1. 00:36:827 (2,3,4) - admittedly idk how to realize this without destroying the current pattern but the visual spacing here kinda contradicts the vocal emphasis you have going on with the sliders (and is also different from every other instance of slider-circle-slider in this part where the spacing goes along with the sliders' emphasis on vocals or sometimes guitar).
   
2. 01:08:261 (1,2,3,4) - Might give a better contrast to 01:11:570 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - if it was spaced a little in some way, just some overlapping back and forth or something for visual distinction, since obviously the former is way more intense.
   
3. 01:17:305 - with how much the drum pattern stands out here, map this somehow? At least personally it's the main rhythm I focused on when hearing this, and the slider at 01:17:195 (4) - doesn't seem to be emphasizing any particular sound that gets held over that note (since the guitar changes pitch on the white tick).

1. 01:48:849 (4,5) - These don't feel great imo with 01:49:070 - having both a strong vocal and stronger percussion than 01:49:290 -, having some other clicking rhythm might be nicer.

Waku wrote:

general

-should add "dashyy-" and "imbor" to tags since they gded
-01:32:526 - you could have higher volume here considering it's probably the strongest drum in the song, 85% or 90% would work good.

extra

-you have two points at 00:07:378 - with different volumes, i suggest you turn it into 70% considering the intensity of the part ok
-00:07:378 - why didn't you just make this x0.25sv like you did at 00:14:437 - pretty unneeded greenline at 00:07:709 - there is no difference
-nothing is playing at 00:55:687 (1,2,3) - but you have it be the same spacing as spots like 00:18:629 (1,2,3,4) - , even 00:57:452 (2,3,4) - seems stronger than it, i suggest you lower the spacing for it distinct sound has its own type of spacing. it's larger than all the percussion linear spaced 1/2


bor extra

-01:38:923 - skipping this doesn't seem right, you're skipping the vocals on the sliderend and you could also add a 1/2 slider or 3/4 slider at 01:38:923 - to emphasize 01:39:143 -
-why did you stack 01:01:202 (1,2) - and 01:43:555 (1,2) - differently even though they are the exact same, i suggest you change one of them to look like the other
-01:51:055 (2,3) - was this meant to not be stacked on 01:50:393 (4) - it's pretty noticeable in gameplay imo so i suggest you fix that
-01:57:452 (4,1) - incorrect stack, it should look more like 01:57:121 (2,3) - if that was what you were going for

insane

-you stacked 00:42:231 (2) - onto 00:41:790 (1) - when there was a 1/1 gap, but for the rest of the map you only stack 1/2, i suggest you not stack this considering this is the only one in the entire map dont think mixing stacks on a diff lke this is too confusing or anything. song has a pause of sorts so a stop of movement felt appropriate

hard

-i suggest in some way you show that 00:59:658 (5,6,7) - are all different. you mapped them as if they were the same, but they arent. you can hear that 00:59:658 (5) - has constant 1/4 playing, 00:59:879 (6) - has just 1/2 beats, and 01:00:099 (7) - also has 1/2, but has a carry type of sound on
01:00:099 - . you could make 00:59:658 (5) - a quad 1/4 repeat and have 00:59:879 (6,7) - just be two 1/2 circles and 01:00:099 (7) - as the 1/2 slider that you mapped. same thing at 01:42:011 (5,6,7) - did

dash advanced

-00:58:555 (1) - shouldn't be nced, it's still part of 00:56:790 (1,2) - i suggest you nc 00:59:658 (3) - instead
-00:19:290 (5,6) - is this sort of jump intentional? it's kinda of obvious you aren't following ds for that
-00:30:099 (5,1) - what's with this jump? their isn't anything strong playing at 00:30:540 (1) - , so i suggest you don't add that
-if the jumps were intentional, i would take them out since then it would make the spread from normal to advanced too difficult tbh

LwL wrote:

hi from q

Extra

1. 00:36:827 (2,3,4) - admittedly idk how to realize this without destroying the current pattern but the visual spacing here kinda contradicts the vocal emphasis you have going on with the sliders (and is also different from every other instance of slider-circle-slider in this part where the spacing goes along with the sliders' emphasis on vocals or sometimes guitar). same. stacked the circle so it's like 00:36:165 (3,4) - , maybe that won't feel as weird spacingwise
   
2. 01:08:261 (1,2,3,4) - Might give a better contrast to 01:11:570 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - if it was spaced a little in some way, just some overlapping back and forth or something for visual distinction, since obviously the former is way more intense.made it 2 stacks
   
3. 01:17:305 - with how much the drum pattern stands out here, map this somehow? At least personally it's the main rhythm I focused on when hearing this, and the slider at 01:17:195 (4) - doesn't seem to be emphasizing any particular sound that gets held over that note (since the guitar changes pitch on the white tick).3/4 sliders afterwards dont feel as cool if density is too high right before i think

Insane

1. 01:48:849 (4,5) - These don't feel great imo with 01:49:070 - having both a strong vocal and stronger percussion than 01:49:290 -, having some other clicking rhythm might be nicer. whole section ignores offbeat vocals, so maintaining percussion stuff seems better

cool mappu

dsco wrote:

pretty sure it should be 136bpm not 272bpm. could get a second opinion on this but makes more sense to me, tabs and sheet music online say the same though not official. changed

