1. Tomorrow (5,09 stars, 1305 notes)

Realazy wrote:

sorry for the wait i mean buen dia compatriota

m4m and stuff

[General]

01:46:631 - could be nice to stop the kiai here and start it again at 01:47:972 - I don't see why since it's all a strong part

[Tomorrow]

00:05:055 (1) - it's a pretty strong crash cymbal, you could maybe space it a bit further than what you have now? also this sounds pretty nice with a finish imo, you could add one?
00:07:066 (5) - maybe this could have the same shape as 00:06:396 (2) to represent better how they're in the same combo and have some contrast with 00:07:401 (1,2) - which are a different combo? maybe, but that just unnecessary imo. I prefer keeping all in the same pattern rather than divide by combo color
00:27:860 (1,2) - these kinda feel out of place when stacked with 00:27:525 (1,2) - because the pitch is different, at least try to ctrl+g them?
00:30:877 (1,2) - pretty big jump here, actually I think it's one of the largest in the map for a not so signifcant part zz can you reduce the spacing a bit?
01:25:513 (1) - this note feels out of place because considering the stacks it clearly shows you're following the guitar, yet having a note here that follows the kick feels too much, besides the jump at 01:25:513 (1,1) - is pretty big considering this stack isn't any stronger than 01:25:178 (1,2) - Don't think this can be considered as a pretty big jump lol I'm also following guitar, but leaving 01:25:513 - feels weirder so yeah
01:26:854 (2) - this (and other strong trumpet sounds like 01:40:262 (2) - and especially 01:44:620 (3,4) - during your kiais) would feel so nice with a slight SV bump meh the trumpet isn't the main focus in my mapping
02:08:418 (3) - could you NC this because of the very high SV change?
02:32:217 - you could've mapped something to this crash it's clickable on 02:30:877 (1,3) - maybe I'll change it after thinking on something else
03:17:469 (1,2) - im sorry for this but that blanket is pretty off
03:24:173 (4,1) - can you move those away from 03:23:502 (2) - so they don't overlap?
03:43:446 (2,3) - these could be moved a bit to the right so the red node is right inside 03:43:111 (1) - 's curve they'd look so close to each other D: I like this pattern
03:48:642 (1) - this shape looks really unpleasant to be honest, and it's also really different to the overall aesthetic of this map, could you do something a little more curvy or with less turns?
03:49:647 (4,1) - could you change 1 a bit to look more like 4?, or more like 03:50:653 (3) - which is more obvious, your choice
03:53:000 (2) - this is pretty cool :D
03:53:837 - this pause is less cool though, everything else in that part is constant 1/2 and there's not really a reason to not map something here since 03:54:005 (1,2) - are mapped to the guitar too i assume
04:12:441 (1,2) - this was awkward to read since you have new combos for 1/1 pauses like 04:11:603 (2,1) - and 04:12:106 (2,1) - but since 04:12:441 (1,2) - are part of the same combo it makes them seem like they're 1/2 jumps That's the idea xd I mean, if you're playing for the very first time you might get confused. After knowing the song you shouldn't D:
04:28:865 (1,1) - hey you could've done something better than copy and ctrl+g 04:24:843 (1,1) - since you have a lot of space available Yeah, I'm surely going to change this xd
05:17:468 (3,5) - shouldn't those be NCs since that's what you do for similar drum based jumps?
05:18:139 (1) - if you apply the NC mentioned previously then you might aswell remove that one since you usually don't place NC in the middle of streams, especially when there's no change in sound for that one Gonna keep the NC because the of the DS change + the overlap
05:54:040 (3) - this looks a bit too curved compared to 4, i think it'd look nicer if you just made it look like the start of 4's curve
06:00:744 (1,2,3) - this really doesn't feel nice to play with such a wide angle especially when most if not all of your other jumps use small angles

good luck!

Ametrin wrote:

nm from my q

mod

[

od9 is a bit high for a 5.15*, so try od8.5 It's already od8 o.o

00:04:049 (1,2) - ctrl+g prefer my current pattern
00:27:860 (1,2) - ^, also 00:28:195 (1,2) -
00:38:168 - add a 1/4 stack with 00:38:252 (1) - You mean a circle? Idk I don't really see why tbh
00:59:368 (5,1) - too close
01:10:430 (1) - ctrl+g to fit the flow actual transition has good flow imo
01:34:229 (1) - ^ ^
01:54:173 (4,5) - ^ ^
02:47:301 (2,3) - ^
03:20:318 (5) - stack with the end of 03:19:647 (2) - why? prefer this way xd
04:26:184 (1) - don't hide the head in the body I don't see anything wrong with that

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi :3

[Tomorrow]
00:50:151 (7,1) i think it's slightly far
02:19:983 (6,4) move slightly left?
03:32:049 (4,1) stack? did something else
04:56:519 (4,1) slightly far the DS is intended for this part since it's a very intense part in the kiai

Nice song ^~^ yeah :3

Asaiga wrote:

