Mitkoff wrote:

P A N wrote:

your map is the 5th map after I post so here is my mod How is it even work?

1. 00:14:563 - try adding a note here for the vocals
2. 00:17:306 - same
3. 00:20:049 - same
4. 00:26:220 (3) - try putting it somewhere on the other side to flow better with the next slider http://puu.sh/uH6Sk/209dd6ca4c.jpg
5. 00:28:449 (1) - try using a 1/2 slider instead of just a circle, as the vocal is two syllables and lands on the red tick
6. 00:28:963 - ehhh for a long vocal like this, its usually better to try to map some other sounds instead, especially on higher difficulties. This is not very engaging for players of this level.
7. 00:31:877 (2,3) - maybe you should use the same 1/4 ds as earlier
8. 00:33:934 (1,1) - try using the same rhythm for these parts as they are basically the same sound lol
9. 00:37:363 (3,1) - this can be difficult to properly judge the timing as I think most players will be expecting a 1/1 timing between objects due to the rhythm of the previous patterns like 00:34:620 (4,1) - etc. I suggest adding a note at 00:38:049 -
10. 00:40:106 (3,1) - same
11. 00:48:848 (5,1) - why the random bent sliders though. 00:51:592 (6,1) - this is the same thing and its not bent
12. 00:51:934 (1,3) - blanket is off
13. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no need to use so many whistles, it sounds pretty awful especially since the custom hs is so strong. I think one every red tick would be great. also even though there are whistles lets not forget to add the claps too
14. 01:05:134 (1,3) - swap NC
15. 01:05:820 (1) - remove nc
16. 01:13:878 (7,8) - maybe this one should be a slider too to match the instrumental in this section. compare with 01:08:049 (6,7,8) -
17. 01:20:563 - comparing this section to 01:28:792 - the music is basicaly very similar, drums are the same and rap is almost the same. however, your map changes from all 1/2 patterns to lots of 1/4 patterns here and there. I think you should try to use a more consistant style between these similar parts of the song, you can try adding some triples to the first part or removing them from the second one.
18. 01:31:877 (1) - delete NC

eeezzzeee wrote:

Hello Hello O/
NM from my queue

[Insane]

1. 00:14:563 - try adding a note here for the vocals
2. 00:17:306 - same
3. 00:20:049 - same I don't want overmap the beginning, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ , it's a bit too much imo
4. 00:26:220 (3) - try putting it somewhere on the other side to flow better with the next slider http://puu.sh/uH6Sk/209dd6ca4c.jpg let it be
5. 00:28:449 (1) - try using a 1/2 slider instead of just a circle, as the vocal is two syllables and lands on the red tick let it be
6. 00:28:963 - ehhh for a long vocal like this, its usually better to try to map some other sounds instead, especially on higher difficulties. This is not very engaging for players of this level. No changes for now
7. 00:31:877 (2,3) - maybe you should use the same 1/4 ds as earlier already done
8. 00:33:934 (1,1) - try using the same rhythm for these parts as they are basically the same sound lol i don't get it they are the same...
9. 00:37:363 (3,1) - this can be difficult to properly judge the timing as I think most players will be expecting a 1/1 timing between objects due to the rhythm of the previous patterns like 00:34:620 (4,1) - etc. I suggest adding a note at 00:38:049 - Honestly i thought the same at the beginning, but after some test plays i was confused... Some people were say to delete note at 00:38:049 - some were fine with it. I have not big counting of opinions ,but looks like: as high rank player as more chance to expecting down beat note. It make sense as Insane diff, but maybe not bad to make diff more playable for all players, hmmm. Actually this sounds pretty weak and not even close to strong vocal wich place nearly close, so... For diffently gameplay i keep it, at least for now.
10. 00:40:106 (3,1) - same ^
11. 00:48:848 (5,1) - why the random bent sliders though. 00:51:592 (6,1) - this is the same thing and its not bent Yep, they were bent earlier, removed now.
12. 00:51:934 (1,3) - blanket is off fixed
13. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no need to use so many whistles, it sounds pretty awful especially since the custom hs is so strong. I think one every red tick would be great. also even though there are whistles lets not forget to add the claps too good point
14. 01:05:134 (1,3) - swap NC okie
15. 01:05:820 (1) - remove nc ^
16. 01:13:878 (7,8) - maybe this one should be a slider too to match the instrumental in this section. compare with 01:08:049 (6,7,8) - It sounds differently for me Orz, thats why i changed rhytm
17. 01:20:563 - comparing this section to 01:28:792 - the music is basicaly very similar, drums are the same and rap is almost the same. however, your map changes from all 1/2 patterns to lots of 1/4 patterns here and there. I think you should try to use a more consistant style between these similar parts of the song, you can try adding some triples to the first part or removing them from the second one.
    I don't know how correctly explain the idea here in English hmmm. My knowledge is pretty poor as You can notice. I'll try anyway.
    So, as You said i tried carefully follow vocal in my map. There is 3 part of "rap flow" in 01:20:563 - 01:38:392 . I mean 3 kind of emphraise text.
    1st part 01:20:563 - 3 times 8/1 parts with constant 1/2 rhytm, we have mapped only 1/2 notes.
    2nd part 01:28:792 - 1/2 rhythm overloads a lot of s/h sounds wich make "(vocal) flow" more tense and smooth, i am tring to emphraise it with a lot of new 1/4s.
    3rd part 01:34:277 - and finally rest part wich uses pauses in vocal flow like 01:35:477 - and 01:36:849 -. We have a good moment for variativity and i emphraise diferences between heavy (01:28:792 -) and calm (01:34:277 -) sections.
    I know it's not best variation of map it, but i feel it like i described it...
    
    About a lot of missed 1/4s, i wanted to map all stuff in Extra diff, but my imagination hurt me especially for the beggining parts. Also my ability mapping Extra sucks xD. I haven't smthng decent for Ex now. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Yeah, bad news for mapset at all...
    
18. 01:31:877 (1) - delete NC done

Shapes and object placement can use more polishing but I think the biggest problem preventing this from being a great map is the constant 1/2 rhythm that is used during parts that have many 1/4 and other possible sounds too. It makes for a bland playing experience and does not represent the song well imo.

Some general ideas about how to improve the rhythms used in this map:

i see that you are trying to closely follow the vocals whenever they are present, but that ends up neglecting the drums and instruments. you should try to include those too whenever possible to make a more complete map of the music provided. also having more variety in the rhythm of the map makes for a more interesting playing experience.

