[ONE DIMENSION]
00:20:294 - Maybe it will fit in music like this ?

01:25:159 - Bad flow
01:26:101 (4,1,1,1) - Thanks for beautifull overlap
01:36:310 - I'd prefer not to move them
01:46:363 - ^ same
01:53:431 - 1 slider instead of two notes ?
02:14:635 (6,7,1,2,3) - Nice overplap tho
04:13:550 (3,4,1,2,3) - Overlap

I think that's all that caught my eyes attention
Good luck with ranking !

hi from my queue :3

[1Dimension]

1. 00:39:487 (1) - give this slider a "curved" shape, you put a lot of weird ones and theres this "normal" one xd
2. 01:55:944 (1,2,3,4) - i dont thisnk these represent the song well, cuz u are ignoring 01:56:101 - it should be mapped imo, smthn like: http://puu.sh/tw3b8/06d9d3a9b2.jpg jump stream or 3 1/4 sliders should work
3. 01:53:431 (4,5,6,7) - same ^ also check nc, should be the same as well
4. 02:32:383 (2) - ctrl+g cuz is the only one different
5. 03:24:198 (2) - ctrl+g(? more intuitive, cuz head is overlaped so is hard to see

cool map, gl! o/

bezbashn wrote:

[ONE DIMENSION]
00:20:294 - Maybe it will fit in music like this ? I think the current 1/16 fits the music more

01:25:159 - Bad flow Don't think so, the flow is rather smooth here
01:26:101 (4,1,1,1) - Thanks for beautifull overlap No problem
01:36:310 - I'd prefer not to move them Not really sure what you're trying to say here @@ So, no changes?
01:46:363 - ^ same Same
01:53:431 - 1 slider instead of two notes ? Is harder to identify the rhythm if I use 1/4 slider. Using the circle, the player can immediate identify that these are the duplets circle
02:14:635 (6,7,1,2,3) - Nice overplap tho Thanks~
04:13:550 (3,4,1,2,3) - Overlap Should be alright

I think that's all that caught my eyes attention
Good luck with ranking !

Small changes base on your mod. Anyway, thanks for the mod!

missa1912 wrote:

hi from my queue :3

[1Dimension]

1. 00:39:487 (1) - give this slider a "curved" shape, you put a lot of weird ones and theres this "normal" one xd Alright, sure
2. 01:55:944 (1,2,3,4) - i dont thisnk these represent the song well, cuz u are ignoring 01:56:101 - it should be mapped imo, smthn like: http://puu.sh/tw3b8/06d9d3a9b2.jpg jump stream or 3 1/4 sliders should work I think the current rhythm works really well, it might ignore that 01:56:101 - but it shouldn't be a big of an issue. And your suggestion, looks really evil LOL
3. 01:53:431 (4,5,6,7) - same ^ also check nc, should be the same as well Opps, NC sure. Other than that same as above
4. 02:32:383 (2) - ctrl+g cuz is the only one different Reworked the pattern here
5. 03:24:198 (2) - ctrl+g(? more intuitive, cuz head is overlaped so is hard to see Kinda, fixed~

cool map, gl! o/

Thanks for the mod missa~

Diff :
- 00:01:606 (2,3,4,5,6) - instead of making inconsistency at (4), imo it would be better if you arrange the spacing increasing by time. i mean example like http://puu.sh/txJ5H/161167a71b.jpg (when the spacing is increasing from 2 to 3, 3 to 4 but the gap isnt a big because begining of song
- 00:04:919 - whistle for strong piano
- 00:05:862 (3,5) - ^
- 00:09:007 (2) - maybe ctrl+g? strong piano doesnt deserve with 0,8x spacing
- 00:12:597 - 00:15:112 (1) - 00:16:056 (4) - 00:17:628 - 00:18:628 - whistle for piano. do for all similar stuff in this song. its too many orz
- 00:25:934 (1,2,1,2) - u can add whistle too for string's sound
- 00:35:701 (2) - i think its weird to see extended 1/8 slider here because you never use this before
- 00:47:649 (1,2,3,4) - i think ur jump are too overdone for calm part
- 00:50:515 (5,6) - if u care with blanket pls fix it
- 00:55:334 (2) - move to 136,240 to make better visual for 00:55:177 (1,2,3,4,5) - ?
- 01:08:981 (1) - ctrl+g is better i guess so its stacked with prev slider's tail
- 01:14:792 (3) - use higher spacing for emphasis the strong piano? 01:14:949 - this is weak so imo no need jump here, i think move (3) to 384,336 feels better
- 01:15:185 (2,3) - just curious why spacing is different for this triplet than other 1/4?
- 01:19:975 (1) - definitely need higher spacing for emphasis the cymbal
- 01:30:342 (1) - personally i would like to see faster slider from 01:32:816 (6) - because the music, imo 1,5x for this slider only would be nice
- 01:31:127 - strong music, add circle
- 01:40:394 (1) - and same sliders with this, same with 01:30:342 (1) -

out of my skill to modding this, no need kudo if this wasnt helpful for you

gl ~

Xinely wrote:

Diff :
- 00:01:606 (2,3,4,5,6) - instead of making inconsistency at (4), imo it would be better if you arrange the spacing increasing by time. i mean example like http://puu.sh/txJ5H/161167a71b.jpg (when the spacing is increasing from 2 to 3, 3 to 4 but the gap isnt a big because begining of song Hmm, adjusted a bit. Hopefuly is more noticeable now @@
- 00:04:919 - whistle for strong piano Alright, added more whistle at the rest of the section at strong piano
- 00:05:862 (3,5) - ^ ^
- 00:09:007 (2) - maybe ctrl+g? strong piano doesnt deserve with 0,8x spacing 00:08:378 (1,2) - since these two have similar piano so I wanted to have them flow somewhat linearly, not sure how to explain ><
- 00:12:597 - 00:15:112 (1) - 00:16:056 (4) - 00:17:628 - 00:18:628 - whistle for piano. do for all similar stuff in this song. its too many orz Yup, did exactly that just now LOL
- 00:25:934 (1,2,1,2) - u can add whistle too for string's sound Sure, sounds nice
- 00:35:701 (2) - i think its weird to see extended 1/8 slider here because you never use this before I think this fits perfectly with the draggin violin on the slider, followed up by circle on the strong violin too. Right about never use before, but this is the part where I start introducing to this 1/8 slider
- 00:47:649 (1,2,3,4) - i think ur jump are too overdone for calm part Should be alright, the song already starts to get really exciting from 00:46:707 - , so the spacing implements it well
- 00:50:515 (5,6) - if u care with blanket pls fix it Hopefully is better now @@
- 00:55:334 (2) - move to 136,240 to make better visual for 00:55:177 (1,2,3,4,5) - ? I think the current one looks better
- 01:08:981 (1) - ctrl+g is better i guess so its stacked with prev slider's tail The current slider tail stacks the previous slidertail too, should be fine
- 01:14:792 (3) - use higher spacing for emphasis the strong piano? 01:14:949 - this is weak so imo no need jump here, i think move (3) to 384,336 feels better I think the current one is okay, just wanted to keep 01:14:635 (2,3,1) - similar
- 01:15:185 (2,3) - just curious why spacing is different for this triplet than other 1/4? For me this triples seem better in emphasizing the clash cymbal, but might consider changing though since the other triple is more noticeable
- 01:19:975 (1) - definitely need higher spacing for emphasis the cymbal The current one is alright, no need to make it more difficult by increasing spacing here
- 01:30:342 (1) - personally i would like to see faster slider from 01:32:816 (6) - because the music, imo 1,5x for this slider only would be nice Maybe, but 01:30:342 (1) - slider is fits really well because its starting from new verse, and with the finish hitsound. Meanwhile 01:32:855 (1) - doesn't sound really nice with finish. So, sticking with this for now xd
- 01:31:127 - strong music, add circle This definitely fits a lot better with slider following the long piano
- 01:40:394 (1) - and same sliders with this, same with 01:30:342 (1) -Similar to what I've explained before ~

