Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

Camellia - Petals

posted
Total Posts
8
waefwerf
270 posts
Joined January 2014
Topic Starter
waefwerf
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 24. juni 2017 at 17:51:00

Artist: Camellia
Title: Petals
Tags: ななひら nanahira secretale confetto comiket 91 C91
BPM: 192
Filesize: 5593kb
Play Time: 05:23
Difficulties Available:
  1. Sadness (6,3 stars, 1181 notes)
Download: Camellia - Petals
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
This song KreyGasm
https://releska.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/petals/
wtb better diff name
Last edited by waefwerf , edited 16 times in total.
Spork Lover
722 posts
Joined October 2013
Spork Lover
irc, mentions a few things (Danish)
12:02 *waefwerf is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1201520 Camellia - Petals]
12:02 waefwerf: testplay pls? <3
12:02 Spork Lover: ok <3
12:02 waefwerf: not quite finished
12:03 Spork Lover: håber ikke du så mappet jeg spillede (;
12:03 Spork Lover: lol
12:03 waefwerf: did not
12:06 Spork Lover: 00:20:147 (1,1) - spacing og aesthetics er lidt ergh her
12:06 waefwerf: introen var lidt et rushjob tbh
12:06 waefwerf: skulle bare til de spændende dele :^)
12:06 Spork Lover: 01:18:272 (1,2,3) -
12:06 Spork Lover: eks dee spacing
12:06 waefwerf: haha
12:06 waefwerf: ved ikke hvad jeg tænkte der
12:07 Spork Lover: 01:35:147 (9,1) - switch NC
12:07 Spork Lover: 01:35:928 (1) - øh
12:07 Spork Lover: nc xd
12:07 Spork Lover: 01:39:990 (1,3) - switch NC
12:07 waefwerf: NC på kick sounds
12:07 waefwerf: prøver at markere at det samme repeater
12:08 Spork Lover: Jeg ville overveje hvor vidt downbeatet er det vigtigste sted så folk kan følge med xd
12:08 Spork Lover: 01:41:397 (1) - for du nc'er f.eks. downbeatet her
12:08 Spork Lover: hvor du ville have gjort det på 7 hvis det ikke var en slider
12:08 Spork Lover: (presumably)
12:09 Spork Lover: 01:49:990 (1,3) - de 4 nc's før den her var downbeat nc's
12:09 Spork Lover: osv osv
12:09 Spork Lover: lol
12:09 Spork Lover: flow er i øvrigt super nice btw
12:09 Spork Lover: det føltes super godt at spille
12:09 waefwerf: noice :D
12:10 Spork Lover: (dog ikke i begyndelsen, men det ved du godt xddd)
12:10 waefwerf: aja
12:10 waefwerf: hm
12:10 waefwerf: kunne aldrig rigtigt blive enig med mig selv om de der NC steder
12:10 waefwerf: fordi det er et repeat pattern der kører nogle gange hver gang
12:10 waefwerf: så vil gerne fremhæve det
12:10 Spork Lover: bare kør downbeat nc's
12:10 Spork Lover: det er nemmere
12:10 waefwerf: hvis jeg bare sætter en nobrain NC på hver measure bliver det mystisk
12:10 Spork Lover: og så emphasize dit kick med en kickslider eller noget i stedet
12:10 waefwerf: så forsvinder sammenhængen
12:11 Spork Lover: f.eks. på de triples hvor jeg sagde "switch nc" kan du lave dem til kickslider + single tap
12:11 waefwerf: og uden den bliver comboen obnoxiously lang
12:11 Spork Lover: så giver kicket stadig mening, og NC'en er på downbeat
12:11 waefwerf: hm
12:11 waefwerf: føler dog en normal triple passer bedre
12:11 Spork Lover: det er fair
12:12 Spork Lover: bare bliv enig med dig selv om hvordan du nc'er
12:12 Spork Lover: xd
12:12 waefwerf: det er ikke fordi 1. node e.g 01:36:240 (4) - er meget stærkere end den næste
12:12 waefwerf: ye
12:12 waefwerf: ^^
12:12 Spork Lover: 02:04:678 (5,6,7,8) - hmm
12:12 Spork Lover: et eller andet ved flowet her er lidt mystisk
12:12 Spork Lover: fordi du kører clockwise flow
12:12 Spork Lover: hele vejen bortset fra mellem 02:04:834 (6) -
12:12 Spork Lover: du skifter hurtigt "retning"
12:13 Spork Lover: hvis det giver mening
12:13 Spork Lover: lol
12:13 Spork Lover: 02:19:522 (1,2,1,2) - emphasis er forkert, er det med vilje?
12:13 Spork Lover: det er nemlig rigtigt ved02:18:897 (1,2) -
12:14 waefwerf: slider på kicksounds, cirklen markerer vokalen
12:14 waefwerf: spørgsmålet bliver så om det giver mening
12:14 waefwerf: gav det mening at spille?
12:14 Spork Lover: den sound der er på sliderend er meget stærkere
12:14 Spork Lover: hvis du vil gøre det sådan, så burde du også gøre det på den første
12:15 Spork Lover: 02:27:647 (1,2) - samme som02:26:397 (1,2) - ? giver en nice aesthetic
12:15 Spork Lover: xdd
12:15 waefwerf: har været helt væk da jeg lavede det though, tænkte tanken at det hele bare burde være cirkler
12:15 Spork Lover: 02:35:147 (17) - NC? xd
12:15 waefwerf: NC sure lol
12:17 waefwerf: argh, prøvede at fjerne de der fucked cirkler på 02:19:522 - etc og så lave slidersne til circles
12:17 waefwerf: det føles tomt uden de cirkler :(((
12:20 Spork Lover: 02:41:865 (2) - liiidt mere til venstre
12:20 Spork Lover: og så er det pattern lewd af
12:20 Spork Lover: bare like 5-6 pixels
12:20 Spork Lover: og dét er det
12:20 Spork Lover: xd
12:21 waefwerf: lul done
12:21 Spork Lover: i'm done
12:21 Spork Lover: den er sjov
12:21 Spork Lover: :3
12:21 waefwerf: <3
12:22 Spork Lover: #postforezkdplz
12:22 Spork Lover: ?!
12:22 Spork Lover: >//<
12:22 waefwerf: lul
12:22 waefwerf: sek
Nightsky
93 posts
Joined March 2015
Nightsky
From my modding queue (M4M)

