forum
Gekidan Hitotose - a e i u e o ao!!
posted
Total Posts
29
Topic Starter
arigatou!!! nice diff!!Rare wrote:
できました Gekidan Hitotose - a e i u e o ao!! (alacat) [Rare's Hard].osu
senpai teach me timing
cant stop listening to this song
o/ m4m
GL
Introduction to Gojuon
[Extra!!]
- 00:37:065 (3,1) - i thought they were snapped 1/2 apart. Maybe decrease spacing?
- 01:13:685 (6) - clap should be at sliderhead not slidertail
- 00:33:755 (4,5) - 00:35:824 (4,5) - they may cause confusion as players couldn't tell if they are 1/2 or 1/4 snapping
- 01:21:339 (2,1) - blanket
- 01:06:857 (4,3) - fix stacking
- 00:28:583 (5) - move to 192, 72 for better flow?
GL
no change but ill fix it somebody else say so~Nostalgic wrote:
o/ m4m
[Rare's Hard!!]
- 00:33:755 (4,5) - 00:35:824 (4,5) - they may cause confusion as players couldn't tell if they are 1/2 or 1/4 snapping
- 01:21:339 (2,1) - blanket
thanks for modding!
Hi. Here for M4M from your queue. Big time fan of a lot of your work like Ghost Assassin and EOS. Hope this helps!
[Easy]
00:51:547 (2,3) – These are a bit close and look a bit odd. Consider using the kind of slider at 00:50:719 (1) – for something like http://puu.sh/vk7bo/a6ec9682c7.jpg
[Normal]
00:08:102 (3) – This slider isn't quite symmetric with itself since the last half is bigger than the first. Move the red anchor to 40, 72.
[Rare's Hard]
00:10:585 (1,2) – This is what I see: http://puu.sh/vk7Tt/35b2cad98b.jpg . Try moving it so it doesn't overlap the HUD on smaller screen sizes
00:12:653 (3) – Consider not stacking and moving this to like the very top part of the screen (since the last click was on (2), there is a 2/1 pause between clicks, so doing so little for so long in the same spot felt odd to me).
00:25:273 (8) – This jump felt displeasing because (7) didn't have a jump. Since (7) is where the new strong beat starts and (7) isn't spaced, why should (8)? Try making (8) not spaced or try jumping into (7) like http://puu.sh/vk8dt/d96bdea732.jpg
00:30:031 (4,5,6) - ^
00:37:065 (7,8) – The spacing between these is 1.21x due to auto-stacking, which felt a bit small. Just want to make sure this is intentional.
[Insane]
01:12:236 (1,2,3) – This felt weaker than expected, and I didn't expect to think of 01:12:340 – as beat that was considered emphasized from my first read of the pattern. I think it's possible to make these all circles since you introduce the concept earlier at 00:09:343 (3,4,5,6) - , though I certainly understand why you don't want it to be too strong. You can also space these sliders out more which will help the player recognize the slider end as a strong beat like: http://puu.sh/vk9kq/4845646bc0.png
[Extra]
00:30:238 (10,1) – This jump feels like it could be bigger to emphasize that note more. Consider completing the (8,9,10,1) diamond like: http://puu.sh/vk7qV/938834bb15.png
01:22:994 (2,3) – Spacing felt a bit weak, try distancing these out more for more emphasis on (3)
This is a high quality mapset. Good luck!
[Easy]
00:51:547 (2,3) – These are a bit close and look a bit odd. Consider using the kind of slider at 00:50:719 (1) – for something like http://puu.sh/vk7bo/a6ec9682c7.jpg
[Normal]
00:08:102 (3) – This slider isn't quite symmetric with itself since the last half is bigger than the first. Move the red anchor to 40, 72.
[Rare's Hard]
00:10:585 (1,2) – This is what I see: http://puu.sh/vk7Tt/35b2cad98b.jpg . Try moving it so it doesn't overlap the HUD on smaller screen sizes
00:12:653 (3) – Consider not stacking and moving this to like the very top part of the screen (since the last click was on (2), there is a 2/1 pause between clicks, so doing so little for so long in the same spot felt odd to me).
00:25:273 (8) – This jump felt displeasing because (7) didn't have a jump. Since (7) is where the new strong beat starts and (7) isn't spaced, why should (8)? Try making (8) not spaced or try jumping into (7) like http://puu.sh/vk8dt/d96bdea732.jpg
00:30:031 (4,5,6) - ^
00:37:065 (7,8) – The spacing between these is 1.21x due to auto-stacking, which felt a bit small. Just want to make sure this is intentional.
