just lol
Yeah, Lince have the permission (that was fast)Ephemeral wrote:
Do you have RLC's permission to use his hitsounding so closely? It's almost 1:1 in some parts. Not really sure if I'm comfortable with that even if you do have his permission.
Thanks for understandingEphemeral wrote:
No worries, then. Hitsounding wasn't as close as I thought after subsequent listens anyway.
LMFAO i love this communityRevengeZ wrote:
i agreePizzarollMC wrote:
LMFAO i love this communityRevengeZ wrote:
I'm hereLince Cosmico wrote:
thanks a lot squirrel :psquirrelpascals wrote:
sorry this is extremely late i dont know what caused me to skip over modding this for so long so i definitely owe it to you iim fucking loving you right now so i don't care about the time i waited ♥lince• 01:04:008 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - would like these curves to feel more structured together, 01:04:524 (1,2) - looks justified but this curve 01:04:008 (4,5,6,7,8) - kind of throws that symmetry off take in mind that the symmetry I wanted is on 01:04:524 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , if you look it like that it feels really neat
• 01:09:007 (1,2) - similar to above, these two different curves look strange together the samee thing here 01:09:352 (2,3,4) -
• 01:31:766 (1) - feels weird that this is the only circle not using normal sampleset totally missed that onee (even thought i rechecked hitsounds like 5 times)
• 02:15:214 (1) - 02:12:455 (1,2) - two very differnet ways of handling this rhythm, causes a bit of inconsistency. i would suggest adding something at 02:15:559 - similar to 02:06:938 (1,2) - to stay with your long hold-rhythm concept fixed
• 02:20:731 - not a fan of how you skip over this downbeat, theres a drum and synth at 02:20:731 - that i dont feel like is justified enough by the slider corner I'm sorry but i can't be agree at all, of course it's a drum and a downbeat and its kinda relevant, but it iisn't strong as 02:12:628 - , also the emphasis right now is really good imo, and it gives a good feeling while playing more than a generic slider circle pattern
• 02:53:490 (1,1) - not as big of an exaggeration here as something like 02:12:110 (1,1) - , i would suggest adding more because this beat had a lot of impact than usual If you mean the spacing, well i can't do that much about it, If i move it then I would lose the spaciing consistency, the stack (02:55:214 (1) - ) and the blanket (02:54:352 (3,4,5,6,7) - ), also, it already gives the feel that i wanted to express, so it should be ok like that
• 03:07:973 (2,3,4,5,6) - the curve compared on the stream compared to the slider is a bit sharper, can you make these look better together i kinda moved it a bit and adjusted it so i could stack this 03:05:904 (8,8,5) -
looked through the second part a lot and you were pretty consistent with how you mapped this hey thanks
call me back for qual
finally :'D, now time to wait gaston to post this lol
a n g e r ysquirrelpascals wrote:
[not the RLC map]
Gabe wrote:
congrats!!
Tyistiana wrote:
Congratz!
Thanks so much ❤My Angel Kanan wrote:
a n g e r ysquirrelpascals wrote:
[not the RLC map]
Congrats~
Thanks anyways~Lince Cosmico wrote:
uwu thanks for checkingMirash wrote:
05:06:248 (1) - was this default normal clap on purpose? you didn't put it first kiai and even if it was on purpose it sounds super out of place here, also 02:22:628 (1) - sounds better without any normal claps on it lol Yes, it was absolutelly on purpose, i wanted to emphasize the vocals more on the last part so i added that even thought i didn't on the previous parts
03:32:455 (1,2) - since 2 has no strong sound like, for example 03:35:214 (1) - it could be spaced closer?? uhh I don't think that it would emphasize it better
05:12:110 (2,3,4,5,6) - drum here even as an introduction for coming part with drum samples sounds not that nice tbh, doing it consistent with 01:53:662 (3,4,5,6,7) - will make more sense ew idk man, i kinda like how is it right now
06:22:800 (2) - missing a clap It's not that i missed it, i removed it cuz i felt that it would feel better to not have it, i focused the emphasis on 06:23:835 - , also it would sound kinda bad if i add it there because 06:22:800 (2,3) - these would work as two consecutive claps and i dont like it at all
Not woof :^)Surono wrote:
not weef
argentina best memer
Hey, thanks so much!Artymis wrote:
Good job! Seeing this qualified put a smile on my face.
Congratulations on the approval!
Plz, talk with Lince via discordStingy wrote:
seen
I have been already?gaston_2199 wrote:
Plz, talk with Lince via discordStingy wrote:
seen
I spoke with Lince and he says he can not get into the game yet. He spoke with a QAT and said there were no problems with the marked pointsStingy wrote:
I have been already?
ok lolgaston_2199 wrote:
I spoke with Lince and he says he can not get into the game yet. He spoke with a QAT and said there were no problems with the marked pointsStingy wrote:
I have been already?