thanks for the mod, bor!
pyroflayer wrote:top diff (I know you wanted sp but i think some of these are pretty serious to consider) tru
01:05:524 (2,3) - you should check these for sounds, its cool when you have hitsound volume on and seems super fitting, but the song lacks support for this triple, though the song does have support in other places like 01:05:149 - , this is more of a general thing that comes up a lot so I'm just going to point out this one and hope you respond with a general comment as to why its done as much as it is. fixed only this one out of the 3 choruses because this is the only one that doesn't have the drum kick on blue tick.
01:06:368 (6,1,2,3) - this should be simialar to 01:16:868 (5,1,2,3) - because the sound at 01:06:555 - that holds that you don't want to have another slider for exists 01:17:055 - here also, plus the second one would make more sense with the small break in holding (aka no slider) because the vocal is much more staccato. (basically either both should be the same, or make the second link without the sliders and the first one with them.) aaaa i thought of this actually, i wish you weren't right tho. pain in the ass to change, but good point. i'll just remove the awkward double.
01:50:993 (5,6,7,8) - kind of lame but d, if anything to be stacked, it would be the weaker notes in this phrase like 01:50:430 (2,3) - , didn't stack 2 and 3 cuz the piano's notes are different, stacked the drums cuz they sound similar to each other.
02:21:743 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these two should be similar 02:33:743 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - though for this one I think both of these should have sliders instead of the difference.
03:54:368 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not sure this spacing is a fair diff spike, I mean you would get similar emphasis without this drastic difference imo. in terms of fairness, i don't think it's any tougher to hit compared to 02:41:993 (5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - it's just another way to emphasize how strong this end of the chorus is really. The fact that it plays well compensates its spacing anyways IMO.
04:18:805 - double check this, I think sure this is the start of a sound sample but the bluetick seems to be where the start starts. fuk this song lel. but it makes sense to keep it. will ask pishi when he has the time for it.
I also looked at hard and its pretty, I didn't see any mistakes. I also checked hitsounds for delay and they have none :^)