Blan_C wrote:

Yo, NM from #modreqs Yo O/

• Just play

1. 00:11:992 (1,2) - Blanket is a bit off
2. 00:16:449 (4,5) - ^
3. 00:17:842 (2,3) - ^
4. 00:19:192 (4,5) - ^ fixed all ^
5. 00:23:649 (2,3,1) - You can make triangle: end of slider (2), circle (3) and slider (1) 60degrees tringle? let it be
6. 00:28:963 (1) - Try to make this slider look better, bend it somehow i like how "free" is it xD
7. 00:34:277 (2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/tyaqZ/8f87d5047f.jpg Nope,i want a blanket for 2 circles from this slider
8. 00:38:391 (2,4) - blanket is a bit off should be good now
9. 00:44:135 (5,1) - i dont like this overlap yeah, it supose to stack, fixed
10. 00:45:934 (5,2) - ^ Nah, I like it
11. 00:59:134 (2,3,4) - this and 00:59:820 (5,6,7) - are the same things but spacing is different fixed
12. 01:07:192 (2,3) - Blanket is a bit off fixed
13. 01:10:106 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Spacing ^
14. 01:41:134 (1,4) - I dont like this overlap fine for me and i have bo idea how to avoid this without changing flow
15. 01:43:191 (4,1) - This one too ^
16. 01:43:705 (6,5) - stack mb? yep
17. 01:46:277 (5,1) - you can make a blanket here i prefer pverlap for saving bigger spacing (strong beat)
18. You shall avoid placing sliders at red ticks, because more important beats starts on white tick just like here 00:50:906 (3,4,5) - or 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - The main idea is highlighting "back" sounds and vocal witch starts on red ticks here
    Imo its better to place them on white ticks

Map is good without many issues, avoid ovrlaps to make map clean and easier to read
GL

BOUYAAA wrote:

Hi M4M Hello
Respond properly please I tried


Easy :

00:24:334 (1,1) - song isn't strong enough tu justify NC spam i suggest you remove this one 00:24:334 (1) - done

00:22:963 (1,1) - That's more of a personal opinion but i think objects being this close make the map look kinda crowded I do not see anything wrong here

00:35:306 (1) - move this down a bit so it looks a bit more balanced http://puu.sh/tyboL/0f4cfa0c38.jpg done , 00:39:077 (2,1,1) - done here too

00:36:677 (1) - I don't really understand your reasoning for ending this slider here, the vocal is pretty weak. You have a strong vocal on this tick 00:37:363 - so i'd suggest making the slider end here The idea was making identical rhythm as 00:33:934 (1) - but changing pattern. The main idea of easy diff is simple rhythm, with small changes for diversity

00:38:049 (1) - same for those that follow. You lose too much emphasis on strong vocals by doing this. also 3/2 gaps are hard to read for beginners It's easy to read because of i use same rythm from 00:33:934 - to 00:42:163 - witch starting with sliders
About emphasis? Yes i sacrifice it for easier rythm. Yes, i think it is easy. This is best variation for this section what i could find
00:45:592 (1,2,1) - If I understood correctly you're trying to follow the slight synth sound. If that's the case i suggest you try this rythm http://puu.sh/tybPo/093db4b8cc.jpg Yep, You understood right, but your suggestion is harder...

01:04:449 (2,3) - these look too close imo no it's fine

kiai is good

Hard? : Not too hard

00:12:506 (2) - if you wanna follow the continuous sound i'd say extend it to here 00:12:849 - . As of right now your slider ends on a sound that has nothing to do with the synth which sounds a bit weird hmm, honestly i don't think so... I wanted to get two this sounds together so...

00:26:734 - you've been following the vocals since the beginning so why not map this? 00:26:777 - because it starts here, i cant map 1/8 sound and don't want to under map it... Yes it's wierd 00:26:392 - let it be circle here hmmm

00:28:106 - same here, seing the density of what's coming up there is no real reason to leave this out 00:27:763 - synth sound end here, for emphasis this one i silenced 00:28:106 - vocal here( it's weak vocal so not a big deal)

00:37:363 (3,1) - idk man flow really isn't good here. Movement is completely broken which is kind of not recomended for easier diffs i already understood that we have different ideas about good flow after modding your map lol. Here i wanted to force the player make an anticlockwise move, 00: 37: 877 - with this break, flow should be fine.

