ASPIRIN wrote:

hello there

the mod

[The Merciful]

• 
  Извиняюсь что так долго не писал.

1. 01:44:567 (1,2,3,4) - мне кажется вот такие штуки слишком сложно выглядят для 2 звёзд. Да ну, в этой карте и так до сего момента было достаточно много антифлоу, не думаю, что это слишком сильно ломает.
2. 03:36:137 (3,4,1) - тут сломан флоу Бланкет не сломан, на том спасибо. Я тут хотел сделать именно его.
3. 04:03:170 (2,3,1) - вся твоя карта визуально вылизана до блеска, но вот тут мне кажется нота между двумя слайдерами стоит немного не так как должна Ну смотри. Идеальный треугольник тут вряд ли сделать из-за СВ, который мне не очень хочется менять, а делать прямое флоу как-то по-детски, соу оставляю, как есть.
4. 04:39:574 (4,5) - я думаю тут надо сделать спейсинг и в точно таких же моментах дальше Я ставил стаки в тех местах, в которых одновременно и рипит не сделаешь, и спейсинг не нужен, так как момент сильно не меняется. Этот - не исключение.
5. 04:49:687 (3,4,5) - Выглядит не так карсиво как остальная карта Клёвый паттерн, не лезь, ты чё хух, мне лично очень нравится.
6. 05:00:473 (6,1) - мне так кажется ты хотел здесь сделать бланкет, но не стал. Я думаю получилось бы не плохо Ыммм, не хотел.
   И выглядело бы ужасно, имхо.
7. 05:17:664 (2) - оверлап, я бы тут запутался куда тыкать. Какой тут оверлап, они стакнуты полностью. Если ещё примахаются - возможно, сменю. Возможно.
8. 05:45:304 (3,4,1) - опять же, как у тебя красиво и идеально ровно выглядит первая половина карты, ну ты же можешь сделать лучше! Триангл есть, вполне идеальный, так что всё тут ровно. К тому же, в заключительном моменте с таким странным ритмом такое вполне неплохо выглядит.

Очень крутая карта, но под конец она немного сливается в плане внешнего вида, в начале она выглядит прям как конфетка ( 00:51:985 (1,2,3) - вот этот момент ну просто я не могу, правда очень круто) а к концу чувствуется что ты устал. Ладно, удачи тебе с ранком! <3

Czarek wrote:

Hi :3

mod

- 00:51:985 (1,2) - try to match it better But hey, this blanket is good already.
- 02:06:140 (1) - place it a little lower 1 pixel blanket what
- 05:21:540 (2) - place this on white lines (05:21:288) - (5:22:383) Don't see any reason because here starts this strange rhythm and continue to all part to end of song.
- try make more diffs (or ask someone to make) I'm lazy to explain this again, look at previous post and find my reason, this set should be 1-diff.
- can i made gd? Not this time.
-sorry that so little but i haven't found more

Skorpiik wrote:

Hello there, here with a mod wut

00:40:861 (2,3) - i'd rotate these 2 so that it follows 00:39:850 (1,4) rotation very hard to rotate without overlaps/ds mistakes, so keep as is
00:45:917 (3) - i think a more linear or simplier shape would fit rest of the map better why bad lol
02:36:477 (2,3,4,5) - adjust this pattern so that the gap between 5's reverse arrow and 2 is the same lenght as gap between 3 and 2 o nice catch
02:46:927 (4,5) - swap those two, i think slider first represents the song better i want to highlight high sound of guitar by circle
04:07:215 (4) - i don't think this slidershape really fits the rest of the map just don't think; 05:07:889 (5) - is the same but without strong shape, looks more ugly than previous
04:35:529 (5,6) - swap those two, i think slider first represents the song better very high sound here so it highlighted by circle
04:56:765 (1,2) - fix blanket hmm

Strategas wrote:

00:45:917 (3) - polish this shape a bit, can see the gap isn't very even oh
03:23:214 (1) - to 03:45:368 (1) - could make this part more dense by having more 1/1 rhythms instead of 2/1, as this part is pretty intense in the music What's wrong with another part. I want to make speed up part as easier as I can, a lot of 1/1 would be very harder. I already set some 1/1 repeat sliders in places where I really hear sounds different from others, there is no much here.

frukoyurdakul wrote:

There are so many good songs from them out there. Why the same song? Idk, i just want to map.

Edit: Sorry I didn't see this is not even 2 stars. btw, ...what? Map. Maybe.

