1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Graveyard
show more
posted
helo

normal :


00:09:122 (3,1) - DS is quite misleading this can be mixed up with 1/1 stuff pretty easily, i'd suggest you either stack like you did before or space it more

00:18:114 (1) - in this section i think it's probably better to map this note 00:18:114 - and the strings here 00:20:113 - than mapping spinners to that faint vocal thing

00:06:124 (1,2) - flow is kinda ew here. Having the slider point at the next beat is probably a bit better

Advanced:


00:09:122 (3) - probably better if you would separate the two last sounds from the first since they have that distinct cymbal noise. also the whistle is gross

00:17:115 (5,6,7,1) - overlap is very questionable. Flowbreak is rather awkward too for this kind of difficulty

In the kiai density seems rather low. Right now it is a lot like your normal. Adding a few 1/4 sliders would make sense here so that this actually feels like an advanced :(. this might also cause issues with spread since normal is full of 1/1 and hard is almost all 1/4 there

Sometimes I also feel like your aesthetics are a bit inconsistent. That doesn't make your map less playable but it really prevents you from achieveing a well defined style and kinda looks messy.
For example angles : Just looking at the first few notes you seem to go for mostly horizontal and vertical angles but suddently 00:04:126 (1) - is angled by 45° or so. feels kinda out of place because it kind of points at nothing either lol
00:08:123 (1,2,3) - Here spacing is not equal between objects. 2 feels a lot closer to 1 than it is to 3
00:12:119 (1,2) - weird angles again
etc

Hard :



00:05:874 (1,2) - while first one makes sense this Nc doesnt there are more of them and i think they're dumb, there is no real reason to put them there, nothing important really justifies them

The map isn't bad but io still have the same remark as normal on aesthetics

Some more :
00:20:113 (1,2) - 00:21:112 (3,4,5) - either gradually increase spacing on one of them or make them all the same spacing. gradually increasing is good tho because music goes up in pitch

00:24:609 (2) - looks rather curved compared to the other ones

00:36:099 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - if this had a nice even curve it woudl look way better i think. right now it flattens out with time looks rather weird



Ok I think that's it.
Things might be a bit unclear so if anything is unclear yell at me ingame
Gl!
posted

Krfawy wrote:

Hello, as requested in #modhelp o3o/

Normal
  1. Maybe AR4.5 for a better AR-spread? This shouldn't ravish the readability of this map as both settings are totally fine here.
  2. 00:05:125 (4,1) - A nazi thing, but the stack can be slightly improved. I tried? ;w;
  3. 00:16:615 (2,3) - I would select these two and move them a bit to the right, for example to [X=238 | Y=140] so the whole pattern with the actual and the very previous combo do not seem like a cluster (right now the fourth slider 00:15:616 (4) - and the second slider 00:16:615 (2) - are almost touching each other and it is not that appealing ;3;) Agree.
  4. 00:36:099 (1,2,3,4) - If you rotate it for 20 degrees and place it on the same [X] position but a little higher (for example on [Y=109]), the pattern will keep the consistent spacing set for the kiai section and the second and the third sliders won't touch the HP bar in 1024x768 resolution. :3 Oh okay
  5. 00:37:598 (4) - Personally I would put a (normal?) finish here or something that would emphasize the very sound here that reminds me of an alarm or tuba. XD ,w, sure


Advanced
  1. 00:36:599 (3,4,5) - To be honest I am not enthusiastic to that part of the map becoming quieter and quieter. If you compare it to the music going it rather should be becoming louder and more noticable. Also, the hitsounds here would be very benefitial, just the similar ones as in the Normal difficulty. However, the way you did it in the Hard difficulty is fascinating and the Hard difficulty should be intact there. I'm not too sure why the hitsounds are like this.. I don't remember putting them that way. Fixed xp


Hard
  1. The only thing that makes me wonder is the fact there are those breaks when they would be replaced with spinners so the "slooow-slow-fast-faaaast" patterns would look and play even better with the spins stressing the synthesisers and the sliders stressing the violins. *shrug*


