Well I am thoroughly disappointed.JesusYamato wrote:
Not doing it, denied by peppy.
Well I am thoroughly disappointed.JesusYamato wrote:
Not doing it, denied by peppy.
I doubt that because peppy mentioned a lot of times that they already have a system for checking the multiaccounts and it does work. The problem is not spotting them but how to deal with them.Shael wrote:
What about we could have a score checking team?
just quickly saw that, and i wanted to add: have you ever seen this "system" being used? not to attackt peppy, but i honestly think, this is just made up, since i haven't seen it being used, and with all these multis, it's hard for me to believe. proof of concept please.Neruell wrote:
I doubt that because peppy mentioned a lot of times that they already have a system for checking the multiaccounts and it does work. The problem is not spotting them but how to deal with them.Shael wrote:
What about we could have a score checking team?
More than once.Kotik wrote:
just quickly saw that, and i wanted to add: have you ever seen this "system" being used? not to attackt peppy, but i honestly think, this is just made up, since i haven't seen it being used, and with all these multis, it's hard for me to believe. proof of concept please.Neruell wrote:
I doubt that because peppy mentioned a lot of times that they already have a system for checking the multiaccounts and it does work. The problem is not spotting them but how to deal with them.
ban half of asia then, kotik.Kotik wrote:
why don't we just go like valve? ban everyone!
no but really. peppy should dedicate a team, he can trust, to seek the leaderboards for "multis". whenever a certain person from that team, finds someone he/she'd suspect to be a multi, he/she would send out a warning to the person, after of course, looking at their profile; if something like "joined: 27th august 2011" would show up, and the person would have a top40 on an insane, that would just help, and then a warning would need to be send out. if the person then continues to play like this, then an instant ban would be appropiate.
just putting my idea out here.
also, i'm european as you obviously see, but when i saw you basically saying "only asians multi" i dropped my food. stop being racist. ._.
chinese don't multiaccount nearly as much as japanesedkun wrote:
ban half of asia then, kotik.Kotik wrote:
why don't we just go like valve? ban everyone!
no but really. peppy should dedicate a team, he can trust, to seek the leaderboards for "multis". whenever a certain person from that team, finds someone he/she'd suspect to be a multi, he/she would send out a warning to the person, after of course, looking at their profile; if something like "joined: 27th august 2011" would show up, and the person would have a top40 on an insane, that would just help, and then a warning would need to be send out. if the person then continues to play like this, then an instant ban would be appropiate.
just putting my idea out here.
also, i'm european as you obviously see, but when i saw you basically saying "only asians multi" i dropped my food. stop being racist. ._.
the account ratio for chinese is ~3:1 and ~2:1 for the koreans.
i never said to ban any special kind of the world. just whoever looks suspicious. :3dkun wrote:
ban half of asia then, kotik.Kotik wrote:
why don't we just go like valve? ban everyone!
no but really. peppy should dedicate a team, he can trust, to seek the leaderboards for "multis". whenever a certain person from that team, finds someone he/she'd suspect to be a multi, he/she would send out a warning to the person, after of course, looking at their profile; if something like "joined: 27th august 2011" would show up, and the person would have a top40 on an insane, that would just help, and then a warning would need to be send out. if the person then continues to play like this, then an instant ban would be appropiate.
just putting my idea out here.
also, i'm european as you obviously see, but when i saw you basically saying "only asians multi" i dropped my food. stop being racist. ._.
the account ratio for chinese is ~3:1 and ~2:1 for the koreans.
dkun wrote:
the account ratio for chinese is ~3:1 and ~2:1 for the koreans.
I was just quoting Peppy's words. It is not me who is writing software for Osu!. If you don't believe that Peppy is saying truth then you assume that he is lying.Kotik wrote:
also, Neurell, i still want proof of concept, before i choose to believe you.
*peppy *osu! :3Neruell wrote:
I was just quoting Peppy's words. It is not me who is writing software for Osu!. If you don't believe that Peppy is saying truth then you assume that he is lying.Kotik wrote:
also, Neurell, i still want proof of concept, before i choose to believe you.
Also yeah I was talking about !Multi since it did show who did log in with what account and how many times.
You sure?gorlum wrote:
So they have a few top scores using multi accounts. But who cares?
Is it so important for you to be #35 in some song and to be beaten after 1 week? Multi accounts don't have some solid high scores and rarely reach #1 score anyway.
Why? Multi accounts are barely an issue at all as far as i can tellnaptime wrote:
I kind of got the impression that you had to be approved in some way to join. That would be nice.
The problem is that this insanely easy thing does not get done as often as it should in this community.Chaotic wrote:
All i'm saying is, it's insanely easy to filter the Multi accounts which need to be banned, from the ones which aren't very much of an issue..
Chaotic wrote:
remember that having Multiple accounts barely passes as a rule in the first place, there is nothing wrong with 99% of them
A small group of experienced players is all it takes to get rid of the "bad" Multi accounts. And like i said before, opinion.KRZY wrote:
The problem is that this insanely easy thing does not get done as often as it should in this community.
I completely agree with you, but this has been suggested and denied before. Sad :<Chaotic wrote:
A small group of experienced players is all it takes to get rid of the "bad" Multi accounts. And like i said before, opinion.KRZY wrote:
The problem is that this insanely easy thing does not get done as often as it should in this community.
Will this new solution be implemented fairy soon or when osz2 is released? I mean we're all fairly aware that a LOT of the new osu features are going to come during osz2 but we really have absolutely zero timeframe for when it's actually going to be here. I mean it could be in a month, it could be in 2 years.Ephemeral wrote:
this is a pertinent issue i see, but the approach from most people in this thread isn't really helping things.
a team designed to sit down and figure out who are multi accounts will never work. like dvorak said, the only way to address this problem is through technology, and we already have some pretty neat stuff in place. we know who the multis are, it's just dealing with them that is the issue.
!multi was disabled because it was unhelpful. !multi rarely (if ever) provided information that would help us detect multi-accounts. it was too easy to fool and has since been replaced with the automated system that i mentioned earlier.
i can't actually say what is going to happen, but rest assured that something is happening. that account standing thing in your profile has something to do with it.
I'm all for this.JesusYamato wrote:
What would be funny is making the multi appear in profile, even though it's not banned it'll be some kind of public shame.