For example, 01:20:905 (2,3,4) - its quite obvious that between the objects there is drum on the blue ticks. as you probably know, dnb emphasizes the drums! so maybe your map should include them too xd

also try to avoid empty spaces during very intense parts of the song like 01:35:477 -

That's all from me. Don't give up! Fighting! c:

Loreley wrote:

m4m https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506551 (да, она не моя, моддишь только последнюю диффу)

• 
  [Insane]

1. 00:19:535 (5,1) - 00:16:792 (5,1) - ты тут игоришь вокал на красных тиках, хоть основной инструмент в этой части - это вокал, так что просто поставь туда серклы, ну, и во всех подобных моментах. По идее, я хотел оттенить сильные доли от слабых, но кажись это никого не ебет
2. 00:21:249 (3,1) - странная пауза, чтобы не сбиться с ритма, можно поставить серкл на белый тик, там есть какой-то звук Очень слабый звук,честно , не думаю, что тут очень сложно сбиться с ритма
3. 00:22:449 (2) - а из этого сделать слайдер, так как он лучше выделяет вокал(вот тут дропается звук 00:22:792 (3) - ), и слайдер этот лучше замедлить.
4. 00:23:649 (2) - вообще, не люблю маленькие вейв-слайдеры, потому что они все по-ублюдски смотрятся, но если делать правильно, то лучше вот так http://puu.sh/uLRHp/1d6446c9dc.png ( но я бы вообше его заменил) Мне нравятся
5. 00:24:334 (1) - а еще вейвы эстетически хуево смотрятся под таким углом, обычно их применяет только вертикально или горизонтальнос небольшим наклоном
6. 00:28:963 (2) - ну мы же в 2к17, можно и что-нибудь поинтереснее придумать, чем дугу Ну что-то типа того, по эститике правда все рано слабовато
7. 01:00:506 (8) - слишком маленький спейсинг для этого 1/1 бита апнул до предыдущих
8. 01:45:249 (1) - поправить оффскрин бы опустил немного
9. 01:58:620 (5,2) - пониже опустить 5 и ctrl+g для кругового, а значит более удобного флоу Я умышленно не стал тут крутить, до этого слишком много крутили

Phyloukz wrote:

Hello

Insane

00:11:992 (1,2) - i feel like theres a bit off a missemphasis: as you can hear the sounds at 00:12:506 - and 00:13:020 - are really strong (stronger than the sounds you covered with the sliderheads) and currently covered by slidertails (slidertails have the weakest emphasis) which leads to the missemphasis. try to make those 2 sounds clickable
00:15:763 (3) - the same thing appears here. additionally the vocalist pitches her voice up so it should be even more emphasized. Feels fine actually, let's see, i remember it

00:14:563 - i recommend to place circle here for the vocal
00:20:049 - same Nope

00:22:449 (2) - maybe a 1/1 slider to the next red tick instead? for the vocal at the red tick 00:22:792 - Did You test it? it sounds cool, but i'm personaly confuses when i place 1/1 slider here

00:28:963 (2) - i dont see this slider fitting. i see that u wanted to map the vocal here but during the slider she (vocalist) changes her voice, like its not a continously sound- it gets changed (also you are missing a couple sounds too which should not be missed imo) Yep and i still want to keep it. Imo makes emphasis uncommon things is much more important than follow to common 1/1 rhythm

00:33:592 - maybe you can add a slight slider velocity decrease for this slider. i think it fits pretty well here (also NC it then). just a suggestion Yep, sounds cool

00:38:049 - i disagree missing this beat. i would just make 00:37:363 (3) - this a reverse slider so you cover the less important beat with a slidertail. same for 00:40:106 (3) - with unclicable beat i agreed, let it be

00:43:619 (2,3,4) - this flows awkwardly hmm, this sounds unclear

01:19:705 (7) - nc for what?

01:57:248 (5,3) - stack eventually for better structure i changed pattern here so...

02:07:192 - make the spinner end with 5% volume. really noisy sound for not having a sound there Not sure about 5% hmmm it's pretty noticable sound here, but let it be lower

i suck at hard sorry ><

normal

general: i'm a bit concerned about the settings you chose here - you have 1.2x slider velocity and a consistent distance snap of x0.9 which is kinda awkward to play because the sliders have a very fast movement while the movement between each object is really slow (because of the low DS). thats really confusing for newbies and im not sure if you can keep this setting. A simple 1.0 slider velocity and x1.0 DS (+/- x0.2) is rather appropriate. id recommend you to decrease the sv by 0.2 i''l keep it for now, i guess. i have some reason for this settings, also i know some ranked Normal maps with this concept.
This diff is almost hard according osu!system, btw

00:15:763 (3,4) - in low diffs you should avoid this because the sliderend is not pointing to the next object. sure you can use this element for emphasis but you shouldnt do that with the exact opposite direction. kk
00:27:077 (3,1) - same for this, you get it i think

00:43:192 - the soudn changes here so therfore it should be clickable it's normal so, can't uses unconstant rhythm

00:44:906 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you constantly switch between very dense 1/2 rhythm and really slow rhythm. I dont know, i think its not a good thing since the music feels pretty much same intense in that section i don't see any hard to catch things so, tried to follow vocals with constant rhytm and that's it
01:15:764 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - the same problem appears here: you take away the rhythm density (of 1/2 rhythms) for no reason. or at least i can see no reason to because the music doesnt get slower and less intense in any way.. >< emphasis overstrong beats

01:21:420 (3,4) - why do u suddenly decide to stack those? i would rather recommend to make it consistent, so either space it or stack in throughout the map - just to be moire straightforward for newbs For newbs i have easy... i did it for gameplay variavity....

01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - newbies get problems here because they have to react very quickly to the reverses (since they appear multiple times they have to react even faster) so they will most likely miss at that point. you should search for a different rhythm here You know i used 01:22:620 (6,6,6) - this sliders not for just to be, it should be preparation for this pattern. Player already knows how to cath it and it's should be much easier. Also i have some test plays from inexperienced players, thats was like 90% to FC moment.

01:38:392 (1,2,3) - this looks pretty neat at first view but theoretically the player has to do sudden movement changes to the right (so the players does down - right - down - right - down and that with a sharp 90° angle at 1/2 rhythm). thats really awkward and difficult movement i nerfed angle to 60

01:55:535 (2,2) - unintended overlap avoid it

02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - and here you take away the density again, although this feels really intense (at least if u ask me) emphasis overstrong beats again

ok i hope my random mod gives you a few ideas that can improve your map!
i dont actually know where i picked this map up ><

Good Luck on further process! :3

1. Maximum rankable audio bitrate is 192kbps.

1. 00:14:734 (1,2) - It would be nice if you could blanket this so (1) wraps around the head of (2) evenly.
2. 00:45:592 (1,2,1) - 3/2 beat spacing is hard for beginners to read, especially when you mix it with 2/1 beat spacing like 00:47:649 (1,2) so I would recommend choosing a different rhythm.
3. 01:27:763 (4) - Missing clap.
4. Many of the blankets in the map could be cleaner.

1. 00:21:592 (4) - Inconsistent distance spacing before and after.
2. 00:44:220 (2,1) - Would look neater if they weren't so close together.
3. 00:58:963 (2,3) - This angle is awkward imo. Why not make it smooth (1,2,3) or stack (2,3)? Same at 01:09:935 (2,3)
4. 01:04:106 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm would fit the music better since it emphasizes the strong drum on 01:04:449 http://puu.sh/uX0hW/ad8ae8882f.jpg

1. 01:00:506 (6) - Use round slider (not bezier) so you can make a cleaner blanket.
2. 01:15:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This feels kinda weird to play since there's no significant indication in the music for why (5) should be emphasized by unstack. Maybe go for something with (3,4) and (5,6) stacked: http://puu.sh/uX0CE/0a9bfe8fb3.jpg

1. 01:22:277 (2) - Unsnapped.
2. 01:28:192 (6) - Unsnapped.
3. 01:54:334 (5,6) - This slider end stack is kind of unexpected since you didn't use it anywhere else in the map. I think you should just unstack it or make it a 1/4 beat triple.

Hobbes2 wrote:

m4m

[Easy]

00:11:991 (1) - I think it would be better if you captured the synth sound, so a 3/2 reverse slider instead. it breaks intro's consistency
00:45:592 (1,2) - blanket k
01:38:392 (3,1) - stack k

solid diff I guess, blankets need work throughout. It's not that they're necessarily bad, but you should keep them consistent so that the map looks cleaner. As in, make sure the gaps between the objects is the same for all of them. i'll recheck it

[Normal]

00:13:363 (4,5) - Better if it flows. Also it's a bit misleading how far apart these are, it might be DS'd properly but because of 00:13:363 (4) - 's sliderbody they look closer together. perhaps, i changed it
00:22:963 (1,3) - try a better blanket - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669717 okay
00:38:735 (3) - ctrl+j gives better flow, be sure to move the pattern up so it doesnt go off screen i like how it flows now, should be repetitive structure here, so i keep it
00:39:420 (1) - ctrl+h this and then use that for 00:40:106 (2) - they are different on purpose
00:43:192 - should be clickable for proper rhythm, try making 00:42:849 (2) - into two circles instead let it be, sounds nice
01:08:049 - your rhythm skips this sound i know, i can't catch all of them in normal, i should somehow avoid circle"s trains... Miss claps definitely bad idea, so i miss these sounds...
01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - looks cool, but its too much for a normal, in both density and difficulty. i wanna keep it, it fits music cool, it looks cool and it plays fine, i have some test plays about it
01:48:677 (2,3) - use a smoother flow, something like this is better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669739 i wanted somehow emphrase vocal changes (how it can be in normal?), i have tons of patterns on screenshot in kiai

[Hard]

00:33:934 (1) - these sliders skip over the vocal in this section, which i dont really like. you could do circle to 1/2 slider, or just use a 1/2 reverse slider instead.
i don't want to place many did smthing
00:44:906 (1,3) - make parallel? k
00:53:477 (1,2,1,2) - make square Nope
01:04:791 (3,4,5,6) - may look nicer if the heads had the same y value done
01:10:792 (4,6) - are the same slider, but 01:10:106 (2,4) - aren't and it looks weird because of that hmm should be fixed
01:12:849 (2,4,6) - here they're all different, but it would cool if you rotated the slider consistently or something instead of what looks like redrawing the slider randomly each time but they are roteted i don't remember angle but i pretty sure shape is the same
01:42:506 (1) - vocal on tail of this slider, should make it clickable i don't think so hmm, sounds more close to 01:42:849 - imo
01:53:477 (1) - ^vocal isnt as prominent here, but if you change the above change this one too for consistency ^

[Insane]

sightread testplay - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669858 well palyed hope You enjoy

00:43:706 (3) - is a kickslider but 00:44:048 (6) - is not, which makes this inconsistent so let it be
00:46:448 (1) - on this measure, you have the "we" vocal clickable, but on the previous measure it is not (see 00:44:906 (1) - ), this is a bit of cross-measure inconsistency that you should fix it is the point slider in the beginning for playability , other done
00:56:220 (2,3) - here the synth sound gets almost no spacing but then the later ones like 00:57:077 (6) - get a big amount.
01:07:192 (2,3) - ^same here they are sounds different for me like charge effect
01:06:849 (1) - Also for this section NC every measure instead of every two measures imo. Some of these combos are getting pretty long it's kind a wierd looking because of synth based parts...
01:12:334 (1) - for one, I think 01:12:506 - should be clickable to be consistent with earlier in the map where you made the "we" clickable. Also, there's a synth on the blue tick that goes ignored. make sence
01:19:877 (9,11) - could be kicksliders as there are kicks in the music there calm part , keep it
01:42:163 (4,2) - try a smoother overlap https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669846 k

Good luck!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Hello, #modreqs

[- - Normal - -]

1. - Like any other difficulties around, disable Widescreen Support in the settings on this difficulty. Sure
2. 00:39:420 (1,2,1) - The distance spacing here looks pretty different in-between slider (2). There's one at 0.9x approximately, and the other suddenly went into 0.8x which is a bit closer. The density haven't change around here in exception of the downbeats, so it would be best to rebalance the distance spacing here into 0.9x as how you usually do over most parts of the difficulty. Yep, i foget recheck ds when changed 00:38:049 (1,2,3) - pattern
3. 00:44:906 - & 00:54:848 - A small advice, I highly recommend not to create duplicated inherited points like this. There's no change in volume, sampleset, or slider velocity. Just to help you avoid flooding on the timing setup with the same adjustments, I suggest removing them for sure and keep the originals. It applies to other similar segments further from this. should be good now, other diffs too
4. 01:17:820 - Why did you skipped a potential downbeat? It sounds significantly worthy for adding at least just one circle in order to stress an intense beat for a landing. If you're planning for a symmetric pattern here or something, you can possibly make a solid triangle here once you add an additional note here.
   01:17:820 - 1) Sound here have less intence then 01:16:449 (1,2,3,4) - 2) 01:17:820 - 01:20:220 - this section have equal kicks on white ticks so if i map 1st one, player will be confused on 2nd, 3rd etc... i want to make pause here. So, one original thing what i can catch for this moment it's synth sound but it isn't enough loud for emphraise it in normal diff

[- - Hard - -]

1. 00:28:963 (2) - The aesthetics seem solid and fine, but hey. The red nodes in the middle of this slider seems to be holding a good ride on 00:29:477 -, in spite of mainstreaming the vocals "free" with this long slider. So a good solution for this is moving the second red node a little more above, but not too much, will make the positioning of the slider shape a bit more clear to represent the ride... Maybe the downbeat too, but yeah. Let me give you a hand by dropping you a sample for this, if you want it. Yes, i tried to copy it
2. 00:32:563 (1,2,3,4) - Kinda okay when you're intended to increase the spacing overtime here. But why not doing something a little more interesting other than keeping up linear 1/4-repeated sliders? Either making a good curvy pattern, or something that can shape this pattern aesthetically greater. So, it may be that. Line structure here for easy flowing , i wanna place something more easier to catch as it is transition between intro and more activity part. For that reason line structure works well imo. For more intance moments i tried to do more interesting patterns like 00:53:134 (1,1,2,1,2) -
3. 00:36:677 (1) - 00:39:420 (1) - The placements of the red nodes over these two sliders are probably random to follow the buzzing bass on the song track, to me at least. So to keep things in balance for the patterning, maybe try a slider shape that buzzes accurately too. Alike this one parhaps. Just as the song track buzzes the bass and the slider does it too, it's create a good emphasis for sure. Let it be
4. 00:46:448 (1,4,1) - Okay so, these notes seem to overlap pretty awkwardly. Too far due to the approach rate, but visible to see even in gameplay. You may wanna give them a little more space from each other to keep things clear for readability. sure
5. 01:07:363 (2) - The structure here seems a bit too sharp for a turn and it doesn't really get something good out of it. So to improve this even a little bit, try a vertic flipping this slider with Ctrl + J... and make a little blanket if you mind for aesthetics. It would give you the best results in patterning so far. Yes, ctrl-j seems much better
6. - The same thing for the duplicated inherited points issue.

[- - Insane - -]

1. 00:39:420 (1) - Probably an exact copy of the last two wiggled sliders. To differ a little bit of the emphasis, it may look cooler if it were to wiggle the slider straight than curving again. Just so you could keep up the differential structure and make it more interesting to play. Imo it's fine, not worth it, destroying visual circular flow
2. 00:43:706 (3,4) - 00:44:049 (6,7) - 00:44:563 (9) - Ehh, I wonder why have you done a jump on the first two parts mentioned, and not the last one. The song intensity is pretty much similar and the guitar sounds gradually increases it's pitch greatly, so why this isn't implemented for a worthwhile jump? heh, it's a good question... i made a jump
3. 00:48:163 (3,4) - The rhythm here is likely to be undermapped, while the downbeat and vocals on 00:48:334 - lands the beat very dense. Speaking about rhythm composition, maybe you could do some circle + slider + circle in replacement of these two sliders here? It would emphasize the song track much more correctly if done in perspective. If applied, make sure to redo the patterning as well applied
4. 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - 01:08:049 (6,7,8) - Heh, a clear copy-paste from the first part to the second. You know, copy-pasting a single part of a verse shouldn't be a thing if you're gonna get this into a process of ranking. But talking about linear sliders, I probably dislike those kinds of patterns since they don't represent a lot of dropoffs and structures well... if not used correctly of course. But I mean it to say this, I suggest to reconsider mapping this into something else that's more incentive for the efforts in mapping the two parts here. Well, i still learn how to map... and still looking for a line between variability and sequence, places like this(wich sounds the same) make me a bit confuse because when i trying map it in different way it triggers peoples every time
   . And if to be honest i don't get why these sliders represent music badly... oh, for now no changes i guess, I'll think what can i do here...
5. 01:07:706 (4,6) - The two notes suffices the screen display in gameplay and editor mode. Kinda near off-screen, or close to touching the edge of the players' monitor screen but it's bared to look through it. So it's a subjective issue, you can move it a little higher if you think it would be that much of a problem. I don't really mind~ It's up to you. Yeah i can move it up

Well, that should be it! Well-flowed map, keep it up~

Mapper wrote:

why did you completely ignore what i said in the end? at least make a comment on it.

Mapper wrote:

Doesnt look like a lot but there are a lot of problems with this diff. you shouldnt go for rank on this honestly.

Mapper wrote:

id say you should map more, try new stuff and "modding" your own maps and try to find as many problems as possible.

Swiftis wrote:

Great mapset. No problems as far as I can tell. Good luck on getting ranked! ^^

1. "(feat. UK:ID)" is generally attached to the artist, not the title, switch that around
2. totally optional but you can add the tags monstercat ukf if you want

1. CS3.4 is more logical because it makes the sliders not overlap each other as much
2. 00:11:991 (1) - imo, this is overmapping for an easy, and you missed the essential beat 00:12:506 - here in doing it
   consider instead mapping this rhythm:
   
   SPOILER

   
   of course if you do this (recommended), then also consider doing it for the repeating rhythms 00:14:734 - / 00:17:477 - / etc.
3. 00:25:363 (1) - this rhythm is bad because you missed emphasizing the strong downbeat 00:25:706 - here
   change 00:25:363 (1) - this to 2 circles and make the circle 00:25:706 - here the NC
4. 00:25:363 (1,2) - the flow here is bad because of the direction that the player has to shift here so quickly
   the movements are generally not as smooth as they should be here
   
   SPOILER

   • https://puu.sh/v3O9f/9636dd9cd2.jpg
5. 00:44:906 - similar error to 00:25:363 (1) - here, you need to emphasize this strong downbeat by making it a clickable note and an NC since this is the strongest beat around here
   the rhythm needs to be changed to this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:48:849 (3) - this is an offbeat that an easy player would have trouble hitting, consider learning more about polarity in a tutorial https://youtu.be/53PkFLrK8Ws
   and I'm noticing this a lot in the rest of your easy, please fix it ;;

1. 00:15:077 (2) - the flow is much more linear at x256 y236
2. 00:35:477 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better
3. 00:40:963 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better
4. 01:08:221 (4) - flows better at x20 y156
5. 01:48:677 (2,3) - thats too much overlap its hard to read

