Wishkey wrote:

yow!

1. 00:00:472 (1) - just -18offset so its on the blue, not that noticable atm but with hitsounds stuff like 00:24:490 (1) - on the stream you can hear a slight delay compared to 472 offset Fixed
2. 00:09:370 - toughts about stopping the spinner here? cymbals get intenser here a bit so could end it on that and still enough reaction time with ar10 Nah, it makes it too long imo
3. 00:19:690 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - feels underspaced to me compared to how you did it at 00:17:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - for similar sounds and for some distinction between 00:20:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I'd space it out a bit more This isn't tremming with the pick. It's a rided out sound, so I don't think it needs anymore than given.
4. 00:23:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - sounds more like the same intensity as 00:24:958 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - so bit weird to go with copying ds of 00:24:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - for the latter 00:24:956 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - only lasts for 8 notes and not 19, so it can be a bit bigger. Also, having two crammed spaces at the end of a spaced stream would be cancer imo.
5. 00:29:410 (2,3,1) - plays really linear with the leniency, doesnt really emphasis the chnage on 00:29:770 (1) - that well imo unlike you did for the previous similar pattern, maybe something like this so you have to do some snapping for those stronger notes? but you'll prob find something better Origonally had it like this, don't remember why I changed it
   
6. 00:37:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - not really hearing anything that warrants such a huge ds decrease compared to prev stream, drum kinda remains the same for me starting from 00:36:970 (1) - and the guitar thing gets only a little intenser here I wanted to emphasize 00:38:396 (1) - the most I could
7. 00:42:010 (1,2) - and similar, yeah you can hear this is off atm 00:42:250 - should be clickable since thats whehere the drum rythm changes, something like 3 circles into a return works here No because 00:42:356 (2) - starts on a 2/4 tick and not a ?/3 one, so it would flow into the 1/4 akwardly. I also wouldn't want to emphasize this sound more because it's the same one for the rest of the notes
8. 00:44:890 (1) - 00:52:570 (1) - and similar single note into return, no need to NC these, main musical stuff starts on 00:52:330 (1) - and having a follow point here for the denser rythm can't hurt either makes it easier to read to quiet parts The NC's are heavy here because it's slower. In the map, streams have long combo's while the note patterns and "jumps" have very short ones. This is to help emphasize the 1/2 more saying there is almost NONE of it in this map.
9. 00:43:690 (1) - 00:51:370 (2) - kinda inconsisent NCing here, personally I'd have NC'd 00:42:730 (1,1,1,1,1) - in 11212 for a different NC for the different rythm gaps but just make sure its consistent in your way 00:42:716 (1,2,1,1) - I NC'd 00:44:156 (1) - because it was breaking away from the 5/1 gap into a 2/1 gap. 00:44:636 (1) - Is NC'd because it's part of a new rhythm
10. 00:56:383 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - beginning of the section section, altough not wrong atm since its all mapped to the drum, I feel like you could take the main instrument in this like you do later on I just noticed, 12 being really weak is kinda offputting atm since the main instrument starts back at 3 and this is the one people will prob follow since after a while the constant drum will fade to the back since you get used to it rather quick, could make 00:56:383 (5,1,2) - a reverse so its like mirrored version of 01:01:783 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - where you put the main follow on the reverses, or just 12 into a slider works aswell so you a have a shift when the main instrument comes back I mapped it the way I did to keep it more interesting and not the same thing over and over. Why I alternated with kicksliders and reverse ones.
11. 00:59:383 (7,8,9,10,11) - 01:08:983 (7,8,9,10,11) - any reason why these changes on these are ignored? feels a bit out of place, I'd map the changes here so stuff like 01:13:408 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - stands out more It is emphasized, just not as much because it doesn't have the drums to back it. The motion of the pen is changed to the opposite swooping motion which isn't as promonent as say a shart turn, but it does the job.
12. 01:42:463 - would let the break begin earlier here, now I was kinda waiting for a note instead of a break since it started that late I wanted it to start when the guitar did. Makes the impact orgasmic. Also, there's no problem with waiting for a second or two longer, your HP isn't going to go down.
13. 01:55:183 (2,3) - make a stream instead? 01:54:943 (1,2,3) - vs 01:55:663 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - is kinda connected in the music like repeated, current rythm doesnt really represent that Nah, 01:55:889 (1) - is the end of the bit and is the start of a lyrical break.
14. 01:57:823 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - gets a bit intenser here compared to the previous streams, could do something with the spacing here if you want to represent that I think it's fine how it is
15. 02:06:463 (9) - NC k
16. 02:07:903 (1,1,1) - kinda like mentioned earlier, the way this is NC'd makes it hard to predict 02:08:623 (1) - for first time listeners, follow point would be better They can predict it with implied motion of the pattern prior ( 02:06:449 (1,1,2,3,1,2) - ). Also, I believe that every stream should start NC'd. Makes it look better, and helps keep the streams and patterns seperate.
17. 02:22:063 (1,1) - 02:24:943 (1,1) - would remove NC's easier to notice the pattern (was a bit of guess work even with relax lol) Get better at reading
18. 02:28:543 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - and similar not that sure about these being 1/3, 02:28:543 (1,2,3) - sounds like it but 02:28:783 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - sounds a lot faster and the 6 1/3s sounds off with the music that has more 'pauses' in it, would double check this 02:28:783 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) sounds 1/4 ish with like trip/1/4 pause 02:28:769 (1,2,3,1) - is 1/4, but the rest is 1/3. I might change it, but for now this plays better and sounds better on full speed
19. 02:30:463 (1,2,3,4) - should be spaced like 02:31:183 (1,2,3,4) - really powerfull drum and guitar that comes back at this place, the small spacing doesnt do it justice imo, and 02:29:983 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 02:30:703 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - since there same intensity, current combos feels a bit random spaced now atm No because 02:30:689 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - is mapped to the guitar getting higher, so it wouldn't make sense. Also, the slowing down helps emphasize the large drum hits for an orgasmic effect.
20. 02:33:343 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - would be better if these were circles so you have a rythm change on 02:34:303 (1,2,3,1) - since you can hear the first one is a lot more intenser, would place sliders at 02:32:383 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - if you want it not 1/2 spammed since it'd fit better for these since the guitar only has a strong beat on the whites This was done because I didn't want too much singletapping taken from this part of the map because of teh intense streams before. Also, the note you wanted me to turn into sliders would be a bad idea imo because the guitar is going up in pitch, so I increase the spacing. It would be akward and out of place if I incresed the SV to creat the same effect.
21. 02:38:143 (3,1,2,1,2) - kinda feels disconnect atm since its all 3 the same sound in the music, also rythm is kinda bad here repitiition like earlier works better with the song like 02:38:383 (1,2,1,2) - first 2 guitars are clickable, next 2 only 1 guitar is clickable while the song is in repeat here. So yeah better pattern diversity instead of rythm diversity Changed it up a bit
22. 02:47:743 (1,2,1,2) - minor but maybe change a 12 a bit, being completely identical while the song drops that much is a bit well simple, could spice things up a bit It's fine imo
23. 03:01:183 (1,2,3,4) - could use more emphasis, I think you used different spacing for stuff similar like this earlier in the map It's the same as the same sound before
24. 03:05:503 (4,5) - antijumps come a bit out of nowhere since you used repition for all the similar ones, this plays a lot harder then any similar ones it kinda feels out of place to me 03:05:489 (4,5) - are very unimportant sounds, so I wanted to keep them as small as possible
25. 03:08:863 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - weird rythm choice here, 03:09:583 (1) - this slider would make a lot more sense if it was on 03:09:343 (5,6,7) - since thats where the sound at 03:08:863 (1) - repeats itself I did this because adding notes would be more akward than I want it to be. Also, the sliders are there because that's where the break in the music is. I don't want to break the stream up into a mess.
26. 03:12:463 (1) - removeNC, pretty sure you did that for similar ones in the beginning but might wanna check Nah. Looks super messy without the NC
27. 03:35:143 (1,2,3,4) - this pattern looks kinda out of place compared to anything in the map up until this point tbh and 03:35:263 (2, is pretty powerful here with the extra cymbal in the music, would make that stand out a bit from the others It's fine
28. 03:55:903 (1) - enable kiai on red timing point aswell I'd rather not
29. 04:20:863 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - the rythm doesnt really match the music here like earlier its basicly 12 repition in the song so having 1-(2-3) pattern just sounds off since now you have snares landing on the start of a slider/end of slider just a circle all the way through. Prob alot clearer when this is hitsounded that it'll play off since you kinda have wrong feedback from the hitsounds then Fixed
30. 04:26:143 (1,2,3,4) - maybe break flow here aswell? that drum change is pretty powerfull one of the stronger ones up until this point I'd say so a bit harder would be ok here imo ehhhh maybe
31. 04:39:583 (1,2,3,4) - kinda similar like ^ but spacing wise This one is fine
32. 04:49:183 (3) - and similar would NC here or remove NC from 04:48:943 (1) - making the doubles easier to stand out from the other pattern It doesn't look as nice imo. Also, the 3 is there to help with reading
33. 04:57:103 (9) - NC spacing change IDK why that wasn't NC'd xd
34. 05:04:063 (1,1,2,3) - can you move the stream a bit more to the left here so the slider doesnt overlap that much with 2, not sure but might cause some issues if you overstream here since you'll place your cursor most likely on the very bottom right edge of 1 to start the stream which might cause issues with the slidertail if you overstream I adjusted it
35. 05:20:383 (1) - turn here? you do it for every snare it seems or if it reaches 16combo so why not here I might emphasize it more

