Aeril wrote:

1. 01:30:770 (1,2,1,2) - i think these should be reduced a bit, feels a bit unwarranted for two random jumps in the section to be this huge compared to the rest and the stream afterwards
2. 02:33:270 (1,2,1,2) - yea same, just feels a bit too big
3. 03:43:113 - i just find it funny here that the echoing voice doesnt fade out it just stops // lol
4. 04:04:520 (2,1) - 04:09:520 (1,2) - find it triggering that one is stacked while the other isnt // doesn't matter too much i think
5. 04:20:770 (1,2,3,4) - usually you emphasize these 2 jumps? any reason why you dont here // i considered it but i honestly just wanted to do a different pattern than its previous iterations
6. 04:22:879 (2,3) - might just be me but this seems a bit easy to misread as a triple because of the stacking, maybe move it off a bit
7. 05:02:801 (2,3,4) - move down a bit, slightly touches the hp bar

Stingy wrote:

00:30:145 (1,2) - Have these parallel? // eh i like it this way
01:08:113 (2,1) - Stack?
01:45:770 (2,3) - Stack?
nvm this is too hard and your style is much too different from mine ^^;

handsome muscle wrote:

Cool! Randomly passing by. Need mod?
Here I come.

00:18:973 skip the synth rhythm.Compare to 00:19:910 (5,6,7) - why are they different?
00:27:645 (1,1) - blanket. btw why the interval is 1/2? The other intervel here are almost 1/4 // i just find it nice lol
00:49:520 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - lol same space seriously?
01:07:645 (1,2) - blanket // its as close as i can make it
01:41:082 (2,1) - Try to avoid the overlap. It is just not beautiful.
01:58:582 (7) - I know you follow vocal here. But this one just...idk,maybe the drum hit is too strong. This one give really weird feedback to me. The other undermap stuff are fine,except this one.sth like this02:08:582 (4,5) - is much more better for me.
02:37:332 (1) - Cool. But I think 1/8 reversed slider here fit the music better.just like this 04:23:582 (1) -
04:41:707 (3,1) - Blanket
05:22:645 (1) - Oh why the sv suddenly enhanced? Fuck that sliderbreak. // so i can make a decent star shape. lowered sv a bit

This is a great map so I got no more to point out. Hope this rank soon!

newton- wrote:

hi, from queue
not good at modding technical stuff but here goes

[ blossom]

1. 00:31:707 (1,2,3,1) - could be pentagon instead since 5 note phrase // wanted to make 1/1 distance distinct
2. 01:22:332 (2) - ctrl+g for flow? // prefer to keep like this
3. 01:30:145 (1,2,3,4) - increase spacing to give the feeling of acceleration since you did that with the last 2 combos // i wanted speed to waver a bit here, since it transitions to a low sv
4. 02:01:863 (2,1) - an overlap like this would look better i think // think i'll keep it like this, your version's slanted a bit too much for me
5. 02:13:582 (1,2,1,2,1) - this is the only stream of its kind in the entire map, change it since it stands out too much
6. 02:32:645 (1,2,3,4) - refer to 01:30:145 (1,2,3,4) - // same
7. 03:45:145 (4,5,6) - how about rhythm like this to make downbeat clickable? (same goes for 03:55:145 (4,5,6) - ofc) // i wonder why i bothered to make this exact same rhythm 3 times
8. 03:51:395 - make downbeat clickable too
9. 05:17:645 (2) - forgot nc? you have an nc every slider for this section except this one // i do this at 00:10:145 (1,2) - and 00:20:145 (1,2) -

amazing map, have a fav!
pls rank/love this

Sotarks wrote:

