Hi From Modding Queue, Since you wanted to go to my queue again I'll only be modding uno diff dis time thxs.
[Expert]
[Expert]
00:05:556 (1) - Finish pls
00:11:525 (1) - Emphasize with spacing pls, very underwhelming for an Expert diff
00:13:362 (2,3,4,5,1) - Wait what's the reasoning behind this star pattern? Not much is going on in a calm part but just a random 5 note star pattern with above average spacing is here compared to 00:14:587 (3,4,5) -
00:15:964 (3) - This is supposed to have the most emphasis but (4) and (5) has bigger spacing
00:18:413 - Feels better if this was mapped out imo. Doesn't skip out on important beats. Just Ctrl+G 00:18:260 (2,3) - so it can be like this 00:18:872 (1,2) -
00:19:485 (3) - Big difference between the slider you used previously. Even though both have a upbeat this one has a lesser impact which makes sense that you can have a 1/1 slider
00:31:117 (1) - Sort of hides the repeat slider making this unrankable. Even though you can see the slider itself the repeat is hidden which may or may not confuse bad players
00:31:576 - Still an important sound here but you can do however
00:32:418 (7) - Can't hear a distinctive beat on this so it makes this triplet weak
00:44:051 (4) - Same as ^ can be said here
00:47:724 (4) - Same
00:50:556 (5,1) - Seems like a random placement. Based on the music it would just be a gradual increase especially with how the pattern is already starting out with 00:50:250 (3,4,5) - Feels something like this http://puu.sh/w8Nq6/2c5e9b847d.jpg
00:49:944 - Should be a note here. 1 for a rollover instead of a random pause into the next portion and because a 1 slider NC is strange
00:51:934 - This should be ended on a vocal because all your staccato vocals are at 00:51:474 (2) - 00:51:627 (3) - 00:51:780 (1) - 00:51:934 - But tbh it feels the same either way so you can do whatever.
01:23:158 (3,4,5) - Uh that's so ugly looking when you look at i with stack on
Good Nuff baby
00:11:525 (1) - Emphasize with spacing pls, very underwhelming for an Expert diff
00:13:362 (2,3,4,5,1) - Wait what's the reasoning behind this star pattern? Not much is going on in a calm part but just a random 5 note star pattern with above average spacing is here compared to 00:14:587 (3,4,5) -
00:15:964 (3) - This is supposed to have the most emphasis but (4) and (5) has bigger spacing
00:18:413 - Feels better if this was mapped out imo. Doesn't skip out on important beats. Just Ctrl+G 00:18:260 (2,3) - so it can be like this 00:18:872 (1,2) -
00:19:485 (3) - Big difference between the slider you used previously. Even though both have a upbeat this one has a lesser impact which makes sense that you can have a 1/1 slider
00:31:117 (1) - Sort of hides the repeat slider making this unrankable. Even though you can see the slider itself the repeat is hidden which may or may not confuse bad players
00:31:576 - Still an important sound here but you can do however
00:32:418 (7) - Can't hear a distinctive beat on this so it makes this triplet weak
00:44:051 (4) - Same as ^ can be said here
00:47:724 (4) - Same
00:50:556 (5,1) - Seems like a random placement. Based on the music it would just be a gradual increase especially with how the pattern is already starting out with 00:50:250 (3,4,5) - Feels something like this http://puu.sh/w8Nq6/2c5e9b847d.jpg
00:49:944 - Should be a note here. 1 for a rollover instead of a random pause into the next portion and because a 1 slider NC is strange
00:51:934 - This should be ended on a vocal because all your staccato vocals are at 00:51:474 (2) - 00:51:627 (3) - 00:51:780 (1) - 00:51:934 - But tbh it feels the same either way so you can do whatever.
01:23:158 (3,4,5) - Uh that's so ugly looking when you look at i with stack on
Good Nuff baby