Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

TOMOSUKE x Jazzin'park - LANA - Kiroku no Kakera (sasakure.U

posted
Total Posts
15
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Mittwoch, 19. April 2017 at 16:11:44

Artist: TOMOSUKE x Jazzin'park
Title: LANA - Kiroku no Kakera (sasakure.UK Framework Remix) -
Source: jubeat saucer
Tags: sasakure uk
BPM: 200
Filesize: 4103kb
Play Time: 01:54
Difficulties Available:
  1. Andi's NM - 4Key (2,18 stars, 550 notes)
  2. EZ - 4Key (1,72 stars, 401 notes)
  3. HD - 4Key (2,88 stars, 796 notes)
  4. MX - 4Key (3,45 stars, 883 notes)
Download: TOMOSUKE x Jazzin'park - LANA - Kiroku no Kakera (sasakure.UK Framework Remix) -
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Ready for mods

EZ - done
NM - done by MrAndix3
HD - done
MX - done

to do: hitsounding done

Thanks for the mods
Asherz007
imtdb1
CrumpetFiddler
Alberiansyah
Last edited by Rammler , edited 12 times in total.
Asherz007
Beatmap Nominator
687 posts
Joined September 2016
Asherz007
Yo. M4M(s) from #modreqs :)

Ah... LNs, my worst enemy. :P

If there is anything in here that you don't agree with, feel free to reject it, but please explain why you have done so, so that other mappers can understand your intentions.

General
Nothing much to say here, to be honest. Just don't forget about hitsounding. (It's not enough to just change the volume every now and again.) :)

That being said, with current ranking requirements, every map needs a difficulty under 2*. Consider making one or finding someone for a GD.

0|1|2|3

Andi's NM
Overall, it's nicely mapped, though there are some changes I would like to suggest. (It looks long, but that's because I write a lot.)

A general point would be before I go on would be that there are some areas where I feel that it's not clear as to what the notes are trying to follow. Within a pattern, try to maintain following one thing, like the vocals or the piano, but try not to switch mid-phrase, as it can be a little jarring to newer players. I'm not going to mention every tiny detail, but have a look again at the map with this thought in mind.

  1. 00:10:397 (10397|0,10472|1,10547|2,10622|3) - To me, this feels a little bit like an overmap here. For a relatively calm section of the song, I don't think it needs a 1/4 ministream. A possible alternative would just be to remove this and extend the LN by 1 beat.
  2. 00:10:997 - I feel like you should map something here since you want to follow the vocals in the small section afterwards.
  3. 00:13:397 (13397|0) - Ghost note (every note in mania should be mapped to something. This one isn't). Remove it.
  4. 00:13:697 (13697|3,13847|1) - ^ (You could probably get away with the second one, considering the pitch change in the vocals)
  5. 00:14:447 (14447|2) - ^
  6. 00:15:497 (15497|2,15497|0,15947|3,15947|1,16697|3,16697|0,17147|1,17147|2) - Consider making one of these LNs in each pair a normal note, since there is only one long sound with one short one in the audio every time.
  7. 00:20:297 (20297|3) - Make a double instead of a single (LN ends don't really count as a note)
  8. 00:27:497 (27497|0) - Double for consistency?
  9. 00:30:947 (30947|2) - Ghost note
  10. 00:38:447 (38447|0,39197|0) - I wouldn't do this (LN shielding) at this difficulty. Newer players may find something like this a little difficult to play, so consider moving the note after the LN into a different column.
  11. 00:39:497 (39497|3,39797|2,40097|1,40247|0) - This is semi-unclear as to what you want to follow here. I assume you're trying to follow the vocals, so I reckon you'd need another note at 00:40:547.
  12. 00:43:097 (43097|1,43097|0,43247|3,43697|0,43847|1,43997|2,44147|3,44147|1,44297|2,44297|0) - This feels a little mis-mapped in my opinion. I'm not entirely sure what you want to follow here. Also play-wise it makes sense, the readability isn't as great as it could be, consider remapping this small section.
  13. 00:54:347 (54347|2) - Move to col 1?
  14. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (where which column a note falls in corresponds to the pitch of the thing you're trying to follow) For example, you could do something like this at 00:51:497. By no means is this obligatory, but I thought it might be nice. :)
  15. 01:03:197 (63197|2) - Move to col 3 to avoid LN shield?
  16. 01:06:947 (66947|1,66947|2,66947|3) - A triple is a little too much here imo. Consider reducing to a double.
  17. 01:09:947 (69947|3,69947|2,70097|1,70247|0,70247|2,70397|1,70547|0,70547|2,70697|3,70697|1) - In respect to the music, this doesn't really follow it correctly. Something simpler would do the trick here.
  18. 01:12:197 (72197|0,72197|1,72197|2) - Reduce to double?
  19. 01:19:547 (79547|1,79547|0,79697|2,79847|3,79847|1,79997|2,80147|0,80147|3,80297|1,80297|2) - I don't think this follows the musical emphasis properly either.
  20. 01:28:997 (88997|0,89147|1,89147|3,89297|2,89447|3,89447|1,89597|0,89747|2,89747|1,89897|0,89897|3) - ^ (I'll stop mentioning these but there are a couple more.)
  21. 01:36:497 (96497|1,96647|1,96797|1) - Definitely not a good idea to do this. I'd remove one of the LNs surronding these three notes and then put each on in a different column.
  22. 01:35:897 (95897|2,96947|2) - LN shield (move note to a different column?)
  23. 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2) - 2 LNs (making the triple) is a little too much. Consider removing one of these.
This ended up being quite wordy and long, but I hope you'll find it useful.

