pyrowar56 wrote:

Chata!! owo

Easy:
01:25:474 - add note here? then nc 01:26:508 (2) - tried another
02:05:301 - i think spinner should end here sound obviously ends there
01:50:818 (4,1) - maybe blanket here tried
01:22:370 (3,5) - ^ another intention..

Normal:
01:16:163 (1) - it looks better if you flip vertically :3 fixed

Hard:
01:06:724 - add note hard rhythm..
01:54:956 (5,6) - dont stack tried another one
01:59:094 (2) - maybe nc like insane? yeah

Insane:
01:15:905 - 1/6? mapped other beats instead, 1/6 is too heavy for this mapset
01:24:439 (2,1,1) - hard to hear these ;;pattern based on sound
01:58:836 - i think it should be clickable more impact on next triplet
01:42:413 (3) - nc? ehh hard to read maybe

thats all! cute map :3/

Narcissu wrote:

R18 Chino

Lami wrote:

m4m

easy

01:26:508 (1,2) - ds real

normal

00:44:612 (4,5) - ds ?

hard

00:34:525 (4,1) - 00:50:818 (4,1) - 01:07:887 (1) - 그렇네요 다 고쳤습니다
뭐 보편적이고 랭크시키기 깔끔한 하드는 걍 ds고정해버리고 합니다만은..
개인적으론 인센에서는 강한비트마다 매우 큰 스크린점프급으로 넓게 표현했음에도 불구하고
하드는 거의 같은 ds로 쭉 놓아서 약간 아쉬움이 드네요. 중간중간에 점프 조금씩 보이긴한데 좀더 있는게 좋달까
그냥 플레이어시점의 의견이에요. 같은 ds로만 계속가는것보단 점프 좀만 더 넣는게 좋지않을까..


insane

00:17:974 (4) - 걍 x0.9나 x1 ㄱ...? 아직 분위기 좀 덜뜬거같은데 그래서 그런가 이거 3연타 간격에 비해서 너무 길어보여여 리얼 1.05
00:43:836 (4,5) - 이 점프가 칠만한 점프인건 알겠는데요..
그래도 이건 분위기랑 주변 다른점프에 비해서 시각적으로 너무 커보여요 사각형을 이루는 패턴도 있고, 별로 큰거같지도 않은데다, 다른 부분에서 같은 용례로 사용한 바가 있고, 보컬상의 근거도 있어서 킵
01:51:077 (1,2,3) - nazi..ds :< 01:53:146 (1,2,3) - too tru
01:57:284 (1,2) - 피니시 점프라는건 알겠는데 키아이라지만 노래 슬슬 작아지는 부분이라 그런지
이것도 너무 커보이는데..이건 분명한 강조가 들어간 부분이라.. 킵할게요

ok im 99% sure bg is chino, bye

Log Off Now wrote:

chata :d

m4m from my q

[Easy]

00:49:267 (3,4) - i'm not sure if you're following the vocal here or the xylophone (since both match), but if you wanted to match the xylophone a bit better (i think it would be nice to break it up a little bit), then two 1/1 sliders would fit really well here oh yeah
01:00:646 (2,5) - the slider circle in (5) overlaps the slider border of 01:00:646 (2) - in game, move it a little bit lower to fixhmm maybe ok
01:14:094 (3,4) - same suggestion as 00:49:267 (3,4) - although I think it's even more fitting here because there are no vocals to follow wanna make difference of rhythm use than before
01:24:439 (5) - maybe nc this? since this is a large gap and a combo burst would be useful to easy players hp drain wise yeah and normal too
01:26:508 (1,2) - there is a ds error here (2, is too far away from 1) rip
01:32:715 (3) - maybe have the anchor point around where the slider tick is? just gives a bit of extra visual/movement emphasis vocal

nice

[Normal]

01:06:853 (4,5) - maybe swap these around on the timeline? since the vocal swap actually finishes on the whitetick, there is less emphasis on the red tick the slider end currently finishes on in comparison to the next white tick where there is a big snare (like you did here 01:25:474 (4,5) - ) fixed to another rhythm

nice

[Hard]

00:30:387 (5) - missing whistle hitsound? you hitsound the two previous ones which match the violins but miss out the third one yeah
00:43:448 (2,3) - any reason why you map this triple and then don't for the rest of this section? it feels a bit random since you only do it once more here 00:59:999 (2,3) - much later and thats a bit of a stretch to call it consistent when the triples in the music is a constant featurethat's true lol
01:42:542 (4) - i think this would work better if the red tick was clickable to match the bass kick/vocal true

nice


[Insane]

01:48:232 (4) - holy f this spacing is a bit sudden xd, idk what i would change it to, but this is super suprising and unexpected, not sure if its intentional same pattern before and following vocal, so ok maybe?

nice

[]

very nice set, gl

KuranteMelodii wrote:

LOL much better than my version tbh

Lami wrote:

m4m

down

흠 개인적으로 cs5는 눈에 안들어와 어케 모딩해야될진 잘 모르겠는데
여튼 01:04:266 (1) - 스냅점요 헉 fixed

ok im 99% sure bg is chino, bye

Log Off Now wrote:

chata :d

m4m from my q

[Down's Insane]

00:50:301 (1,2,3) - i would prefer it if this was kept consistent with 00:49:267 (1,1) - since it's a really nice idea! and currently feels a little overmapped But it sounds too loud to ignore it 00:50:431 .
01:02:456 (4) - i think the spacing can be reduced here a little since it's less powerful than the vocal note before it It's already blanketed, so it's hard to fix it.
01:04:783 (1,2,3) - same as 00:50:301 (1,2,3) - (and other times it happens) Same as above.
01:29:353 (2) - move this a little bit to the left for a perfect triangle 01:28:577 (1) - I made a triangle with the tail of this slider, the circle 3, and the tail of the slider 2. It seemed a bit awkward and I bent the slider 2 a little.
01:42:025 (1,2) - alternatively, if you don't want to change 00:50:301 (1,2,3) - / 01:04:783 (1,2,3) - then i think you should make this one consistent with the previous 3 01:42:155 - But this place does not sound different from the front part.
01:59:094 (2) - again this is inconsistent with the rest of the map, i would prefer it if you made it into a 1/2 slider then circle like previous, it would also be a more satisfying ending imo nice

nice


very nice set, gl

joker- wrote:

Hi Left~ no kds
quick mod

Down's Insane

1. 01:04:266 (1) - unsnapped Fixed!

i love this song <3 shoot my kds star~
Good Luck with you!

• 
  1.05ds LOL

1. 00:45:129 (3) - rip symmetry
2. I think you can try http://puu.sh/tRoku/4be471a74f.jpg it 01:49:267 (3,4,1) - here, because aesthetics will be better

1. Why lower DS than easy? lol
2. 00:16:163 (4) - You should place nc here, because you've here strong downbeat and it should emphasise music better. The same 01:59:612 (3) - here.

1. perfecto

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

from your m4m queue
my map here: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/531385

Easy and Normal looks nice for me

Hard
00:22:370 (1) - imo a blanket would make it look better not intended
00:33:749 (3) - blanket can be improved yeah
00:59:612 (1) - ^ok fixed

Insane
01:15:905 (9,10,11) - this part didnt fit the song quite well as here is a 1/12 from 01:15:991 - to 01:15:991 - so i think a 1/6 slider would be better

good luck xd

Realazy wrote:

m4m from queue

[General]

consider rearranging some of your stacks by enabling stacks in editor, some of them look bad and some even hide elements (see Hard)

hitsounds in easy/normal

your hitsounding at the start feels kinda random, why not use a whistle every 2nd downbeat?

actually overall I think you could use a lot more whistles, they fit the song much better than some of your clap patterns imo and even if you do keep the claps, you could always add the whistles

not really a fan of your normal-hitclap, sounds a bit too aggressive/out of place for this song but i see you can do pretty good things with it especially in the higher diffs

01:42:025 - you could end the kiai here and start it again at 01:43:060 -

you should add the fading volume lines in all diffs instead of insane only

[Easy]

why did you not use your custom normal whistle here?

00:32:715 (1,2) - swap NC? 2 is a completely different part of the song while 1 is fairly similar to the previous part my mistake
01:32:715 (3) - how about moving the red point like this so the slider path changes right at the white tick? that's nice fixed

[Normal]

i kinda disagree with some of your rhythms used here, you seem to prioritize less important beats because i suck at normal x( have to improve it

00:07:887 (1,2,3) - why is this pattern different from the rest of the intro? true, fixed
00:12:025 (4) - this should have a NC for consistency yeah
00:22:370 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - again, why is this a different rhythm different sound?
00:37:629 (5) - you could extend this slider to the next tick, same as 00:54:181 (5) - now is ok i think
00:46:163 (7) - move this note to the next tick instead now is ok i think
01:02:715 (6) - this... doesn't start on anything? ..?

