JoaoGMR wrote:

#modreq

Sorry i have bad English.. Translate help me

Just play!

First offset "wrong" it's 11991
00:11:992 (1,2) - i think. and test, can have 1 more slider like This i keep this section, i want save 2 this souds without weaks beats
00:26:734 (4,1) - 4: slider 1 "delete" (like This) 00:27:077 - this beat seems important for me
00:28:105 (3) - 1 circle In the previous red (like This) mmm, ye , why not, it fits well
00:35:305 (1,2,3) - i don't know. 1 in the red (start) and delete 2? (this) But I liked how it was before No, thx
00:43:533 (1) - I do not know how to explain it, but I thought it was better this way But if you did not like it well. It's cool the same Your variation is stoping flow, in this section i wanted to make cool smooth flow.
01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - can have triples? or. slider round trip (I do not know what the name, i'm sorry) i have triples here 01:38:391 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - and here 02:00:334 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - , so for more variety, I prefer something else

And.. it's all.. i can modded easy and normal (because.. i'm only mapped extra+) Thanks with you like it

1. Судя по критериям ранкинга, кастомной диффа может зваться только одна (в аппруве понятно, в мапсете самая высокая), только если это не какие-то тематические названия из игры какой-нибудь (гитар хиро, лига легенд, ещё какая-то музыкальная игра название которой я не помню, которая с адванседами хайперами и т.д.). Эта песня же не этот случай
2. Добавь в тэги "drum and bass electronica F Minor Factory EP" (последнее это название альбома (или EP, без разницы))

1. вот так будет круче по ритму
2. 00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - почему бы здесь не поставить ноты чтобы выделить вокал? всё-таки это инсейн и думаю лишним не будет
3. 00:26:220 - ^
4. 00:29:477 - тут такой сильный бит, а ты его пропустил...странно
5. 00:33:849 - мб ноту? раз уж так близко поставил слайдер
6. 00:43:706 (3) - сделай репит (до 00:43:877 - , не дальше)
7. 00:48:163 (3) - 00:50:906 (3) - слайдеры заканчиваются на сильную долю (вокал, сильный бит, всё такое), что не есть хорошо. Сделай эту долю кликабельной
8. 00:55:534 - тут прям звук такой выделяющийся, хочется выделить его двумя кикслайдерами
9. 00:57:077 (6) - нк
10. 00:59:820 (5) - ^
11. 01:02:734 (8) - ^
12. 01:08:049 (6) - ^
13. 01:10:792 (5,1) - поменяй местами нк
14. 01:13:535 (6) - нк
15. 01:13:535 (6,9) - вполне сильные биты здесь и такой маленький спейсинг
16. 01:30:763 - 01:31:105 (5) - чёто вообще по ритму не сочетается с 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5) - , лучше убери 01:31:106 (5) - и поставь ноту на 01:30:763 -
17. 01:33:591 (1) - ненужный нк
18. 01:34:791 (3) - 01:36:163 (3) - 01:37:534 (3) - какие-то некрасивые слайдеры
19. 01:46:277 (5,1) - фиксани бланкет, слайдер правее
20. 01:46:449 (6,4) - стакни
21. 01:58:791 (2,3) - очень близко
22. 02:01:706 - мб выделить звук нотой а потом уже спиннер?

1. 00:24:334 (3) - убери какую-нибудь из точек на последнем завороте слайдера, а то не слишком красивым слайдер получается
2. 01:07:706 (3,4) - игрок ориентирующийся на хардики (без дт) скорее всего не прочитает это, так что ctrl+g
3. 01:11:992 (2) - 01:12:849 (1) - не оч выглядит, лучше стакни конец слайдера и ноту
4. 01:27:420 - не очень нравится что ты здесь сильный вокал пропустил. Я конечно понял твою идею с тем чтобы игрок немного отдохнул, но не здесь
5. 01:28:106 (3,1) - фикс бланкет
6. 01:31:364 (5) - про подобное я тебе уже говорил в ласт диффе, на самом деле, опишу кратко - сделай конец слайдера кликабельным
7. 01:44:391 (2,1) - стакни

Danii wrote:

Привет, нм с очереди СНГ мапперов Привет O/

[General]

1. Судя по критериям ранкинга, кастомной диффа может зваться только одна (в аппруве понятно, в мапсете самая высокая), только если это не какие-то тематические названия из игры какой-нибудь (гитар хиро, лига легенд, ещё какая-то музыкальная игра название которой я не помню, которая с адванседами хайперами и т.д.). Эта песня же не этот случай Там написано, что названия должны отражать сложность, когда меня убедят, что мои не подходят, тогда поменяю.
2. Добавь в тэги "drum and bass electronica F Minor Factory EP" (последнее это название альбома (или EP, без разницы)) кк

[Pls enjoy game Just Play!]

