1. Advanced (1,77 stars, 84 notes)
2. Easy (1,05 stars, 30 notes)
3. Habits (2,67 stars, 100 notes)
4. Hard (2,28 stars, 89 notes)
5. Normal (1,5 stars, 68 notes)

1. 00:19:822 (1) - unsnapped
2. 00:25:195 (1) - Why the red tick in this one? It seems you were making a pattern with sliders shape: 00:16:240 (1,2) = 00:21:613 (1,2) , 00:18:031 (1,2) = 00:23:404 (1,2) , but 00:19:822 (1,2) have different shapes from 00:25:195 (1,2).
3. 00:35:045 (3,2) - This overlap seems not good for me.
4. 00:35:941 (1,2) - Anyway, this seems kinda off too, you were basically using two identical sliders all the time with only different angles or direction, but this time you used totally different shaped sliders.
5. 00:46:463 (4,1,2) - That overlap kinda bothers me
6. 00:49:374 (3) - This blanket is off
7. 00:54:747 (3) - This one too
8. 00:57:434 (1) - No need for a clap.

1. 00:18:926 (3,4) - 00:22:508 (3,4) - 00:26:090 (3,4) - 00:29:672 (3,4) - 00:33:254 (3,4) - 00:36:837 (3,4) - 00:40:419 (3,4) - Seems really weird how every second slider is setted up in a different place, also the last one has a straight slider while all the others were curved...
2. 00:44:896 (1,2,3) - This patterns seems weird, probably because is a totally different pattern that you made only this time, going from the very top of screen to the bottom of the screen.
3. 00:47:583 (3,4) - The positioning seems a little random for me, probably not supposed to be a blanket right? Well it can be...
4. 00:57:434 (1) - No clap
5. Some overlaps that bothers me: 00:16:687 (2,5) - 00:23:851 (2,5) - 00:24:971 (5,3) -

miradzin wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:19:822 (1) - unsnapped it's snapped, manual stack cuz it's easier to read
2. 00:25:195 (1) - Why the red tick in this one? It seems you were making a pattern with sliders shape: 00:16:240 (1,2) = 00:21:613 (1,2) , 00:18:031 (1,2) = 00:23:404 (1,2) , but 00:19:822 (1,2) have different shapes from 00:25:195 (1,2). wanted some variety, but no problem, gonna change
3. 00:35:045 (3,2) - This overlap seems not good for me. same, lack of creativity, im dumb :c
4. 00:35:941 (1,2) - Anyway, this seems kinda off too, you were basically using two identical sliders all the time with only different angles or direction, but this time you used totally different shaped sliders. this is not a big problem since my intention wasn't make this kind of patterning, but it does make sense, fixed
5. 00:46:463 (4,1,2) - That overlap kinda bothers me i love this kind of overlapping tbh, isn't destroying any kind of aestheticz tho
6. 00:49:374 (3) - This blanket is off i map with grid snap on, making things extremely accurate is hard, but yea did my best
7. 00:54:747 (3) - This one too same
8. 00:57:434 (1) - No need for a clap. clapped your face

[Habits]

1. 00:18:926 (3,4) - 00:22:508 (3,4) - 00:26:090 (3,4) - 00:29:672 (3,4) - 00:33:254 (3,4) - 00:36:837 (3,4) - 00:40:419 (3,4) - Seems really weird how every second slider is setted up in a different place, also the last one has a straight slider while all the others were curved... yea i wasn't aiming something really aesthetical just a nice movement, plays well though, and the spacing is constant anyway. About the last one: variety and 00:20:717 (3) - g
2. 00:44:896 (1,2,3) - This patterns seems weird, probably because is a totally different pattern that you made only this time, going from the very top of screen to the bottom of the screen. that was me trying to make things on kiai less boring, it worked i guess... couldn't find a reason to change too
3. 00:47:583 (3,4) - The positioning seems a little random for me, probably not supposed to be a blanket right? Well it can be... uuuh like, i did things counter-flow on 00:45:792 (3,4) - 00:47:583 (3,4) - 00:54:747 (3,4) -. May consider a better pattern to 00:52:956 (3,4) - though, it's not consistent with the others
4. 00:57:434 (1) - No clap claps are cute :c fixd
5. Some overlaps that bothers me: 00:16:687 (2,5) - 00:23:851 (2,5) - 00:24:971 (5,3) - overlaps are life thank

Couldn't find anything wrong in the lower diffs. Set seems pretty good. :3

[Habits]