[Hard]

00:21:336 (3) - i think it would sound nice if you could split this slider into 2 circles and stack the second one on 4, keeping your hitsounds obviously pattern so hard
00:34:525 (4) - this stacking hides the circle behind the sliderok maybe?
00:59:353 (4,1) - i don't usually mention those but please fix this blanket lol true
01:57:543 (1) - would've liked a more special shape than a plain circle tbhif i got idea

good

[Insane]

00:03:232 (4) - stack it on 1's bump like this?
00:16:163 (2) - this spacing feels kinda rough hmm no problem?
01:24:827 (1,1) - are those notes really necessary? the sounds you're following are very quietyeah for this map

your diffs keep getting better as they get harder lmao, the hitsounding was much better here as well



good luck!

Neoskylove wrote:

포럼피엠 안받는뎁. ㅠㅠ 지송..

[Insane]
00:06:853 (3,4) - 제 생각에는 00:07:241 - 를 표현해주시면 좋을것 같아요. 클리커블 노트라던가.. 전반부 난이도를 너무 올리는거같아 슬라슬라로 처리했습니다
00:09:181 - 노트 하나 추가해보시는건 어떨까요? 개인적으로 뭔가 허전한 느낌이 들었습니다. 마찬가지 음도 안들리구
00:10:474 (2,4) - 오버랩 보기에는 조금 어색해 보입니다. 전체적으로 오버랩 패턴이 보이지 않는지라. 두겠습니다
00:22:370 (5,1) - 뉴콤보 스왑하는게 더 나을것 같습니다 패턴끼리의 뉴콤이라 그닥 무리도 없어보이고, 팔로우포인트 생겨서 보기도 별로일거같아요
00:19:267 (3) - 조금 어색해 보이네요. 슬라이더 모양. 억지로 스택한것 같습니다.그냥 부드럽게 만들어주세요. 00:27:543 (3) - 마찬가지 음...제 패턴
00:22:629 (1,2) - 거리가 조금 멀어서 리딩이 조금 어려울 것 같습니다. 00:21:594 (1,2,3,4,5) - 얘에 비해 너무 크게 차이 나네요.끝까지 끄는 무빙을 유도하지도 않고, 시각적인 간격은 안정적이기 때문에 실제 해보시면 문제 없을겁니다
00:35:560 (4,6) - 그냥 스택. 00:35:301 (3,4) - 얘 거리도 좀 줄이는 겸에 하는게 좋을것 같네요. 다음 슬라와의 동선이 살짝 불안정해지네요
00:47:198 (1,2,3,4) - 단순한 스택 때문에 전반적으로 거리가 줄어든 감이 있네요. 어색해보이는데 스택 안하고 사각형 모양 패턴 만들어 보는건 어떨까요? 01:03:749 (1,2,3,4) - 얘처럼 걔와는 보컬과 심벌들의 강도가 달라서 일부러 차이를 줬습니다
01:07:887 (1,2) - 여기보다는 01:08:663 (5) - 여기가 보컬이 있어서 더 강조되어야 할것 같습니다. 애초에 보컬이 낮기 때문에 강조할 의도는 없었고, 노래상에서 트리플렛까지 긴장도가 이어지기 때문에 거리를 줄이지 않고 보컬 전까지 이었습니다. 오히려 보컬이 낮기 때문에 줄인거라고 볼수 잇겠네요
01:09:827 - 노트추가. 비트가 있는것 같습니다 여기 잔비트가 애매해서 고민중이긴 한데, 의견 더들어보고 결정할게요
01:15:905 (9,10,11) - 박자가 잘못된것 같습니다. 01:15:991 - 01:16:077 - 여기에 음이 있는거 더 맞는것 같네요. ㄹㅇ
01:18:620 (2,3) - 다른 1/4박에 비해서 너무 크게 떨어져 있습니다. 굳이 앞 노트에 스택할 필요는 없을것 같습니다/. 패턴상으로 용인될수 있다고 생각해서 놓았는데, 크게 무리라면 고치겠습니다
01:25:474 (1,2) - 큰트롤지 하는게 개인적으로 흐름이 더 좋아 보입니다/ 두번째 서클 - 트리플렛의 동선이 너무 수평이 되서 불안해지네요
01:27:801 (6,7,8) - 조금 애매한 위치에 놓여 있는것 같습니다. 그냥 깔끔하게 1번 머리나 꼬리에 스택하는게 좋아보이네요. 사실 에디터상으로는 동의하는 부분이지만, 실제 플레이하면 오히려 간격논리가 더 느껴져서 자연스러울거라 생각합니다
01:31:163 (2,3) - 개인적으로 이상한 패턴 흐름이라고 느껴집니다. 01:31:422 (3,4) - 갑자기 2배로 뛰어버린 DS가 조금 리딩이 어색해 질 수도 있는것 같습니다. 맵 핵심패턴이므로 패스
01:42:413 (3,4) - 1/4 치고는 얘도 너무 떨어져 있습니다. 01:41:767 - 여기 노트에 4번을 스택하는게 좋아보입니다. Zweib의 Baby Fantastic 최고난이도같은 용법이라 보시면 될듯
01:55:474 (3,5) - 오버랩 피하는게 좀 더 보기 좋을듯합니다. 이거 제가 맨날쓰는 패턴인데..ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
01:59:612 (4) - 뉴콤보 패턴끼리 묶
01:59:094 (1) - 필요한 뉴콤보는 아닐것 같네요.^

