Hi, from my modding queue~
[General]
[nyu's Easy]
[Normal]
[Hard]
[Insane]
[General]
- Combo colours missing in some diffs zz
[nyu's Easy]
- 00:14:970 (1,2) - Can be combined to a single slider to make 00:16:366 (3,4,5) more stand out.
- 00:17:761 (1,2) - 00:20:584 (1,2) - Better use the same rhythm for consistency since the rhythms on these places aren't really different.
- 00:27:606 (3) - Should be 2 circles cuz 00:27:955 is stronger than 00:26:559 - 00:27:257 so you should use a different rhythm here to reflect that.
- The gimmicks play alright but to me you didn't think it through enough:
- 00:23:412 (1,1) - You did a very stand out gimmick 00:23:412 (1,1) while the rhythm isn't intense/prominent enough to call for it.
- 01:26:949 (4,1) - Regardless whether this is intentional or not, it's still should be consistent with 01:21:367 (4,4) considering the rhythm is the same.
- 00:31:792 (1,1) - Should be the same rhythm as well.
[Normal]
- 00:06:162 (4) - I don't see the need to be risky with this lol, you didn't map this in Hard anyways.
- 00:16:191 (4) - 00:16:714 (5) - Could NC on either of these considering you did that on every downbeat.
- 00:28:478 (3,1) - DS
- 00:37:373 (1) - Could mislead players when combined with 00:31:792 (1) lol, better do one of these on both places so it's not too confusing.
- 00:45:048 (3) - Can be a longer slider cuz it's not really the sound happening at that spot is held longer than 00:44:350 (1,2) so a longer slider can reflect that.
- 01:01:792 (2) - Shouldn't this be the same rhythm as 00:59:001 (2,3) according to how you variated things 00:47:141 (1) - 00:49:931 (1) - 00:52:722 (3,4) - 00:55:513 (1,2) - every two times?
- 01:07:373 (3) - Optional but 2 circles could work here too, just suggesting my idea lol
- 01:31:832 (4,5) - 01:34:623 (1,2) - Better stick with DS on these places.
- 01:49:972 (3) - NC
- My biggest concern here on this is aesthetics:
- 00:06:598 (1,1) - 00:10:784 (1,1) - General thumb rule when mapping with DS is that you shouldn't trap yourself into an overlap like these, they badly ruins aesthetics cuz those overlaps won't look tidy and intentional. (Overlaps should be intentional otherwise things will be pretty much random everywhere in the map so yeah)
- 00:20:584 (1,2,1) - Try to pay more attention to visual spacing, following DS is fine but in this case it's not good enough, something like this would be a lot better cuz I gave more visual spacing between 00:20:584 (1,1) so it looks cleaner, you can try to apply that with lots of things like 00:47:838 (2,1,2) - 00:52:722 (3,4,5) - 01:29:739 (3,1,2) - etc as well.
[Hard]
- 00:10:784 (8) - 00:13:575 (6) - 00:16:366 (8) - NC I guess.
- 00:42:955 (1,2,3,4) - Appreciate the idea but should be something different from 00:40:164 (1,2,3,4) - 00:41:560 (1,2,3,4) cuz there's no spooky vocals anymore so you should do something else to differentiate that, something like this could work, spamming circles like 00:44:350 (3,4,5,6,7) also somewhat works.
- 00:42:955 (1,2,3,4) - 00:44:350 (5,6,7,8,9) - Actually both of these should have the same rhythm considering you did that with 00:40:164 (1,2,3,4) - 00:41:560 (1,2,3,4) - already.
- 00:47:838 (3) - 00:48:187 (4) - These two are clearly different rhythm-wise, shouldn't be mapped in the same way, making 00:47:838 (3) a triplet starting at 00:47:838 would already work fine. Same also applies to 00:53:420 (3,4) .
- 01:05:280 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - This is clearly more intense than your slider pattern things in previous measure so you should do something different on this to indicate the change in intensity, changing sliders to circles or increasing the spacings between these sliders could work.
- 01:58:431 (1) - Pretty sure this isn't intentional for starting this on the blue tick lol
[Insane]
- 00:14:621 (9,10,1) - Shouldn't this be the same as that back and forth thing like 00:09:040 (1,2,1) ? Because you're consistently doing these 00:07:645 (5,6,1) - 00:13:226 (5,6,1) then I don't see any reason to be inconsistent with this one.
- 00:09:040 (1) - 00:14:621 (9) - Also be more consistent with your NCs pls
- 00:20:584 (6,7) - A 2/1 slider instead of this would play better cuz the sound at 00:20:584 is more fitting to hold with a slider if you ask me, also to be consistent with 00:17:761 (1) .
- 00:22:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Try not to space these so much when you spaced these 00:17:761 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) a lot smaller lol, a drastic difference in spacing isn't a good thing when the rhythm isn't different.
- 00:22:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Also not sure what are you going for by doing both things 00:22:349 (1,2,3) - 00:22:878 (4,5,6,7) - in one pattern lol just stick to one of these I guess.
- 01:39:507 - Why you ended kiai here but not 01:38:809 like the other diffs tho?
- 00:26:211 (1,2) - 00:26:908 (3,4) - The pattern is repeating itself yet you did overlaps differently, should be more consistent with minor details tbh
- 00:28:478 (9) - Kind of anti-climatic for a build up, 3 circles would be more fitting as an introduction to a new section with a higher intensity. Stuff like 00:34:059 (5,6,7) would work too but up to you I guess.
- 00:30:571 - Don't skip this lol
- 00:29:873 (5,6,7) - 00:31:269 (5,6,7) - etc. Should be more consistent with your spacing on these 3 circles, 00:30:048 (6,7) - 00:31:443 (6,7) - are spaced so differently despite being the same thing, and I don't even know if this is meant to have an equal spacing considering you tried to do a triangle with it. Should be more consistent with spacings when you're doing the same thing, 00:35:455 (5,6,7) - 00:36:850 (5,6,7) should be taken care off as well.
- 00:43:478 (4,1) - 00:44:176 (4,1) - Actually you should prioritize on emphasizing these with bigger spacings than the rest lol
- 01:02:838 (2,4) - Shouldn't do this cuz you always made them clearly different in earlier measures 00:48:536 (1,2,3) - 00:49:234 (4,5,6) - 00:54:117 (1,2,3) - 00:54:815 (4,5,6) but this one looks visually ambiguous lol try to come up with something else.
- 01:07:722 - Should be clickable.
- 01:24:856 (1,2,3) - Why are you making this a pattern and not other places like 01:22:065 (1,2,3) - 01:30:437 (5,6,7) when the same/similar rhythm is happening.
- 01:54:856 (1,6) - Inconsistent NCs
- So basically my point of these suggestions is you should be more consistent with whatever you're doing when the rhythm is similar/same, and try to focus more on using spacings for emphasis.