1. 00:02:047 (5,6,6) - on the first combo you put the double clickables on notes that actually also sound the same pitch wise while on the second instance you put them a beat earlier. they are spaced out and so convey a change, fair enough, but why is the slider after it not a stack too is what i wonder.
2. then there's 00:04:600 (1,2) - on the same topic which is also the same pitch but does move, it's unclear to me how you use the two singles instead of a slider.
3. 00:02:685 (1,2) - 00:06:515 (1,2) - just a bit sad you didn't use the tripple here by just placing another note on top of the second slider. the sounds are quite a significant element of the melody after alll. i assume it's to make the opening less dense?
4. 00:04:919 (3) - it covers up the accordeon sounds (if that's the instrument used)in favour of enlonging the downbeat sound. so far so good, but why did you only use that here, at the last instance of a repetition which never used any of these before, just a means of variation?
5. 00:03:483 (4,5) - 00:01:409 (3,4) - 00:05:398 (4) - can't tell if you're emphasising the percussion double or not as it's layed out completely different every time. only the second part lays pretty strong emphasis on it while the rest kind of covers it over. might want to either remove that extra emphasis on the second instance or add some on the other two. except if you have other intentions behind the spacing in the second instance and the reverse slider
6. 00:35:079 (6,7) - i'd suggest putting the slider after the circle in the timeline. currently the red as well as the white tick of the slider cover sounds as while the singletap, an active rhythm, does not. so rather than having a click on nothing, a slider end as filler, as you've used it often already in the map, seems more appropriate. just like you did it here 00:42:738 (5,6) -
7. in this instance it's fine though 00:38:909 (4,1) - as all three ticks have sounds, it's different. however it's a bit strange to have the strongest of the three sounds on the slider end.
8. 00:45:611 (2) - seems odd to cover over the main focus of the map so far, the vocals, with a long slider in favour of a long sound that has been present all along but hasn't been mapped like it. it's a transitioning beat, so a change up in focus is viable, but to still capture the vocal along the held sound, a 1/2 reverse slider might be a good option. basically what you did with the slider after it anyway, just in 1/1.
9. 01:14:058 (6) - this par of notes is different from the previous two on pretty much any instrument to follow, so i'd give it a special something in the mapping too. be it simply an opposite direction or making it into two notes in a similar fashion to how you covered with 01:11:933 (6) - 01:17:558 (1,2,3,4) - . i at least would prefere playing the change over just having another unified slider cover it.
10. 01:24:308 (10) - this par of vocal sliders blends in a bit much with the previous sliders that convey something completely different unlike places like 01:14:308 (7) - where it distinctly differs. nitpicky though
11. 01:25:558 (1,2) - these two sliders look exactly the same even though the rhythms they cover are completely different. there are various ways to fix that. enlonging the second slider and making 3 into just a note on the blue tick, making 1 into singles since you don't focus on vocals in this particular beat anyway due to 01:24:933 (4) - , making a reverse etc
12. 01:40:308 (8,2) - due to usingthe intensifying vocals as singletaps here 01:36:308 (1,2) - i'd do the same thing here. it whouldn't really conflict with the drum 1/4 after it since 01:40:683 (2) - seems out of place anyway and i'd suggest putting a slider on 1 instead. with that you'd cover the low drum better while still catching everything else.
13. 02:06:204 (7) - i can't say i understand why this is a tripple. i don't hear anything on the blue
14. 02:08:119 (6) - for this one, i hear a tripple between 02:08:358 (8,1) - instead. might be more intuitive to map it where there actually is one in the song
15. 02:31:975 (2,3,4) - i don't see why you use three singles here since you used a long slider every other time with even more significant beats on the middle tick. seems out of place
16. 02:39:475 (2,3) - this conveys the vocals as being three of the same kind or a different one in the middle, which isn't the case. i'd remove the revers and move it along with the single before it by one half beat. if a 3/4 gap seems uncomfortable to you there would be no problem adding another note where the current two is again. in fact a 2 note stack seems quite appealing.
17. 02:47:207 (6,7) - these two seem kind of random, they do not follow the strongly implied path of the previous note in the meassure. sounds more like http://puu.sh/vwLgy/6f89582dbf.jpg
18. 03:07:957 (6) - this one looks like an unnecessary filler no matter how i look at it. suggesting to use a regular 1/2 filler slider like usual
19. 03:11:832 (2,3) - on contrary this gap also seems unnecessary. everything you might be following with 03:11:582 (1,2,3) - this beat is continuous during that gap. im sure there are enough ways to make 3 stand out other than just undermapping the beat.
20. 03:16:082 (6,7) - there is a set of four syllables, starting on the slider end of 6, which really makes it lack the emphasis it deserves.