끝

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

from your m4m queue
my map here: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/531385

Down's Insane
01:15:258 - here is no voice so i think 01:15:258 (2) - may change into a 1/4 slider? However, the sound of the guitar sounds stronger than I thought.

good luck xd

Realazy wrote:

m4m from queue

[Down's Insane]

01:12:543 (1) - NC feels out of place I think so too. Fixed!

good luck!

Neoskylove wrote:

포럼피엠 안받는뎁.

[Down's Insane]
00:05:689 - 보컬비트 추가
00:10:862 - ^
00:12:931 - ^ 위 3개 의견처럼 보컬비트가 있긴 합니다만, 음악의 앞부분이라 다 표현하기는 힘들것같네요.
00:18:232 (1) - 앞에 3번 노트를 볼때 조금 어려운 흐름 같습니다. 음.. 어려운지는 잘 모르겠네요. 하지만 음이 강해서 괜찮을거같아요.
00:23:017 - 단순히 슬라이더 꼬리로만 끝내기에는 조금 아쉬운 음 같네요ㅕ. 제가 듣기엔 꽤 강한 음 같은데 ?! 아무음도 없늗..
00:30:646 (1,2) - 00:32:715 (1,2) - 여기 두개는 반스택하신 이유가 뭐죠. 다른곳이랑 똑같이 띄워주시는게 더 좋을것 같아요. 맵을 전체적으로 보시면 3/4슬라이더 뒤에 단노트는 반스택을 시켰습니다. 1/2슬라뒤에 나오는 2연타슬라이더(?) 같은 경우에는 띄워서 만들었구요
00:35:818 (3,4,5) - 어떤 비트를 따라간건지 잘 모르겠습니다. 드럼에서도 이런 음은 잘 안들리는것 같은데. 이것은 드럼보다 기타음을 들어보시면 확인하실 수 있습니다.
00:39:956 (3,4,5) - ^^
01:12:543 (1) - 필요한 뉴콤보는 아니네요. Fixed.
01:21:853 (5) - 조금 이상해 보이는 흐름이네요. 4번이랑 맞대어 볼때. 앞의 슬라이더와 같이 보시면 블랭킷이 있습니다.
01:24:439 (1,2) - 플레이어가 과연 이걸 1/2로 읽을 수 있을지 모르겠습니다. 01:24:181 (5,6,1) - 얘네 거리랑 똑같아 보이네요. 확실히 그렇네요. 좀 띄우겠습니다.

끝

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello M4M

Down's Insane

1. 00:05:301 (5,1,2) - fix blanket Fixed.
2. 01:38:922 (1,2) - ^ Fixed.
3. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - at the earlier occasion this looked fine, but here it's pretty much unnecessary gameplay-wise and not too good-looking visual-wise I do not know if this is strange. ;w;
4. 01:48:232 (3,4,5) - these patterns you had had mostly the first circle pretty much stacked with the slider. Now that this doesn't have it, it would look better if the latter slider was similarly placed compared to the slider as the first, so it's kinda symmetrical I wanted to give this pattern a moving feel.

Good luck!

