1. Time Sakugo (7,18 stars, 2227 notes)

1. I think for this map need higher OD. 8.7-9
2. Sorry for my eng ;;

Nattu wrote:

sup! M4M

General:

1. I think for this map need higher OD. 8.7-9 Yeah you're right, changed
2. Sorry for my eng ;;

Time Sakugo:

00:20:324 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6964469 - mb stack? changed
00:25:424 (4,3) - ^ https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6964493 changed
00:26:324 (8,9) - big distance i think, ~4 will be good, + bad flow for next stream 00:26:624 (1,2,3,4,5) - No I think this spacing is good and plays how I want it to
00:26:924 (5,4) - stack? No this is the movement I want
00:27:374 (1,2,1) - ^ Imo it's not worth it to lose good spacing to make a perfect stack like that
00:28:424 (1,5) - ^ same here
00:30:749 (6,7,4) - blanket http://puu.sh/t9LMl/729520bf49.jpg changed spacing a bit
00:31:124 (3,4,5) - need stable distance between this elements, = 2DS changed
00:34:124 (5,6) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6964537, blanket 00:33:824 (1,6) - and 00:34:274 (6) - = 00:34:124 (5) - No I like the current feeling
00:35:324 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ again this pattern, i think you may improve this how in prev moment made it consistent with the previous one but I like the overlap's feeling
00:38:024 (5) - NC changed
00:38:924 (1) - NC off changed
00:44:624 (3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/t9Ncc/b240b756b7.jpg looks nice but that would ruin the spacing
00:48:824 (3) - this verysmall blanket rly ulgy :< http://puu.sh/t9NfN/acfd2aa4a9.jpg I like it, I want this strict blanket to give emphasis to the clean sound in this song's moment, when the song is not as "clean" I don't do clean blankets
00:51:074 (2,4) - stack http://puu.sh/t9Njc/655b927fb4.jpg moved up a bit so it's not in the middle but I don't want perfect stacks right after 00:51:224 (3)
00:54:974 (3,6) - stack Moved a bit but same as above
01:11:474 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/t9Nva/48ce1df58d.jpg i think it good changed this to something similar but more in tone with the map
01:17:024 (1,3) - bad overlap. need change flow changed
01:24:524 (5,1) - stack fixed aesthetics but not stacked
01:25:424 (7) - 139:222. overlap no need I like this spacing
01:27:524 (5,1) - ^ moved down a bit
01:29:774 (4,6,8) - http://puu.sh/t9NDD/0281b8efc6.jpg changed
01:34:724 (3,1) - stack fixed
01:34:574 (2,4,6) - http://puu.sh/t9NGw/c1ef6bf9fd.jpg moved a bit
01:36:524 (9,3) - stack changed
01:41:024 (3,5) - http://puu.sh/t9NKP/4360799774.jpg + blanket fix with (4) fixed
01:44:474 (2,5) - blanket fixed
01:53:024 (4,6) - stack I like this how it is
02:04:424 (3,4) - improve planteksliders http://puu.sh/t9NSw/92932e6458.jpg fixed
02:24:374 (2,6) - http://puu.sh/t9NVS/9b12d09450.jpg fixed
02:30:374 (7,3) - stack improved but not stacked
02:31:874 (1,2) - ctrl+g in rhytm I like this rhythm
02:35:624 (1,3) - stack changed but not stacked
02:53:624 (1,3) - bad overlap mb this? 02:52:724 (9,10,3,4,5,6,7) - http://puu.sh/t9OaG/0d230905a4.jpg improved a bit but I like the overlap
03:00:674 (2,1) - stack changed
03:03:974 (1,1) - improve blanket http://puu.sh/t9OdL/7fb6d4d693.jpg done
03:05:624 (4,5) - too ^ changed
03:09:374 (2,4,6) - http://puu.sh/t9Ogu/69c79303c7.jpg no, spacing here is really really important
03:13:874 (7,8) - ctrl+g in rhytm no this rhythm gives better emphasis to vocals
03:16:424 (1,2) - improve blanket done
04:00:074 (1,2,1,3) - http://puu.sh/t9OpZ/901d92ada1.jpg changed a bit
04:04:874 (2,3) - http://puu.sh/t9Os1/5f63cdf171.jpg changed
04:09:224 (1,3,2,1) - http://puu.sh/t9OxS/5972bc7fa9.jpg changed a bit
04:16:124 (3,4,1) - need stable distance improved it a bit but the emphasis is not the same so distance is 0,1x longer
04:42:224 (7) - http://puu.sh/t9OCx/7ddfb3403d.jpg fixed
04:42:374 (8,3,6) - http://puu.sh/t9ODY/48a2cc788a.jpg Improved this but that spacing would flow worse towards the next burst
04:44:024 (7) - http://puu.sh/t9OFN/4517fc4288.jpg fixed
04:44:324 (3,1) - stack fixed
04:54:974 (2,4) - improve blanket done
04:55:724 (1,4) - http://puu.sh/t9OKc/d97efcb72b.jpg
05:09:824 (1) - change this slider pls D: keeping it for now since I like the brief pause it gives since it plays like a slow slider and prepares for the jumps
05:43:424 (8,1) - improve blanket done
06:14:624 (1,2) - stack done

Good luck!