HD
You may want to change this difficulty to OD 7.5, HP 7.5.
  1. 00:10:097 - Have an LN start in col 3 and remove 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2)?
  2. 00:13:247 (13247|2,13397|1,13697|2,13847|1,14147|3) - Ghost notes (see EZ diff for explanation if needed)
  3. 00:14:597 (14597|2) - Should this be at 00:14:447, where the vocal note starts?
  4. 00:15:347 (15347|1) - Move to col 2?
  5. 00:18:947 (18947|2,18947|1,18947|0) - I think you should remove one of these LNs. It's not wrong, but 00:20:297 needs more emphasis than just a single.
  6. 00:29:897 (29897|0,31397|3,34997|0,36197|3) - (and many more) I'm not understanding what you're mapping these LNs to. There's no sound that lasts the entire duration of this, so consider restructuring these sections.
  7. 00:30:797 (30797|2,30947|3) - Ghost notes
  8. 00:35:597 (35597|3,35747|2) - ^
  9. 00:39:047 (39047|2,39047|3,39197|0,39197|1,39347|3,39347|2) - Doubles feel a little too much here.
  10. 00:39:647 (39647|2,40397|2) - Ghost notes
  11. You miss the vocal change at 00:48:197. Perhaps another LN here? (and release one of the others)
  12. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (see EZ diff for more info)
  13. 00:49:547 (49547|3) - End at 00:49:697?
  14. 00:50:747 (50747|1) - End at 00:50:897?
  15. 00:51:047 (51047|2) - Make 1/2-beat LN?
  16. 00:53:147 (53147|0) - End at 00:53:297?
  17. 00:56:297 (56297|3) - This is mapped to mostly silence.
  18. 00:59:897 (59897|0,59897|1) - 1/4 LNs don't fit here. Probably better to be normal notes. (And many more that I won't mention.)
  19. 01:07:097 - Don't leave this bit blank. Unless it's impossible not to, mania maps should not have breaktimes in.
  20. 01:10:697 (70697|1) - Double for pattern
  21. LN at 01:12:197 to represent held piano sound?
  22. 01:17:297 (77297|1,77447|2,77597|3,77747|0) - Why these LNs? Continue to map the stream. Or make the entire measure like these LNs.
  23. 01:23:297 (83297|1,83297|3) - Too much emphasis here. I think this should be a single and the double should be at 01:23:147, 1/2 beat earlier.
  24. 01:24:197 (84197|3,84272|2,84347|1,84422|0,84497|1,84572|2,84647|3,84797|2,84947|1) - Either maps as 1/4 stream or 1/2 stream, not both.
  25. 01:32:072 (92072|2,92222|0) - Ghost notes
  26. 01:39:947 (99947|3,100097|2,100097|1) - Double on first hl, single on second (emphasis) (Many more like this as well.)
  27. 01:53:897 (113897|2,113897|3,113897|0,113897|1,114347|3,114347|2,114347|0,114347|1,114797|1,114797|0,114797|3,114797|2) - Quads here is too much here; you can't accurately represent the note change in the piano. Consider reducing to triples.

MX
Alright, I'm not going to do a full mod on this difficulty, as it is too similar to HD for my liking (see HD for more or less the same issues), with the star rating buffed by two overly difficult sections. I still think that this map can support something of this difficulty, but the other parts would just need to be a little harder.

There are a few issues that are unique to this diff, so I'll try to list them here. (There's a general misemphasis throughout, and it would be too long to point them all out.)
  1. 00:01:097 (1097|0,3497|3,5897|0) - (and so on) LNs mapped to silence again.
  2. 00:38:372 (38372|1,38447|0,38522|3) - You start the 1/4 stream one beat too early in my opinion.
  3. 00:43:997 (43997|3,43997|2,44147|0,44147|1,44297|3,44297|1,44297|2) - Double-double-triple feels a little too much. How about single-single-double instead?
  4. 00:49:097 (49097|0,51497|3) - More silent LNs here.
  5. 01:45:497 (105497|2,105497|3,105647|2,105647|1,105797|0,105797|2,105947|1,105947|3,106097|3,106097|0,106247|1,106247|2) - Map the 1/4 stream instead here?

If there's anything you don't understand, feel free to PM me in-game or in the forums.

Hope this helped and best of luck! :)
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler

Asherz007 wrote:

Yo. M4M(s) from #modreqs :)

Ah... LNs, my worst enemy. :P

If there is anything in here that you don't agree with, feel free to reject it, but please explain why you have done so, so that other mappers can understand your intentions.

General
Nothing much to say here, to be honest. Just don't forget about hitsounding. (It's not enough to just change the volume every now and again.) :) for me it sounds okay the way it is but you're right I should probably do that

That being said, with current ranking requirements, every map needs a difficulty under 2*. Consider making one or finding someone for a GD.gonna make one in the next few days

0|1|2|3

Andi's NM
Overall, it's nicely mapped, though there are some changes I would like to suggest. (It looks long, but that's because I write a lot.)

A general point would be before I go on would be that there are some areas where I feel that it's not clear as to what the notes are trying to follow. Within a pattern, try to maintain following one thing, like the vocals or the piano, but try not to switch mid-phrase, as it can be a little jarring to newer players. I'm not going to mention every tiny detail, but have a look again at the map with this thought in mind.

  1. 00:10:397 (10397|0,10472|1,10547|2,10622|3) - To me, this feels a little bit like an overmap here. For a relatively calm section of the song, I don't think it needs a 1/4 ministream. A possible alternative would just be to remove this and extend the LN by 1 beat.
  2. 00:10:997 - I feel like you should map something here since you want to follow the vocals in the small section afterwards.
  3. 00:13:397 (13397|0) - Ghost note (every note in mania should be mapped to something. This one isn't). Remove it.
  4. 00:13:697 (13697|3,13847|1) - ^ (You could probably get away with the second one, considering the pitch change in the vocals)
  5. 00:14:447 (14447|2) - ^
  6. 00:15:497 (15497|2,15497|0,15947|3,15947|1,16697|3,16697|0,17147|1,17147|2) - Consider making one of these LNs in each pair a normal note, since there is only one long sound with one short one in the audio every time.
  7. 00:20:297 (20297|3) - Make a double instead of a single (LN ends don't really count as a note)
  8. 00:27:497 (27497|0) - Double for consistency?
  9. 00:30:947 (30947|2) - Ghost note
  10. 00:38:447 (38447|0,39197|0) - I wouldn't do this (LN shielding) at this difficulty. Newer players may find something like this a little difficult to play, so consider moving the note after the LN into a different column.
  11. 00:39:497 (39497|3,39797|2,40097|1,40247|0) - This is semi-unclear as to what you want to follow here. I assume you're trying to follow the vocals, so I reckon you'd need another note at 00:40:547.
  12. 00:43:097 (43097|1,43097|0,43247|3,43697|0,43847|1,43997|2,44147|3,44147|1,44297|2,44297|0) - This feels a little mis-mapped in my opinion. I'm not entirely sure what you want to follow here. Also play-wise it makes sense, the readability isn't as great as it could be, consider remapping this small section.
  13. 00:54:347 (54347|2) - Move to col 1?
  14. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (where which column a note falls in corresponds to the pitch of the thing you're trying to follow) For example, you could do something like this at 00:51:497. By no means is this obligatory, but I thought it might be nice. :)
  15. 01:03:197 (63197|2) - Move to col 3 to avoid LN shield?
  16. 01:06:947 (66947|1,66947|2,66947|3) - A triple is a little too much here imo. Consider reducing to a double.
  17. 01:09:947 (69947|3,69947|2,70097|1,70247|0,70247|2,70397|1,70547|0,70547|2,70697|3,70697|1) - In respect to the music, this doesn't really follow it correctly. Something simpler would do the trick here.
  18. 01:12:197 (72197|0,72197|1,72197|2) - Reduce to double?
  19. 01:19:547 (79547|1,79547|0,79697|2,79847|3,79847|1,79997|2,80147|0,80147|3,80297|1,80297|2) - I don't think this follows the musical emphasis properly either.
  20. 01:28:997 (88997|0,89147|1,89147|3,89297|2,89447|3,89447|1,89597|0,89747|2,89747|1,89897|0,89897|3) - ^ (I'll stop mentioning these but there are a couple more.)
  21. 01:36:497 (96497|1,96647|1,96797|1) - Definitely not a good idea to do this. I'd remove one of the LNs surronding these three notes and then put each on in a different column.
  22. 01:35:897 (95897|2,96947|2) - LN shield (move note to a different column?)
  23. 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2) - 2 LNs (making the triple) is a little too much. Consider removing one of these.
This ended up being quite wordy and long, but I hope you'll find it useful.