[Insane]
01:12:236 (1,2,3) – This felt weaker than expected, and I didn't expect to think of 01:12:340 – as beat that was considered emphasized from my first read of the pattern. I think it's possible to make these all circles since you introduce the concept earlier at 00:09:343 (3,4,5,6) - , though I certainly understand why you don't want it to be too strong. You can also space these sliders out more which will help the player recognize the slider end as a strong beat like: http://puu.sh/vk9kq/4845646bc0.png
[Extra]
00:30:238 (10,1) – This jump feels like it could be bigger to emphasize that note more. Consider completing the (8,9,10,1) diamond like: http://puu.sh/vk7qV/938834bb15.png
01:22:994 (2,3) – Spacing felt a bit weak, try distancing these out more for more emphasis on (3)
This is a high quality mapset. Good luck!
Topic Starter
@Dragontail
fixed jumps on Insane diff!
@Nostalgic
I feel it's better to add a clap on slider tail because the sound of slider tail is stronger sound than slider head. then, fixed other points!
@pinataman
fixed all on my diff!
Thanks modding!
fixed jumps on Insane diff!
@Nostalgic
I feel it's better to add a clap on slider tail because the sound of slider tail is stronger sound than slider head. then, fixed other points!
@pinataman
fixed all on my diff!
Thanks modding!
fixed only (7,8) spacing due to auto stacking.pinataman wrote:
[Rare's Hard]
00:10:585 (1,2) – This is what I see: http://puu.sh/vk7Tt/35b2cad98b.jpg . Try moving it so it doesn't overlap the HUD on smaller screen sizes
00:12:653 (3) – Consider not stacking and moving this to like the very top part of the screen (since the last click was on (2), there is a 2/1 pause between clicks, so doing so little for so long in the same spot felt odd to me).
00:25:273 (8) – This jump felt displeasing because (7) didn't have a jump. Since (7) is where the new strong beat starts and (7) isn't spaced, why should (8)? Try making (8) not spaced or try jumping into (7) like http://puu.sh/vk8dt/d96bdea732.jpg
00:30:031 (4,5,6) - ^
00:37:065 (7,8) – The spacing between these is 1.21x due to auto-stacking, which felt a bit small. Just want to make sure this is intentional.
no change others because i'd like to ask other modder's opinions.
thanks for modding!
https://puu.sh/vmZ1v.osu
Extra!!
- 00:00:860 (2,3,4) - The triplet sounds overmapped imo... You could try a rhythm like this: would at least emphasize the vocals. There's a vocal on blue tick, but making player click on 00:00:860 - is kinda forced.
- 00:08:516 (7,8,1) - Maybe do a bigger jump onto 1 since you're switching to vocal emphasis.
- 00:09:343 (3,4) - And I think using doubles here would fit the vocals better. It would set up your rhythm for the next section.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Idk about this. If you're following vocals, it's a quad rhythm here, not two doubles. There's a vocal on 00:22:791 - . Maybe just do a 5 note stream instead?
- 00:49:271 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is a really big jump into a triplet xP. I think it's too big for the section and makes it feel forced, especially since the triplets are kinda hard to catch due to the angle you use too.
- 01:10:995 (4) - 01:11:823 (7) - NC'ing here for the vocals is kinda cool. I think you can do that instead of doing gaps with followpoints here. It will set up 01:12:236 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - a lot better imo.
Insane!!
- Try using stack leniency 6 instead, so patterns like 01:04:581 (3,1) - 01:06:236 (3,2) - don't stack. It looks a bit unnecessary to stack them.
- 00:00:654 (1,2) - Same as Extra? replace with 1/2 slider.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Same as Insane about this rhythm being a quad instead of two doubles. 00:22:791 - Should be a circle.
Rare's Hard!!
- 00:03:136 (4,5,6) - I would put the jump from 5>6 instead for the vocal.
- 00:03:964 (1,2,3,4,5) - Stacking makes the spacing here seem inconsistent. Move some objects around slightly to account for the stack?
- 00:14:722 (1,2) - This jump felt kinda random... Like, why jump here and not in a lot of other places?
- 00:37:065 (7,8,9,10) - Stacking messes up your spacing pattern here so move the triplet down and right a bit more to offset the stack.
- 01:25:063 (1) - How about putting a circle on 01:25:063 - and putting the spinner onto the blue tick?
Normal!!
- Good. Only complaint would probably be 01:03:961 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - being really clustered together. I worry new players might have trouble reading due to all the repeats and stacks. But I can't think of a good way to fix without simplifying rhythm. It's probably fine though xD.
Easy!!
- 00:21:756 (3,4) - Just an idea, but i think flipping slider 3 would look nicer and have better visual flow:
- 00:32:514 (1,2) - Blanket is pretty off ;w; (or i'm very nazi)
- 01:25:063 - Circle here and spinner 1/4 a beat after? You did this for Normal too.
[]
Clean set~ Call me back!