out of my skill to modding this, no need kudo if this wasnt helpful for you

gl ~

No worries, still very helpful though! Thanks for the mod~

Hey, Scarlet

[General]

1. BG size is unrankble, make 1366 x 768.

[ONE DIMENSION]

1. 00:15:112 (1,2,3,4) - Same DS?
2. 00:28:953 - 00:33:969 - 00:25:767 - 00:37:790 - And so on. Add green point with 5 volume?
3. 01:06:917 - Miiss beat?
4. 01:14:792 (3,1) - Swap NC? 01:16:049 (3,1) - .
5. 02:08:981 (5) - Clap? Cool effect.
6. 02:14:635 (3) - NC?
7. 02:19:975 (5) - NC, because here nc 02:18:405 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
8. 03:58:864 (3) - NC.
9. 01:20:132 (2) - wtf whistle?
10. 01:30:970 (4) - make jump on srtong beat?
11. 01:33:169 (2,3,4) - Looks boring. Can do so?
12. 01:54:530 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Can improve form.

good map, gl <3

Lama Poluna wrote:

Hey, Scarlet

[General]

1. BG size is unrankble, make 1366 x 768. Just copied the picture directly without editing @@ Fixed!

[ONE DIMENSION]

1. 00:15:112 (1,2,3,4) - Same DS? Not really fitting. I mapped like this because I want to emphasize the strong piano at 00:15:112 (1) - 00:15:112 (1) - with a bigger gap
2. 00:28:953 - 00:33:969 - 00:25:767 - 00:37:790 - And so on. Add green point with 5 volume? Alright, fixed the volume for most of the part. Hopefully
3. 01:06:917 - Miiss beat? Maybe, should but fine. I want to follow similar rhythm from 01:04:515 (1,2) - where the song gradually gets slower and slower pace
4. 01:14:792 (3,1) - Swap NC? 01:16:049 (3,1) - .I think the current NC should be fine
5. 02:08:981 (5) - Clap? Cool effect. Yup sure
6. 02:14:635 (3) - NC? Sure
7. 02:19:975 (5) - NC, because here nc 02:18:405 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Alright
8. 03:58:864 (3) - NC.
9. 01:20:132 (2) - wtf whistle? Yea, accidentally whistle the whole slider. Forgot to remove it >>
10. 01:30:970 (4) - make jump on srtong beat? Should be fine, wanna make sure 01:31:127 (5) - has obvious larger spacing fitting the strong piano
11. 01:33:169 (2,3,4) - Looks boring. Can do so? Made similar pattern
12. 01:54:530 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Can improve form. Increased spacing here

good map, gl <3

Thanks for the mod Lama~

From Roastin queue m4m

[ONE DIMENSION]
00:41:698 (1) - end on white tick?
00:44:195 (1) - ctrl + G? imo it's better, but not a problem the way it is
00:49:102 (2) - Pretty sure this needs to be on the blue tick
00:49:848 (3) -Should be on the red tick, or if anything, on the yellow tick (not on the 1/12 gray tick)
00:50:515 (5) - start on white tick
00:59:300 (1) - should start on the red tick
01:07:167 (1) - cut the slider in half and make it repeat, since i think you're trying to map to that little static-like noise in the background (there's a sound here 01:07:917 - )
01:38:666 (5) - change into a 1/4 slider?
01:58:536 (2,1) - Maybe just stack? kinda looks ugly currently imo
03:29:370 (1) - end on yellow tick?
04:58:079 (1,2) - I feel like there should be 4 of these sliders that should start on the white ticks 04:57:293 - 04:57:608 - 04:57:922 - 04:58:236 -
04:59:414 (4,1) - blanket?

I really confused on why some objects aren't snapped to the 1/4 beats. it just feels very weird. That's all from me, sorry for short mod. streams look nicely done good luck

Ohwow wrote:

From Roastin queue m4m

[ONE DIMENSION]
00:41:698 (1) - end on white tick?
00:44:195 (1) - ctrl + G? imo it's better, but not a problem the way it is
00:49:102 (2) - Pretty sure this needs to be on the blue tick
00:49:848 (3) -Should be on the red tick, or if anything, on the yellow tick (not on the 1/12 gray tick)
00:50:515 (5) - start on white tick
00:59:300 (1) - should start on the red tick
01:07:167 (1) - cut the slider in half and make it repeat, since i think you're trying to map to that little static-like noise in the background (there's a sound here 01:07:917 - ) There's a sound there yea, but I would like to end this slow section by following the strong violin

The entire beginning section have been checked by Rumia-, someone I trust when comes to timing. It's pretty accurate if you listen to them in 25% speed Maybe except for 00:49:063 (2) -

01:38:666 (5) - change into a 1/4 slider? Not really fitting, I want the triples to fully emphasize on that loud triple beat. The 1/4 slider will make it sound rather off
01:58:536 (2,1) - Maybe just stack? kinda looks ugly currently imo Should be fine. I think it fits the piano well too
03:29:370 (1) - end on yellow tick? As stated above when come to timing xd
04:58:079 (1,2) - I feel like there should be 4 of these sliders that should start on the white ticks 04:57:293 - 04:57:608 - 04:57:922 - 04:58:236 - Sure, 4 consecutive 1/8 sliders might make it easier to play but there's an obvious beat 04:57:608 - that needs to be emphasize imo. I'll consider changing though cuz a lot of players broke here too @@
04:59:414 (4,1) - blanket? Erm, no. The current slider is good enough fitting the downbeat of the song

I really confused on why some objects aren't snapped to the 1/4 beats. it just feels very weird. That's all from me, sorry for short mod. streams look nicely done good luck

Thanks for the mod~ No changes when comes to timing part as I had a few people checked on these weird timing section already.