1. вот так будет круче по ритму по моему разница не велика
2. 00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - почему бы здесь не поставить ноты чтобы выделить вокал? всё-таки это инсейн и думаю лишним не будет
3. 00:26:220 - ^ Я не хочу, чтобы ритм вышел слишком рандомный, в начале если за мапать весь вокал, будет очень сложно ориентироватться имхо
4. 00:29:477 - тут такой сильный бит, а ты его пропустил...странно Вокал мне кажется важнее
5. 00:33:849 - мб ноту? раз уж так близко поставил слайдер лучше спейсану
6. 00:43:706 (3) - сделай репит (до 00:43:877 - , не дальше) Не хочу тормозить флоу
7. 00:48:163 (3) - 00:50:906 (3) - слайдеры заканчиваются на сильную долю (вокал, сильный бит, всё такое), что не есть хорошо. Сделай эту долю кликабельной надо больше мнений, я хучу здесь оставить так
8. 00:55:534 - тут прям звук такой выделяющийся, хочется выделить его двумя кикслайдерами 00:53:134 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - никто не видит пулемет
9. 00:57:077 (6) - нк все 4 "бэк" звука в оду секцию
10. 00:59:820 (5) - ^ ^
11. 01:02:734 (8) - ^ да
12. 01:08:049 (6) - ^ тоже самое
13. 01:10:792 (5,1) - поменяй местами нк нет, с 1 наоборот снял xD
14. 01:13:535 (6) - нк и нет
15. 01:13:535 (6,9) - вполне сильные биты здесь и такой маленький спейсинг такой же как в предыдущей секции
16. 01:30:763 - 01:31:105 (5) - чёто вообще по ритму не сочетается с 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5) - , лучше убери 01:31:106 (5) - и поставь ноту на 01:30:763 - там вокала нет... все 1/4 тут только под вокал
17. 01:33:591 (1) - ненужный нк согласен
18. 01:34:791 (3) - 01:36:163 (3) - 01:37:534 (3) - какие-то некрасивые слайдеры почему?
19. 01:46:277 (5,1) - фиксани бланкет, слайдер правее к
20. 01:46:449 (6,4) - стакни ладно
21. 01:58:791 (2,3) - очень близко к
22. 02:01:706 - мб выделить звук нотой а потом уже спиннер? да

[Not so easy]

1. 00:24:334 (3) - убери какую-нибудь из точек на последнем завороте слайдера, а то не слишком красивым слайдер получается убрал
2. 01:07:706 (3,4) - игрок ориентирующийся на хардики (без дт) скорее всего не прочитает это, так что ctrl+g ладно
3. 01:11:992 (2) - 01:12:849 (1) - не оч выглядит, лучше стакни конец слайдера и ноту нормально выглядит
4. 01:27:420 - не очень нравится что ты здесь сильный вокал пропустил. Я конечно понял твою идею с тем чтобы игрок немного отдохнул, но не здесь Ну а где? предыдущая секция построенна точно также, если ломать, то ломать и там тоже по структурному принципу, я пока хз вообщем. Читается это нормально, пока оставлю...
5. 01:28:106 (3,1) - фикс бланкет к
6. 01:31:364 (5) - про подобное я тебе уже говорил в ласт диффе, на самом деле, опишу кратко - сделай конец слайдера кликабельным 01:28:792 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1) - вся секция как тут так и в инсейне тут по вокалу. А акценты в вокальном плане расставлены на 01:30:334 - 01:30:849 - 01:31:363 - 01:31:877 - и т.п., поэтому они кликабельны
7. 01:44:391 (2,1) - стакни так вроде и так стакнуто

Kyomaku wrote:

Hi. From #Modreqs, although I'm a little inexperienced, so let's see if this can be of help to you. Feel free to skip.

[General]
I find the beatmap names to be a little confusing. Not sure if these are supposed to be Easy, Normal, Hard or Normal, Hard, Insane. Maybe consider renaming the difficulties?

[Just play!]
Map seems good on a first impression. I choked tho. Let's see what I can find. Looked pretty overall.

00:22:277 (1,2,1) - Sounds a bit off to me. First 2 circles are mapped to the vocals, then the slider ignores the vocals. Song has a tough rhythm. Consider extending the slider a bit? Making it start 2 ticks earlier (on the red tick). Like this. Give it a try, maybe you'll like it. i agree, but want to keep down beat clicable, so added circle on red tick.
00:26:220 - You could add a circle here, vocals allow it (like the 3 circles you placed prior to this part). You could also add the circle and make the one after it a slider, like this. Both really optional though, but it sounds good to me. done

[Not so easy]
Good map, everything had a good flow.

Tags are off/missing in this difficulty, though. fixed

Well that's as much as I found! I'm not really good at easier difficulties, due to them ignoring the rhythm of the song most of the time, so I don't think I can help with those. Good luck! Maybe you'll want to add another difficulty, though. Maybe

Left wrote:

ehh.. is this finished map..? maybe no normal diff now?

(if ok i'll mod as it is now)

Left wrote:

came back

[General]
change mp3 to 192kbps now unrankable later

[Easy]
00:11:991 (1) - rather than just 2/1, how about 3/2 reverse + 2/1 slider? drum isn't loud here and 00:12:506 - 00:13:020 - has strong sound
00:14:734 (1) - same
00:17:477 (1) - ^ sounds cool
00:35:306 (1) - NC isn't necessary in easy right
00:38:049 (1) - ^ ^
00:36:677 (1) - just 2/1 is better cuz sound in 00:37:363 - is bigger and better to read than now.
00:38:049 (1,1,1) - ^ i did smthing but don't know what exactly xD should be more 2/1 slider parts
00:42:163 (1,2,3) - DS0.96 and overlap need improvement fixed
00:53:134 (1) - slider isn't nice and slightly touching 00:56:392 (2) - not touching anymore
01:01:363 (5,1,2) - too many circles in easy, you can use 1/1 instead. let it be
01:14:391 (4,1) - DS yep
01:16:449 (3,4,5,6) - too hard
01:34:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - this song has more than just 2/1 circle yep but i make contrast between fast and slow vocal parts
02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - too hard
Fine i changed places which uses more than 2 circles in a row. Decreases SR by 0.06, hmm. I have no idea why easy players can't clic 4 circle in row but fine. Now we have E icon on E.