Net0 wrote:

The Merciful
01:36:477 (1,2,3,4,5) - /01:39:174 (1,2,3,4,5) - /01:41:870 (1,2,3,4,5) - I didn't like this much because this pattern makes it seems like it's a repetitive and continous sound that's happening, however here 01:36:477 (1,2,3,4,5) - you have a drum hit 01:36:477 (1) - followed by a main guitar lead 01:36:814 (2) - that's also mapping some 1/4 sounds followed by a cymbal hit 01:37:151 (3) - that happens here 01:37:151 - , the sound of the tail of 01:37:320 - could be undermapped easily imo to avoid the long 1/2 chain 01:36:477 (1,2,3,4,5) - so instead of https://puu.sh/AhoTj.png you could try this rhythm https://puu.sh/AhoSB.png listened without hitsounds, looks cool (and +0.03* lol)

04:31:485 (5,6) - This can be simplified imo without the reverse on 04:31:485 (5) - to avoid the 1/2 gap used here. This gap wasn't really used anywhere on the diff when the intensity of the song was crazy and I think you should make the 1/1 rhythm idea consistent in the entire diff imo here is a lot of high beats that i want to highlight. actually this pattern very similar with 05:08:900 (1,2,3) but with sound through a 1/2 gap

05:16:990 (1,2,3,4) - This idea should be consistent with 05:08:900 (1,2,3,4) - imo, you should ctrol+g this one 05:18:001 (3) - whoops

05:21:035 (1) - Did you try a 1/2 slider here instead of the circle to make sure the gap here 05:21:035 (1,2) - is 1/1? I know the entire section here 05:21:035 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - isn't using the 1/1 rhythm gap but you need a polarity transition imo to make sure players will get into this rhythm only when the sliders will actually start hmm maybe you're right

Let me know when you reply to this o/

Do not qualify any beatmap if you are not yet a full member of the Beatmap Nominators, unless it was nominated by someone who is. This ensures that a full nominator is always part of the process. New nominators become full members after 1-2 months depending on how they did in that period.

Lasse wrote:

Do not qualify any beatmap if you are not yet a full member of the Beatmap Nominators, unless it was nominated by someone who is. This ensures that a full nominator is always part of the process. New nominators become full members after 1-2 months depending on how they did in that period.

tatatat wrote:

some 3/2 or 2/1 breaks within the first half of the map would be nice. its very hard to consistenly play 1/2 rhythm for minutes.. :c or just more breaks in general. For newer players breaks are very important.

Dammond wrote:

03:15:830 - playing with NC, this section is fucked up. NC does wrong accents because you placed the main red bar there 03:14:907 , while the beginning of a measure is a bit further. You have to place a red bar on 03:15:830 to properly handle the NC accents

Gordon123 wrote:

ууу хейтеры налетели uwu
грац o/

100bit wrote:

tatatat wrote:

some 3/2 or 2/1 breaks within the first half of the map would be nice. its very hard to consistenly play 1/2 rhythm for minutes.. :c or just more breaks in general. For newer players breaks are very important.

This part have some moments for breaking your fingers, for example bunch of 2/1 sliders, when you only click on your button and it's all. And 1/2, why? I have 1/1 gaps between almost all objects. Also music on this part doesn't changes so this part mapped on music, not on object placement.
===

Dammond wrote:

03:15:830 - playing with NC, this section is fucked up. NC does wrong accents because you placed the main red bar there 03:14:907 , while the beginning of a measure is a bit further. You have to place a red bar on 03:15:830 to properly handle the NC accents

Hihi, strange that you started talking about NC and switch into object placing. NC here is right - each NC for 4/1 beat, because this part is harder than others. And, i put 1/2 repeat in beginning of rhythm because music let to do it. Also i don't get your words about red bars where i have no objects, sorry.
===

Gordon123 wrote:

ууу хейтеры налетели uwu
грац o/

Thanks lol!

100bit wrote:

tatatat wrote:

some 3/2 or 2/1 breaks within the first half of the map would be nice. its very hard to consistenly play 1/2 rhythm for minutes.. :c or just more breaks in general. For newer players breaks are very important.

This part have some moments for breaking your fingers, for example bunch of 2/1 sliders, when you only click on your button and it's all. And 1/2, why? I have 1/1 gaps between almost all objects. Also music on this part doesn't changes so this part mapped on music, not on object placement.
===

Dammond wrote:

03:15:830 - playing with NC, this section is fucked up. NC does wrong accents because you placed the main red bar there 03:14:907 , while the beginning of a measure is a bit further. You have to place a red bar on 03:15:830 to properly handle the NC accents

Hihi, strange that you started talking about NC and switch into object placing. NC here is right - each NC for 4/1 beat, because this part is harder than others. And, i put 1/2 repeat in beginning of rhythm because music let to do it. Also i don't get your words about red bars where i have no objects, sorry.
===

Gordon123 wrote:

ууу хейтеры налетели uwu
грац o/

Thanks lol!

Dammond wrote:

Sorry for misunderstanding.
NC = NightCore, game mode
This is basically a DT map, that means people will use NightCore as well.
By "accents" I mean the extra chrash cymbals that NightCore does every 4 measures. And they are out of place after 03:15:830 -

1. 00:39:850 (1) - Why exactly, in this section, you didn't hitsound anything? I know this is the calmest part and such but there are guitars playing and they can be emphasized with some hitsounds like whistles on every big downbeat. Leaving the way it is now you end up with 16 unhitsounded seconds and that's really bad feedback wise ):