from queue

1 dim

00:20:294 (1) - imo a 1/8 slider here fit the piano better than a 1/16 reverse slider
00:40:285 - here is a tune change, so i think it deserves a note
01:38:745 - ^ (put it in a stream)
04:40:723 - ^
01:06:917 - ^ (but this time it's a beat)
03:20:305 (1) - this shape looks not quite well, try to make something like the img below:

03:20:612 - delete the red line
03:33:105 (2) - blanket
04:57:451 (3,4,1,2,3) - imo it's no need to follow those 1/8 and use the reverse sliders which are quite weird here, just keep your 1/4 stream for the piano

quite nice bg!
gl

NM Queue~

00:06:805 (1,2,3) - might wanna make all of these separate combos because it's in 1/3
00:52:232 (2,3,4) - straight line OCD stuff (make these a straight line please)
02:12:122 (1) - move this a little down and to the left for readability
03:16:204 (2,3) - make (2) a curved slider that blankets (3) (it's a smooth note, doesnt really justify the angle slider)
04:17:869 (2) - make this a curved slider (angle slider not really justified)
04:22:738 (3) - stack this on top of 04:22:660 (2) - the sudden ds change can be a bit disorientating
04:30:435 (2) - make this a curved slider (subjective)
04:33:733 (1) - this is not symmetrical, the slider end is a little too long
04:58:550 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - maybe make the ds from really big to tiny, it's a downwards glissando and all: one ridiculous ds makes it feel overmapped

mfw can't mod that much because there's already 3 pages of mods above me

Neanmoins wrote:

from queue

1 dim

00:20:294 (1) - imo a 1/8 slider here fit the piano better than a 1/16 reverse slider Hmm, yea sure. Sounds better
00:40:285 - here is a tune change, so i think it deserves a note Maybe, but I tried adding note here before. It doesn't really work well with the obvious violin here 00:40:444 (1,2,3,1) -
01:38:745 - ^ (put it in a stream) I'm following the obvious triple sound at 01:38:509 (3,4,5) - and 01:38:824 (1) - . Doesn't feel right to connect them into a stream
04:40:723 - ^ Alright
01:06:917 - ^ (but this time it's a beat) Mentioned about ignoring this before, I guess is better to add a note here
03:20:305 (1) - this shape looks not quite well, try to make something like the img below:
Looks nicer than trying to blanket it LOL
03:20:612 - delete the red line This should be fine, I'm following the timing fron the ranked version. It might not affect anything in standard gameplay, but it will for other game modes
03:33:105 (2) - blanket It actually looks perfect to me, I changed the stack leniency instead
04:57:451 (3,4,1,2,3) - imo it's no need to follow those 1/8 and use the reverse sliders which are quite weird here, just keep your 1/4 stream for the piano
Yea, I think I should. Better than random breaking at 1/8 sliders >.>
quite nice bg!
gl

Thanks for the mod Neanmoins~

[ Pika ] wrote:

NM Queue~

00:06:805 (1,2,3) - might wanna make all of these separate combos because it's in 1/3 I think should be fine, NC spam doesn't feel right in a very slow and calm section
00:52:232 (2,3,4) - straight line OCD stuff (make these a straight line please) Sure, hopefuly is linear now
02:12:122 (1) - move this a little down and to the left for readability The stacks here should be fine
03:16:204 (2,3) - make (2) a curved slider that blankets (3) (it's a smooth note, doesnt really justify the angle slider) Sure
04:17:869 (2) - make this a curved slider (angle slider not really justified) For this should be fine as it is
04:22:738 (3) - stack this on top of 04:22:660 (2) - the sudden ds change can be a bit disorientating Remapped this section, the spacing isn't the problem, but the flow feels kinda weird
04:30:435 (2) - make this a curved slider (subjective) Made something similar
04:33:733 (1) - this is not symmetrical, the slider end is a little too long Suppose to be that way, making it symmetrical actually looks really weird for me
04:58:550 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - maybe make the ds from really big to tiny, it's a downwards glissando and all: one ridiculous ds makes it feel overmapped Yup, changed the spacing

mfw can't mod that much because there's already 3 pages of mods above me

Thanks for the mod Pika~ No worries, it's quite helpful

Hi from my queue o/
00:07:434 (1) - Move this slider to the position of this circle : 00:06:805 (1) -
00:10:591 (2) - Move this circle to the head of the following sliderhead like in the 2 previous patterns
03:35:618 to 3:50 : You should set the volume at 30-40% and increase it in this part like in the music

Gokateigo wrote:

Hi from my queue o/
00:07:434 (1) - Move this slider to the position of this circle : 00:06:805 (1) - The reason why I didn't stack because 00:07:434 (1) - has rather loud piano which is not really similar to the previous (1) circle. Making it a little further emphasizes on the piano really well
00:10:591 (2) - Move this circle to the head of the following sliderhead like in the 2 previous patterns Maybe, but the current pattern should be fine as it is. Will consider though
03:35:618 to 3:50 : You should set the volume at 30-40% and increase it in this part like in the music Erm, 60% should be fine since it fits the intensity of the song. I'm not very good when comes to adjusting the volume perfectly following the music so I prefer it to have constant volume @@

Thanks for the mod~ Although I might not apply exactly the place that you have stated in the mod but this makes me check back the entire map again to look for inconsistent stacks and stuff

m4m q thing

any source of long version for the title? I found https://diverse.direct/diverse-system/100sr-a013/ for the metadata that I assume you took the mp3 from it.

00:13:540 (3) - I would take a whistle on head for the piano but 00:13:226 (2) -, or idk if it's not. and 00:16:056 (4) - got no whistle even though the piano sound is much stronger, I prefer swapping the whistle between 00:15:741 (3) - and this.
00:18:294 (2,3) - ^
00:20:294 (1) - whistle? this definitely deserves the one imo lol this is everything I feel them out of place in slow part.
00:46:707 - you can consider reducing the volume by 10-20 here, whistles are loud in comparison with the music. I mean everything on 60% volume in this section could be considered.
01:19:504 (1) - the kick sound on music should be 1/16, although 1/8 also works okay because it's the half of it. just a mention.
01:31:677 (2,3) - this isn't good overmapping imo, I know you heard a tiny sound at the blue tick but if I had to say it's unnoticeable. one single 1/2 circle also works better towards the jump you made as well.
01:41:729 (2,3) - same here.
02:30:342 (5) - without whistle sounds better to me, the melody and drums both stopped at 02:30:263 - and there's only strange small sound at the beat. you therefore don't really need to hitsounding it unless you got a reason.
03:00:656 (3) - I expected a whistle here for the drum. 03:01:284 (3) - 03:01:520 (6,7,8) - they also are good to be emphasized by whistle, as it's not really loud to be around.
03:13:064 (5) - finish for the obvious cymbal sound maybe.
03:23:412 (1,2,3,1,2) - I thought it's something like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232252 lul.
03:34:362 - again, the volume setting makes hitsounds very loud in the part that the music is going quiet. decreasing volume by 10%? louder volume than the point I mentioned before would be allowed because the streams.
03:46:927 (1) - the finish should be on the head.
04:14:571 (5) - same as 02:30:342 (5) -
04:20:383 (2) - it would look much better if the slider sharp was clearn, move the end point to make it even?
04:24:623 (1) - missing finish, I don't get if you actually did it on purpose, there seems so many of lack of finishes to me.
04:26:665 (1) - this isn't snapping on anything
04:54:780 (4) - a nc is nice to make a jump looking more clearn with 04:53:524 (1) -

