JayJay-San wrote:

Hey, It's Jay from the modding queue <3

Dead On Arrival

01:10:115 - 01:37:911 - Kiai Time seems long but they are fairly separated. I think it's fine because I want 01:24:028 (1) - to have a impact (the starburst there)

01:09:463 (4,5,6,7) - This sounds like there could be a stream here, it is a white tick after all. But you can keep it this way because it emphasizes on the sound. It's better to follow the drums to avoid more confusing rhythms

01:28:810 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Most of this part is in the quadrant there, maybe space that out more? okay

01:37:289 (7,8,9,10,11,1) - Maybe flip that stream around? Seems like it would be a little hard to read for a 4 star. just made it near (7)

01:58:810 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe move that down a bit? The note is going off the editor for me. (Look over this, maybe I'm wrong) seems fine xd

Hard

00:54:897 (2,3,4,5,6) - The 2 and the 3 are stacked? maybe make the 5 and the 6 stacked for consistency? or unstack them unstacked that 2 and 3

01:58:376 (4,5,6) - The other notes in this section are sliders, why not this one? Finishing triple? yep it's a finisher rhythm

I gotta say, the use of the continued patterns of this map is really amazing. It shows your consistency throughout the map.

Good Luck!

1. 00:45:767 (1,2,3,4) - the rhythm is a little hard to read for new players imo,how about using more simple rhythm,like this?
2. 01:02:723 (4,1,2) - just my visual preference
   img

   
3. 01:36:854 - remove whistle here?cuz heres the only place with the whistle in Kiai part
4. 02:04:028 (1) - just map like this is better imo

1. 00:47:071 (3) - its better to map with a 1/2 slider here imo
2. nothing...

1. 00:36:636 (4) - map as a 1/2 rhythm like the highest diff?
2. 00:40:115 (4) - 00:50:549 (4) - ↑
3. 01:22:941 (3,4) - unstack for the drums?

1. 00:36:854 (1) - cancel the nc and add nc 00:37:071 (8) - ?
2. 00:30:549 (3) - 330,95?just wanna 00:30:115 (1,2,3) - to be a regular triangle
   img

   
3. 00:55:115 - hitsound,additions-drum whistle?
4. 00:55:984 (8,1) - a bit close imo,move 00:56:202 (1) - to 299,226?
5. 01:09:789 (6,7,1) - how abot like this?
   ctrlG&H 01:09:789 (6,7) - ,then CtrlG 01:10:115 (1) - ,its better for playing doubles i mo
   
   overall nicee

Nanashima Asami wrote:

m4m back!
sorry for the delay;w;
[Easy]

1. 00:45:767 (1,2,3,4) - the rhythm is a little hard to read for new players imo,how about using more simple rhythm,like this? I'll see for more opinions, I currently like my rhyhtm xd
2. 01:02:723 (4,1,2) - just my visual preference
   img

   
   how could I make it like that because slider was just copy pasta
3. 01:36:854 - remove whistle here?cuz heres the only place with the whistle in Kiai part all diffs have this drum-hitwhistle
4. 02:04:028 (1) - just map like this is better imo I intended to have spinner for scores not to be the same in the scoreboard

[Normal]

1. 00:47:071 (3) - its better to map with a 1/2 slider here imo I don't want to spam a lot of 1/2 rhythms here so I put a little pause here
2. nothing...

[Hard]

1. 00:36:636 (4) - map as a 1/2 rhythm like the highest diff? nope, it emphasizes the guitar
2. 00:40:115 (4) - 00:50:549 (4) - ↑ ^^
3. 01:22:941 (3,4) - unstack for the drums? it plays better in this way xd so keeping for now

[Dead on Arrival]

1. 00:36:854 (1) - cancel the nc and add nc 00:37:071 (8) - ? okay fixed
2. 00:30:549 (3) - 330,95?just wanna 00:30:115 (1,2,3) - to be a regular triangle
   img

   
   fixed
3. 00:55:115 - hitsound,additions-drum whistle? idk what you mean here xd
4. 00:55:984 (8,1) - a bit close imo,move 00:56:202 (1) - to 299,226? sure
5. 01:09:789 (6,7,1) - how abot like this?
   ctrlG&H 01:09:789 (6,7) - ,then CtrlG 01:10:115 (1) - ,its better for playing doubles i mo okayyyyy
   
   overall nicee

sorry for my nazi mod,im too noob to find any problems with such a nice set... It's okay xd
goodluck!