Hello, from queue

Mod

Tomorrow

1. I don't want to nitpick your colors choice but 2 relatively the same skyblue colors, with yellow and grey seems a bit off-logic to me. Since you are not going for color hax. In this case one blue color would suffice. And would be neat if YELLOW's satruation gets lowered a bit. yellow and blue are darker now
2. I see these in your tags Asako Miyazaki Misaki Yoshikawa Aya Matsuoka. But you are missing their official Japanese names, it won't hurt adding those :3 sure~
   
3. 00:00:698 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I would make these into 1/2 sliders. Basically this is an intro, you want something easy. Plus it distinguishs the guitar sound and drum better 00:04:720 (1,2,3) -.
   Since you are probably going to apply this might as well reduce spacing here 00:04:720 (1,2,3) - to like 1.90x - 2.00x ds or sth.
   And adjust spacing here so that these 00:05:055 (3,1) - look more like 1/1 time distance spaced. Mmmh single circles like that for an intro is quite easy to approach. I mean both guitar sounds are quite strong so I really want to make them clickable D:
4. 00:06:396 (2,3,2,3) - Rhythm is not really correct here compare with the music. 00:06:396 (2,3) - Should be ctrl+g. Since this note 00:06:731 (3) - has a very faint sound so it's not worth clicking. Meanwhile the redtick has more prominent drum sound, I guess you're right but at the same time wrong. The way I see it is that strong beats such as 00:06:061 - & 00:06:396 - should have a sliderhead in order to have more emphasis. Imo both rhythms are correct, and I'd prefer not to change mine because the whole map is following it.
   00:07:750 (2,3) - Same for this. Fixed these since they're not really following trumpet.
5. 00:08:755 (1,2) - This is a correct variation but 00:09:426 (3) - if you are mapping to the drum then 00:09:258 (2,3) - should be ctrl+g
   00:10:431 (2,3) - same. Rhythm would be much better I'm tipically following melody here through the thrumpet sound. Again I think both rhythms are correct
6. 00:11:940 (2,3) - Here you have it correct. yep, now changed 00:07:750 (2,3) - so it matchs with this. Will keep the others though
7. 00:13:280 (2) - Here the rhythm gets tricky. There is no sound on the white tick until now but then this measure gets a drum sound on this unusual tick. But you chose to map the trumphet instead which you haven't followed since the beginning of the song. So there's something inconsistent here with the rhythm choice. I'm actually following the thrumpet on some beats in order to follow melody as I stated before~
8. 00:14:620 (2,3) - . I think you get the point of this now. Going through the map and fixing these issues would take a lot of effort, I understand that but for the best of your map! Rhythm > flow > aesthetics™ fixed this one!
9. 00:17:469 (3,4,5) - Even if you want to map the trumphet's sound, this 00:17:637 - should be a held note and no drum sound should be mapped here 00:17:805 - . But it's always better to map the drum since it creates better gameplay so ya, I hope it's convincing. still gonna leave the drum hs 00:17:805 - , but changed the rhythm so it follows better the thrumpet
10. 00:24:006 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump is great but this pattern just doesn't follow the music. Music doesn't show any sign of changing here. you,'re right lol fixed~
11. Since music is reaching its climax from this section, may be a good idea to increase spacin'
12. 00:28:027 (2,1) - tbh this can be a 1/2 slider since the synth sound is more prominent here than the drums and it feels better as well, rhythm+gameplay wise. yup
13. 00:28:866 (1,2,3,4) - Not trying to be nazi but this pattern stands pretty out for a normal section of the music. There's notthing too special to make movement like this. Nazii, I like it though s:
14. 00:31:883 (2,3) - that thing again. But this 00:34:229 (1,2) - is safe lol. rhythm variation, both are correct imo :c
15. 00:33:559 (3,3) - Stack error but you probably gonna re-adjust patterns around here anyway
16. 00:38:587 (2,3) - Getting good from here since you start mapping vocal!
17. 00:39:425 (6,7,1) - I get the point of emphasizing vocal on downbeat but this is overmapped. Nah, a simple triplet isn't overmapping at all. The whole map is almost pure 1/2 gap so I wanted to break players gameplay a bit with these
18. 00:47:637 (1,2,3,4) - These finishes can be more spaced.
    00:48:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - But since the drums don't change much, it may be better to keep simple rhythm rather than jump pattern here, except for maybe these 3 - 00:49:984 (6,7,1) -
19. 00:51:298 (4,1) - This transition feels really weak especially since you have jumps here 00:50:628 (2,3) - . And this kind of thing 00:51:298 (4,1) - uses better in techincal maps, here doesn't suit very well. reduced previous slider reverse a bit so gonna keep this + it emphasizes good the wavy guitar sound so yeah
20. 01:07:078 (3,4) - 01:07:581 (6,1) - and 01:08:418 (3,4,5,1) - flowbreak feels awkward here I feel them pretty normal flow
21. 01:25:178 - I think it's better to choose one thing to map only. If you want to map guitar, make 1/2 sliders. If drums, map 1/1 notes. Because mixing these into notes is too dense for this part. Personally I prefer 1/1 notes, they feel better. Yeah but following guitar only make it 01:25:513 - this beat feel a bit empty, therefore I make this have different NC and DS
22. 01:26:519 (1,2,3,4,5) - Rhythm feels like a mess here lol
    01:26:519 (1) - This follows drum
    01:26:854 (2) - This follows trumphet
    01:27:189 (3) - This follows vocal
    01:27:357 (4,5) - These back to drums
    Please determine what you want to follow xd well I guess I'm following drums here...
23. 01:31:882 (1,1,1) - Looks like you want follow vocal. 01:29:871 (3) - Why don't you make this a 1/1 slider as well?
24. 01:33:893 (1,1,1) - Please consult someone else again if you are unsure about keeping this why?
25. 01:36:743 (3) - Shouldn't be clickable why?
26. 01:38:921 (3) - Probably sticking with classic shapes is a better idea here :v :v
27. 01:48:307 (2,3) - Either ctrl+g this or make these a triple for vocal.
    01:50:988 (2,3) - ^
28. 01:55:346 (1,1,1) - Can be arranged better for smoother gameplay. But in case you don't know how, just leave it until someone comes up with something good. I have no idea either yeah xd changed into something smoother
29. 02:03:391 (4,5,6,7) - I don't think this jump here is that necessary, it doesn't go with the music well

