Not sure if I'm a fan of the SV changes tbqh
00:07:928 (7928|0) - is the same pitch as 00:08:273 (8273|1,8790|1,9135|1) - so consider selecting those and ctrl+left arrow. ctrl + left arrow these as well 00:08:445 (8445|2,8618|3). Just for better pitch relevancy. Might need to fix the resulting jack at the end though
approve00:29:825 (29825|3) - There's a bunch of these sounds in this section (the strings) that you could perhaps map with LNs to avoid the section becoming a repetitive drum fest
not too many of these emphasized so I feel its a small enough section to have them00:33:445 (33445|1) - As an alternative to above, you could also emphasize these....bells? I don't know what they are. You could also do both.
I feel the chimes get better emphasis on the slower parts00:44:480 (44480|1) - now if there's a place for SV changes, this would be great. Can really do a lot of things here. An example would be 1.5x on the downbeat, 0.5x on the upbeat and then 1x on the start of the next measure where the LN is. This makes it so the next LN appears right when the voice says the second syllable.
I agree but I want to keep the SV intuitive so I would have to add it to all other similiar sounds. I don't like the idea of constant SV through out the map.00:51:980 (51980|2) - Ghost note, could replace it with an LN
dun00:54:480 (54480|1) - If you're gonna map the 1/4 before this note, might as well map the ones after it too
actually totally missed these00:59:307 (59307|3) - Shouldn't this be an LN? :thinking:
yeee01:12:411 (72411|3,72583|3,72756|3) - Try to avoid stacks like this unless you have a reason for (e.g pitch or something). Plays better without them and doesn't strain the hand as much
only reason was to prep for the next pattern but I guess I can make it prettier01:18:618 (78618|2,78618|1) - This snare is a double but 01:19:307 (79307|2) - this snare is a single :thinking:. more examples like this through the map. Stay consistent
the layering is for 1 note for each instrument on that part.keeping consistant would mean either triples on either drum or unstable mapping for keyboard. neither of which I feel comfortable with. maybe kb gets nerfed"fuck yo scrollspeed" (this is mean)
barely noticeable :thinking:01:41:118 (101118|3) - I like here how you've done the break here
http://i.imgur.com/QAtejaR.png because it fits extremely well with the music. Consider repeating it on the next "reset" on the upbeat after the measure start
01:51:721 (111721|1) - This either starts on the red tick or the blue but definitely not the white (maybe even 1/6)
it might, but imo the sound really pops out on the white01:59:652 (119652|2,119652|0,119652|3,120342|3,120342|1,120342|0) - Why are these both triples? There's no stronger sound that indicates that they should be more than doubles like the rest
aesthethics, cheese, intuitive patterning, stuff. will change doe02:02:411 (122411|1) - ^
cymbal, snare, kick.02:23:790 (143790|0) - ooo man some uninherited stuttering here would be so sick. Shame it's unrankable
I feel you. I tried diffirent stuff but decided against it afterwards02:37:583 (157583|2) - Consider spicing up this section by mapping the "whistles" (?)
Imo the buildup feels better with the current setup. If I end up changing the part, I'll def consider this02:50:169 (170169|2,170342|2,170514|2,170687|2,170859|2,171032|2) - Try to avoid anchors longer than 4. Can be really straining
this little wouldnt even kill a fly ya pansy03:09:652 (189652|0,189652|2,190342|1) - Seeing upbeat snares not all be doubles physically pains me (if i come back and these aren't fixed, I'm disowning you)
Guess I'm disowned. Reason being the current layering as mentioned before. Might change in the future03:43:273 (223273|2) - Feels like it gets so quiet here that the streams feel like overmapping. They're not because there's clearly a sound, but for the theme of the map, I don't think they fit. Maybe have them slowly filter out instead of all at once?
interesting idea. i shall experiment with that