Hobbes2 wrote:@Atsuro Alright, fair enough.
Generally I feel like patterns could do more with what the music provides. ex: 00:07:437 - is clearly a more pronounced sound than 00:06:989 - but the spacing is the same due to the geometric pattern. Having an increase in spacing just doesnt feel right to me because, while it's more pronounced, it's not really a strong note that warrants a big change (contrary to this one 00:08:780 (6) - ). Having the slow slider i think is enough to represent this properly i think
Also this diff feels inconsistent in parts with similar music having big changes in the patterns, like 00:11:019 (4,5,6,7) - has a spaicng increase to 5 when 00:27:138 (1,2,3,4) - has it to 3 when the music doesn't really justify such a change. It's not the same part exactly, this 00:27:138 - would be the same notes as 00:12:810 - and, while those are sliders, it gives the same notes the most emphasis. 00:11:019 (4,5,6,7) - These are the same as 00:25:347 (3,4,5,6) - which are placed in a similar way (jump on the second note and same spacing on last three). All said i did find some inconsistencies that i ended up fixing (00:18:183 (4,5,6,7) - this aa)
A neat diff in terms of its construction but I think these issues warrant further discussion. All of this being said it's not THAT bad so I may be fine with bubbling given a good response.
Update: https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B1A_nVu ... jZJcFlLMVE