverse here? since you use it before 00:00:734 , i think 1/2 slider with reverse will works better i did the CTRL+G but i wouldn't use a 1/2 slider with a reverse.
00:04:034 (4) if you reject my mod before, how about you make this circle blanket with slider (2) ?
00:05:384 (7,1) if you reject my mod, then make it blanket
00:07:934 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) it'll works better if you use circle here
00:09:284 (1,2) how about you use 1/2 slider and circle, then make the circle stack with (2)
00:10:034 (4) please use 3/4 slider to give it more emphasis // same with 00:19:634 (5) Why, the jump is already big and the sliderend lands on a sound anyway
00:10:784 (3,4) make it jump to get more emphasis // same with 00:14:984 (5,1) - 00:16:184 (5,1)
00:12:734 (1,2,3) if you tried to followed the vocal here, you should use 3/4 slider, it's more effective than 1/2 slider // same with 00:17:534 (1,2,3)

i'll stop here (sorry)

Good luck~ thanks for the mod!!! if i didn't reply to your mod, I fixed the problem
Shmiklak
Placeholder for a late mod
Topic Starter
MBmasher
Yeah sorry but the mapset is dead. Idk if this is fair but if you still want to follow through with the M4M mod this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/600818
Once again, sorry. If you don't want to mod then its fine
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply