1. Enlever (5.12 stars, 1186 notes)

1. 01:08:190 (1) - maybe nc here instead? dont think that the music suggests to pair 01:07:860 (1,2,3) - with 01:09:179 (1,2,3) - nc-wise imo
2. 05:09:508 (1) - ^
   02:24:674 (1) - 03:29:289 (1) - here you have it like i suggest, keep somple things like that clean and consistent
3. 02:12:970 (3) - nc? still similiar to 03:17:586 (1) -
4. 02:35:223 (6) - nc like at 01:18:740 -
5. 03:39:838 (3) - ^
6. 05:20:223 - ^
7. 03:12:311 (3) - nc here would make more sense
8. 03:22:860 (1,1,1,1) - nice pattern but the spacing emphasis goes really off here compared to other intense parts. maybe make the same pattern, but not a straight line which currently forces the linear ds. or maybe make 1/4sliders instead.
9. 02:18:245 (1,2,3,4) - use nc-spam like at ^ and 04:41:981 (1,1,1,1) - ?

1. I found some problems in metdata. Artist : ave;new feat.佐倉紗織 .
2. Add in tags : Enlever 〜アンルヴェ〜 放送紳士ツインマスクR ANCD-1027
   (you can check metdata here and artist here)

1. 01:02:421 (1,5) - Blancket? 01:02:915 (5) - NC? 01:02:833 - You ignore beat, can be make stream?
2. 01:33:740 (4) - You should put NC here if you emphasize the guitar.
3. 01:36:212 (2) - Jump on down bit?
4. 01:49:069 (1,2) - Ok, it's 2014-ish mapping.
5. 02:07:366 (4) - Here must be 1/3.
6. I don't understand by what logic you put NC, sorry.
7. 03:22:860 (1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5) - It is possible to make smoother.
8. 04:02:255 (5) - 04:02:915 (8) - 04:09:673 (11) - 04:12:805 (3) - 04:13:629 (5) - 04:15:442 (2) - 04:20:717 (7) - NC, pls.
9. 05:50:388 - Spiner? end on 05:52:119 - .
10. think you have a big problem with NС. Remove all NC and set them up again.

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[Insane]
01:08:849 - Add a beat. 01:08:685 (3,4) - This term looks 1/2 rhythm, so players could confuse about reading rhythm. it's not obviously confusing pattern to me, there's no beat to be clicked.
01:12:805 (3,2) - avoid overlap
01:43:300 (3,1) - blanket lol how
02:26:981 (6,7,2) - How about make triangle for better looking?
02:38:025 (2) - why this is 4 pointed slider 4 pointed sliders everywhere in my maps.
04:42:311 (1,1) - this notes looks really hard to read, I think this note can be unrankable, avoid stack. I suggest you overlapping. I think this is fine as is, gathering more opinions on this.

GL

Lama Poluna wrote:

hey, Delis

[General]

1. I found some problems in metdata. Artist : ave;new feat.佐倉紗織 .
2. Add in tags : Enlever 〜アンルヴェ〜 放送紳士ツインマスクR ANCD-1027 idk the cd number is really necessary lol
   (you can check metdata here and artist here)

[Insane]

1. 01:02:421 (1,5) - Blancket? 01:02:915 (5) - NC? 01:02:833 - You ignore beat, can be make stream? I didn't do a blanket here because I don't really like blankets with a 1/1 slider. also about new combo, I've put ncs to be fitting with vocals mainly and patterns how it looks on chorus parts so this is okay and.. this triplet fits to emphasize vocals!
2. 01:33:740 (4) - You should put NC here if you emphasize the guitar. if you read the reply above you get how I do put ncs :-) the nc makes the pattern looks nice.
3. 01:36:212 (2) - Jump on down bit?
4. 01:49:069 (1,2) - Ok, it's 2014-ish mapping. this actually looks like 2010 xd I think there was only few ppl to do a pattern like this one in 2k14 lol
5. 02:07:366 (4) - Here must be 1/3. oh this, changed to a circle instead so I'll have no problem with 1/3 snaps anymore ;-; (my another map getting issues about 1/3 snaps, it made me confusing af on 1/3s lol)
6. I don't understand by what logic you put NC, sorry. i hope you understand with my replies
7. 03:22:860 (1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5) - It is possible to make smoother. how ;-; it's one of best patterns for me
8. 04:02:255 (5) - 04:02:915 (8) - 04:09:673 (11) - 04:12:805 (3) - 04:13:629 (5) - 04:15:442 (2) - 04:20:717 (7) - NC, pls. I usually don't like putting ncs on a slider of end of a stream, there's exception but I don't make it in my maps. 04:15:442 (2) - added here though, it's just wrong place to nc hehe
9. 05:50:388 - Spiner? end on 05:52:119 - . this is still nice to play xD
10. think you have a big problem with NС. Remove all NC and set them up again. I don't think it's a issue at all .-. and this is one of my huge problem though, I'm getting sad when people point out that my way of ncing is wrong;

<3 gl

1. 00:42:970 (2,3,4) - I don't know if the slider in the middle is really well placed? The position of this slider 00:43:630 (3) - is pretty strange imo.
2. 00:47:256 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Since the rhythm is always repetitive and same, you should try to keep a balanced DS like x1.45 on each notes. Or, you can do something else that could fit good too, like increasing DS on those two notes 00:47:586 (2,2) - since the beat is quite high pitched.
3. 01:11:652 (5,6,1) - In my opinion, this is pretty anti-flow here, because the move following this slider is pretty sharp and rude, so try to do something on this slider: 01:12:146 (1) - like this: https://puu.sh/tD0R6/737dccde6a.png ?
   Moreover, this pattern is followed by few anti-flow sliders/circles, that kinda break the gameplay and add a weird difficulty.
4. 02:01:762 (5,6,7) - To highlight the speed up, I would suggest you to do something like that: https://puu.sh/tD1mY/4ee9da7551.png
   Here the thing I change here is this:
   • First, I moved the duet down, to keep a constant distance between those notes: 02:01:597 (4,5) - and those notes: 02:01:102 (1,2) - so it could start the highlighting of the build. (song acceleration).
   
   • Then, I increased the distance between those: 02:01:762 (5,6) - since the drums is speeding up again (with drums).
   
   • Finally, I tried to kept a constant distance between those two: 02:01:926 (6,7) - and I did a great jump between those: 02:02:091 (7,1) - to highlight the end of the drums acceleration.
   (I wrote down explanation, so you can understand why I chose this.)
   + I don't really know if the double duet here: 02:01:102 (1,2,3,4) - are necessary, but why not trying after all?
5. 02:07:036 (3) - Why not moving it here up like that: https://puu.sh/tD1Xh/5e259d9157.png so it could do a perfect triangle. By the way, to do a better flow, that would be better if you swap position between those two: 02:06:707 (2,3) -
6. 02:18:245 (1,1,1,1) - I don't feel like the multi-NC here is necessary since it can be misreading with this note: 02:18:410 (1,1) -
7. 02:44:454 (1) - The beat here looks strong, I really like the jump you put here: 02:44:124 (4,5) - but it's so weird with the following slider, since there is a strong beat, but there is no jump, plus it could be good with following a streams.
8. 04:30:442 (1,1,1) - Same here about NC, I don't feel like this is necessary, if it is, please explain me why, that would be interesting! :p
9. 05:50:057 (1,2,3) - Why not giving a stronger jumps, since it's the end of the map with a finisher, so that's strong notes.

Trynna wrote:

hello just got here randomly

1. 01:13:135 (2) - i was expecting a triplet as you did 01:02:586 (2,3,4) -, although the instrumental isn't as strong as before and it actually fits the vocal well, plays better cuz consistency is nice and you did something like this here too 02:29:619 (2,3,4) - yes
2. 01:13:959 (1) - as far as i know you are NCing is based on the sound you are following new section (sometimes instrumental sometimes vocal), but it actually conflicts with 01:03:410 (6) - 01:04:729 (6) - 01:15:278 (5) - and many more. I may be wrong since your NC is weird to undertand but its actually cute well the highest priority of NCing is for how pattern look, the reason why I've put nc here is I don't want to see stacked circles with different combo color
3. 01:18:080 (1) - :thinking: maybe your past combo is just too short to support a new right here ???/// but idk kinda same reason above, it makes jump looks better
4. 01:19:152 (2) - why it would be a thing? i'm pretty sure that 01:19:234 - is as important as 01:19:152 - (even more), i think a triplet would play more natural, but idk, up to you even if the sound is clickable with a triplet, it doesn't really matter as you wouldn't tap it so hard. the flow is like letting cursor stop at slider tail once and going next object quickly, so enough emphasis on it imo
5. 01:20:223 (3,4) - such a small spacing, i think making it bigger would feel better since your mapping is giving some emphasis between sections. sounds like the slider tail here 01:20:223 (3) - gets really weak, witch makes 01:20:718 (4) - feels like some kind of "new section" (even when it isn't) yes
6. 01:30:608 (4) - feels like when this sound is really strong (01:38:519 (1,1,1) -) you just NCed it, but it sounds like here is one of these "really strong" parts. Also if you don't NC any of these 01:30:608 (4,5,6) - your section will looks really long. Same about 01:27:476 (4) -. The only section i understand why you choosed to make longer is 01:32:751 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - actually yeah forgot to
7. 02:07:696 (1,2,3) - maybe the movement can be improved a bit by rotating 02:08:190 (3) - a bit more, it would make 02:08:685 (4) - easier and natural to catch tho i think this is okay as is
8. 02:12:641 (1,2) - idk making these sounds as jumpy as 02:12:970 (3,4) - feels weird imo, i literally can't feel a thing hitting 02:12:970 (3) - cuz well, no impact is given when you do something like this um? I think there's enoughly strong sound to be jumpy like this one.
9. 02:14:948 - note missing? i don't think a break here sounds nice/plays nice in any way rip added
10. 02:39:838 (6) - nc would be nice, just to split the combo tho this is okay
11. 03:01:432 (1,2,3) - something like this looks just weird to your mapping, you rarely put 2 triplet so close to each other like this 03:00:937 (4,5,6) - 03:01:432 (1,2,3) -. I was just expecting you to follow the vocal as you did a couple times making this sounds really weird, idk I'd like to change this but need an idea
12. 03:11:981 (1) - :thinking: NC here would be kind of useless since 2 combo but to fix it would be nice to move to 03:11:652 (3) - since the heavy sound happens here as 03:10:992 (1) - ok
13. 03:57:476 (1) - idk maybe this is just ??? to ignore the stream and then follow it here 03:59:206 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - just to emphasize a sound that would receive some emphasis making a stream from 03:58:300 - done
14. 04:15:112 (6,7,1) - flows really really weird imo it's fine maybe
15. 04:19:893 (3,1) - you usually don't split streams like this changed

I couldn't be a nice modder in 2010 for sure wat you would be able to be a nice modder in 2014 tho

Pachiru wrote:

[cqfd]

1. 00:42:970 (2,3,4) - I don't know if the slider in the middle is really well placed? The position of this slider 00:43:630 (3) - is pretty strange imo. I feel nothing wrong with this
2. 00:47:256 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Since the rhythm is always repetitive and same, you should try to keep a balanced DS like x1.45 on each notes. Or, you can do something else that could fit good too, like increasing DS on those two notes 00:47:586 (2,2) - since the beat is quite high pitched. sorry to say but I don't use DS for any 1/2 pattern in Insane or higher difficulties. and making them separate with the patterns isn't really nice idea to break the pattern I've done here on the reason you provided.
3. 01:11:652 (5,6,1) - In my opinion, this is pretty anti-flow here, because the move following this slider is pretty sharp and rude, so try to do something on this slider: 01:12:146 (1) - like this: https://puu.sh/tD0R6/737dccde6a.png ?
   Moreover, this pattern is followed by few anti-flow sliders/circles, that kinda break the gameplay and add a weird difficulty. changed the pattern before so now it's okay i guess
4. 02:01:762 (5,6,7) - To highlight the speed up, I would suggest you to do something like that: https://puu.sh/tD1mY/4ee9da7551.png my apologies, I simply don't like your pattern.. ;-;
   Here the thing I change here is this:
   • First, I moved the duet down, to keep a constant distance between those notes: 02:01:597 (4,5) - and those notes: 02:01:102 (1,2) - so it could start the highlighting of the build. (song acceleration).
   
   • Then, I increased the distance between those: 02:01:762 (5,6) - since the drums is speeding up again (with drums).
   
   • Finally, I tried to kept a constant distance between those two: 02:01:926 (6,7) - and I did a great jump between those: 02:02:091 (7,1) - to highlight the end of the drums acceleration.
   (I wrote down explanation, so you can understand why I chose this.)
   + I don't really know if the double duet here: 02:01:102 (1,2,3,4) - are necessary, but why not trying after all?
5. 02:07:036 (3) - Why not moving it here up like that: https://puu.sh/tD1Xh/5e259d9157.png so it could do a perfect triangle. By the way, to do a better flow, that would be better if you swap position between those two: 02:06:707 (2,3) - I prefer this as is though, this pattern got a nice flow which is natural and plays very comfy.
6. 02:18:245 (1,1,1,1) - I don't feel like the multi-NC here is necessary since it can be misreading with this note: 02:18:410 (1,1) - well this was for consistency stuff but try to remove this and let's see if nobody points out.
7. 02:44:454 (1) - The beat here looks strong, I really like the jump you put here: 02:44:124 (4,5) - but it's so weird with the following slider, since there is a strong beat, but there is no jump, plus it could be good with following a streams. ANTI-JUMP for emphasis.
8. 04:30:442 (1,1,1) - Same here about NC, I don't feel like this is necessary, if it is, please explain me why, that would be interesting! :p here because 1/3 snaps are usually followed by sliders in the map but this, so the ncs help your reading ability a lot (at least you wouldn't assume them as 1/2 circles)
9. 05:50:057 (1,2,3) - Why not giving a stronger jumps, since it's the end of the map with a finisher, so that's strong notes. apparently, not in my map :O I wanted this section to be going small like i did here.

That's all for me, hope this'll help you, I just don't use to mod high SR diff!
Very good work with hitsounds. I'm sorry I did a quite fast mod, I didn't checked metadata, files, timing points, and stuffs. But if you really need this, ask me and I'll do this unless you're sure that everything is alrighty!

Good luck for it~

Faust wrote:

2014 mapping is good.

Dailycare wrote:

To gomi wtf...

[General]
*00:39:838 - You can remove this green line. yup

[Insane]
*01:02:586 (2,3,4) - For avoiding an overlap, what about moving them to around (152, 338)? this overlapping is intentional to make it the best position to aim;
*01:25:663 (2,3) - They start at red ticks but 01:31:102 (2) - starts at a white tick. I think the latter is more better than the former. And if you just want to keep the dense rhythm, then what about this? good idea
*01:40:251 (2) - Overmapped. But tbh I don't care about it. Just I want to let you know it. okie remade this to a jump
*02:18:245 (1,2,3,4) - Could you make their ends a bit quiet? okay now
*02:32:009 - There's obviously no sound hm.. tru
*02:33:410 (5,6,7,8) - The pattern is pretty solid. But I would make them having more distant spacing if I adjusted it. did at x1.2

There's no issues for me after the break. A pretty nice work, I love it xd no gay

Yohanes wrote:

Hi avmidfvurtrtdrk! who are you talking to?

lolInsane
Wow, so many old sliders find a new slider for rewards.
- 01:08:676 (3,4) - It's not very clear that these are rhytmically separated by 1/1, especially because previously 01:07:357 (2,3) - is 1/2 jump yet, it have bigger spacing. In addition, it seems like in any other places you usually stack 1/1 circle. So I think it would be better if you could stack them or make the spacing even bigger I feel this not really problem here but increased the spacing a bit
- 01:18:731 (1,2,3) - I find it more intuitive to play if you change the rhythm into something like this http://puu.sh/tGyMp/be82d1caaf.jpg probably because I'm not a big fan of 1/4 slider lol I'm spamming 1/4s in this map xDD I actually think this fits good
- 01:35:873 (1,2) - This spacing is way too big imo this is okay, it's not really a huge jump in playing.
- 01:49:884 (3) - It makes more sense to start the slider / circle here 01:50:049 - because on (3) head there're barely any significant sound. But I personally would put a 1/1 slider there because the "hole" there feels awkward http://puu.sh/tGxOJ/10961bfa52.jpg nice catch
- 02:01:753 (5,6) - how about ctrl+g this to spice things up a little bit 02:01:753 (5,6,7) - did ctrl+g them because I didn't want map a jump like yours here, now this should be better for an emphasis etc
- 02:12:796 (2,3,4) - Sound at 3-4 is subjectively weaker compared with 2-3, but they have the same spacing. How about moving 02:13:126 (4) - to make the vocal sound stand out even more? Probably something like this http://puu.sh/tGyaP/f4fdb4d89a.jpg hm ok
- 02:31:753 (5) - Ctrl+G this will create better flow imo that's very nice but I'd keep current pattern here
- 02:32:577 (3) - Place jump here? The finish sound is strong that's why I made a straight jump to emphasize the sound
- 02:34:967 - There're drum sound here, so I think it would be better if you connect previous pattern to the triplets, or change the rhythm into something like this http://puu.sh/tGD5T/1b195cc480.jpg k
- 02:52:687 (4,5,6) - Just suggestion, but how about change those into 1/2 slider? It will complement the vocal nicely & make the spacing clearer as well note : 02:57:961 (2,3,4) - here too prefer mine ;-;
- 04:30:654 - There're no sound here, so maybe remove it? I know this would be a problem, I still consider what I should do here. if I removed the circle it plays really weird.. maybe will ask somebody
- 04:47:082 - Since the vocal is really prominent here, start the slider head here would be a better idea. Make it into comething like http://puu.sh/tGDK7/8d3b708f2f.jpg or so this fits to the piano well, I think the vocals too
- 05:05:544 (4,5,6) - How about this? I think it works well both rhytmically and playability-wise http://puu.sh/tGDPt/e19242d2b4.jpg nice one!

It always difficult modding japanese mapper's map lol
Hope it helps a bit
Good luck!

VINXIS wrote:

AVE NEW ADVENTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

joker- wrote:

少し遅くなって申し訳ございません

Insane

1. Unused hitsounds: soft-sliderslide2.wav らしいです。あら、消しました。
2. 完全にnaziですが、For Appの譜面ならDiff nameを普通にInsaneではなくて何か曲にあっているものに変えてみた方が面白いとおもいました nazi modsというのは、恐らく変えた所で何一つ変化が無いような事の変更を半ば強制させる、という意味だと私個人は考えてるのでnaziでは無いですよ！(例としては、blanket modですね。とても下手くそなblanketじゃない限りplayingで気づく事は無いと思います。つまり変更する意味が無いので)ただ、何一つdifficulty nameが思いつかず手詰まりしてますが・・・ｗ
3. 01:00:434 (5) - NC入れてはいかがでしょうか、このパートは2 mesureごとにNCが入ってるので入れたほうが自然かと思いました。 基本的には、break前のobject1つだけの為にNCは入れない事にしてるんですが、break前では無い上にかつ配置と合いそうなので入れてみました。
4. 01:02:082 (2) - 01:01:752 - ここからSVも大きく変わって疾走感が出てるのに合わせて、スライダーエンドにstackさせないほうがいいと思いました。ここは、1回スライダーの尻尾部分でAIMを止めさせてから、01:02:412 (1,2,3,4) - にて加速させるという意図で配置してみたのでこのままが好きです。スタックさせない場合、スライダーからそのまま流れていくようなAIMになってしまうので、それを避ける為です。
5. 01:26:643 (6) - NC入れてみてはいかがでしょう、01:31:917 (1) - ここと合わせたほうがきれいだと思ったのが理由です。それと、01:26:807 - ここの音を拾ってもいいかと思います、ここ以外はちゃんとこの音を拾っているのでそのほうがいいと思いました。確かに、あと若干長いですね.. NC入れました。音取りの方なんですが、1/1を崩してしまうとここで作りたかった流れ、配置が無くなってしまうので少し考えさせてください！前向きに考えてみます。

たいしたこと書けなくてすいません。。。SP稼ぎに使ってください
Good Luck!

1. 03:09:665 (1) - isn't this linear already? might wanna remove that anchor though
2. 03:22:851 (1,1,1) - uhh what's the reason using this NC though .-.
3. 04:09:500 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - clean up the streams pal~ xd
4. 04:42:137 (1,1,1) - round 2: NCs again
5. 04:53:676 - why no note here? feels empty tbh
6. 05:50:379 - u could use a spinner or a slider art stuff from the guitar till 05:52:068 - if u want

lit120 wrote:

[nice diff name xd]

1. 03:09:665 (1) - isn't this linear already? might wanna remove that anchor though doesn't matter at all lmao how did you even find it
2. 03:22:851 (1,1,1) - uhh what's the reason using this NC though .-. they look pretty
3. 04:09:500 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - clean up the streams pal~ xd tried
4. 04:42:137 (1,1,1) - round 2: NCs again no, they need to read the pattern properly
5. 04:53:676 - why no note here? feels empty tbh addde
6. 05:50:379 - u could use a spinner or a slider art stuff from the guitar till 05:52:068 - if u want nope, it doesn't fit and slider arts are shit but jonathanlfj's ones.

sliders like 01:05:544 (2) - 04:25:983 (1) - 03:08:840 (2) - etc needs to clean up here :^)

jk jk, i know that kind of sliders and i know where it came from xd

interesting...

Osu Tatakae Ouendan wrote:

*looks above*
oh crud a BN post
Hope I'm not too late? Should've posted sooner I already started a few days ago but stuff happens.
Wanted to mod the marathon maps last, aside from having to mod 9 other maps, and that real life activities got pushed into one week due to rains that nearly flooded the city

from World's Largest M4M queue .^.

('w') well this style brings memories. I think it's closer to 2012 and 2013 than 2014 map description modded
OHHHH OLD SLIDER ALGORITHM I MISSED THOSE QuQ
I miss maps like this QuQ
There's no fundamental error so I'm not sure I can point out a lot.
[eNLeveR]
00:53:840 (1,2,3,4) - This is nitpicky and not necessary, but could you make these same spacing? Most of this portion has some pretty stable spacing (same spacing on individual patterns and mostly similar spacing across patterns) but here you suddenly have them at different spacings. I've made the distance larger between (2) and (3) for the strong sound which is like soft whistle, and (3) (4) for the high vocal pitch. and another reason why I ruined spacing here is it plays somehow weird. dw 00:54:500 (3,4,1) - has same distance!
01:08:181 (2) - I think you oughtta move it farther away like this http://puu.sh/tYctD/8ec2e64b12.jpg considering the spacing in the rest of this map: most of the 1/2s, even if they're short spacing, don't have spacing this small. alright
01:24:170 (1,2,3,4) - Not sure what to do with this either, but I think you oughtta make them the same spacing from each other? That or 01:24:170 (2) - should be further spaced from 01:24:170 (1) - and same for 3,4 I like having a variety against other 1/3s
01:44:280 (2) - I think you should move this further from 01:43:785 (1) - to help conserve momentum. It doesn't have to be too far. http://puu.sh/tYcHM/835b406f0d.jpg imo it's fine as is
01:59:610 (4) - you know, you could probably make this a jump: http://puu.sh/tYcNM/3677f93dde.jpg Might give this part some emphasis as well as help make the movement to 02:00:104 (5) - make a bit more natural wow catchy
02:07:357 (4) - I feel this should be the same spacing as 02:06:368 (1,2,3) - I did this on purpose because the sound is really weaker compared with the sliders
02:43:456 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think this is better: http://puu.sh/tYd7p/190844e056.jpg guitars ToTb
03:14:774 (2,1) - I find the sudden lack of spacing weird, especially considering this is a new phrasing and it's a 1/1 slider. I think it would help to space (2) from 1 to add emphasis and so that the 1/1 slider doesn't feel as empty. tried
03:46:588 (6) - similar to 02:07:357 (4) - well nowehere to place this time i know there's a finish so this could've been given some emphasis, although music goes to quiet part so this also works fine as is, idk
03:57:879 (2) - I know it might look a little crowded, but perhaps this can be moved closer to 03:57:467 (1) - ? You have similar spacings elsewhere for 1/2's so I think it's better to make it clearer this is 1/4 away. Something similar to the spacing at 03:57:879 (2,3) - would be nice changed
04:30:434 (1,1,1) - To be honest perhaps you should ask for some opinions on this, I think it's a little too sudden in the sense that there aren't any 1/3rds in the previous parts, but then again the NC's are there for readability. Not sure I've asked mappers to playtest this map and everyone passed it smoothly so probably fine
04:49:720 (3,4) - Are you trying to map to the piano at (4)? I think you should just stick to vocals instead, as most of the map follows a clear rhythm: either very clearly on instruments or vocals, and rarely (I think never) a mix of both in one phrasing. this is because the piano is loud af if I ignored the piano, shhh
04:56:313 (1,2,3,4,5) - same here: i think the rhythm isn't clear. Perhaps you should map to vocals instead?: http://puu.sh/tYrKv/05db494bb1.jpg well I pretty sure agreed, but this is concerned for the climax of the part. I really need another opinion on this to avoid mapping it hard but correct rhythm.

Hope this helps (/w\) ya

You specced me once while I was playing Rubik's Cube, so I remember your name.
Loved my old avatar too but my current one is more powerful isn't it. how the fuck do you still remember what you were playing back then lmao. your current ava is so far cute than anything you've used as avatar before, like you look not very mysterious person rn lol
also didn't expect you were friendly person lmao.

1. 01:32:247 - i heard drum here add clap?
2. 01:49:720 (3) - idk there's slow 1/2 sound there >< so probably add a 1/2 slider or 2 1/2 circles on 01:49:884 - ?
3. 02:29:280 (3) - add whistle to complete the bell sound?
4. 02:31:258 (4) - i think u can add finish here because there's loud drum here because u added finish here 02:32:577 (3) - and they have similar sound so;;
5. 02:45:763 (4) - idk i prefer to click this rather than make this slider to support the loud bell and jump pattern but yea;
6. 02:57:961 (2) - i think remove the clap is better, just let it on drum sample
7. 03:14:939 (1) - this anti-jump idk somehow kinda break the jump pattern, i think since it leads to new vocal sound, place this one a lil bit far? maybe like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 05:05:544 (4) - this too i guess, i think u can move this a lil bit far cuz the music is supporting it too, perhaps like this? the rhythm is the same like 05:09:500 - part too so i guess add jump here would be good;;;
   
   SPOILER

   

1. soft-hitfinish3.wav is unreasonably large (1.6M) and have a rather long while redundant fade-out. So I shorten the fade-out and remake the file: hitsound. Please replace the old file to this new one.
2. no kiai time?
3. 00:53:181 (3,4,1) - not distinguishable distance for 1/4 rhythm when followed by the 1/2 movement 00:53:840 (1,2) - . They share quite similar distance but completely different rhythm
4. 00:55:654 (2,3) - Yeah I prefer this movement larger, for the same reason above
5. 01:05:049 (7,2) - not really overlap but they still touch each other, which is bad looking. Just move any one aside by a bit.
6. There are some beats that I think should be emphasized by distance, most of which are the slider head of 1/1 sliders with strong beat or strong vocal
   