1. Lembra de mutar esses sliders 3/4 aqui; 00:17:135 (3) - /00:18:926 (3) - /00:20:717 (3) - / 00:22:508 (3) - , etc. Eu não vejo nenhum som nesses ticks azuis e provavelmente você estruturou isso pra dar ênfase no vocal, se for esse mesmo o caso, aconselho bastante mutar eles.
2. Visualmente esse é o único par dos sliders 3/4 + slider 1/2 que não seguiu o padrão de todos os anteriores 00:29:672 (3,4) - . Todos os anteriores eram basicamente um slider ondulado 00:26:090 (3) – seguido de um reto 00:26:538 (4) – . Alterar o padrão visual deles a partir deste ponto aqui 00:30:568 (1) – me parece bem razoável e aconselhável pra deixar o mapa mais dinâmico, mas antes do bookmark poderia manter todos com a mesmo design.
   Outra opção viável tendo em vista como vc fez as marcações no verso da música, é fazer o padrão ondulado+reto e ondulado+ondulado alternadamente em cada um dos bookmarks; 00:16:240 -/00:23:404 -/00:30:568 -/00:37:732 -
3. Você tá fazendo um padrão de hitsound no whistle aqui; 00:17:807 (5) -/00:21:389 (5) -/00:24:971 (5) -, etc, que não se repete nas frases consecutivas, mais especificamente, nos sliderends 00:19:374 (4) -/00:22:956 (4) -/00:26:538 (4) - , no entanto você está usando o whistle na segunda upbeat de todas as frases, 00:16:687 (2) -/00:18:478 (2) -/00:20:269 (2) -/00:22:060 (2) -, etc. Algum motivo em especial pra não usar na ultima upbeat de todas as frases? Acredito que possa ser pra dar mais ênfase no circle 5 das medidas ímpares, 00:17:807 (5) -/00:21:389 (5) -/00:24:971 (5) - , mas não deixa de quebrar a consistência do hitsound. Talvez colocar um inherented point pra diminuir o volume do hitsound no final desses sliders 00:19:374 (4) -/00:22:956 (4) -/00:26:538 (4) -, o que acha?

Trynna wrote:

miradzin wrote:

1. 00:57:434 (1) - No need for a clap. clapped your face

Net0 wrote:

#modreqs

[Habits]

1. Lembra de mutar esses sliders 3/4 aqui; 00:17:135 (3) - /00:18:926 (3) - /00:20:717 (3) - / 00:22:508 (3) - , etc. Eu não vejo nenhum som nesses ticks azuis e provavelmente você estruturou isso pra dar ênfase no vocal, se for esse mesmo o caso, aconselho bastante mutar eles. desculpa, eu sou burro
2. Visualmente esse é o único par dos sliders 3/4 + slider 1/2 que não seguiu o padrão de todos os anteriores 00:29:672 (3,4) - . Todos os anteriores eram basicamente um slider ondulado 00:26:090 (3) – seguido de um reto 00:26:538 (4) – . Alterar o padrão visual deles a partir deste ponto aqui 00:30:568 (1) – me parece bem razoável e aconselhável pra deixar o mapa mais dinâmico, mas antes do bookmark poderia manter todos com a mesmo design. Pattern de transição como 00:22:508 (3,4) -, não necessariamente deve ser igual as anteriores porque eu não to criando uma pattern que necessita ser retinha ou algo do tipo, o importante é esse efeito de ficar atrás do slider tail anterior, e tem uma boa movimentação aqui 00:30:120 (4,1) -
   Outra opção viável tendo em vista como vc fez as marcações no verso da música, é fazer o padrão ondulado+reto e ondulado+ondulado alternadamente em cada um dos bookmarks; 00:16:240 -/00:23:404 -/00:30:568 -/00:37:732 -
3. Você tá fazendo um padrão de hitsound no whistle aqui; 00:17:807 (5) -/00:21:389 (5) -/00:24:971 (5) -, etc, que não se repete nas frases consecutivas, mais especificamente, nos sliderends 00:19:374 (4) -/00:22:956 (4) -/00:26:538 (4) - , no entanto você está usando o whistle na segunda upbeat de todas as frases, 00:16:687 (2) -/00:18:478 (2) -/00:20:269 (2) -/00:22:060 (2) -, etc. Algum motivo em especial pra não usar na ultima upbeat de todas as frases? Acredito que possa ser pra dar mais ênfase no circle 5 das medidas ímpares, 00:17:807 (5) -/00:21:389 (5) -/00:24:971 (5) - , mas não deixa de quebrar a consistência do hitsound. Talvez colocar um inherented point pra diminuir o volume do hitsound no final desses sliders 00:19:374 (4) -/00:22:956 (4) -/00:26:538 (4) -, o que acha? você pode perceber que na maioria dos meus mapas eu uso o whistle pra dar ênfase no vocal e em sua maioria em red ticks, eu deixo os white (sendo eles upbeats ou downbeats) pra serem completos com algum tipo de clap (algum padrão que combine) e finish pra transição em geral, por isso a preferência em ignorar isso. Em outras palavras, eu uso whistle como qualquer outro tipo de instrumento pra completar a música e dar ênfase em outras coisas, não pra complementar e sim criar (?)