Sadness

- 00:18:740 (2) - NC
- 00:29:522 (3) - Remove the reverse and place notes here so it maps the voice like you started doing 00:31:709 (1) here.
- 00:32:647 (1) - Remove NC
- 00:40:615 (1) - ^
- 00:42:647 (1) - ^
- 00:43:897 (1) - ^
- 00:45:147 (1) - ^
- 00:59:834 (1) - ^
- 01:01:397 (1) - ^
- 01:02:334 (2) - NC
- 01:02:647 (1) - Remove NC
- 01:32:881 (2,3) - Replace these notes with a 1/4 slider.
- 01:39:990 (11) - NC
- 01:40:146 (1) - Remove NC
- 01:43:272 (6,7) - Reduce the spacing between these two notes.
- 01:59:990 (10) - NC
- 02:00:147 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:00:615 (4) - NC
- 02:17:647 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:23:428 (1) - ^
- 02:23:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The sliders end way too close to the next note in the metronome, reduce them to be 3/4 sliders.
- 02:28:272 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:48:740 (9) - NC
- 02:48:897 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:49:365 (3) - NC
- 02:49:990 (7) - ^
- 02:50:147 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:50:772 (4) - NC
- 03:08:428 (3) - ^
- 03:09:053 (5) - ^
- 03:09:209 (1) - Remove NC
- 03:09:678 (2) - NC
- 03:10:928 (3) - ^
- 03:11:553 (5) - ^
- 03:13:428 (5) - ^
- 03:14:678 (12) - ^
- 03:15:928 (3) - ^
- 03:16:553 (5) - ^
- 03:16:553 (5,6) - Maybe reduce the spacing between these two. Optional.
- 03:17:959 - Place another slider like 03:18:897 (1) this one.
- 03:22:490 (2) - AI mod, object isn't snapped.
- 03:48:272 (4) - NC
- 03:53:272 (5) - ^
- 03:58:272 (4) - ^
- 04:23:897 (1) - This circle is hard to see, either put it a bit further away or delete it and extend the reverse slider by 1 tick.
- 04:36:240 (10) - Remove NC
- 04:36:397 (1) - NC
- 04:36:865 (3) - ^
- 04:58:272 (7) - ^
- 05:12:490 (3) - ^