21. 03:18:582 (1,1,1) - i don't know about this. it gives the vocals emphasis.. but it's lacking. the sliders instead of just singles imply there's more to it since they're not just filler rhythms, but you don't map more to it. the drum parts are just ignored, if you implement those in some way too, i think this part will get more interesting to play. also the entire part after it 03:19:582 (1,2,3,4) - feels lackluster. looks like it's a continuous thing, taking away emphasis of all the interesting things happening there in the song. i can't discern if it is following anything
22. 03:29:582 (5,6) - why the double on the slider head. seems arbitrary. takes away emphasis from the vocal and puts it on..? the vocal is clearly on the white tick
23. 03:52:082 (3) - i'd make this into a single to signify the distinct stop the song takes there. it really isn't continuous as the current pattern implies
24. 03:53:332 (4) - not sure what the reverse is for. the end is now on nothing. due to 03:54:457 (6,1,2,3,4) - i assume it was for the guitar, but that's a 3/4 beat and thus isn't covered properly either.
25. 03:56:957 (2) - nice little switch up in the song that you covered over, i'd just go single plus 1/4 slider
26. 04:04:332 (7) - would make this one stand out more, remove it from the rest of the pattern like you did on other occasions
27. 04:06:707 (2) - don't hear any 1/8. even if it's for the clapping instrument thing that you ignored everywhere else, the 1/8 from that is one 1/4 later
28. 04:17:582 (5,6) - again, i don't get the point of this. could argue it's on the long background vocal here.. but then you just skipped them earlier in the messure 04:16:957 (3) -
29. 04:24:957 (2,3,4,5,6) - i get how you want low density here but.. it's ignoring so much i get thrown off instead. mostly because it's all of a sudden. i'd probably just fully map the vocals, but with the spacing you're using now. making doubles stacks for example. imo that would feel more satisfactory to play

00:35 Delis: I was finding my map and I type sotarks in search bar
00:35 Delis: ...
00:35 *Delis is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1279490 Rita - dorchadas]
00:36 Delis: I need your help on this because it's so strangeee
00:37 EvilElvis: i can say why
00:37 EvilElvis: because of saya bg
00:37 EvilElvis: ok
00:37 Delis: NOP
00:39 EvilElvis: 00:54:058 (4,5) - circles plz
00:39 EvilElvis: slider 00:55:058 (1,2) - 
00:39 EvilElvis: 00:55:558 (1,2) - 
00:39 EvilElvis: same
00:39 EvilElvis: 00:55:808 (3) - circles
00:39 EvilElvis: 00:56:308 (3) - circles
00:40 Delis: wow
00:40 Delis: deep mod
00:40 EvilElvis: 00:59:558 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these all better be sliders tbh
00:40 EvilElvis: 01:02:933 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - see same pattern i suggested
00:41 EvilElvis: 01:18:558 (1,2,3,4) - 01:20:558 (1,2) -  why these not same in terms of rhythmic??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
00:42 Delis: LOL
00:42 Delis: okok
00:43 EvilElvis: 01:40:558 (1,2) - i'd go with something like https://puu.sh/vAllK/29df65457a.jpg instead
00:46 Delis: ok dad
00:48 EvilElvis: try add whistle with drum addition on 02:46:582 (3) - its end, 02:46:832 (4) - same, 02:47:082 (5) - whistle with normal sampleset and drum addition, 02:47:207 (6) - normal sampleset with drum addition on the end of this slider, 02:47:582 (1) - drum finish,  02:47:707 (2) - drum clap and whistle on the head and 02:47:707 (2) - drum clap on the end
00:48 Delis: it's
00:48 Delis: confusing
00:48 EvilElvis: i'll give you osu file instead ok
00:48 EvilElvis: lemme just finish pointing stuff
00:48 EvilElvis: 02:48:082 (1) - see the very first bit of my mod
00:49 Delis: no no i'LL try dw
00:50 EvilElvis: 03:41:582 (1) - unrankebel
00:50 Delis: WHAAAT
00:50 Delis: STILL?
00:50 EvilElvis: i guess
00:50 EvilElvis: you better ask other people
00:50 EvilElvis: who know it better
00:50 EvilElvis: tbh
00:50 EvilElvis: 04:07:832 (1,2,3) - i'd continue with circles
00:51 Delis: I'd love to go with sliders because I will be dead with more circles
00:51 EvilElvis: lel pussy
00:51 EvilElvis: other than this
00:51 Delis: sotarks pussy
00:51 EvilElvis: there is nothing from me
00:52 EvilElvis: there were couple of spacing changes which made me think about reality