Kamikaze wrote:

now the choruses
idk i don't really like how painfully simple they are, you are just putting kinda short LNs for the main background synths and that's ok I guess but like, the intro has harder patterning? ever since the fourth note of the map you had actually harder patterns than in the chorus except chorus is slightly harder to acc, for this kind of a song denser glut/jumpjack oriented patterning would be way more fun to play

Kamikaze wrote:

thank GOD this is modding v1 ok

played the mania diff, it's about what i would expect from an s3rl 4k chart, nothing out of ordinary, standard charting that's not my cup of tea, but it is what it is.

sightread cold hands no prior maps played, this is ss bait basically
i do have slight complaints though

first of all raise the hs volume by 5-10%, it's borderline acceptable now but better have it a bit higher for safety Make overall hitsounds to be 50%, quite audible imo then.


00:25:344 (25344|0,25498|1,25652|2,25806|3) - lol at stairs going up while pitch is going down, following too Rearranged

00:28:421 - i would rather do something like this to express the pitch going up down up down with gradual decrese:
Fixed

01:20:114 (80114|3,80267|3,80421|3,80575|3) - weird 4 note jack, the pause is longer between kicks but should you really extend the jack for that reason? i would just move the first note to 3 personally Fixed

01:24:729 (84729|2,84883|1,85037|3,85037|0) - and then you suddenly take all of the intensity and rigidity of the patterning to a 1/2 JS basically, it really feels like the hardest part of the map (at least until the longer 1/4 patterns) are the jacks in the first half of the build up and I don't like it personally ESPECIALLY since from this point onwards you have a constant 1/4 and even faster at times rhythm that you can utilize, but that would require having a higher difficulty admittedly Even though this is the next phase of the buildup, it does not necessarily mean that the next part should be definitely harder smh. However, I still added a few double notes to increase the difficulty and fixed the hitsounds here in both diffs.

01:32:729 - DoubleTime Farm Pattern (TM)
i really feel like you could just use a diffrent pattern that's not a one directional implied roll, anything that's not so straight forward would feel like a proper end of the build up tbh Rearranged

now the choruses
idk i don't really like how painfully simple they are, you are just putting kinda short LNs for the main background synths and that's ok I guess but like, the intro has harder patterning? ever since the fourth note of the map you had actually harder patterns than in the chorus except chorus is slightly harder to acc, for this kind of a song denser glut/jumpjack oriented patterning would be way more fun to play

How do I say. I am more into technical side so you can easily see my ideas throughout the chorus, I don't wanna add more notes tbh. But if you mean some rearrangements can be executed to increase the overall difficulty in the chorus and if they fit music as well, I would like to give it a try. Maybe find a time to talk on discord specifically about that :3

02:54:883 - this is the only time you do SVs like that and it feels really off having played the map up until this point without knowing about them, as literally nothing in the map hints at there being any jump SVs and also the SV itself being quite strong. this is actually the thing that annoyed me the most about this map btw, I REALLY suggest either removing the SV or just making it less intense so it's easier to sightread, ESPECIALLY in a map that simple

I don't wanna delete this cuz it will be too easy here. But I try to make the SVs easier by changing the values to 1.2x and 0.8x

ok that'd be about it, i rate the map s3/rl

call me back

Sanyi wrote:

Sorry for crashing the party but a new rule for catch difficulties in a hybrid set has been applied. The rule states that the lowest difficulty isn't allowed to be harder than a Platter, meaning you need a Platter. For more information: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/717962/start=0

Rule is active for 3 days now: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/6570100

You wouldn't need a Platter if there was a nomination before, but I didn't saw one. Did I miss it?

Ascendance wrote:

after confirmation of taiko and std, call me for a nomination

Nifty wrote:

here to mod the muzu

lmao I can't open this in MA so I guess no spread check, prob doesn't need it

00:33:344 (1) - you can maybe remove this since the piano ends there.
01:52:806 (4) - delete this because it's kind of uncomfortable as a muzukashii player to play two triples with a bit of space in between, weird as it may sound, and also I would wanna lower the intensity just a little bit before this kiai break.
02:23:806 - you could put a triple here to have intensity before the new section, and follows the snare pattern better.
02:29:037 - starting from here you stop following the vocals and it becomes quite ambiguous what you're mapping to. I would say to just keep mapping the vocal like you were in the first half of this section, since the only addition/change is the added snare on the beats 2 and 4 of every measure.
02:43:037 - you don't really need the break here (since you had oneright after the slider, and the 3/2 right after this time), so mapping a d here would fit in with the general rhythmic feel of the section and eliminate the sorta awkward break, which in turn would put more emphasis on the space left at 02:43:806 - .
03:28:883 - not quite sure this fits in the difficulty given the bpm and that it's at the end of quite a lengthy string of 1/2 spaces notes. I would suggest just deleting the middle note to avoid using that pattern.

nice sb

Skylish wrote:

Re-check after almost a year:

[General]

! Use N:C1 for the Taiko set so that taiko hitsounds are in effect

! Re-snap all notes after your fixations!