00:42:849 (3) - so uh notice how there is a huge sound ont he sliderend. This should probably be clickable. And if your answer to that is following vocals than you should probably make this sliderend clickable 00:43:534 (1) -. Any of both would work Yes, i follow vocal, now 00:43:877 (2) - clickable

00:53:477 (1,1,1) - ncing is awkward if you wanna pair beats pair the right ones 00:53:134 (1,1) - 00:53:820 (2,1) - 00:54:506 (2,1) - so that rythm is still clear to the player It's kinda strange but i NCing vocal here. i think in this way it's easier to read

01:30:849 (3,4,5) - until now your flow was pretty smooth but here you completely break it by having that backward/forward movement. I don't really see it being justified here Vocal again, repeating structure. I tried to map this whole vocal in a diversity process, and decide to break flow here to 01:30:677 (2,3,4,5) - 2 similar patterns.


Insane :

00:26:220 - 00:27:934 - 00:28:277 - why no notes here there are clearly distiguishable vocals it's weak vocal points, i don't want to spam a 1/4s in the beginning. it supposed to be slow

00:48:163 (3,4) - These sliders feel really off. They start on a very weak sound and end on something huge. This messes up rythm as the player doesn't click on prominent sounds anymore. Having these sliderends clickable would be way better imo
This issue is repeated here : 00:50:906 (3,4) -
00:53:134 - anything before here based mainly on vocal , 00:48:848 (5,1,5,1) - only here i starting highlight really strong sounds for player, prepering for part without vocals and then tring to follow both of them...

01:33:591 (1,1) - 01:31:877 (1) - 01:58:277 (1,1) - Questionable NCs Yep, tipical pp jumps xD

01:46:277 (5,1) - Yopu kinda do this alot but to improve aesthetics a little i suggest you don't make objects touch like that when they appear at the same time on the screen. Either stack them a decent amount or separate them i made better overlap overlap, 01:46:277 (5,6,1,4) - should be looks much better


Alright that's it. Nice song choice.

Gl!

Mod

1. Hard? It's not recommended to use custom diffname, if its not the highest diff
2. Those SR gap are quite huge, (especially the normal & hard), might want to slip in another diff. idk
3. 01:01:877 - might want to consider to lower the hitsound volume (especially in the Insane, its.. really.. loud...)

1. There's alot of distinguishable vocal in the beginning you didnt map (00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - etc.), you could put circle or just some slider, it help to map the beat, it also help emphasize the tempo / flow of the vocal (you'll get the idea :/)
2. 00:20:563 (2,3) - purely aesthetic, make this parallel
3. 00:33:592 (10) - this is a 3/4 slider, not a repeat slider
4. 00:35:306 (1) - you got a bit too much 1/2, start the beat at 00:35:477 -
5. 00:42:163 (1) - ^ (if it because the instrument its not emphasizing really well, and its pointless since the next part you map is following the vocal, might as well stick with it)
6. 00:53:476 (5) - this need more emphasizing... (kickslider?)
7. 00:55:191 (1) - make this horizontal instead of vertical it make a better flow, imo. (On side note 00:55:534 - just a suggestion but it'll better if you cut the repeat slider and make a slider here, but.. yknow)
8. 01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think you got the rhythm wrong, try listening it slowly, try this one
   
9. 01:19:534 (6) - NC? it help with reading since 01:19:192 (5,6) - and 01:19:534 (6,7) - is roughly the same
10. 01:34:105 (1) - why NC?
11. 01:33:591 (1) - this definitely follow the instrument, why the sliderend so stronk