A small note. I think you were abit hasty mapping this song. Rhythm you used is something can be found on other generic anime songs but this song uses a tad different rhythm and I think you didn't recognize it fully, you might want to go over the map and recheck this. Aesthetics and flow can be better. Also keep in mind to be a bit more structural.

Once you fix rhythm + polish your map a little bit more. I might not be a big help but you can call me to have a second check.

Sotarks wrote:

Hello, from Q.

[Tomorrow]
00:00:698 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - what i would like to see here is like spacing variation for the intensity of the guitar like 00:00:698 (1,2) - this should be high spaced and then 00:01:368 (1,2,1,2) - decrease here, and up again 00:02:709 (1,2) - here if you see what I mean, it's just to give more feeling that the player is following the guitar. nice nice

so for that part i really don't know what you are trying to follow and the spacing concepts you use, once you follow the trumpets and them claps and then ignore them, just that the consistency is rip here. please at least try and focus something. rip me
00:08:587 (6) - why such small spacing here for that trumpet intensity, better space it more dude. I think 00:08:420 (5) - drum sound should be more emphasized

00:09:761 (4) - try and stack it on 00:08:755 (1) - 's head, you need more spacing for the claps. fixed

00:15:626 (2) - this should be 2 circles dude, clap + trumpet. prefer to follow thrumpet here on 00:15:626 - 00:15:961 - since it's more prominent

00:17:804 (5) - end should be clicable yep fixed on other mod

00:27:525 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - this shouldn't be 12s comboing, since it's same bass rythmn and also 00:28:027 (2,1) - replace this by a 1/2 slider please. ^

ok let's see the rest
00:30:877 (1) - this is like it shouldn't be stacked because of the clap emphasis ... better make a regualr jump. I think stacking is fine.
The real strong sound is on next jump so yeah

00:31:884 (2,3) - ctrl+g this rythmn to follow rythmn propelly, and do this everywhere you ignore the kicks of this song tbh, like rythmn you are using seems so poor compared about the song rythmns can offer you.

00:39:509 (7) - i don't hear any 1/4 beats here, no need to overmap 1/4. same reasoning from previous mod, i want to give some variation + emphasis on these downbeats

01:17:804 (3) - replace this by 2 circles to follow the vocals correctly. yeah

01:38:921 (3) - you are skipping important kick sound here, and that slider feels REALLY out of place man. wanted to follow drum claps there. gonna see how to manage this better

01:41:268 - downbeat skipped makes me wanna cry... : ( changed

01:55:346 (1,1) - mute those slider ends ye

02:46:128 (4,5) - 1/2 slider instead, 02:46:296 (5) - that would be better to not be clickable for the sake following the vocals propely it's actually following vocals imo

03:17:134 (1,1) - please mute those slider ends
05:04:396 (1,1) - ^

ByBy wrote:

from my q

[general]
bg looks pretty squashed imo xd I think it's fine o.o

[tomorrow]
ar 8 - 8.5 would be nice instead of ar 9 why so? I think ar9 is good for a 179bpm 5*
00:01:368 (1,2) - why the spacing suddenly shrinked? the guitar is still intensive as the guitar from 00:00:698 (1,2) - does but this suddenly spacing shrink doesn't emphasize the guitar at all so maybe use the same spacing as you did for the previous pair // 00:02:038 (1) - same here // 00:04:049 (1,2) - because the guitar intensity is changing + I want to give some variation so people can actually follow guitar
00:06:563 (3,4) - i don't get this jump at all why? because on 00:06:899 (4) - where's that 1/2 the sound is weak not so strong like 00:07:066 (5) -'s head (the upbeat) so it's like you just put a jump randomly since there's nothing so strong to emphasize with a jump because that sound is pretty weak and it doesn't need more emphasis as the stronger beats does in conclusion there's no reason to put a jump randomly especially when there's a weak sound so i suggest to decrease a bit the spacing and the jump should be between 00:06:899 (4) - and 00:07:066 (5) - because the upbeat where's 00:07:066 (5) - placed is very stronger and it really needs more emphasis and build-up effect changed in some way
00:08:420 (5,6) - maybe more spacing here? it's pretty obvious that on 00:08:587 (6) - the trumpet is getting more intensive and it needs more emphasis and build-up effect by increasing the spacing here rather than keeping the spacing like it looks now which doesn't give emphasis at all changed into slider
00:19:480 (1,2) - blanket looks off here consider moving 00:19:816 (2) - by 1 grid to left for instance in order to fix the blanket
00:34:229 (1) - i don't think an 1/1 slider would work because the 1/1 tick from 00:34:565 - has a stronger sound and i would like to see it clickable than a sliderend because the sliderend on a stronger sound doesn't emphasize the repspective stronger sound at all but a clickable one would give more emphasis to the stronger sound so it's a big difference here having an 1/2 slider + 1/1 note would work much better here as the 1/1 tick from 00:34:565 - will be clickable same goes for similar rhythms like this one imo it adds some variation to the gameplay + it's supported by vocals so no change
00:39:425 (6,7,1) - here doesn't seems to hear doublets here if you listen the music carefully especially the vocal it looks like the 1/4 tick from 00:39:509 - doesn't follow anything since i don't hear the vocal on the 1/4 tick so i guess you have to delete that note and leave the rhythm only 1/2 note + 1/1 slider yeah... will probably change it
00:40:933 (1) - i don't think this slider fits the music at all because first it increases gradually and then decreases gradually and again increases gradually to the tail so a wave slider would work instead imo
00:44:118 (2,3,4) - looks somehow ridiculous to have the jump between (3)- and (4)- bigger than (2)- and (3)- that 'dokidoki' lyric becomes more pronounced starting from 00:44:286 (3) - and not from 00:44:453 (4) - and also there on (3)- that sound is stronger and on (4)- it's just a weak sound so in conclusion the jump between (3)- and (4)- must be bigger than (2)- and (3)- jump between 3 and 4 is currently bigger than 2 and 3 D:
00:59:703 (1) - this 1/1 slider doesn't even follow the both vocal and instruments (guitar, drums etc.) it just slightly ignore them and also on 01:00:039 - there's a stronger sound but it is emphasized by a sliderend which doesn't give so much emphasis as you think so i would like to replace this 1/1 slider with 3 circles instead to give more emphasis and also to make that stronger sound from 01:00:039 - clickable than a sliderend https://puu.sh/vM1Fv/d9c686f781.jpg fixed
01:02:217 (6,7,1) - same as i said for 00:39:425 (6,7,1) -
01:03:223 (6) - maybe split it in two notes instead? it's pretty obvious that on slider's tail the sound is pretty stronger and it deserves to be clickable than a sliderend because having a note there would give more and more emphasis in comparison with the sliderend which gives less emphasis than you thought actually yeah.. but not because there goes a clap it should be clickable imo, having a slider there fits well too
01:03:558 (1) - mapping here just a simple upbeat slider sound pretty lame because you just slightly ignored the downbeat from 01:03:726 - (that big 1/1 tick) and this gives zero emphasis to the vocal and instruments which is not good having a rhythm which will contain 1/2 note + 1/2 slider would work pretty well in comparison with the upbeat slider which gives zero emphasis that rhythm would make the downbeat from 01:03:726 - clickable than being ignored and it will give more emphasis to the vocal and instruments http://puu.sh/vM22P/42194a8d32.jpg Actually I think that it emphasizes well in terms of vocals, don't know why you say that it gives zero emphasis D: and yeah, I know what a downbeat is xD