Other than that nothing else I could find. Very nice map.
Good luck! :D
waefwerf
270 posts
Joined January 2014
Topic Starter
waefwerf

Nightsky wrote:

From my modding queue (M4M)

Sadness

- 00:18:740 (2) - NC no
- 00:29:522 (3) - Remove the reverse and place notes here so it maps the voice like you started doing 00:31:709 (1) here. Break makes a transition to following the vocals
- 00:32:647 (1) - Remove NC ok
- 00:40:615 (1) - ^ ok
- 00:42:647 (1) - ^ ok
- 00:43:897 (1) - ^ no, this maps the piano sound and thus is distinct
- 00:45:147 (1) - ^ ok
- 00:59:834 (1) - ^ no
- 01:01:397 (1) - ^ ok
- 01:02:334 (2) - NC ^
- 01:02:647 (1) - Remove NC ^
- 01:32:881 (2,3) - Replace these notes with a 1/4 slider. done
- 01:39:990 (11) - NC
- 01:40:146 (1) - Remove NC No to this, NC on the vocals and big white tick
- 01:43:272 (6,7) - Reduce the spacing between these two notes. Done
- 01:59:990 (10) - NC
- 02:00:147 (1) - Remove NC Same as before
- 02:00:615 (4) - NC no
- 02:17:647 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:23:428 (1) - ^ NC on 02:23:272 (1) - to distinguish that sound
- 02:23:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The sliders end way too close to the next note in the metronome, reduce them to be 3/4 sliders.Sure
- 02:28:272 (1) - Remove NC All non-changed NCs are refuted due to previously explained points
- 02:48:740 (9) - NC
- 02:48:897 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:49:365 (3) - NC
- 02:49:990 (7) - ^
- 02:50:147 (1) - Remove NC
- 02:50:772 (4) - NC
- 03:08:428 (3) - ^
- 03:09:053 (5) - ^
- 03:09:209 (1) - Remove NC
- 03:09:678 (2) - NC
- 03:10:928 (3) - ^
- 03:11:553 (5) - ^
- 03:13:428 (5) - ^
- 03:14:678 (12) - ^
- 03:15:928 (3) - ^
- 03:16:553 (5) - ^
- 03:16:553 (5,6) - Maybe reduce the spacing between these two. Optional. No, that would be inconsistent with the entire section
- 03:17:959 - Place another slider like 03:18:897 (1) this one. Feel like the break highlights the transition better
- 03:22:490 (2) - AI mod, object isn't snapped. Whoops
- 03:48:272 (4) - NC Done
- 03:53:272 (5) - ^ Done
- 03:58:272 (4) - ^ Done
- 04:23:897 (1) - This circle is hard to see, either put it a bit further away or delete it and extend the reverse slider by 1 tick. Fixed
- 04:36:240 (10) - Remove NC
- 04:36:397 (1) - NC
- 04:36:865 (3) - ^
- 04:58:272 (7) - ^ Done
- 05:12:490 (3) - ^