Nice set. o/ Good luck! o3o/
posted

BOUYAAA wrote:

helo

normal :


00:09:122 (3,1) - DS is quite misleading this can be mixed up with 1/1 stuff pretty easily, i'd suggest you either stack like you did before or space it more I think it's alright

00:18:114 (1) - in this section i think it's probably better to map this note 00:18:114 - and the strings here 00:20:113 - than mapping spinners to that faint vocal thing Nah

00:06:124 (1,2) - flow is kinda ew here. Having the slider point at the next beat is probably a bit better This was intentional and it's not even ew ;w;

Advanced:


00:09:122 (3) - probably better if you would separate the two last sounds from the first since they have that distinct cymbal noise. also the whistle is gross Remove whistle. Keep slider.

00:17:115 (5,6,7,1) - overlap is very questionable. Flowbreak is rather awkward too for this kind of difficulty

In the kiai density seems rather low. Right now it is a lot like your normal. Adding a few 1/4 sliders would make sense here so that this actually feels like an advanced :(. this might also cause issues with spread since normal is full of 1/1 and hard is almost all 1/4 there There are quite a bit of 1/4 slider? ^^;

Sometimes I also feel like your aesthetics are a bit inconsistent. That doesn't make your map less playable but it really prevents you from achieveing a well defined style and kinda looks messy.
For example angles : Just looking at the first few notes you seem to go for mostly horizontal and vertical angles but suddently 00:04:126 (1) - is angled by 45° or so. feels kinda out of place because it kind of points at nothing either lol I wanted this because it contrasts (6) and gives a "drop" to (2)
00:08:123 (1,2,3) - Here spacing is not equal between objects. 2 feels a lot closer to 1 than it is to 3 Well it's not *shrugs*
00:12:119 (1,2) - weird angles again tru
etc

Hard :



00:05:874 (1,2) - while first one makes sense this Nc doesnt there are more of them and i think they're dumb, there is no real reason to put them there, nothing important really justifies them

The map isn't bad but io still have the same remark as normal on aesthetics

Some more :
00:20:113 (1,2) - 00:21:112 (3,4,5) - either gradually increase spacing on one of them or make them all the same spacing. gradually increasing is good tho because music goes up in pitch They are all increasing and raising SV but I'll space them more I guess

00:24:609 (2) - looks rather curved compared to the other ones they're actually all scaled

00:36:099 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - if this had a nice even curve it woudl look way better i think. right now it flattens out with time looks rather weird Intended. The SV and spacing gets smaller



Ok I think that's it.
Things might be a bit unclear so if anything is unclear yell at me ingame
Gl!
posted
invader zim my ass xd xd no
[normal]
00:05:125 (4) - mak 2 circles pleas thx is importnt sund

00:09:122 (3) - mak dis 1/2 revrs slidr thx

00:17:115 (3) - ^

00:18:114 (1,1,1) - i don tink dis is legall
[advanc]
00:04:875 (3,4) - dis mite b 2 spooki for noobs

00:16:116 (1,2) - ^
[h4rd]
00:05:250 (6) - no imprnt soud her

00:17:864 - do col slidr or smth
posted

[[Pika]] wrote:

invader zim my ass xd xd no
[normal]
00:05:125 (4) - mak 2 circles pleas thx is importnt sund no. the synth raises in pitch then disappears.