> Taiko K hitsound= https://puu.sh/A1GrL/fe3dd26cf6.rar Name it as taiko-normal-hitwhistle

> 00:24:729 - 85% is too loud even though the piano melody are in Forte. The drum hitsounds are too clear. Perhaps -20% for a better dynamic.

[Muzukashii]

> 00:33:344 - missed a note, the music does not really fade out completely at this timing so a note is still required

> 00:48:267 - shift it 1/2 forward (change to k) to match the vocal, display a change in general 2-4 note flow as well

> 00:57:652 - change to k, the alternation of pitch is clearly high

> 01:03:037 - remove this note since this 4 x 1/2 pattern break the consistency

! 01:05:344 - the breaking points of this section is unclear. Some cuts are on vocals/ virtuals/ instruments. Let's try: 01:05:344 (102) -

> 01:13:344 - Small suggestion on improving the flow: dkddk k k(3/2) Those vocal 'eh' should not be missed. I changed it in another way because I want to keep the 1/2. I think the 1/2 fits the vocal more well.

> 01:32:421 - kkk here, obvious triplet at the background. In addition 01:32:267 - can add an extra don

> 01:37:344 - / 01:42:267 - nnn n is smoother than n nnn. Leaving a triplet end sounds unfinished

> 01:48:421 - / 01:49:037 - similar case as above, but it even lacks consistency of usage of triplet at the latter. Try ddd d kkk k

! Check all kiais for the above issues

> 02:14:267 - another set of weird cutting of patterns, you may want them look like: 02:14:267 (1) -

> 02:19:190 - Then you can see the density spread is poor at the second repetitive section. You may just directly go on with C&P, and make some alteration at 3/2 part. A reminder that: 02:22:883 - you can do it with k k k d d kkk d, for a better flow again.

> 02:27:037 - k k d d for variation

! 02:45:037 - same 'cutting issue', fix it on your own

> 03:08:421 - / 03:12:114 - they should be fixed in the above, just a reminder here

> 03:29:652 - tripet for being consistent with 03:30:883 -

> 03:38:114 - shift it to 03:37:806 - to match the climax melody, I am not sure why you always have such weird cutting edges....

> 03:58:883 - It requires a dk style, same as 00:14:883 - , rearrange the patterns a bit, the density is fine.

Skylish wrote:

Re-check after almost a year:

[Nardo's Oni]

> 00:52:114 - the density spread was bad here until 00:54:267 - . The density just build up from nowhere and show less difference with Inner Oni. Usage of 5 x 1/4 may not be a wise choice. The build up from 00:44:421 to 00:54:267 - is natural enough in my opinion. I increased the note density at that spot in Inner Oni instead.

> 01:00:114 - / 01:00:421 - d k? It sounds and follows the note flow better Retained to follow the d k sequence every 4/1 starting from 00:55:498 (163) -

> 01:13:806 - let's say what if you want to strictly follow drum kick= constant k in this bar. Apply in Inner Oni as well I think the current constellation could accompany the drums and vocals accordingly.

[Nardo's Inner Oni]

> 01:59:037 - change it to k, the whole feeling of kddkddk does not seem match much... (and this is the only so called pp pattern in the whole Inner Oni, that looks weird enough) The mentioned pattern could differentiate well from 01:53:805 (628,629,630,631,632,633,634) - where the instruments are more fitting to the dkkdk series.

> 02:17:806 - extra k? 1+1+5 for 8 bars seems too boring. fixed

> 03:30:344 - change it to d for a mirror pattern with 03:31:575 - ^

[]

Nardo you can do some self-mods and amendments by yourself since no one really modded your Taiko set..... ;w; Rearranged some patterns from 00:09:960 to 00:14:729 - and from 03:53:960 to 03:58:729 - in Inner Oni to enhance variety.

Call me back for re-check, it takes too long for rank.....

Ascendance wrote:

Maybe remove the “taiko” from the diff names? It’s not really used anymore from what I’ve seen. I’ll come after Skylish places the taiko icon and everything is good from there

Ascendance wrote:

Waiting for the reply to ^ before modding

Asherz007 wrote:

Thought I'd take a quick look at the mania diffs. Dunno why, I just did I guess lol

Charts are mostly fine, though perhaps a couple of things to raise.