01:04:061 (3,4,5) - this is literally the same thing as i said for 00:44:118 (2,3,4) - on (5)- it sounds like a percussion but it's somehow stronger than (4)- which has a weak sound so don't you think that the jump should be higher between (4)- and (5)- instead of (3)- and (4)-? Actually they should have similar DS imo. They that is more emphasized with more DS is 01:04:731 (6) - which I find good
01:07:413 (5,1) - blanket looks pretty off considering moving 01:07:748 (1) - to left 1 grid and maybe make the slider a bit less curved fixed
01:33:223 (1) - its tail is touching the hp bar considering moving the slider a bit down or drag its tail to right to avoid the touch with the hp bar I'm using the default skin and it's not even touch the hp bar o.o
01:33:893 (1,1,1) - too much slider leniency abuse? basically between 01:34:229 (1) - and 01:34:564 (1) - as you can judge from their spacing and also to the flow // 01:55:346 (1,1,1) - same applies here yep, fixed
01:38:418 (1) - pretty weird to see that downbeat from its slidertail it's emphasized by a....sliderend it doesn't emphasize at all since that's the downbeat and it's pretty stronger as you see not a weak sound as the sound from sliderhead is i would split this slider into two circles in order to give more emphasis making that downbeat clickable than a sliderend I'm following vocals there, if I get more complains about it I might change it
01:39:089 (4) - somber ibis LOL anyway would bettter change this slider shape because some players might confuse this one with 1/2 slider pair of 01:38:418 (1) - and also it doesn't flow pretty well try a wave or curved slider for instance
02:08:418 (1,2) - this current rhythm sounds pretty lame because 02:08:418 - has a stronger sound which of course is slightly ignored instead of being emphasized at least you can map a rhythm like this one http://puu.sh/vM3Sr/61c7810b51.jpg to give more emphasis to that stronger sound from 02:08:418 - by making it clickable than just ignoring it for no reason I don't get it, 02:08:418 - & 02:09:089 - are the strongest beat here,
and I made them clickable so yeah
02:09:089 (2) - also i think i would do a 1/1 stack here or increasing the spacing because some players might getting confused here because of reading it as a normal pattern not like a little gap between two hitobjects yeah... but don't really want to make a common rhythm pattern here. At the end it has a NC so it should provide some support to properly read it
02:12:106 (1) - - 02:12:106 (1) - why don't you map this gap? there are some strong sounds (mostly hihats) which needs emphasis not being ignored at it sounds so lame to put a gap just here when the music is easily intensive (the instruments mostly) so it would worth of mapping the gap to emphasize all the stronger hihats present in the song than leave it like this They're very weak imo compared to the next beats so yeah, wanted to give a short pause too
02:22:664 (5) - i don't hear any triplets here in the song if you listen carefully the song it sounds a bit overmapped if you judge the instruments correctly so it supposed to be doublets here not triplets
03:17:134 (1,1,1) - again too much slider leniency abuse mostly between 03:17:469 (1) - and 03:17:804 (1) - because of the spacing and of the flow // 04:42:944 (1,1,1) - same applies here too // 05:04:396 (1,1,1) -
04:14:117 (1) - this note was placed randomly? if yes please don't put it like this it looks untidy imo for example move the note to 342|34 for better vissual aspect
04:24:843 (1) - - 04:32:887 (2) - this whole part is BARELY audible which means that the hitsound doesn't give so much feedback due to low volume (20%) for making this part audible increase the volume to at least 40% for instance in order to make the hitsounds giving more feedback yup, fixed
04:53:000 (1,2,3,4) - hollow wings lol
05:02:385 (1) - this one is touching the hp bar too as 01:33:223 (1) - does here you have to move the slider down or ctrl+j it (that's literally the same thing) // 05:06:407 (1) - this one too Actually this is the only one that is tocuhing the hpbar (according to the default skin) but it so slightly that it isn't necessary imo. It would ruin my pattern and I don't really want that
06:01:079 (1,2,3,1) - this part is very very intensive but you put only 3 circles having each other 1/1 gap making this one lacking of emphasis there are some sounds on these 1/2 ticks which you just ignored them than put at least a note there to give emphasis to the hihats the rhythm should be like this if i'm not wrong http://puu.sh/vM55q/067f32fc7c.jpg to give more emphasis to the hihats and also following them properly I tried it, but don't really want to map so many jumps here. I also think that these are just weaks sounds that aren't very noticeable when playing, so yeah I'd prefer to keep this rhythm