Selo Trynna de Q U A L I D A D E , esse daqui é pra rank hein. oremos

1. 00:41:314 (1) - I don't think a spinner fits here. Maybe put it where you did in the other diffs?

1. Good

1. 00:26:090 (3,1) - I think you can make this flow better. Maybe something like this http://puu.sh/uDuit/45d8bc4459.jpg

1. 00:36:837 (3) - If you're going to silence them in 'Habits', do it here too to be consistent.
2. 00:42:210 (3) - ^

1. 00:33:254 (3) - Not a fan of the silenced slider ends, but you missed one here.

Bluekrait wrote:

Trynna's free #modhelp request

[Easy]

1. 00:41:314 (1) - I don't think a spinner fits here. Maybe put it where you did in the other diffs? actually i did it to give players 4 beats rest time as an easy diff should have, but yeah i'm not completely happy with this one, suggestions about what to do here would be fine, i'd really like to keep some kind of spinner here not only one at the very end of the diff

[Normal]

1. Good

[Advanced]

1. 00:26:090 (3,1) - I think you can make this flow better. Maybe something like this http://puu.sh/uDuit/45d8bc4459.jpg hmm i kinda agree with you here, but flow is not bad or something cuz 1 beat till the next note and the AR makes it easier to be prepared to hit the next object, so I think it's fine and cute too

[Hard]

1. 00:36:837 (3) - If you're going to silence them in 'Habits', do it here too to be consistent. missed that one, thank you <3
2. 00:42:210 (3) - ^ ^

[Habits]

1. 00:33:254 (3) - Not a fan of the silenced slider ends, but you missed one here. but there's one on 00:33:590 - . Also, i don't like the idea of silence sliders too, i just did cuz there's no sound on the blue ticks, my intention was to make the clap sound with some extra emphasis and create a 3/4 cool pattern

You're pretty much ready to rank

Delis wrote:

[General]
https://puu.sh/uEpG1/491a87ab2a.wav use this instead of the drum-hitfinish, it has a delay which is over 5ms and causes an unrank.
findbetterqualityofthebg thank you for dropping some effort on it
[Habits]
00:21:053 - remove one of inherited points here, two green lines at the same timing is unrankable. My bad
00:27:434 (2) - nice sotarks slider shape red anchor = soterk
00:32:359 (1) - stacking on the head of 00:31:463 (3) - still flows better and even the aesthetic. or if you feel love to keep the distance between 00:31:911 (4,5,1) - then 00:32:359 (1) - shift the anchor of slidertail to left a bit, it works cool to play. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7540841 ok, will rotate a bit to the left!
00:33:600 - this isn't working properly since it's unsnapped. my bad again
00:34:598 (2) - to be honest this isn't nice as your blanket is messy and flows badly into 00:35:045 (3) - so I would do something 90 degree from previous slider. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7540850 it would make the distance extremely long and i think it's an ok flow till 00:35:045 (3) - but if someone else says it's fucking shit i may consider change it, thanks

this setting is frekingly faggot sorry
[Hard]
00:27:881 (3) - I'd like to move the red point to the center of sliderbody, now it looks ugly and pointless to do IN MY OPINION. I did that king of slider on the whole map fuk but ok i might think on another shape to put in here
00:45:792 (3) - probably better to avoid overlapping, 00:44:896 (1,2) - decreasing the distance of them and then it's easy. Ok

it's whatever but I don't really like these overlaps in this difficulty. sorry again
[Advanced]
these slight overlaps man :v
00:32:807 (2) - the spacing is a bit off while I prefer x0.9 xd fixed
00:42:210 (3) - noo, this sholdn't have been stacked here for sure. all of players would want to move their mouse to play the circle as the music and hitsound provide a good accent for it. i'm avoiding do 2 circles at once spaced from each other, but i just realised it would be a random slider such as 00:38:628 (3) - for example, so yea ur right, changed
00:52:732 (2,3) - the reason why you didn't stack this too? since circles are consistently stacked on every claps which mean the second upbeats. I still disagree to stack them because of the sounds make me feeling really wanna move my hands maybe cuz the vocal has some intensity and stacking it would be weird, so i think it's okay as is, but let's see