1. 00:20:324 (1,2,3,4) - 00:20:774 (1,2,3,4) - Same sound different spacing from 1 to 2, I personally think 00:20:774 (1) would look really good around x:374 and y:280
2. 00:23:624 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think this would look better below the 5, like so: http://gendo.s-ul.eu/aYAa4LlJ.png .
3. 00:38:624 (3,4) - I think these 2 are too close compared to the previous pattern.
4. 00:42:974 (2,3) - Really not a fan of this small awkward jump
5. 00:57:074 (1) - I'd put this note a tiny bit higher
6. 01:00:599 (1) - Could remove this note, since it's kinda overmapped and clustered and there is no sound starting there.
7. 01:12:674 (2,1) - I'd stack these, so 01:12:674 (2) - blankets better as well.
8. 01:34:574 (2) - Put at x:252 y:151 to space it better between 01:35:174 (6,2) , looks a bit better.
9. 01:42:224 (6,7) - I'd chang ethis pattern, it's so weird to look at.
10. 01:44:399 - Missing rather important sounds on every blue tick in this part, I don't know how you could fix this, but I'm just telling you.
11. 01:47:324 (4) - I feel like this jump shouldn't become smaller, and especially this 4 looks really awkward. I think either constant spacing or increasing spacing would work better in this build up.
12. 02:05:624 (3,4,5,6,7) - Couldn't you blanket this around 02:04:424 (3) - would looke nice, because you could have a stream in the shape of 02:04:874 (4), which would make it look like a clean pattern
13. --- I randomly took a break from modding here, so maybe you fixed something I pointed out in the previous part already... ---
14. 02:09:524 (7) - Offscreen slider, unrankable.
15. 02:12:749 (2,3,1,1) - Not really like this really small spacing.
16. 02:17:924 (1,2,3,4) - Realllyyyy difficult to read, maybe remove NC from 02:17:924 (1) - and NC 02:18:224 (2) - instead? Would make it easier to read but would be quite a weird way of NCing
    Another way of fixing this would be stacking (1,2) like you did here 02:22:724 (2,1,2,3) - (kinda)
17. 02:45:974 (6,7,8,1) - Not sure how well this flows.
18. 02:50:474 (1) - I don't think this slider should start on this redtick. Could maybe make it a triple ? 02:50:774 (2,3) - Same sound but this is a triple.
19. 03:02:624 (1,1,2,3,4) - Never really a fan of having streams start at the end of a slider, but that's just 100% personal opinion
20. 03:03:674 (1,1,1) - Could be further to the right, since 03:03:374 (6,1) - is a rather strong sound, so more spacing would fit.
21. If you don't change the above, maybe look at this blanket 03:04:424 (2) , it's off but maybe it's as intended.
22. 03:13:574 (5,6) - This doesn't sound like 1/4 sliders
23. 03:30:374 (1) - Don't like how these are overlapping, consider putting it a tinyyy bit higher.
24. 03:43:499 (5,4) - Overlap is slighty off if that is what you intended.
25. 03:56:924 (2,3) - Maybe make it evenly spaced to both 1 and 4?
26. 04:04:424 (1) - 04:53:324 - This entire build up.... SO GOOD
27. 04:56:324 (4,5,6) - Think it would be better to put 6 a bit further to the lower left to create an even spacing.
28. I think stacking 05:39:674 (1,2,3) - on 05:38:924 (9,1) - would look really nice.
29. 05:59:324 (5,6,7) - I would space these more.
30. 06:12:224 (5) - Offscreen slider, unrankable.