00:09:122 (3) - mak dis 1/2 revrs slidr thx no thx

00:17:115 (3) - ^

00:18:114 (1,1,1) - i don tink dis is legall whatever
[advanc]
00:04:875 (3,4) - dis mite b 2 spooki for noobs rip noobs

00:16:116 (1,2) - ^
[h4rd]
00:05:250 (6) - no imprnt soud her Sorry but there's a snare here :/

00:17:864 - do col slidr or smth no
posted
GREETINGS MAPPER

mayb take uninherited timing point to 00:02:128 - so it works better with NC mod
00:03:127 (4) - x:120 y:168
tbh consider placing note at 00:18:114 -
00:22:111 - 00:26:108 - these are too loud imo
00:24:109 - could you curve these sliders a little less? imo curved sliders look better when they are less curved
00:30:104 - you can space after 1/4 sliders a little more because of slider leniency, its actually more awkward to play 1/4 sliders that are close to each other than the ones that are spaced more imo but that would require you doing this section entirely
00:37:598 (7) - i would like a 1/1 slider here because of extended sound
posted
35995

[- - Advanced - -]
  1. 00:17:115 (1,2,3,1) - Well, what's this purpose of this overlap under these three circles? I kinda don't feel right about it. The structure is well-made, but it doesn't seem pretty much of a distinct type for a flow like that.
  2. 00:22:111 (1) - Since the HP rate is quite a bit high, I think leaving a blank on a whole single track is probably not the best idea. It nearly drained almost a quarter of the HP on gameplay, but what if a little-newbie player is pretty low on that part? Maybe adding a few more notes, starting at this point, would be much obliged. Good aesthetics, but be careful with gameplay and its audience's view too!

[- - Hard - -]
  1. 00:09:871 (1) - 00:13:868 (1) - Ehhmm, Why adding new combos here? Doesn't really fit for some kind of impact or whatso, and just before the downbeat too in my personal view. I guess laying them off by removing those extra new combos may be better to be honest.
  2. 00:16:615 (3,4,5,1) - The distance spacing here is quite too random in placements, even in snapping them while dragging these circles anywhere. It doesn't seem to balance pretty well at all. I would recommend using a sufficient distance spacing, by around 1.4x or 1.6x just in case, can improve the structure. Don't worry, it won't hurt a lot of the pattern you're trying to do here. It just makes it a little more clear.

This... "thing" is already good, meh such a small moddddxd
ok ily stingy
posted

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

35995

[- - Advanced - -]
  1. 00:17:115 (1,2,3,1) - Well, what's this purpose of this overlap under these three circles? I kinda don't feel right about it. The structure is well-made, but it doesn't seem pretty much of a distinct type for a flow like that. Fixed a little
  2. 00:22:111 (1) - Since the HP rate is quite a bit high, I think leaving a blank on a whole single track is probably not the best idea. It nearly drained almost a quarter of the HP on gameplay, but what if a little-newbie player is pretty low on that part? Maybe adding a few more notes, starting at this point, would be much obliged. Good aesthetics, but be careful with gameplay and its audience's view too! Lowered HP + Added Breaks

[- - Hard - -]
  1. 00:09:871 (1) - 00:13:868 (1) - Ehhmm, Why adding new combos here? Doesn't really fit for some kind of impact or whatso, and just before the downbeat too in my personal view. I guess laying them off by removing those extra new combos may be better to be honest. Dunno why I still have them there. Changed.
  2. 00:16:615 (3,4,5,1) - The distance spacing here is quite too random in placements, even in snapping them while dragging these circles anywhere. It doesn't seem to balance pretty well at all. I would recommend using a sufficient distance spacing, by around 1.4x or 1.6x just in case, can improve the structure. Don't worry, it won't hurt a lot of the pattern you're trying to do here. It just makes it a little more clear. Fixed, but left (1,2) at the NC a bit bigger for bell emphasis :3

This... "thing" is already good, meh such a small moddddxd
ok ily stingy
posted
o/
posted
[General]
  1. bg could be 1920x1200
  2. your custom finish lasts a pretty long time, shoulud probably cut it a bit shorter
  3. no combo colors?