Rad- wrote:

Hello from my queue.

General
Being a short song, you shouldn't leave like 30 seconds of the start completely unmapped, specially when there are rhythms that justify it, at least start the maps on 00:07:506 I'll see for more opinions on this because I don't feel that sth that encourages me to map those 30 seconds xd

Easy
01:08:593 (3) - This could go with a NC eh I'll refuse, I want to keep the consistency of every 2 measuremnt NCs
01:52:941 (2) - This kinda confuses beginners, because the player was used of 2 minutes with minimalred ticks, only being once on sliders, but then they are faced with this pattern and that is sure to cause some breaks towards the end, so i suggest keeping the map as it was. I had the same feeling on this but I did this for rhythm diversion.
01:58:810 (1) - Too sharp for an Easy I don't think so xd

Normal
01:36:202 (1) - Remove NC for consistency okay

Hard
00:57:941 (1) - Place this circle on top of circle 2 instead for better reading okay
01:22:941 (3) - Stack circle 3 on top of circle 2 instead because both have a snare sound so should be placed on same spot to better fit the music fixed

That's it really of what i could fine, you did a very good job with the map itself, followed the song perfectly, and really nice work on the hitsounds. (I really enjoy more playing/thru edit than hearing the song itself simply because your hitsounding improved the song greatly )

Good Luck!

1. Tag - Episode 7 seems not that necessary and having it in your map info seems better imo

1. 00:40:549 (1,2,3) - base on the guitar 00:40:658 (2) should be removed
2. 00:57:071 (4,5,6) - not a issue actually but those combo seems having similar color with the background
3. 01:07:723 (7,8,9,10) - hmm they do not strictly follows the guitar. while if you delay 9 by 1/4 beat there is another hitsound conflict when 01:07:941 do not have any note. There is a possible solution by making 01:07:832 (8) a 1/4 slider but that is also weird for you are not often using this kind of pattern (except 01:37:071 (6,7) etc.) within the map. So I just gonna point it out and it is up to you.
4. 02:00:549 (3,4) - blanket nazi
5. 02:04:028 (3,4) - ctrl+g. when 01:58:810 (1,2,3,4) have same direction (anti-clockwise) 02:02:289 (1,2,3,4) should also have so if considering consistency and flow.

1. 00:41:202 (2,3) - when overlapping 2 circles it is kinda like emphasizing each other or representing similar/identical elements in the music, which seems little bit strange if the music do not support this (for example, in contrast with 01:22:723 (2,3)).

1. 01:26:636 (6,7,1) - blanket nazi

Curisu wrote:

From Queue
The map itself is amazingly comfortable to play so I would just giving some minor suggestion

Error
Major Issue
Major Suggestion
Minor Suggestion

[General]

1. Tag - Episode 7 seems not that necessary and having it in your map info seems better imo I have another ranked mapset of an insert song came from anime having the same situation (episode # on tags) and no one objected with it so I think it's okay

[Dead on Arrival]

1. 00:40:549 (1,2,3) - base on the guitar 00:40:658 (2) should be removed but there is still some slide effect of the guitar there so I put a triple
2. 00:57:071 (4,5,6) - not a issue actually but those combo seems having similar color with the background I'll see for more opinions
3. 01:07:723 (7,8,9,10) - hmm they do not strictly follows the guitar. while if you delay 9 by 1/4 beat there is another hitsound conflict when 01:07:941 do not have any note. There is a possible solution by making 01:07:832 (8) a 1/4 slider but that is also weird for you are not often using this kind of pattern (except 01:37:071 (6,7) etc.) within the map. So I just gonna point it out and it is up to you. Actually that point of yours is not a problem but the real problem is in the 01:07:723 because there's no dominant sound exist there so thanking you for pointing this out even though it's not really the problem
4. 02:00:549 (3,4) - blanket nazi eh what to blanket??
5. 02:04:028 (3,4) - ctrl+g. when 01:58:810 (1,2,3,4) have same direction (anti-clockwise) 02:02:289 (1,2,3,4) should also have so if considering consistency and flow. okay