[Normal]
00:33:934 (1,2) - blanket fixed i guess
00:58:106 (3,4) - too circle is hard for nubs. can use 1/2 slider
01:03:420 (4,5,6) - same, use 1/2 + circle pls
It appears again and again
So i can't use it in normal too? No way.
01:40:277 (2,3,4) - flow is super hard, just https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7282070 is better yep
01:46:963 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - note train is too long, 01:49:020 (4) - can change this to 1 circle to give a break for nubs i make a bit pause

I made some flow changes, should be easier now.


[Hard]
00:32:563 (1,2,3,4) - too overlapped each other, can avoid it easily. Yep but it flows easily, that was the reason
00:33:934 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - I think u have intention in each slider, but it just looks dirty when it came togeter. no logic in overall pattern, just blanket there. basic slider use is better than now. Maybe You're right not completely but right Changed some sliders here
01:50:734 (1) - overlap and stack like this isn't good idea in hard diff don't think so
02:00:334 (1,1,1,1) - is nc really necessary lol i think overused why not?

[Insane]
00:40:792 (1) - why suddenly didn't map downbeat? not good This down beat, not really down beat... xD I mean this beat is too weak and miss it acceptable

no distance logic, pattern also not logical in most part. have to think more about it i disagree
should i really comment it?

good luck!

P A N wrote:

your map is the 5th map after I post so here is my mod How is it even work? edit.: looks like, sometimes i am getting luck xD
Insane
- 00:31:191 (1,2,3) - make their spacing consistent will be better for visual and playable, spacing from 2 to 3 looks like an error and 1/4 tbh. visually should be similar
- 00:32:563 - http://puu.sh/uG0d3/9737cf27ef.jpg current stream feels kinda off imo, follow the kick and snare instead? I mean make jump on every kick and snare. example pattern: http://puu.sh/uG0to/64a7141208.jpg The idea was - to create a simple stream, because this dense part placed between 2 "calm" sections, so i decide to simplify kick jumps here . No changes for now , but i'll keep it in mind.
- 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - this pattern looks too simple imo, not beautiful. sometimes sipmle way - best way anyway i haven't ideas now...

Hard
- 00:43:534 (1,2,3) - make them like this is easier to read that it's 1/4. the jump is pretty tricky (for hard diff). okay , but i'll anyway use a bit increased spacing because of hold structure of this pattern. Should be more readable and not to hard to catch.
- 00:44:906 (1) - this kind of note is pretty strong so I suggest to unstack for more impact and fun to play. same as 00:50:220 (4,1) good idea
- 01:10:106 (1) - I don't mind inconsistent pattern from 00:59:134 but I think remove NC is better. there doesn't even fit for color change. k
- 01:12:849 (1) - same as above. ^
- 01:16:449 (1,2,3,4) - it's better to get these four the same spacing. oops

Normal
- 00:19:192 (1) - please avoid overlapped in normal diff. done
- 00:36:677 (1) - PLEASE NO, this is even kinda unrankable. normal diff player can't read this tbh. okay( , fixed
- 01:28:792 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too dense for normal diff imo. Yeah i want to get more opinions about this moment... 01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - wanna keep at least 4 reverse sliders, but 01:32:563 and 01:29:820 (3) - i fine with nerf here. will see...

pretty good map, good luck!

Mitkoff wrote:

P A N wrote:

your map is the 5th map after I post so here is my mod How is it even work?

1. 00:14:563 - try adding a note here for the vocals
2. 00:17:306 - same
3. 00:20:049 - same
4. 00:26:220 (3) - try putting it somewhere on the other side to flow better with the next slider http://puu.sh/uH6Sk/209dd6ca4c.jpg
5. 00:28:449 (1) - try using a 1/2 slider instead of just a circle, as the vocal is two syllables and lands on the red tick
6. 00:28:963 - ehhh for a long vocal like this, its usually better to try to map some other sounds instead, especially on higher difficulties. This is not very engaging for players of this level.
7. 00:31:877 (2,3) - maybe you should use the same 1/4 ds as earlier
8. 00:33:934 (1,1) - try using the same rhythm for these parts as they are basically the same sound lol
9. 00:37:363 (3,1) - this can be difficult to properly judge the timing as I think most players will be expecting a 1/1 timing between objects due to the rhythm of the previous patterns like 00:34:620 (4,1) - etc. I suggest adding a note at 00:38:049 -
10. 00:40:106 (3,1) - same
11. 00:48:848 (5,1) - why the random bent sliders though. 00:51:592 (6,1) - this is the same thing and its not bent
12. 00:51:934 (1,3) - blanket is off
13. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no need to use so many whistles, it sounds pretty awful especially since the custom hs is so strong. I think one every red tick would be great. also even though there are whistles lets not forget to add the claps too
14. 01:05:134 (1,3) - swap NC
15. 01:05:820 (1) - remove nc
16. 01:13:878 (7,8) - maybe this one should be a slider too to match the instrumental in this section. compare with 01:08:049 (6,7,8) -
17. 01:20:563 - comparing this section to 01:28:792 - the music is basicaly very similar, drums are the same and rap is almost the same. however, your map changes from all 1/2 patterns to lots of 1/4 patterns here and there. I think you should try to use a more consistant style between these similar parts of the song, you can try adding some triples to the first part or removing them from the second one.
18. 01:31:877 (1) - delete NC

eeezzzeee wrote:

Hello Hello O/
NM from my queue

[Insane]

1. 00:14:563 - try adding a note here for the vocals
2. 00:17:306 - same
3. 00:20:049 - same I don't want overmap the beginning, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ , it's a bit too much imo
4. 00:26:220 (3) - try putting it somewhere on the other side to flow better with the next slider http://puu.sh/uH6Sk/209dd6ca4c.jpg let it be
5. 00:28:449 (1) - try using a 1/2 slider instead of just a circle, as the vocal is two syllables and lands on the red tick let it be
6. 00:28:963 - ehhh for a long vocal like this, its usually better to try to map some other sounds instead, especially on higher difficulties. This is not very engaging for players of this level. No changes for now
7. 00:31:877 (2,3) - maybe you should use the same 1/4 ds as earlier already done
8. 00:33:934 (1,1) - try using the same rhythm for these parts as they are basically the same sound lol i don't get it they are the same...
9. 00:37:363 (3,1) - this can be difficult to properly judge the timing as I think most players will be expecting a 1/1 timing between objects due to the rhythm of the previous patterns like 00:34:620 (4,1) - etc. I suggest adding a note at 00:38:049 - Honestly i thought the same at the beginning, but after some test plays i was confused... Some people were say to delete note at 00:38:049 - some were fine with it. I have not big counting of opinions ,but looks like: as high rank player as more chance to expecting down beat note. It make sense as Insane diff, but maybe not bad to make diff more playable for all players, hmmm. Actually this sounds pretty weak and not even close to strong vocal wich place nearly close, so... For diffently gameplay i keep it, at least for now.
10. 00:40:106 (3,1) - same ^
11. 00:48:848 (5,1) - why the random bent sliders though. 00:51:592 (6,1) - this is the same thing and its not bent Yep, they were bent earlier, removed now.
12. 00:51:934 (1,3) - blanket is off fixed
13. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no need to use so many whistles, it sounds pretty awful especially since the custom hs is so strong. I think one every red tick would be great. also even though there are whistles lets not forget to add the claps too good point
14. 01:05:134 (1,3) - swap NC okie
15. 01:05:820 (1) - remove nc ^
16. 01:13:878 (7,8) - maybe this one should be a slider too to match the instrumental in this section. compare with 01:08:049 (6,7,8) - It sounds differently for me Orz, thats why i changed rhytm
17. 01:20:563 - comparing this section to 01:28:792 - the music is basicaly very similar, drums are the same and rap is almost the same. however, your map changes from all 1/2 patterns to lots of 1/4 patterns here and there. I think you should try to use a more consistant style between these similar parts of the song, you can try adding some triples to the first part or removing them from the second one.
    I don't know how correctly explain the idea here in English hmmm. My knowledge is pretty poor as You can notice. I'll try anyway.
    So, as You said i tried carefully follow vocal in my map. There is 3 part of "rap flow" in 01:20:563 - 01:38:392 . I mean 3 kind of emphraise text.
    1st part 01:20:563 - 3 times 8/1 parts with constant 1/2 rhytm, we have mapped only 1/2 notes.
    2nd part 01:28:792 - 1/2 rhythm overloads a lot of s/h sounds wich make "(vocal) flow" more tense and smooth, i am tring to emphraise it with a lot of new 1/4s.
    3rd part 01:34:277 - and finally rest part wich uses pauses in vocal flow like 01:35:477 - and 01:36:849 -. We have a good moment for variativity and i emphraise diferences between heavy (01:28:792 -) and calm (01:34:277 -) sections.
    I know it's not best variation of map it, but i feel it like i described it...
    
    About a lot of missed 1/4s, i wanted to map all stuff in Extra diff, but my imagination hurt me especially for the beggining parts. Also my ability mapping Extra sucks xD. I haven't smthng decent for Ex now. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Yeah, bad news for mapset at all...
    
18. 01:31:877 (1) - delete NC done

Shapes and object placement can use more polishing but I think the biggest problem preventing this from being a great map is the constant 1/2 rhythm that is used during parts that have many 1/4 and other possible sounds too. It makes for a bland playing experience and does not represent the song well imo.

Some general ideas about how to improve the rhythms used in this map:

i see that you are trying to closely follow the vocals whenever they are present, but that ends up neglecting the drums and instruments. you should try to include those too whenever possible to make a more complete map of the music provided. also having more variety in the rhythm of the map makes for a more interesting playing experience.