aight thats about it, looks nice man gl! THANKS!

burntcedar13 wrote:

welp, here goes nothing

SPOILER

- 00:26:396 (1,2,3,4) - I feel it would be better to make these repeating 1/4 sliders, so that while the tapping rhythm is still following the drum, the hitsounds are following the guitar, rather than there being an empty space in the rhythm The notes are too strong for me to make them non tapible.
- 00:34:076 (1,2) - ^
- 00:54:716 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - I would recommend making this kicksliders, at least on the red ticks, or else it will be 100 100 100 100 through it. but, if score v2 actually happens, it wouldn't make a difference, the player would be fucked either way, so keep that in mind. It's a lot easier to read than you think
- 01:21:329 (1,2,1,2,1) - spacing is so small in the pattern that starts here, it just doesn't look good to me I guess.. idk, spacing is subjective so it's fine, just thought I'd mention it I don't want to emphasize this with jumps.
- 01:34:049 (4) - nc? There isn't a strong beat I want to emphasize here
- 02:01:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this shape doesn't look great imo It's fine
- 02:14:129 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - the previous pattern emphasized groups of three, and then here you switch to groups of two or four, without any noticeable change in the music. why? It was 4 sounds in a collective, so it's fine.
- 02:17:969 (1,2,3) - the flow of this shape is really awful Good. It was made to feel akward to emphasize the little 1/2 in the map
- 02:44:609 (1) - mmmm may be a bit close in terms of whether it's considered 'offscreen' or not :/ Looks fine in the playtest
- 02:52:529 (1,2,3) - previous patterns for this ( 02:49:649 (1,2,1,2) - ) emphasized groups of two or four, now you switched to three without any apparent reason Explained prior
- 03:05:009 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - I do like this pattern, but I feel like it under-emphasizes some things, since the song is a pattern that repeats twice, but the map is a pattern that doesn't repeat I think it's perfect. Give infanitly more emphasis to the parts I am trying to have stick out.
- 03:57:823 (1) - this section feels like a 240 bpm hard, even tho it's a repeat of the four note bursts that you mapped appropriately before :/ They're different rhythms
- 04:20:863 (1,2,3,1,2) - this part of the song is just repeating 04:17:023 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - , is it not? it doesn't make sense to switch from two or four group emphasis to empasizing groups of three Explained before
- 04:30:463 (1,2,3) - flow :/
- 04:37:183 (1,2,3) - ^
- 04:40:063 (1,2,3) - maybe increase the spacing of the 2 and 3, the pattern doesn't look very good as is imo I don't want to emphasize these more thna they have to be
- 04:43:903 (1,2,1,2) - you switched emphasis for seemingly no reason again Explained
- 05:02:143 (1,2,3) - flow
- 05:09:823 (1,2,3) - ^
- 05:21:343 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - I'm not sure how I feel about the way this looks I think it looks great!
- 05:25:574 (2,3) - maybe ctrl+g these? for flow Nah

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

time to get my entire mod rejected actually i was just memeing but there are actual issues with this one lol

flowers and happiness

hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHi want to blow my fucking brains out Me too thanks AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

[my favorite anime is futurama]

1. 00:17:756 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - why this hella spaced and 00:14:876 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - this not ;thjnkig' Fixed
2. 00:19:676 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - lirtly sam as 00:17:756 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - this wtf are you spacing to No they're not. 00:17:756 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - Is pick tremming, while 00:19:676 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - is only one note played
3. 00:49:676 (1,2) - 7.3/10 blanket Actually, it's a perfect blanket https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7299544
4. 01:02:669 (5,6) - overmapped rhythm, it's 1/3, not 1/4. maybe you could do jumps for the 1/3 rhythm? just an option, but you're using the wrong rhythm for these sliders rn, you could just change them to 1/3 too not a big deal Nice catch
5. 01:12:269 (5,6) - ^^^
6. 01:22:289 (1) - from this combo: 01:21:329 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - , you generate a back and forth type of flow which is 100% throw out the window by placing 01:22:289 (1) - in a very linear spot with 01:22:169 (2) - and not getting the reverse direction. the cursor naturally moves back towards 01:21:329 (1,1,1,1) - , and its very misleading. I did this to emphasize the change in guitar pitch and vocal pitch 01:22:289 (1) - by adding an akward transition
7. 01:23:249 (1) - look u did it right here, so y is the prveious part so fcukd, you could just change the previous jump sequence or starting spot You get enough emphasis here from the 1/2 to 1/1 gap along with spacing changes.
8. 01:33:329 (1) - impact is missing Should have been fixed earlier
9. 01:37:169 (1) - wtf u did it here y not before lOL ^
10. 01:38:849 - why the big ass gap and then no added space right here 01:47:249 - ???????//////// Guitar starts 01:42:449
11. 02:15:089 (1) - same thing as before, its completely misleading at this speed to have to move in a line WITH 02:14:969 (2) - and not AWAY from it Explained earlier. It's everywhere for a reason
12. 02:25:649 - his vocal chords just ripped lol hol yshit TFW you sound like an ACTUAL PIG
13. 02:29:489 - aaah fucking christ cringe plz my neck Get better hun
14. 02:56:369 - dude why what is he saying i dont get, is he saying anything at all like wtf is this guy doing Being an ACTUAL PIG
15. 03:00:209 - tbh kinda just sounds like a temper tantrum the more you listen to it "GET OFF THE XBOX JOEL!"
16. 03:42:943 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - wtf are these increasing spacing to, nothing is getting more intense its just all belligerently intense from the beginning i dont understand why these have to increase distance I like it, and nothing will make me change it to a boring pattern
17. 03:50:623 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^^^ nothing is changing, emphasis overmap going on here I'd rather this than some boring thingy
18. 03:57:703 (2) - maybe for readability, stick this one in line with the rest of the stream and not stacked on 03:57:343 (1) - ? No one I know has trouble reading this
19. 03:57:823 - see like you didnt once increase spacing or do any emphasis changing here, which is okay since nothing is getting more intense even tho its basically the same thing as 03:42:943 - and 03:50:623 - This is all 1/2 where those were quads with ~1/1 spacing between them, so it doesn't play intensely.
20. 04:17:983 (1) - linear thing again
21. 04:18:943 (1) - linear thing again
22. 04:35:263 (1) - linear thing again There's a reason it's in the ENTIRE map
23. 04:36:223 (1) - this is fine. its readable, and intuitive and is much more comfortable to land
24. 05:13:183 (1) - lacking impact Fixed
25. 05:17:023 (9) - you switch to not hitsounding this note with a hit-finish for this note? why tho? its literally the exact same thing as 01:33:329 (1) - 02:01:169 (1) - 02:05:009 (1) - 05:13:183 (1) - . also, impact lacking and to be consistent, use NCs Forgot to change this
26. 05:20:863 (9) - ^^^ Self modded