1. 00:21:249 (3) - before this, it was mapped to the vocals but this slider is mapped to nothing
2. 00:33:249 (6,7,8) - not perfect curve
3. 00:33:249 (6) - better to start NC
4. 00:38:049 - i think is better to map this tick because there is a sound every white tick
5. 00:40:792 - same ^
6. 00:42:677 (4,5) - should be the same spacing or more as 00:42:505 (3,4) - because the hype part.
7. 00:43:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - every tick has a beat except 00:44:306 - this tick, i think you should map those , for example 00:43:620 - , 00:43:792 - and 00:43:963 - has the same sound
8. 00:44:477 - this too ^
9. 00:54:420 (4,5) - why this has more spacing than the previous circle
10. 00:55:191 (1) - this should start here 00:54:420 (4) - listen closely
11. 00:57:077 (6) - NC
12. 00:59:820 (1) - NC
13. 01:01:534 (2) - try with ctrl + G, i think it should not overlap it's not the same sound
14. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i don't understand the sliders, if you are mapping part of the bass, 01:03:249 (11) - this should be shorter and do something like you did here 01:03:592 (12,13,14) -
15. 01:08:049 (6) - NC
16. 01:10:792 (1) - NC
17. 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why is the rhythm different than this part 01:08:049 (1,2,3,4,5) - same sounds but just more quiet, try to use the same pattern but less spacing
18. 01:14:563 (10,11) - why overlap, kick and snare are different sounds
19. 01:16:792 (1,2,1,2) - these two are the same but 01:16:449 (1,2) - is not, try overlapping them
20. 01:19:705 (7) - NC
21. 01:22:792 (5,6,7) - why triple
22. 01:27:420 (1) - NC
23. 01:28:791 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here looks really random until here 01:32:563 - for example 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part and this part 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are not even the same rhythm, same 01:31:448 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - i don't understand what are you mapping
24. 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,1) - why stream?
25. 01:33:591 (1) - with this slider you are ignoring 01:33:763 - and 01:33:934 - both are strong beats
26. 01:39:248 (3) - why this is not a slider it should follow the same rhythm as before
27. 01:39:763 (1) - from here the spacing looks random, i think you should emphasize the beats for example 01:40:620 - this is a strong beat, but you made it a slider end i think it should be a slider head or a circle
28. 01:41:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i like this part because you are mapping part of the vocals and the beats, makes sense.
29. 01:44:905 (5,6,1) - this should have more spacing than before, more intensity
30. 01:58:277 (1,2,1,2) - weird , angles too wide and this should be 2 sliders to match the vocals like you did before
31. 01:59:820 (1) - NC to match the beat
32. 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - make each triple NC
33. check the NC of the whole song, you should use it do diferentiate patterns and secctions, some combos you are doing it too long, it goes up to 14, this is ok if is a stream but they aren't

Underdogs wrote:

testplay for 3 star

since i like Muzzy, have a mod

[Easy]

Rhythm choice is kind of random here, and some should be pointed out in my mod

Also check AiMod in Easy (unsnapped object)

fixed

Mod

00:20:220 (1,1) - overlap noticed in editor and gameplay changed
00:25:363 (1) - slider end should be clickable mb no
00:26:734 (3) - i dont suggest mapping vocal, because you map 1/1 slider and then suddenly the slider goes long, which I think it is inconsistent nothing wrong for me, if i will not map vocal, what should i map here xD?
00:36:677 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - why change the note to 3/2 slider and circle? It sounded the same as 00:33:934 (1,1) - so I think mapping this the same as the notes 00:33:934 (1,1) - would be consistent and help newbies to feel the buildup rhythm for diversity mapping
00:42:163 (1,2,3) - this look bad tbh. reposition 00:42:163 (1) - should be better now
00:53:134 (1) - wat is this lol just a slider
00:59:134 (2,3,4) - I don't like how you map this part. You miss a lot of hitsounding potential by mapping the offset of the map that was an idea, map offset xD
01:00:506 (4) - On this note, 01:01:020- has stronger priority than the blue tick. Don't worry about removing. Just make the slider 1/1 and add a circle it' make a bit less emphasis on offset
01:02:392 (3) - the repeat arrow should be clickable hmm, fine for easy
01:06:849 (1) - finisher hitsound here mmm, it is here already
01:08:049 (3) - I don't hear anything from the blue tick, consider changing there isn't anything xD, just emphasis long offset part , i should think about it
01:09:592 (1,2) - potential blanket so let it be
01:11:478 (4) - the blue tick didnt have a sound. Change this as well
01:13:363 (3,4) - could be blanket Nope
01:17:477 (6) - after this note add another one. The big tick shouldn't be missed this kick is less strong than previous, it makes no sense
01:20:563 (1) - on this section before kiai, I think the rhythm choice is something i should not recommend. Easy players are trying to adapt to the rhythm game and the rhythm choice you use is somehow confusing. I'd map this 1/1 all the way rather than adding circles like 01:21:249 (2) - to avoid confusion it's fine for me hmmm, 1/1 is boring. I don't want it.
01:34:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why is the intensity of the circle goes low here? It sounded the same as 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) - lol , vocal flow... 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) is way faster

lazy to mod all diff aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

sullywally wrote:

#modreqs

[General]

1. Hard? It's not recommended to use custom diffname, if its not the highest diff why not? it's clearly understandable whith level is it... right?
2. Those SR gap are quite huge, (especially the normal & hard), might want to slip in another diff. idk hmm, +1,6 +1,3, maybe, but i tried to make hard without 1/4 and hard flows. Will see what others are thinking about it. secretly i have half mapped 2,4 star diff
3. 01:01:877 - might want to consider to lower the hitsound volume (especially in the Insane, its.. really.. loud...) to 80 %

Anyway...

[Just Play]

1. There's alot of distinguishable vocal in the beginning you didnt map (00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - etc.), you could put circle or just some slider, it help to map the beat, it also help emphasize the tempo / flow of the vocal (you'll get the idea :/)it makes rhythm indistinct, less structured. I skipped weak vocal points for making a rhythm more stable
2. 00:20:563 (2,3) - purely aesthetic, make this parallel Nope, i like it
3. 00:33:592 (10) - this is a 3/4 slider, not a repeat slider yep
4. 00:35:306 (1) - you got a bit too much 1/2, start the beat at 00:35:477 - 00:35:306 - there is beat actually
5. 00:42:163 (1) - ^ (if it because the instrument its not emphasizing really well, and its pointless since the next part you map is following the vocal, might as well stick with it) ^
6. 00:53:476 (5) - this need more emphasizing... (kickslider?) ye why not
7. 00:55:191 (1) - make this horizontal instead of vertical it make a better flow, imo. (On side note 00:55:534 - just a suggestion but it'll better if you cut the repeat slider and make a slider here, but.. yknow) mmm haha, i know that it make a better flow. It is not noticeble right now like it was in 1st update, but i tried to picture "gun fire" xD i guess i keep that one
8. 01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think you got the rhythm wrong, try listening it slowly, try this one i heared 01:17:049 - beat , i think it is much low hype.
   
9. 01:19:534 (6) - NC? it help with reading since 01:19:192 (5,6) - and 01:19:534 (6,7) - is roughly the same Yep
10. 01:34:105 (1) - why NC? i fogot remove it from last mod xD
11. 01:33:591 (1) - this definitely follow the instrument, why the sliderend so stronk how should i know? ask muzzy lol . there is stronk soud - i make clap. i 'm simple man.

I'm not gonna comment on the aesthetic since your style of mapping is probably different from mine (yes i know there's one up there, but its triggering me so much) mmm

Good luck ranking this Thank You

6th wrote:

Hey yo

[Easy]
00:22:963 (1,2,3) - Increase the spacing a bit to make it look neater. It won't affect the gameplay. a bit
00:45:592 (1,2) - I'm really unsure that beginners are able to suddenly catch a note on red tick after such low note density. I suggest using CTRL+G to them and moving the circle to white tick. Same goes for the rest ofc. hmmm i don't think so.
00:57:077 (3) - Repeating it on a tick that represents nothing is really annoying tbh... you can't do that. i can xD, the problem is why i shouldn't. because of here no beat? so i could silence the slider end and change slide point sound for easy.... Flow? It flows easy as hell.
01:01:706 (1,2,3) - Having 3 circles clickable in a row is a bit too sudden for an Easy diff, isn't it ? it isn't 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - 4 here

[Not so Easy]
00:11:991 - 00:14:734 - 00:17:477 - Try having a consistent rhythm since they sound the same. Vocals aren't that important and are undermapped so those 1/1 sliders aren't necessary. i don't get it
00:52:792 (4,1) - Space them more for aesthetics purpose. done
01:01:363 (1,2) - Fully stack them ? That fake stack is misleading and looks a bit random. fine
01:05:476 (2) - You should convert it to 2 circles to emphasize downbeat/vocals. don't think so
01:15:763 (3,4,5,6) - This is a difficulty spike, space them less. Don't forget doubles are much harder to play. right
01:07:363 (2,3,4,5) - Having an irregular spacing is really inconsistent with that previous stack 00:56:734 (3,4) - why not?
01:58:277 (3,4) - Why is spacing decreasing between them ? i tried to avoid overlap, changed