[Hard]

1. 00:41:202 (2,3) - when overlapping 2 circles it is kinda like emphasizing each other or representing similar/identical elements in the music, which seems little bit strange if the music do not support this (for example, in contrast with 01:22:723 (2,3)). You're right but it's pretty overrated if you unstacked all of them or neither makes an uncomfortable flow if I stack 00:41:419 (3) - on 00:41:636 (4) - so purely I just did this for playabilty

[Normal]

1. 01:26:636 (6,7,1) - blanket nazi where's the blanket lol

[/list]

[Easy]
Fine

Good luck

samosita wrote:

jellow! from mod qq

mods

[General]

1. I'd honestly start mapping here 00:14:463 - (obvious loud finish here hehe) sayang ang ganda pa naman ng song huhu I keep saying that I'll gather more opinions but this time, I would really say no because I don't really want to map that part xd

[Normal]

1. 00:35:332 (1) - to emphasize this finish here, i think that you can make 00:34:897 (6) as slider then end it at 00:35:115 but there's no sound in that blue tick
2. 01:22:506 - add a circle here to help build up the next drummy part. maybe stack? slider train will be too long and I think being the drummy part at the 01:22:723 (5,6,7) - is enough for this part.
3. 00:49:028 (4) - stack to next slider to emphasize finish? Unstacks are better than stacking for emphasis, I'll be using thos reasoning for the same below
4. 01:13:376 (7) - ^
5. 01:16:854 (7) - ^
6. 01:20:332 (7) - ^

[Hard]

1. 00:52:941 (2,3,4) - hmm, let's try to be consistent with the pattern here: 00:50:115 (3,4) They sound different because at 00:50:115 (3,4) - the guitar is continuous while at 00:52:941 (2,3,4) - you can hear that 00:52:941 (2) - this guitar doesn't occur in the previous same places
2. 00:56:528 - ill add a circle here along with the stack to emphasize finish It's not always about emphasizing the finish, there's no sound here so whats the point of having circle?
3. 01:11:093 - i think adding a circle here in between sliders seem appropriate since it's already kiai and to spice things up sound doesn't exist on that but on 01:10:767 (3) - which is I intended to make as a slider, same reasoning below
4. 01:14:571 - ^
5. 01:18:049 - ^
6. 01:20:441 - ^(maybe stack with next slider?)
7. 01:30:876 - ^(and maybe stack with next slider?)

[Dead on Arrival]

1. 00:35:223 - add circle to emphasize finish same for hard, there's no certain sound here
2. 00:56:202 (1) - to emphasize finish here, stack this with 00:56:636 (3) and remove 00:56:419 (2). if you're gonna follow this, change nc to 00:56:636 (3) but it'll ruin my pattern on following the drums, keeping it
3. 01:02:941 (7,8,1) - change the spacing of this stack the same as the one at 01:04:680 (7,8,1) since i noticed you use that kind of spacing when there's that loud guitar sound okay
4. 01:46:419 (9,10,1) - ^ ^^
5. 01:48:158 (7,8,1) - ^ ^^

Nice song!! pretty neat map haha (couldn't comment much)

1. It really makes me sad the fact you didn't map the first 20 seconds! Don't be lazy!

Sotarks wrote:

Hi~

[General]

1. It really makes me sad the fact you didn't map the first 20 seconds! Don't be lazy! no xd

[Dead on Arrival]
00:27:941 (3,4,5) - x67 y236 to reduce the emphasis here for kicks okay
00:35:115 (6,1) - don't stack those it kills emphasis on 00:35:332 (1) - 's finish cymbal did sth
00:36:202 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - those could be awesome if you do 1/4 slider + circle ! okay
01:28:810 (3,1) - avoid overlap ? fixed
i really think you can use more diversity in your 1/4, like you always use triplet all other the map, try some 1/4 slider + circle, 1/2 slider + 2 circle, etc etc, it wil just give you diversity for your map so it won't be the same stuff all other again. I tried