aesthetic was on fleek tho gj with that thank bae ))))))))))))

MrKOSIEJ wrote:

Sup Yo

[General]
Pretty cool map tho i'm not fond of those looong streamz xd. As usualy, but they are really nicely shaped . Thanks, I wanted to focus on stamina more than anything

I'd add 3rd combo color cuz the background gives it to ya. Sure

remove timing point here 00:56:369 - It resets the big white tick, so no
and here 03:55:903 - ^
[AiMOD]
Object's end is not snapped! 00:00:722 Fixed

[MOD]
starting from here 01:30:929 (1) - to 01:38:549 (8) - i think you could make more twists in the stream, it's too simple xd melody offers much more. I'm working on implamenting a new rhythm here, I just need to find the time to add it!
01:31:649 (13,1,5,9,13) - these are the examples on the first part. You could use reverse sliders. It would also add a little chill to the song, but i don't think you want chill xd so diversity then.
Yes, same applies to the second stream I've planned on making tripples with slider ends

02:38:849 (2,3) - move a bit to the right? it seems to little visible Nah, it's a Ctrl+F of 02:38:489 (2) - , so I want it to be similar

02:52:529 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - that's looking so simple xd like you didn't have a good idea for that part. I mean, rhytm is okay, consistent. But i'd change the posistion, aesthetics, you know. I like how this is. It's supose to be downplayed because the focus of the map is stamina. I emphasize it by awkward movements

03:11:189 (4,1) - make the disctance here same as on 03:10:709 (8,1) - I wanted to emphasize 03:11:249 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 's climb more

03:12:703 (1) - same problem (is it the problem xd? opinion i guess). melody is undermapped here, same as before. pay attention to melody and add more twists. Working on it
03:20:383 (1) - same ^
yeah there are a few more.

04:58:303 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - that's looking like a reading hell, i'd suggest making a lil shift with each overlapse Not really
05:05:983 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - same

05:10:783 (1) - back to undermapping melody again xd I know where every section like this is xd Spent a long-ass time in the editor on tthis one

kay that's it, gl with the map and stay metal \m/
and stay black vulture XD

Fenza wrote:

mod

Hitsounds
I like these hitsounds but i'd like you to lower the volume to around 40-45% instead of 70+%. It's too overpowering 50%
also think you should hitsound each drumbeat I want to emphasize things with hitsounds. Every drmbeat would also sound very disjointed and confusing saying the drummer likes to stop and go with them a lot.
00:02:396 (1) - i would add a hitfinish to this since u got hitfinishes on 00:00:472 (1) - and 00:01:436 (1) - you still keep the whistle though There are clear snare hits on the others, but this is all china
00:26:636 (2,3,4) - hitfinishes would be good on these since the guitar (i think thats guitar) sounds alot like the hitfinish. Sure thing
03:42:943 (1) - the red ticks in this section should have a hitclap because there is a distinct drumbeat on each of them Okay
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7312974 etc
03:50:743 (3) - ^ Done dealio


Object Placement
00:17:756 (1) - id make this stream just as spaced as 00:17:756 (1) - because the guitar is just as intense on both parts If one more person says to, I will. The reson that it isn't spaced is because 00:17:756 (1) - is tremming where 00:17:756 (1) - is a rided out strum.
00:21:596 (1) - this one should also be a lot more spaced Why not
00:30:236 (1) - space more here Done
00:36:956 (1) - there is no reason for this to be this spaced since you should focus the shape and spacing of the streams based on the guitar and the guitar is doing nothing significant here. 00:35:036 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - Get's more spaced every strong beat
00:54:236 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - BPM transitions like these are best done with reverse sliders, things like these are really awkward to play, now i know why that stream was so hard to acc lol. The spacing should be enough
01:19:409 (1) - space this out like 01:17:249 (1) - please Not strong of enough beat to justify it imo.
02:13:889 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - why did you stop following the rhythm of the guitar here? I see that the guitar beats now are every 4th beat but you should still have the guitar beats be 1/2 sliders for consistency, this just feels out of place I wanted it to not be boring with something easy to play.
02:16:049 (1,2,3,4) - ^ This one is to show progression/change in the song so things later no't feel random
02:21:809 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
02:29:489 (1) - its really hard to know if this is 1/4 or 1/3 because the spacing is so similar to 02:29:009 (1) - It was hinted just before at 02:25:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - that something with this round shape and spacing is 1/4.
try starting the stream out either with lower spacing or with a 1/4 reverse slider I made 02:28:529 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - extremely curvey for a reason!
03:00:209 (1) - ^
03:07:889 (1) - this is way easier to read (i know the intensity is not the same but this is a step in the right direction) Was trying to keep the spacing of the screams the same. Something you would rag on me about >.>
04:14:143 (1,2) - should use this rhythm here, that slider doesn't follow the song and just sounds really awkward https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7312984 I love this section and think it's fine how it is.
04:26:623 (1) - you're missing some sweet intense stream here, listen to the guitar (dont become mister K's destroyer pls) LMAO, I was following the drums. I don't want to map 04:24:703 (1) - in 1/3 because it doesn't follow the drums which are more prominent because of teh blast beats, and switch it to 1/3 to follow the drums. It would play SUPER gay and awkward.

Bibbity Bill wrote:

here's the mod you asked for

[general]

i would also try to change the combo colors a bit since the dark purples are extremely clashing IMO i would try to make em like dark red dark blue and purple instead Colors are fine. One of the purples are more grey, and the other one is more purple. Maybe it's just your skin, but they're hard to confuse with mine https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7319696
make sure you used whistle2 and clap2 in your map if not, delete em since they are unused Deleted
also consider adding technical and brutal to the tags since it's the genre of music these guys do and rsi since you're mazzerin xd Done dealio

[neverending fall]

