Thanks
VINXIS wrote:
extra
top right of the grid feels lonely
00:14:526 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - why do this when u can make this part good and not random nonconttextual back n forths :/ wat do u meeean?
00:44:845 (1,3) - sudnt the ncing be switched
01:08:143 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - thuis is the best pattern int he diff thx Xd
01:20:271 (3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - this shits CANCR 2 read cuz of how u stack the circles lik tht and how thers a 1/2 space for the first 1 but 1/1 space for the next 2 lol hmm idk rn ill think about how to fix this
Easy
is this the monstrata collab cuz its bad LUL CxXXXXXXx yeh it's the collab with only my parts looo
blissy
blissfulyoshi wrote:
Mini mod of 1 diff
Please add video
Why does the mp3 have an average bitrate of 124kbps? Please change it.
Extra:
Reading this diff was a nightmare for me, so I don't know what to say
00:06:707 (7,1) - why did you switch from clockwise to an ugly back and forth overlap? idk, i think it's alright
00:15:803 (1,2) - why did the spacing shrink to nothing? I know the music is slower, but not that much slower (pretty much same can be said for most of this intro section)
00:20:909 (1,2) - why is there an overlap here. Place 2 further please for aesthetic sake oh this is on purpose
00:27:292 (1,2) - why is the spacing between these sliders so small? While I do see it is a quarter note difference, it is a slider, so you sort of expect a jump afterward
00:33:675 (1,2,3) - why is this effectively a stack? There is stress on 3, so it does not fit the music the 1/1 stack emphasizes the last note tho?
00:46:441 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - is there a reason you switch from back and forth to counterclockwise? It is semi confusing to play i kinda split it into 2 parts, 00:46:441 (1,2,3,4) - the rhythm kinda repeats itself, then 00:47:079 (5,6,7,8) - is more continuous
00:47:718 (1,2,3) - And then why switch to counterclockwise to add more confusion? i guess i do it cuz too much circular flow isnt fun + it emphasizes a change
00:53:622 (5) - because of the previous clockwise pattern and the fact that 4 is moving leftward, I wouldn't think of going rightward to hit this note
01:04:154 (1,2,3,4) - isn't this a bit too easy in comparison to everything after it. The music doesn't change that much its not supposed to be hard so ya
01:08:781 (4,5) - this jump felt really small in comparison to similar sounds around it, so I kept overjumping it
01:10:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It is pretty amazing that you went from CCW to back and forth to CW. It is a challenge to read since nothing really moves in a predictable pattern same reasoning as above with the repeating / continuous flow i guess
01:15:643 (7,1,2,3) - you have a great CCW pattern going and then suddenly changing it which confuses me same? maybe ill change this later
01:24:739 (1,2,3,4) - Does this really deserve this little spacing? ya the stack to build up on the next set of patterns
I don't know what to say about this diff. The circles just aren't very predictable forcing me to scan more of the screen than I normally do for a fairly consistent musical phrase. Toss in the messy overlaps, and well I just suffer. I'll leave it up to you to decide what you want to change and what you don't. i tried x ....x thx for the imput tho blissy
Hanazawa Kana
Hanazawa Kana wrote:
抱歉来晚
[Hard]
00:04:313 (1,2,3,4) - 这里我觉得如果你想要强调00:04:313 - 这个音的话 后面那几个类似的音也要clickable吧 现在这样感觉打起来会感觉比较奇怪...要不就是这个1删掉把前面的折返拉长一节吧 全都triple 有點太難 x.x 所以為了diff我還是留吧
00:31:441 - 和后面一样也放单点? 對reverse感覺不錯所以 aa 你說得有道理所以我會想想 w
[Insane]
00:03:835 - 到00:05:590 - 我打的时候感觉这部分会有点卡手 我认为可能是00:03:835 (2,1,2) - 这里开始就卡 到后面就不知道用那个手点了.. 我的建议是这里要不就这个00:03:835 (2) - 删掉 因为这个音相对后面的那几个鼓来说太轻了... 如果你不想改的话 这里把它和后面的短滑条放近一点感觉也会好打很多
00:16:281 (2) - 00:21:388 - 这两处感觉有点空的啊 可以考虑来个3/2滑条? 故意只跟鼓的
00:45:643 (4,5) - 这个有点卡手..要不和前面那个一样后面接三连? 覺得還可以吧。再想想
[Extra]
pp图啊. 那我就把我打着不舒服的地方提一下吧
00:03:835 - 我还是觉得这里的5连影响手感呢...说不上来的感觉 要不减点音量 或者换成1/4滑条什么的?
00:14:686 (2,4,6) - 这里都叠在一起不是很好打 我感觉稍微上下错开一点会好很多
00:36:069 (4) - 这里挺容易断的 我觉得要不就离后面的大滑条近一点? 感覺還好
00:47:079 (5,6) - 突然间距就变小了 这种角度也不太好打 我自己稍微调了一下 你看看这样会不会好一些? 00:47:079 (5) - (436,224),00:47:239 (6) - (171,179),00:47:398 (7) - (372,358)
改完後SR 又提高了 LOL
GD我看了下好像都挺稳的 就不水了主要是我英语有点菜w
哦对了那个Easy是什么鬼..5.84的ez easy 簡稱 easy pp /閃
加油 謝謝!! 沒講的都改摟
Del05
Del05 wrote:
Hi
Sorry if it is not very helpful xD
no kds if not helpful
This map is good and what i can just find any minor issue xD
i cant find about the metadata (song title using tv size or not) xD (cant find the album or single too)
and here is the video --> size 15.1 MB or size 16.8 MB[Hard]
- 00:00:484 - 00:03:675 - why not map the guitar sound ? (idk what it is actually lol XD) other diff map it (just your hard insane and extra not map it) i think map it to make it consistent with easy(and even your easy troll diff) and normal diff hm i did this to emphasize the drums so yeah
- 00:08:462 (2,3) - why you use jump here you dont use it at other part like 00:05:909 (2,3) - 00:11:015 (2,3) -
- 00:32:877 (6) - blanket 00:33:675 (1) - tail ??
- 00:17:558 (3,3) - add some jump ? for emphasize the sound calm part so its ok
- 00:21:547 (2) - hm.. change it to 1/1 slider then add circle 00:22:026 ?? bcause vocal here 00:21:866 i ignore vocals :p
- 00:42:452 (5) - make it same like 00:41:813 (3,7) - ? i think its ok
- 00:48:835 (1,2) - make it same with 00:38:781 (1,2) - cause actually it is same rhythm and same melody on vocal too (different lyric) aa ur right but i mapped it differently to stress the vocals more on this section x .x ill see what to do about it later with more mods
thanks for modding everyone! no reply are fixed! ^^/