hi
from my queue:
i think this map can be improved aesthetically:
like these 00:02:124 (1,2) - can be parallel
00:12:555 - this slider end shud be muted
00:24:488 (1) - ^
00:27:215 (2,3) - whats happening with this spacing? u shud keep the pattern here, emphasis isnt that needed in such places
i think this spinner shud be ending here 02:26:351 -
by rc, spinners shudnt be longer than 10 sec, and i dont really see any strong reason here to keep it that long
that leads u to the point where u shud map a slider art from here 02:26:601 -
which makes sense, cuz this break is too long (till the 03:25:860 - ) almost 1 minute
which isnt that rankable uh? there are really good sounds and melody to map a slider art
02:26:601 -
02:28:851 -
02:30:601 - etc
in a current state its a mistake
03:33:360 (3,4,5,6,7) - this flow pattern isnt that nice i wud say, the 03:33:860 - is a strong sound that shud have emphasis (higher ds)
and this transition 03:34:110 (6,7) - isnt that logical i wud say, tho its a my personal preference
well this break is nice 03:34:110 (6,7) - it makes a bit of sense here at least
05:16:850 (1,2,3) - i dont like these hitsounds, they are too loud here. fix the volume
06:05:771 (1,2,1) - uh spacing? why is it that high?
06:07:211 (2,1,2) - ^
06:09:131 (1,2) - ^ etc
06:18:251 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ i mean, wow... how is that justified? the song is calm here
yea there are coming spaced stream next up, i dont understand why did u do that
u just forcing the SR to be higher than it shud be
how u would imagine someone playing this with HR?
07:34:168 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - the entire pattern is wrong, because the intensity is decreasing, u just keep the same spacing for no reason here
07:59:608 (1) - lol maybe it shud be like that?
http://puu.sh/viQh6/1743da4f35.jpg
alright thats it
take care
from my queue:
i think this map can be improved aesthetically:
like these 00:02:124 (1,2) - can be parallel
00:12:555 - this slider end shud be muted
00:24:488 (1) - ^
00:27:215 (2,3) - whats happening with this spacing? u shud keep the pattern here, emphasis isnt that needed in such places
i think this spinner shud be ending here 02:26:351 -
by rc, spinners shudnt be longer than 10 sec, and i dont really see any strong reason here to keep it that long
that leads u to the point where u shud map a slider art from here 02:26:601 -
which makes sense, cuz this break is too long (till the 03:25:860 - ) almost 1 minute
which isnt that rankable uh? there are really good sounds and melody to map a slider art
02:26:601 -
02:28:851 -
02:30:601 - etc
in a current state its a mistake
03:33:360 (3,4,5,6,7) - this flow pattern isnt that nice i wud say, the 03:33:860 - is a strong sound that shud have emphasis (higher ds)
and this transition 03:34:110 (6,7) - isnt that logical i wud say, tho its a my personal preference
well this break is nice 03:34:110 (6,7) - it makes a bit of sense here at least
05:16:850 (1,2,3) - i dont like these hitsounds, they are too loud here. fix the volume
06:05:771 (1,2,1) - uh spacing? why is it that high?
06:07:211 (2,1,2) - ^
06:09:131 (1,2) - ^ etc
06:18:251 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ i mean, wow... how is that justified? the song is calm here
yea there are coming spaced stream next up, i dont understand why did u do that
u just forcing the SR to be higher than it shud be
how u would imagine someone playing this with HR?
07:34:168 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - the entire pattern is wrong, because the intensity is decreasing, u just keep the same spacing for no reason here
07:59:608 (1) - lol maybe it shud be like that?
http://puu.sh/viQh6/1743da4f35.jpg
alright thats it
take care