[General]
- aimod in hard and medium fixed
- i assume you got metadata from somewhere from this btw. sounds ok to me, its also where i got my 4th kac meta as well but i might ask on metadata heap i think just for sure
else fine
[SPECIAL]
00:07:610 - it's not a problem but, any reason why you ended up phasing in the LNs despite the sound being present right from the start?
00:26:956 (26956|0,26956|3,27066|2,27175|1,27175|0,27285|2) - pattern here is behind a quite held out chime sound so it could make sense to have them more LN based over the typical jumpstream you have here e.g.
http://prntscr.com/jgpskl or likewise
agree. do it a lil different00:40:314 (40314|2,40423|3,40533|2) - more for flow, could move the trill here from completely on the right hand to having it between both, kinda like
http://prntscr.com/jgq3pu00:46:226 (46226|0,46226|1) - confused as to why this is a double LN, since the two below i assume have the vocals representing the extra LN when this one doesnt have an LN here. id personally just opt for having it as a single LN
00:54:091 (54091|2) - the 1/4th notes are covering the melody but theres no sound for the melody here, so should probably delete. could then have it flow into the next part with an LN like so
http://prntscr.com/jgq5vr maybe
mmh i think i heard something like a build-up melody alongside the main melody. guess i'll keep it for now01:13:714 (73714|1,73714|0) - i mean, since the reverb ends at around the blue tick i would've extended it to there and have it shield with the notes above (shouldn't flow bad since bpm is low)
i'd say i prefer this reverb to be unmapped. they're not so important thing to be mapped imo01:27:135 (87135|3,87135|1,87135|0,87135|2) - hmm, quads for a cymbal isnt something i can agree with. since the cymbal is barely audible here compared to the rest of the sounds, a quad probably places a bit too much emphasis on the sound there. id go for the triple which shows the cymbal effectively without so much emphasis
isnt the cymbal is actually loud? at least i think it is, hence the quad01:30:102 (90102|2,90102|3,90267|0,90267|1,90762|3,90926|0) - why'd you have these different? im sure the sounds are the same intensity so i would've had them either both as double LNs or both single LNs.
01:43:834 (103834|2,103834|0,103834|1,103834|3) - could be cool to have these as LNs and then have them end at 01:44:963 - progressively as the sounds fade, eg
http://prntscr.com/jgqatf i particularly like this kind of emphasizing rather than have them all LN. i think that captures the feelings more better02:10:975 - not particularly a fan of skipping the sound here, id suggest adding it since the sound is present here
02:15:917 (135917|0) - idk if you'd be up for it, but an idea would be to also make this an LN extending out after the existing one, and ending at 02:20:079 - where it begins to fade out? (that being said spread is a problem but /s)
[HARD]
00:54:091 (54091|2) - similar to top diff, im almost certain there isnt a note in the melody to support this
^00:59:947 (59947|0,59947|3,60153|3,60153|0) - i would actually prefer if these were a different pattern since [14] was used at 01:00:769 - for a difference sound so it'd help differentiate the two
01:21:531 - since theres more emphasis on this sound than on 01:21:778 (81778|0,81778|3) - , i would rearrange the objects similar to so
http://prntscr.com/jgs4em to give that emphasis
01:36:899 (96899|1,96899|2,97060|2,97060|3) - why'd you suddenly break consistency here? you seem to just have the 1/2 jumptrills for the kicks like these so it would make sense to keep consistent
01:43:834 (103834|2,103834|3,103834|0) - perhaps a similar suggestion to top diff here?
same as well02:02:738 - here, since the sounds are pretty muffled, i would overlap some of the LNs to represent that in a way
http://prntscr.com/jgs5cp , and then phase back into normal LNs as they because less muffled
02:12:969 (132969|1,133056|0,133143|2,133230|1,133316|0,133490|2,133663|0,133750|1,133837|2,133952|0,134068|1,134183|2,134299|1,134415|0,134530|2) - patterns here seems awfully left hand biased,
unless it was intended i'd try to balance it out a bit more
[MEDIUM]
01:26:476 (86476|3,86641|1,86806|3,86970|1,87135|3) - not a massive problem, but the transition into the double here is a bit uncomfortable due to this trill here
01:37:544 - i meannnnn, hard is full 1/2 rhythms here and you've just got the basic LN here. to aid with some sort of spread, you could add notes every 1/1 along with the LNs to close it slightly
01:43:834 (103834|3,103834|0) - yeah same suggestions here as well, but less complex
uhhh same01:57:536 (117536|2) - how about moving this to col 1? the [14] pattern will place more emphasis on the sound over the closed [12] like patterns and it would fit since the sound is more intense
[BASIC]
diff feels really distant spread wise from medium, but i guess its not a massive problem
yea its quite hard to maintain the layering in-between because the SR algorithm is meh xd and i really want this to be below 1.5* to be beginner friendly00:26:956 - how about adding an LN here for the chimes? like
http://prntscr.com/jgs8vv01:07:345 (67345|3,67756|1) - could be cool to have these overlap in cols [23] to give some differentiation between the more muffled LN below
01:43:834 (103834|1,103834|3) - yeah same here LNs aa
eeee tooo .3.02:02:738 (122738|1,123085|2) - maybe overlap these two as well?