[Just play]
00:28:963 (1) - You never followed vocal that accurately previously, that big slider is meaningless. There wasn't strong vocal enough.
00:54:848 (1) - That slowdown is really unpredictable, since it looks like most 1/2 sliders of the map. Also it breaks the momentum so just map it normally. Stream is slow flow so i think you can prepare for it.
01:05:306 (2,3) - Spacing should increase between them rather than decrease. In fact you should move (2) closer from (1).
01:16:449 (1,2) - Blue ticks shouldn't have clap since it's not as intense as other ticks. yep
01:27:248 (6) - Move it a bit up so it makes a triangle with 01:26:734 (4,5) - done
01:43:877 (1) - It could be more interesting to play if you use CTRL+G to it imo since it would give some emphasize to the vocals by changing the flow. You suggest to changing flow in kiais too many times
01:51:077 (2,3) - That stack feels rather random for a map that is based on movement. mmm , i want change circle flow here, and did't find smthing better than stack
01:58:105 (2,1,2,1,2) - That curve is super uncomfortable to play tbh... mind using CTRL+G to 01:58:448 (2,1) - ? it's just hard. Noone likes old patterns nowdays i'll change it for your variation if more people call it unplayable

That's all from me. Good luck! Thanks

smau5 wrote:

#modreqs

General

1. you should enable widescreen support hmm, why? it's for storyboards.

[Just play!]

1. 00:21:249 (3) - before this, it was mapped to the vocals but this slider is mapped to nothing rhythm heritage
2. 00:33:249 (6,7,8) - not perfect curve it's changed
3. 00:33:249 (6) - better to start NC should be fine
4. 00:38:049 - i think is better to map this tick because there is a sound every white tick yeh, but looks like the most of peoples don't hear it in a gameplay so i decide to avoid it
5. 00:40:792 - same ^ ^
6. 00:42:677 (4,5) - should be the same spacing or more as 00:42:505 (3,4) - because the hype part. I think it's enough spaced
7. 00:43:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - every tick has a beat except 00:44:306 - this tick, i think you should map those , for example 00:43:620 - , 00:43:792 - and 00:43:963 - has the same sound hmm i don't hear it honestly
8. 00:44:477 - this too ^
9. 00:54:420 (4,5) - why this has more spacing than the previous circle yep, i changed it
10. 00:55:191 (1) - this should start here 00:54:420 (4) - listen closely aaaa, i know i skiped beat, i tried to picture "gun fire"
11. 00:57:077 (6) - NC 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - dont want to make differences for woob sounds, this part based on it
12. 00:59:820 (1) - NC ^ same reason
13. 01:01:534 (2) - try with ctrl + G, i think it should not overlap it's not the same sound don't get the reason
14. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i don't understand the sliders, if you are mapping part of the bass, 01:03:249 (11) - this should be shorter and do something like you did here 01:03:592 (12,13,14) - listen carefully offset 01:03:249 (11) - extended sound with catching 01:03:420 - that beat
15. 01:08:049 (6) - NC i told why
16. 01:10:792 (1) - NC
17. 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why is the rhythm different than this part 01:08:049 (1,2,3,4,5) - same sounds but just more quiet, try to use the same pattern but less spacing because the "background" sounds different, and i like to make diversity rythm
18. 01:14:563 (10,11) - why overlap, kick and snare are different sounds so? i want stop flow before next part.
19. 01:16:792 (1,2,1,2) - these two are the same but 01:16:449 (1,2) - is not, try overlapping them It's not really noticable in gameplay
20. 01:19:705 (7) - NC 01:19:534 (1) - should be better
21. 01:22:792 (5,6,7) - why triple 01:22:877 - because i shoud map this sound
22. 01:27:420 (1) - NC actually why not
23. 01:28:791 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here looks really random until here 01:32:563 - for example 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part and this part 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are not even the same rhythm, same 01:31:448 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - i don't understand what are you mapping I tried to folllow vocals.
24. 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,1) - why stream? ^same reason
25. 01:33:591 (1) - with this slider you are ignoring 01:33:763 - and 01:33:934 - both are strong beats yeh, it was made for emphasize difference between vocal flows 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here and 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here
26. 01:39:248 (3) - why this is not a slider it should follow the same rhythm as before increases hype by 01:39:248 (3,4) -
27. 01:39:763 (1) - from here the spacing looks random, i think you should emphasize the beats for example 01:40:620 - this is a strong beat, but you made it a slider end i think it should be a slider head or a circle backgraud sounds
28. 01:41:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i like this part because you are mapping part of the vocals and the beats, makes sense.
29. 01:44:905 (5,6,1) - this should have more spacing than before, more intensity you are right, increased
30. 01:58:277 (1,2,1,2) - weird , angles too wide and this should be 2 sliders to match the vocals like you did before changed
31. 01:59:820 (1) - NC to match the beat nope
32. 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - make each triple NC yep
33. check the NC of the whole song, you should use it do diferentiate patterns and secctions, some combos you are doing it too long, it goes up to 14, this is ok if is a stream but they aren't