Jonawaga wrote:

hai from mod queue Hello
little help post here
[general]

1. "(feat. UK:ID)" is generally attached to the artist, not the title, switch that around that's how it wrote in EP track list
2. totally optional but you can add the tags monstercat ukf if you want sure

[easy]

1. CS3.4 is more logical because it makes the sliders not overlap each other as much they don't overlap at all orz
2. 00:11:991 (1) - imo, this is overmapping for an easy, and you missed the essential beat 00:12:506 - here in doing it
   consider instead mapping this rhythm:
   
   SPOILER

   
   of course if you do this (recommended), then also consider doing it for the repeating rhythms 00:14:734 - / 00:17:477 - / etc. 00:13:020 - beat more important then 00:12:506 - and i tried to cath every sounds on white ticks
3. 00:25:363 (1) - this rhythm is bad because you missed emphasizing the strong downbeat 00:25:706 - here
   change 00:25:363 (1) - this to 2 circles and make the circle 00:25:706 - here the NC following for vocals is more intuitive here imo
4. 00:25:363 (1,2) - the flow here is bad because of the direction that the player has to shift here so quickly
   the movements are generally not as smooth as they should be here i made in softer
   
   SPOILER

   • https://puu.sh/v3O9f/9636dd9cd2.jpg
5. 00:44:906 - similar error to 00:25:363 (1) - here, you need to emphasize this strong downbeat by making it a clickable note and an NC since this is the strongest beat around here i agree
   the rhythm needs to be changed to this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:48:849 (3) - this is an offbeat that an easy player would have trouble hitting, consider learning more about polarity in a tutorial https://youtu.be/53PkFLrK8Ws
   and I'm noticing this a lot in the rest of your easy, please fix it ;; i saw this video already i think... it's kind a subjective opinion... i give a bit more space for reaction for each section where i swap to red tick (2beats and 1,5 beats), and i give player 1,5-beat space to catch that swap, and then use same rhytm pauses for same swaps For now no changes, let's see, if someone else point it out

[normal]

1. 00:15:077 (2) - the flow is much more linear at x256 y236 mmm ???
2. 00:35:477 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better fine let it be
3. 00:40:963 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better ^
4. 01:08:221 (4) - flows better at x20 y156 okay
5. 01:48:677 (2,3) - thats too much overlap its hard to read Not too much imo

hopefully thats enough to be helpful, best of luck~

direday wrote:

Hello! From my Queue. M4M

General

1. Сделай теги одинаковыми во всех дифах, как в инсэйне:
   Insane: DnB drum and bass electronica F Minor Factory EP monstercat UKF Вроде пофиксил тэги
2. Необязательно, но полезно: найди BG 1920х1080px. 2017 год на дворе, все как минимум такое разрешение имеют. Оригинал этого в HD формате, больше нету, я просто цветовую гамму поменял немного. А скалить в FullHD на пофиг качества все равно не даст.., если есть идеи на БГ можешь кинуть Orz

Insane

• 
  Не слушай Маппера. Вполне себе диффа. Тот же Фантир не намного дальше ушел. Ну у него свое мнение, у меня свое. Все нормально

1. 00:14:563 (4) - тут есть и хайхэт и "for" в тесте. Яб просто влепил круг между 00:14:049 (3,1) - Я накинул 1/2 ритмов
2. 00:17:306 (6) - тут есть довольно четкий звук, который резко обрывается. Тоже стоит замапить. Давай я сделаю еще одну диффу и буду исправлять на ней, потом скину, а то мне придется скриншотить каждый пункт, а мне лень. Вот диффа, кинь в папку с мэпсетом. Постараюсь объяснить тут все изменения.
3. 00:17:820 (2,3) - эти два слайдера представляют точно такие же звуки как и 00:15:077 (2,3) - эти и должны быть замапленны соответственно. Ты выбрал 1.4 ds , я сохранил это. Ну так вроде ритм одинаковы и был, вообщем хз...
4. 00:20:049 (6) - во первых тут есть текст "else", а во вторых, если добавлять круги там ^ , то по ритму нужно и здесь. k
5. 00:21:249 (3) - я понимаю, ты пытаешься сохранить ритм, но там в музыке вообще нет звуков кроме хайхэта на большом белом тике. Если поменять на круг, то получится хорошо - кликать нужно только на звуке, который есть в музыке и перед и после круга одинаковая пауза, что позволяет сохранить ритм. k
6. 00:22:277 (4,5) - в целом это достаточно плохая идея мапить вокал без в местах, где нет четких других звуков, потому, что вокалист не машина и идеально точно под метроном попасть не может. А если заменить это на слайдер, то все норм - слайдер щадящий в плане точности. k
7. 00:22:963 (1,2,3,1) - ты не особо использовал линейный флоу до этого - почти везде у тебя были острые углы между объектами. Нет смысла ни с того ни с сего начинать тут. Плюс 00:23:649 (2,1) - плохой бланкет, некрасиво. k
8. 00:23:992 (3) - В идеале, каждый сильный звук должен быть кликабелен (а не концом слайдера - это не клик). Сделал более-менее k
9. 00:24:334 (4,1,2,3,4) - NC не всегда обязательно должно быть на большом белом тике. Тут это сильно портит читаемость. NC по названию даже говорит что это новое комбо, а не новый бит, потому лучше использовать его для группировки нескольких объектов, которые игроком воспринимаются как одна цепочка. Надеюсь я нормально выразился. k
10. 00:26:049 (1,2,3) - немного двинул, для красоты. Далее, если я не объяснил что-то, то это для красоты просто. k
11. 00:26:906 (4) - тут не зачем быть вообще какому-либо объекту Он чтобы не было дыры в ритме где вокал начинается на синей тике
12. 00:28:620 (2) - этой тычке не зачем иметь такой спейсинг. Она совсем не интенсивная в музыке. Я переделал
13. 00:28:963 (3) - А это наоборот стоит выделить спейсингом, потому что там сильная нота. Честно говоря - стрёмный слайдер. :sadFace:
14. 00:31:192 (1,2,3) - весьма интенсивный кусок. Стоит как то это выделить. Например спейсингом. k
    Дальше карта становится занчительно лучше, проблемы в основном только с выделением более громких/интенсивных частей музыки из обычных. В моей диффе на этом я закончил, далее просто объясню.
15. 00:42:163 (1) - начиная от сюда и до 00:55:534 (6) - идет разгон. Интесивность музыки постоянно увеличивается. В карте должно примерно тоже самое происходить. Можешь просто постепенно увеличивать спейсинг между объектами, а можешь SV менять, но как то это нужно отразить. Ну про интенсивность музыки ты загнул по-моему, не думаю что я сейчас хочу тут что-то менять...
16. 00:58:277 (10,1) - плохо выглядит. Может их просто стакнуть? не работают такие стаки в этом флоу
17. 01:06:163 (9) - Чот трипла загнулась, остальные прямые. Там бланкет, который съехал чутка, этот трипл по другому звучит, вот я форму и поменял...
18. 01:25:020 (2,3,4,5) - не очень визуально. Лучше чтоб они либо ровную дугу составляли, либо наоборот - более "не в линию" были. отодвинул
19. 01:42:677 (2) - на 188:316 двинь, а то как то не очень. И 01:43:877 (1) - туда же тогда к
20. 01:58:620 (5,1,2) - несимметрично чутка ммм так и задумано
    Ну в целом всё. Чуть подполировать и вполне ранкабельная карта будет!
    