00:00:472 (1) - is unsnapped Fixed
00:02:456 (1) - i feel you should extend it to 00:09:476 - I ended it where the background sound platous. I don't want a small gap between the spinnerend and the first note
00:09:596 (1) - might want to make sure that blanket is fine, it looks fine but you could make it slightly better I fixed that myself the other day
00:11:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel maybe you could actually use .7 ds for this, so it goes to .6 > .7 > .8 as it gets louder for that stream section It goes up by .2 every 18 notes
00:15:116 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - i feel you could make the curve here a bit better I love the way it is already
00:18:476 (13,14,15,16) - and here
00:17:756 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - is extremely emphasized and why is the exact same sound extremely under emphasized 00:19:676 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - I needed one more person to ask me that, fuck. I did it because the prior spaced one is tremming while the seconf one is riding out a stum. I'll change it though
00:20:636 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make it around .6 or .7 ds Sure
00:22:976 (8,1) - looks like your spacing is slightly off here Fixed
00:25:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i feel the guitar should be emphasized a bit more here like how you did it on 00:11:996 I did it like I did 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make it like .6 or .7 ds
00:32:156 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel this should of kept .6 d since its the same intensity as the guitar here 00:31:196 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Alrighty
00:33:596 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - looks kinda ugly, and the sound stays the same so why make the spacing increase The first half is the guitar going down in pitch where the second is going up. I like how it looks!
00:35:456 (8,1) - this small jump feels so unecessary i get its to signal the guitar starting but i feel a combo color does the job well enough Fine how it is
00:39:836 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i feel like the spacing increase here is too small considering its the last part before the slow section starts so i recommend something like 1.0 into 1.2 spacing Okay
00:42:356 (2) - you could touch up the blanket here a bit I removed teh blanket to fit the part I changed
00:42:716 (1) - i feel this should be a part of 1 and 2 and have the nc start 00:43:676 (2) - so the nc starts when it picks up pace Was NC's to show the change from 1/2 to 1/1
00:51:356 (2) - you should nc this so its more consistant with how you nced the other build up notes here 00:43:676 (2,1,1) - No reason for it to be NC'd. I NC'd everything else becaue it was either a stang beat, change in timing, or a start of a new section
00:53:516 (1,2) - repeat the same blanket thing you used here 00:49:676 (1,2) - Not needed imo
00:54:716 (1) - make this 1.0 spacing No, it changes BPM, so I changed teh spacing
01:10:394 (2) - this note looks slightly off Moved 01:10:319 (1) -
01:15:494 (6) - same as the earlier spots it looks slightly off xd Remapping thsi section
01:17:249 (1) - i feel having this random spacing change on the last note looks off i get putting the increase on spacing during the scream but i feel as you never did it anywhere else earlier in the map why do it there Did it to emphasize the extreme sound there, but I'll medle with it
01:21:089 (1) - same here also
01:26:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel the spacing should be atleast .4 for this stream since its more intense than 01:24:209 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Perfect how it is
01:28:529 (9) - should be nced since it changes sound Not really
01:30:869 (4,1) - same as what i have said earlier i feel the small jump here is unneeded Remapping these parts
01:32:849 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this curve lol fix pls Was made to emphasize 01:33:329 (1) - , but I'm remapping this section anyway
01:37:889 (1,2,3,4) - this random curve looks bad ^
01:48:449 (1) - and here i feel like you should make the volume slowly rise since its fading in since the sound starts 01:47:969 - Okay
01:53:969 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel this stream should also have 1.0 spacing so the spacing changes when the guitar starts Nah
02:02:369 (1) - i feel this nc doesnt really have much of a meaning Remapping these parts. Was there for consistancy and a large sound
02:08:369 (2) - nc should definitely be here by how the sound changes compared to 1 Sure
02:09:089 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - i get the idea of how you were trying to do the stream here but i feel it looks really ugly with that extremely small into large spacing in such a short time, just try to make the spacing a bit larger on the smaller parts would look alot cleaner IMO This stream is orgasmic. I will not change it
02:17:489 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - this stream doesnt look that pretty with the inconsistant spacing on the same sound intensity IMO try to make all the notes one spacing there The drums roll down and become quieter along with teh guitar. I want to keep it how it is
02:25:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this spacing is really large when its not even the most intense part of the song tone it down slightly pls Hell no. It's a scream with intense tremming with doublebass. Most intense part of teh song if you ask me
02:28:529 (1,2,3) - i dont hear any guitar sound here so it should be singletaps Guitar is very hard to map to. I made it all 1/3 because guitarists can't play to every note like the drummer can because no metronome besides the drums. It is VERY hard to play to an exact not on guitar. If you want to see a prime example, look at Promethean Kings and the parts where Mazzerin mapped to the guitar
02:29:009 (1,2,3) - i dont like how you increased the spacing here when its the same intensity as 02:28:769 (1,2,3) - you should consider reducing it slightly or buffing 2:28 The guitar is growing in pitch, so will my stream
02:29:489 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same as earlier i feel this spacing is overkill reduce it a bit pls, if youre gonna deny what i said on 2:29 consider buffing Nah
02:30:209 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - since its the same intensity of the vocals with drastically smaller spacing This is mapped to the drums.
02:30:449 (1,2,3,4) - also i feel like this should have 1.0 spacing too but i feel with how youre nearly offscreen you would have to rework 02:30:689 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - which i feel would be for the better
02:36:209 (1,2,3) - same as what i said earlier i dont hear any 1/3rd beats here i only hear singletaps
02:36:689 (1,2,3) - same as what i said earlier i feel the spacing increase here on the 2nd half of the guitar is unneeded when its the same intensity
02:40:529 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel you need to move this over a bit so it is .6 instead of .66 for the spacing Sure
02:51:029 (8,1) - ive said this earlier but i feel it doesnt warrent a jump there when the intensity doesnt change one bit It was designed to emphasize 02:51:089 (1) - and teh following spacing changes.
02:54:329 (4) - i feel this note is slightly too far out considering the rest of your jumps are fairly small and then that note goes too far out consider moving it a bit closer 02:54:449 (1) - Is an extremely strong note and is a start of a new pattern. Seems justified to my
02:56:369 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - as i said earlier this spacing is waaaay too large for these vocals when they arnt even the most intense part of the song Reworked 02:57:569 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - because I hated it
02:57:569 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these notes should get bigger spacing since that sound is pretty intense
02:59:249 (1,2,3) - as ive said a million times already earlier i hear no 1/3rd notes here
02:59:729 (1,2,3) - and i dont hear any intensity change in the guitar to have bigger spacing
03:00:209 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - shouldnt have giantic spacing when it isnt that intense, as i said earlier if you want to keep the giantic spacing 03:00:929 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - should have similar spacing due to it being the same sounds
03:04:049 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - is undermapped thats super intense compared to the same exact spacing you used for the filler streams It's a low growl, so I don't need to emphasize it as much as say a scream
03:05:969 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - same as above
03:05:369 (3,4,5) - i feel this spacing is a bit too small compared to how the other jumps spacings were ex: 03:03:089 (1,2,1,2) - The examples were mapped to raising notes. these are static, so an anti-jump works
03:07:889 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - same as what i said earlier on these parts i feel like it needs larger spacing just due to the intensity
03:09:089 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this is overmapped i feel There's 1/4th drums here. If you mean overdone, I'd still have to disagree
03:11:009 (1,2,3,4) - this should have a .75 spacing gap between the notes so it lines up as the same gap as 03:10:709 (8) - Nah, the pitch is lowering, so I'm doing that with the spacing. Also, a .05 addition to that is huge for streams with such low DS like these
03:11:249 (1) - i feel the 1.25 gap is too large for this and make it .75 like the rest I think this looks and plays orgasmicly, so I'll keep it how it is
03:12:703 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - should have .7 spacing since its the same intensity as 03:14:143 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1) - I won't chnage anything in this section. I think it's perfect
03:35:143 (1,2,3) - as i said earlier i feel these notes are slightly too small for the spacing you have on these jumps
03:42:463 (1) - using bpm to manipulate slider speeds is unrankable iirc unless thats actually 125 bpm. yea if you want to change slider speed just switch the gamemode to taiko make it .25 slider velocity then switch back to all gamemodes and not change the bpm there for just the slider The bpm is changed to a much slower pace
03:48:223 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - this whole stream looks fairly bad for that i would recommend having 03:48:223 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - notes be 1.0 spacing into 03:48:703 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - being .7 03:49:183 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - being 1.0 03:49:663 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - being back into .7 I like it how it is
03:50:143 (1) - same as earlier bpm changes to manipulate slider speeds is unrankable iirc
03:55:903 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this stream feels really mushed together try to spread it out a bit more since it looks compact as fuck "Warning, slow section ahead"
04:19:183 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i feel these notes should be 1.0 spacing since its just right before the most intense part of the song IMO Nah
04:19:663 (1,2,3,4,1) - this just looks weird to me being super small for no reason Snares are halted here, so is the movement
04:24:703 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i feel the spacing here should be slightly bigger than 1.0 since IMO intense blastbeats + the guitar solo warrent extreme spacing IMO Ehhh, maybe
04:26:623 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - spacing too small when IMO its one of the intense sections of the song I don't want jumps here
04:28:543 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - and same here spacing too small
04:32:263 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - is too large of spacing and i feel 04:33:343 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - l is more intense so it should get the larger spacing overall, that whole section should just get the spacing reversed Drumrolls should be compact in my eyes
04:34:303 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - same reasons i had earlier i feel the filler is really small when the sections super intense Nah
04:38:383 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - same as earlier increase spacing
04:39:103 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - since this is the end stream for the intense section it should have large spacing too I'd rather not
04:57:103 (1,2,3,4) - i dont hear stream sounds here Neither do I
05:00:943 (1,2,3,4) - i dont hear any stream sounds here once again Fixed
05:04:783 (1,2,3,4) - once again i dont hear notes here Alrighty
05:07:903 (1) - this slider curve looks really odd IMO maybe make it a straight repeat slider Supose to mirror 05:08:143 (1,2,3,4) - 's curve
05:08:623 (1,2,3,4) - once again i dont really here notes here kk
05:12:283 (10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i feel you could make this curve look better since atm its kinda ugly Remapping these sections
05:16:783 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - same as earlier i feel you could make this stream look a bit more rounded Same as before
05:25:574 (2) - i dont really hear any sound worth emphasizing here so i would remove that note and just make it 3 notes there There's a snare and dip of vocals here. Why I only added a clap
05:26:291 (1) - also you should lower the volume in this spot gradually since it fades out Sure