HelloSCV wrote:

아형식가져오기도 귀찮네 100만골드에 팔려왔습니다

01:08:405 (4,5,6) - 노트3연타 이후에는 웬만해선 점프를 주셨는데 여기도 점프 넣으시는게 좋아보여요 갑자기 줄어드니 좀 어색하네요 음, 앞까지 강한 분위기여서 스페이싱 이어주다 줄였는데 좀더 고려해볼게요
01:24:181 (1,2) - 앞에껀 뉴콤보빼고 뒤에꺼에 뉴콤보 넣는건 어떨까요? 뒤에 3/4박자패턴이 좀 더 쉽게 강조될거같아요 fix
01:42:413 (3,4) - 개인적인 생각이지만 좀 뭐랄까 과한?느낌인거같은데 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7267975 이런식으로 해보시는건 어떨까요? 01:47:715 (2,3,4) - 이것도 바꾸시면 좋겟지만 지금도 나쁘지않으니 둘다 바꾸시거나 둘다 그대로 두시는게 좋을거같아요 갓매퍼님께서 그렇게 말씀하시니 고쳤습니다 후자는 킵할게요 컨셉이라

전체적으로 히트사운드 음량이 좀 작은느낌인데 특히 노말 샘플셋같은경우엔 거의 들리지 않는수준인거같아요, 제가 귀찮아서 이어폰끼고 안들어보긴했는데 전체적으로 음량을 좀 더 올리시거나 샘플셋을 교체하시는것도 고려해볼만한 것같아요. 나중에 뱃들이 굳이 언급하면 고치는수준? 전반적인 음량 올렸습니다.

그리고 전체적으로 휘슬을 많이넣으셨는데 좀 과한부분은 빼고 필요한부분은 넣는식으로 수정해주시면 좋을거같아요 이건 다운님이 말씀해드릴거임 이거 잘 모르겠

쿠도스 주지마세요

1. 01:01:681 (3,4,5) - You can stack 01:00:646 (2,5) - by moving 01:01:681 (3) - to 63|144, 01:02:198 (4) - to 129|210 and 01:02:715 (5) - to 215|170

1. 00:01:681 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:05:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i guess you unstacked on second part as for higher vocals but yee keeping consistency still would be great here since it's low diff
2. 01:39:698 (2,3) - this is the only one I saw unstacked circle + 1/1 slider on entire kiai, maybe stack them as well?

1. 00:14:870 (2) - I personally would change this slidershape to the simple one for just a calm section
   
   a

   
2. 00:34:784 (1) - 00:36:853 (1) - sTaCk

1. 00:31:681 (3,4) - idk this may awkward for playing when 00:32:456 (6) - is circle imo, maybe remove reverse on 00:31:681 (3) - and add another 1/4 slider on 00:31:939 - ??
2. 00:51:336 (1,2,3) - 135| 168 for visual thingy?

1. 01:15:905 (4) - at least 1/4 kick would deliver better for some bells on music imo
2. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - linear triples? since 01:46:681 (5) - is in the bottom and there's nothing rounded flow from that note so yee maybe move 01:47:068 (7) - to 388 | 126

Sotarks wrote:

hello m4m

down's insane
00:49:784 (2,3) - no need to nc those man I put it because of the slider shift.
01:04:266 (1,1) - like^ same but anyway feel free to keep it it's not a big deal imo Same reason as above.

01:07:112 (6,7) - point out that the spacing here is increadibly huge compared to the other 1/4 spacing you use... how about reducing it? It was a little reduced.

01:21:336 (4,5) - how about making those straight slider, 'cause the movment will be more smooth that your actual pattern going reverse you slider flow.. Slider (5) is blanketed and is symmetrical with slider (4).

01:26:508 (1,2,5,6) - check your 1/4 spacing consistence pls Fixed thx xd

01:40:215 (5,6,7) - rythmn here is ... like you skip that clap not so good aa umm.. idk ;w;

gl!

Akitoshi wrote:

Down's Insane

1. 01:15:905 (4) - at least 1/4 kick would deliver better for some bells on music imo It's a good idea, but it's hard to make a pattern.
2. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - linear triples? since 01:46:681 (5) - is in the bottom and there's nothing rounded flow from that note so yee maybe move 01:47:068 (7) - to 388 | 126 oh nice!

mapset is good enough so i cant point that much lo

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506291 only highest diff cuz fullver and my mod sucks

Sonnyc wrote:

Down.
cs5에 대한 이유를 좀 듣고 싶은데 비록 기준 간격이 가까운 편이어서 작은 서클 크기가 어울릴만하긴 하지만 전반적으로 맵 내에 굵은 점프들이 꽤 있는편이어서 5까지 설정하는 것은 조금 무리가 있지 않았나 싶네요.