- 00:00:860 (2,3,4) - The triplet sounds overmapped imo... You could try a rhythm like this: would at least emphasize the vocals. There's a vocal on blue tick, but making player click on 00:00:860 - is kinda forced.
- 00:08:516 (7,8,1) - Maybe do a bigger jump onto 1 since you're switching to vocal emphasis.
- 00:09:343 (3,4) - And I think using doubles here would fit the vocals better. It would set up your rhythm for the next section.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Idk about this. If you're following vocals, it's a quad rhythm here, not two doubles. There's a vocal on 00:22:791 - . Maybe just do a 5 note stream instead?
- 00:49:271 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is a really big jump into a triplet xP. I think it's too big for the section and makes it feel forced, especially since the triplets are kinda hard to catch due to the angle you use too.
- 01:10:995 (4) - 01:11:823 (7) - NC'ing here for the vocals is kinda cool. I think you can do that instead of doing gaps with followpoints here. It will set up 01:12:236 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - a lot better imo.
Insane!!
- Try using stack leniency 6 instead, so patterns like 01:04:581 (3,1) - 01:06:236 (3,2) - don't stack. It looks a bit unnecessary to stack them.
- 00:00:654 (1,2) - Same as Extra? replace with 1/2 slider.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Same as Insane about this rhythm being a quad instead of two doubles. 00:22:791 - Should be a circle.
Rare's Hard!!
- 00:03:136 (4,5,6) - I would put the jump from 5>6 instead for the vocal.
- 00:03:964 (1,2,3,4,5) - Stacking makes the spacing here seem inconsistent. Move some objects around slightly to account for the stack?
- 00:14:722 (1,2) - This jump felt kinda random... Like, why jump here and not in a lot of other places?
- 00:37:065 (7,8,9,10) - Stacking messes up your spacing pattern here so move the triplet down and right a bit more to offset the stack.
- 01:25:063 (1) - How about putting a circle on 01:25:063 - and putting the spinner onto the blue tick?
Normal!!
- Good. Only complaint would probably be 01:03:961 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - being really clustered together. I worry new players might have trouble reading due to all the repeats and stacks. But I can't think of a good way to fix without simplifying rhythm. It's probably fine though xD.
Easy!!
- 00:21:756 (3,4) - Just an idea, but i think flipping slider 3 would look nicer and have better visual flow:
- 00:32:514 (1,2) - Blanket is pretty off ;w; (or i'm very nazi)
- 01:25:063 - Circle here and spinner 1/4 a beat after? You did this for Normal too.
[]
Clean set~ Call me back!
Topic Starter
Thank you so much, Monstrata!Monstrata wrote:
Extra!!
- 00:00:860 (2,3,4) - The triplet sounds overmapped imo... You could try a rhythm like this: would at least emphasize the vocals. There's a vocal on blue tick, but making player click on 00:00:860 - is kinda forced.
- 00:08:516 (7,8,1) - Maybe do a bigger jump onto 1 since you're switching to vocal emphasis.
- 00:09:343 (3,4) - And I think using doubles here would fit the vocals better. It would set up your rhythm for the next section.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Idk about this. If you're following vocals, it's a quad rhythm here, not two doubles. There's a vocal on 00:22:791 - . Maybe just do a 5 note stream instead?
- 00:49:271 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is a really big jump into a triplet xP. I think it's too big for the section and makes it feel forced, especially since the triplets are kinda hard to catch due to the angle you use too.
- 01:10:995 (4) - 01:11:823 (7) - NC'ing here for the vocals is kinda cool. I think you can do that instead of doing gaps with followpoints here. It will set up 01:12:236 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - a lot better imo.really cool <3
Insane!!
- Try using stack leniency 6 instead, so patterns like 01:04:581 (3,1) - 01:06:236 (3,2) - don't stack. It looks a bit unnecessary to stack them.
- 00:00:654 (1,2) - Same as Extra? replace with 1/2 slider.
- 00:22:584 (1,2,3,4) - Same as Insane about this rhythm being a quad instead of two doubles. 00:22:791 - Should be a circle.
Normal!!
- Good. Only complaint would probably be 01:03:961 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - being really clustered together. I worry new players might have trouble reading due to all the repeats and stacks. But I can't think of a good way to fix without simplifying rhythm. It's probably fine though xD.
Easy!!
- 00:21:756 (3,4) - Just an idea, but i think flipping slider 3 would look nicer and have better visual flow:
- 00:32:514 (1,2) - Blanket is pretty off ;w; (or i'm very nazi)
- 01:25:063 - Circle here and spinner 1/4 a beat after? You did this for Normal too.
[]
Clean set~ Call me back!
all fixed~Monstrata wrote:
Rare's Hard!!