HD
You may want to change this difficulty to OD 7.5, HP 7.5. sure why not
  1. 00:10:097 - Have an LN start in col 3 and remove 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2)? I think you meant 00:10:397 (10397|1) - and yeah I'll do that
  2. 00:13:247 (13247|2,13397|1,13697|2,13847|1,14147|3) - Ghost notes (see EZ diff for explanation if needed) changed the whole thing into something more fitting to the music
  3. 00:14:597 (14597|2) - Should this be at 00:14:447, where the vocal note starts? removed this note as well
  4. 00:15:347 (15347|1) - Move to col 2? nah i think these are fine as they are right now
  5. 00:18:947 (18947|2,18947|1,18947|0) - I think you should remove one of these LNs. It's not wrong, but 00:20:297 needs more emphasis than just a single. you're right I'll change that
  6. 00:29:897 (29897|0,31397|3,34997|0,36197|3) - (and many more) I'm not understanding what you're mapping these LNs to. There's no sound that lasts the entire duration of this, so consider restructuring these sections. I guess I wanted to emphasize these parts a little but you're right I think I'll just remove them and restructure the whole thing. but im gonna leave the one's there that are following the sound of the vocals since they are fitting
  7. 00:30:797 (30797|2,30947|3) - Ghost notes I don't think these are exactly ghost notes since they are based upon the map's rhythm. Not sure how to explain it but they are completely fine imo
  8. 00:35:597 (35597|3,35747|2) - ^ ^
  9. 00:39:047 (39047|2,39047|3,39197|0,39197|1,39347|3,39347|2) - Doubles feel a little too much here.oke
  10. 00:39:647 (39647|2,40397|2) - Ghost notes same explanation as above
  11. You miss the vocal change at 00:48:197. Perhaps another LN here? (and release one of the others) nice idea
  12. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (see EZ diff for more info) tbh I like this part as it is. you had a really nice idea there but I think im gonna keep it like it is rn
  13. 00:49:547 (49547|3) - End at 00:49:697? what
  14. 00:50:747 (50747|1) - End at 00:50:897? hell no
  15. 00:51:047 (51047|2) - Make 1/2-beat LN? hm a LN would indeed be more fitting but I personally think that a single note looks and feels better here. If this occurs in any future mods ill consider changing it
  16. 00:53:147 (53147|0) - End at 00:53:297? nop
  17. 00:56:297 (56297|3) - This is mapped to mostly silence. I think this LN was supposed to emphasize the slight change in the music but I think I'll just remove it
  18. 00:59:897 (59897|0,59897|1) - 1/4 LNs don't fit here. Probably better to be normal notes. (And many more that I won't mention.) aw oke
  19. 01:07:097 - Don't leave this bit blank. Unless it's impossible not to, mania maps should not have breaktimes in. filled the part with 2 LNs
  20. 01:10:697 (70697|1) - Double for pattern yes
  21. LN at 01:12:197 to represent held piano sound? nice. added a chord at the end of it too
  22. 01:17:297 (77297|1,77447|2,77597|3,77747|0) - Why these LNs? Continue to map the stream. Or make the entire measure like these LNs. guess I didnt want to make the diff too hard but you're right this feels weird to play. gonna change it into one stream
  23. 01:23:297 (83297|1,83297|3) - Too much emphasis here. I think this should be a single and the double should be at 01:23:147, 1/2 beat earlier. Gonna leave this as it is because these notes follow the vocals and not the background noises
  24. 01:24:197 (84197|3,84272|2,84347|1,84422|0,84497|1,84572|2,84647|3,84797|2,84947|1) - Either maps as 1/4 stream or 1/2 stream, not both. yes
  25. 01:32:072 (92072|2,92222|0) - Ghost notes I think this is completely fine
  26. 01:39:947 (99947|3,100097|2,100097|1) - Double on first hl, single on second (emphasis) (Many more like this as well.) same answer as above
  27. 01:53:897 (113897|2,113897|3,113897|0,113897|1,114347|3,114347|2,114347|0,114347|1,114797|1,114797|0,114797|3,114797|2) - Quads here is too much here; you can't accurately represent the note change in the piano. Consider reducing to triples. oke

MX
Alright, I'm not going to do a full mod on this difficulty, as it is too similar to HD for my liking (see HD for more or less the same issues), with the star rating buffed by two overly difficult sections. I still think that this map can support something of this difficulty, but the other parts would just need to be a little harder.

There are a few issues that are unique to this diff, so I'll try to list them here. (There's a general misemphasis throughout, and it would be too long to point them all out.)
  1. 00:01:097 (1097|0,3497|3,5897|0) - (and so on) LNs mapped to silence again. yeah I fixed that entire part just like I did in the HD diff
  2. 00:38:372 (38372|1,38447|0,38522|3) - You start the 1/4 stream one beat too early in my opinion. you're right
  3. 00:43:997 (43997|3,43997|2,44147|0,44147|1,44297|3,44297|1,44297|2) - Double-double-triple feels a little too much. How about single-single-double instead? this is supposed to be the hardest diff in my mapset so nope
  4. 00:49:097 (49097|0,51497|3) - More silent LNs here. fixed these and the ones at 01:08:297 (68297|2) -
  5. 01:45:497 (105497|2,105497|3,105647|2,105647|1,105797|0,105797|2,105947|1,105947|3,106097|3,106097|0,106247|1,106247|2) - Map the 1/4 stream instead here? I like this as it is right now so nope sorry
    I also fixed the silent part with 2 LNs like I did in the HD diff

If there's anything you don't understand, feel free to PM me in-game or in the forums.

Hope this helped and best of luck! :)
Sorry for using such a bright green :^)
Thanks a lot for the mod you were a huge help <3
AESthetix256
3 posts
Joined December 2015
AESthetix256

Asherz007 wrote:

Yo. M4M(s) from #modreqs :)

Ah... LNs, my worst enemy. :P

If there is anything in here that you don't agree with, feel free to reject it, but please explain why you have done so, so that other mappers can understand your intentions.

General
Nothing much to say here, to be honest. Just don't forget about hitsounding. (It's not enough to just change the volume every now and again.) :)

That being said, with current ranking requirements, every map needs a difficulty under 2*. Consider making one or finding someone for a GD.

0|1|2|3

Andi's NM
Overall, it's nicely mapped, though there are some changes I would like to suggest. (It looks long, but that's because I write a lot.)

A general point would be before I go on would be that there are some areas where I feel that it's not clear as to what the notes are trying to follow. Within a pattern, try to maintain following one thing, like the vocals or the piano, but try not to switch mid-phrase, as it can be a little jarring to newer players. I'm not going to mention every tiny detail, but have a look again at the map with this thought in mind.

