[General]
-) I'd do a more consistent increase of the Overall Difficulty, make 4 - 4.5 - 5 - 5.5 - 6 for Kantan - Futsuu - Muzukashii - Oni - Inner Oni.
-) Well, I don't think you have to put the SV in Kantan and Futsuu at 1.20x but I leave this to the BNs and QATs what they say about this choice.
[Inner Oni]
00:18:347 - If you ask me but it's a weird decision to have a "break" here - or at least you keep this empty. You may have your reasons.. so I don't interpret too much here. But it's... strange generally.
00:40:483 (228,229,230,231) - The intention (?) sounds lame to me.. it doesn't really feel like it's something where you "just" tap to kat notes. You could give the vocals some impact, what about kdd kkd?
00:47:473 (290,291,292,293,294,295,296) - kkdkddk is quite odd to listen, what about using kkddkdd instead?
[Oni]
00:39:173 (204,205,206) - The idea of dkd is pretty strange if you ask me, I'd rather choose to take something more common that follows the vocals properly, like ddk.
00:39:755 (209,210,211,212) - This makes more sense if you applied to the previous point: You could also emphasize the vocals here with a triplet, instead of k ddd, do kdd d.
00:51:406 (288) - Flow-wise, this is a really mean kick. I'd just move it to 00:51:260 - to have a more consistent beat you can hold.
01:08:299 (375,376,377) - another dkd. I don't mind that sort of triplet but it doesn't fit very much, that's why I am picking on it. The song barely has parts where dk/dkd or kd/kdk sounds justified, that's my view.
01:10:483 (390,391,392,393,394,395) - Personally, I don't like this constellation very much. I don't doubt you're following something in the song but my idea is to change that to kkddk d:
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/pE5fJFxc.png01:16:673 (435) - instead of kkk, what about having the triplet 1/2 earlier and as ddk? It felt more consistent when I was trying it, you should give it at try.
[Muzukashii]
00:12:449 - I don't think it'd be a bad decision to make this as triplet. ddd d kkk d K works really good and the triplet makes the kat usage more natural.
00:20:969 (75) - I'd definitely call this as higher note and change to k.
00:34:075 - 00:36:114 - I am :thinking: really hard about this part but I find this can be done better. Either
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/WiQf0t1c.png or
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/Ul3H4Yu0.png , first idea works very well with vocals, second works good with vocals and having a more constant rhythm.
01:09:318 (307,308,309,310,311,312) - having a more expressive rhythm here would be better, remove 01:09:755 (310) - and make 01:09:609 (309) - to k.
01:20:823 (377) - I don't find this note is contributing very well to the song and pattern, you should remove it simply.
01:45:872 (501) - the transistion is way better if you go d d k k d, 01:45:726 (500,501) - would be for that case d d. in short: make this note as d.
[Futsuu]
00:01:566 (2,7,11,16) - The follow here is really really weird, at this point I'd just suggest to remove it since it barely hurt on the difficulty itself. Unlike in the higher difficulties where the density is higher, these notes are really awkward to follow and barely fits.
00:39:027 (104,105,106,107) - It may break consistency here but I will still mention my thoughts about that: The vocal on 00:39:318 - has quite a big impact and may not be ignored, 00:39:609 (105,106,107) - could be changed to dkk to follow the vocals and guitar riff better. And uh yeah, the note at 00:39:027 - should be moved to 00:39:318 - .
00:57:668 - 00:57:959 - personally I find that kkk works better and can have a better follow on the vocals instead of the clashing sound at 00:57:813 - .
[Kantan]
2,00* Kantan :thinking:
00:13:105 - 00:20:532 - Something that makes your difficulty significantely easier is to use more single colour sections:
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/anUmw9jk.png d d are for the lower level parts and k k for the higher, I guess you know what I am trying to say.
00:22:862 (21,22) - You can get rid of from (21) and add a finisher on (22), the two beats on 00:22:425 - (where 20 is placed) and 00:23:299 - can be emphasized better with the finishers.
00:25:338 (25,26) - and 00:28:250 (31,32) - You should switch them, having a firm structure of combo pattern makes it easier to follow and the consistency avoids unexpected changes of rhythm follow.
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/Ltit4xa7.png00:34:075 - 00:39:901 -
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/FkFwBp24.png It's very similar to the previous point so I just short it with the example image.
00:41:066 - 00:45:726 - I don't think the current rhythm setting is good and feels natural to play. Since the SR is to the maximum, we sadly cannot use 1/2 at this point - at least I couldn't find a way to implement it without boosting the SR. The best thing I got was this:
https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/QPZDKB2G.pngYou can re-use this pattern for the second loop if necessary.
01:04:367 (48,49,50,51) - The rhythm here is pretty strange and doesn't feel.. right imo. I'd simplfy this part with d dkk. Repeat this for similar cases such as 01:06:697 (52,53,54,55,56) - .
01:34:658 - 01:42:085 - pretty much what I said recently about 00:13:105 - 00:20:532 - .
Good luck!