GenDoNL wrote:

Helo

[Time Sakugo]

1. 00:20:324 (1,2,3,4) - 00:20:774 (1,2,3,4) - Same sound different spacing from 1 to 2, I personally think 00:20:774 (1) would look really good around x:374 and y:280 changed
2. 00:23:624 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think this would look better below the 5, like so: http://gendo.s-ul.eu/aYAa4LlJ.png . changed
3. 00:38:624 (3,4) - I think these 2 are too close compared to the previous pattern. changed a bit but the spacing is decreasing for a better entrance into the stream
4. 00:42:974 (2,3) - Really not a fan of this small awkward jump I think it gives good emphasis and plays good for me
5. 00:57:074 (1) - I'd put this note a tiny bit higher changed a bit but any higher would ruin the cursor movement to the next slider
6. 01:00:599 (1) - Could remove this note, since it's kinda overmapped and clustered and there is no sound starting there. This one is hard to explain but it's kinda like "rolling" with the vocals, it starts a beat before but the stream builds up for the slider with that burst
7. 01:12:674 (2,1) - I'd stack these, so 01:12:674 (2) - blankets better as well. changed
8. 01:34:574 (2) - Put at x:252 y:151 to space it better between 01:35:174 (6,2) , looks a bit better. may look a bit better but flows worse for me, I changed it a tiny bit tho
9. 01:42:224 (6,7) - I'd chang ethis pattern, it's so weird to look at. Not sure what you mean but I moved 7 down so it flows better
10. 01:44:399 - Missing rather important sounds on every blue tick in this part, I don't know how you could fix this, but I'm just telling you. I'm aware of that beat but I don't think it's an important sound for the build up I'm making so I decided to not map it and make the section play better
11. 01:47:324 (4) - I feel like this jump shouldn't become smaller, and especially this 4 looks really awkward. I think either constant spacing or increasing spacing would work better in this build up. You're right it felt a bit more awkward than I intended it to, moved it down
12. 02:05:624 (3,4,5,6,7) - Couldn't you blanket this around 02:04:424 (3) - would looke nice, because you could have a stream in the shape of 02:04:874 (4), which would make it look like a clean pattern That would destroy the flow and feeling, and you know I'm not a fan of "clean" mapping in this kind of song
13. --- I randomly took a break from modding here, so maybe you fixed something I pointed out in the previous part already... ---
14. 02:09:524 (7) - Offscreen slider, unrankable. changed
15. 02:12:749 (2,3,1,1) - Not really like this really small spacing. I think it's nice
16. 02:17:924 (1,2,3,4) - Realllyyyy difficult to read, maybe remove NC from 02:17:924 (1) - and NC 02:18:224 (2) - instead? Would make it easier to read but would be quite a weird way of NCing
    Another way of fixing this would be stacking (1,2) like you did here 02:22:724 (2,1,2,3) - (kinda) yea changed it to the later
17. 02:45:974 (6,7,8,1) - Not sure how well this flows. Fun flow for me, I think it works nicely
18. 02:50:474 (1) - I don't think this slider should start on this redtick. Could maybe make it a triple ? 02:50:774 (2,3) - Same sound but this is a triple. It's not the same sound, in the first slider the vocals take priority over other sounds so it uses curved slider, the next one was mistakenly a curved slider too so I changed it to red node instead
19. 03:02:624 (1,1,2,3,4) - Never really a fan of having streams start at the end of a slider, but that's just 100% personal opinion I know what you mean but I think this is the rhythm I should use and it's a 7* map so it shouldn't really be a problem
20. 03:03:674 (1,1,1) - Could be further to the right, since 03:03:374 (6,1) - is a rather strong sound, so more spacing would fit. I would agree if the sound was different but I feel like those beats are so much better played with a "stop motion"
21. If you don't change the above, maybe look at this blanket 03:04:424 (2) , it's off but maybe it's as intended. changed
22. 03:13:574 (5,6) - This doesn't sound like 1/4 sliders Vocal emphasis + drum beat, I like this
23. 03:30:374 (1) - Don't like how these are overlapping, consider putting it a tinyyy bit higher. moved a bit but I really don't want to ruin the flow towards next slider, spacing takes priority here
24. 03:43:499 (5,4) - Overlap is slighty off if that is what you intended. really tiny detail, stacking would do worse to aesthetics than leaving it like this, tried to move it a bit tho
25. 03:56:924 (2,3) - Maybe make it evenly spaced to both 1 and 4? changed a bit but I'm not a fan of even spacing for these unequal sounds
26. 04:04:424 (1) - 04:53:324 - This entire build up.... SO GOOD thanks a lot \:D/
27. 04:56:324 (4,5,6) - Think it would be better to put 6 a bit further to the lower left to create an even spacing. oops fixed
28. I think stacking 05:39:674 (1,2,3) - on 05:38:924 (9,1) - would look really nice. 100% right, not sure why I never did that
29. 05:59:324 (5,6,7) - I would space these more. good catch! fixed
30. 06:12:224 (5) - Offscreen slider, unrankable. fixed

xd