• 
  [the one and only diff]

1. Main problem i have with this map is there isn't much of a differentiation between some sections, like 01:24:209 (1) - this section here only has double kicks whereas the first kiai has the blazing solo with more rhythm variety.
   - What I suggest you do in the first kiai is focus on the guitar rhythm, like:
   + 00:18:716 (1,2,3,4) - this being a reverse slider .
   + 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream could follow the pitch of the guitar a bit better
   + 00:13:916 (1,2,3) - being 1 reverse slider and 00:14:396 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - being 2 reverse slider.
   + 00:20:636 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - snapping this to the guitar instead https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7327326 .
   + 00:22:316 (1,2) - snapping to 1/3
   + 00:25:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - more sliders here to allow more movement.
   etc. a lot more things you can do to make the guitar more prominent. The reason why I recommend you to follow the guitar is because that is what makes it stands out from 02:40:049 (1) - drum-heavy/rhythm guitar heavy sections like this.
2. 03:12:703 (1) - spacing too big for doublekicks (this is a global issue imo, check other places where you map exclusively for doublekicks). Large spacing for doublekicks -> less emphasis for other instruments. Example would be 03:40:783 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this. Snare would have a lot more emphasis if the doublekicks had less spacing.
3. 03:07:409 (1,2,3,4) - guitar is very ambiguous here, don't think it should be snapped to 1/3 though, seems like more sounds 03:07:409 (1,2,3) - here than 1/3. You could map it 1/4 with large spacing for this bit imo.
4. 03:09:089 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - stream is overmapped tho, only 1/2 is audible for me.
5. 03:25:423 (2,3) - NC 2 to prevent potential misread.
6. 03:35:143 (1,2,3,4) - not sure what you're trying to emphasise with a 1/2 square.
7. 03:42:943 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i can hear quite a clear sound on the fifth ticks, have a check again imo.
8. 03:55:903 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - spacing for snares too small, difference in spacing between snares and kicks are not very noticeable.
9. 03:57:823 (1,2,1,2) - 1/2 rhythm is such a big contrast to the riff. I'd prefer if these were like the previous part. No it's not boring to play those bursts I swear to you, just make them look a bit different, like rotate 90 or 180 for each time, that should be enough visual variation. You can also use kicksliders as well, not necessary just 5 bursts
10. 04:03:583 (1,2,3,4) - these are overmapped , the kicks start on 5.
11. 04:28:543 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - why not streams? Also the blast beats are so strong these patterns become very underwhelming, it has to have at least 04:26:623 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this sort of intensity, you can go for a different pattern but the intensity is at least 1/2 circle spam. Same for the repeated section after that.
12. 04:40:063 (1,2,3) - this fits perfectly tho.

LMT wrote:

• 
  [the one and only diff]

1. Main problem i have with this map is there isn't much of a differentiation between some sections, like 01:24:209 (1) - this section here only has double kicks whereas the first kiai has the blazing solo with more rhythm variety.
   - What I suggest you do in the first kiai is focus on the guitar rhythm, like:
   + 00:18:716 (1,2,3,4) - this being a reverse slider . This is notes because the main pitch of the guitar hasn't changed.
   + 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream could follow the pitch of the guitar a bit better Works perfectly with the guitar.
   + 00:13:916 (1,2,3) - being 1 reverse slider and 00:14:396 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - being 2 reverse slider. 00:14:396 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - is a seperate sound from 00:14:156 (3) -
   + 00:20:636 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - snapping this to the guitar instead https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7327326 . Why?
   + 00:22:316 (1,2) - snapping to 1/3 The entire guitar here is 1/3. The patterns reflect the guitar while the streams are mapped to the drums.
   + 00:25:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - more sliders here to allow more movement. Doesn't need to be changed
   etc. a lot more things you can do to make the guitar more prominent. The reason why I recommend you to follow the guitar is because that is what makes it stands out from 02:40:049 (1) - drum-heavy/rhythm guitar heavy sections like this. I reflect the guitar a LOT in the map with spacing changes. Just because it's guitar doesn't mean I have to put a kickslider there.
2. 03:12:703 (1) - spacing too big for doublekicks (this is a global issue imo, check other places where you map exclusively for doublekicks). Large spacing for doublekicks -> less emphasis for other instruments. Example would be 03:40:783 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this. Snare would have a lot more emphasis if the doublekicks had less spacing. Just because it's double bass doesn't mean it has to be compact. The spacing is fine.
3. 03:07:409 (1,2,3,4) - guitar is very ambiguous here, don't think it should be snapped to 1/3 though, seems like more sounds 03:07:409 (1,2,3) - here than 1/3. You could map it 1/4 with large spacing for this bit imo. The reason it sounds faster is because guitarists can't play on a metronome as well as say a drummer. It sounds off and would be 100% unplayable if I mapped it to each string. That being said, the overall rhythm of teh guitar here is in fact 1/3.
4. 03:09:089 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - stream is overmapped tho, only 1/2 is audible for me. Turn your volume up and your playback rate down. There are snares on the blue ticks
5. 03:25:423 (2,3) - NC 2 to prevent potential misread. What is there to missread here?
6. 03:35:143 (1,2,3,4) - not sure what you're trying to emphasise with a 1/2 square. I'm not. It breaks flow on 03:35:143 (1) - and is small spacing. Nothing is being emphasized but the first note
7. 03:42:943 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i can hear quite a clear sound on the fifth ticks, have a check again imo. Mapped to drums, not guitar
8. 03:55:903 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - spacing for snares too small, difference in spacing between snares and kicks are not very noticeable. I hate this stream
9. 03:57:823 (1,2,1,2) - 1/2 rhythm is such a big contrast to the riff. I'd prefer if these were like the previous part. No it's not boring to play those bursts I swear to you, just make them look a bit different, like rotate 90 or 180 for each time, that should be enough visual variation. You can also use kicksliders as well, not necessary just 5 bursts This is 1/2, not 1/4.
10. 04:03:583 (1,2,3,4) - these are overmapped , the kicks start on 5. They're not
11. 04:28:543 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - why not streams? Also the blast beats are so strong these patterns become very underwhelming, it has to have at least 04:26:623 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this sort of intensity, you can go for a different pattern but the intensity is at least 1/2 circle spam. Same for the repeated section after that. Because I was mapping to the drums. I don't want a 1/3 stream where there are 1/4 drums, that is extremely hard to acc. Also, moving from 1/4 to 1/3 JUST for streams is a poor choice and plays horrible. You can't really make it flow into the guitar from teh drums, thus I made it 1/2. There are streams there though, so I will map to the blast beats
12. 04:40:063 (1,2,3) - this fits perfectly tho.