    Да и это ^ в основном мои предложения, есть миллионы способов замапить по-другому. Но там, где я говорил про круги добавить, их реально надо добавить.

Остальные диффы проблем не имеют, может чуть чуть визуальную часть отполировать, хотя там и так хорошо. Видно, что не просто делал легкие диффы для галочки. Это сейчас редкость.

CircleFairy wrote:

Hi I came from #modreqs :3 Hello O/

Insane
00:22:277 (4) - This small part can fit better with the song, like having that slider a reverse slider followed by a note on the red tick (see picture). Actually why not? xD

This was really all I could find out of all the difficulties, nice map set, good luck! :-)

Lami wrote:

Hello there, I come here for m4m. hey

• [General]
  
  Overally volume is too loud.(especially, it doesn't make sense which used 100% volume in non-kiai section.)
  Recommend to adjust volume about reducing 10%~30%. my hs a bit lower volume and music abit higher than normal... but i guess i can lower it abit
  
  [Insane]
  
  AR 9.2 is too high, at this diffculty. I highly recommend to use AR 9. i want to get a good reason for it

1. 00:13:706 (2,3) - Might be minor issue, but they can be more polished. Yea, it just blanket off-ed.
   It looks unstable about visually. You can compare with 00:16:449 (4,5) - . k
2. 00:21:592 (3,4) - First, at 00:20:563 (2,3) - stacking isn't good idea, since music still continues instrument after vocals.
   At continous instrument, Stacking may occured killing movement(flow), and it give opposite feedback to players. Therefore, i would like to recommend to replace 00:21:592 (3) - . And about 00:22:277 (4) - , you may want to follow vocal in here.....? if it's right, this rhythm usage doesn't make sense about skipping another vocal 'te' 00:22:792 - . changed i guess
3. 00:23:649 (2,3) - would be better, if you try something here. as starting pitchy beat at here (00:23:992 - ) i don't get it, if metion high sound here, so i don't want to highlight it because it's vocal follow section, i guess make it clicable enough here
4. 00:33:934 (1) - This slider shape looks so messy, even if you try something for expressing special sound.
   Because overall shape looks like randomly twisted rope, player may feel meh from this visual.
   I wish you can try more regular neat shape, like https://puu.sh/v9RWh.png fine
5. 00:36:677 (1,2) - pretty improvable blanket. you can judge this whether it is wrong or not, from approach circle https://puu.sh/v9S4s.png k
6. 00:39:934 (2,3) - same above blanket issue k
7. 00:44:906 (1,2,4) - This overlapped partten isn't neat, imo. Unregular overlapping looks so weird on visual. i fix it
8. 00:46:105 (6) - This down-beat slider feel so awkward. Because there is no motivation(vocal, instrument, etc..) for choose down-beat rhythm. You need to consdier to swap(ctrl+G) this rhythm 00:45:934 (5,6) - . what? there is strong sound
9. 00:48:334 (4,5,6) - same ^. ^
10. 00:51:420 (5,6) - same ^ . ^
11. 00:46:276 (6,1) - I don't think that this jump was placed suitable. Because this jump is just unique partten at this whole section (00:44:906 - ~ 00:55:877 - ) Adittionally, you should be reconsider to flow, too. i don't follow drums... 00:46:105 (6,1,6,1,6,1) - strong synth sounds what i highlight there
12. 00:44:906 - ~ 00:55:877 - Overally, almost of note just repeating similar partten with same DS.
    Consistent is good for logic of mapping, but it's too much, imo. A lot of people are saying me to be more consistent... even with this kind of patterns... overall i guess i have now smthing between consistent and original
    I think that It feels so bored for playing. If you have time, I would like to recommend to remapping this section. That what i don't want to do
13. 00:59:820 (4) - What is the basis of this acceleration? This sound follow pretty similar sound 01:00:163 (5) - without acceleration. 00:59:134 (2,3,4,5) - 1st slider have very big intense, 2nd - low intense, 3rd - big but less then 1st, and 4th equal to 2nd. Thats how i heard it
14. 01:02:392 (7) - Slider's end point are snapped on 3/8 beat.? Well, i think you should be mapped 01:02:563 - , 01:02:649 - instead of uncommon rhythm. Because of 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , they already mapped snare sound. then, why don't you follow 01:02:563 - , 01:02:649 - , too? I simply fogot recheck snaping after fixing blanket
15. 01:03:077 (2,3,4,5,6) - i suppose that you can make more natural circling flow, if you adjust note that 01:03:420 (6) - 's end point move right a little. let it be
16. 01:05:306 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Nazi staff, They don't have consistent shape with each other. It's noticable different for player.(include for me. xd) k
17. 01:05:306 (1,3) - Swap NC?? Regular NC cycle is just white rhythm line tho.. i swap to another instrument here, and it's reads easier imo
18. 01:06:334 (10,11,12) - According to music, I suggest that you can consider to mapping two stressed beat.
    1) 01:06:420 - This blue tick sound have pretty stronger than 01:06:334 (10) - are You seriously?
    2) 01:06:592 - Really similar sound with 01:06:763 (13) - , which you already make clickable beat. it's sounds more like echo , there 2 strongs sounds and i guess i snap it correctly
19. 01:10:106 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - About visually, I don't think that they really need overlapped partten in here.
    If they have some purpose from overlapped, then okay. But there is not something, imo. Noone like it Fine for me imo
20. 01:12:849 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - Overlapped partten sometimes make weird about visual, if they don't have special purpose(mapper's intention). I think they can be better than looking, if you don't use overlapping here. also, 01:13:878 (8,10) - is more weird, as ambiguous overlapping, than others. i like overlaps here, i can make it more neat but not too much so...
21. 01:15:077 (1,2) - Consider buff DS here, as 01:15:420 (2) - have strong beat, and you already follow this policy at many point..
    I think changing DS is more good, since 01:15:077 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - have too consistent DS. feel kinda strict k
22. 01:15:591 (3) - This down-beat slider don't have big problem. But, since 01:15:763 - have more strong beat, it will required clickable here, than making clickable 01:15:592 - ... lets i lie that i follow vocal here... lol... it plays fine so
23. 01:19:534 (6) - Already, you keep some consistent shape at 01:17:820 (1,2,3,4,5) - , but (6) placed only off-shape with (1,2,3,4,5). Since they don't have big changing music, I think you should be better to keeping consistent place. (x60, y48 is right place) all this pattern this pattern a bit clock turned if You don't metion
24. 01:21:163 (3) - Since 01:21:249 (4) - start new sound here, you may better to put click something here, than current. some example, https://puu.sh/va1bC.png or https://puu.sh/va1ca.png So i have some stuff here, 1st - kick shuld be clicable as strongest beat here, 2nd - 01:22:534 (3,4,5) - i used for variativity with section, 3rd - it's unusuall pattern for insane let it be easier to catch as 1st in section , and 4th - it's a kind a funny to have 1 thing for word "kick" before kick in music...
    