[Normal]
00:46:463 (2,1) - I would move them a bit left according to the previous slider shape so you provide a obvious better flow. really? it would make the angle even sharper and idk if i really want it
00:47:359 - are you sure ignoring the beat but 00:46:463 (2) - ? there's still a lack of circles which could follow the beats as it's normal difficulty. yeah yeah, i was focusing on the beats that vocal exists, 00:49:150 (2,2) - was just to create some variation and to avoid such a large pause till the player reach 00:50:045 (3) -

[Easy]
00:19:822 (1) - this flows bad, I'm not focing anything to you but I abusolutely do something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7541300 as it flows very smooth from 00:18:031 (2) - hmmm it makes no difference at all since the player have a lot of time to react and stuff, but ok, agreed and fixed
00:28:777 (2) - ctrl+j this slider makes the flow perfect. fixed
00:39:523 (2) - sotarks changed
00:51:613 (3) - remove whistle. 00:48:031 (3,3) - whistles create some emphasis on vocal, so i'm gonna keep it for now

Left wrote:

NM Q

[General]
Fine

[Easy]
- 00:41:314 (1) - I think u used spinner cuz it's the end of this part of song, but no change from before, no special sound to map with spinner. I think just http://puu.sh/uF0eH/567627bce2.jpg is better. mentioned twice, so yeah, changed
- 00:48:031 (3) - I didn't think this note is necessary. actually sound is so small, almost can't hear. at least turn off whistle sound pls. this is not a different sound or some instrumental stuff, i put it here to give vocal some support, i didn't want to make it full of random sliders
- 00:55:195 (3) - ^ same, but i think it's ok

[Normal]
- NC used too often. consider using per 2 downbeat pls o yeah you're right! my bad

[Advanced]
- Adv->HD Distance gap is too big but NM->Adv gap is too low. how about near 1.17x ? I mean, the concepts here are fine, normal is a common simplify of sounds with 1/2, the adv one is the same thing but denser, so the player can be prepared to click more, the hard has more notes and the spacing change starts, so I guess it's fine already. I could just make the spacing of adv bigger, but i don't feel like doing it for now
- OD 4 is better for spread it would be weird if i just let 2-3-4-6-7, maybe 4.5 is an ok option after all, since it shows the player some kind of difficult change it's gonna happen, and since it's related to [click more] as explained above, OD is a nice thing to change

[Hard]
- 00:30:568 (1,2) - DS too low considering your DS usage the reason why i avoided doing some spacing like 00:34:150 (1,2) - is: this is not the same flow, i'm gonna need some bigger spacing to make it a thing and not weird at all, the reason why 00:30:568 (1,2) - don't need to be so big is: same flow, player can go from the 1 slider head to the 2 slider head easily and it turns into something natural. This is why i'm keeping for now, but if someone else says it need to be changed, k, i must do it

[Habits]
- 00:26:986 (1,2,3) - can make that tail triangle better k, nothing extremely accurate since i map with grid snap on lmao
- 00:35:045 (3,4) - i don't think there's noticable sound in 00:35:493 (4) - . just 1/1 is better. you have a point here, but even if it play as an overmap, the whole diff has patterning like this and is the big deal between hard and [last diff], i guess it's not a real problem if i keep it here, 00:31:911 (4) - also have 0 feedback from instrumental and the vocal is not that important here either, so yeah
*Hitsound
- 00:45:792 (3) - no sound in tail, i think whistle in 00:46:463 (4) - is better cuz there's sound as commented on another mod, my whistle here is trying to add something to the song, not cover already setted sounds, if i just spam it on the red tick the hitsound would be boring and repetitive.
- 00:47:583 (3,4) - ^
- 00:52:956 (3,4) - ^
- 00:54:747 (3,4) - ^
- 00:50:045 (4) - whistle if u want intentional pause of whistles here, so it can give some emphasis to the next patterning and hitsounding for another section
-> same for lower diffs

decent mapset, good luck!

1. Metadata confirmation. Your current one is correct.
2. Since you don't have a storyboard you peobably should uncheck Widescreen Support in all difficulties.