doesn't look like a lot but a lot of these problems repeat themselves in the map, i'm just giving examples to get the message across.

diraimur wrote:

hoyl 8* how to mod this

- 00:53:876 (2) - is actually 1/3 not 1/2 Mapped to the drums which are 1/2
- 02:34:649 (3,3) - consider spacing these more from previous note since they are stronger than 02:33:689 (3,3) - yet you spaced them more I'm remapping a lot of the 1/2 in this map.
- 02:48:689 - increase overall spacing a little bit there so 02:49:529 (2,1) - this jump doesnt look as awkward imo I actually think this part is fine. People don't have trouble playing, and it fits.
- 02:51:569 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - is there any way you could smooth this stream a little bit? it looks kinda too harsh The riff isn't smooth, so why should teh stream?
- 03:02:069 (4,1) - correct me if im wrong but you never used 1/4 jump on last note of stream b4 so why use it here, decreasing spacing would look better imo (like check 03:04:949 (8,1) - etc) Fixed
- 03:05:369 (3,4,5) - 3->4 has follow points but 4->5 doesnt (k this is kinda unneccessary but it triggers me k /me runs) This is a perfect triangle. I won't mess that up because of OCD
- 04:11:743 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe make this section sth like [url=04:11:743 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -]this[/url] so its consistent with 04:12:703 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The shape doesn't need to be the same.
- 04:14:143 (3) - i'd personally remove one repeat and place notes at 04:14:743 - and 04:14:863 - similar to what you did on 04:14:023 - and 04:14:143 - I remapped this a while ago but failed to upload it.
- 04:24:223 (5) - mayb nc Why not
- 04:25:903 - is there a reason why you used a flow break here? i cant hear anything different in song, maybe just make it an S shape instead of flow change would work better i m o Maybe teh massive shift in guitar pitch?
- 04:33:583 - ^
- 04:39:343 - ^
werd mep

Thank for mod

Nite wrote:

aaaaaa ssssss
-00:47:996 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - That stream does not look nice IMO, maybe do another loop of a stream like 00:47:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) but in a different direction. You can keep the stream if you want. I like it
- 01:17:489 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Stream looks hard to see, but that might just be me. If you want you can move the circles around. It looks a hell of a lot better in game xd
- 01:52:049 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Change the circles. It doesn't fit the music IMO. You can do the same thing on 01:54:929 (1,2,3,4) or maybe add different sliders. Or change the circle placements. I don't feel like it's needed
- 01:54:929 (1,2,3,4) - The reverse sliders feel out of place, after it is just a long stream. You can repeat the reverse sliders afterwards or remove them. I need to make this somehwat playable. As it stands, Gayz has trouble stamming this.
- 03:05:369 (2,3,5) - Those circles feel a bit awkward to hit. The circles can have a bigger spacing. Looks fine to me
- 03:09:089 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I don't like the stream being there. I would do the same beat on 03:05:369 (1,2,3,4,5,1)I likey how it is
- 03:41:263 (1,2,3,4) - Again I feel like the stream is hard to see, but it might just be my poor eyesight (rip me). Same with 03:41:983 (1,2,3,4). Same as before
- 04:32:143 (5) - Feels weird to have a small pause after a stream, maybe putting a reverse slider could help the player carry onto the next stream, but it is optional. Added a 3/4 slider
- 04:33:343 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like the look of the slider, I think it could follow the guitar a bit better if the circles are moved. Ehhh maybe if someone else asks
- 04:40:063 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Maybe make the circle spacing increase gradually over time. I think it would fit it nicely with the song. Nah, this part is fine imo
-04:57:103 (1) I think a slider would sound a lot better (I didn't like the pause). Same with 05:00:943 (1) and 05:04:783(1) and 05:08:623 (1). I think it looks and plays super cool, so I'll keep it

There are quite a lot of the same problems but they can be easily fixed

• 
  
  00:00:476 (1) - listen to the guitar closely, this rhythm choice is very at fault, 00:00:656 - this is the guitar release/note where you want your sliderend on.
  not on an essential drum making it unclear what rhythm you are following.
  
  00:01:436 (1) - It's less audible here but should still follow the same logic.
  
  00:10:316 (1) - guitar starts here, yet there is no differentiation in placement or rhythm. 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4) - make a manual stack here or w/e.
  
  00:12:956 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 1x streams is the wrong intensity, it should be 0.6x , compare the song with 00:11:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - fyi.
  
  00:11:996 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:13:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same intensity/section yet different spaced streams, it doesn't really make sense.
  
  00:13:916 (1,2,3) - would reverse this rhythm as that section is denser here 00:14:156 (3) -
  
  00:15:056 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - doesn't really look like you used a bowed slider for this stream, would improve quality.
  
  
  01:15:569 (1) - these parts; guitar is way more fun to follow here, you could so some personal slider designs there, why wouldn't you?
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  01:37:889 (2,1) - this jump is too large.
  
  02:48:209 (1,2) - the guitar changes massively in intensity, emphasize this.
  
  03:57:823 (1,2,1,2) - this rhythm&placement choice is at fault , the song's guitar 1 2 pattern will feel extremely jarring if you don't follow it!!
  
  05:21:343 (1,2) - there is no 1/3 snaps here, the guitar is 1/4 but death metal can't always play it perfectly, also snares are more prominent and those are 1/2.

zev wrote:

queue. hi

• 
  
  00:00:476 (1) - listen to the guitar closely, this rhythm choice is very at fault, 00:00:656 - this is the guitar release/note where you want your sliderend on.
  not on an essential drum making it unclear what rhythm you are following. This is mapped to the drums
  
  00:01:436 (1) - It's less audible here but should still follow the same logic.
  
  00:10:316 (1) - guitar starts here, yet there is no differentiation in placement or rhythm. 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4) - make a manual stack here or w/e. It actually starts 00:10:076 (1) - with a downward pitch into a higher one.
  