[normal]
i think it'd be more apt to call this "beginner" or "easy" or something, its got real sparse rhythms and a real low SV. most normals would have ~0.8 SV for 270bpm (or like 1.6 for 130) idk too much 1/2 for an easy i think + 1/4 in dash's normal would make things even more weird
00:28:776 (2,3) - i could see this causing misread for new players since 3 starts becoming visible around the same time as the second repeat arrow, which will also be under a 300/100/50/miss hitburst. don't think its a good idea + it's only one like it changed
01:17:967 (1,2) - i think it best to destack these like 01:21:496 (1,2) -. probably not too big a deal but new players like to hit things as soon as they can if they are unsure of the reading changed
01:35:614 (1) - fix snap changed

[dash's advanced]
kinda awkward that 01:14:989 (2,4) - you only use active 1/2 once in the whole map. i'd change something elsewhere to have active 1/2 too so its pretty clear cut difficulty-wise
00:18:959 (4,5,6) - nitpicky but this shape kinda looks sloppy
00:33:408 (3,4) - could be neater
00:39:474 (2,4) - awkwardly close slider bodies
00:51:276 (4,5) - this gap is pretty awkward rhythmically. if 4 was a reverse slider with the same length the rhythm would fit much better, would require some re-patterning though
01:11:239 (2) - move this like 8px down so it looks nice
01:15:761 (5) - having such a strong sound on the tail isn't great imo
01:25:687 (3) - tail is litearlly like 1px offscreen, just move it a tiny bit to be safe

[hard]
00:35:614 (1,2,3,4) - could definitely see this being confusing for new players. i'd just do 0.2x spacing for 1/4 or something for visual clarity, especially with patterns like 01:17:084 (1,2) - later [img=https://i.imgur.com/BCtbBcU.png]like this[/img] (00:37:930 (2,3) - etc.., though i think the triples are telegraphed enough for hard level players) changed
rly good diff aside from that being problematic

[insane]
00:50:504 (3) - is this mapped to something? yes
00:55:687 (4) - feels kinda weird to me that you use a kickslider here but circles for stray drum hits like 00:52:268 (3,2) - standout shape was the thing that makes this special and cant do that with circles
01:08:040 (1,2) - what happened to this concept: 00:22:379 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - ?
01:25:687 (1,2,1,2,3) - ^ same and everywhere else in the sectioninstruments are gone. first one doesnt have bass drums and second doesnt have guitar, so theyre calmer
01:15:099 (1) - this shape feels pretty out of place compared to the rest of the map in a way i dont think is that great, maybe its just the first segment not having a super cohesive angle compared to the rest of the pattern's shapes changed first angle
01:33:849 (1,2,3) - feels weird that the drums are all so passively mapped and this bit uses so little space, especially compared to the first chorus changed
01:38:040 (5) - same as first kiai, i feel its better as circles

[bor's extra]
00:07:378 (1,2,3,4) - feel its better to have this centered on 00:06:496 (1,2,3,4) - or full stacked, rather than only half stacked. its weird to have 2,4 overlapping and 1,2 not visually (if you dont then 00:06:717 (2,2) - fix stack)
00:21:496 (1) - should probably at least 25% slider end since there is an audible sound on the red tick for all of these patterns(you have a green line there so maybe you meant to but its 80% volume? there's like a billion duplicated green lines in the diff overall, would look at how you meant to hitsound this if its supposed to be different)
00:33:849 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - feel like this could be done a little better, maybe less rotation each time, and/or rotating around the center instead
00:35:614 (3,6) - 00:36:827 (2,3) - kinda ugly overlap amount, either full commit or overlap a lil less so the circle isn't touching so much of the slider body. 00:38:261 (1,3) - and 00:35:173 (5,2) - are better
00:41:570 (4,5,1) - extremely awkward flow in comparison to everything previous in the map. this movement is so straining to play accurately compared to the last 10s of flow
00:45:981 (5) - why suddenly 3/4 in this section? makes 00:21:496 (1) - 00:25:026 (1) - less powerful/unique, and you don't use this for any other vocals in this section?
00:49:511 (5,6,1) - 5 is the same sound as 6,1 in the drums so i think it should stack too.
01:08:040 (5) - can you make this 0.75x (think it was intended, you do it earlier). kinda nitpicky but the circles are so touching
01:08:923 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - overly challenging reading when reading difficulty is basically not present elsewhere in the map
01:16:202 (1,3,1) - 01:24:584 (1,3,1) - inconsistent shape / spacing between 1,3 // 3,1 in each makes this look sloppier than necessary. (especially 01:29:879 (1,3,1) - here it looks pretty gross)
01:28:334 (6) - think its better as 1/2 for same reason as 00:45:981 (5) -
01:32:526 (3,4) - think rhythm ctrl+g is better. i realize ur trying to make each snare clickable, but then the two floor tom notes (on tail of 4, and 5) are mapped differently from eachother. you use slider in similar situation here, 01:37:820 (3) - .
02:01:202 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - would be nice to have some back n forths to close the map / call back to previous patterns

[extra]
00:19:290 (1,2,3,4,1) - don't know how spicy ur feeling but ctrl+g 2,3 would be pretty sick. would introduce 1/2 being snappy earlier, too changed
00:35:614 - this whole section feels overspaced in comparison to the kiais / especially the outro to me. its SO much harder and jumpier than anything else in the map. either nerf it a lil or buff the outro and maybe some other bits n pieces changed
00:42:231 (1,2,3,4) - destack a lil? fits more visually i think, since you use stacks a lot for 1/1 and destacks a lot for 1/2 changed
01:15:981 (4,1) - not rly a fan of introducing 3/4 over a minute into the map buttt not a big deal i suppose section so lame without 3/4
not much to say for individual patterns

call me maybe