[Hitsounds]
00:09:960 - (both diffs) You sure no F here? There's one at 03:53:960 for the same thing. Well, in the MX there is and in the HD there isn't.

Deleted one in MX.

02:09:037 - MX has C and HD has F, make consistent pls kthx (hs pattern suggests C here)

Changed F to C in HD.

02:45:806 - (both diffs) There's some storyboarded hitsound business going on here, and I'm not entirely sure why. The sound generated from these hitsounds over the audio is essentially negligible. You could increase their volume so that they're heard, or you could remove them.

They were supposed to be deleted. Anyway all cleared.

03:04:729 - (MX) normal-hitfinish60 is doubled up in the storyboard, making the effect a little too loud for comfort imo. I'd remove this, particularly since there's only one of this hitsound rather than two in HD. Removed

MX

Might wanna bump to ODHP 8.5? Done

01:19:806 (79806|1,79960|1,80114|1) - I found this to be a little odd because the grouping of 3 for the stacks here feels a little counterintuitive (along with 01:20:267 (80267|3,80421|3,80575|3)). Perhaps this would be better off as being stacks of 2 instead. Something along the lines of this, maybe. I rearranged in a different way that was close to my original idea on this thing, which I think would be easier to see through at first glance.

Might want to move 01:23:806 (83806|2) into col 1 for the same reason. Fixed

01:34:883 - When there are two notes here but three in HD :thinking: (ditto at 03:04:729) Fixed

02:54:883 - Having these split 50/50 felt a little weird considering the SVs at 02:56:729 are done in the same way. What you could do as an alternative would be to shift the 0.8x back to 02:55:037 and change the other SV value to 1.4x for it to remain averaged properly. Guess this is more a matter of personal opinion, but I thought I'd put that out there. Same suggestion to HD since the same SV patterns are used.

Generally speaking I believe my current SVs have weeker effects, and because this is the only part where SVs appear, as kami mentioned, I try to make them in the easiest way. Just giving players some effects to notice but not too fierce would be my idea, so I would keep for here.

HD

00:34:729 (34729|1,34883|2) and 00:35:806 (35806|0,35960|2,36114|1) - I feel like you got stuck in two minds here. You primarily follow vocals here, though these are (perhaps inconsistently) here as filler and I'm not entirely sure why.

Fixed in a way that on each white line there is note and all others are for vocals. Should be something that I made halfway and forgot to delete lmao.

01:39:498 (99498|1,99498|0) - Probably wouldn't have the jump here like this when it's not the same pitch as 01:39:806 (99806|1,99806|0,100114|0,100114|1). Might be better for those two jumps to be [34] though, like 01:38:575 (98575|3,98575|2,99037|2,99037|3), since those are the same pitch here as well.

01:39:498 - Make this a [14] double note.

02:07:806 (127806|2,127960|1) - muh stack

The vocal just stands out here so as to note out the pitch difference of vocals here I didn't stack them.

02:45:190 (165190|1,165652|1) - Not sure about these two when you're focusing on vocals here?

02:45:190 - deleted this but pretty sure the latter one has vocal sound.

03:09:652 (189652|2,189652|0,189960|2,189960|3) - Where'd PR go
03:09:960 (189960|3,189960|2,190421|2,190421|3,190883|3,190883|2) - ^
03:13:806 (193806|0,193806|3) - Might wanna make this [13] to differentiate slightly from previous jump (different pitch n whatnot)

Rearranged

03:25:344 (205344|1,205498|1) and 03:35:190 (215190|2,215344|2) - consistent, but it feels a little odd to use the stack here when you're not implementing the idea so frequently. Maybe it's just me, I dunno. Pretty much rearranged everything here

The storyboard does kill a lot of low-end PCs, as it did mine lol
btw, I'm no storyboard expert, but is it a good idea to make things LoopForever? (like line 341220)

Guess I'm taking over or something, idk /s

1. 03:51:498 - storyboard load around here begins to peak at 20x, I have a pretty great computer and it makes even me lag, if there's some way you can reduce this, please do it
2. Unsnapped timing lines at 03:39:888 in all ctb diffs
3. Different sampleset number at 00:00:114 in ctb diffs, please make them consistent

1. 00:43:960 (2,1) - could use a dash here for powerful bass sound
2. 02:05:652 (1,2) - and 02:06:267 (3,4) - could both use some distance reduction
3. 02:06:883 (1) - skipping a pretty important sound on 02:07:037 - , could be a 1/2 pattern here
4. 02:08:114 (1,2,3,4) - same as earlier
5. 03:19:806 (2,3) - maybe a reduction here please owo
6. The diff is good but overall it could really use more hypers. there's nowhere near enough compared to the rain.