For example, 01:20:905 (2,3,4) - its quite obvious that between the objects there is drum on the blue ticks. as you probably know, dnb emphasizes the drums! so maybe your map should include them too xd

also try to avoid empty spaces during very intense parts of the song like 01:35:477 -

That's all from me. Don't give up! Fighting! c:

Loreley wrote:

m4m https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506551 (да, она не моя, моддишь только последнюю диффу)

• 
  [Insane]

1. 00:19:535 (5,1) - 00:16:792 (5,1) - ты тут игоришь вокал на красных тиках, хоть основной инструмент в этой части - это вокал, так что просто поставь туда серклы, ну, и во всех подобных моментах. По идее, я хотел оттенить сильные доли от слабых, но кажись это никого не ебет
2. 00:21:249 (3,1) - странная пауза, чтобы не сбиться с ритма, можно поставить серкл на белый тик, там есть какой-то звук Очень слабый звук,честно , не думаю, что тут очень сложно сбиться с ритма
3. 00:22:449 (2) - а из этого сделать слайдер, так как он лучше выделяет вокал(вот тут дропается звук 00:22:792 (3) - ), и слайдер этот лучше замедлить.
4. 00:23:649 (2) - вообще, не люблю маленькие вейв-слайдеры, потому что они все по-ублюдски смотрятся, но если делать правильно, то лучше вот так http://puu.sh/uLRHp/1d6446c9dc.png ( но я бы вообше его заменил) Мне нравятся
5. 00:24:334 (1) - а еще вейвы эстетически хуево смотрятся под таким углом, обычно их применяет только вертикально или горизонтальнос небольшим наклоном
6. 00:28:963 (2) - ну мы же в 2к17, можно и что-нибудь поинтереснее придумать, чем дугу Ну что-то типа того, по эститике правда все рано слабовато
7. 01:00:506 (8) - слишком маленький спейсинг для этого 1/1 бита апнул до предыдущих
8. 01:45:249 (1) - поправить оффскрин бы опустил немного
9. 01:58:620 (5,2) - пониже опустить 5 и ctrl+g для кругового, а значит более удобного флоу Я умышленно не стал тут крутить, до этого слишком много крутили

Phyloukz wrote:

Hello

Insane

00:11:992 (1,2) - i feel like theres a bit off a missemphasis: as you can hear the sounds at 00:12:506 - and 00:13:020 - are really strong (stronger than the sounds you covered with the sliderheads) and currently covered by slidertails (slidertails have the weakest emphasis) which leads to the missemphasis. try to make those 2 sounds clickable
00:15:763 (3) - the same thing appears here. additionally the vocalist pitches her voice up so it should be even more emphasized. Feels fine actually, let's see, i remember it

00:14:563 - i recommend to place circle here for the vocal
00:20:049 - same Nope

00:22:449 (2) - maybe a 1/1 slider to the next red tick instead? for the vocal at the red tick 00:22:792 - Did You test it? it sounds cool, but i'm personaly confuses when i place 1/1 slider here

00:28:963 (2) - i dont see this slider fitting. i see that u wanted to map the vocal here but during the slider she (vocalist) changes her voice, like its not a continously sound- it gets changed (also you are missing a couple sounds too which should not be missed imo) Yep and i still want to keep it. Imo makes emphasis uncommon things is much more important than follow to common 1/1 rhythm

00:33:592 - maybe you can add a slight slider velocity decrease for this slider. i think it fits pretty well here (also NC it then). just a suggestion Yep, sounds cool

00:38:049 - i disagree missing this beat. i would just make 00:37:363 (3) - this a reverse slider so you cover the less important beat with a slidertail. same for 00:40:106 (3) - with unclicable beat i agreed, let it be

00:43:619 (2,3,4) - this flows awkwardly hmm, this sounds unclear

01:19:705 (7) - nc for what?

01:57:248 (5,3) - stack eventually for better structure i changed pattern here so...

02:07:192 - make the spinner end with 5% volume. really noisy sound for not having a sound there Not sure about 5% hmmm it's pretty noticable sound here, but let it be lower

i suck at hard sorry ><

normal

general: i'm a bit concerned about the settings you chose here - you have 1.2x slider velocity and a consistent distance snap of x0.9 which is kinda awkward to play because the sliders have a very fast movement while the movement between each object is really slow (because of the low DS). thats really confusing for newbies and im not sure if you can keep this setting. A simple 1.0 slider velocity and x1.0 DS (+/- x0.2) is rather appropriate. id recommend you to decrease the sv by 0.2 i''l keep it for now, i guess. i have some reason for this settings, also i know some ranked Normal maps with this concept.
This diff is almost hard according osu!system, btw

00:15:763 (3,4) - in low diffs you should avoid this because the sliderend is not pointing to the next object. sure you can use this element for emphasis but you shouldnt do that with the exact opposite direction. kk
00:27:077 (3,1) - same for this, you get it i think

00:43:192 - the soudn changes here so therfore it should be clickable it's normal so, can't uses unconstant rhythm

00:44:906 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you constantly switch between very dense 1/2 rhythm and really slow rhythm. I dont know, i think its not a good thing since the music feels pretty much same intense in that section i don't see any hard to catch things so, tried to follow vocals with constant rhytm and that's it
01:15:764 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - the same problem appears here: you take away the rhythm density (of 1/2 rhythms) for no reason. or at least i can see no reason to because the music doesnt get slower and less intense in any way.. >< emphasis overstrong beats

01:21:420 (3,4) - why do u suddenly decide to stack those? i would rather recommend to make it consistent, so either space it or stack in throughout the map - just to be moire straightforward for newbs For newbs i have easy... i did it for gameplay variavity....

01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - newbies get problems here because they have to react very quickly to the reverses (since they appear multiple times they have to react even faster) so they will most likely miss at that point. you should search for a different rhythm here You know i used 01:22:620 (6,6,6) - this sliders not for just to be, it should be preparation for this pattern. Player already knows how to cath it and it's should be much easier. Also i have some test plays from inexperienced players, thats was like 90% to FC moment.

