[Reverberation]
00:03:873 (1) - maybe no NC here? seems kinda pointless
yep00:20:236 (3,3) - possibly NC these, for consistency (these types of repeat sliders were their own combos)
true00:25:691 (6) - perhaps map this as a triple, leave the other repeat be
It was a triple, but I just choose to remove this one cause finger control is really hard after that triple 00:25:282 (2,3,4) - 00:27:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hmm, i think this grid needs some work. maybe tweaking the ratios a little?
This is not a grid this is a star into a triangle 00:36:055 - i really like this stream
Thanks (>v<)/ !!00:39:327 (1,2,3,4) - this is a nice idea but its a little much, maybe inch it a bit closer to the slider
Why not 00:48:055 (1) - a bit of a sharp turn. if you really cant make it look any fatter, disregard
Mhmmm, thats look pretty ok for me, maybe if more ppl want to change that i'll do, but seems ok for me00:52:964 (4,5,6,7,8) - this is a pretty big snap...
Reduced a bit01:37:827 (7) - overmapped?
Slider end is overmapped, but thats not a big problem for playing, also I put that one for emphasis the vocals and imo it's fair01:47:781 (4) - this spacing is pretty inconsistent, its kinda contradictory with the hype you were building with the previous sliders
Totally true, but I like the visuals x.x cause I placed the same pattern here 01:46:964 (1,2) - just symetrics :p01:52:282 (5) - ctrl+g for flow?
Changed the pattern !02:13:009 (5,1) - looks like 1/4th spacing imo
Added more spacing03:04:964 (2,3) - should be a pair of jumps aswell, feels undermapped
I'm not totally agreed for that, cause the song just fading out the intensity and for me its better to make sliders here instead of jumps, like this part 07:04:691 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - I putted jumps cause this is not before a break and the intensity isn't the same at all03:44:373 - undermapped a red tick here, i feel as though it can be mapped
Fixed04:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - i like
Thank you ♥04:21:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this feels like it escalates really quickly, should be more gradual, dunno
I like it, idk04:21:941 (1) - have this end on the red tick? its just uncool to have a circle that quickly at such a bpm
Why not04:49:146 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - feels kinda boring, inconsistent with the other jumps
Already nerfed and explain that choice, this is volontary a diff spike to emphasis the next part of the song, like a reward for the player who fc that jump05:10:964 (1,2) - these are both different sliders, copy paste instead
They're the sames 05:13:691 (9) - really fast, looks weird since stream was low spacing
Reduced sv05:27:055 (9) - ^
ok06:00:873 (1) - pointless NC? i can see the thought behind it though
I prefer change the color for that low sv slider06:41:327 (6) - would look better imo if you ctrl+g and ctrl+h it, but keep in the same place
Spacing will be too large 08:01:895 (8) - really difficult to read, but i guess that doesnt matter because its a slider
True but its okay I think, can't really make it better :/08:04:894 (1,2) - switch NC, remove it on the last note?
oki !