[Normal]
  1. 00:05:125 (4,1) - wouldn't stack objects like this in a normal, just continue with your regular ds gaps
  2. 00:13:118 (3,1) - etc
  3. 00:32:603 (2,3,4) - space these out a bit more, their current positioning makes it ambigious as to what object to click first 00:04:126 (1,2,3) - same here
  4. 00:34:101 (1) - would prefer this closer to the previous sliders tail
  5. 00:34:600 (2,3,4) - space


[Advanced]
  1. 00:07:623 (5,1,2) - make consistent visual distance pls
  2. 00:16:116 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this is a pretty big diffspike


[Hard]
  1. 00:03:127 (4,5) - this is pretty hard to read at this difficulty level, wouldn't reccomend this. also it's a pretty huge jump so
  2. 00:05:250 - there's no sound here
  3. 00:09:122 (3,4,5,6,7) - ds here is pretty random
  4. 00:13:243 - overmap
  5. kiai is a pretty big diffspike too idk about all that


overall decent but the hard diff should be mapped more like a traditional hard imo. there's some really weird stuff in there. gl
posted

diraimur wrote:

GREETINGS MAPPER

mayb take uninherited timing point to 00:02:128 - so it works better with NC mod What? ;w;
00:03:127 (4) - x:120 y:168 It's literally at 119|167 but okay lmfao
tbh consider placing note at 00:18:114 -
00:22:111 - 00:26:108 - these are too loud imo Agreed. Lowered to 60%.
00:24:109 - could you curve these sliders a little less? imo curved sliders look better when they are less curved ye
00:30:104 - you can space after 1/4 sliders a little more because of slider leniency, its actually more awkward to play 1/4 sliders that are close to each other than the ones that are spaced more imo but that would require you doing this section entirely I complete redid this part before I read the mod lol
00:37:598 (7) - i would like a 1/1 slider here because of extended sound I agree somewhat, so I'll keep it for now
posted

Logic Agent wrote:

[General]
  1. bg could be 1920x1200 I'm aware, but I can't crop anything or resize it because I suck :/
  2. your custom finish lasts a pretty long time, shoulud probably cut it a bit shorter I haven't any software to do so
  3. no combo colors? Oops! >.> Fixed.


[Normal]
  1. 00:05:125 (4,1) - wouldn't stack objects like this in a normal, just continue with your regular ds gaps I think there is sufficient space. There is also consistency with stacks. Also, this can help teach newer players about stacks and how to read them- at an acceptable "beginner" level.
  2. 00:13:118 (3,1) - etc
  3. 00:32:603 (2,3,4) - space these out a bit more, their current positioning makes it ambigious as to what object to click first 00:04:126 (1,2,3) - same here I think it's fine, but I will see how others feel about it.
  4. 00:34:101 (1) - would prefer this closer to the previous sliders tail Alright
  5. 00:34:600 (2,3,4) - space


[Advanced]
  1. 00:07:623 (5,1,2) - make consistent visual distance pls hnngh okay
  2. 00:16:116 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this is a pretty big diffspike >.> I want to agree but I think it's okay.


[Hard]
  1. 00:03:127 (4,5) - this is pretty hard to read at this difficulty level, wouldn't reccomend this. also it's a pretty huge jump so Nah it's okay
  2. 00:05:250 - there's no sound here ??????????? there's a snare lmfao
  3. 00:09:122 (3,4,5,6,7) - ds here is pretty random okay
  4. 00:13:243 - overmap I don't understand how you don't hear the snare
  5. kiai is a pretty big diffspike too idk about all that


overall decent but the hard diff should be mapped more like a traditional hard imo. there's some really weird stuff in there. gl
posted
ehehehhe stingy asked me to.

also heres the video, its mute so it wont have problems in future mods and stuff

http://puu.sh/ul3Kw/8c133bbd56.mp4

also i put some stupid fade thing at the end cause it ends a bit later than your actual audio