01:38:392 (1,2,3) - this looks pretty neat at first view but theoretically the player has to do sudden movement changes to the right (so the players does down - right - down - right - down and that with a sharp 90° angle at 1/2 rhythm). thats really awkward and difficult movement i nerfed angle to 60

01:55:535 (2,2) - unintended overlap avoid it

02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - and here you take away the density again, although this feels really intense (at least if u ask me) emphasis overstrong beats again

ok i hope my random mod gives you a few ideas that can improve your map!
i dont actually know where i picked this map up ><

Good Luck on further process! :3

1. Maximum rankable audio bitrate is 192kbps.

1. 00:14:734 (1,2) - It would be nice if you could blanket this so (1) wraps around the head of (2) evenly.
2. 00:45:592 (1,2,1) - 3/2 beat spacing is hard for beginners to read, especially when you mix it with 2/1 beat spacing like 00:47:649 (1,2) so I would recommend choosing a different rhythm.
3. 01:27:763 (4) - Missing clap.
4. Many of the blankets in the map could be cleaner.

1. 00:21:592 (4) - Inconsistent distance spacing before and after.
2. 00:44:220 (2,1) - Would look neater if they weren't so close together.
3. 00:58:963 (2,3) - This angle is awkward imo. Why not make it smooth (1,2,3) or stack (2,3)? Same at 01:09:935 (2,3)
4. 01:04:106 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm would fit the music better since it emphasizes the strong drum on 01:04:449 http://puu.sh/uX0hW/ad8ae8882f.jpg

1. 01:00:506 (6) - Use round slider (not bezier) so you can make a cleaner blanket.
2. 01:15:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This feels kinda weird to play since there's no significant indication in the music for why (5) should be emphasized by unstack. Maybe go for something with (3,4) and (5,6) stacked: http://puu.sh/uX0CE/0a9bfe8fb3.jpg

1. 01:22:277 (2) - Unsnapped.
2. 01:28:192 (6) - Unsnapped.
3. 01:54:334 (5,6) - This slider end stack is kind of unexpected since you didn't use it anywhere else in the map. I think you should just unstack it or make it a 1/4 beat triple.

Hobbes2 wrote:

m4m

[Easy]

00:11:991 (1) - I think it would be better if you captured the synth sound, so a 3/2 reverse slider instead. it breaks intro's consistency
00:45:592 (1,2) - blanket k
01:38:392 (3,1) - stack k

solid diff I guess, blankets need work throughout. It's not that they're necessarily bad, but you should keep them consistent so that the map looks cleaner. As in, make sure the gaps between the objects is the same for all of them. i'll recheck it

[Normal]

00:13:363 (4,5) - Better if it flows. Also it's a bit misleading how far apart these are, it might be DS'd properly but because of 00:13:363 (4) - 's sliderbody they look closer together. perhaps, i changed it
00:22:963 (1,3) - try a better blanket - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669717 okay
00:38:735 (3) - ctrl+j gives better flow, be sure to move the pattern up so it doesnt go off screen i like how it flows now, should be repetitive structure here, so i keep it
00:39:420 (1) - ctrl+h this and then use that for 00:40:106 (2) - they are different on purpose
00:43:192 - should be clickable for proper rhythm, try making 00:42:849 (2) - into two circles instead let it be, sounds nice
01:08:049 - your rhythm skips this sound i know, i can't catch all of them in normal, i should somehow avoid circle"s trains... Miss claps definitely bad idea, so i miss these sounds...
01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - looks cool, but its too much for a normal, in both density and difficulty. i wanna keep it, it fits music cool, it looks cool and it plays fine, i have some test plays about it
01:48:677 (2,3) - use a smoother flow, something like this is better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669739 i wanted somehow emphrase vocal changes (how it can be in normal?), i have tons of patterns on screenshot in kiai

[Hard]

00:33:934 (1) - these sliders skip over the vocal in this section, which i dont really like. you could do circle to 1/2 slider, or just use a 1/2 reverse slider instead.
i don't want to place many did smthing
00:44:906 (1,3) - make parallel? k
00:53:477 (1,2,1,2) - make square Nope
01:04:791 (3,4,5,6) - may look nicer if the heads had the same y value done
01:10:792 (4,6) - are the same slider, but 01:10:106 (2,4) - aren't and it looks weird because of that hmm should be fixed
01:12:849 (2,4,6) - here they're all different, but it would cool if you rotated the slider consistently or something instead of what looks like redrawing the slider randomly each time but they are roteted i don't remember angle but i pretty sure shape is the same
01:42:506 (1) - vocal on tail of this slider, should make it clickable i don't think so hmm, sounds more close to 01:42:849 - imo
01:53:477 (1) - ^vocal isnt as prominent here, but if you change the above change this one too for consistency ^

[Insane]

sightread testplay - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669858 well palyed hope You enjoy