[Hard]
01:54:245 (3) - this is not supposed to be 1/4! it is xd
01:55:332 (1) - make this shape more even? tried
02:04:028 (1) - why spinner? because it's low diff xd

easy normal 2 clean 4 me!!!
sorry for shitmod !!
gl nice song choice as always S A W A N O M U S I C O F C O U R S E

Pentori wrote:

w
[General]
offset sounds a little early, try 558 okay fixed
00:27:941 - two soft-claps and a drum-finish sound better here, the triplet consists of snares oh right applied

[Easy]
01:09:680 (4) - drums use a different that doesn't actually include the white tick. removing the circle instead would probably be a better option than mapping something that doesnt exist
01:50:984 (4) - ^ similar thing here, perhaps a circle would be nicer Fixed all!

[Normal]
01:49:028 (2) - awkward beat to follow, 01:44:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - generally worked off the white ticks to follow kick drums + vocals, but here its skipped 01:49:245 - in favour of a weaker beat 01:49:028 did sth

[Hard]
00:29:245 (3) - dont really see the need to extend this, stuff like 00:34:463 (3) - has the vocal on the blue tick, but here ur just skipping the guitar 00:29:463 fixed
00:41:202 (2,3,4,5) - the music picks up from 00:41:419 (3) - yet you have no flow there cos of stack. instead you have the movement beginning from 00:41:636 (4) - which is kinda insignificant. i'd try putting the jump onto 00:41:419 (3) - like http://puu.sh/vq3zZ/14e2775c7c.jpg for example your pattern looks great, applied
00:48:384 (4) - the 3/4 here isn't as obvious as this stuff 00:43:166 (3,3) . i think u should just stick to mapping the 1/2 okay
00:52:941 (2) - seems like a weird place to use a 1/4 repeat. u normally kept them to white tick guitars 00:50:115 (3,4) - 00:39:680 (3,4) - but here u have it on the red tick and the guitar isn't as pronounced :< there's a little bit difference at the guitar, you'll notice it if you listen to the song slower and actually fits on that part
00:54:897 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - the transition could be a bit better. i'd use a rhythm like http://puu.sh/vq413/0b19c9a7bc.jpg this way ur able to emphasise the four drums at 00:55:332 - then all the weaker red ticks are covered by slider ends okay
01:02:289 (3,4,5,1) - try give these more spacing so the visual distance looks the same. auto stack kinda makes the spacing look wonky http://puu.sh/vq4fn/c0c21680ba.jpg same for others like 01:05:767 (4,5,6) - 01:46:419 (8,9,1,2) - 01:47:506 (4,5,6,1) increased the distance sth like 1.5x
01:48:702 (3) - removing this beat would allow u to prioritise the guitar triple more 01:48:158 (5,6,1) . also this combo already has a pretty high 1/4 density okay
01:54:245 (3,4) - ctrl g rhythm? consistency with 01:52:723 (3) - 01:56:202 (3) they're different/don't sound the same in my ears

[Dead on Arrival]
00:34:463 (4,5) - 3/4 rhythm here? vocals are really powerful here, so i dont think a stack is appropriate okay
00:37:941 (6) - spacing this more evenly between 00:37:289 (3,4) - would look cleaner imo fixed
00:48:376 (4,5) - same as hard fixed
00:52:506 (6,1) - unstack, downbeat here 00:52:723 (1) okaaay
01:07:506 (6,7,8,9) - rhythm's a bit difficult to catch onto, because the gaps in rhythm change between circles. u really dont need to map the kick on 01:07:941 - cause the guitar is much louder and should be prioritised. maybe a rhythm like https://puu.sh/vq4WB/be95bfff4b.jpg ? The rhythm you suggested works too but I think the spacing between 01:07:297 (4,5,6,7,8) - makes it not really hard to catch and i don't want this accentuation of guitar 01:07:949 (8) - be ignored.
01:13:049 - 01:16:528 - 01:20:006 - it feels like ur missing a lot of the blue tick vocals here, though your hard seems to give them attention. u could definitely make the kiai more interesting by mapping these instead of simplifying to the 1/2. rhythms like http://puu.sh/vq5aD/4b5ee5ec43.jpg can cover blue tick vocals as well as provide a more difficult pattern than hard tried my best to cope up with the vocals and did different rhythms on that parts
01:24:680 (2,4) - eee blanket okay
01:51:419 (3) - similar to the one at 01:07:506 - but this time there's no sound here :c fixed