OK MOD STARTS NWO:

normal

00:03:127 (3,4) - you should make 4 blanket 3
00:04:126 (1,2,3) - the placement of 2 triggers me for some reason
00:05:874 - it would be fine to have a circle here
00:09:122 (3) - this could be a 6/4 slider instead of a circle so it loops onto the next set
00:13:868 - you honestly need circles in these places, yeah its a normal but it makes it feel empty and unfinished (imo)
00:18:114 to 00:28:106 - you think anyone wants to spin this many friggin spinners
00:35:849 - atleast have a circle here since its about to end if youre gonna not have one in the other spots

eeee


Advanced

00:02:877 (3,4) - the way 4 is placed triggers my oc d.
00:20:612 - for the empty spots like this, you could place a repeating 1/1 slider
00:30:104 - wtf kiai part easier than non-kiai part
generally not many problems with this diff

Hard

00:33:601 (3,4) - are these in 1/6 im so confused wht

and crap i found like literally nothing wrong with hard

oh well i tried also uw with vid use it right click when u open up link to save
posted

xXRosalineXx wrote:

ehehehhe stingy asked me to.

also heres the video, its mute so it wont have problems in future mods and stuff

http://puu.sh/ul3Kw/8c133bbd56.mp4

also i put some stupid fade thing at the end cause it ends a bit later than your actual audio


OK MOD STARTS NWO:

normal

00:03:127 (3,4) - you should make 4 blanket 3 no thanks
00:04:126 (1,2,3) - the placement of 2 triggers me for some reason why ;w;
00:05:874 - it would be fine to have a circle here Maybe
00:09:122 (3) - this could be a 6/4 slider instead of a circle so it loops onto the next set I don't get it
00:13:868 - you honestly need circles in these places, yeah its a normal but it makes it feel empty and unfinished (imo) It's intentional lol
00:18:114 to 00:28:106 - you think anyone wants to spin this many friggin spinners hell yeah
00:35:849 - atleast have a circle here since its about to end if youre gonna not have one in the other spots it imitates the first kiai pattern

eeee


Advanced

00:02:877 (3,4) - the way 4 is placed triggers my oc d. wt f ho w
00:20:612 - for the empty spots like this, you could place a repeating 1/1 slider Perhaps :o
00:30:104 - wtf kiai part easier than non-kiai part The focus is on repeats
generally not many problems with this diff

Hard

00:33:601 (3,4) - are these in 1/6 im so confused wht hell yeah

and crap i found like literally nothing wrong with hard

oh well i tried also uw with vid use it right click when u open up link to save
posted
hi m4m

General

  1. What about some tags?
  2. Disable widescreen support, you don't have a storyboard
  3. Also the countdown, well, nobody use it anymore, it's up to you disable it
  4. Mmm, I think you can improve the combo colours don't you think? The defaults are kinda outplaced imo

Normal

  1. 00:02:128 (1) - Missing clap on slidertail. Same with 00:06:124 (1) - 00:10:121 (1) -
  2. 00:05:625 - You should emphatize this beat with a circle. Instead of leave a 2/3 space, leave 1/1. That would be better for newbies imo. Same with 00:13:618 -
  3. 00:09:122 - ^ Same, just that instead of a circle, add a 1/2 reverse slider, for cover 00:09:372 - and 00:09:621 - Same with 00:17:115 -
  4. 00:18:114 (1,1,1) - Why this spinners are existing in the lowest difficulty, when in the other ones are breaks instead? The newbie people will be more affected for the spinners, because (even if you don't think so) that's the hardest part of a low difficulty. Leave them as breaks please
  5. 00:21:112 (1,2) - Maybe 1/1 slider reverse instead? Of that way is consistent with 00:25:108 (1) -
  6. 00:33:102 (4) - Add whistle on sliderbody for consistency? Every 2 & 4 beat of the measure you did it so, imho it would fit well here too

Advanced

  1. 00:04:875 (3,4) - Honestly, I suggest to leave this as a 1/4 slider reverse, because 00:05:125 (4) - has more chances of being missed, and make the difficulty harder than it should.
  2. 00:18:114 (1) - Do you really think a good idea overlap this sliderart with 00:17:365 (2,3) - ? Idk, feels kinda forced
  3. 00:18:114 (1,1,1) - Really nice shapes <3

