It's like a reply chain.
Thanks for the clarification. Seems I still need to think some things through. Still annoyed at the rounding that I need to do, since most of these 1/4 graces are actually not really on any bit of the beat... :s
Rivals_7 wrote:my response is in Bold Blue
00:17:751 (17751|1) - aw cmon this is the hardest diff and you still mapping clap with singles? Yup. Because the opening section focuses more around the vocals than anything else, these remained as singles. 4 sometimes isn't enough. Would have liked to have kept everything, but I think with clap doubles the section lost its playability. Also, being the easiest section in the song, I don't think it's too much of a problem. Being the easiest huh? although the song pace are being the fastest among all the section? that sounds contradicted. Oh,
good point. Felt like I wrote some fluff earlier.
00:18:862 (18862|1,18862|3) - and then a random doubles appear for a kick? where's the consistency? Not changing. I'll tell you the consistency. Not in the immediate vicinity, but the 8-bar phrase from 00:17:084. On each of the new measures, it goes triple-double-double-double, then triple-double-double-double again. Not random imo. i saw the intention now xd but reconsider this if you change something around Will do.
00:21:084 (21084|3,21084|2,21306|0,21306|3) - apparently this doesnt seem to be consistent with - 00:19:306 (19306|3,19417|0,19529|1,19640|2) - even though they are musically the same and have the same instruments as well What? 00:20:862 (20862|2,20862|0,21084|3,21084|2,21306|0,21306|3,21529|2,21529|3,21751|0,21751|1) follows the strings and that weird perc sound. Besides, bars 2 and 3 of a 4-bar pattern aren't normally the same.
well then you missing a kick at - 00:21:195 - and - 00:21:417 - in representing the consistency with - 00:17:751 (17751|1,17862|2) - and - 00:19:417 (19417|0,19529|1,19640|2) - Fair enough. Still, quite mean of the song's kicks not quite landing on the 1/4s.
00:26:640 (26640|2) - clap is here. not - 00:26:751 (26751|1,26751|3) - therefore the clap should have a double since its musically make sense Also musically makes sense to emphasise the syncopation, which both vocals and backgroun synth are on.
so why is this - 00:28:417 (28417|1,28417|3,28529|0) - not the same? iirc syncopation is a condition where there's some unusual beats on a certain measure. from what i see here - 00:26:417 (26417|0,26529|1,26640|2,26751|3,26751|1) - these rythm are kick-kick(altho sounds quite faint idk)-clap-kick. You see the 3 out of 4 rythm are kicks, with clap occured on 3/4. if you want it to follow the term syncopation, you should at least change it to something similar with - 00:28:195 (28195|3,28306|2,28417|1,28417|3,28529|0) - PS: there's no synth i could hear of :u Seems I don't know what I'm talking about either. xD I, uh, don't know what they are by name lol. Synthy trumpet things? In any case, they're the same now. Both of initial highlights are doubles.
00:33:084 (33084|1,33084|0,33084|3) - now you see you didnt use a full 1/4 like you do in the HD so.... HD changed so... I MEAN MX AAAAA BRAIN DAMMIT. anyways i see it now and i think should be ok as of now. I mean MX too.
just to clarify something because i was modding this at early morning so my explanation is really messed ahahaha xD