  1. 00:10:397 (10397|0,10472|1,10547|2,10622|3) - To me, this feels a little bit like an overmap here. For a relatively calm section of the song, I don't think it needs a 1/4 ministream. A possible alternative would just be to remove this and extend the LN by 1 beat.Removed and extended
  2. 00:10:997 - I feel like you should map something here since you want to follow the vocals in the small section afterwards.Done
  3. 00:13:397 (13397|0) - Ghost note (every note in mania should be mapped to something. This one isn't). Remove it.Done as well
  4. 00:13:697 (13697|3,13847|1) - ^ (You could probably get away with the second one, considering the pitch change in the vocals)^
  5. 00:14:447 (14447|2) - ^^
  6. 00:15:497 (15497|2,15497|0,15947|3,15947|1,16697|3,16697|0,17147|1,17147|2) - Consider making one of these LNs in each pair a normal note, since there is only one long sound with one short one in the audio every time.Ahhh, I realized just now that LN means Long Note :lol: (Corrected as well)
  7. 00:20:297 (20297|3) - Make a double instead of a single (LN ends don't really count as a note)Noted and done
  8. 00:27:497 (27497|0) - Double for consistency?Yup
  9. 00:30:947 (30947|2) - Ghost noteRemoved
  10. 00:38:447 (38447|0,39197|0) - I wouldn't do this (LN shielding) at this difficulty. Newer players may find something like this a little difficult to play, so consider moving the note after the LN into a different column.Cya shielding
  11. 00:39:497 (39497|3,39797|2,40097|1,40247|0) - This is semi-unclear as to what you want to follow here. I assume you're trying to follow the vocals, so I reckon you'd need another note at 00:40:547.Added
  12. 00:43:097 (43097|1,43097|0,43247|3,43697|0,43847|1,43997|2,44147|3,44147|1,44297|2,44297|0) - This feels a little mis-mapped in my opinion. I'm not entirely sure what you want to follow here. Also play-wise it makes sense, the readability isn't as great as it could be, consider remapping this small section.Remapped
  13. 00:54:347 (54347|2) - Move to col 1?Moved to col 1
  14. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (where which column a note falls in corresponds to the pitch of the thing you're trying to follow) For example, you could do something like this at 00:51:497. By no means is this obligatory, but I thought it might be nice. :)Tried to
  15. 01:03:197 (63197|2) - Move to col 3 to avoid LN shield?Next shield out the door
  16. 01:06:947 (66947|1,66947|2,66947|3) - A triple is a little too much here imo. Consider reducing to a double.Done
  17. 01:09:947 (69947|3,69947|2,70097|1,70247|0,70247|2,70397|1,70547|0,70547|2,70697|3,70697|1) - In respect to the music, this doesn't really follow it correctly. Something simpler would do the trick here.I guess I should stop commenting "Done"
    everywhere
  18. 01:12:197 (72197|0,72197|1,72197|2) - Reduce to double?^
  19. 01:19:547 (79547|1,79547|0,79697|2,79847|3,79847|1,79997|2,80147|0,80147|3,80297|1,80297|2) - I don't think this follows the musical emphasis properly either.Changed
  20. 01:28:997 (88997|0,89147|1,89147|3,89297|2,89447|3,89447|1,89597|0,89747|2,89747|1,89897|0,89897|3) - ^ (I'll stop mentioning these but there are a couple more.)[color=#008000^[/color]
  21. 01:36:497 (96497|1,96647|1,96797|1) - Definitely not a good idea to do this. I'd remove one of the LNs surronding these three notes and then put each on in a different column.Removed
  22. 01:35:897 (95897|2,96947|2) - LN shield (move note to a different column?)Fixed
  23. 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2) - 2 LNs (making the triple) is a little too much. Consider removing one of these.
This ended up being quite wordy and long, but I hope you'll find it useful.Thanks, done

HD
You may want to change this difficulty to OD 7.5, HP 7.5.
  1. 00:10:097 - Have an LN start in col 3 and remove 01:45:497 (105497|3,105497|2)?
  2. 00:13:247 (13247|2,13397|1,13697|2,13847|1,14147|3) - Ghost notes (see EZ diff for explanation if needed)
  3. 00:14:597 (14597|2) - Should this be at 00:14:447, where the vocal note starts?
  4. 00:15:347 (15347|1) - Move to col 2?
  5. 00:18:947 (18947|2,18947|1,18947|0) - I think you should remove one of these LNs. It's not wrong, but 00:20:297 needs more emphasis than just a single.
  6. 00:29:897 (29897|0,31397|3,34997|0,36197|3) - (and many more) I'm not understanding what you're mapping these LNs to. There's no sound that lasts the entire duration of this, so consider restructuring these sections.
  7. 00:30:797 (30797|2,30947|3) - Ghost notes
  8. 00:35:597 (35597|3,35747|2) - ^
  9. 00:39:047 (39047|2,39047|3,39197|0,39197|1,39347|3,39347|2) - Doubles feel a little too much here.
  10. 00:39:647 (39647|2,40397|2) - Ghost notes
  11. You miss the vocal change at 00:48:197. Perhaps another LN here? (and release one of the others)
  12. From 00:49:097 to 00:58:697, you could try for pitch relevancy (see EZ diff for more info)
  13. 00:49:547 (49547|3) - End at 00:49:697?
  14. 00:50:747 (50747|1) - End at 00:50:897?
  15. 00:51:047 (51047|2) - Make 1/2-beat LN?
  16. 00:53:147 (53147|0) - End at 00:53:297?
  17. 00:56:297 (56297|3) - This is mapped to mostly silence.
  18. 00:59:897 (59897|0,59897|1) - 1/4 LNs don't fit here. Probably better to be normal notes. (And many more that I won't mention.)
  19. 01:07:097 - Don't leave this bit blank. Unless it's impossible not to, mania maps should not have breaktimes in.
  20. 01:10:697 (70697|1) - Double for pattern
  21. LN at 01:12:197 to represent held piano sound?
  22. 01:17:297 (77297|1,77447|2,77597|3,77747|0) - Why these LNs? Continue to map the stream. Or make the entire measure like these LNs.
  23. 01:23:297 (83297|1,83297|3) - Too much emphasis here. I think this should be a single and the double should be at 01:23:147, 1/2 beat earlier.
  24. 01:24:197 (84197|3,84272|2,84347|1,84422|0,84497|1,84572|2,84647|3,84797|2,84947|1) - Either maps as 1/4 stream or 1/2 stream, not both.
  25. 01:32:072 (92072|2,92222|0) - Ghost notes
  26. 01:39:947 (99947|3,100097|2,100097|1) - Double on first hl, single on second (emphasis) (Many more like this as well.)
  27. 01:53:897 (113897|2,113897|3,113897|0,113897|1,114347|3,114347|2,114347|0,114347|1,114797|1,114797|0,114797|3,114797|2) - Quads here is too much here; you can't accurately represent the note change in the piano. Consider reducing to triples.