1. 00:17:807 (3) - there is practically no sound except for a very faded beat. Probably it's better to avoid mapping it since it's so weak. How about something like this?
2. 00:36:837 (6) - this one is better when split into two circles. There is nothing that would support the sliding sound in-between these object, so the slider feels out of place.
3. 00:43:105 (1) - not exactly sure of having two spinners. Even the Easy difficulty didn't have a spinner here, I'd rather insert some object instead as to keep the mapping more dynamic.
4. 00:52:956 (4,5,1) - this pattern feels a bit rough in terms of flow. let's restructure to make it slightly more natural?

1. 00:17:807 (3) - there is practically no sound except for a very faded beat. Probably it's better to avoid mapping it since it's so weak.
   Note: 00:22:060 (2) - for a very similar reason this one would feel better as a single circle placed on 00:22:284 - and then 00:25:642 (2) - and 00:29:225 (2) - here for consistency.
2. 00:38:404 (2,3) - this can be made into a more natural shape. try a circular pattern
3. 00:43:105 (1) - not exactly sure of having two spinners. Even the Easy difficulty didn't have a spinner here, I'd rather insert some object instead as to keep the mapping more dynamic.
   
   I can't agree with the rhythm choice here as a plenty of sliders either begin on something very weak.

1. The same kind of thing happens here, for instance here, 00:16:687 (2) - when the head of the slider begins on a very quiet beat and leaves the actual stronger beat on 00:16:911 - without anything to click on. Remember that the head of each slider requires a click, therefore giving a lot of feedback. While when it comes to the slidertail it is alot easier as players can just stop holding the key (no feedback recieved).
   
   this happens more, as the vocals aren't always snapped on the wite ticks and the main beat is kind of variable. So, you do have to listen to the song to geta better idea of where the stronger beats are. it is mostly about the non-kiai parts,but it can be noticed in patterns like 00:48:927 (2) - as well.
   

1. See the Hard difficulty for reference on the rhythm thingy.
   
   apart from that it feels pretty nice. Even the whole thing with the sliders is not very noticeable as the rhythm is dense and it's just that small part that I disagree with.

Bakari wrote:

Hey! Heyo

[General]

1. Metadata confirmation. Your current one is correct. thank you!
2. Since you don't have a storyboard you peobably should uncheck Widescreen Support in all difficulties. afaik this is not a rule but ok~

[Normal]

1. 00:17:807 (3) - there is practically no sound except for a very faded beat. Probably it's better to avoid mapping it since it's so weak. How about something like this? uuh I can hear this in such ok way tbh, though i understand the song is getting louder and it will be easily to get in the middle/end, but this is not a big deal to get in the early notes in my opinion
2. 00:36:837 (6) - this one is better when split into two circles. There is nothing that would support the sliding sound in-between these object, so the slider feels out of place. honestly there's nothing new here imo this is a transition pattern combining this pattern 00:32:135 (3,4,5,6) - and 00:34:150 (1,2) - this one, but there's a triplet sound on 00:37:284 - so i make it between the slider tail + circle + slider head to feel like a common pattern and playing softer (I mean, "triplet" is not the right word since it's 1/2 anyway but still)
3. 00:43:105 (1) - not exactly sure of having two spinners. Even the Easy difficulty didn't have a spinner here, I'd rather insert some object instead as to keep the mapping more dynamic. fixed
4. 00:52:956 (4,5,1) - this pattern feels a bit rough in terms of flow. let's restructure to make it slightly more natural? kk fixd

[Advanced]

1. 00:17:807 (3) - there is practically no sound except for a very faded beat. Probably it's better to avoid mapping it since it's so weak. same as commented on normal thing
   Note: 00:22:060 (2) - for a very similar reason this one would feel better as a single circle placed on 00:22:284 - and then 00:25:642 (2) - and 00:29:225 (2) - here for consistency.
2. 00:38:404 (2,3) - this can be made into a more natural shape. try a circular pattern I don't really want to make the circles overlap (though it doesn't happen in-game i guess), but i rotated the 3 slider a bit so it should be fine now!
3. 00:43:105 (1) - not exactly sure of having two spinners. Even the Easy difficulty didn't have a spinner here, I'd rather insert some object instead as to keep the mapping more dynamic. ur right!
   
   I can't agree with the rhythm choice here as a plenty of sliders either begin on something very weak.