that's all for now you should revise your rhythm and spacing usage imo there are many but didn't say them because it looks pretty useless to repeat the same thing in row in rest everything is good
gl!

Kocari wrote:

Hello from modding queue



[Tomorrow]

00:06:899 (4) - Could also be stacked on 00:07:066 (5) - Gives them a correlation to 00:06:396 (2,3) - but either way is cool Wanted to emphasize 00:07:066 - with some DS instead of stacking, mainly because the 2nd slider has a clap on its head
00:08:252 (4,5) - Ctrl+G rhythm can also work here, even though it does end on so called downbeat it really isn't sufficient since the key instrument that stands out is the trumpet. Want to keep rhythm similary from previous sliders. Both rhythm are correct imo so yeah
00:09:258 (2) - You can stack this on sliderend of 00:08:755 (1) - Reason I didn't like it before was it halted the flow of motion that was already being mapped out and it's not correlating with 00:07:750 (2,3) - as well as 00:06:396 (2,3) - So having a variation where I mentioned would do you a lot of greatness looks great
00:10:934 (4,5) - Same with Ctrl+G rhythm here, it really emphasizes the sounds well with the music if hitsounds were laid out. It sounds really good
00:13:280 (2,3) - Quite rough on the turning her compared to the others. I'd probably rotate (2) more and then it'll feel balanced. Something ~15 degreeish yup, rotated~
00:15:123 (4) - I think it'd be more key to move this slider. It has such strong impact but is forced into a stack 00:12:275 (3,4) - compared to this how it feels meesly and nothing plays here. changed things in some way, should be better now
00:16:632 (6) - Another idea could be turning this into a 1/4 creates a roll into the next slider and has a nice effect to it since it almost feels like it has a crescendo with the music I prefer having a single circle but having more DS to emphasize next downbeat
00:17:469 (3,4) - This I can see as a stack since it's the same trumpet placement in the music. Even though it sounds different it's still played one of the same.
Basically same as this 00:18:475 (2,3) - Rearranged to a stack
00:20:486 (5) - How about stacking this on (3) of the previous note. Adds the same up and down pattern with 00:20:654 (1,2,3) - without having to be placed at an awkward location I remapped this section a bit, so there're more sliders
00:21:827 (5,6) - I think this can be turned into a slider since (6) doesn't really have that much of an impact leaving variation between 00:18:978 (4,5,6) -
Rhythm sounds smoother off the trumpet without having to just put in a lot of single triangle patterns you're right xd change into slider
00:24:173 (3,4,1) - Volume control and be good here with that guitar sound in the music
00:33:727 (4,5) - Wouldn't it be better to have rhythm Ctrl+G here? 00:33:727 (4,5) - the single notes matches with her staccato as she sings and it leaves more of an impact than a slider on her vocals but I do see what you're getting at If I do so, the strong sound of her vocals would match in the slidertail which is something I don't think it's good, mainly because for me slidertails aren't for such emphasized beat
00:44:118 (2,3,4,5,6) - I believe having a pattern that gradually gets smaller is more ideal since (6) seems like an outlier and is more spaced than (3,4,5) which has the most going on in them reduced DS between 5 and 6
01:01:547 (3) - Another idea: You can also extend this to where the next note is placed to fan out that guitar sound and to have a difference between 01:00:206 (3,4) - music wise could work :3
01:30:206 (4,1,2) - Ctrl+G definitely feels better here so the downbeat can utilize a slider covering her vocals I think both rhythms are correct + I'm lazy right now to think of another pattern x.x
01:36:407 (2,3) - Ctrl+G here as well to utilize that trumpet hold because this is mapped on that trumpet sound 01:35:905 (1) - but then the next trumpet sound is on a sliderend which makes 01:36:743 (3,4,5,1) - feel like a run-on with nothing impacting (3) gonna apply on other sections aswell
01:44:955 (4) - Also to review your offset/timing again since it's a little offbeat yeah, shishamo never has perfect timing x.x
01:57:860 (3,4) - Same thing can be applied from ^ here
01:59:703 (4,5) - Ctrl+G here definitely 100% better Idk if you missclicked something, but that definitely would be out of place D: the DS would be waay too much
02:24:843 (4,5,6,7,1) - Such a drastic spacing change compared to how it was in the last verse since it's bigger spacing than what the kiai had fixed
Nothing else would be willing to stand out. It's quite similiar in most aspects. Some of the above can be applied to other areas after this but I'll leave that up to you.

JeZag wrote:

a mod at request of kocari's queue :o but why kocari D:

this plays very very well, so im just pointing out a bunch of alternatives to try out... i mean what more is there to say? ;w;

00:32:554 (5,1) - these two sliders stand out, being sharp amidst curved sliders, but they dont share much in common except being next to each other. i would make 00:32:553 (5) - curve just to fit in with the yellow combo anyway (comparatively, 00:38:252 (1,2,3) - are the same combo and look better)
00:51:298 (4,1) - i would avoid overlap just because its possible (altho maybe you just want overlap to show closeness? idk) anyway i think this looks better:

01:28:363 (2,3,4) - i think this would sound better and play more interestingly as

sure, there is an important and vocal beat on 01:28:530 but in the same vein, 01:29:033 is important too. just try mapping it this way and see whichever you like better tbh I kinda agree with both rhythms... would think about changing it later
01:43:111 (2,3,4) - i would reverse the rhythm here too, cause 01:43:446 seems important here
02:39:759 (4,5) - consider making this a slider for trumpet emphasis? Want to follow vocals here
02:49:983 (2) - see if you can make the tail clickable (both vocal and trumpet here) I think it's fine, would be a lot of circles if I make them both clickable
03:11:603 (2,3,4) - same thing here as before. disregard if you're sticking with this
03:16:128 (4) - feel like this tail should really be click might be, would want to stay consistent with previous kiai section + I don't really feel like it must be clickable
03:54:675 (3,1,3,5) - these are too curved for me tbh but honestly should be fine (its just me prob) maybe i'll change this in the near future xd
04:34:229 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - the DS feels a bit too intense here (doesnt sound like it should have one of the largest jumps in the song but this differs by ear)

ahh this was a pleasure to mod. GL for ranked! <3

Time Capsule wrote:

love the update

heres some words from me
00:27:692 (2,3) - cg (short of ctrl+g) lookgs good
00:28:028 (4) - if you apply ^ make it as https://puu.sh/yPfzu/e8b0aa47f1.png prefer to keep my current pattern tbh
00:30:710 (2,1) - a little bit to left peharps, 2 ~ 3 grid tried
01:07:413 (5) - x220 y308 the angle easier to catch yeah, you're right
01:25:178 (1) - idk but the stack feel not right since it was apply for 01:24:173 (2,4) - maybe you can move (1,2) and stack the selider tail instead of head there but I like how it's currently stacked with 01:24:173 (2,4) - D:
01:45:960 (3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1) - well mapped thanks :3
01:54:843 (2,3) - cg rhythm fixed
02:25:178 (6) - stack at 02:24:005 (1) - head would increase the ds by a lot, so prefer my current pattern
03:02:553 (4,5) - cg rhythm i feel like this rhythm is fine cause it matches vocals and strong beat 03:02:720 -
03:54:675 - this section could be better for trumpet emphasis imo, such using 3/4 slider or make tail triplet i know, but sadly the trumpet is off to the music so don't really know how else to manage it
04:03:893 (4) - stak with 04:01:547 (5) - for visual they're way too far in timeline to stack them, don't really makes any change in visuals imo
04:06:659 (3) - if you wereuse this for trumpet emph ill say the same for 03:58:614 - 04:00:290 - 04:03:306 - 04:00:290 - added a circle there
04:33:390 - this worth to map with 1/2 slider applied
05:07:580 (5) - stack at 05:08:418 (3) - head kk
05:17:804 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - best part on map <3
05:27:692 (6) - half overlap imo idk what do you mean by that D:

Chaoslitz wrote:

m4m

[Tomorrow]

1. 00:20:151 (3,4) - Could lower the spacing here, sound on 00:20:319 doesn't need such emphasis yep, reduced a bit
2. 00:31:548 (1,2,3,4,5) - would be nice to make this pattern parallel like 00:32:889 (1,2,3,4,5) lol nice catch lol
3. 00:43:616 (1,2) - Same as 00:20:151 (3,4), you can ctrl+g 00:43:616 (1) to lower the spacing between 00:43:616 (1,2) yeah that's better
4. 00:49:481 (3,4) - ^ fixed
5. 01:11:603 (4,1) - unstack this, doesn't look good when stack 01:10:932 (2,3) but in same combo doesn't look bad stacked, but yeah,
   unstacking could feel better
6. 01:16:798 (1) - try sv around 1.8x? i dont think players can be aware of this the first time tried changing it, but since 01:17:134 (1) - is x1,0 it would ruin the symmetry-pattern between 01:16:798 (1,1) -. Also I think that after a few tries, players should learn about this pattern, it isn't hard,
   just might be a bit confusing the first time, which isn't that of a problem imo
7. 01:32:888 (4,1) - larger distance for new combo? 01:33:223 (1) - cltr+g this for more distance
8. 01:51:826 (6,1) - similar problem as above, you can stack 01:51:826 (6) on 01:51:156 (3) so that the emphasis will goes to 01:51:826 (6,1) instead of 01:51:491 (5,6) did something else so the ds isn't that huge for both objects
9. 02:43:949 (6,2) - fix stack fixed
10. 03:00:062 (1) - Same as 01:16:798 (1) same
11. 03:52:999 - can add finish to emphasize the instrument nice idea
12. 04:04:061 (5,6) - well yea too large with nothing strong to emphasize lol yeah, moved so it now blankets 04:03:893 (4) -
13. 04:06:407 (2,3) - spacing is too large when compare to 1/4 patterns like 04:00:290 (5,6) yeah but if we consider the slider leniency,
    players don't actually move their cursor till the very end of the slider, it's like literally going from the head of 04:06:407 (2) - to 04:06:659 (3) - which has similar ds as 03:59:871 (4,5) -
14. 04:09:089 (2,3) - ctrl+g for better flow between, also 04:09:424 has no sounds so the spacing shouldn't be too large rotated 04:08:754 (1) - and ctrl+ged 04:09:089 (2) - , should be fine now
15. 04:27:524 (1) - doesnt look good when the two curves are different and the slider head is overlapping with end :< moved a bit
16. 04:30:206 (1) - slider between 2nd and 3rd red anchor is curved too much imo xD redid this shape lol, didn't like it tbh
17. 04:42:944 (1,1) - spacing is too large when compare similar patterns imo yes, they are larger mainly because of the last kiai, however 05:25:848 (1,1) - these had same low spacing, so now I added more space between them, so now should be more consistent with this part in the 3rd kiai

Map is fine but im not sure if the timing is accurate enough, timing such as 03:25:848 is seems delayed, you may want to find someone to confirm (sorry im not experienced in timing)
call me back if timing is confirmed~

1. 02:55:849 - add red line here to match 02:56:375 -
2. 03:20:475 - added redline here
3. 03:28:529 - ^
4. 05:41:257 - ^
5. 05:51:983 - here to match 05:52:699 -

Mir wrote:

🗯🗯

00:15:458 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - movement plays rly weird here, would make 2,3 just straight tbh yeah it was a bit weird, did something
00:50:628 - wrong snap, should be https://i.imgur.com/yEBzs3Q.png or something, this isn't 1/4 and it sounds really bad as it is omg yes,
tbh was trying to figure out how to fix this, and I just came out with the idea to follow the metronome, thanks for this suggestion c:
01:26:192 (1) - feel like a slow slider entry would be cooler, maybe 0.3x want to emphasize that section without a slow slider, like... it'd kill the current intensity it was towards 01:26:527 (1) -
01:47:644 (1,2,1) - at least can you make the flow change, staying the same direction while this strong note plays as the jumps before is just really boring imo well there's people that think otherwise (apart from me xd) Anyway, I don't think it's boring at all, it's pretty catchy to follow that pattern for me tbh
02:13:454 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - could nc this in 3s or make a pattern based on 3s like you did with 01:46:639 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - sure
02:36:248 (1) - can you fix this wave to be cuter https://i.imgur.com/7VA1kh8.png for me it's fine, but did something
02:55:849 (3) - nc for trumpets? yes
03:52:998 (2) - cute :3
04:01:713 (6) - more emphasis imo I don't think it's really necessary to emphasize that
04:03:305 - skipping this? could make 1/4 slider for 04:03:221 - alright
04:06:406 - worst sax solo i've ever heard in my life holy shit LOL no uwu
04:27:523 (1) - why is this not even pls fix ty it wasn't supposed to be even, but considering other shapes, now it is XD
04:57:355 (2) - not a fan of how this trumpet gets barely any emphasis throughout the whole map, it's like.. late syncopation or something and stands out a lot at this point it would mean I'd had to remap a lot of things + it doesn't really stands out for me, like I emphasize several other parts,
but didn't felt like I should do on that specific trumpet sounds
05:38:920 (3) - maybe nc? i think it's fine to have those 3 as combo

also im popping for the timing at the end that is messed up lol - most of the drums are off, would recommend to get someone to check it before you get a rebubble

i dont really feel like im interested in nominating the set though, sorry. good luck with this np, danke danke c:

2018-01-10 20:32 iYiyo: hihi, can you take a super duper quick look at the timing to confirm? pliiis >.<
2018-01-10 20:32 iYiyo: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1240086 SHISHAMO - Ashita mo]
2018-01-10 20:32 iYiyo: just the very end
2018-01-10 20:32 Mir: sure
2018-01-10 20:33 iYiyo: thanks dude
2018-01-10 20:33 Mir: 05:54:039 (3) - is a bit early
2018-01-10 20:34 Mir: other than that
2018-01-10 20:34 iYiyo: oh, but is't like only that beat 
2018-01-10 20:34 Mir: looks fine
2018-01-10 20:34 iYiyo: cause 05:54:206 (4) -  looks fine to me
2018-01-10 20:34 Mir: yeah i guess you can leave that actually
2018-01-10 20:35 iYiyo: alright
2018-01-10 20:35 iYiyo: thanks mir :3

Chromoxx wrote:

hi

00:30:877 (1,2) - these kinda feel less connected than 00:30:710 (2,1) - due to how you stacked these notes, so i'd suggest some type of pattern which connects 1,2 better visually unstacked 00:30:710 (2,1) - so it feels a bit smoother now
01:13:790 (3,4) - maybe make these to something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10045411 for more emphasis on the drum pitch going down? would be kinda cool imo tried to do something else from what you mentioned, but it didn't convinced me D: I think it's better to keep the distance as how it is now, so you can follow the rhythm with this "oh oh oh" on vocals, which I personaly think is fun to play :3
02:19:153 (2,5,6) - spacing between these is pretty uneven so i'd suggest placing 02:19:153 (2,3) - more central between 02:19:823 (5,6) - yup, fixed
04:24:841 (1) - 04:27:523 (1) - 04:30:204 (1) - just intrigued whether these sliders are supposed to symbolize something or you just made shapes you thought were cool? they don't symbolize anything in particular xD just random ideas I tried with slider shapes while trying to keep some symmetry


looks good in general... pretty short mod since everything is clean, stuff i pointed out is also only subjective stuff i felt would be cool

call me back ^^

pkhg wrote:

buen dia compatriota

698,335.195530726257,4,2,0,40,1,0
7750,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
8755,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
50628,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
52003,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
53008,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
107620,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
107955,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
108310,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
109660,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
115040,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
121050,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
124060,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
125050,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
125395,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
127415,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
128075,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
128260,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
175849,350.877192982456,4,2,1,40,1,0
176375,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
180374,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
200475,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
208529,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
341257,335.195530726257,4,2,1,40,1,0
351983,358.208955223881,4,2,1,50,1,0
352699,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
353369,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
361430,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
362120,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0

Sotarks wrote:

01:56:024 - you might wanna check this section it's early 20ms imo.
02:03:063 (2,5) - and those clap are late as well..
you might need to double check timing here, lots of stuff needs more resets.

those are the timing line you need to add, i didn't checked the whole song 'cause i'm lazy but yea this might get checked.

698,335.195530726257,4,2,0,40,1,0
7750,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
8755,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
50628,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
52003,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
53008,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
107620,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
107955,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
108310,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
109660,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
115040,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
121050,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
124060,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
125050,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
125395,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
127415,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
128075,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
128260,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
175849,350.877192982456,4,2,1,40,1,0
176375,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
180374,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
200475,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
208529,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,1
341257,335.195530726257,4,2,1,40,1,0
351983,358.208955223881,4,2,1,50,1,0
352699,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
353369,335.195530726257,4,2,1,50,1,0
361430,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0
362120,335.195530726257,4,2,1,60,1,0

this is only one kiai i'm really lazy to do more, because maybe it's multi bpm, those are just resets where it's late or early because this drummer has aids