MX
Alright, I'm not going to do a full mod on this difficulty, as it is too similar to HD for my liking (see HD for more or less the same issues), with the star rating buffed by two overly difficult sections. I still think that this map can support something of this difficulty, but the other parts would just need to be a little harder.

There are a few issues that are unique to this diff, so I'll try to list them here. (There's a general misemphasis throughout, and it would be too long to point them all out.)
  1. 00:01:097 (1097|0,3497|3,5897|0) - (and so on) LNs mapped to silence again.
  2. 00:38:372 (38372|1,38447|0,38522|3) - You start the 1/4 stream one beat too early in my opinion.
  3. 00:43:997 (43997|3,43997|2,44147|0,44147|1,44297|3,44297|1,44297|2) - Double-double-triple feels a little too much. How about single-single-double instead?
  4. 00:49:097 (49097|0,51497|3) - More silent LNs here.
  5. 01:45:497 (105497|2,105497|3,105647|2,105647|1,105797|0,105797|2,105947|1,105947|3,106097|3,106097|0,106247|1,106247|2) - Map the 1/4 stream instead here?

If there's anything you don't understand, feel free to PM me in-game or in the forums.

Hope this helped and best of luck! :)
Holy hell you put a lot of effort into that. Thanks a lot + I learned a bunch of new terms, since I am quite new to mapping. Happy easter btw!
Umo-
1,443 posts
Joined April 2016
Umo-
Hi! M4M Request from: p/5949275#p5949275

EZ
Uncheck widescreen support since you dont have a storyboard
Make OD needs to be at least 7
00:11:447 - Ghost note?
00:13:097 - Try placing double note here
00:14:297 - Place a note here in column 3
00:14:447 - remove
00:20:747 - Place a note here
00:20:897 - remove that note, there is no sound there
00:24:497 - Remove that note and replace it with one LN
00:30:797 - There is no sound
00:31:397 - place a note here
00:35:597 - remove
00:36:347 - place a note here
00:41:147 ^
00:44:297 - ^
01:06:947 - Sound start here

Andi's NM
Uncheck widescreen support
00:10:397 - remove those stairs and replace them with LN
00:13:247 - Ghost note
00:13:397 - ^
00:14:447 - replace those 3 notes with 1 LN
00:15:347 - remove
00:17:747 - ^
00:30:797 - ^
00:30:947 - ^
00:35:597 - ^
00:35:747 - ^
00:57:647 - this current pattern is too hard for NM difficulty. Make it something like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846537

HD
Uncheck widescreen support
00:08:747 - make it look like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846613
00:13:847 - remove there is no sound there
00:21:197 - remove
00:21:347 - ^
00:26:147 - ^
Didn't have any more time! Good Luck!! :)
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler

imtdb1 wrote:

Hi! M4M Request from: p/5949275#p5949275

EZ
Uncheck widescreen support since you dont have a storyboard okay thanks
Make OD needs to be at least 7 aw
00:11:447 - Ghost note? nah this is completely fine
00:13:097 - Try placing double note here great idea
00:14:297 - Place a note here in column 3 nah this part follows the sounds of her voice and therefore this would be a ghostnote
00:14:447 - remove like I said this part follows her voice
00:20:747 - Place a note here yep
00:20:897 - remove that note, there is no sound there you're right
00:24:497 - Remove that note and replace it with one LN hm okay
00:30:797 - There is no sound not sure about this but okay
00:31:397 - place a note here sure
00:35:597 - remove same as above
00:36:347 - place a note here nice
00:41:147 ^ k
00:44:297 - ^ kinda remade this entire part but nice catch
01:06:947 - Sound start here uhm no?

Andi's NM
Uncheck widescreen support
00:10:397 - remove those stairs and replace them with LN
00:13:247 - Ghost note
00:13:397 - ^
00:14:447 - replace those 3 notes with 1 LN
00:15:347 - remove
00:17:747 - ^
00:30:797 - ^
00:30:947 - ^
00:35:597 - ^
00:35:747 - ^
00:57:647 - this current pattern is too hard for NM difficulty. Make it something like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846537

HD
Uncheck widescreen support okay thanks
00:08:747 - make it look like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846613 nah I think 2 sliders are more fitting here
00:13:847 - remove there is no sound there huh this follows her voice where she sings the "iru"
00:21:197 - remove removed
00:21:347 - ^ removed
00:26:147 - ^ removed this one and the note before it as well
Didn't have any more time! Good Luck!! :)
Thanks a lot for the mod <3
AESthetix256
3 posts
Joined December 2015
AESthetix256

imtdb1 wrote:

Hi! M4M Request from: p/5949275#p5949275

EZ
Uncheck widescreen support since you dont have a storyboard
Make OD needs to be at least 7
00:11:447 - Ghost note?
00:13:097 - Try placing double note here
00:14:297 - Place a note here in column 3
00:14:447 - remove
00:20:747 - Place a note here
00:20:897 - remove that note, there is no sound there
00:24:497 - Remove that note and replace it with one LN
00:30:797 - There is no sound
00:31:397 - place a note here
00:35:597 - remove
00:36:347 - place a note here
00:41:147 ^
00:44:297 - ^
01:06:947 - Sound start here

Andi's NM
Uncheck widescreen support
00:10:397 - remove those stairs and replace them with LN Nope. This stair won't hurt the diff
00:13:247 - Ghost note Removed
00:13:397 - ^ ^
00:14:447 - replace those 3 notes with 1 LN Done
00:15:347 - remove Done
00:17:747 - ^ This will stay
00:30:797 - ^ Removed
00:30:947 - ^ Removed
00:35:597 - ^ ...
00:35:747 - ^ ...
00:57:647 - this current pattern is too hard for NM difficulty. Make it something like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846537You're right. Removed as well

HD
Uncheck widescreen support
00:08:747 - make it look like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846613
00:13:847 - remove there is no sound there
00:21:197 - remove
00:21:347 - ^
00:26:147 - ^
Didn't have any more time! Good Luck!! :)
Nice! Thanks for the mod!
Crumpey
563 posts
Joined October 2013
Crumpey
As Requested in Crumpey's mod Queue

MX
cols = 1|2|3|4

MX(Mod)

00:07:997 (7997|2,9047|1,9347|2) - vocal mapping, seems bad also because of this you missed a beat here 00:09:497 - remove the vocal lines, they feel bad
00:09:947 - 00:11:147 - 00:14:297 - 00:12:347 - 00:14:747 - 00:16:097 - I recommend relistening in .25 or .50 speed, these fel like primary beats your missing (Im not listing them all here because they are apparent everywhere in the song and ill be here all day locating all of them
00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|1) - delete these 2, they are mapped to vocals
00:20:447 (20447|2,20897|2,21197|1,21347|3,21647|1,23297|3,24797|2,25697|3,28097|2,28847|1,29447|0,30797|1,32897|3,34397|2,34547|1) - Again not displaying them all because theres alot, ghost notes are very apparent here. i understand your looking to make a harder difficulty but ghost notes arnt the way to go imo
00:43:997 (43997|3,43997|2,44147|0,44147|1,44297|3,44297|1,44297|2) - feels reaaaaaally excessive, all doubles? single single double? having a triple in there seems bad
00:57:497 (57497|0,57647|0,57797|0,57947|0,58097|0,58247|0) - i dont agree with the jack, but if you choose to keep the jack, move the ln's to cols 2 and 3
01:26:897 (86897|3,86897|2,86972|1,86972|0,87047|3,87047|2,87122|0,87122|1,87197|2,87197|3,87272|1,87272|0) - imo id keep with the pattern before hand instead of jumptrills
01:36:497 (96497|1,96497|0,96572|3,96572|2,96647|1,96647|0,96722|3,96722|2,96797|0,96797|1,96872|2,96872|3,96947|0,96947|1,97022|3,97022|2,97097|0,97097|1) - same here
:

Pretty solid imo, just some easily made problems overall song felt pretty nice to play

sightread
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler

CrumpetFiddler wrote:

As Requested in Crumpey's mod Queue

MX
cols = 1|2|3|4

MX(Mod)

00:07:997 (7997|2,9047|1,9347|2) - vocal mapping, seems bad also because of this you missed a beat here 00:09:497 - remove the vocal lines, they feel bad
00:09:947 - 00:11:147 - 00:14:297 - 00:12:347 - 00:14:747 - 00:16:097 - I recommend relistening in .25 or .50 speed, these fel like primary beats your missing (Im not listing them all here because they are apparent everywhere in the song and ill be here all day locating all of them
00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|1) - delete these 2, they are mapped to vocals I literally have no idea why mapping the vocals is supposed to be bad or anything. I mean sure there are other things in the music here like you said in your suggestion above but I can't just map them all and even if I changed this part and mapped something else instead of the vocals it would surely feel like something is missing since the vocals are by far the loudest and also most apparent parts of the music here (this is an answer for this one and all of the above ones)
00:20:447 (20447|2,20897|2,21197|1,21347|3,21647|1,23297|3,24797|2,25697|3,28097|2,28847|1,29447|0,30797|1,32897|3,34397|2,34547|1) - Again not displaying them all because theres alot, ghost notes are very apparent here. i understand your looking to make a harder difficulty but ghost notes arnt the way to go imo I still don't think these are too bad because the map kind of builds it's own rhythm here. Also if I just deleted them this part would be boring as hell.
00:43:997 (43997|3,43997|2,44147|0,44147|1,44297|3,44297|1,44297|2) - feels reaaaaaally excessive, all doubles? single single double? having a triple in there seems bad alright since you're not the first person to complain about this ill change it into 3 doubles
00:57:497 (57497|0,57647|0,57797|0,57947|0,58097|0,58247|0) - i dont agree with the jack, but if you choose to keep the jack, move the ln's to cols 2 and 3 seems good
01:26:897 (86897|3,86897|2,86972|1,86972|0,87047|3,87047|2,87122|0,87122|1,87197|2,87197|3,87272|1,87272|0) - imo id keep with the pattern before hand instead of jumptrills nah these add some difficulty to the map and I think they're quite fitting as the part sounds like a build-up
01:36:497 (96497|1,96497|0,96572|3,96572|2,96647|1,96647|0,96722|3,96722|2,96797|0,96797|1,96872|2,96872|3,96947|0,96947|1,97022|3,97022|2,97097|0,97097|1) - same here^
:

Pretty solid imo, just some easily made problems overall song felt pretty nice to play thanks!

sightread
noice
alright sorry for denying so many of your suggestions. Your mod was still helpful so thanks <3
Alberiansyah
162 posts
Joined July 2016
Alberiansyah

Alberiansyah wrote:

EZ
  1. At here 00:05:147 (5147|3,5147|1) - LN must be follow the sound i make it like this
  2. but.. if you won't you can ingnored it
  3. 00:09:947 (9947|2,10097|0,10697|3) - Same ^
  4. 00:10:697 - add 1 note
  5. 00:10:997 (10997|2) - delete and double note at here 00:11:147 -
  6. 00:11:897 - Double
  7. 00:14:447 (14447|1) - delete and double at here 00:14:297 -
  8. 00:16:697 - add 1 note at 1
  9. 00:17:147 (17147|2) - delete and add at here
  10. 00:20:297 - add 1 note at 4
  11. 00:21:047 - add 1
  12. 00:23:297 (23297|2) - delete and move to here 00:23:147 -
  13. 00:25:697 (25697|2) - same ^ move to 00:25:547 -
  14. 00:28:097 - same ^ move to 00:27:947 -
  15. 00:57:347 (57347|2) - Delete its hard for EZ diff
Look at Ai-mods press CTRL+shift+a i think this diff is too hard for EZ Diff .
So much note did not same like a sound.
You can hear a sound by change the speed to 50% or 25% in playback rate

NM
  1. 00:10:697 - Double ?
  2. 00:11:913 - ^
  3. 00:13:097 - ^
  4. 00:14:297 - Fill double here
  5. 00:21:497 (21497|3,21497|0,21647|1,21797|3,21947|0,22097|2) - CTRL+G
  6. 00:28:697 (28697|1,28697|3,28847|2,28997|1,29147|2,29147|0,29297|3) - CTRL+H
  7. 01:26:297 (86297|3,86447|2,86597|3,86747|2,86897|3,87047|2,87197|0,87347|2,87497|3) - I think its was so hard for NM diff
    make it good like a NM diff


HD
  1. At here 00:05:147 - till 00:05:897 - make like it
  2. 00:11:897 - Double?
  3. 00:14:297 - ^ and delete 00:14:447 (14447|3) -
  4. 00:33:497 (33497|3,33647|2,33797|1,33947|0,34097|1) - CTRL+H then CTRL+G
  5. 01:36:497 (96497|2) - Delete

MX
I see you make this diff on Hard diff but you din't clear all note, its a true?

  1. 00:11:897 - Double?
  2. 00:14:297 - add 1 note
  3. 00:16:697 - ^
  4. 00:29:147 - Double?
  5. 00:41:297 (41297|0,41334|1,41372|2,41409|3,41447|0) - CTRL + H
  6. 01:12:197 - Double?
I think this map is need to be "Mod" more, But good luck with your beatmap
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler

Alberiansyah wrote:

Alberiansyah wrote:

EZ
  1. At here 00:05:147 (5147|3,5147|1) - LN must be follow the sound i make it like this nice catch
  2. but.. if you won't you can ingnored it
  3. 00:09:947 (9947|2,10097|0,10697|3) - Same ^ yep
  4. 00:10:697 - add 1 note nope because this follows the rhythm of her voice
  5. 00:10:997 (10997|2) - delete and double note at here 00:11:147 - ^
  6. 00:11:897 - Double oke
  7. 00:14:447 (14447|1) - delete and double at here 00:14:297 - same explanation as above
  8. 00:16:697 - add 1 note at 1 fine
  9. 00:17:147 (17147|2) - delete and add at here what
  10. 00:20:297 - add 1 note at 4 ok
  11. 00:21:047 - add 1 fixed
  12. 00:23:297 (23297|2) - delete and move to here 00:23:147 - ^
  13. 00:25:697 (25697|2) - same ^ move to 00:25:547 - ^
  14. 00:28:097 - same ^ move to 00:27:947 - ^
  15. 00:57:347 (57347|2) - Delete its hard for EZ diff I think this is fine
Look at Ai-mods press CTRL+shift+a i think this diff is too hard for EZ Diff . it may not be your average ez diff but I think it's acceptable and I think you just need a diff below 2 stars to be able to rank a mapset so
So much note did not same like a sound.
You can hear a sound by change the speed to 50% or 25% in playback rate