   open this

   1. 01:07:851 (1,2) - 1.05x is barely enough compared to normal movement in this part. Adjust distance in this part
   2. 02:32:247 (1,2,3) - My suggestion is to swap 1 and 2 to gain distance on 2->3. But in this way would somewhat break the flow. So you should probably find another solution
   3. 02:36:533 (3,4) - I admit the beat on 4 isn't really strong, but still stronger compared to 02:36:203 (1,2,3) - since 4 is on stanza. My suggestion is to curve 02:36:698 (4) - like this
   4. 02:44:280 (5,1) - heavy beat is underspaced.
   5. 02:46:093 (5) - it should more likely to stack with 02:45:434 (2) - for the same reason
   6. 03:14:774 (2,1) - move it to 154,165?
   7. 03:36:862 (1,2) - same issue. Multiple solutions are available. You may change 03:36:862 (1) - to a mostly vertical slider, or change the position of 03:37:192 (2) - , etc.
   8. 05:14:610 (3,1) - significantly too small distance compared to how you jump large on 05:14:280 (1,2,3) -
7. 01:19:143 (2) - just a random triplet slider :/ I don't see it across the whole difficulty except this one. So to keep consistency, make it two circles
8. 01:22:522 (1,2,3,4) - why you would like to use small distance when emphasizing a part? :s For me this part is heavy and you use two whistles on 01:22:522 (1,4) - to prove this. I think you may move 01:22:687 (2) - to 482,224 and move 01:22:851 (3) - to 470,96
9. 03:58:291 (3,1) - HARD to read I have to say. I can understand that the turning up pitch in music here makes you want to start to tap circles. But you should also notice that the music here is really weird. So basically I prefer making 03:58:703 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - this stream combined by sliders with 1~3 extra circle(s) so that the rhythm here can be clearly readable. You may argue that it is fully passable and fc-able for many players. But since it would definitely confuse many players (even someone who can easily pass it like me), why not change it?
10. 04:41:972 (1,1,1,1) - not sure if it is against RC because sliderbody of 04:42:302 (1,1) - is completely covered for most time appearing on the screen. You'd better not have these stacks.
11. 05:50:544 - you can add a spinner till 05:52:027 -

10nya wrote:

just a fan passing by

[diff name]

1. 01:32:247 - i heard drum here add clap? ya!
2. 01:49:720 (3) - idk there's slow 1/2 sound there >< so probably add a 1/2 slider or 2 1/2 circles on 01:49:884 - ? gave a try here
3. 02:29:280 (3) - add whistle to complete the bell sound? yes
4. 02:31:258 (4) - i think u can add finish here because there's loud drum here because u added finish here 02:32:577 (3) - and they have similar sound so;; right
5. 02:45:763 (4) - idk i prefer to click this rather than make this slider to support the loud bell and jump pattern but yea; didn't want a circle at 02:45:928 -
6. 02:57:961 (2) - i think remove the clap is better, just let it on drum sample only drum sample feels a bit weak for the actual drum on music
7. 03:14:939 (1) - this anti-jump idk somehow kinda break the jump pattern, i think since it leads to new vocal sound, place this one a lil bit far? maybe like this? made spacing larger while keeping how it flows
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 05:05:544 (4) - this too i guess, i think u can move this a lil bit far cuz the music is supporting it too, perhaps like this? the rhythm is the same like 05:09:500 - part too so i guess add jump here would be good;;; but this currently fits to vocals very well;
   
   SPOILER

   

でりしゃのマップが大好き

F D Flourite wrote:

pretty nice flow and good hitsound, but have some issues regarding distance

[eNLeveR]

1. soft-hitfinish3.wav is unreasonably large (1.6M) and have a rather long while redundant fade-out. So I shorten the fade-out and remake the file: hitsound. Please replace the old file to this new one. nice
2. no kiai time? ya, only kiai flashes are enough as circles keep flashing is too much for me lol
3. 00:53:181 (3,4,1) - not distinguishable distance for 1/4 rhythm when followed by the 1/2 movement 00:53:840 (1,2) - . They share quite similar distance but completely different rhythm
4. 00:55:654 (2,3) - Yeah I prefer this movement larger, for the same reason above tried to change both
5. 01:05:049 (7,2) - not really overlap but they still touch each other, which is bad looking. Just move any one aside by a bit. k
6. There are some beats that I think should be emphasized by distance, most of which are the slider head of 1/1 sliders with strong beat or strong vocal
   