Delis wrote:

m4m q thing

any source of long version for the title? I found https://diverse.direct/diverse-system/100sr-a013/ for the metadata that I assume you took the mp3 from it. Not really sure on this one, I took the metadata directly from the recently ranked version so it should be correct as it is

00:13:540 (3) - I would take a whistle on head for the piano but 00:13:226 (2) -, or idk if it's not. and 00:16:056 (4) - got no whistle even though the piano sound is much stronger, I prefer swapping the whistle between 00:15:741 (3) - and this. Kinda, reworked this whistle hitsound in the early parts
00:18:294 (2,3) - ^ ^
00:20:294 (1) - whistle? this definitely deserves the one imo lol this is everything I feel them out of place in slow part. ^
00:46:707 - you can consider reducing the volume by 10-20 here, whistles are loud in comparison with the music. I mean everything on 60% volume in this section could be considered. I think the current 60% is fine as it is. 10%-20% is too soft when the song obvious started became a little more exciting than before.
01:19:504 (1) - the kick sound on music should be 1/16, although 1/8 also works okay because it's the half of it. just a mention. Yea, but 1/16 kinda makes it a lot easier to break though. Keeping it simple 1/8 should be fine
01:31:677 (2,3) - this isn't good overmapping imo, I know you heard a tiny sound at the blue tick but if I had to say it's unnoticeable. one single 1/2 circle also works better towards the jump you made as well. Kinda, removed
01:41:729 (2,3) - same here. ^
02:30:342 (5) - without whistle sounds better to me, the melody and drums both stopped at 02:30:263 - and there's only strange small sound at the beat. you therefore don't really need to hitsounding it unless you got a reason. Yea, sounds good actually
03:00:656 (3) - I expected a whistle here for the drum. 03:01:284 (3) - 03:01:520 (6,7,8) - they also are good to be emphasized by whistle, as it's not really loud to be around.Yea, actually whistle does really sound good here. But 03:01:284 (3,7) - will be kinda forcing for me
03:13:064 (5) - finish for the obvious cymbal sound maybe.Sure why not
03:23:412 (1,2,3,1,2) - I thought it's something like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232252 lul. Overall pattern here seems really ugly, reworked it my own way. Nice suggestion though
03:34:362 - again, the volume setting makes hitsounds very loud in the part that the music is going quiet. decreasing volume by 10%? louder volume than the point I mentioned before would be allowed because the streams. I mentioned about this earlier. Should be alright
03:46:927 (1) - the finish should be on the head. Is already finish-ed though >.>
04:14:571 (5) - same as 02:30:342 (5) - Yea sure
04:20:383 (2) - it would look much better if the slider sharp was clearn, move the end point to make it even? Went back to the typical triangular slider instead yea
04:24:623 (1) - missing finish, I don't get if you actually did it on purpose, there seems so many of lack of finishes to me. Added finish-es in various part in the kiai, should be fine now
04:26:665 (1) - this isn't snapping on anything Kinda copied the rhythm from previous kiai without much of a thought. Fixed!
04:54:780 (4) - a nc is nice to make a jump looking more clearn with 04:53:524 (1) - Sure~

Thanks for the mod Delis~

http://www.gdbg.tv/2010/disc/index2.html for confirmation of the metadata so yea

hey, m4m, sorry it's kinda late lol had some irl stuff to take care of

[ONE DIMENSION]

1. 00:15:112 (1,2,3,4) - based on previous patterns, i kind of expected the (1,2,3) to be equal spacing and the 3->4 jump to be a bit higher. kind of like 00:03:976 (1,2,3,1) - or 00:12:242 (1,2,1) - or 00:16:685 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 00:34:123 (1) - don't know how much you care, but this is nearly off screen on HR mod
3. 00:40:285 - no circle here for the violin? seems a bit odd seeing how you mapped the violins right after it. same suggestion at 03:27:950 - since you also skipped over the violin here
4. 01:22:168 (2) - forget a clap here by any chance?
5. 01:28:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - k this stream is really cool
6. 01:30:022 (1,1) - might look aesthetically nicer 01:30:022 (1) - was blanketing the slider end for 01:30:336 (1) -
7. 04:12:052 (1,2,3) - this was a bit confusing to read. it's hard to notice the (3) and its repeat when it's underneath all the stream notes
8. 04:34:984 (3,4) - the sharp vertical flow here is kind of unnatural to play imo. maybe try changing the direction of 04:34:827 (2,3) - to give better direction of flow?
   
   SPOILER

   just a rough idea, you can probably make the flow here much better by placing around a bit more
   
9. 04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is also really cool

pretty cool, hope this helps!

Doormat wrote:

hey, m4m, sorry it's kinda late lol had some irl stuff to take care of

[ONE DIMENSION]

1. 00:15:112 (1,2,3,4) - based on previous patterns, i kind of expected the (1,2,3) to be equal spacing and the 3->4 jump to be a bit higher. kind of like 00:03:976 (1,2,3,1) - or 00:12:242 (1,2,1) - or 00:16:685 (1,2,3,1) -
   Yea alright, made (1,2,3) equal spacing
2. 00:34:123 (1) - don't know how much you care, but this is nearly off screen on HR mod
   Hmm, lowered down a little. Hopefully it's fine now
3. 00:40:285 - no circle here for the violin? seems a bit odd seeing how you mapped the violins right after it. same suggestion at 03:27:950 - since you also skipped over the violin here
   I tried putting circle here before, seems like it doesn't work really well because the violin here it too soft compared to the obvious ones later. So putting a circle here really feels odd to play along with the strong violins
4. 01:22:168 (2) - forget a clap here by any chance?
   Seems like it >.>
5. 01:28:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - k this stream is really cool
   Thanks~
6. 01:30:022 (1,1) - might look aesthetically nicer 01:30:022 (1) - was blanketing the slider end for 01:30:336 (1) -
   Wanted to do that in the first place, not sure why it went off the grid lel
7. 04:12:052 (1,2,3) - this was a bit confusing to read. it's hard to notice the (3) and its repeat when it's underneath all the stream notes
   Kinda, I guess I've been stacking a little too much
8. 04:34:984 (3,4) - the sharp vertical flow here is kind of unnatural to play imo. maybe try changing the direction of 04:34:827 (2,3) - to give better direction of flow?
   
