Thanks :^Aloda wrote:
:eyes:
[diff name]
Again, I don't like the sv at 02:54:214 - It just feels kind of awkward dropping it a little then going back to normal so suddenly. Maybe you could increase it instead, or just remove it entirely. idk, for me it's nice as it is, maybe going to decrease the intensity a bit, because making the SV higher would overlap with the next little section of notes lol
04:25:560 - 04:37:868 - a few of the patterns in here are kind of unintuitive to play. Just looking at the blue-tick sounds you've mapped doublets too, it's pretty inconsistent in the way you've mapped to them. Just comparing something like 04:26:618 (150,151) - to 04:28:060 (159,160) - It's the same rhythm here in the song with a different pitch, so having it structured differently makes playing it feel really unintuitive and awkward in general. Then, in the second half of this section for the same rhythms, you've just used single notes 04:32:772 (191) - and 04:34:310 (201) -. I'd be okay with you using a more complex version of the same structure, but consistency is key. For example, if you just remove 04:32:387 (188) - and add a note at 04:32:675 - instead, it's a much more consistent structure here that plays pretty nicely. I agree, changed a bit the structure to be a bit more consistent
Sorry for being so petty about sv, but try making 07:10:031 - smoother, it seems quite sudden and I'd like it to be a more gradual change. Sure
That's all for now. Let me know when you've applied this and I'll take another look.
https://memenaait.s-ul.eu/vRUnwG47