- 00:03:136 (4,5,6) - I would put the jump from 5>6 instead for the vocal.
- 00:03:964 (1,2,3,4,5) - Stacking makes the spacing here seem inconsistent. Move some objects around slightly to account for the stack?
- 00:14:722 (1,2) - This jump felt kinda random... Like, why jump here and not in a lot of other places?
- 00:37:065 (7,8,9,10) - Stacking messes up your spacing pattern here so move the triplet down and right a bit more to offset the stack.
- 01:25:063 (1) - How about putting a circle on 01:25:063 - and putting the spinner onto the blue tick?
thanks for modding!
http://puu.sh/vn6pf.osu
Topic Starter
update~
Recheck:
HP's seem a bit high for the difficulties of the map. Maybe HP 5 for Hard, 6 for Insane, and 7 for Extra?
AR's seem a bit low too, considering the song ias 145 bpm and you use a lot of 1/4 rhythms. I would go with AR 8.7-9 for Extra, AR 8.3-8.5 for Insane, and AR 7.5 at least for Hard.
Let me know what you think though. You put decimals so you probably have a reason for your settings.
[]
Other than settings, everything looks good!
HP's seem a bit high for the difficulties of the map. Maybe HP 5 for Hard, 6 for Insane, and 7 for Extra?
AR's seem a bit low too, considering the song ias 145 bpm and you use a lot of 1/4 rhythms. I would go with AR 8.7-9 for Extra, AR 8.3-8.5 for Insane, and AR 7.5 at least for Hard.
Let me know what you think though. You put decimals so you probably have a reason for your settings.
[]
Other than settings, everything looks good!
Topic Starter
agreed about HP drain rate, set to 5/6/7
Then, AR is enough for 145 bpm in my opinion. I guess some people will play my map with double time. so 7/8/8.4 is best to me!
Edit : changed diff name =w=
Then, AR is enough for 145 bpm in my opinion. I guess some people will play my map with double time. so 7/8/8.4 is best to me!
Edit : changed diff name =w=
a e i u e o bubble!
Topic Starter
Thank you <3
Sorry for the huge delay, but I've been busy with University these days.
Alright.
extra!!
insane!!
Edit: We've discussed about one rhythm in the Hard difficulty, personally I think it's fine; due that it helps to make the transition between the 1/3 rhythm more softer, and clean.
Alright.
- 00:49:064 (2,3,4,5) - To avoid any kind of confusion while playing, I'd like to suggest to unstack the next triples, or either moving those three circles in a completely another direction; since them with (1) gives the impression that they're a 4 circles' stream. Aalso it could improve the aesthetics itself for being consistent with 00:49:685 (6,7,8) - these ones.
- 01:12:236 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern is really interesting, but... somehow; the last double with the next stream makes an uncomfortable, and weird movement for the player, due that that people won't be expect about that these doubles turns in an actual fully stream instead. Consider to increase the spacing for 01:13:167 (2,3,4,5) - a bit more, or re-do it a little bit.
- 01:13:685 (6,1) - This is way too much spacing for this section in my opinion, it's just 01:12:236 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - the same rhythm as this one, so I'd like to move it closer each other more, I think it'll improve the flow more.
- 00:34:893 (6,1) - Could you increase the spacing a bit more? looks almost the same as the previous 1/2 circles which could be a problem for playing to get the next rhythm.
Edit: We've discussed about one rhythm in the Hard difficulty, personally I think it's fine; due that it helps to make the transition between the 1/3 rhythm more softer, and clean.
Log
08:58 alacat: Thank you <3
09:19 Gero: You're welcome, sorry I've been busy with University ;u;
09:19 Gero: orz
09:19 Gero: call me back =v=b
09:22 alacat: it's ok <3
09:22 alacat: and all fixed :3!
09:23 alacat: then, Just a quick question on Hard 01:23:408 (3) - should be 1/3 or 1/4 ? xd
09:25 Gero: I think 1/3 should be good enough dude that the previous and next rhythms are like that... but looking into your diffs; wouldn't be weird that you mapped it with just a circle in 01:23:408 - while Rare made it into a slider?
09:25 Gero: D:
09:25 Gero: personally it's okay
09:25 alacat: ok :D
09:27 alacat: btw remake this part to sliders ! 01:13:064 (3,4,5) -
09:27 Gero: looks great <3
09:27 Gero: okay I'll Qualify it now
09:28 alacat: Thanks you! current pattern is really bad lol
09:29 alacat: this map will be my 55th ranked map xD
09:30 Gero: I bet you're excited
09:30 Gero: \o/
09:33 alacat: yeah \:D/
Topic Starter
Thank you \o/
Topic Starter
Brain Power
So faster lol
Gratzz~
Gratzz~
オメデス！
Topic Starter
arigatou~