I'm gonna take a stab at interpreting animask's question. Do you mean something like "People have been finding my previous behaviour suspicious, but if I stop acting like that will you guys find the fact that I'm acting differently suspicious?"
Yes, that's what I mean. I have a strong feeling that at least some of you will be.0_o wrote:
I'm gonna take a stab at interpreting animask's question. Do you mean something like "People have been finding my previous behaviour suspicious, but if I stop acting like that will you guys find the fact that I'm acting differently suspicious?"
I doubt any townie would jump on you if they suspected you have an aux role.animask wrote:
You might be secretly assuming I have an aux role, but accusing people of having one isn't a pro-town thing to do
(at this time of the game).
I have no idea what this even means.DeathxShinigami wrote:
tick tock tick tock.
So....any ideas if we can assume what role animask is?
Good town players don't try to look less (or more) suspicious. They have nothing to worry about, and nothing to hide.animask wrote:
@Rolled, I thought being less suspicious was something that everyone is supposed to do.
No matter what role you have, being suspicious isn't a good thing.
You're right. But suspicions change; your role doesn't. Suspicions are traits of a character, and that character is bound to a role. Don't think of suspicions as traits of a role.animask wrote:
You assume that I'm hiding a role (which happens to be mafia). Being suspicious doesn't always make you mafia.
There's a difference here. DxS isn't claiming (explicitly or implicitly) that animask has a role. Rentai, however, is implicitly claiming that Rolled has a certain role. (I personally don't share this view with animask; I am just expressing my thoughts about your FoS.)Haneii wrote:
Furthermore, you spent your past posts explaining how assuming/accusing someone of a role this early in the game isn't pro-town. DxS was just role fishing + expressed his thoughts about you having a pro aux role or being a plain town member. Yet, after all that, you suspect and vote Rantai?
=[animask wrote:
Day 1 is almost over and I probably won't be able to post again before its done.
animask wrote:
Day 1 is almost over and I probably won't be able to post again before its done.
What?LS wrote:
(36 hours ago)
Deadline is in /6/ days.
Pretty sure that was a joke.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Ph0x
Why exactly would you want to "imply"/"show" that someone is a power role?
Remember when I said that I don't really use meta as a basis for suspicion/exemption.0_o wrote:
Also, why did you vote animask for saying WIFOM things when you said yourself that he says those kind of comments regardless of his role?
(2 days ago)
Unless I read that wrong.LadySuburu wrote:
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is in /6/ days.
unvote Rantai, FoS RantaiLadySuburu wrote:
8. Voting is back to the normal system.
I'd say reactions like yours are pretty revealing.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Ph0x
Why exactly would you want to "imply"/"show" that someone is a power role?
Well I disagree with your strategy, but fair enough.NoHItter wrote:
Remember when I said that I don't really use meta as a basis for suspicion/exemption.0_o wrote:
Also, why did you vote animask for saying WIFOM things when you said yourself that he says those kind of comments regardless of his role?
What animask said was suspicious and regardless of past play, I opt to vote suspicious players.
Chillin'.0_o wrote:
sooooo what's up guys
Would you care to explain why you find me suspicious?Firo Prochainezo wrote:
This situation has been pretty confusing and I don't know what to say.
Except the fact that NoHItter sounds mildly suspicious.
NoHItter wrote:
animask, you aren't supposed to make comments like those. They're just WIFOM.
FoS: animask
NoHItter wrote:
Yea. Statements like those are very WIFOM.0_o wrote:
It's funny because I was this close to posting the same thing.
Generally we should avoid WIFOM, but there are some cases where WIFOM is unavoidable.
(I don't know if Firo came to the same conclusion as me. Just stating my thoughts of NoHItter after a re-read.)NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Ph0x
Why exactly would you want to "imply"/"show" that someone is a power role?
Example?animask wrote:
He seems to actually be using WIFOM and at the same time claiming that using WIFOM is useless.
I have no idea what's going through DxS's mind most of the time. It doesn't make sense for either a pro-town OR mafia player to say, since it's not only rolefishing but blatantly obvious rolefishing. So my official opinion: no idea.Ph0X wrote:
0_o, what are your thoughts on DxS's rolefishing post?
So you find me saying that WIFOM is bad more suspicious than DxS rolefishing, or animask using WIFOM?Ph0X wrote:
NoHItter is being very tryhard, hiding behind the "WIFOM is never useful" shield.
So you say that the only reason you're voting me is for what Ph0x said, and that you agreed on it?Firo Prochainezo wrote:
I don't need to repeat what Ph0X said.
Vote: NoHItter
How am I using WIFOM? Show me the part when I am.animask wrote:
He seems to actually be using WIFOM and at the same time claiming that using WIFOM is useless.