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello,
i'm a bit late, sorry about it...

[General]
1st part of song is sound too quiet , mb You can up volume a bit 40->50. And it's kind a underhitsounded. i expected whitles spam. 00:02:198 -
00:03:232 - etc. ok
01:57:543 - stop kiai here , because more hyped moment is ended imo rip i don't want to

[Easy]
Why did You not use whhistles here? I mean why did u make 01:54:439 - normal hit like here? it souds more like soft-whistles... It really noticeable in sliders like 01:49:267 (3) - it feels like zero hitsounded.
maybe You can add some new Hs for it. Something a bit quieter than your current soft whistle. -> planning HS rework
01:50:818 (4,1) - blanket a bit off fixed already lol

rest is fine

[Normal]
00:01:681 (1,2) - hmm, it's 0,9 ds and Ai mod thinks "no one even care" . Honestly, i have no idea about inconsistent spacing because of stacks... is it legit? Who cares it's normal.
00:16:163 (4) - not a big deal, but it strongly enough for NC, and it's end of section and it's a new green line ... like 01:24:439 (1) - ok
00:34:784 (7,1) - swap NC pattern NC
00:57:543 - remove NC lol my mistake
01:00:387 (2) - ctrl-f like here 00:43:060 (1,2,3) - for more consistent rhythm my pattern..
01:40:991 (1) - is NC here really needed? actually needed but I'll off it cuz normal
01:58:060 - 01:58:577 - i suggest to map 2 this beat. You are missing 2 pretty strong beats and start of vocal (01:58:318 - ),after these space hard for player to catch what You wanted to map. (what idea of this?) no reason to cuz map for noobs
01:58:318 - 01:58:577 - map 2 these points will work as well. ^

[Hard]
00:14:094 (1,3) - You can blanket it with same idea like 00:01:681 (1,3) - it's more neat. my pattern..
00:21:336 (3) - why You whistle tail but not head???? there is no sense... like hs weak souds and silence strong for making them equal?(because these sounds equal right now) thats like idk... Even You want to keep it, make whistles clikable, these are too strong. HS will be reworked
00:29:612 (3) - ^
00:33:749 (3,4) - You know, stack works for making objects visible, your slider disagree with it now. i think it's not that unreadable
00:44:353 (3,4) - unstack, stop flow here really unnececary imo. 01:00:387 (2) - You can use same idea like here. It sounds more appropriate. Anyway making sme sounded section with the same rythm does not harm anyone . actually I thought stack also can show it properly, and easier one is better here i think
01:03:491 (5,3) - stack, its like 2 pixel off now xD i tried but I can't find unstack..
01:15:129 - sthis strong beat should be clickable imo smthing like http://puu.sh/tSoaS.jpg will work well. Or 01:15:387 - at least stack this one with sliderend. mapped that symbol, so reverse is more suitable i thought
01:31:681 (3) - 01:48:232 (3) - will be cool if these was ~similar spacing rip my ability
01:52:887 (5,5) - ^

[Insane]
00:10:474 (2,3,4,2,3,4,5) - any reason to change rhytm? i mean repeat sounds really cool here... no sound in first one
00:21:336 (5,1,2,3) - same thing as hard
00:22:629 (1,3) - too spaced imo. They are on weak beats. Especially 00:22:629 (1) - , 00:22:370 (5) - especially(x2) after down beat. visual distance, movement is surely ok here
00:30:646 (5,1) - ^ sound gives, so ok
00:21:594 (1) - okay You NC strong sound, and pettern should be beter readable now, 00:22:370 (5,1) - but why here? pattern NC
00:30:646 (5,1) - ^ ^
00:40:732 (8,1) - this down beat with smaller ds then jumps, i thinks it could be spaced more. don't have to
00:44:870 (7,1) - ^ vocal low so lowered DS
00:41:767 (4,5,6,7) - 1.2 00:37:629 (4,5,6,7) - 1.7 ??? 00:37:370 (3,5,6,7) - stack end of triple with 3 ->ds 1.2 no reason to. sound is different
i firstly thougt You just make patterns with regression principle but here 00:58:836 (5,6,7) - You did 2,2 !!! My brain broken...
00:54:181 (4) - cntrl-g flows a bit better circular flow is better
00:58:318 (4,5,6,7,8) - if You made this as hyped moment with big ds i can't undrstend 01:14:094 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why here is small-spaced pattern? why i have to compare to that one ;w;
01:08:663 (5,6) - space it more , it looks like 1/4 who thinks???? maybe can be 1/4 if it's priti map
01:42:413 - slider will make flow much more comfortable, everyone hates doubles... doubles with big spacing - just nightmare.
song gave, so
Spacing looks a bit inconsistent 00:34:784 - 01:25:215 - there again why?


