Hobbes2 wrote:

@Atsuro Alright, fair enough.

Generally I feel like patterns could do more with what the music provides. ex: 00:07:437 - is clearly a more pronounced sound than 00:06:989 - but the spacing is the same due to the geometric pattern. Having an increase in spacing just doesnt feel right to me because, while it's more pronounced, it's not really a strong note that warrants a big change (contrary to this one 00:08:780 (6) - ). Having the slow slider i think is enough to represent this properly i think

Also this diff feels inconsistent in parts with similar music having big changes in the patterns, like 00:11:019 (4,5,6,7) - has a spaicng increase to 5 when 00:27:138 (1,2,3,4) - has it to 3 when the music doesn't really justify such a change. It's not the same part exactly, this 00:27:138 - would be the same notes as 00:12:810 - and, while those are sliders, it gives the same notes the most emphasis. 00:11:019 (4,5,6,7) - These are the same as 00:25:347 (3,4,5,6) - which are placed in a similar way (jump on the second note and same spacing on last three). All said i did find some inconsistencies that i ended up fixing (00:18:183 (4,5,6,7) - this aa)

A neat diff in terms of its construction but I think these issues warrant further discussion. All of this being said it's not THAT bad so I may be fine with bubbling given a good response.

Hobbes2 wrote:

Summary of discussion I had with most of the qats

1) There's an issue brought up that the lower diffs are redundant; as in, the design of the lower diffs don't differ enough to warrant their existence. I'd be more than happy to vary my pattern choice separate my diffs by making them more original, but the process of remodding I think is just so extra. As No Title has the same extra at least more than twice.

2) I believe nobody said that it isn't inherently unrankable as is, but most agreed it didn't seem very reasonable. With the huge growth of million gd spreads I can see why this is getting annoying. But I made this before those were popular sheerly because I wanted to give people as many ways to enjoy the song, as it is my absolute favorite from this whole series.

Thoughts? Obviously given my star I think the spread should be fine but I can see the arguments against it.

Irreversible wrote:

My point of view on that is like... is it really necessary? It does seem really redundant in most of the cases. Obviously, there can be the argument as to "why do you need so many extras?" But imo that's something else, because people most of the times have different styles, which is actually hard to say in those easy diffs.

You could deifnitely ditch some of the very first diffs, because I do not see too much benefit of having so many similar diffs.
Beginner really does not offer a lot, apart from the sliders which follow the music in an interesting way, but this can be found in Easy as well, for example.

If you could elaborate on what exactly makes each diff unique, then please go ahead and I might be able to see your point of view!

Irreversible wrote:

The more we can agree on a compromise, the better. So if you could do things to fix the problem as good as possible, then that's the best solution!

I advise against comparing to other mapsets though, cuz we look at this mapset how it is right now, and not how 300 other mapsets were or currently are (at which you should state your opinion immediately, if you find something).

Hobbes2 wrote:

remove me from tags

00:07:437 (12) - and shouldnt the tail of this be silenced, noisy hitsound on nothing is kinda meh (topdiff)

Hobbes2 wrote:

b

Sinnoh wrote:

should add PolkaMocha to the tags

1. Check soft-hitwhistle.wav, seems it might have a small delay

1. 01:03:407 (1) - feels a little on the short end, could you snap it to the 1/4 before for a little extra time?

1. 00:18:183 (2) - Shape feels a little tight for this diff, could you unfold it a bit more?
2. 01:02:959 (1) - Never did 2 measure NC's before this, imo you could un-NC this just fine

1. 00:58:482 (5,6,1) - Rhythm variation here from 00:21:765 (3,4,1) - feels a bit weird, since it's a short and simple song just keeping this the same rhythmically would be more fitting imo

1. 00:58:034 (6) - reverse like at 00:22:213 (7) - ?

1. 00:14:601 (3,1) - blanket pls

1. 00:10:124 (2,3) - IMO spacing here is way too big, even following DS, compare to 00:53:109 (2,3) - something is off. http://puu.sh/z6MAh/d7329a169f.jpg

1. 00:18:183 (4,5) - Feels weird to stack these given 00:16:392 (1,2) - aren't

1. 00:28:929 (5) - Curious, why go with a slowdown here? Missing all the 1/2 slider action you had before

1. As for the highest diff, I like the lengthy combos idk why adds to the aesthetic if that remotely makes any sense.
2. As for the 2/1 rhythms in earlier difficulties, note the slider shapes that capture covered melodies via red anchors. I had to keep density low and include sliders. So it's natural certain things get covered up.

Plaudible wrote:

helo here to help u rank qt song qt set

Atsuro's Hyper

1. 00:28:929 (5) - Curious, why go with a slowdown here? Missing all the 1/2 slider action you had before It's consistent with the other ones,
   or you're talking about spacing?