   SPOILER

   just a rough idea, you can probably make the flow here much better by placing around a bit more
   
   Yea, definitely flows better
9. 04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is also really cool
   Thanks~

pretty cool, hope this helps!

Thanks for the mods Doormat~

General

1. what about changing S sample sections to S:C2 and add a silent sliderslide hitsound? sounds better at slow parts

ONE DIMENSION

1. 00:05:547 (2,4) - somehow i feel whistles should be added to 00:05:862 (3,5) - instead according to piano, similar to 00:08:378 (1,2) -
2. 00:30:715 - 30% volume sounds better on 5
3. 00:37:953 (1) - consider rearranging shape a bit to avoid the unnecessary overlap here
4. 00:40:285 - why not map into the violin sound? it sounds kinda soft but it's similar to 00:29:610 (2) - imo
5. 00:40:922 (1,2) - swap nc? or is it arranged this way intentionally according to the pattern
6. 00:52:243 (2,3,4) - i feel it is intended to be straight and even spacing here?
7. 01:06:661 (2,3) - mind turning into a slider? rhythm change is a bit hard to detect here..
8. 01:37:561 - 01:47:613 - finish?
9. 01:38:346 - add whistle here instead of 01:38:503 - ? fits the kickslider pattern and it's similar to 01:35:676 (1,2,3,4) - and some other spots
10. 01:40:074 (1,1) - sharp turn at slider feels bit forced to play and inconsistent with your other similar patterns, sth like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7375108 might flow better, tho it would need some adjustments on the latter objects
11. 01:48:399 (1) - should be 1/8 instead? not quite sure cuz theres sth wrong with my audio device
12. 01:48:556 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo the stream should be arranged in a way similar to 03:02:064 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - cuz music turns at 01:48:870 -
13. 02:00:493 - why only this one is normal sample while rest are all additions?
14. 02:20:912 (9,10) - what about turning them into a kickslider so it's more obvious that u r following 02:20:912 - 02:21:069 - the two sounds
15. 02:21:069 (1) - I'd suggest converting the shape a bit so that it looks visually better with 02:21:540 (4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7375310, mayb personal preference tho
16. 04:05:141 (9,10,1,2,3,4) - ^
17. 02:21:697 (5,6) - should be less spaced like 02:05:676 (4,5) - etc. imo
18. 02:30:257 (4,5) - strong beats ends at 02:30:257 - so even if theres some minor sound at 02:30:336 (5) - a circle doesn't really fit in this case. consider turning 4,5 into a kickslider instead
19. 04:14:486 (4,5) - ^
20. 03:03:006 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 03:03:634 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - <- i think streams should be divided this way instead cuz 03:03:634 - is same sound as 03:02:378 - and 03:03:006 -
21. 04:48:491 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - ^
22. 03:15:570 (1,2,3) - why in this section some of the slider tails are muted, like 03:20:299 (1) - 03:25:639 (1) - but not all? feels inconsistent
23. 04:26:581 (10,1,2) - dunno how other testplays turn out but this stream is too sharp to turn for me ;;
24. 04:42:209 (1) - 1/4 here
25. 04:57:209 (8,1) - no turns in stream?
26. 04:58:387 (7,5,6) - minor, making them same visual spacing as the stream would be nice
27. 04:59:801 - the ending sound isnt that quiet, 20% volume doesnt really fit

get those things confirmed and call me

Garden wrote:

General

1. what about changing S sample sections to S:C2 and add a silent sliderslide hitsound? sounds better at slow parts
   Yea, does sound a lot better

ONE DIMENSION

1. 00:05:547 (2,4) - somehow i feel whistles should be added to 00:05:862 (3,5) - instead according to piano, similar to 00:08:378 (1,2) -
   Yea, followed the strong piano does sound better
2. 00:30:715 - 30% volume sounds better on 5
   Sure
3. 00:37:953 (1) - consider rearranging shape a bit to avoid the unnecessary overlap here
   Kinda, remade the slider
4. 00:40:285 - why not map into the violin sound? it sounds kinda soft but it's similar to 00:29:610 (2) - imo
   Stated before about this, this violin here is too soft compared to 00:40:444 (1,2,3,1) - . Doesn't really feel right to make this part as if the violin is as loud as 00:40:444 (1,2,3,1) - . Ignoring it seems to worked well for me
5. 00:40:922 (1,2) - swap nc? or is it arranged this way intentionally according to the pattern
   Yea, I kinda did this for the triangular pattern, similar to what I've done here 03:28:578 (1) -
6. 00:52:243 (2,3,4) - i feel it is intended to be straight and even spacing here?
   Seems a little of yea LOL. Hopefully is better liao
7. 01:06:661 (2,3) - mind turning into a slider? rhythm change is a bit hard to detect here..
   Yup, slider is definitely better here
8. 01:37:561 - 01:47:613 - finish?
   Sure
9. 01:38:346 - add whistle here instead of 01:38:503 - ? fits the kickslider pattern and it's similar to 01:35:676 (1,2,3,4) - and some other spots
   Sure, applied to rest of the section too. Hopefully is nice enough
10. 01:40:074 (1,1) - sharp turn at slider feels bit forced to play and inconsistent with your other similar patterns, sth like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7375108 might flow better, tho it would need some adjustments on the latter objects oo, nice catch. Yea, looks like this is the only one that's inconsistent >.>
11. 01:48:399 (1) - should be 1/8 instead? not quite sure cuz theres sth wrong with my audio device
    Not sure how it ended up at 1/6 actually LOL
12. 01:48:556 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo the stream should be arranged in a way similar to 03:02:064 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - cuz music turns at 01:48:870 -
    Alright, seems a lot nicer now
13. 02:00:493 - why only this one is normal sample while rest are all additions?
    Not sure either, missed this I guess
14. 02:20:912 (9,10) - what about turning them into a kickslider so it's more obvious that u r following 02:20:912 - 02:21:069 - the two sounds
    Seems to follow the piano a lot better yea
15. 02:21:069 (1) - I'd suggest converting the shape a bit so that it looks visually better with 02:21:540 (4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7375310, mayb personal preference tho
    Your suggestion looks good
16. 04:05:141 (9,10,1,2,3,4) - ^
    ^
17. 02:21:697 (5,6) - should be less spaced like 02:05:676 (4,5) - etc. imo
    Really nice suggestion, thanks!
18. 02:30:257 (4,5) - strong beats ends at 02:30:257 - so even if theres some minor sound at 02:30:336 (5) - a circle doesn't really fit in this case. consider turning 4,5 into a kickslider instead
    Always thought this was alright since it wasn't that obvious. 1/4 slider does seem to fit nicely actually
19. 04:14:486 (4,5) - ^
    ^
20. 03:03:006 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 03:03:634 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - <- i think streams should be divided this way instead cuz 03:03:634 - is same sound as 03:02:378 - and 03:03:006 -
    yea, I remapped the entire streams here
21. 04:48:491 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - ^
    ^
22. 03:15:570 (1,2,3) - why in this section some of the slider tails are muted, like 03:20:299 (1) - 03:25:639 (1) - but not all? feels inconsistent
    Wasn't aware of this, fixed the volume~
23. 04:26:581 (10,1,2) - dunno how other testplays turn out but this stream is too sharp to turn for me ;;
    Hmm, from past testplays I've seen this part seems rather fine though
24. 04:42:209 (1) - 1/4 here
    Sure
25. 04:57:209 (8,1) - no turns in stream?
    I think this one should be fine as it is >.>
26. 04:58:387 (7,5,6) - minor, making them same visual spacing as the stream would be nice
    Moved a bit to avoid overlaps
27. 04:59:801 - the ending sound isnt that quiet, 20% volume doesnt really fit
    Increase to 50%

get those things confirmed and call me

Thanks for the mod Garden~ Really nice

1

Sorry man, it seems still very difficult for me, I can't judge this map at all.