omg how do you even want me to mod this >< it's unmoddable
well ok here we go !
[Blossom]
01:39:754 (2,3,4) - unstacking those could really be easier to read tbh! // think its fine to read rn
01:46:707 (3) - nc is not needed here
01:47:488 (3) - i miss readed this to 3/4 !! maybe put it x392 y48, would make nice flow! // i like current one more, your suggestion feels too spaced out imo
01:53:426 (2) - x301 y209? would be nice
02:53:426 (1) - remove nc so you don't have this 02:53:816 (3,1) - weird nc transition here xd
02:57:645 (6) - nc?
03:22:332 (1,2,3) - hey u don't wanna do smth like this ? if you agree fix the next ones ! could be really nice for the emphasis on 03:22:645 (3) - ! // nah, i dont want angled jumps here
03:58:895 (3) - try this rythmn instead to follow correctly vocals. // eh i want to keep it somewhat simple
04:35:613 (4,3) - stack
04:42:254 (2,3) - try this ?
[]
increadible map!!!
gl
*have a star*

lit120 wrote:

[blossom]

1. 00:27:645 (1,1) - this looks off // i tried
2. 05:22:645 (2) - is it just me or the star shape isn't rly parallel from both sides? // pretty sure its parallel

dude, this deserves 4 stars xd

hi-mei wrote:

hello
from my queue:
00:12:645 - i think here shud be starting another slider, and 00:10:145 (1) - shud be ending here 00:12:020 - consequently cuz 00:12:645 - is a start of new sound phrase which is held by slider end for now... this will also solve this 00:13:895 (2) - slider from being too short for slow calm part
and also use doing what i suggested above 00:15:770 (1,2,1) - here for example, i think this is how it supposed to be // i acknowledge the slider rhythm you want me to map, but i'd rather keep my own
00:57:332 (3) - i think it shud be a bit further from (2) due to emphasis logic. 0.03 gain isnt that tangible... cuz 3 is way stronger than 1 or 2 here
01:05:613 (2) - maybe make this shape a bit more rounded by using circle? http://puu.sh/vcf1t/5e30b1916d.jpg // its fine
01:08:113 (2,1) - same http://puu.sh/vcf2Y/35a6b24224.jpg // ^
01:10:926 (1) - not quite sure why u put a slider here, maybe making a slider from 01:10:770 - for vocals and ignoring 01:10:926 - would fit better // i follow the rest of that little synth up until the spinner, i think its fine as a transition in focus
01:45:613 (1,2) - shud be parallel maybe
01:58:270 (4,5,6) - and 01:58:582 (7,8,1) - triplets shud have the same distance inbetween them? // fixed 1st one, 2nd one is b/c of change in sv
02:29:207 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - i dont think that ds increment shud be that high
from 1.3 to 2.3 to 3.5 in a one sound phrase that doesnt have much intensity // its pretty easy to play
02:34:988 (3) - hmm not sure if this shud be a reverse slider, it feels like 02:35:066 - 02:35:145 - shud be clickable
02:38:426 (2,2) - make it like this maybe http://puu.sh/vcfjZ/2b022f484d.jpg
so overlap wont look that harsh // ?

02:54:988 (3,1) - ^ change stuff for a bit, looks ugly for me // its fine
02:57:645 (6) - lol nc?
03:11:238 (3) - shud be nc here as u did 03:09:832 (1) - ?
03:40:223 - break here? i mean, theres no reason to leave this without break, guidelines in RC are telling us // purely for thematic effect, and hp drain doesnt go down

03:51:395 - not quite sure why u did a slider end here, its a start of new vocal line tho // that measure is one whole vocal line
04:23:895 (1,1) - not quite sure if this place is readable tho ._. maybe change the curved slider // no ones had problems with this when testplaying
04:37:332 (4,3) - stack slider ends to avoid harsh overlap ;w;

overall i can say this map is really good, i like it!