  00:12:956 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 1x streams is the wrong intensity, it should be 0.6x , compare the song with 00:11:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - fyi. This section all moves up in DS. it's to emphasize the spacing decrease on 00:13:436 (1) -
  
  00:11:996 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:13:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same intensity/section yet different spaced streams, it doesn't really make sense. Was done to emphasize the huge shit in pitch
  
  00:13:916 (1,2,3) - would reverse this rhythm as that section is denser here 00:14:156 (3) - The heads of 00:13:916 (1,2) - are very noticable unlike the reverses of 00:14:156 (3) - in terms of pitch change
  
  00:15:056 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - doesn't really look like you used a bowed slider for this stream, would improve quality. Looks fine imo
  
  
  01:15:569 (1) - these parts; guitar is way more fun to follow here, you could so some personal slider designs there, why wouldn't you? Because it would be wierd holding a slider with blast beats in the background
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  01:37:889 (2,1) - this jump is too large. For who?
  
  02:48:209 (1,2) - the guitar changes massively in intensity, emphasize this. I did with slider reverses
  
  03:57:823 (1,2,1,2) - this rhythm&placement choice is at fault , the song's guitar 1 2 pattern will feel extremely jarring if you don't follow it!! That's why I NC'd each strong strum.
  
  05:21:343 (1,2) - there is no 1/3 snaps here, the guitar is 1/4 but death metal can't always play it perfectly, also snares are more prominent and those are 1/2. Guitars are hard to play on a metronome. Also, it follows 1/3 more than 1/4 and 1/2.

gl dud. Thanky

Mapper wrote:

awesome song ikr

general:
maybe lower the hp to 5,5 to make it a bit more passable xd It's a stream map, HP is super easy to regain. Also, get better

NEVERENDING FALL

00:00:956 (1) - this overlap is ugly, maybe move it a bit to the right and do the same with the (1) after that, heres an example on what you can do I like it how it is
00:09:236 - why did you put the inheriting point here? To bring sound back for 00:09:596 (1) - . but I moved it
00:09:596 (1) - the bottom curve that blankets with the stream can be a bit improved I guess?
00:12:476 (1) - why nc here when there isnt a nc at 00:10:556 (9) - Because the DS doesn't change
00:15:056 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - this circle pattern can be improved Looks fine to me
00:17:276 (1,2) - too curved imo Nah
00:18:236 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - doesnt look too good I like it
00:22:316 (1,2) - maybe you could delete (2) and make (1) a 1/3 repeat Sure
00:31:916 (1) - unneeded nc Agreed
00:41:996 (1) - maybe make this sound clickable by shortening the repeat by 1 "repeat" and put a slider after it and a circle at 00:42:476 - Nah
00:44:156 (1) - is this nc necessary Shows change in rhythm from 5/1 to 1/1
00:44:876 (1) - ^ Consistancy 00:40:796 (1,1) -
00:48:716 (1) - ^ you get it
00:54:716 (1,1) - too curved as well imo I likey
01:15:569 - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NO TENDIES ON MY PLATE!
01:23:489 (2) - how about to overlapping this with 01:22:409 (2) - ? I want the seeable DS change. Makes it better for reading
01:51:329 (1) - unneeded nc imo Fenza added these NC's when hitsounding.
01:52:289 (1) - same, they appear a bit everywhere, unless you have a good explanation i suggest you check for them and un-nc it Yee
02:17:009 (1,2,1,2,1) - too spaced, this isnt promethean kings XD Yeah it is, DUH
02:31:289 (3,1) - fix stack Not supose to be stacked
02:53:969 (1,3) - this overlap is weird, this is better Did something different
03:19:423 (1,2) - fix blanket Done
03:47:923 (4,6) - avoid this overlap, maybe move 03:47:743 (1,2,3,4) - up a bit It's hardly noticable, but I might
03:58:543 (2,1,2) - noob blanket xdxxdx You can suck my weenie
04:07:183 (3,4,1) - ultranoob blanket STAP MAKING FUN OF ME!!!!!
04:13:423 (1,2) - silent the blue ticks Sure
04:18:943 (1) - random nc I've thought about this one for a long-ass time before, and I don't want a (3) or for the stream to be not NC'd, si I'll leave it
04:31:903 (1,2,3,4) - too curvy, maybe make it less I think it looks amazing
04:50:863 (1,3) - swap ncs I just NC'd every other one
04:53:023 (5) - nc here maybe ^
05:11:743 (1) - maybe make this circular compared to the stream, like this ehhhhhhhhhhhh, nah
05:17:503 (1,2) - too curved Nigga, that's a slight-ass curve.
05:26:226 - maybe make a kiai burst here? also add finish to (1) Why not

nice map, just some small issues i pointed out. nothing big in general. good luck with rank! Thanky <3

Kyu96 wrote:

[Kyu's Mod - Cytotoxin - Abysm Nucleus]

00:17:276 (1,2) - I think this is an inconsistency to the reverse sliders used here : 00:18:956 (1,2,3) . Try to shape
them the same way. 00:17:276 (1) - is too deep of a curve imo to be put at a vertical position. It will look bad and play not as well. On the other hand, 00:19:196 (2) - is too soft a an angle.

00:26:636 (2,3,4) - All of these 3 are on dominant (different sounds). I'd NC them and reposition them with I'll NC 00:26:636 (1) -
different spacing like this : http://i.imgur.com/eD1y8rX.jpg But I don't see a problem with how they are at the current state. They emphasize the sound with small spacing rather than large

This emphasizes the impact of that section a bit more and also looks aesthetically more appealing.

00:54:716 (1,1) - They are curved to much imo, - also another inconsitency with the slider shortly after : Why?
00:55:783 (2) - give em' the same curve.

00:57:569 (7) - NC here coz dominant sound. This 00:57:869 (1) - is a dominant sound. (7) is soft
01:00:119 (1) - Remove NC here and NC here instead : 00:59:969 (15)
01:04:919 (1) - Remove NC here and NC here instead : 01:04:769 (15)
01:06:119 (1) - Remove NC here and NC here instead : 01:05:969 (7) For all the above, the drummer is very inconsistant to where he hits a strong sound. If I NC every strong beat, it will be a mess. I'll keep it the way it is for consistancy sake.
01:06:119 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I feel like this stream doesn't fit very well. Especially because of the dominant sound The reason it's there is to emphasize 01:05:969 (7) - with the jump from it to the next note

here 01:06:269 (3) which you didn't emphasize at all.
Definitly NC here : 01:07:169 (7)
Hmm I think you should NC here as well 01:09:569 (15), I guess you can see the pattern I am referring to now, it

appears a few more times later on, so I won't mention it again.
I feel like that 1/3 stream should start here: 01:34:049 (2) - , would fit better imo because that's where the guitar
starts to intensify. blast beats don't ent until 01:34:289 (1) - , no the guitar doesn't level out until there. I'll keep it how it is

Also I am not a big fan of the streamshape. It's not wrong, but how about sth like this :

http://i.imgur.com/hH9icOX.jpg ? I like how it looks already.
02:11:729 (1,2,3) - These triangle parts fit perfectly, just wanted to say. Yee, I like em
02:14:129 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - You fucked up the rythm here a bit. Listen closely. Its baaa boom boom boom baaa
boom boom boom. - Either highly this with correct NC'ing or a different pattern. Fixed this pattern up. Happy with the resault
The way it's mapped at the moment it doesn't fit the song that well.