[]
That's it.
Goodluck. O/

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello M4M

Easy

1. 01:50:818 (4,1) - fix blanketyeah

Normal

1. Not like it's really wrong currently, but what's your logic in changing between 00:01:681 (1,2,3) - and 00:05:818 (1,2,3) - these 2 kind of spacings you've done for these patterns herevocal is super high, so didn't stack.
2. 00:34:784 (7) - I think this should be the NC instead of 00:35:301 (1) - since it's on white tick and is clearly more important sound. (you are prob going for similar comboing as at 00:24:439 (4,5,6) - for example, but thats different since there the NC is clearly on the important sound that is also at white tick) grouped according to pattern and sound,
3. 00:37:629 (5,6) - this feels random, would imo work better if 00:37:629 (5) - was 1/2 longer mapped where vocal sound should be emphasized, can't map all because note train is too long
4. 00:54:181 (5,6) - same as above
5. 01:00:387 (2,3) - similar case, but here it would work better if you had circle at 01:00:387 - and then these 2 sliders
6. 01:09:956 (4) - perhaps NC this? same with 01:18:232 (4) - You can just not NC them too, it's not like it doesn't work the current way too catually unnecessary
7. 01:29:353 (5,6) - same as at 01:00:387 (2,3)
8. 01:33:491 (5,6) - here on the other hand this patterning feels better since it fits the music better. Still, thinking of how you tap this, it would fit better if same as above
9. 01:36:853 (5) - NC? unnecessary..
10. 01:45:905 (5,6) - here we go once again. For this I would just add circle at 01:46:422 - or smth
11. 01:50:043 (5,6) - lol atleast it's consistent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
12. 01:53:405 (5) - NC here as well? unnecessary
13. 01:57:543 - why not make the important sound here clickable? Perhaps map it simlarly to pattern like this 00:33:749 (5,6,7) - yea fixed

Hard

1. 00:22:370 (1,2,3) - this blanket doesn't look too good due the strong curve of slider 1 or atleast the distance is too high for that curve, lowering the curve is easy fix. It will also smoothen the line between 00:21:853 (4,1) - which will further increase it's visual appeal ah so many issued, just made it to red tick slider ;w;
2. 01:57:543 (1,1,2,3) - similar thing here. Also arrange the stack 01:59:094 (1,2,3) - so that circle 1 is the one blanketing instead of circle 3, since that way it looks correct. You can't really see circle 3 blanketing the slider due it's place rhythmically, but you can clearly see when, like at the moment, circle 1 is not doing it cuz stacking pushes it out of the wayalso just changed pattern ;w;

Insane

1. 00:15:905 (1) - It's cool the way it is too, but I think it would work better if you snapped it with 00:15:128 (4) - only, so that it as if continues it. That way it also flows slightly smoother as the motion is shifting downwards (where 00:16:163 (2) - goes) instead of going back to previous place, where 00:14:870 (2,3,4) - is i couldn't find why now shouldnt so keep
2. 00:21:594 (1) - is this NC made to indicate the string sounds or smth? Otherwise just NC 00:21:336 (5) - instead pattern NC
3. 00:22:370 (5) - NC instead of 00:22:629 (1) - strong sound on white tick lol. Looks like you are consistent with these as well (like those sliders somewhere above lol) so instead of me linkin em all here, if you change one, change em all pattern NC
4. 01:24:439 (2) - NC this the similar way 01:24:827 (1,1) - are both NC, this is also on a white tick. Could just NC 01:23:405 (6) - as well and then remove the NC from 01:24:181 (1) - that way it feels more logical imo will keep it, but consider it cuz you're right
5. 01:42:025 (2,3,4) - you sure bout this? Compared to the previous ones it looks clearly like a 1/2. Granted you are increasing the intensity with slider velocity, but there's no way to except this random huge spacing mapped according to cursor 's speed, it would be much natural.