NM
  1. 00:10:697 - Double ?
  2. 00:11:913 - ^
  3. 00:13:097 - ^
  4. 00:14:297 - Fill double here
  5. 00:21:497 (21497|3,21497|0,21647|1,21797|3,21947|0,22097|2) - CTRL+G
  6. 00:28:697 (28697|1,28697|3,28847|2,28997|1,29147|2,29147|0,29297|3) - CTRL+H
  7. 01:26:297 (86297|3,86447|2,86597|3,86747|2,86897|3,87047|2,87197|0,87347|2,87497|3) - I think its was so hard for NM diff
    make it good like a NM diff


HD
  1. At here 00:05:147 - till 00:05:897 - make like it changed the sliders but I didnt include the single note
  2. 00:11:897 - Double? yes
  3. 00:14:297 - ^ and delete 00:14:447 (14447|3) - nope because this follows the rhythm of her voice
  4. 00:33:497 (33497|3,33647|2,33797|1,33947|0,34097|1) - CTRL+H then CTRL+G sure
  5. 01:36:497 (96497|2) - Delete I think this is fine

MX
I see you make this diff on Hard diff but you din't clear all note, its a true? this was the first diff I made and I know the HD diff is very similar to it

  1. 00:11:897 - Double? oke
  2. 00:14:297 - add 1 note nah this part follows the rhythm of her voice therefore this wouldnt be fitting
  3. 00:16:697 - ^ huh there's already a note over here
  4. 00:29:147 - Double? oke
  5. 00:41:297 (41297|0,41334|1,41372|2,41409|3,41447|0) - CTRL + H nice
  6. 01:12:197 - Double? sure
I think this map is need to be "Mod" more, But good luck with your beatmap
Thank you! <3
AESthetix256
3 posts
Joined December 2015
AESthetix256

Alberiansyah wrote:

Alberiansyah wrote:

EZ
  1. At here 00:05:147 (5147|3,5147|1) - LN must be follow the sound i make it like this
  2. but.. if you won't you can ingnored it
  3. 00:09:947 (9947|2,10097|0,10697|3) - Same ^
  4. 00:10:697 - add 1 note
  5. 00:10:997 (10997|2) - delete and double note at here 00:11:147 -
  6. 00:11:897 - Double
  7. 00:14:447 (14447|1) - delete and double at here 00:14:297 -
  8. 00:16:697 - add 1 note at 1
  9. 00:17:147 (17147|2) - delete and add at here
  10. 00:20:297 - add 1 note at 4
  11. 00:21:047 - add 1
  12. 00:23:297 (23297|2) - delete and move to here 00:23:147 -
  13. 00:25:697 (25697|2) - same ^ move to 00:25:547 -
  14. 00:28:097 - same ^ move to 00:27:947 -
  15. 00:57:347 (57347|2) - Delete its hard for EZ diff
Look at Ai-mods press CTRL+shift+a i think this diff is too hard for EZ Diff .
So much note did not same like a sound.
You can hear a sound by change the speed to 50% or 25% in playback rate

NM
  1. 00:10:697 - Double ? rather not
  2. 00:11:913 - ^ added
  3. 00:13:097 - ^ added
  4. 00:14:297 - Fill double here added once again
  5. 00:21:497 (21497|3,21497|0,21647|1,21797|3,21947|0,22097|2) - CTRL+G changed
  6. 00:28:697 (28697|1,28697|3,28847|2,28997|1,29147|2,29147|0,29297|3) - CTRL+H changed. has better flow now
  7. 01:26:297 (86297|3,86447|2,86597|3,86747|2,86897|3,87047|2,87197|0,87347|2,87497|3) - I think its was so hard for NM diff
    make it good like a NM diff Jup. Removed every 2nd note and changed the laned.


HD
  1. At here 00:05:147 - till 00:05:897 - make like it
  2. 00:11:897 - Double?
  3. 00:14:297 - ^ and delete 00:14:447 (14447|3) -
  4. 00:33:497 (33497|3,33647|2,33797|1,33947|0,34097|1) - CTRL+H then CTRL+G
  5. 01:36:497 (96497|2) - Delete

MX
I see you make this diff on Hard diff but you din't clear all note, its a true?

  1. 00:11:897 - Double?
  2. 00:14:297 - add 1 note
  3. 00:16:697 - ^
  4. 00:29:147 - Double?
  5. 00:41:297 (41297|0,41334|1,41372|2,41409|3,41447|0) - CTRL + H
  6. 01:12:197 - Double?
I think this map is need to be "Mod" more, But good luck with your beatmap
Thanks for the mod!
genkicho
449 posts
Joined May 2013
genkicho
NM From My Que


*I didnt testplay

Columns 1 2 3 4
MX
00:07:997 (7997|2,8297|1,8747|2,9047|1,9347|2) - looks weird, i suggest 00:07:997 (7997|2,8447|1) - move to 1 2
00:10:097 (10097|1) - i suggest end it at 00:10:397
00:13:547 (13547|3) - ends it at 00:13:847 then 00:14:147 (14147|1) - move to 4
00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|1,15497|1) - looks weird, i suggest 00:14:897 (14897|2) - delete, then 00:14:897 (14897|3) - ends it at 00:15:197 then 00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|2) - move to 3 4
00:18:947 (18947|2) - delete (?) then add 1 more note 00:20:297
00:28:697 - the hitsound here rlly annoying
00:34:247 (34247|1,34397|2,34547|1,34697|2,34847|1,34997|2,35147|1,35297|2,35447|1) - this makes col 1 empty
00:38:297 how bout dis
00:51:047 (51047|1,51197|1) - different sound i suggest different column
00:55:697 how bout dis
00:56:897 (56897|0) - double it (?)
00:57:347 how bout dis, you can extend the LN to blue line
01:05:897 (65897|2,65897|0,66347|3,66347|1) - extend them
01:09:947 (69947|1,70097|0,70247|2,70397|1,70547|0) - make them double like here 01:29:147
01:16:697 i think this part is wrong.. recheck it (?)
01:17:897 from this part until end i suggest keep using double note for piano, dont change the style. imo from this part it is not fun anymore
01:24:272 (84272|1) - no beat
01:26:297 recheck part (?) seems wrong
01:26:897 (86897|3,86897|2,86972|1,86972|0) - why this pattern in a song like this, imo it is not fun at all, but mapper's choice so up to you
01:51:497 (111497|0,111497|1) - why suddenly use triple for piano

goodluck :>
Moku_Hazushi
76 posts
Joined August 2015
Moku_Hazushi
(From my modding queue~)

Sorry i was supposed to mod your map way earlier but many things happened. Anyway nice relaxing song and the mapping is going well with it, i enjoyed modding this map.