25. 01:20:905 (2,3,4) - , 01:23:649 (2,3,4) - They have same rhythm usage, but they have tiny different DS. Every note don't have to place same DS, But tiny different DS don't make any effect for playing. Make consistent DS, then looks good. okay
26. 01:28:192 (6) - Im not sure abut this, just my opinion. Even number stream notes feel awkward for playing. Since 01:28:192 (6) - don't have pitch sound, you can consider to remove this, then it will give more clean feedback to player. hmm, i feel like it really easier to catch for player... hmm let's try to do another variation, i guess
27. 01:34:791 (3) - Just personal opinion, this slider curved too much. I think straight slider is better in this case. i like how it is
28. 01:38:391 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - They didn't polished about DS. Just example 01:38:391 (1,2) - ,is bigger DS than 01:38:477 (2,3) - . but the other way, 01:38:820 (2,3) - is bigger DS than 01:38:734 (1,2) - . I don't think they have some logic for that. You may should be check DS here. k
29. 01:49:363 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - it just personally, if you make more curved stream in here, it's more good flow, I think. Because this curvature only smaller than your style.(i intend more curved stream.) Nothing wrong here, just your choice whether you change or not. so i keep, at least for now
30. 01:55:877 (6,1) - Just nazi blanket, you can check this by approach circle. k
31. 02:01:706 (1) - Maybe you intend to place in center on the screen, but this place kinda weird by this 02:00:505 (3,3,3,3) - square. if you place this note on 02:00:505 (3,3,3,3) - square's center, it looks more neat. let it be, and it's not square btw

I hope this modding help your map. Sure it does
Good luck your further process of mapping.

Smewo wrote:

INSANE
тут если на определенных местах заострять внимание вечность уйдет, просто скажу.
Правь ритм в определенных местах 00:55:192 (5,6) - тут например А что тут? сначала инерция затем лазер, вроде нормально , 01:02:392 (7,1) - поправил снайпинг или тут, 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5) - тут четкая 1\2 хз зачем стрим стрим чтобы следовать за вокалом при интесивной предыдущей секции

Еще проблема в выделении нот спейсингом у которых звук сильнее, у тебя идет все под ряд, что ни есть хорошо 01:39:420 (4) - вот например круг, поставь его в конец слайдера и слайдер {ctrl + G} так будет лучше например Имо fine

Если затрагивать тему ненужных оверлапов, никакой жизни не хватит все написать ( утрирую офк я просто жопа ленинвая лол )

Сам попробуй посмотреть на карту, логически, подумать почему эта нота стоит тут а не тут, почему тут такой спейсинг, ну ты понял надеюсь

P.S. Песня просто отличная, удачи с мапой <3

Smokeman wrote:

NM from q Hello O/ some late feedback

EDIT: INSANE

00:11:992 (1,2) - Emphasising the Melody rather than the wierd hi-hat at 00:12:677 - sounds like a better idea to tbh. 00:12:506 - The second note plays here so you would only need to shorten 00:11:992 (1) - and move 00:12:677 (2) - accordingly. Or you could try this rythm instead https://puu.sh/vczTR/ffcd1d057d.png k
00:22:963 (1,2) - these play kinda awkward if you ask me, the break in the flow doesnt really add to anything in the song either. https://puu.sh/vcAeb/59e2f9a822.png Not a big deal
00:24:334 (4) - i dont think this slider art thingy adds to anything either. imo just a regular curved one would be just fine (keeping visual consitency) https://puu.sh/vcAmu/f6f96ac109.png (liek this 00:27:077 (1) - somehow) It looks fine and it's just 2 times curved slider nothing uncommon with map's visual consitency
00:31:877 (2) - this is pedantic but trust me, the curve on this one is kinda buged. Try removing the second white square and putting it back, you should be able to see the difference then. okay
00:33:249 (6,7,8,9) - putting 1/4 slider would allow you to create some nice feedback clicking 00:33:592 (1) - cuz there is this buildup drum sound on 00:33:420 - https://puu.sh/vcBoH/861233de4a.png 00:33:420 (8,9) - i don't want to make 2 equal beat as slider and this alone 1/4 slider will be bad decision
00:36:677 (1) - the slider end looks kinda off.. what happened xD https://puu.sh/vcBrV/bcc14fb04d.png i have no idea lol
00:42:848 (5,6) - you can make the transition between those two a bit more dramatic by moving 00:43:191 (6) - to the left Nope thx
00:44:220 (7,8,9) - not really a big fan of how this 90° angle feels. (also NC smth here its quite a long combo) it's not a 90 , it's around 70, plays fine... added NC
00:45:763 - the rythms after this point felt rather unintuitive to play. I think you tried to follow both thte drums and the vocals with each respective 1/2 snapping. huh
00:56:220 (2,3,4,5,1) - the visual flow might look good but the emphasis is all over the place. ?
00:57:077 (6) - NC here (same for the similar patterns following) let it be
00:59:134 (2,3,4,5) - all the important sounds are on the tails : < try a rythm like this https://puu.sh/vcDf1/6a72a69f4a.png Alseo there is no visual clue that 00:59:134 (2) - is sped up, it looked more like a 3/4 slider which was quite confusing to play i have no idea how to do it more readble And it's not drum follow section
01:22:534 (3,4,5,6) - try having more dramatic angle changes. What i mean by this: now https://puu.sh/vcEgj/461411358b.png a bit more dramatic https://puu.sh/vcEtM/cfe2c7c198.png up-down movement baisicly lol but i don;t want to
01:29:820 (5) - also mute all those 3/4 slider ends (picked it up just now prolly did this earlier in the map, dunno) k
01:51:077 (2,3,4,5,6) - 01:52:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 01:53:477 (1,2,3,4,5) - 01:56:220 (1,2,3,4,5) - i think you could try to have circular the other way around aswell from time to time xD but it's cool