UndeadCapulet wrote:

From my queue:

General

Your bg seems to be of very low quality, it's very grainy and blurry. I think you should try to find a crisper, cleaner bg for this song. (Also maybe something that isn't from an unrelated anime lol..) Who cares? i like it. Mb later.

---

Insane

Your intro rhythms are very random imo, you seem to mostly follow vocals, but also frequently skip over strong vocal beats like 00:20:049 - or add extra beats like 00:26:906 (5) - . You also randomly follow instrumental like at 00:21:249 (3) - . I think you should try to restructure your intro rhythms to fit either the instrumental or the vocals better. If you follow instrumental, you can show off the 3/2 rhythms and stuff like 00:16:792 - and 00:18:506 - . (This applies to all difficulties) image: i cut intro for 2 parts: 00:11:991 - 00:22:277 - . Less dense, more dense. Should be more sence with this criteria.

1. Extending 00:33:592 (10) - to the kiai would fit well with how you extend sliders in the kiai. Yep
2. You skip beats like 00:38:049 - even though you mapped 00:35:306 - earlier. I think focusing so much on vocals here that you skip these beats really kills the pacing of your map.
3. Really really think you should have some sort of clickable object at 00:55:534 - to map that laser out ;; hmmm, i wanted to make 2 reverse kicksliders anyway so yea, why not
4. I think skipping the 01:35:477 - and 01:36:849 - beats kills the pace of this section a lot. Since it's kind of a fast constant vocal rap section ending any hitsound beats, esp when there are drum ticks there, feels weird. I don't think so
5. 01:39:248 (3) - Should prob be a kickslider to match the surrounding rhythms. i made it as circle for emphraise emphraise 01:39:420 (4) - beat as end of rap section.
6. 01:59:820 (4,5,6) - Separating these notes more from 01:59:648 (3) - would emphasize the drums better. It's good point

---

Hard

01:42:506 (5) - and NC here, I know you didn't so these sliders would fit with the previous pattern, but that's not a good enough reason to have NC inconsistency imo. Same for 01:53:477 (5) - . Yes

---

Normal

Please avoid having entire sections where the DS results in tiny overlaps like 01:41:820 (2,3,1) - . Honestly for a normal that kiai spacing might be too much anyway, but these tiny overlaps especially are unsightly. I can't avoid tiny overlaps and use chnging ds in Normal at the same time ohhhh... I try 1.05 greenline for now, overlaps now much bigger...

---

Good luck with your future mapping!

rockrick wrote:

Hey, from modreqs ^^ Hello O/

normal

00:38:049 (1,2,3) - i can see you wen't with the electronic sound on the background, but emphasizing the vocal on this part would be better imo. i would instead do something like this this I'm fine with current variation. actually i tried to have smthing between vocal and instruments

00:57:249 (4) NC i did't make NC for consistancy with sections like (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - where i skipping down beats
01:08:220 (4) ^ ^

01:24:334 (4) there is a lider end on a measure start here, making 4 a cicle and 5 a slider starting on 01:24:677 would do the trick i'll remember that but now no changes
01:27:077 (4) same here

01:48:677 (2,3) - these two feel a bit too close Yep but i can't make jumps in Normal

insane

00:28:963 (2) - You sometimes make some sliders distorted according to the song like in 00:39:420 (1) and 01:06:163 (10) so i would suggest you make this long slider a bit wobbly or something on the first half, since it's following the vocal, which would also make for some good slider art It's good point let's see...