Hard

  1. Watch out with the DS on this diff. Some of them are jumps outplaced with no meaning like 00:05:375 (7,8) - 00:07:623 (7,1) - 00:08:622 (2,3) - 00:11:620 (6,7) - etc...
  2. 00:22:111 (5) - Move to x281 y108. That overlap it's really messy
  3. 00:35:100 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Ok, let's see. IMHO it would a lot better if: 00:35:600 (3,4) - change them to circles, and 00:36:599 (3,4) - & 00:37:098 (5,6) - make them just 1 1/4 reverse slider. More 1/4 sliders of that way are more chances of a combo breaker, specially for people who it's experimenting the Hard diff for the first time. 00:36:599 (3,4) - & 00:37:098 (5,6) - to 1 1/4 reverse slider because of the SV change that you make on those parts, that SV change make the sliders overlap more, and the chances of a combo breaker are higher.

I don't have so much to say, some things can be improved, but it's a really funny and neat mapset
Map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/553171
GL with rank
choo choo~
posted

CSLM wrote:

hi m4m

General

  1. What about some tags? I was gonna do that last, but I'll add some ^^
  2. Disable widescreen support, you don't have a storyboard ._. okay
  3. Also the countdown, well, nobody use it anymore, it's up to you disable it I like it :3
  4. Mmm, I think you can improve the combo colours don't you think? The defaults are kinda outplaced imo I thought I added some?

Normal

  1. 00:02:128 (1) - Missing clap on slidertail. Same with 00:06:124 (1) - 00:10:121 (1) - Oops >.>
  2. 00:05:625 - You should emphatize this beat with a circle. Instead of leave a 2/3 space, leave 1/1. That would be better for newbies imo. Same with 00:13:618 - Fixed somewhat
  3. 00:09:122 - ^ Same, just that instead of a circle, add a 1/2 reverse slider, for cover 00:09:372 - and 00:09:621 - Same with 00:17:115 -
  4. 00:18:114 (1,1,1) - Why this spinners are existing in the lowest difficulty, when in the other ones are breaks instead? The newbie people will be more affected for the spinners, because (even if you don't think so) that's the hardest part of a low difficulty. Leave them as breaks please
  5. 00:21:112 (1,2) - Maybe 1/1 slider reverse instead? Of that way is consistent with 00:25:108 (1) -
  6. 00:33:102 (4) - Add whistle on sliderbody for consistency? Every 2 & 4 beat of the measure you did it so, imho it would fit well here too

Advanced

  1. 00:04:875 (3,4) - Honestly, I suggest to leave this as a 1/4 slider reverse, because 00:05:125 (4) - has more chances of being missed, and make the difficulty harder than it should. Did something else
  2. 00:18:114 (1) - Do you really think a good idea overlap this sliderart with 00:17:365 (2,3) - ? Idk, feels kinda forced
  3. 00:18:114 (1,1,1) - Really nice shapes <3
    Remapped entire difficulty!

Hard

  1. Watch out with the DS on this diff. Some of them are jumps outplaced with no meaning like 00:05:375 (7,8) - 00:07:623 (7,1) - 00:08:622 (2,3) - 00:11:620 (6,7) - etc... This is emphasis ;w;
  2. 00:22:111 (5) - Move to x281 y108. That overlap it's really messy
  3. 00:35:100 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Ok, let's see. IMHO it would a lot better if: 00:35:600 (3,4) - change them to circles, and 00:36:599 (3,4) - & 00:37:098 (5,6) - make them just 1 1/4 reverse slider. More 1/4 sliders of that way are more chances of a combo breaker, specially for people who it's experimenting the Hard diff for the first time. 00:36:599 (3,4) - & 00:37:098 (5,6) - to 1 1/4 reverse slider because of the SV change that you make on those parts, that SV change make the sliders overlap more, and the chances of a combo breaker are higher. I think it's all okay because you don't need to FC a map on the first try. If there are some elements you can't read well, you can retry. With that being said, the difficulty must be legitimately readable. I don't mean that you can have all types of stacks and overlaps in an Easy difficulty and say "Just retry."

