Midnaait wrote:

Definitive BG :^



:eyes:



/me giggle

Aloda wrote:

:eyes:

[diff name]

Again, I don't like the sv at 02:54:214 - It just feels kind of awkward dropping it a little then going back to normal so suddenly. Maybe you could increase it instead, or just remove it entirely. idk, for me it's nice as it is, maybe going to decrease the intensity a bit, because making the SV higher would overlap with the next little section of notes lol

04:25:560 - 04:37:868 - a few of the patterns in here are kind of unintuitive to play. Just looking at the blue-tick sounds you've mapped doublets too, it's pretty inconsistent in the way you've mapped to them. Just comparing something like 04:26:618 (150,151) - to 04:28:060 (159,160) - It's the same rhythm here in the song with a different pitch, so having it structured differently makes playing it feel really unintuitive and awkward in general. Then, in the second half of this section for the same rhythms, you've just used single notes 04:32:772 (191) - and 04:34:310 (201) -. I'd be okay with you using a more complex version of the same structure, but consistency is key. For example, if you just remove 04:32:387 (188) - and add a note at 04:32:675 - instead, it's a much more consistent structure here that plays pretty nicely. I agree, changed a bit the structure to be a bit more consistent

Sorry for being so petty about sv, but try making 07:10:031 - smoother, it seems quite sudden and I'd like it to be a more gradual change. Sure

That's all for now. Let me know when you've applied this and I'll take another look.

Aloda wrote:

:eyes:

[Metadata]
You have 'Smash' and 'BGM' in the tags twice. ups

I'm just gonna assume the rest of the tags are good, there's a lot to check through XD

[diff name]
I get what you're mapping to with the finisher on 00:20:806 (3) - but really it's way more intuitive to play as a normal note. its fine for me since the bpm is low

00:41:487 (86,87,1) - The sv here makes this pattern pretty awkward to read, try toning it down a little. I also think kkD fits better here, if only because it makes the finisher a little easier to hit. right, 00:41:374 - added 1.05 and change that as kat to fit the similar sound around here such voice effect or rhythm

01:33:445 (29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38) - Maybe I'm just bad at 1/6 but this pattern feels pretty awkward to play to me. Maybe try changing 01:33:637 (31,32,33,34) - to kkdk or kkkd but idk maybe it's fine as is. its fine for me, it also 01:33:637 (31,34) - emphasized the impact voice then 01:33:701 (32,33) - these for low voice

04:05:560 (25,26,27,28,29,30) - Try k ddk d k, just fits better imo. I'd like to keep the current structure colors and also the emphasis of kkd pattern seems interesting at high percussion

06:37:147 - 07:07:916 - The gaps you've left in this section are pretty inconsistent, and the way they break up the rhythm honestly feels pretty weird. Try making them more regular and in line with the music. 06:38:300 - made the structures as K d K d K d K ddkkd K and the others i dont see problem with it,
since I intended to map some vocals and impact sounds with the gaps for variation

That's all for now. Let me know when you've applied this and I'll take another look.

Aloda wrote:

mmmmm Just a few things Anhgnhng

[a]
02:12:195 (4) - Remove? Fits the melody better and makes this a little nicer to play. pls, I focus Anikis voice :^)

05:29:791 (18) - remove finish? Feels pretty weird having it here and not at similar places elsewhere in the section (like 05:35:945 - etc). difference, the first intended for the strong vocal so yeah, not significant to emphasis/consistent which the second link you pointd out

06:37:147 - 07:07:916 - Mostly okay now but I'd like more consistency between the similar rhythms at 06:41:762 - 06:47:916 - k dk compared to K d K is pretty weird. its different emphasis, since the second rhythm intended for strong vocal so yeah da structures differ. I dont think about consistency but variation

lmk when you're done.

iloveyou4ever wrote:

no man in the BG 0/10

DE-CADE wrote:

Unsnapped timing lines :

07:41:762 fixed
08:31:089 it doesnt affect the gameplay except da above that makes error gameplay - _- but well fixed for N E A T

Good Luck.

and Srry i cant help you with my Penoz w

Stefan wrote:

F