Good luck!

Sotarks wrote:

hello m4m

easy
00:17:715 - you could probably add a circle here, too follow drum snare ? not necesary in Easy

00:20:301 (3) - maybe a rythmn like this can be appropriate ? just suggestion, if you agree do it 00:28:577 (3) - here aswell.. to make easy easier, and vocal
pretty good easy, good to go.
[]
normal
00:16:163 (4) - you can prob add a nc here to emphasis the downbeat yea

00:34:525 (6,7) - can you maybe replace this with a 1/2 slider to avoid this dense rythmn here ? white tick sound too strong

00:57:543 (1) - remove nc for consistency my NC was wrong, so fixed another one

01:09:698 - you are following vocals but here you skip that important sound pls tru

01:17:974 - ^ aaa
good to go aswell, just a bit worried about the vocals not mapped but shouldn't be a big dead! yea
[]
hard
00:16:163 (1) - maybe try to avoid this overlap dude, it's really not a big deal to change it for the readability of the map! avoided

00:47:198 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - my concern about this patern is 00:47:198 (1,2,3,4) - ok this one follow correctly the vocals, but 00:49:267 (1,2,3,4) - this one doesn't i can suggest you a rythmn like this would be more appropriate tbh. symbol sound was too strong, i felt i shld map it
nice hard here!!
[]
insane
01:23:405 (6) - nc for readability? yea

01:24:439 (1,1,1) - oh please replace that by a reverse slider, it's just so unconfortable to play! not fun tho

01:42:025 (2,3) - hoyl shit spacing!!!1 sorrrrrry...
cool diff
[]

gl!

Akitoshi wrote:

Easy

1. 01:01:681 (3,4,5) - You can stack 01:00:646 (2,5) - by moving 01:01:681 (3) - to 63|144, 01:02:198 (4) - to 129|210 and 01:02:715 (5) - to 215|170 that's nice

Normal

1. 00:01:681 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:05:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i guess you unstacked on second part as for higher vocals but yee keeping consistency still would be great here since it's low diff vocal high so unstack
2. 01:39:698 (2,3) - this is the only one I saw unstacked circle + 1/1 slider on entire kiai, maybe stack them as well? ok ill fix it

Hard

1. 00:14:870 (2) - I personally would change this slidershape to the simple one for just a calm section
   
   a

   i like my one
2. 00:34:784 (1) - 00:36:853 (1) - sTaCk ah uuuu

Insane

1. 00:31:681 (3,4) - idk this may awkward for playing when 00:32:456 (6) - is circle imo, maybe remove reverse on 00:31:681 (3) - and add another 1/4 slider now one is better to show rhythm of song on 00:31:939 - ??
2. 00:51:336 (1,2,3) - 135| 168 for visual thingy?fixed

mapset is good enough so i cant point that much lo

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506291 only highest diff cuz fullver and my mod sucks

Venix wrote:

shitty mod

Easy.

• 
  1.05ds LOL

1. 00:45:129 (3) - rip symmetry yea improved
2. I think you can try http://puu.sh/tRoku/4be471a74f.jpg it 01:49:267 (3,4,1) - here, because aesthetics will be better linear movement, now is better i think

Normal

1. Why lower DS than easy? lol no problem if actual spacing is bigger
2. 00:16:163 (4) - You should place nc here, because you've here strong downbeat and it should emphasise music better. The same 01:59:612 (3) - here.kk

Hard

1. perfecto

Xexxar wrote:

lets get this shit going

[insone]
01:15:889 (9) - dis some questionable snapping fam... the real rhythm is 1/4/th with a 1/8th on 01:16:083 - o triplet
01:24:423 (1,2,3) - i really like this xDxD
01:49:251 (1) - this stood out as weird to me, sort of breaks for intensity but doesnt really fit, tbh control g and readjust...fixed

rest are fine easy / normal / hard

偽チノとエッチなことをしたい：＾＾＾＾）

Xexxar wrote:

[Downs]
01:16:018 - u could put a note here T BH Fixed with triple.
01:27:527 (4,5,6) - i dont get this rhythm (i understand u do it alot and u dont have to change it, its just Booty and im trigerd) Well, I do not know if this rhythm is awkward, but it's hard to explain. Xdddd
uncheck widescreen support u cuck ok


偽チノとエッチなことをしたい：＾＾＾＾）