Battle wrote:

[General]
Think transparency can be cut down a bit for fog circle dot and highlight pngs
OD is kinda low considering AR but w/e
metadata in description doesn't have feat. nanahira in picture, do you have a source that says feat nanahira?

aaaand can you get someone Japanese to confirm lyrics lol

[Diff]
01:05:613 (2) - this curve looks pretty gross imo // its w/e
01:17:020 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe make this slightly less touching, imo it would help since you already introduced pretty close circles so it would help people recognize this is 1/2 instead of 1/4
01:46:395 (1,2,3,4) - idk, this feels pretty overdone, the music isn't really doing a whole lot special here but the way this pattern plays it put a lot of emphasis on nothing
02:03:270 (1,2,3) - I'm just gonna point this out once cuz there'll probably be more but I'm just tryna make sure this is a stylistic choice and not an error lol // stylistic choice
02:55:926 (1,2,3) - Kinda like the other one, this kinda feels like there's a lot of stress to the music when there isn't too much there, I'm more surprised by this cuz the vocals were pretty intense then the part afterward is more intense than the vocals z
04:27:801 (2,3,4) - mmm 4 gets the same kind of emphasis even though 2,3 have significant beats and that bugs me
04:46:551 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - This pattern is kinda going against your hitsounding since it's kinda just going along by itself while the more important beats are kinda just ignored, more notably 3 which gets really low spacing despite being a kick

probs be back, maybe when I feel less tired lol

cute bg btw

Naotoshi wrote:

hi

[petals]
00:15:770 (1,2) - meh doing this sort of thing kinda messes up the constant cursor motion cuz you gotta stop on the slider end and wait for the next circle. imo spacing them would maintain the motion instead // spacing them would feel a bit forced considering this slider is relatively slow
00:48:895 (2,2) - stack these?
01:22:020 (1,2) - having these both as 1/2 sliders feels weird to me cuz 01:22:332 (2,1) - are clearly paired together and 01:22:020 (1) - is not
01:32:645 (1,2) - this makes kind weird finger polarity or w/e can you make it 2 circles?
01:34:988 (4) - overmapped fullscreen jump ok_hand
01:35:301 (2,3,4) - this is the only time you do this kinda thing, maybe hard to read? all other times the circles don't overlap the slider
01:34:988 (4,2,3) - considering these, wouldn't it make sense to place a kickslider at 01:38:582 (1) - instead? // the music suggests the stream imo
overall i don't really like how you switch between circle and sliders for the kicks in this section, seems as though the clicking rhythm is kinda disconnected from the hitsounding.
another example: 01:46:395 (1,2,3,4) - where 3 has a kick and should imo be differentiated from the other 3 sliders but isn't at all
this issue appears to me in all of the kiais, in various places.

02:05:301 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - i don't see why you repeated this pattern when the song isn't repeating >.>
02:19:363 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this measure seems weirdly dense in rhythm compared to previous ones. // thats intentional
02:51:238 (1,1) - pretty sure this is the only time you highlight the kicks like this. why here and nowhere else? // because there's nothing else going on in the rhythm at that time
03:43:113 - break here?
04:27:957 (3,4) - another thing i kinda don't like... song seems to be emphasizing 3 the most (as with your hitsounds) but in the end 4 has emphasis instead
04:46:551 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - here, same thing with the repetition not really existing in the song // idk, it's interesting to me

i'm not really a fan of the constant 1/4 rhythm, it makes the map feel kind of overdone to me. good luck!

Lavender wrote:

i wanna drop some opinions before this map is bubbled

1. 01:37:645 (1) - slidertail follows a kick and sliderhead follows literally no(or a very weak) sound, that plays really weird.
   patterns like this are more suitable imo (but rip patterns)
   e.g. 02:51:238 (1,2) -
2. 01:56:395 - i think you need a clickable object here // i kinda like this pattern, and slider ending on downbeat is repeated in other areas
3. 02:56:238 (3,1,2,3) - rhythm here could be improved. 02:56:395 (1) - sliderhead follows no(or a very weak) sound // downbeat's always p strong
   Try this
4. 04:32:332 (2) - same // whistle

Good Luck!