00:43:706 (3) - is a kickslider but 00:44:048 (6) - is not, which makes this inconsistent so let it be
00:46:448 (1) - on this measure, you have the "we" vocal clickable, but on the previous measure it is not (see 00:44:906 (1) - ), this is a bit of cross-measure inconsistency that you should fix it is the point slider in the beginning for playability , other done
00:56:220 (2,3) - here the synth sound gets almost no spacing but then the later ones like 00:57:077 (6) - get a big amount.
01:07:192 (2,3) - ^same here they are sounds different for me like charge effect
01:06:849 (1) - Also for this section NC every measure instead of every two measures imo. Some of these combos are getting pretty long it's kind a wierd looking because of synth based parts...
01:12:334 (1) - for one, I think 01:12:506 - should be clickable to be consistent with earlier in the map where you made the "we" clickable. Also, there's a synth on the blue tick that goes ignored. make sence
01:19:877 (9,11) - could be kicksliders as there are kicks in the music there calm part , keep it
01:42:163 (4,2) - try a smoother overlap https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7669846 k

Good luck!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Hello, #modreqs

[- - Normal - -]

1. - Like any other difficulties around, disable Widescreen Support in the settings on this difficulty. Sure
2. 00:39:420 (1,2,1) - The distance spacing here looks pretty different in-between slider (2). There's one at 0.9x approximately, and the other suddenly went into 0.8x which is a bit closer. The density haven't change around here in exception of the downbeats, so it would be best to rebalance the distance spacing here into 0.9x as how you usually do over most parts of the difficulty. Yep, i foget recheck ds when changed 00:38:049 (1,2,3) - pattern
3. 00:44:906 - & 00:54:848 - A small advice, I highly recommend not to create duplicated inherited points like this. There's no change in volume, sampleset, or slider velocity. Just to help you avoid flooding on the timing setup with the same adjustments, I suggest removing them for sure and keep the originals. It applies to other similar segments further from this. should be good now, other diffs too
4. 01:17:820 - Why did you skipped a potential downbeat? It sounds significantly worthy for adding at least just one circle in order to stress an intense beat for a landing. If you're planning for a symmetric pattern here or something, you can possibly make a solid triangle here once you add an additional note here.
   01:17:820 - 1) Sound here have less intence then 01:16:449 (1,2,3,4) - 2) 01:17:820 - 01:20:220 - this section have equal kicks on white ticks so if i map 1st one, player will be confused on 2nd, 3rd etc... i want to make pause here. So, one original thing what i can catch for this moment it's synth sound but it isn't enough loud for emphraise it in normal diff

[- - Hard - -]

1. 00:28:963 (2) - The aesthetics seem solid and fine, but hey. The red nodes in the middle of this slider seems to be holding a good ride on 00:29:477 -, in spite of mainstreaming the vocals "free" with this long slider. So a good solution for this is moving the second red node a little more above, but not too much, will make the positioning of the slider shape a bit more clear to represent the ride... Maybe the downbeat too, but yeah. Let me give you a hand by dropping you a sample for this, if you want it. Yes, i tried to copy it
2. 00:32:563 (1,2,3,4) - Kinda okay when you're intended to increase the spacing overtime here. But why not doing something a little more interesting other than keeping up linear 1/4-repeated sliders? Either making a good curvy pattern, or something that can shape this pattern aesthetically greater. So, it may be that. Line structure here for easy flowing , i wanna place something more easier to catch as it is transition between intro and more activity part. For that reason line structure works well imo. For more intance moments i tried to do more interesting patterns like 00:53:134 (1,1,2,1,2) -
3. 00:36:677 (1) - 00:39:420 (1) - The placements of the red nodes over these two sliders are probably random to follow the buzzing bass on the song track, to me at least. So to keep things in balance for the patterning, maybe try a slider shape that buzzes accurately too. Alike this one parhaps. Just as the song track buzzes the bass and the slider does it too, it's create a good emphasis for sure. Let it be
4. 00:46:448 (1,4,1) - Okay so, these notes seem to overlap pretty awkwardly. Too far due to the approach rate, but visible to see even in gameplay. You may wanna give them a little more space from each other to keep things clear for readability. sure
5. 01:07:363 (2) - The structure here seems a bit too sharp for a turn and it doesn't really get something good out of it. So to improve this even a little bit, try a vertic flipping this slider with Ctrl + J... and make a little blanket if you mind for aesthetics. It would give you the best results in patterning so far. Yes, ctrl-j seems much better
6. - The same thing for the duplicated inherited points issue.

[- - Insane - -]

1. 00:39:420 (1) - Probably an exact copy of the last two wiggled sliders. To differ a little bit of the emphasis, it may look cooler if it were to wiggle the slider straight than curving again. Just so you could keep up the differential structure and make it more interesting to play. Imo it's fine, not worth it, destroying visual circular flow
2. 00:43:706 (3,4) - 00:44:049 (6,7) - 00:44:563 (9) - Ehh, I wonder why have you done a jump on the first two parts mentioned, and not the last one. The song intensity is pretty much similar and the guitar sounds gradually increases it's pitch greatly, so why this isn't implemented for a worthwhile jump? heh, it's a good question... i made a jump
3. 00:48:163 (3,4) - The rhythm here is likely to be undermapped, while the downbeat and vocals on 00:48:334 - lands the beat very dense. Speaking about rhythm composition, maybe you could do some circle + slider + circle in replacement of these two sliders here? It would emphasize the song track much more correctly if done in perspective. If applied, make sure to redo the patterning as well applied
4. 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - 01:08:049 (6,7,8) - Heh, a clear copy-paste from the first part to the second. You know, copy-pasting a single part of a verse shouldn't be a thing if you're gonna get this into a process of ranking. But talking about linear sliders, I probably dislike those kinds of patterns since they don't represent a lot of dropoffs and structures well... if not used correctly of course. But I mean it to say this, I suggest to reconsider mapping this into something else that's more incentive for the efforts in mapping the two parts here. Well, i still learn how to map... and still looking for a line between variability and sequence, places like this(wich sounds the same) make me a bit confuse because when i trying map it in different way it triggers peoples every time
   . And if to be honest i don't get why these sliders represent music badly... oh, for now no changes i guess, I'll think what can i do here...
5. 01:07:706 (4,6) - The two notes suffices the screen display in gameplay and editor mode. Kinda near off-screen, or close to touching the edge of the players' monitor screen but it's bared to look through it. So it's a subjective issue, you can move it a little higher if you think it would be that much of a problem. I don't really mind~ It's up to you. Yeah i can move it up

