1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Projects
  4. Completed Projects
show more
posted
im not even in rookie hell yea
posted
i hope scuttle bug gets ranked in time
posted
I'd like some proof as to why people in outstanding contribution are in there.
I obviously don't stalk all of them and I have no idea what they did in the past year, so how can I cast a fair vote about them? =w=

First of all I'm curious as why I'm in there too.
I'm not saying I should or not be in there, but rather the reasons why I'm there. Whatever those reasons may be you should also confirm them with the user in question, since some nominator can just assume things on his own for things that someone may haven't done at all (just trying to bring up an interesting possible scenario).
Maybe someone helped a lot with an osu!booth in their country at some sort of event or maybe they got a lot of stuff done behind the scenes in general, not just modding/mapping activity (which imo is not enough to qualify someone for this). Stuff that only few witnessed and can actually say "yes, this guy worked his ass off for the game"

^ But I'd like to know what those things are, thanks
posted
Wait, so Counter-Attack of the Weak is nominated in the hitsounds category, but Gensou, Yume no Owari isn't?

FeelsBadMan
posted
If you want to bitch about a map not getting nominated, bear in mind you could have nominated it yourself. Even if it was your own map.
posted
@MrSergio - people just nominate. Unless they actually gave reasons for why they nominated people (which wasn't required), no one running the MCA can actually answer your question - unless you'd like an answer like "Cuz someone nominated them/you".
posted
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
posted
Std as always
posted

VINXIS wrote:

Hi relevant person!
lol is LGV894 still a relevant mapper?

asking the real question here
posted

Flower wrote:

The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
I don't understand how it's complicated.

You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.

I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
posted
If I knew I could vote for myself I would've participated huehueueh
posted
Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
posted

Shiirn wrote:

I don't understand how it's complicated.

You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.

I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
it's more of a 'unnecessarily complicated' than anything. formatting and all, i can understand where he's coming from. we just lack a proper system to vote for stuff with user verification (which is why we didn't use Google Forms), so this'll have to do.

MrSergio wrote:

Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
i don't see how that's a reason to remove it. this vote is purely subjective and opinion based, if a user feels that X didn't contribute, he wouldn't vote. yeah sure there's the fact that not everyone who contributes aims to get their name out there for exposure, so the average person won't 'notice' them. but i think it's a fair compromise so that the people who contribute get at least some sort of recognition, rather than none at all in the name of 'fairness'.
posted
tbh you could have set up google forms but require the user to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
posted

StarrStyx wrote:

tbh you could have set up google forms but require the user to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
very roundabout way of 'verifying', and also unreliable and possibly the same or more complications.
posted
hello
posted
will nominate myself next time to be on da list :v
posted
all these good people not being nominated

but i see myself in there 2x and gabe power

have memes gone too far?
posted
i saw myself and uta here
this isnt going to end well








natsu's halcyon on hitsounding lmao
posted

Shiirn wrote:

Flower wrote:

The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
I don't understand how it's complicated.

You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.

I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
You are changing the topic. What I meant is that I spent almost a whole afternoon composing a single PM with given format, not counting time spent checking beatmaps and people. This simply sucks.
show more
Please sign in to reply.