Other than that nothing else I could find. Very nice map.
Good luck! :D
Thanks for the mod :D
Will mod yours in a bit
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
SnowNiNo_
M4M
  • [Sadness]
  1. 01:04:990 (2,3) - 01:07:490 (2,3) - inconsistent spacing
  2. 01:12:178 (1,2,3,4) - keeping the flow with 01:11:709 (1,2) - would be better to play, and the flow is smoother
  3. 01:38:115 (5) - the overlap here is pretty confused, would cause misread in gamplay
  4. 01:53:740 (5,6) - ill make the spacing the same as 01:52:803 - since is an intense section, use a bigger spacing makes more sense then small spacing
  5. 02:08:584 (1) - 02:13:584 (1) - 02:46:084 (1) - 04:32:334 (1) - pretty unnecessary imo, since there isnt any specific sound to emphasis, and its pretty inconsistent
  6. 03:00:147 (1,2) - inconsistent spacing compare with 03:00:615 (3,4,5) -
  7. 03:02:647 (1) - make it at the center instead would be cleaner
  8. 03:07:647 (1,2) - 03:08:428 (3,4) - dont make the 1/2 gap the same spacing as 1/1 gap, its pretty bad structure since it confused player
  9. 03:10:147 (1,2) - 03:10:928 (3,4) - 03:15:147 - 03:15:928 - same here, this is even worse
  10. 03:13:897 (9) - NC
waefwerf
270 posts
Joined January 2014
Topic Starter
waefwerf

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

M4M
  • [Sadness]
  1. 01:04:990 (2,3) - 01:07:490 (2,3) - inconsistent spacing Fixed
  2. 01:12:178 (1,2,3,4) - keeping the flow with 01:11:709 (1,2) - would be better to play, and the flow is smoother Pattern follows melody of synth, intentional design
  3. 01:38:115 (5) - the overlap here is pretty confused, would cause misread in gamplay overlaps a different place now
  4. 01:53:740 (5,6) - ill make the spacing the same as 01:52:803 - since is an intense section, use a bigger spacing makes more sense then small spacing Increased spacing, but not by much since there's no drumkick on this triple
  5. 02:08:584 (1) - 02:13:584 (1) - 02:46:084 (1) - 04:32:334 (1) - pretty unnecessary imo, since there isnt any specific sound to emphasis, and its pretty inconsistent The latter two emphasize the bell sound. Second makes fine sense because of piano/synth/stuff and higher intensity. First I'll consider, but likely not change because of intense drums
  6. 03:00:147 (1,2) - inconsistent spacing compare with 03:00:615 (3,4,5) - Increased spacing by a bit
  7. 03:02:647 (1) - make it at the center instead would be cleaner Thought it already was that way lol. Fixed pattern.
  8. 03:07:647 (1,2) - 03:08:428 (3,4) - dont make the 1/2 gap the same spacing as 1/1 gap, its pretty bad structure since it confused player Remapped section, hopefully it's clearer now
  9. 03:10:147 (1,2) - 03:10:928 (3,4) - 03:15:147 - 03:15:928 - same here, this is even worse^
  10. 03:13:897 (9) - NC Sure, was struggling with where to put an NC while mapping :D
Thanks for the mod :)
faygo
283 posts
Joined November 2014
faygo
hello random mod

01:26:397 (1) Just a suggestion, maybe open a new pattern here instead at 01:28:272, same for the section from 04:16:397 (1)
02:20:928 (1,2) inconsistent spacing
03:09:053 (1) NC here would be better? Plus why that jump
03:20:147 (3) NC..?
04:42:490 (6,1,2) Weird flow

hope it helps :/ i can't find much errors to point out cuz im still noob and im trying to improve the quality of my mods
good luck!
waefwerf
270 posts
Joined January 2014
Topic Starter
waefwerf

Faygor wrote:

hello random mod

01:26:397 (1) Just a suggestion, maybe open a new pattern here instead at 01:28:272, same for the section from 04:16:397 (1) IMO it feels odd to change the pattern here, since the same drumbeat is still going. Will stick with current pattern
02:20:928 (1,2) inconsistent spacing Fixed
03:09:053 (1) NC here would be better? Plus why that jump Jump is because of strong clap sound in the music. Same with NC placement
03:20:147 (3) NC..? Done
04:42:490 (6,1,2) Weird flow That's pretty bad yeah, fixed

hope it helps :/ i can't find much errors to point out cuz im still noob and im trying to improve the quality of my mods
good luck!
Thank you for the mod! Feedback is always welcome even if there's not that much :)
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 8