00:35:963 (4) - 00:38:734 (3) - 00:41:477 (3) - since this part is following vocals, i would make these sliders 1/2 beat, not full beat, because the vocals are emphasized half a beat after the slider beginning You know, people mention that i'm not constant in intro too much xD. I will not changing it more haha

00:54:506 (5,1) - 00:55:192 (5,1) - these 1/4 jumps are a bit too close for this difficulty, especially the second one because it's longer than the ones before it, i would consider it a diff spike, so just getting them a bit closer would do the trick~ In lower diff 1/4 jumps really tricky for players, at least you shoud make it with not clicable object imo

00:58:277 (10) - you can make this slider wobbly like i mentioned on the beginning of the mod, it would add up to the others making things prettier :> Another good catch, and reminder fore me

01:14:734 (11,1) - putting the slider underneath 11 and making it point toward 2 would make it look nicer let it be

01:34:792 (3) - 01:36:163 (3) - maybe it's just me, but i don't think these slider shapes fit the style youré going for in the rest of the map. maybe using red sliderpoints? Idea was 01:37:020 (1,2,3) - make every pattern with "loop flow" which actually a circularity xD that why dots are white


might have missed some stuff, but nice map and cool streams, good luck with it!
edit:timestamps were bugging xd

Little wrote:

[General]

1. Maximum rankable audio bitrate is 192kbps.

[Easy]

1. 00:14:734 (1,2) - It would be nice if you could blanket this so (1) wraps around the head of (2) evenly. k
2. 00:45:592 (1,2,1) - 3/2 beat spacing is hard for beginners to read, especially when you mix it with 2/1 beat spacing like 00:47:649 (1,2) so I would recommend choosing a different rhythm. i want smting interesting, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
3. 01:27:763 (4) - Missing clap. y
4. Many of the blankets in the map could be cleaner. i polish some... also avoid some overlaps

[Normal]

1. 00:21:592 (4) - Inconsistent distance spacing before and after. fixed
2. 00:44:220 (2,1) - Would look neater if they weren't so close together. fine
3. 00:58:963 (2,3) - This angle is awkward imo. Why not make it smooth (1,2,3) or stack (2,3)? Same at 01:09:935 (2,3) changed to line
4. 01:04:106 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm would fit the music better since it emphasizes the strong drum on 01:04:449 http://puu.sh/uX0hW/ad8ae8882f.jpg and less emphasizes 01:05:820 (4) - this one, 01:04:106 (1) - slider here for emphasize 01:04:277 - stretched sound before clap.

[Hard]

1. 01:00:506 (6) - Use round slider (not bezier) so you can make a cleaner blanket. k
2. 01:15:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This feels kinda weird to play since there's no significant indication in the music for why (5) should be emphasized by unstack. Maybe go for something with (3,4) and (5,6) stacked: http://puu.sh/uX0CE/0a9bfe8fb3.jpg Let it be

[Insane]

1. 01:22:277 (2) - Unsnapped. k
2. 01:28:192 (6) - Unsnapped. k
3. 01:54:334 (5,6) - This slider end stack is kind of unexpected since you didn't use it anywhere else in the map. I think you should just unstack it or make it a 1/4 beat triple.Yep i'll change it

Mir wrote:

Hi, from queue. Yo O/

[ Insane]

1. 00:14:563 - Not mapping this note when you mapped the same kind of vocal at 00:13:706 (2) - feels really weird to.. well, not play. I suggest at least putting a circle here. Applies for the rest of the intro. FUCK ME triend to emphasis vocals in 00:14:734 (1) - that way
   
2. 00:22:792 - Would add a circle here, since you do it at 00:24:163 (3,1) too to map both vocals and downbeat. That feels wierd
   
3. 00:28:449 (1) - Would be cooler as two circles, one of which spaced on top of the slider that comes up like this or something. Idk, just would make the pause of the vocal cooler because atm it's kinda lacking. Cool, let it be
   
4. 00:31:192 (1,2) - Could make a blanket with this.
   
5. 00:33:506 (9,1) - DS? You lowered SV and kept distance snapping on I assume. yep
   
6. 00:35:991 (3) - Skipping the middle vocal on 00:36:163 - sounds very awkward considering you mapped the vocals at a high priority in the previous rhythm 00:34:620 (3,1,2). You could make 3 a reverse slider to capture the vocal while still keeping clicking at a minimum. maybe, i'll remember as option, not a bid difference to me
   
7. 00:42:163 (1,2,3,4) - Could make a square. Some kind of
   
8. 00:44:906 - There are three things about this section I want to cover.
   
   1. 00:44:906 (1) - This slider is weird rhythmically seeing as how all the strong sounds end up on its tail rather than the head. It would work as two circles.
      