aaa hype :3

Kencho wrote:

Sorry man, it seems still very difficult for me, I can't judge this map at all.

Eh, no problem ya. Looks like I have to tone down my mapping a little next time

Garden wrote:

1

Thanks Garden~

Linada wrote:

aaa hype :3

:3

HYPE!!!

I am fucking hyped for that I love the song and the beatmap is pretty good.

Few things (It's just my opinion):
00:29:443 (1,2,1) - Maybe difficult to read for the first times playing I also needed my time to read that perfectly to go down for the slider.

00:35:702 (2,1,2,1,2) - Also difficult to read (doesn't mean it's bad, it's still great to play)

01:37:443 (7) - You snap many sliders after 1/4 streams in 1/8 (also doesn't mean it's bad), be careful that it will not be too confusing

01:53:425 (1,2,1,2) - Not easy to read, but smooth following (clockwise).

01:55:938 (1,2,3,4) - Another double's

01:58:294 (1,2,1,2,3) - Looks like an placing error (the circle after the slider)

02:09:289 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - That's good, but look what will be better (normal streams or slider streams right now)

02:16:435 (7,1) - 02:18:948 (4,1) - Hard following

02:21:854 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Stepped stream

02:29:315 (4,1) - Hard followup

03:04:655 (4,1) - Hard followup

03:53:518 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Slider stream

04:26:581 (10,1) - Space stream follows after the normal stream, hard followup

04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - Looks good, but you can also make that more epic like bigger sliders (I hope that's understandable)



This is a great map! Your timing is unbelievable and your positioning is very well!
All I wrote should not be a critic, just some tips or "hints". Be careful about the follow up from the spaced streams with the sharp angels.

I really hope this will be ranked sometimes! I like the song and the map!

Albatross wrote:

I am fucking hyped for that I love the song and the beatmap is pretty good.
Oh nicee, didn't really expect anyone to mod this map randomly >.> Thanks~
Few things (It's just my opinion):
00:29:443 (1,2,1) - Maybe difficult to read for the first times playing I also needed my time to read that perfectly to go down for the slider.
The overlap works perfectly fine as it is though, seen quite a lot of testplays, this part shouldn't be much of a problem

00:35:702 (2,1,2,1,2) - Also difficult to read (doesn't mean it's bad, it's still great to play)
Similar to what I've mentioned

01:37:443 (7) - You snap many sliders after 1/4 streams in 1/8 (also doesn't mean it's bad), be careful that it will not be too confusing
If you're talking about the 1/8 slider, it should play perfectly fine as it fits the 1/8 part of the song. I left a small 1/8 gap making sure the player doesn't break this part very easily

01:53:425 (1,2,1,2) - Not easy to read, but smooth following (clockwise).
Purposely didn't stack the duplets so that it would be easy to read though

01:55:938 (1,2,3,4) - Another double's
Similar stuff

01:58:294 (1,2,1,2,3) - Looks like an placing error (the circle after the slider)
This is fairly intentional. Since there's sound at 01:58:530 (2) - but is not as significant as the 01:58:608 (1,2,3) - , therefore the spacing of 01:58:530 (2,1) - makes sure that the (2) note is really different compared to others

02:09:289 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - That's good, but look what will be better (normal streams or slider streams right now)
This is fine, tons of streamy maps also uses 1/8 slider stream. 1/4 seems very weak in emphasize the strong intensive piano here, and holding down 1/8 repeat slider feels dull and weak.

02:16:435 (7,1) - 02:18:948 (4,1) - Hard following
Not really a huge problem, is not that hard to follow

02:21:854 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Stepped stream
Similar to ^

02:29:315 (4,1) - Hard followup
^

03:04:655 (4,1) - Hard followup
^

03:53:518 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Slider stream
Similar to what I've mentioned easier

04:26:581 (10,1) - Space stream follows after the normal stream, hard followup
This is fine, the space stream really helps in emphasizing the intense part of the song

04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - Looks good, but you can also make that more epic like bigger sliders (I hope that's understandable)
Maybe, but wanna keep this simple as it is though


This is a great map! Your timing is unbelievable and your positioning is very well!
All I wrote should not be a critic, just some tips or "hints". Be careful about the follow up from the spaced streams with the sharp angels.

I really hope this will be ranked sometimes! I like the song and the map!

Sorry, don't think I'll be making any changes based on your mod though. Still, really thanks for your time for modding this map

hi!

consider using hp 6? its a pretty streamy map so u have plenty of hp gain, and its 6.8 stars
[General]
some whistles at the start don't really feel like they're taking into account the songs melody. whistles such as 00:03:032 (2) - 00:04:290 (2) - 00:09:950 (1) - feel like they're placed just to have whistles on white ticks. i feel like it'd be better to give feedback on the most prominent sounds only, so i dont think the whistles are necessary. others include 00:13:226 (2) - 00:14:483 (1) - 00:15:741 (3) - 00:16:999 (2) - 00:18:294 (2) - 00:19:628 (2) - though you can do what works for you.

and if im not mistaken, isn't stuff like 01:11:017 - 01:13:530 - etc. missing a clap in every kiai?