As always, apply my mod only if you are 120% agree with me, best of luck to get it ranked >w<)b

Legend is 0|1|2|3

EZ


00:05:897 (5897|1,6347|0,7097|1,7547|3,8297|2,8747|1) - I think it was interesting to have those jack on the beginning, why not keeping the same pattern here ?

00:16:697 (16697|1) - I think it should be a clap instead of a finish, since you're mapping the same musical event as 00:15:497 (15497|3)

00:20:297 (20297|0) - Finish here instead of clap

00:36:347 (36347|2) - Not sure a clap is relevant here

00:43:097 (43097|1) - Not sure this is a good place for a finish

00:55:847 (55847|2) - What about at (1) ? I think its a good place for a jack

01:05:897 (65897|2) - I think this LN should last just a bit longer, until 01:06:122
01:06:347 (66347|1) - Same, should last 1/4 tick more

01:11:597 (71597|2) - Either you add a clap here, or you should remove one for each chords preceding
01:13:097 (73097|1,73547|2,73997|1) - This time you are using only 1 clap / chords so its probably better to keep with 1 clap / chords before too

01:15:947 - I think its important to have a note here for the piano

01:20:297 (80297|2) - I think it should be a clap here

01:21:497 (81497|2) - And probably a clap here too

01:37:697 (97697|1,97847|2,97997|1,98147|2) - I dont think you should use a trill for this voice mapping. At 01:37:847 the voice is going very high and i think you should emphasize that with a king-of stair mapping (a bit like 01:18:497 (78497|0,78647|1,78797|2,78947|1))

Really nice difficulty, the kiai time contrast with the rest of the mapping, simple HS going well with the song, good job owo)b

Andin's NM


00:03:497 (3497|2,4697|2) - I think its a bit too bad to have those 2 LN on the same column, what about moving all 00:03:497 (3497|2,3947|3) on column to the left ?

00:16:697 (16697|3) - Not sure you should use a finish here, maybe switch it for a clap, you have 2 successive finish after that

00:21:047 (21047|3,23447|2,25847|2,28247|3) - What about addind a whistle to all of those ?

00:27:947 (27947|3,28247|3) - Its a bit weird, you didnt use those kind of jack before (at 00:20:747 (20747|1,21047|3) + 00:23:147 (23147|3,23447|2,23447|0) + etc) and in fact i think the jack is a good idea. But you should keep a certain consistency so either you move 00:28:247 (28247|3) or you try to make a jack on the same previous moment

00:46:097 (46097|0) - I understand you are mapping the "bass noisy sound" here like you did before. But this time its a bit disturbing since there is also a vocal event at 00:45:947 so maybe you should try to add a note here too. Otherwise its a bit confusing and 00:46:097 (46097|0) since to map something 1/2 beat too late.

00:54:347 (54347|2) - I dont think you should use a jack here, nothing in the music really justify it

00:57:647 (57647|2,57797|1,57947|2,58097|1,58247|2,58397|1) - Maybe you can use whistles during this trill

01:00:947 - What about addind a note here ? To match a bit more with the vocal

01:20:747 (80747|0,81047|0,81347|0,81647|0) - Careful you have an anchor here, maybe simply move 01:20:747 (80747|0) to (1)

01:38:747 (98747|0,99047|0,99347|0,99647|0) - Another anchor, maybe move 01:39:047 (99047|0) to (3) to match the high piano note

Really enjoyable diff too, i like how you managed to balance vocal mapping with drum/other musical event mapping. No major issue,
and the kiai contrast well with the rest, nice diff :3

HD


00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|1) - I dont think you should go for a jack here

00:16:697 (16697|3) - Same remark as the other diff, i dont think you should use a finish here since you have 2 successive finish after, switch it for a clap

00:22:097 (22097|2) - Maybe move it to (1), you are over-using the (2) column here and i dont see any musical reason for that
(plus it creates a certain symmetry with 00:22:247 (22247|3,22397|2,22547|1,22697|3,22697|2) and 00:22:847 (22847|0,22997|1,23147|3,23147|2) )

00:38:447 (38447|1) - I think you should make this LN last until 00:38:747

From 01:13:247 (73247|2) to 01:13:247 (73247|2) - I suggest you use this mapping for this part. Its the same idea you used during the kiai but without chords. This way you keep a certain consistency without spoiling the kiai :



From 01:26:297 to 01:27:497 - Why only half the stair has whistle HS ? Either use whistle during the whole stair or no whistle at all but not just the hafl

From 01:29:147 to 01:29:897 - The jack should be on the 2 first chords pair. I mean
01:29:147 (89147|2,89147|3,89297|0,89297|1) - Those should be a chord jack
01:29:747 (89747|1,89747|0,89897|0,89897|1) - Those shouldnt

No real mistakes with the mapping here, and many nice ideas like the full LNs mapping at 00:49:097 or the jacks during the kiai at 01:19:547 etc. So yeah i enjoyed test-playing this diff too ^-^

MX


00:15:197 (15197|1,15347|1) - Same remark as the HD, i dont think you should use a jack here, what do you think of this instead :



00:16:697 (16697|3) - Same as the previous diff xD Maybe no finish but a clap instead

00:22:397 (22397|2) - I think you should move it to (1) first to mark the separation between the 2 musical phrases and then to avoid overusing the (2) column

00:23:147 - Missing clap ?

00:27:347 (27347|2) - Would move it to (3), also to avoid overusing the (2) column

00:29:147 - Maybe a clap here too

From 00:28:697 to 00:29:897 - During this part the drum stops using snares and its also a transition point between the 2 jump stream. Thats why id suggest using a mapping a bit different here. For example you can either go for only chords on white ticks or if you want to keep the 1/4 flow you can go for a jack after each chords, or something else

00:34:247 (34247|1) - Would move it to (0) to avoid overusing the (1) column

At 00:57:497 - The jacks are a really good idea but you should change the start like this :
00:57:497 (57497|0) - Remove this one
00:57:347 (57347|2) - Move it to (0) and make it an LN until 00:57:497 this way it matches exactly the synthesizer

At 01:09:947 - I think you should use a simplified version of the jacks you are using during the kiai to map this musical event

01:29:147 (89147|1,89297|1,89447|1) - This triple jack is not good, i would suggest remapping this part as the following (you can also find anything else you like better that avoid any triple jacks) :



01:39:497 (99497|2) - Maybe move it to (3) to avoid the triple jack

Just some mapping mistakes sometime i think, but good diff overall with a difficulty climax at the kiai which is nice. Wide range of patterns and still enjoyable to play. So nice work owo)b
Rammler
38 posts
Joined March 2014
Topic Starter
Rammler
gonna go through these sometime in the near future
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 15