this map is untitidy at some point e.g. 01:12:677 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - but i dont want to point out all of them. You can look at it yourself and find out which patterns might need to be cleaned up a little bit :^) When i try to do it:"My map sucks all it long, maybe i should remap it?" Then paly it and: "That's not too bad hmmm..." Zzzz

Didnt look at other diffs cuz lazy :^)

modded cuz mumei in BG That's how it works

baaai

Kaifin wrote:

holy you have a lot more pages of mods then i thought you would HELLO THERE
hi

Easy

1. 00:25:363 (1,2,3) - giving these notes a bit more horizontal spacing would be helpful for the new player, as they usually follow sliders to the very end and thus the flow might be a tiny bit uncomfortable for them, either way the distance between 00:25:363 (1,2) - and 00:26:049 (2,3) - is not even, so this is a good time to fix that too, something like this is what i mean (with even spacing) k
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:31:877 (2,1) - fix your DS, i assume this was a mistake k
3. 01:07:363 (2,3,4) - this is another place where i could see the flow being quite uncomfortable for a new player, this cursor movement + cramped reading will prove difficult for an Easy level player, there are weakness in being TOO tightly structured in Easy diffs, this applies to the other one that appears a couple seconds later honestly it's sounds like just remap it because i don't like flow, without any pointing about right flow :-/ Anyway i made 2nd part easier 01:11:477 (4,1,2) - 01:07:363 (2,3,4) - there no changes because actually it is oval flow without rverse variation, i guess it's not too hard to do And about reading 01:06:849 (1,4) - only there i saw a bit issue but because 4 comes when 1 already readed it's also fine... My Easy was maded with simply visual idea, when 1/1 gaps placed nearly (close to touching) and placed 2/1 with noticable space. I find it a good idea, so when player see no space he should always expect only 1/1, that's why i used so many blankets/nearly placed objects in this diff, this patterns were done on 1st stage of mapping when i choosed SV/AR for diff. It was like map's consept for Easy... Maybe i didn't realise it perfect but yeah...
   
4. 01:15:763 (2,1) - giving this the same angle as the angle between 01:15:077 (1,2) - would give better flow + consistency structure wise should be good now
5. 01:20:563 - to 01:33:934 - this is REALLY good Easy patterning, good job hmmm?? it's a bit boring but yeahh....
6. 01:34:963 (2,1) - this movement could prove incredibly confusing to a new player, because 01:35:649 (1,2) - are both on the screen for a considerable amount of time before 01:35:649 (1) - is clicked, i would just make this pattern 01:34:277 (1,2,1,2) - a square to be honest I tried to explain why i think it's not too hard before...
7. 01:49:363 (3,4) - another opportunity to improve your structure by using the same angle as 01:48:677 (2,3) - i'm pointing this stuff out because based on your mapping you'll really really like this k
   
   nice Easy! i like it, very well handled lower diff Somehow i up diff by 0.01 and now have N icon Nvm we are still good

Normal

1. 00:29:134 (2,3,1) - uneven line fixed
2. 01:08:733 (6) - objects end is not snapped! yap
3. 01:13:021 (2,3) - blanket
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:24:335 (4,5,6) - i know you're running out of room, but this looks mega cramped in comparison to 01:21:592 (4,5,6) - It's like inside-outside tringles , what's wrong?, i even tried to do same angles on them, if i remember correctly
5. 01:42:163 (3) - DS this as 1.0x sure
6. 01:48:677 (2,3) - i know its the same rhythm repeated a whole bunch, but i think this specific patterning would be very confusing for Normal player Everyone pointing it, and i still don't want to change it, it's like same overlap for 1/2 but in the middle instead of tail...

Hard

1. 00:22:963 (1,2,3) - uneven triangle but the one on the other side isn't uneven so its like ???? so? it's different pattern
2. 00:28:449 (1,2) - blanket
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:32:563 (1,2,3,4) - are these supposed to be slowly expanding in spacing? it just kind of looks like the last one is off, you'd have to either space them more which i wouldn't recommend, or give them all the same spacing (which i would recommend) OR alternatively pattern them differently so the expansion in spacing is more noticeable yes it's. I like it
4. 00:42:677 (2,3) - bbbblanket
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:00:334 (5,6) - blanket
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:01:534 (2,3,4) - not a straight line but also not a discernible shape, plz make it one of these two k
7. 01:05:820 (6,7) - bbbbbbblanket
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:06:849 (1,2) - bbbbblanket
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:45:934 (3,1) - might have not been your intention but its close enough to be worth pointing out as fuckd
   SPOILER

   
   blankets should be better , but not last one, its too much...

Hard

Its Insane i guess?

1. AR 9.2 but OD 7 4.54 stars? this should be AR 9 at most if not a little lower lets' do 9, but lower than 9 with 1/4 jumps is wierd
2. 00:19:535 (5,6,1) - uneven spacing compared to the last two that were even spacing so pointing out wat??? its almost all intro in 1.4.... pettern wich You mention is consistant....
3. 00:22:277 (4,5,1) - uneven triangle mmm
4. 01:13:535 (7) - NC for consistency with earlier it's looks better as on part imo, pattering based NC
5. 01:20:905 (2,3) - this 1/4 spacing is the exact same as your 1/2 spacing, which will cause this to be very very very easily misread, same with the next time it happens 2 seconds from now 01:26:563 (3) - i buffed ds here to 1.4 other places looks fine for me

your insane gets a bit more cluttered than everything else but this whole set has this really nice 2011 - 2012 vibe to it (in a good way) Really? give You extra kudos for general opinion Kappa

good luck! Thank You!