Same goes for the next jump pattern : 02:15:089 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^

02:17:729 (1,2,3,4) - Ctrl+h this, looks and flows much better. I wanted it so I could emphasize 02:17:729 (1) - with more than a NC and spacing change. Also, it gives 02:17:369 (2) - a blanket!
02:25:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Did you got inspired by Mazz' Senseless Massacre here? :thinking: I listedned to this and was like "I bet Mazzerin did something like this in Senseless. He sure did
02:29:249 (4) - Ctrl+J this, and rotate by 35 degree so it looks like this : http://i.imgur.com/wG6CEjA.jpg I made a better blanket. I think it plays just fine how it is
02:41:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think it has already mentioned by
other modders before me, - and even tho you rejected it I highly recommend you to map to the guitar here not to I emphasize the guitar where it's needed, 02:43:889 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -

the drums! The guitar has a very interessting rythm and you didn't emphasize it at all.
02:43:409 (9) - NC here remove NC here : 02:43:529 (1) - .. They're teh same intensity. I didn't NC 02:43:409 (9) - because the jump is all that's needed.
02:45:329 (9) - 02:45:449 (1) - ^ .. Won't mention this again now aaa Same
02:45:449 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - Same as before, please
map the guitars here, much more interessting then the drums, and no, the spacing changes/direction changes don't

emphasize the guitar Map guitar not drums here pls.
02:54:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This fits, - but it is really fucking hard to play I think, maybe consider None of my play testers have issues with this

a different pattern.
03:14:143 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Follow guitars here , not drums. I emphasize the really strong notes, not the softer ones
You skipped a relevant sound here 03:20:023 - and here 03:20:263 - Sure
03:21:583 (5) - Make stream till here, and the focus on guitars.
03:29:503 (1) - ^
Same for the next stream.
You might prefer to map to the drums but mapping the guitars in these sections would fit much better and
represent the song nicer. You don't lose out on anything imo

03:42:463 (1) - This stream shape at here looks not that fitting imo. sth like this would be cooler : The sound is smooth, not wavey wor filled with reverb. The shape fits perfectly

http://i.imgur.com/jYFnUdm.jpg
If you decide to go with that shape, move the little stack 03:42:943 (1,2,3,4) - here more to the left as seen in the

picture.
03:50:143 (1) - Think of a different stream shape here ass well.
03:59:983 (2,2) - Fuck up rythm. Why? Coz the first slider here 03:59:743 (1) - starts on a strong beat and ends on a less strong beat. the next one starts on a weak beat..? (Quoting pishi : Always start sliders on strong sound and end them on less strong sounds)
Same for the next two sliders. Clean your ears my nig, (2) 100% starts on a strong beat. No question
04:00:703 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This double pattern doesn't emphasize the rythm well, NC'ing is not enough here imo, map a different pattern to emphasize the 1/4th rythm here a bit better. You get the emphasis from the NC and shift in patten 04:01:183 (1) - here
Same points applies for the next parts aka 04:06:463 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - and 04:08:383 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - and 04:10:303 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - etc etc. (Also same for the sldiers inbetween).
Not a big fan of the jump patterns, they are not wrong but you could emphasize the beat better.
For example the dominant sounds are here : 04:43:903 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - You just mapepd 1/2 jump spam.
Please look into this again.They fit prefectly
04:56:383 (1) - This is a cool sldiershape! Thank
05:11:743 (1) - This isn't imo. To curvy imo. I can get behind that
05:14:143 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - I talked about this stream earlier in my mod, consider modifying the shape a little. Nah

OD10 is to much go with 9 or 9.5. (Into the Void uses OD9 as well, and is at the same bpm, so notelock won't be a problem if you go with 9.X). 10 is a bit to much imo. This isn't Into teh Void though. This focuses on stamina, and OD10 is fitting for that theme.

Cool map x)

TheOnlyLeon wrote:

I'm kinda amazed I haven't modded this considering that we've done IRC a couple times now, so I'm doing it live, have fun. There's a first for everything

NEVERENDING FALL

00:17:756 - This spacing is uncalled for, earlier you used this spacing because of the high pitch of the guitar which is fair, but while there is a pitch increase here it's nowhere near the level it was when you last used this kind of stream spacing, as it stands you've already divided your map 17 seconds in. I agree with that, and it was mapped accordingly, but every single mod said it should be spaced like the part prior. I caved in and changed it

00:18:716 - There is a big drum hit here so I can get behind the direction shift, but spacing wise this stream should not change here, the pitch and volume of the guitar are consistent. There's a lot happening on this note like a pitch change in the backup guitar and the strong note along with being a start for the kicksliders the follow.

00:19:676 - This is the same issue, you've got your direction shifts on track but the spacing is almost arbitrary. Backup guitar

00:25:436 - And this is opposite, by the logic for spacing you created with the intro, this segment should have decently high spacing, but right now it's almost a stack with close to no spacing, it's got a heavy pitch increase and the guitar becomes dominant over the drum track, yet you've pretty much mapped the drums. 00:10:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Same sound

00:32:156 - I get that the rotation changes here, but you've had a sharp turn on literally every powerful kick until now, and here you keep it smooth, normally wouldn't be a problem, but literally EVERY kick before this one has had a sharp angle. Sure, I'll make it more impactful

00:36:956 - I guess you're changing that pattern now since there's another one here, I still think it's really inconsistent but w/e

00:53:516 - for consistency this should be blanketed around the head of 2. Done?

01:57:089 (1) - Something about this entire stream is just very messy looking, you may want to consider reshaping this part since it just doesn't have any clear shape like your previous streams all had. I don't think there's anything wrong with this, but if others have the same problem, I'll change it

02:00:689 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Why are these separated, every other triple has been noticeably separated in the music, but there isn't anything here, this should just be a 7 stack onto a 1/4 slider, doing that would let you transition back to your same style of triplet very cleanly without causing weird inaccuracy. I want it to be clear that 02:00:689 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - is different from 01:59:729 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - because one is mapped to the vocals while the other is to the guitar

02:17:369 (1,2) - I can't help but feel this jump is really awkwardly placed, it'd make more sense you lean it over but keep it mostly vertical to keep with your theme of ping pong jumps, maybe stacking it over the head of slider 2 would work well. Ctrl+G'd 02:17:249 (1,2) -

03:05:609 (5) - This is weird, just move 5 up to the top left corner, it'd make so much more sense in relation to the structure of the map so far, plus I actually think increasing the spacing would make this feel more comfortable than weirdly stopping most cursor motion. A lot of people have problems with this part. I remapped it

THIS APPLIES TO THIS ENTIRE SECTION
03:12:703 (1) - This stream just ignoring the dominant bass is weird, especially since this is the part of the song that accentuates it the most, I think you would have a significantly better time if you had a 1/4 kick and a jump to the next segment at each of these kicks. I think teh section is fine. I like how it is

03:17:983 (4) - Move this slider a tiny bit up, the tail is slightly overlapping with the 2 circle below it. Okay

03:19:903 (1,2,3,4) - I can't help but feel like these should be two sliders instead of four circles :/ Same

04:31:423 (1) - This transition is pretty ugly looking, you could either shift the second part of the stream down entirely so that the stack leads directly into the first note, or you could pull it up and to the left making a bit of a snap between the sections of this stream part, your choice. I personally think the transition is nice. Gives good emphasis and looks cool imo

04:40:063 (1,2,3) - Why is the spacing suddenly so small? Earlier you've had several instances of this exact pattern and it's never had small spacing before, this is especially strange coming out of the heaviest streams in the entire map. The vocals are tight and quiet along with the guitar. I think it it suits the song very nicely.


I will give you big props for one thing about this map, you are one of the only people I've ever seen handle the transition between 1/3 and 1/4 streams well. I think large amounts of this map are well done, but I mentioned a handful of pretty glaring inconsistencies and oddities that're holding the map back and making it impossible to justify a lot of how you mapped the song, by making things consistent you'll find it much easier to identify how it should be mapped and you'll be able to accurately judge when something needs a change or when it works and helps your ideas flourish. Either way you've been trying for a long time, hope this helps, GL with this set.