Well, that should be it! Well-flowed map, keep it up~

Mapper wrote:

why did you completely ignore what i said in the end? at least make a comment on it.

Mapper wrote:

Doesnt look like a lot but there are a lot of problems with this diff. you shouldnt go for rank on this honestly.

Mapper wrote:

id say you should map more, try new stuff and "modding" your own maps and try to find as many problems as possible.

Swiftis wrote:

Great mapset. No problems as far as I can tell. Good luck on getting ranked! ^^

1. "(feat. UK:ID)" is generally attached to the artist, not the title, switch that around
2. totally optional but you can add the tags monstercat ukf if you want

1. CS3.4 is more logical because it makes the sliders not overlap each other as much
2. 00:11:991 (1) - imo, this is overmapping for an easy, and you missed the essential beat 00:12:506 - here in doing it
   consider instead mapping this rhythm:
   
   SPOILER

   
   of course if you do this (recommended), then also consider doing it for the repeating rhythms 00:14:734 - / 00:17:477 - / etc.
3. 00:25:363 (1) - this rhythm is bad because you missed emphasizing the strong downbeat 00:25:706 - here
   change 00:25:363 (1) - this to 2 circles and make the circle 00:25:706 - here the NC
4. 00:25:363 (1,2) - the flow here is bad because of the direction that the player has to shift here so quickly
   the movements are generally not as smooth as they should be here
   
   SPOILER

   • https://puu.sh/v3O9f/9636dd9cd2.jpg
5. 00:44:906 - similar error to 00:25:363 (1) - here, you need to emphasize this strong downbeat by making it a clickable note and an NC since this is the strongest beat around here
   the rhythm needs to be changed to this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:48:849 (3) - this is an offbeat that an easy player would have trouble hitting, consider learning more about polarity in a tutorial https://youtu.be/53PkFLrK8Ws
   and I'm noticing this a lot in the rest of your easy, please fix it ;;

1. 00:15:077 (2) - the flow is much more linear at x256 y236
2. 00:35:477 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better
3. 00:40:963 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better
4. 01:08:221 (4) - flows better at x20 y156
5. 01:48:677 (2,3) - thats too much overlap its hard to read

Jonawaga wrote:

hai from mod queue Hello
little help post here
[general]

1. "(feat. UK:ID)" is generally attached to the artist, not the title, switch that around that's how it wrote in EP track list
2. totally optional but you can add the tags monstercat ukf if you want sure

[easy]

1. CS3.4 is more logical because it makes the sliders not overlap each other as much they don't overlap at all orz
2. 00:11:991 (1) - imo, this is overmapping for an easy, and you missed the essential beat 00:12:506 - here in doing it
   consider instead mapping this rhythm:
   
   SPOILER

   
   of course if you do this (recommended), then also consider doing it for the repeating rhythms 00:14:734 - / 00:17:477 - / etc. 00:13:020 - beat more important then 00:12:506 - and i tried to cath every sounds on white ticks
3. 00:25:363 (1) - this rhythm is bad because you missed emphasizing the strong downbeat 00:25:706 - here
   change 00:25:363 (1) - this to 2 circles and make the circle 00:25:706 - here the NC following for vocals is more intuitive here imo
4. 00:25:363 (1,2) - the flow here is bad because of the direction that the player has to shift here so quickly
   the movements are generally not as smooth as they should be here i made in softer
   
   SPOILER

   • https://puu.sh/v3O9f/9636dd9cd2.jpg
5. 00:44:906 - similar error to 00:25:363 (1) - here, you need to emphasize this strong downbeat by making it a clickable note and an NC since this is the strongest beat around here i agree
   the rhythm needs to be changed to this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:48:849 (3) - this is an offbeat that an easy player would have trouble hitting, consider learning more about polarity in a tutorial https://youtu.be/53PkFLrK8Ws
   and I'm noticing this a lot in the rest of your easy, please fix it ;; i saw this video already i think... it's kind a subjective opinion... i give a bit more space for reaction for each section where i swap to red tick (2beats and 1,5 beats), and i give player 1,5-beat space to catch that swap, and then use same rhytm pauses for same swaps For now no changes, let's see, if someone else point it out

[normal]

1. 00:15:077 (2) - the flow is much more linear at x256 y236 mmm ???
2. 00:35:477 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better fine let it be
3. 00:40:963 (2) - / 00:38:220 (2) - ctrl+j here looks and flows better ^
4. 01:08:221 (4) - flows better at x20 y156 okay
5. 01:48:677 (2,3) - thats too much overlap its hard to read Not too much imo

hopefully thats enough to be helpful, best of luck~