[Hard]

1. The same kind of thing happens here, for instance here, 00:16:687 (2) - when the head of the slider begins on a very quiet beat and leaves the actual stronger beat on 00:16:911 - without anything to click on. Remember that the head of each slider requires a click, therefore giving a lot of feedback. While when it comes to the slidertail it is alot easier as players can just stop holding the key (no feedback recieved).
   
   this happens more, as the vocals aren't always snapped on the wite ticks and the main beat is kind of variable. So, you do have to listen to the song to geta better idea of where the stronger beats are. it is mostly about the non-kiai parts,but it can be noticed in patterns like 00:48:927 (2) - as well.

[Habits]

1. See the Hard difficulty for reference on the rhythm thingy.
   
   apart from that it feels pretty nice. Even the whole thing with the sliders is not very noticeable as the rhythm is dense and it's just that small part that I disagree with.

I guess it could use some more work, especially in terms of the rhythm in Adv/Hard/Insane, but it is not bad. I like the style and flow. Keep it up!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Best of luck!

• [Easy:]
  [list:1337]00:16:240 - Wow this is really boring and repetitive. I encourage you to go back through and come up with more fun ways to map this rhythm.
  00:48:031 (3,3,3) - These are mapping literally nothing. Why not go to the vocals here to allow for some more creative patterns?
  
  For 55 seconds, it shouldn't be asking too much to go back through and try a bit harder to come up with unique patterns beginners can have fun with! Remember, they can get bored too!

• 00:43:105 (3) - There's a clap on this in easy. o3o

• 
  00:26:090 (3,1) - The flow here isn't so good. You could ctrl+g (1).

• 00:45:344 (2) - There's a lot of sliders like these during the chorus that literally start on nothing. This is a rhythm game, so try and get it to match the rhythm. Since there's only noise on the red tick it lands on, why not have it start there? Or use a circle?

• Im not sure why you cut this down. It seemed like there were some interesting bits after it.
  Good samples :0

PolkaMocha wrote:

[General:]

• [Easy:]
  [list:1337]00:16:240 - Wow this is really boring and repetitive. I encourage you to go back through and come up with more fun ways to map this rhythm. honestly, the song is pretty repetitive to map 1/1 with the background sounds, and i'm not the kind of person that really likes variation on easier diffs, it can be a headache
  00:48:031 (3,3,3) - These are mapping literally nothing. Why not go to the vocals here to allow for some more creative patterns? my intention here was literally help the vocal when it holds the words a bit, and i think it's fine tho . but let me know if you have any suggestions to help me with it!
  
  For 55 seconds, it shouldn't be asking too much to go back through and try a bit harder to come up with unique patterns beginners can have fun with! Remember, they can get bored too! I appreciate your opinion here, thank you!

[Normal:]

• 00:43:105 (3) - There's a clap on this in easy. o3o thank you, it helped me to realize a lot of hs erros between normal/adv/hard that i forgot to fix when removed the spinner on Bakari's mod

[Advanced:]

• 
  00:26:090 (3,1) - The flow here isn't so good. You could ctrl+g (1). I don't want to ctrl+g since there's a lot of time to react to it and move your mouse till the next pattern, but maybe I made it too extreme for newbies, so I changed a bit!

[Hard:]

• 00:45:344 (2) - There's a lot of sliders like these during the chorus that literally start on nothing. This is a rhythm game, so try and get it to match the rhythm. Since there's only noise on the red tick it lands on, why not have it start there? Or use a circle? I may consider it, there are now 2 trying to make me put emphasis on the drums rip

[Afteword:]

• Im not sure why you cut this down. It seemed like there were some interesting bits after it. oh I made by own set cuz my original GD got rejected by SrSky so that's why the mp3/tags/stuff are kinda the same lo
  Good samples :0

Trynna wrote:

[Advanced:]

• 
  00:26:090 (3,1) - The flow here isn't so good. You could ctrl+g (1). I don't want to ctrl+g since there's a lot of time to react to it and move your mouse till the next pattern, but maybe I made it too extreme for newbies, so I changed a bit!
  
  I MEANT FLIP IT TO FACE THE OTHER WAY MB MB

PolkaMocha wrote:

Trynna wrote:

[Advanced:]

• 
  00:26:090 (3,1) - The flow here isn't so good. You could ctrl+g (1). I don't want to ctrl+g since there's a lot of time to react to it and move your mouse till the next pattern, but maybe I made it too extreme for newbies, so I changed a bit!
  
  I MEANT FLIP IT TO FACE THE OTHER WAY MB MB