forum
bradbreeck - Step Off Playa
posted
Total Posts
74
step of playaaaaaaaaaA r M i N wrote:
step of foooooooooooool
you ain't nooooooothing
you ain't coooooool
And I'm gonna crush your business cause I'm old schooooool
Skoro ReFaller dał bubla to ja kwalifikuje
Easy.
00:26:106 - Since the instrument ends here, the music of 00:24:392 (1,2) wasn't exactly the same. Expressing those difference as a same 2/1 slider didn't felt to be reflecting the song properly imo. Mind just using a reverse slider at (1) which ends at 00:26:106?
Normal.
00:40:677 - The drum beat here is pretty strong. Keeping it inside the slide didn't really felt to be reflecting the music nicely.
Hard.
Please use slider tick 2 because the song is mostly having beats every 1/2. 00:28:892 - 00:30:392 - etc. Keeping these existing beat in the song with no expression at all didn't felt to be fitting. Tick 2 can solve it.
00:20:963 (1,2) - Just fyi in your future mappings, such penetrating slider concepts aren't really effective when the base spacing is higher than 1.00x because as you can see, an overlap happens between the path of (1) and the end of (2). Just keep this in mind for your future works.
Insane.
Same opinion for using tick 2.
00:43:677 (1) - Even I can hear that a sound exists here, I'm not really sure if this is really necessary to express. It quite lower's the emphasis of the previous drum-jumping sections imo but more importantly, the setting made the ending spot inconsistent with other diffs. It didn't really felt nice to happen in such a set.
If you could care more about structures and consistency over the music sections more than individual flows only, guess you could show some better quality work at the future. Not a bad work overall.
Yet I'm not really interested in nominating this set, so,, I wish you good luck.
00:26:106 - Since the instrument ends here, the music of 00:24:392 (1,2) wasn't exactly the same. Expressing those difference as a same 2/1 slider didn't felt to be reflecting the song properly imo. Mind just using a reverse slider at (1) which ends at 00:26:106?
Normal.
00:40:677 - The drum beat here is pretty strong. Keeping it inside the slide didn't really felt to be reflecting the music nicely.
Hard.
Please use slider tick 2 because the song is mostly having beats every 1/2. 00:28:892 - 00:30:392 - etc. Keeping these existing beat in the song with no expression at all didn't felt to be fitting. Tick 2 can solve it.
00:20:963 (1,2) - Just fyi in your future mappings, such penetrating slider concepts aren't really effective when the base spacing is higher than 1.00x because as you can see, an overlap happens between the path of (1) and the end of (2). Just keep this in mind for your future works.
Insane.
Same opinion for using tick 2.
00:43:677 (1) - Even I can hear that a sound exists here, I'm not really sure if this is really necessary to express. It quite lower's the emphasis of the previous drum-jumping sections imo but more importantly, the setting made the ending spot inconsistent with other diffs. It didn't really felt nice to happen in such a set.
If you could care more about structures and consistency over the music sections more than individual flows only, guess you could show some better quality work at the future. Not a bad work overall.
Yet I'm not really interested in nominating this set, so,, I wish you good luck.
Topic Starter
Fixed all in my diffs. Thanks for modding <3
I still want to have that thingy mapped at the end, I don't feel it takes away any emphasis and I love how it plays~
Thanks for the check!
@Chalwa set the tick rate on my diff to 2 xd
Thanks for the check!
@Chalwa set the tick rate on my diff to 2 xd
rip in Good Luck Chalwa XDDDD
Topic Starter
Made tick rate 2 ezek. Now ready for bubble and rank i think.
all changes were applied satisfactorily, imo.
re
re
Sorry about this. But there are some unrankable issues.
[Easy]
- 00:26:963 (2) - Why here you used 1.3x DS? Please keep your default DS in lower diffs.
- 00:27:820 (1) - ^
[Normal]
- Check AiMod, 00:05:962 (4) - Unsnap
[Hard]
- 00:26:106 (1,2,1,2) - In my opinion, use sliders instead of circles is better. Since 00:26:320 - and 00:26:749 - are quite weak. Check the same timing point in your highest diff, there are also sliders but not circles.
[ezek's Step Off Fool!]
So, you can get the previous BN to rebubble after fixing the unrankable issues. Then call me back.- Nice structure and symmetry pattern, no problem bother me.
Topic Starter
Meh, fixed all. I was doing this too fast ;-;.
Nominated.
chciałbyś XD
chciałbyś XD
again w
unrankable stuff looks fixed to me. good luck!
till it gets popped again
unrankable stuff looks fixed to me. good luck!
till it gets popped again
hihi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Time for face reveal
Topic Starter
After rankedDeRandom Otaku wrote:
Time for face reveal
DeRandom Otaku wrote:
Time for face reveal
Topic Starter
Yeaaaa <3... Thanks to you, to Nao and to all modders <3Kencho wrote:
Alright, congratz for your 1st rank
Qualified!
Congratulations Chalwa!
Topic Starter
Thanks Pachiru <3Pachiru wrote:
Congratulations Chalwa!
Topic Starter
YeaiiOkward wrote:
Nice!
wp xDCanadianBaka wrote:
oh gg
congrats chalwa
Gratzz! :3
Topic Starter
ThanksAgatsu wrote:
congrats chalwa
Ayyy, thanks <3KittyAdventure wrote:
Gratzz! :3
fuk u <333333333333Shmiklak wrote:
nevergrats
Thank you <333Lokidoki wrote:
Good job, Chalwa!~
: (Shmiklak wrote:
nevergrats
Topic Starter
no co zrobisz? ;'(Venix wrote:
: (Shmiklak wrote:
nevergrats