02:15:571 - 03:59:801 - i didnt really like how you randomly started introducing claps here >< this is still a build up section, so having the claps kinda ruined it
[ONE DIMENSION]
00:29:443 - how come the hitsound volume jumps around so much here? it makes 00:30:400 - sound really loud compared to 00:31:016 . you should probably just stick to one volume
00:40:444 - ^ also just seems to get really quiet
01:08:975 (1,2) - rhythm seems quite awkward cause 01:09:367 (2) - doesn't actually exist. the melody starts from 01:09:446 - so it doesnt make much sense to prioritise 01:09:367 (2) - over 01:09:289 . could probably try a rhythm where 01:09:289 - is a clickable kickslider or something
01:14:629 (2,3,4) - should probably reduce the spacing between 01:14:786 (3,4) - for proper emphasis
01:15:414 (1,2,1,2,3) - the emphasis just seems so weird imo, it sounds like 01:15:571 (2,1,2) - is grouped together and 01:16:043 (3) - is accented in the music yet this is mapped to give priority to 01:15:571 (2) - instead. also the 1/4 on 01:16:200 (1,2,3,4,5) - kinda comes out of no where
01:17:928 (7) - 01:18:556 (3) - 01:19:341 (9) - there are so many sounds covered by this pattern that barely receive any recognition. stuff like 01:18:006 (8) - 01:19:341 (9) - is just stuck in the midsts of a stream, perhaps using kick slider jumps could give them nice emphasis. and the way that 01:18:242 (1,2,3) - is designed/comboed makes 01:18:556 (3) - seem like it belongs to 01:18:242 (1,2) - yet these are very different :c
01:25:938 (3) - clap should be on 01:26:095 (4) . listen closesly to the snares
01:27:037 (2,3,4) - with patterns like 01:25:781 (2,3,4) - you made 4 stand out a lot, yet in this pattern the sound is the loudest but doesn't really get any emphasis at all. why not make this a slider extending from 01:27:352 - to 01:27:587 - ? the sound at 01:27:509 (1) - is relatively weak and can be skipped
01:29:079 (1) - 01:29:708 (1) - dont think there are claps here
01:29:943 (4,1) - curve could look nicer with the shape of the stream
01:30:022 (1,1) - idk dont u find the spacing here too small to have a proper effect? 01:40:074 (1,1) - seems like a much better alternative
01:31:121 (5) - clap?
01:33:477 (4,1) - clap should be on 1
01:35:990 (3,4) - clap on 4. yea gonna stop pointing these out, see if u can double check hitsounds
01:50:441 (1,2) - would be nice to do something different here, since theres no sound on 01:50:755 - compared to the previous ones
01:59:236 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe a ctrl g'ed version of this would be more appropriate. after all, the pitch is lowering not rising
02:00:493 (1,1) - similar to points raised earlier, i reckon 02:00:493 (1) - could do with more spacing to stress it further and yea there isn't really anything on 02:00:807 (1) - so covering it with a slider end would express how the music momentarily stops
02:05:205 (1,2,3,4,5) - the fact that u previously had slider streams for the piano 02:03:320 (1,2,3,4) - makes 02:05:205 (1,2,3,4,5) - way too overemphasised. same for 02:06:462 (1,2,3)
02:05:676 (4,5) - also it'd be nice to differentiate this with 02:06:933 (4,5) - since with the latter one has the piano supporting it
02:07:718 (1,2,3) - 3 has piano but 1 and 2 dont. so i dont see the need for all of them to be kicksliders
02:19:655 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - every 3rd note is emphasised here 02:19:891 (4) - 02:20:126 (3) - yet this is mapped like an ordinary stream in groups of 4. maybe you could reconsider the patterning/hitsounds
02:23:346 - pretty strong piano here, this would play better as a quintuplet
02:25:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - think u could do a better job at mapping the change in piano here, this sounds nothing like 02:25:310 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) . the things to highlight here would be 02:25:938 - 02:26:095 - 02:26:409 .
02:36:618 - well, since this is really similar to the first kiai, the same points apply
03:00:336 (3) - could do a better job at emphasising this
03:05:362 (1,2) - what calls for this to be a kick + circle when the others are 1/2 sliders? would make more sense to represent each equally imo
03:08:032 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - im not really sure where these 1/4s are coming from. its pretty much the same as whats represented by 03:07:090 (3)
03:24:349 (1) - should end on red tick? sounds is much more dominant there
03:41:895 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - piano sounds like 1/3 here
04:03:884 - ye same as what was mentioned previously for this section
04:23:361 (1) - the sound this is clicked on is really weak, and the slider end is much more dominant. think u could do a better job at representing this
04:24:617 - other points mentioned about the kiai previously apply here
04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - all the sounds are identical here, so having a finish only on 04:40:952 (1) - and a clap on 04:41:581 (1) - felt quite strange. why not use a whistle + finish for all of these?
04:42:209 (1,1) - clap is on 04:42:523 - not 04:42:209 . also 04:42:209 (1) - could do with some whistles on the reverses for the 1/4 sounds

going to pop the bubble for now, i feel some things could be improved and or discussed further generally regarding emphasis :3

Pentori wrote:

hi!

consider using hp 6? its a pretty streamy map so u have plenty of hp gain, and its 6.8 stars

yo i disagree with this , it maybe seem like its have so many hp gain , but as a player who would be able to play this map i tried this map a lot of times during the making process i wouldnt recommend a higher hp because the drain is very harsh especially on the spacious streams that could be fatal on silly mistakes , since the cs is indeed smaller than other deathstream maps
also scarlet is being kidnapped by japanese AV for 2 weeks so he wont be available rn Lo

I won't be available for some time. I'll try to find a cyber cafe and go through the mod. Expecting a somewhat late reply for the mod @@

Also, the reason why I put low HP has been explained by Rumia. It's easy to retain the HP, but it is also eazy to fail a stream too especially when comes to the spaced stream.

Pentori wrote:

hi!

consider using hp 6? its a pretty streamy map so u have plenty of hp gain, and its 6.8 stars
As explained above

[General]
some whistles at the start don't really feel like they're taking into account the songs melody. whistles such as 00:03:032 (2) - 00:04:290 (2) - 00:09:950 (1) - feel like they're placed just to have whistles on white ticks. i feel like it'd be better to give feedback on the most prominent sounds only, so i dont think the whistles are necessary. others include 00:13:226 (2) - 00:14:483 (1) - 00:15:741 (3) - 00:16:999 (2) - 00:18:294 (2) - 00:19:628 (2) - though you can do what works for you.

Yea, does sound nicer without forcing whistle on white ticks here

and if im not mistaken, isn't stuff like 01:11:017 - 01:13:530 - etc. missing a clap in every kiai?

It was suppose to have claps on 01:10:859 - but since it's covered by extended slider so I leave it aside. I simplified the hitsounding scheme for most of the part in this map, following simple rule like having claps on every two white ticks. I tried follow closely with claps on snares, but it sounds rather off and inconsistent as almost throughout the maps I've been using claps on two white ticks.

