hey! m4m thing
1:45
00:00:721 - why won't you map those? feels a bit empty for the highest diff
00:08:780 (13) - 270 56 works better I think, would have an equal distance between 12-13 and 13-1
00:13:706 (9) - y:285 plz cause now it's 1 grid above (8)
00:16:392 (1,2,3) - the distance between 2 and 3's heads looks bigger than between 1 and 2 which didn't happen before, consider moving 3 closer to 2
00:46:840 (4,5,6) - that's like the only time you use such pattern where 3 is between 1 and 2, and I see no reason to do that lol
neat
1:40
00:03:855 (3,4) - ehhh this is really subjective but I don't really like the jump, a pattern like 00:05:646 (1,2,3,4) - would fit better imo
00:08:780 (6,1) - y u stack those? 1 gets almost no emphasis, plus you're using a different pattern at 00:15:945 (4,1) - which I like more
00:17:288 (2,3) - blanket looks a bit off
00:20:870 (3,4,5) - making this a triangle doesn't make much sense to me since 5 is clearly a different sound which you've emphasized more earlier
00:32:959 (4,5) - plz blanket this, looks messy
1:32
that sure was a sudden transition from cs5.5 to cs3.5 LOL
maybe buff it to like 4.5?
00:09:676 (2) - I'd mirror this to 404 20 (or smth like this), right now this might be a bit hard to read and 5-1-2 won't be too flow-breaking
also if you do this you can do the similar thing to 00:11:467 (5) - and blanket it with 6
00:13:706 (2,3) - please don't ;_; at least make this a blanket
00:18:183 (4,5) - .. a stack out of nowhere? why?
1:31
nice diff
1:30
00:02:959 (2,3) - why is this the only stacked pattern lol later you always space them
00:14:153 (2) - pls consider splitting this into two circles, the sliderend is a pretty strong sound
or, if you don't want to, use a pattern like this 00:19:974 (1,2) - fits better imo
00:55:795 (1,2) - ^
1:20
00:05:198 (5,1) - yep this is subjective as well but I'd not stack those
00:16:392 (1,2) - ctrl-g pls fits the music better
00:26:691 (5,1) - y is dis one different from stuff like 00:19:527 (5,1) -
00:58:034 (4,1) - ehhh try making this one overlap in the centre of 1?
1:19
00:08:780 (4,1) - mentioned this above, such stack leaves 1 with almost no emphasis
00:17:287 (1) - um what is that nc
00:42:362 (2,3,4) - eh I'd make this one a triangle to follow the music better
00:58:034 (1) - remove nc
eh this song is so calm and so hard to mod
gl!
1:45
00:00:721 - why won't you map those? feels a bit empty for the highest diff
00:08:780 (13) - 270 56 works better I think, would have an equal distance between 12-13 and 13-1
00:13:706 (9) - y:285 plz cause now it's 1 grid above (8)
00:16:392 (1,2,3) - the distance between 2 and 3's heads looks bigger than between 1 and 2 which didn't happen before, consider moving 3 closer to 2
00:46:840 (4,5,6) - that's like the only time you use such pattern where 3 is between 1 and 2, and I see no reason to do that lol
neat
1:40
00:03:855 (3,4) - ehhh this is really subjective but I don't really like the jump, a pattern like 00:05:646 (1,2,3,4) - would fit better imo
00:08:780 (6,1) - y u stack those? 1 gets almost no emphasis, plus you're using a different pattern at 00:15:945 (4,1) - which I like more
00:17:288 (2,3) - blanket looks a bit off
00:20:870 (3,4,5) - making this a triangle doesn't make much sense to me since 5 is clearly a different sound which you've emphasized more earlier
00:32:959 (4,5) - plz blanket this, looks messy
1:32
that sure was a sudden transition from cs5.5 to cs3.5 LOL
maybe buff it to like 4.5?
00:09:676 (2) - I'd mirror this to 404 20 (or smth like this), right now this might be a bit hard to read and 5-1-2 won't be too flow-breaking
also if you do this you can do the similar thing to 00:11:467 (5) - and blanket it with 6
00:13:706 (2,3) - please don't ;_; at least make this a blanket
00:18:183 (4,5) - .. a stack out of nowhere? why?
1:31
nice diff
1:30
00:02:959 (2,3) - why is this the only stacked pattern lol later you always space them
00:14:153 (2) - pls consider splitting this into two circles, the sliderend is a pretty strong sound
or, if you don't want to, use a pattern like this 00:19:974 (1,2) - fits better imo
00:55:795 (1,2) - ^
1:20
00:05:198 (5,1) - yep this is subjective as well but I'd not stack those
00:16:392 (1,2) - ctrl-g pls fits the music better
00:26:691 (5,1) - y is dis one different from stuff like 00:19:527 (5,1) -
00:58:034 (4,1) - ehhh try making this one overlap in the centre of 1?
1:19
00:08:780 (4,1) - mentioned this above, such stack leaves 1 with almost no emphasis
00:17:287 (1) - um what is that nc
00:42:362 (2,3,4) - eh I'd make this one a triangle to follow the music better
00:58:034 (1) - remove nc
eh this song is so calm and so hard to mod
gl!