   open this

   1. 01:07:851 (1,2) - 1.05x is barely enough compared to normal movement in this part. Adjust distance in this part ._. x1.2
   2. 02:32:247 (1,2,3) - My suggestion is to swap 1 and 2 to gain distance on 2->3. But in this way would somewhat break the flow. So you should probably find another solution the flow itself already gives enough emphasis here
   3. 02:36:533 (3,4) - I admit the beat on 4 isn't really strong, but still stronger compared to 02:36:203 (1,2,3) - since 4 is on stanza. My suggestion is to curve 02:36:698 (4) - like this anti-jump is one of way to emphasis patterns
   4. 02:44:280 (5,1) - heavy beat is underspaced. should be ok now
   5. 02:46:093 (5) - it should more likely to stack with 02:45:434 (2) - for the same reason ya
   6. 03:14:774 (2,1) - move it to 154,165? gave this a bit more emphasis by 10nya mod
   7. 03:36:862 (1,2) - same issue. Multiple solutions are available. You may change 03:36:862 (1) - to a mostly vertical slider, or change the position of 03:37:192 (2) - , etc. done
   8. 05:14:610 (3,1) - significantly too small distance compared to how you jump large on 05:14:280 (1,2,3) - anti-jump stuff, made them closer to emphasis how it plays actually.
7. 01:19:143 (2) - just a random triplet slider :/ I don't see it across the whole difficulty except this one. So to keep consistency, make it two circles I prefer this tho :v
8. 01:22:522 (1,2,3,4) - why you would like to use small distance when emphasizing a part? :s For me this part is heavy and you use two whistles on 01:22:522 (1,4) - to prove this. I think you may move 01:22:687 (2) - to 482,224 and move 01:22:851 (3) - to 470,96 ya
9. 03:58:291 (3,1) - HARD to read I have to say. I can understand that the turning up pitch in music here makes you want to start to tap circles. But you should also notice that the music here is really weird. So basically I prefer making 03:58:703 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - this stream combined by sliders with 1~3 extra circle(s) so that the rhythm here can be clearly readable. You may argue that it is fully passable and fc-able for many players. But since it would definitely confuse many players (even someone who can easily pass it like me), why not change it? tried to make it easier
10. 04:41:972 (1,1,1,1) - not sure if it is against RC because sliderbody of 04:42:302 (1,1) - is completely covered for most time appearing on the screen. You'd better not have these stacks. but it fits the music really nice, maybe getting one more opinion from somebody else
11. 05:50:544 - you can add a spinner till 05:52:027 - not a fan of it :c

I'm not really ok with the NC management because NC for pattern&reading is not the essential idea of placing NCs imo. Now you just NC for 2/1 or 4/1 beats "randomly" from rhythm aspect. So I won't directly give any icon now. You can find me after you get the first bubble tho. You'd better not find me for heart because there will be something changing regarding BNs in the near future.

1. There are still some NC issues unsolved.
   
   details

   1. Some of which are designed intentionally on the second white line, like 01:28:785 (1) - , 01:30:104 (1) - ,etc. For me, these kind of beats can be emphasized but you may pay more than they deserve when you keep setting NCs because eventually there will be 2 NCs in one music section (4/1 beat), which doesn't really fit a 4/4 song. So, I agree on some of them while not on others. And I list some of them below.
   2. 01:02:412 (1) - not needing an NC here
   3. 01:18:071 (1) - remove NC
   4. 02:12:961 (3,1) - swap NC
   5. 02:39:994 (1) - even tho there is a long vocal, combo start from here is too short because you soon NC for the instrument start at 02:40:654 (1) - . So this NC can be removed
   6. 02:49:555 (1) - remove NC
   7. 03:06:368 (1) - remove NC
   8. 03:11:643 (1) - remove NC
   9. 03:14:610 (1,2) - don't think only 2 circles would need an NC here. the clap at 03:14:610 (1) - is just a normal emphasis. So you should probably remove the NC
   10. 03:18:731 (5) - add NC
   11. 03:25:983 (1) - remove NC
   12. 03:34:060 (1) - remove NC
   13. 03:45:104 (1,2) - you should probably swap NC because the 1/3 rhythms starts at slider 2. If you don't like NC on stacks, you may remove the stack at the same time
   14. 04:12:302 (1) - remove NC
   15. 04:27:467 (4) - add NC
   16. 04:36:368 (1) - remove NC
   17. 05:09:005 (1) - remove NC
   18. 05:01:588 (1,2,1,2) - your NC arrangement here is not consistent with your rhythm. You make a 1/1 break in the same combo 05:01:588 (1,2) - while a 1/2 break between different combos 05:01:917 (2,1) - . It is really confusing. One solution is to remove NC at 05:02:082 (1) - .
2. 01:02:082 (2,2,3,4) - and overlap is not good looking. slightly move 01:02:577 (2,3,4) - leftward
3. 02:53:181 - a strong drum is missed
4. 03:07:027 (1) - slidertail here doesn't fit the song. You may mute the slidertail or change it into a 1/2 slider.
5. 05:19:720 (1,2) - suggest you make it a 1/4 slider. Because 6-length intro stream is not a common setting. Since it is also not emphasized in hitsound, making it a 1/4 slider will make the music structure more clear.

Sonnyc wrote:

?!