   2. 00:46:106 - If you're trying to follow the background wub noise, your snapping is completely off. What you have is this and this is the actual snapping. Do we talking about same song hmm? Yeah, my ears are not that musically good, but this sounds not on blues ticks for sure
      
   3. 00:48:163 (3,4,5) - This rhythm is ambiguous to me because I can't figure out what you're prioritizing. It sounds like 5 is trying to follow the wub, but then why are 3 and 4 starting on red ticks? The bass drum is on the white tick. Yes woobs sounds priority. 00:49:877 - sounds like here emphasis visually, have no idea how to explain it
      
9. 01:02:392 (7,1) - These could actually be repeats to keep the noticeable 1/4 still in rhythm. i avoid it for purpose
   
10. 01:03:419 (13) - Kicksliders should start here no? This is where the wubs start to change. Yes
    
11. 01:04:105 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - This whole combo is really chaotic and I can't figure out what you're following. 01:04:105 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Seems to be following 1/4 which is fine, but 01:05:306 (7,8,9,10) - is following the wubs all of a sudden, then 01:05:992 (11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - follows the drums? The transition between all three of these is quite hard to understand in-game at least. I was wondering what it was following. I recommend sticking to one layer and trying to merge rhythms from other layers in passive rhythm such as slider ends or reverse arrows. Exactly like You describe, it's best fits music rhytm imo
    
12. 01:28:277 (7) - What is this section following exactly? It's mixing between drums and vocals so I can't really get what you're following. 01:29:134 (2,3,4) - Feels like vocals seeing as how it's all clickable, and 01:30:420 (2,3,4,5) - sounds like it's following drums. mmm, it's vocal section with increases intensivity
    
13. 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is overmapped, there's no 1/4 here and should be removed imo since it doesn't fit the song. There's plenty of 1/4 elsewhere in the section that you skipped like 01:32:134 (5,6) - yet here you create 1/4 out of nowhere. Continue to follow vocals...
    
14. 01:34:277 - What are you following here? This rhythm doesn't even seem to prioritize any instrument, it just follows the 1/2 beat of the song. If you want to follow drums you should increase and change the rhythm to reflect that, for example this for 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,5) which will allow a much clearer focus on the drums. I don't get point here. It's 1/2 sections with following general 1/2 rhytm, yea. And it's continue vocal's theme. 01:35:134 - i less emphasis this kicks for emphasis difference of vocals 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - and 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) -
    
15. 01:40:277 (3,4) - Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm would give more focus on the drums and the synth at the same time since the slider will be on the held synth and the circle will be on the clicked drum. No changes
    
    
16. 01:54:334 (5) - Could be an actual triple because there is clickable 1/4 here. Yesx
    
17. 01:55:191 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This isn't really following anything with flow or placement and much less rhythm. It's quite stale and I suggest varying flow usage to emphasize vocals such as 01:55:534 - and a slider for 01:55:877 - like you did everywhere else? i on't think so, really
    
18. 01:56:906 (3,5) - This blanket though. xD
    
19. 01:58:105 (2,3,4,5,6) - Spacing looks quite inconsistent, and again the point about no emphasis using flow or placement of 01:58:791 (6) for the vocal.

Generally check visual spacing/blankets etc. and consistency.

[ Hard]

1. 00:44:906 (1) - This being 1/1 doesn't make sense because you skip all of the 1/2 that's going on in this section. It's basically skipping beats that would play better if mapped. i don't think so... Big slider for strong spund on big white tic, why not
   
2. 01:12:334 (1,2) - Could space these out slightly more so they don't look like they almost touch. a bit
   
3. 01:32:220 (8,9) - This rhythm doesn't feel as good as 01:31:706 (6,7) - does to play. It's also weird because the vocal rhythm doesn't change yet you change the click emphasis of it. it's kind a vocal flow changes, feels fine for me hmmm
   
4. 01:39:763 (1,3,5) - Visual spacing could be improved. Yes
   
5. 01:42:163 (4,1) - No emphasis on this downbeat. Could space more or change flow to do so. Even changing the shape of 1 would work. // 01:53:134 (4,1) - 01:58:620 (4,5) -
   
6. 01:58:277 (3,4,5) - 3 is slightly too far away. Okay , i made a visual emphasis for it now, lets see

Same comments as Insane really.

Good luck, lower diffs aren't my forte.~