02:15:571 - 03:59:801 - i didnt really like how you randomly started introducing claps here >< this is still a build up section, so having the claps kinda ruined it
I think the introduction of claps fits nicer to show that this part becomes more intensive and stream heavy compare to the softer part from 02:10:231 (1) - 02:14:472 (2) -

[ONE DIMENSION]
00:29:443 - how come the hitsound volume jumps around so much here? it makes 00:30:400 - sound really loud compared to 00:31:016 . you should probably just stick to one volume
Not sure why either, made them consistent 30% volume
00:40:444 - ^ also just seems to get really quiet
^
01:08:975 (1,2) - rhythm seems quite awkward cause 01:09:367 (2) - doesn't actually exist. the melody starts from 01:09:446 - so it doesnt make much sense to prioritise 01:09:367 (2) - over 01:09:289 . could probably try a rhythm where 01:09:289 - is a clickable kickslider or something
Yup, made 01:09:289 - clikable
01:14:629 (2,3,4) - should probably reduce the spacing between 01:14:786 (3,4) - for proper emphasis
Reduced the spacing but kept the spacing 01:14:629 (2,3,4) - similar
01:15:414 (1,2,1,2,3) - the emphasis just seems so weird imo, it sounds like 01:15:571 (2,1,2) - is grouped together and 01:16:043 (3) - is accented in the music yet this is mapped to give priority to 01:15:571 (2) - instead. also the 1/4 on 01:16:200 (1,2,3,4,5) - kinda comes out of no where
Reworked this section
01:17:928 (7) - 01:18:556 (3) - 01:19:341 (9) - there are so many sounds covered by this pattern that barely receive any recognition. stuff like 01:18:006 (8) - 01:19:341 (9) - is just stuck in the midsts of a stream, perhaps using kick slider jumps could give them nice emphasis. and the way that 01:18:242 (1,2,3) - is designed/comboed makes 01:18:556 (3) - seem like it belongs to 01:18:242 (1,2) - yet these are very different :c
I guess the stream is fine since 01:17:928 - 01:19:341 (9) - doesn't really have prominent sound like 01:18:242 (1,2,3) - that needs 1/4 slider to emphasize it. As for second point, I made 01:18:242 (1,2,3) - equal spacing
01:25:938 (3) - clap should be on 01:26:095 (4) . listen closesly to the snares
I made this point about the claps in the statement above. Keeping the simple hitsound scheme which is claps at every two white ticks. If I were to follow the snares at 01:26:095 - , it will sound really off

Will continue replying to the mods in a moment when I got time

01:27:037 (2,3,4) - with patterns like 01:25:781 (2,3,4) - you made 4 stand out a lot, yet in this pattern the sound is the loudest but doesn't really get any emphasis at all. why not make this a slider extending from 01:27:352 - to 01:27:587 - ? the sound at 01:27:509 (1) - is relatively weak and can be skipped
Fixed, but made 01:27:352 (4) - 1/2 slider instead of 3/4
01:29:079 (1) - 01:29:708 (1) - dont think there are claps here
Yea, removed the claps
01:29:943 (4,1) - curve could look nicer with the shape of the stream
Hopefully is better now
01:30:022 (1,1) - idk dont u find the spacing here too small to have a proper effect? 01:40:074 (1,1) - seems like a much better alternative
Adjust the spacing a little, but it should be fine as it is
01:31:121 (5) - clap?
01:33:477 (4,1) - clap should be on 1
01:35:990 (3,4) - clap on 4. yea gonna stop pointing these out, see if u can double check hitsounds
Stated before regarding the clap hitsound. Wanted to keep the hitsound scheme simple, claps every 2 white ticks. Following the snares sounds really odd to me

01:50:441 (1,2) - would be nice to do something different here, since theres no sound on 01:50:755 - compared to the previous ones
Alright

01:59:236 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe a ctrl g'ed version of this would be more appropriate. after all, the pitch is lowering not rising
Alright

02:00:493 (1,1) - similar to points raised earlier, i reckon 02:00:493 (1) - could do with more spacing to stress it further and yea there isn't really anything on 02:00:807 (1) - so covering it with a slider end would express how the music momentarily stops
Good point, fixed!

02:05:205 (1,2,3,4,5) - the fact that u previously had slider streams for the piano 02:03:320 (1,2,3,4) - makes 02:05:205 (1,2,3,4,5) - way too overemphasised. same for 02:06:462 (1,2,3)
Not sure why suddenly I changed 02:03:320 - to 1/4. Converted them to 1/4 streams. Keeping the 02:05:205 (1,2,3) - following the 1/2 beat here

02:05:676 (4,5) - also it'd be nice to differentiate this with 02:06:933 (4,5) - since with the latter one has the piano supporting it
Both doesn't seem like it has clear piano though

02:07:718 (1,2,3) - 3 has piano but 1 and 2 dont. so i dont see the need for all of them to be kicksliders
The 3rd 1/4 slider is following the loud 1/2 beat. Prefer keeping the pattern a little consistent with the previous instead of following the piano

02:19:655 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - every 3rd note is emphasised here 02:19:891 (4) - 02:20:126 (3) - yet this is mapped like an ordinary stream in groups of 4. maybe you could reconsider the patterning/hitsounds
Nice one, fixed!

02:23:346 - pretty strong piano here, this would play better as a quintuplet
Sure

02:25:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - think u could do a better job at mapping the change in piano here, this sounds nothing like 02:25:310 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) . the things to highlight here would be 02:25:938 - 02:26:095 - 02:26:409 .
Hopefully is better now >>

02:36:618 - well, since this is really similar to the first kiai, the same points apply
Changed to quintuplet stream

03:00:336 (3) - could do a better job at emphasising this
Current one should be fine, emphasizing on the 3 1/2 beats

03:05:362 (1,2) - what calls for this to be a kick + circle when the others are 1/2 sliders? would make more sense to represent each equally imo
Not sure why I did this either. Simplify back to 1/2 slider

03:08:032 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - im not really sure where these 1/4s are coming from. its pretty much the same as whats represented by 03:07:090 (3)
Simplified this section

03:24:349 (1) - should end on red tick? sounds is much more dominant there
Yea, sounds better

03:41:895 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - piano sounds like 1/3 here
Hmm, alright fixed

04:03:884 - ye same as what was mentioned previously for this section
Fixed

04:23:361 (1) - the sound this is clicked on is really weak, and the slider end is much more dominant. think u could do a better job at representing this
Should be better now

04:24:617 - other points mentioned about the kiai previously apply here

04:40:952 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - all the sounds are identical here, so having a finish only on 04:40:952 (1) - and a clap on 04:41:581 (1) - felt quite strange. why not use a whistle + finish for all of these?
Whistle does sound nice, but finish is quite noisy tho

04:42:209 (1,1) - clap is on 04:42:523 - not 04:42:209 . also 04:42:209 (1) - could do with some whistles on the reverses for the 1/4 sounds
Sounds a lot nicer yea

going to pop the bubble for now, i feel some things could be improved and or discussed further generally regarding emphasis :3

Double posting

Reviving this, was hiatus for the past 5 months. Just came back actively few weeks ago. Hopefully able to progress this map towards qualification~

ye changes look ok. arent 03:05:833 - 03:06:462 - 04:51:319 - supposed to have claps
poke me when u get a bubble

Yea, forgot about these when I mirrored the sliders

Thanks!

rebubbled

ITS ALMOST TIME

gratzzzzzzzzz

gratz~~!@@~!~

grats thank for map