1. 01:19:639 (40) - I feel like this one as don represent the ascending guitare much better
2. 02:07:690 (55,56) - change those 2 notes into k ? too lazy to explain it, but I think you get it, with your spam k and dd structure (used for cymbal).
3. 03:22:557 (27) - change this one as d ? this k will get more emphasis & I think it follow better the ascending pitch of the guitar.
4. 04:17:127 (31,33) - with those 2 k, I don't really feel like this kdkk here 04:17:297 (33,34,35,36) - lose his emphasis. Maybe better to just change it as kkkk to feel the ascending guitare, or just change one or both 04:16:958 (29,31) - as d.

1. The guitar pitch is same as next one.
2. It is uncommon and kinda hand-shaking.
3. Sounds weird.

Kin wrote:

h o l a .
Just really few point.

[T A T S U J I N]

1. 01:19:639 (40) - I feel like this one as don represent the ascending guitare much better I feel like the slight crescendo is already represented well by the number of kats in each pattern (01:19:046 (33,34,35,36,37,38,39) - 2 kats; 01:19:724 (41,42,43,44,45,46,47) - 4 kats)
2. 02:07:690 (55,56) - change those 2 notes into k ? too lazy to explain it, but I think you get it, with your spam k and dd structure (used for cymbal).
3. 03:22:557 (27) - change this one as d ? this k will get more emphasis & I think it follow better the ascending pitch of the guitar. there are already less kats than the first part, I think it's well emphasized (btw it's descending lol)
4. 04:17:127 (31,33) - with those 2 k, I don't really feel like this kdkk here 04:17:297 (33,34,35,36) - lose his emphasis. Maybe better to just change it as kkkk to feel the ascending guitare, or just change one or both 04:16:958 (29,31) - as d. changed 32 to kat, for more ascending emphasis

don.

zigizigiefe wrote:

Since qualify post is here,I want to point out an issue for me.

00:26:164 (17) - Change as kat following these reasons:

1. The guitar pitch is same as next one. it's not. 00:26:164 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27) - check this arrangement and try to make your own conclusions.
2. It is uncommon and kinda hand-shaking. nope
3. Sounds weird. nope

Otherwise seems fine.

zigizigiefe wrote:

Well,maybe it might be awkward for drum based hitsounds but I want to elaborate.Such as 00:26:164 (17) - The guitar is different than 00:26:079 (16) - ,right?If you agree with me about this,you should show the difference between these two notes.When 00:26:164 (17) - is don,players would not see the difference in guitar sounds.
oops i am late,gratz

Surono wrote:

zigi pls

lets.....~~~~~~~~~

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Hitsounds from notes and sliders must be audible. These provide feedback for the player, and having them silent in a rhythm game doesn't make much sense. If you don't like the default sounds, then find replacements rather than silencing notes. You can use hitsounds from the Custom Hitsound Library or easily find others online. Lowering the volume of a few notes to provide a dampened effect is usually fine, but complete silence is always unacceptable. The end of a spinner (or even the entire spinner) the sliding sound of a slider, and the end of a slider can be silent, but only do it if it makes sense. Finally, you cannot silence both slider ticks and slider slides together.

OnosakiHito wrote:

Oh, I just played the beatmap and saw some responses here, so I wanted to hop in. It's nice to see that this gets mentioned.

I support Nardo on this one especially when considering that certain sliders become offbeat due to the previous placed 1/4 which triggers the hitbox bug. This makes it even harder to hit those sliders. Additionally, feedback for a gamemode like taiko is essential and can't be just ignored either. That's why the rule Nardo mentioned as back up is valid (which btw is not standard related as it is a general rule) and makes the beatmap in conclusion for the time being, unrankable.

My suggestion would be simply to rise the volume to 5%~10% to avoid these problems and have at least some feedback. Remember: Taiko does not have hold sliders and making it's sliders to some kind of these, goes against the technical purpose of these sliders as you don't hold them but actually still hit them per tick. Overall a nice idea, but goes against the modes and rules purpose.

Because of that, the set will be disqualified for now till said concerns are handeled.

Kin wrote:

Let's make this flame shine again.