cool mapset! u can call me for a recheck

Janpai wrote:

If someone could suggest a better flow at 01:19:688 (4,5,6,7,8) - would be appreacited

Kalibe wrote:

Janpai wrote:

If someone could suggest a better flow at 01:19:688 (4,5,6,7,8) - would be appreacited

pattern is fine imo, though u could move 01:20:340 (8) - bit closer, feels kinda outspaced -> try maybe 167/155 ?

Kagetsu wrote:

soon

1. 00:36:210 (3,4,5,6) - i think this is the only instance where you use 2 1/4 sliders in a row to represent the guitar sounds? idk it feels a bit inconsistent to me, not a big deal tho
2. 00:52:731 (1,2,3,4) - it goes against your previous rhythm choices, you were using 1/4 after the white ticks for the guitar, but the pattern suddenly changes here xd, tl,dr: use ctrl+g
3. 00:57:731 (7) - 01:01:210 (8) - kinda dislike how those stuff is played, i mean, it feels a bit too jumpy for a calm section like this, how about using triplets instead? (again, just personal preference)
4. 01:12:731 (6,7,8) - 01:16:210 (4,5,6) - i don't really get why is the 1/4 distance so big here, it looks like you did for the sake of patterns in the second instance but yeah, it looks kinda weird for me
5. 01:55:992 (3,5,7) - uh... same thing as previous, this is kinda worse cuz 01:56:427 (5,7) - contains guitar beats while 01:55:992 (3) - doesn't

1. 00:52:731 (1,2) - same as insane
2. 01:34:471 (1,2) - i wouldn't stack vocals, but it seems you ran out of space so yea xd
3. 01:48:601 (2,3,4,5) - kinda confusing that you're using stacks for two different time gaps

Kagetsu wrote:

[Dead on Arrival]

1. 00:36:210 (3,4,5,6) - i think this is the only instance where you use 2 1/4 sliders in a row to represent the guitar sounds? idk it feels a bit inconsistent to me, not a big deal tho I reverted back to triples, my fault on agreeing on Sotarks suggestion xd
2. 00:52:731 (1,2,3,4) - it goes against your previous rhythm choices, you were using 1/4 after the white ticks for the guitar, but the pattern suddenly changes here xd, tl,dr: use ctrl+g Well the guitar is really different here compared to others (you can listen slower so you would hear it) so I think this is fine
3. 00:57:731 (7) - 01:01:210 (8) - kinda dislike how those stuff is played, i mean, it feels a bit too jumpy for a calm section like this, how about using triplets instead? (again, just personal preference) okay
4. 01:12:731 (6,7,8) - 01:16:210 (4,5,6) - i don't really get why is the 1/4 distance so big here, it looks like you did for the sake of patterns in the second instance but yeah, it looks kinda weird for me reduced the distance to 0.8 hope it's fine now
5. 01:55:992 (3,5,7) - uh... same thing as previous, this is kinda worse cuz 01:56:427 (5,7) - contains guitar beats while 01:55:992 (3) - doesn't fixed

[Hard]

1. 00:52:731 (1,2) - same as insane same xd
2. 01:34:471 (1,2) - i wouldn't stack vocals, but it seems you ran out of space so yea xd I just stacked 01:34:471 (1) - on 01:34:253 (5) - to make vocals at 01:34:688 (2) - have more impact
3. 01:48:601 (2,3,4,5) - kinda confusing that you're using stacks for two different time gaps did an unstack

yea call me back xxd lmao that was fast