I don't have so much to say, some things can be improved, but it's a really funny and neat mapset
Map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/553171
GL with rank
choo choo~
posted
lol m4m for https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1230831 thanks

Ask me later to mod the Advanced/Normal. I want to see what you think about my concerns on the Hard first before I repeat myself too much.
[Hard]
Piggybacking on others' comments, you mapped the Hard in a slightly unconventional way. IMO you could rename this to an Insane with no further changes/very minimal changes to the first half and just make a new Hard diff. That sums up my thoughts on the Hard in general...

Rhythm stuffs

Rhythm is really inconsistent/random in the first half, imo it could use some structuring

For example compare
  1. 00:01:878 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - vs 00:09:871 (7,8,1,2,3,4,5) -

These rhythm choices are weird:
  1. 00:07:623 (7,1) - is actually a triple
  2. 00:08:622 (2,3,4,5) - is also actually a quintuple
  3. 00:14:617 (2,3) - is actually a triple
  4. 00:16:116 (1,2,3) - is actually a quintuple

But I think I know why you used those rhythms, it's probably to emphasise the strings right? Then why not remove
  1. 00:04:875 (3,4,5,6,7) - 5 and 7 are strong beats here but as a quint the 5 becomes weaker
  2. 00:12:869 (3,4,5,6,7) - 5 and 7 are strong beats here but as a quint the 5 becomes weaker

Finally there are a couple small points
  1. 00:05:375 (7) - slider end on strong beat
  2. 00:13:368 (7) - slider end on strong beat

And finally for the second half,
  1. The breaks could be removed and replaced with a slow slider like you've done in the Advanced, or you could map it to a spinner. I don't think there's a good reason to ignore mapping these sections and if so then I would remove the slow sliders in the Advanced too.
  2. 00:28:106 (1) - Don't like this spinner at all, I don't think the song changes enough to justify a complete change in gameplay element compared to 00:20:113 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:24:109 (1,2,3,4,5) -
  3. 00:34:600 (4) - should be a circle + gap if you're placing gaps 00:30:604 (3) - and 00:32:602 (3) - if not it seems really inconsistent.
  4. 00:31:103 (1,2,3,4) - These could be triplets+slider if you're going to use that pattern in 00:35:100 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -


Spacing/Flow

Not much to say here since it's well done
  1. 00:08:622 (2) - Unexpectedly small spacing and doesn't change direction. Compare 00:02:627 (2) - 00:04:625 (2) - 00:06:624 (2) -
  2. 00:17:615 (2) - Could be emphasised imo
  3. 00:14:118 (1,2,3,4) - The flow here isn't ideal comparing against the circular flow you had for basically everything else in the first half. The flow neither changes direction nor curves properly, so its motion is out of place in the first half, which basically exclusively uses circular flow and direction changes.


Visuals

Since the song is so short there's not much to say. Personally and in general, I don't like the cramped spacing like the one you use here 00:06:124 (1,2) -. I see that you use that spacing all the way though, so since you like it I'll actually suggest you keep it. I feel that in general, the map is lacking a theme and overarching structure, but there's nothing I can say about that since it's up to you to create structure. However, look out for consistency mistakes, for example:
  1. 00:09:621 (6,7) - The gap here either seems a bit large considering one type of spacing in the first half, compare 00:02:128 (1,2) - which as the first two notes sets the stage for the spacing throughout the first half, OR it seems a bit small considering the other, compare 00:03:626 (5,6) - which as the first strong beat spacing sets the stage too. Personal opinion is to make it larger.
  2. 00:32:103 (1,2,3) - should probably follow the angle used here 00:30:104 (1,2,3) -
  3. 00:30:854 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - You never use this 90 degree angling again, ever, in the entire map. Feels out of place.
posted
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.